Top Stories

Katie Holmes Designs Dresses

Katie Holmes Designs Dresses

Since when did Katie Holmes design clothes? Katie, 28, made a quick run to a fabric store in West Hollywood and carried around — what looks like — the drawing of a future dress design that she might wear.

(Images via FlynetOnline)

Just Jared on Facebook
katie holmes dress design 01
katie holmes dress design 02
katie holmes dress design 03
katie holmes dress design 04

Posted to: Katie Holmes

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Chris Brown is throwing an extremely lavish 4th birthday party for his daughter Royalty - TMZ
  • Kylie Jenner just bought her biggest fan a $2,000 birthday gift - Just Jared Jr
  • Vanessa Williams shares photo of lookalike daughter Sasha getting ready for prom - TooFab
  • The sketches inside Harvey Weinstein's courtroom have been revealed - The Hollywood Reporter
  • Is there a secret message in Taylor Swift's 2018 BBMAs dress?- Just Jared Jr
  • First?

    I feel bad that she’s become so fug!!!!! But, I’m glad that fickle Tom got what was coming his way!!!

  • kmillz


  • Sue

    Tom probably designed it for her. Hope she makes it home in time for curfew!

  • Pett Malon

    you´re so funny Sue, it´s a pitty that you have no other way of letting your fustration out! Get a live, envy is not healthy!

    Katie is one of the nicest celebs out there and a very strong willed woman.

  • How to start a clothing line from scratch

    katie is nice!!!

  • Sue

    Yes, Pett Malon, you are far superior to me. That’s why you’re posting on a message board about your love for a stranger’s baby. Obsession is not healthy!

  • David

    Katie is empty and futile.

    Katie and Vitoria form a beautiful couple, Tom and David also.

  • Roco

    I really like KAtie!!!!! She seems very sweet and humble!
    She does not look her best here, but she´s def. a natural beauty!

  • Eli

    I actually met Katie once and she was one of the kindest celebrities I’ve ever met, so I like her a lot.
    but I don’t like at all the dress in the drawing.

  • kidi

    The dress design is for Tom.

  • koolkat

    I guess she hate Posh Spice’s taste. I never understood why she hired her as her personal stylist

  • Mummy

    The drawing looks like a design for a child’s dress. Has anyone ever thought that maybe she would be getting something original for Suri to wear for her birthday coming up soon?

  • KittyKat

    Mummy- I think a lot of us don’t care about who or what the dress is all about!!!! Katie looks miserable!!! Paparazzi suck!!!

  • Randi

    She should be carrying a sign that says “Help me! My baby and I are being held prisoner by a cult of self important celebrities!”

  • Randi

    Sue Says:

    March 5th, 2007 at 5:27 pm – flag comment
    Tom probably designed it for her. Hope she makes it home in time for curfew!

    I’m with you Sue. The point of gossip sights is to make amusing snarky comments, and yours was both.

  • Metoooo

    Go hug your ALIEN baby :P!

  • the truth

    Katie is a robot, operated by remote control.
    sad, very sad…

  • mia farrow

    give back my child!!!


  • Caroline

    I like Katie, but every day she spends with her alien husband, the less lively she seems… I feel bad for her, really – her marriage is becoming something of a cult (a division of scientology, no less). She’s better off without Tom. But I hate saying that now that they have a baby. Speaking of Suri – she’s almost 1 year old! Time sure flies…

  • Observer

    I think people (some) are mean, especially those who say bad things about Suri for no reason.

    I think it’s nice to see her out in casual clothes for a change, especially when she looks normal like any other regular woman on earth.

  • New York Pundit

    Tom Cruise knows about dresses, and you don’t. tom has read many books on dresses, and as an OTIII, he has discovered that in reality there is no dress.

  • Ex

    A lot of idiots writing childish irrelevant commetns here,no one cares about your venom.She is a beautiful young woman,with great life.

  • Randi

    Ex Says:

    March 5th, 2007 at 9:49 pm – flag comment
    A lot of idiots writing childish irrelevant commetns here,no one cares about your venom.She is a beautiful young woman,with great life.

    Learn to spell idiot.

  • Diana Crabtree

    Staged publicity shots make me smile

  • gia

    the horror! she needs to worship at the Posh Beckham altar of style for much-much longer b/f ever attempting to design even an apron.

  • Dirty Denise

    Shop ’till you drop Katie. I would be doing the same thing. YOU GO GIRL!

