Tue, 21 November 2006 at 9:38 am

New Tom & Katie Wedding Pictures

New Tom & Katie Wedding Pictures

Here’s what looks like a mock-up (final version?) of the upcoming issue of People Magazine, out on newsstands this Friday. The cover is a new picture of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes on their wedding day, which was this past Saturday. To the right is a Good Morning America exclusive screencap from yesterday’s show, showing Tom and Katie sharing their first kiss together as an official couple. Cheers to TomKat!

tom-katie-wedding-kiss-01

tom-katie-wedding-kiss-02

Posted to: Katie Holmes, Tom Cruise
Related posts:

68 Comments

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All

# 1

sam @ 11/21/2006 at 9:42 am

first!

# 2

Tan @ 11/21/2006 at 9:44 am

That was a beautiful wedding and a big one I would of been soooo nervous but I guess when your movie stars your use to that.I wish them the best.

# 3

London BAMZS fan @ 11/21/2006 at 9:45 am

I think they make a lovely couple and wish them the best. Suri is absolutely gorge (don’t care what anyone says)

# 4

tanique @ 11/21/2006 at 9:49 am

thanks jared for the pics, and for just wishing them well without the typical slant put on them. very sweet pics.

# 5

galilea @ 11/21/2006 at 10:15 am

i hope suri will have a wonderful life!

# 6

Fick @ 11/21/2006 at 10:38 am

Cheers!!! Thanks Jared…
Just lovely!

# 7

elisabeth @ 11/21/2006 at 10:47 am

I just love this couple!

# 8

olek @ 11/21/2006 at 10:53 am

i thought there would have been more guests…seems kinda small to be a BIG Wedding.
but despite my aversion against all things scienco (well religion in general) they do look really happy together…and so i wish them well.

# 9

pat @ 11/21/2006 at 11:06 am

It is SO wonderful that to actors are able to get together for a part. They seem to be able to make it look like it’s real!

Suri will have a life filled with worldly things. The only wants she will have is for the love and affection from her mom.
MAybe someday her mom will be able to attend a church that believes in parent chaild bonding.

# 10

WTF @ 11/21/2006 at 11:09 am

Package it up any way you want. This “marriage” is still fake, fake, fake.

# 11

dean @ 11/21/2006 at 11:16 am

“Package it up any way you want. This “marriage” is still fake, fake, fake. ”

YA THINK?

# 12

h @ 11/21/2006 at 11:18 am

with ref to PAT , What right do you have to accuse Katie of not loving her daughter? No right. Just because you don’t like them does not mean that her parents do not love her. You can clearly see that Katie adores Suri. It’s very sad that many people want to tear both Katie, Tom and their beautiful baby apart. You have NO REASON and NO PROOF that Katie does not shower her daughter with love and affection.

Just because you do not like them, or think that they make bad decisions, does not mean that they are bad parents. I think that Tom has some very strange and wierd ideas, and i wouldn’t do a lot of the things he does, but this does NOT mean he does not love his daughter, nor does it mean Katie doesn’t love her daughter. It means i think some of the things they believe in are strange.

Stop being so judgemental. Just because someone has different views from you does not make them a bad person.

Katie’s dress was wonderful. They looked like they had an awesome day. I am very happy for them and wish the entire family all the best.

# 13

Sue @ 11/21/2006 at 11:22 am

What a joke these two are! They claim to just want to be private and live their lives, then have 22 page baby photo shoots and release tons of wedding pictures. If you’re going to talk to the talk, you should walk the walk. Then, again, “Tomkat” and privacy are on opposite ends of the spectrum. These two jokers don’t want to live out of the spotlight, as once the cameras are turned off they have no one to pose for.

# 14

pat @ 11/21/2006 at 11:35 am

“H” the church of co$motogy does not allow a mother to bond with their babies. I have NO doubt that Katie would LOVE to have and hold HER daughter Suri, 24/7. And she’d LOVE to be able to take her out in the FRESH SoCal air when she and Tom go to the park for the weekly photo-ops!

I was NOT judging anyone, I was merly going by THEIR cult beliefs

# 15

pr person @ 11/21/2006 at 11:58 am

These two are pathetic, disgusting, fake, media whoring, Xenu loving cult freaks. I think that is one People magazine I can do without.

# 16

Please explain @ 11/21/2006 at 12:00 pm

John Travolta and his wife Kelly are Scientologists and so are heck of a lot of other stars, yet Tom Cruise is the only one getting dissed. I still don’t understand why you are coming down so hard on people who don’t share your religious beliefs. I thought we had some religious tolerance in this country.

# 17

h @ 11/21/2006 at 12:00 pm

Well, i believe Katie is first and foremost a Catholic, and Tom has said in the past that you can be a Catholic and yet still hold scientological beliefs.

I don’t believe that Katie has not bonded with her child. I believe scientology believes that the baby should be in a calm atmosphere, and quiet for the first hours of it’s life. I think Hubbard actually stated to leave the baby alone for 24 hours. Whereas i don’t agree with that, it still doesn’t make these people bad parents. We don’t even know if Katie did so with Suri. Regardless, it is still possible for mother’s to bond with their babies, a day or so after giving birth.

