Top Stories

Victoria's Secret Embrace

Victoria's Secret Embrace

Victoria’s Secret angels (pictured l-r) Selita Ebanks, Izabel Goulart, JJ favorite Alessandra Ambrosio and Karolina Kurkova promote the new Secret Embrace line in New York City. For more pictures of Alessandra Ambrosio and the other Victoria’s Secret models, CLICK HERE!

Like Just Jared on Facebook
victorias secret models 01
victorias secret models 02
victorias secret models 03
victorias secret models 04
victorias secret models 05
victorias secret models 06
victorias secret models 07
victorias secret models 08
victorias secret models 09
victorias secret models 10
victorias secret models 11
victorias secret models 12
victorias secret models 13
victorias secret models 14
victorias secret models 15
victorias secret models 16
victorias secret models 17
victorias secret models 18
victorias secret models 19
victorias secret models 20
victorias secret models 21
victorias secret models 22
victorias secret models 23
victorias secret models 24
victorias secret models 25
victorias secret models 26
victorias secret models 27
victorias secret models 28
victorias secret models 29
victorias secret models 30

JJ Links Around The Web

Christopher Polk/Getty

12 Comments

# 1

Selita and Alessandra are my faves, but if Selita’s ass gone and married Nick Cannon…well, hopefully she didn’t.
Seriously, I can’t believe they get paid so much for this, though. It’s a good thing modelling isn’t a very consistent business. One day, your the hot new ****, then the next, you’re the tired cow (ie: Tyra; she’s great, but that’s how it is).

# 2

whoa, now there’s a bunch of hotness right there.

Karolina has the best legs i’ve ever seen. Selita, Izabel and Alessandra are totally gorgeous as well, but KK is the bombshell for sure.

# 3

As far as I am concerned, none of these models are half as spectacular as the models that were around in the late 70′s and early 80s. They were all as different-looking as night and day. Cindy Crawford looked totally different from Christie Brinkley. The models today look similar. They’re really thin, but something is lacking. Brazil seems to be a popular place to find models. One might have beaiutiful eyes, but her entire face is not striking. Gisele Bundchen is not gorgeous. My opinion. She’s not ugly, but her face is just so-so. Nothing really grabs me when I look at her. These models don’t even have the beauty of an Angelina Jolie or Paulina Porizkova. Is it my imagination or are people getting uglier with each generation?

# 4

Selita Ebanks is beautiful. Selita and Nick Cannon, things that make you say hmmm. Best of luck to them if they are married.

# 5

I agree with Yawn all the models are pretty generic. They all have the same shape face and are really skinny with long hair. They all look the same but have different skin tones and colored hair. Like Barbie. Not that their not beautiful but they’re copies of each other so it makes them less interesting and more generic. In my opinion.

# 6

Since when do “top” models keep their “old” teeth?

# 7
jukeboxer @ 03/03/2007 at 5:05 am

wow, i’m straight girl and these ladys are smoking hot! i wish my legs would look like that.

# 8

Yawn: it IS your imagination.
Any one of these were to walk up to you on the street, you’d think you died and went to heaven

# 9

wow. these girls are so hot! i cant handle it!

I never said these girls weren’t beautiful. I’m sure that in person, they look even better. Still, I repeat that they are nothing like the models 20 years ago. They’re not the same caliber. And #6 above is right on too. Yea, most of these models haven’t gotten their teeth fixed. The 3rd one from the left especially doesn’t have pretty teeth and I’ve seen her many times in in the pages of Victoria’s Secret.

Maniston Fans: MOVE ON @ 04/20/2007 at 7:19 pm

BTW, The World’s Next Top Models are on the cover of May US Vogue!!!!

http://www.thefashionspot.com/forums/f78/us-vogue-may-2007-worlds-next-top-models-55505.html

Not to care for philosophy is to be a true philosopher. Not to care for a double Mac, is to be truly stupid.

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here