Top Stories

Jenna Fischer: Nude in 'Wired'

Jenna Fischer: Nude in 'Wired'


Every Dunderhead is going to get Wired over these!

Jenna Fischer, aka Pam Beesly from The Office, drops her clothes and gets naked as the cover girl for the April 2007 issue of Wired. Here’s the blurb naked Jenna is holding up in her cover shot:

GET NAKED AND RULE THE WORLD Smart companies are sharing secrets with rivals, blogging about products in their pipeline, even admitting to their failures. The name of this new game is radical transparency, and it’s sweeping boardrooms across the nation. Even those Office drones at Dunder Mifflin get it. So strip down and learn how to have it all by baring it all.

If you’ll notice, Jenna‘s face in identical in both cover shots. The million dollar question — did Jenna pose nude or did the Wired staff digitally undress her. “Radical Transparency,” perhaps?

Read the full Wired Dunder Mifflin case study below!

Like Just Jared on Facebook
jenna fischer nude 01
jenna fischer nude 02
jenna fischer nude 03
jenna fischer nude 04
jenna fischer nude 05

JJ Links Around The Web

Wenn
  • Jenny McCarthy gives her thoughts on Rosie O'Donnell joining The View- US Weekly
  • Chris Brown and Drake are collaborating on a track together- TMZ
  • Cory Monteith's dad opens up on his death after one year- Gossip Cop
  • Luke Mitchell has signed on to star in Members Only- Just Jared Jr
  • Game of Thrones' Rose Leslie is joining Vin Diesel project- Entertainment Weekly
  • Orange is the New Black's Kate Mulgrew talks about her Emmy nomination- Huffington Post
  • When will Blake Lively go live with her new lifestyle website?- Lainey Gossip
  • Dawn of the Planet of the Apes director Matt Reeves talks about focusing the film on Caesar- The Hollywood Reporter
  • Mariel Booth shows off her bikini body- Hollywood Tuna

38 Comments

# 1

Regardless of whether it is actually her body or not, I think it’s quite clear they’re supposed to be the same headshot since the clothes are superimposed over the body shot.

# 2

Her face looks completely uncomfortable in that shot. Her face must hurt!

# 3

This frumpy hag looks no better, even with the airbrushing and camara filters… Yak!

# 4

If you look at the first picture, the fingers on her right hand are kinda..distorted…

# 5

You can peel off the suit.

# 6

The put the clothes on the nude body. You can see on top that her skin goes beyond the vest where her soulders are. Was that doe by an amateur??

# 8

she’s a pretty girl. why in the world did they work her over so much with photoshop that it practically looks like an ILLUSTRATION!

# 9

Umm yea the clothes printed on a clear sheet over the behind cover. It’s not a crappy photoshop job, it’s crappy alignment.

You can see the white dots on the left side of the unclothed version, indicating that the overlay was torn off. Clever though.

This is really sad. 1) she’s not very attractive 2) she’s not nude 3) who the hell cares?

She’s not really attractive in those photos, she looks ordinary in the show..but the pictures are pretty badly photoshopped (notice that on her right arm -near the elbow) there’s a light source facing towards her elbow). Then if you look at her left and right shoulder the lighting is completely skewed.

HardwareGuy @ 03/22/2007 at 2:37 pm

That woman is pegging the cute scale!

toaster91 @ 03/22/2007 at 3:17 pm

Did it occur to you that it might be a crappy photoshop on purpose? They’re making it clear the clothes are an overlay.

Bad Photoshop job? Are you people dense? The clothes were not “Photoshopped” on – the cover shows her “nude” and the clothes are printed on a clear acetate sheet laid on top. You can remove the acetate to “take her clothes off”…

Can’t see any vitals and the resolution is too low to
smell anything.

i’m inclined to agree that it’s bad photoshop on purpose. the way her sleeve is cut around the hand is so bad as to be a joke, c’mon.

–adam

…well, you can’t tell it’s acetate in the photos. someone should have mentioned that…say…in the blog post. kind of makes the whole controversy a nonstory…

Oh you people!!! The Wired cover of Jenna is two photographs; one in which she is wearing the suit, the other she was nude except for the strategically placed board.

@ajpiano

Actually, it’s quite easy to tell that it’s an acetate overlay.

1) You can see the blobs of silicone glue along the left side in the first pic, connecting the sheet to the “real” cover. Again, on the second pic, you can see the ripped paper when the person scanning the cover tore off the acetate.

2) The misregistration around her fingers is a clear tell-tale sign of an overlay.

3) You can see the shadow cast by the words “GE” and “Nintendo” at the top, which are printed on the overlay.

4) The skin on her shoulder sticks out from under the clothes. Come on now… do you really think ANY graphic artist would do such a lousy job? That goes way beyond bad Photoshop, that’s simply retarded. Even the most unexperienced photo retoucher would know to erase that bit.

Yikes! It was done on purpose.

reminded me to renew my zinio subbscriptions …
wired is kewl …

Dude, if you are that into her, she shows her tits in “employee of the month” Duh

At first i thought it was some sort of fold-out, but the clear acetate is genius. Just wondering how much its going to cost to produce all those mags?

Lukasiewich @ 03/22/2007 at 9:18 pm

Jenna would be hot if she didn’t have those nasty front teeth and matronly “shrug shoulders”. She needs some pilates to stretch out her muscles, then she wouldn’t look so “frumpy” like someone else mentioned.

Moe Golden @ 03/22/2007 at 10:02 pm

jenna really is a lovely girl. the pam character is, by design, dowdy, frumpy and average, even if cute.

maybe i’m in the minority among folks here, but i’d prefer a jenna fischer to a pamela anderson-type any day.

It’s either she was dressed during the photoshoot then digitally undressed later, or she was naked during the photoshoot then digitally dressed. Either way, we get to see how hot she is, and that’s good enough for me.

snooore…zzzzzz….snooore…. huh. huh….. what? zzzzzzzzzz……. snooooore

she doesn’t need all of that makeup – she’s a natural beauty. the best part about jenna is who she is as a person. it comes through in interviews, and in the radio shows she’s done. and let’s not forget she’s hilarious… very underrated on “the office.” as great as carell is, the show would not be the same without rainn and jenna. now can we just skip ahead to the season finale and get season three out on dvd please?

Everyone of you criticizing this girl best run back to your hobbit holes and get your online gaming on.
This girl is a super hotty, super funny, and on the best show on television. You should want to cut off at least 3 toes to have a chance with a girl like that.

I think it was a good article over all. I do have an FYI for NY Pundit- sir, you truly do have a gifted insight on the frumpy hags. I discovered this the instant I viewed your profile page and saw the photo of you and your wife. Namaste my friend.

That’s IT, I am going into photography

Martin J Van Keuren @ 03/16/2008 at 2:50 pm

no mams no fur…..boring.

I’ve truly discovered out a lot studying this page. Clearly extremely good content right here. Content material comparable to this aid make this blog site worth coming back to for even additional details

Love Jenna Fischer and LOVED her in A LITTLE HELP. Check out the FB page at https://www.facebook.com/ALittleHelp

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here