  • queenofkhaos

    Mainly for fans of rock and things of the sort.
    My latest post is about Avril Lavigne

  • Woman

    I alwys root for Katie. I am all for support Good, and abhor evil. So am defianitely always rooting for this girl. Thought she can’t draw. Read somewhere that she knits.

    Read this article some of you haters, but do not do a Redstone, we won’t have you back.


    The restart of a beautiful friendship?

    They should have driven a stake through his heart. Just six months after Tom Cruise, who once played the vampire Lestat, was apparently killed off by the head of Paramount Studios and dismissed as history by Hollywood pundits, he’s back, undead and more powerful than ever.

    So powerful, in fact, that the man who caused a furore in Hollywood last August by cancelling Cruise’s $10m-a-year production deal with Paramount now wants to be friends again.

    Back in August, Sumner Redstone (right, with Cruise), the elderly chairman of Viacom, which owns Paramount, called the actor’s behaviour “inappropriate” and said “his recent conduct has not been acceptable to Paramount”.

    He was referring to Cruise’s proselytising for the Church of Scientology, his denunciations of psychiatry and his notorious ‘couch- jumping’ on the Oprah Winfrey Show when he declared his love for his fiancee – now wife – Katie Holmes.

    Redstone blamed those incidents, which caused Cruise to plummet in the public’s affections, for what many saw as the weak box-office performance of Mission: impossible: III, which grossed just $134m in the US, $81m less than the previous film in the series.

    The dumping of Cruise made headlines worldwide – but the star wasn’t down for long. In November, in a move which surprised many in Hollywood, Cruise and Paula Wagner, his producing partner, took control of United Artists, the venerable movie studio started in 1919 by actors Charlie Chaplin, Mary Pickford, Douglas Fairbanks and director DW Griffiths.

    In return for running UA and producing around five films a year for it, Cruise and Wagner were givena 33 per cent stake in the studio. They have now started shooting their first film, a $35m thriller called Lions for Lambs, directed by Robert Redford and starring Cruise, Redford and Meryl Streep. And Redstone, seeing one of Hollywood’s top stars back on top, is now claiming his split with Cruise was all a bit of a mix-up.

    Talking to People magazine, he said: “What happened was I gave an interview to the Wall Street Journal. In the course of it they asked me what was going on. I said, ‘You know, he would no longer be in the lot.’ They treated that like I was firing him. I didn’t fire him! I had nothing to do with it. But they treated it explosively. And I didn’t like it.”

    This is not how Hollywood insiders see it. They say the complaints about Cruise’s personal life were a cover. Redstone wanted to take on Tinseltown’s high-priced ‘talent’ and the powerful agencies like CAA (the Creative Artists Agency) which had long represented Cruise. Paramount barely broke even on Mission: impossible: III, yet Cruise’s lavish production deal meant that he made around $70m from the film.

    The man who stepped in and saved Cruise’s reputation was Harry Evans Sloan, who runs MGM, which owns United Artists. Sloan believes Cruise and Wagner can restore the fortunes of UA, which was once known for films like Gone with the Wind, The Wizard of Oz and Annie Hall, but has recently limped along on profits from the Bond films.

    Tom Cruise remains one of the biggest box-office draws in Hollywood history; films he starred in, including Mission: impossible and Collateral, generated more than $2.5bn for Paramount during his 14 years at the studio. Sloan knows that, and it looks like Redstone has suddenly remembered it too.

    Rude boy should go and stuff it! Loser

  • Liz

    Whatever people say, this couple is beautiful and they have a good thing going.

  • Lu Lu

    Anyone know who her coat is designed by? I love it!

  • julie

    “Woman” nice article but you do not have to go out of your way to post this epistle he’s being sacked simple by the biggest ever movie production company nothing anyone say or does will change anything and regarding his new job with UA well he can still make some money which they need so desprately not just the type Paramount needs and with all the fuss generated when he was sacked Redstone just wants to bury the hatchet and move on not employ him back(thank God) which is the least he can do i mean they worked together for 15 yrs as for KH we all know her reasons for being been with him and him with her just now he prefers his fantasy girl(JESSICA ALBA) to her i mean he did interview her to be his girlfriend b/4 his pple read KH’S so called interview and he had to settle for her seriously who in her right mind would date let alone sleep with that man

  • streamy

    Hey, Trying to view this website on an EVO 4G and am having issues. I can’t get the images to load right. Just wanted you to know, Cheers!

  • orlando seo

    UGH!I did a really long response to your post but my internet crapped out and I lost it all! Oh well, just wanted to say that it was a great post! Great job! Does the Age of a Domain Matter in SEO?