Top Stories

Henry Chance Aronofsky: Rachel Weisz's Son

Henry Chance Aronofsky: Rachel Weisz's Son

The first official pictures of Rachel Weisz‘s baby boy have started to surface, taken in Battery Park in New York City. The 35-year-old Oscar winner gave birth to her son Henry Chance Aronofsky on May 31st, according to CBB. Rachel is engaged to director Darren Aronofsky, 37. This is the first child for the couple, who are based in New York.  More pictures in the gallery!

UPDATE :: Apologies, images removed!

Like Just Jared on Facebook

JJ Links Around The Web

Neilson Barnard/Getty

86 Responses to “Henry Chance Aronofsky: Rachel Weisz's Son”

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 » Show All

  1. 1
    Nana Says:

    Aaaaawwww! Cute baby boy!Congratulations to Rachel and Darren!

  2. 2
    caligirl1201 Says:

    Finally I’m first. I love Rachel and "The Constant Gardner" was one of the best movies I saw last year so I’m very happy she got an Oscar and a beautiful baby boy. She looks super happy and should make a great mom.

  3. 3
    the tempest Says:

    Aww, he’s adorable.

  4. 4
    Yes I said It Says:

    Sorry but Shiloh is kinda homely compared to Henry and Kingston. What a cutie.

  5. 5
    Zosia Says:

    Absolutelly beautiful baby! I wish the Aronofsky family all the best! :)

  6. 6
    jasmine Says:

    Angie haters are always around. Newborns are always so precious.

  7. 7
    congrats!! Says:

    one of the most credible actresses out there in hollywood. i enjoyed her performances in every film i so far saw of her. i wish her and her family all the best and a very happy, healthy life!!!

  8. 8
    Miss Realistic Says:

    THAT is how you work your family into the media. Very admirable that Darren and Rachel didn’t feel the need to put a price on Henry’s head. Well done you two. The more overrated ‘stars’ and their flock of kids should take a leaf out of your book

  9. 9
    MRealisticblows Says:

    # 8 | Miss Realistic I hope you wrote the same thing in Gwen Stefan’s thread. She was paid $500,000 for pictures of Kingston. Anyone know what she and Gavin did with the money? How about Brooke Shields?

  10. 10
    Suri Says:

    So just to summarize, the ONLY celebrity baby "born" recently that nobody has yet to see is Suri Cruise, right? Hmmm

  11. 11
    Binger Says:

    # 9 | MRealisticblows Don’t forget the money Gwyneth got for pictures of Moses?

  12. 12
    fra Says:

    what a happy family!!! and the baby is gorgeous!!! :-)

  13. 13
    Me Says:

    i personally dont give a damn about suri, im sure she might be ugly and cruise is waiting for her to look better or finding a cuter baby than shiloh to present her as, Eff surii saw this pics before jared posted them here, and OMG!!! he is so pretty!! i hope he hooks up with shiloh!! kudos to darren who is one of the most amazing directors of our time..and i loved rachel in about a boyBTW Jared, you are missing the post about prison break shooting today!!!i need my wnetworth fix!

  14. 14
    cav Says:

    What a cute family! They looks so happy and normal!!! How refreshing. Rachel, keep doing whatever you’re doing because you look great!

  15. 15
    Rica Says:

    # 4 | Yes I said It Just had to get one in huh?Henry is a cuti pie. ALL OF THESE BABIES are simply adorable.

  16. 16
    maggie Says:

    Another playmate for Shi

  17. 17
    here we go again Says:

    # 8 | Miss Realistic And you think that all of these people showing off their offspring did it for FREE?Before you go off spouting crap you know nothing about. Do a little research and find out just how much these people were paid. AND THEY WERE PAID!!!! Just because the PUBLIC demand (tabloid sales) edged BP and AJ to the top of the fold with a 4+ million dollar offer doesn’t imply that those same ‘over rated’ stars as you call them sought that. If the public demanded that Rachel and her little family be on every tab of the week than guess what? they too would have been offered a large amount. Did you talk this much trash when Britney posed with her child, Gwyneth with hers, Brooke with hers, or Malonia Trump? Did you spout crap when Michael Douglas and Catherine Zeta Jones were paid 1 million for their wedding picks? Why do you feel the need to turn something good into a battle against BP/AJ or any other celeb who shines in the lime light? Most of these celebs gave the money to CHARITY! DO YOU GIVE A DIME TO CHARITY? Or do you just sit behind a monitor and pass judgment?Can you answer that?

  18. 18
    sara Says:

    Maybe Rachel and Darren didn’t feel the need to put a price on their baby’s head because they didn’t need to? They are not much in demand in terms of media coverage or attention. Besides they are still posing for official photos with the baby. I don’t see how it can be considered more or less different than other celebrity couples who release baby photos to the public regardless of how much it was sold for.

  19. 19
    Hey, Brad! Love you! Says:

    #8, Miss Realistic…The issue isn’t about feeling the need to put a price on their child’s head, it is about supply and demand. This couple is still able to enjoy a peaceful and civilized life, no adoration-driven hysteria putting a price on Henry’s head. Brad and Angelina are a different story, yet they did not accept money for any reason other than to benefit children through a charitable contribution. Come on. You know that. As for Gwen and others, I doubt they aren’t following that lead. I am sure they, too, are contributing. This baby, the Trump baby, and all others are equally adorable. I think the photographers got more flattering angles and poses for the other babies than those published of Shiloh. I felt they selected the least flattering shots of her. Either her gums were showing, her little lip was curled up, her tiny face was cut in half (when looking over Jolie’s shoulder ) to emphasize her ears and give her a Yoda-like appearance, or her tongue was pushed forward! But there were several, especially the shot with Brad looking down at her and cradling her head, where she looks gorgeous. Congratulations to all these lucky parents!~

  20. 20
    Kyah Says:

    I think they just sit behind a monitor and pass judgement…it’s easier to pass judgement on other people’s lives than it is to look at your own and see where you f**ked up

  21. 21
    Kyah Says:

    and I agree with Sara…plus, many celebs donate to charities and don’t ask for recognition…maybe that’s what happened with some of these other people who sold their baby pics…you don’t know the whole story, so shut up unless you do…and did anyone notice how Brad and Angelina told everyone that would listen what they were doing with the money, instead of just quietly passing it along…why did they feel the need to make such a huge spectacle out of it? Why do they need the publicity…so they can continue making us believe that they care so deeply for others while they sit in their huge mansion with their nannies and butlers and housekeepers and chefs, etc?

  22. 22
    Original jpf Says:

    All these beautiful baby’s being born into the world. I love it……now where’s Suri?jpf

  23. 23
    Original jpf Says:

    # 4 | Yes I said It Why must all these children be compared? Why can’t we just welcome them into the world, and pray they have a blessed life filled with love, and caring? I doubt very seriously all these parents are now or were ever concerned with what the media decided the public she be concerned with.There *I* said it.jpf

  24. 24
    Yes I said It Says:

    Oh lighten up people…don’t worry you can still worship the ground (and apparently water) that Brad and Angelina walk on…It’s called an opinion, we all have them.

  25. 25
    anonimo Says:

    this is most beautiful baby in the world, more Shiloh "Messiah" Jolie- Pitt, more kingston, more sean preston ecc ecc. Good luck at the family and the baby. Rachel is the best actress, her oscar is deserved.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 » Show All

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here