# 18

kmillz @ 11/21/2006 at 12:12 pm

watch tom dancing!!! http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments&v=nlX-6WRZKKE&fromurl=/watch%3Fv%3DnlX-6WRZKKE

# 19

CLINIQUA @ 11/21/2006 at 12:24 pm

This People Cover story will NEVER be able to catch Shiloh’s, Tom can forget it. LOL a 14 day old baby has kicked his @ss. lolol

# 20

RayG @ 11/21/2006 at 12:29 pm

WHAT IS SAD AS F***K IS YOU MISERABLE PEOPLE WHO CONSTANTLY TAKE SHOTS AT SURI !!! SHE IS A BABY FOR GODS SAKE . EVERYONE IS ENTITLED TO THIER OWN OPINION .. SO LET ME EXPRESS MINE .
ALL OF YOU WHO TAKE THESE LOW BLOWS TO SURI , MUST HAVE F*CKED UP PARENTS WHO NEVER GAVE YOU NO LOVE OR ATTENTION .

# 21

rage @ 11/21/2006 at 12:32 pm

one’ld think after all the shinanigans and build up to the wedding day which turned out to be an anti-climax there’ll be something special about the dress and ceremony but there isn’t,the ceremony from the pics looks so ordinary and plain something everybody and anybody could afford, i mean look at that hall for christ sakes apart from the two bouquets of flowers(which looks ugly and not at all special,just plain bare) there’s nothing else spectacular just same old same really guys think about it weren’t you expecting some sort of heaven after all the TOMKAT brags but then they are classless media whores with no taste also with all the hitch they had on the day they weren’t even sure they’ll be allowed to get married explains why they couldn’t dress up in the hotel and had to go to the haunted castle for that and TC arrived after the bride which shouldn’t be but as you fans say they’re SCIENOS ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

# 22

pat @ 11/21/2006 at 12:32 pm

“H” No one EVER said that Katie was a “bad parent”. But the first few months are the MOST important of an infants life, it is a shame that Katie spends SO MUCH time alone shopping. She should be able to bring her daughter with her or she should stay home and take care of her.

# 23

rage @ 11/21/2006 at 12:44 pm

KMILLZ you are so MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAN but htax absolutely made my day did you see the part that ays TOM KILLS OPRAH that is well HILARIOUS

# 24

ceecee @ 11/21/2006 at 12:48 pm

“Well, i believe Katie is first and foremost a Catholic, and Tom has said in the past that you can be a Catholic and yet still hold scientological beliefs. ”

The Bible says that you cannot serve 2 masters ……….

# 25

Aracely @ 11/21/2006 at 1:01 pm

Aww how beautiful, I guess People scored more pics of them.I can’t wait to see em!

# 26

Frenchy @ 11/21/2006 at 1:08 pm

Interesting article about the wedding:

Tom Cruise’s stunt wedding
Fiona Hudson

November 21, 2006 12:00am

THE wedding of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes has been branded a stunt after the pair admitted they got hitched days before the celebrity bash.

Critics have labelled the Italian ceremony a sham intended to promote the Church of Scientology.

Scientology weddings, which include elements such as a vow never to go to bed angry, are not legally recognised in Italy.

But the couple’s agent said they had “officialised their marriage in Los Angeles prior to their departure for Italy”.

A US gossip show yesterday said the couple would follow the Italian ceremony with a Catholic service in Los Angeles.

Bracciano Mayor Patrizia Riccioni is considering taking back the honorary citizenship she offered the couple before they wed because the small village was offended by their behaviour.

“It would have been nice for them to stop and wave,” she said.

A Catholic priest in the Italian village, Father Nicola Fiorentini, said the town felt insulted.

“It wasn’t a wedding at all. It was just for publicity,” he said.

“I can’t believe such an event was allowed to take place at all.”

The bride and groom are believed to be honeymooning in the Maldives.

It has emerged a Scientology adviser sat at every table during the reception to answer any questions guests had about the unusual ceremony.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,20792950-5006023,00.html

# 27

Be sane @ 11/21/2006 at 1:21 pm

Scientology is a FOR-profit CULT organization, banned in many countries to be recognized as a religion.

# 28

kae @ 11/21/2006 at 1:34 pm

Stop bringing up Shiloh, move on please…

# 29

B @ 11/21/2006 at 1:41 pm

Yes, this wedding is ridiculous and I am pretty sure Katie Holmes has been brainwashed. This wedding is completely fake and you are seriously lacking if you don’t see through it. The only reason this relationship is taking place is because Tom is trying to hide the fact that he is a homosexual. Everybody in Hollywood knows it. It’s really quite sad that he has gone to such measures.

# 30

London BAMZS Fan @ 11/21/2006 at 1:48 pm

hullo people, how sheltered are your lives? It was a ‘religious’ ceremony which lots of people have nowadays. e.g. I have Hindu friends who sign the civil register one day and then organise a big (Hindu) wedding do on another. Why does it have to be a ’sham wedding’ just because they officially got hitched earlier?

Over here in the Europe we usually have 2 ceremonies; the register office one (where some people wear wedding dresses to also), and the symbolic one (which is usually the big affair).

Man you guys are hysterical, and to the Haters - GET A LIFE!!!

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All

Comment and Share!