Top Stories

Michael Jackson Mania

Michael Jackson Mania

Michael Jackson and his three children return to Los Angeles on Wednesday night after a two week trip to Japan and England.

Paris, Prince, and Michael II wore caps and covered their faces with black sheets while Jacko greeted fans and signed autographs.

For more pictures of Michael Jackson, 48, and his kids, CLICK HERE!

Like Just Jared on Facebook
michael jackson kids 01
michael jackson kids 02
michael jackson kids 03
michael jackson kids 04
michael jackson kids 05
michael jackson kids 06
michael jackson kids 07
michael jackson kids 08
michael jackson kids 09
michael jackson kids 10
michael jackson kids 11
michael jackson kids 12
michael jackson kids 13
michael jackson kids 14
michael jackson kids 15
michael jackson kids 16
michael jackson kids 17
michael jackson kids 18

JJ Links Around The Web

Jason Merritt/Getty

52 Responses to “Michael Jackson Mania”

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All

  1. 1
    Jade Says:

    Strange how he makes his kids cover their faces, I know he thinks he’s protecting them from the paparazzi, but IMO those kids are getting too old to be wearing masks 24/7 in public.

  2. 2
    michaelmaximus Says:

    He`s just a dad trying to protect his kids.I love you Michael and I`m glad you and your kids got home safe.

  3. 3
    Nina Says:

    They don´t wear masks 24/7 in public. Just when they are in public with him. Nobody really knows how they look like, so that they can move around with their friends and so without having paparazzi following them. It´s actually very clever…

  4. 4
    New York Pundit Says:

    I wonder how much “Jesus Juice Play” The Prince, and Mikey 2 get out of their Daddyphile…?

  5. 5
    aw Says:

    Those poor kids. They shouldn’t be ashamed to show their faces.
    They are going to be bothered by the paps whether they cover there faces of not so i see no point in having to wear masks. It would be better to try to act normal and make the best of it.

  6. 6
    jennifer Says:

    I like Michael…he’s crazy but no bad person…actually he donates very much money,etc..and he makes VERY good music…and he loves his children…his kids have a privileged live…so why is there so much drama?!

  7. 7
    aveeno Says:

    Nina Says:
    March 22nd, 2007 at 10:54 am
    You’re right, that’s the part people refuse to acknowledge. Those kids have been out without their dad, all without masks and with friends without any disturbance from paparrazzi’s purely because whenever they’re with their dad they’re covered. He’s just a dad trying to protect his kids..

    Paris is such a daddy’s little girls, she’s always been so so so attached to her dad its so cute to see. The hat she’s wearing was given to her recently by Michael’s fans in London. And the toy that “blacket” is holding was also given to him by a fan….

    Prince is going to be a tall guy. He’s just ten but looks like he’s 13 or 15yrs old and protective of his little brother.

  8. 8
    mercredi Says:

    Poor children! Living with a pedophile and now this.

  9. 9
    Sarah Says:

    I may completely be missing the mark here, but are those his biological children? I thought so, but their hands are whiter than white! Has he passed on his condition to his kids?

  10. 10
    Fleasha Says:

    Seriously, couldn’t he just have them put on Zorro eye masks? Just because daddy mastered the art of breathing through a tiny plastic schnozz, it doesn’t mean it would be any easier for the kids to breathe with effing fabric enveloping their effing heads!

  11. 11
    Jan Says:

    Look at Boris Becker’s children.

    One (Anna Ermakova) ist also more than white. And the mother is black. So all genes from the father, none from the mother.

    Same with Michael. All genes from Debbie and none from Michael. That’s why they’re white.

  12. 12
    Danny Says:

    He looks wonderful. Really, really hot. I love it when he’s smiling, it’s pure magic. Hope, he will visit Neverland for the first time after 2005…

    Paris, Prince and Blanket are really cute and it seems to be that Paris is already a little young lady. I think, it must have been really difficult for Michael deciding for a kind of protection. His decision, to cover his children’s faces when they are together with him, is the best for the 3 in my eyes. When the world would known their faces – they couldn’t go anywhere without having paparazzi around them. It was a good desicion and I can understand Michael why he do this. He only want to protect his children, they should never make the same experiences he made in childhood and make until today. We all should accept it.

  13. 13
    angelina_mmm Says:

    I don’t think that they are his kids.

  14. 14
    Grievous Says:

    Michael is back and innocent.

  15. 15
    DePaul Says:

    About the children’s masks, I think it’s a smart move actually even if I don’t agree with everything he does. When the children go out in public with someone other than Jackson (like their nannies), they can still lead relatively normal lives without the fear of being stalked and photographed by the paps hiding in bushes. Nobody but the diehards would ever recognize those children without masks, so nobody would think twice about them unless Michael Jackson was around and they had their trademark masks/veils on. Too bad I saw that one paparazzi outlet still outed them them in Vegas when they were out and about with the nanny and no masks, but overall I think the method works and nobody knows how often these kids get out and do regular kid stuff.

    And I’ve read countless compliments about Michael’s parenting skills from those who actually spent a lot of time staying with MJ and his family. Even Martin Bashir himself was full of praises and approval about Michael’s parenting in the hours of outtakes that were cut from the televised special but were shown in court and on Fox or some other network.

  16. 16
    JiJi Says:

    Covering the kids is a good idea IMO. it has helped them get around freely when he’s not with them. I can only remember 3 times that they were photographed alone without their dad and that is a relevantly small number compared to how many times they would be followed if the press actually knew what they looked like.

  17. 17
    Amy Says:

    GAWD, I hate when people say this man is a pedophile. While he’s evidently lost most of his marbles, he ain’t pedo. That’s R. Kelly’s ground. He’s not a bad person, just very, very eccentric. With that being said, his face still creeps me out, and he needs to let those kids of his out for air sometimes. I mean, I understand wanting to protect children from all the cameras and stuff, but they just look like damn fools with the veils over their faces. Mike’s the one who needs to walk around with a bag over his mug.

  18. 18
    mischa Says:

    Though it does seem strange at first, after a second thought the idea of covering his kids 24/7 when they’re with him is actually quite clever. They get to have a fairly normal life without paparazzi stalking them all the time. I’m just afraid they’ll get to know their looks eventually. Too much sniffing around and too much money involved to let such a treat pass.

  19. 19
    BC Says:

    I love him.
    That’s all I can say about Michael Jackson.

    The press and the ignorant haters won’t stop him.

  20. 20
    Jade Says:

    Give me a break! What, is he still gonna make them cover their faces at 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, years old????? Maybe he thinks its helping them out in the present, but when their older and look back at their childhood, they’ll always remember hiding their faces and I think that is a shame! and if the paparazzi wanted to find and stalk his kids they would and could. The masks aren’t doing anything but hurting the kids in the long run.

  21. 21
    Anne Says:

    It makes no sense that the kid’s faces are covered. The one paparazzi shot that exists from them (a few months back on LA airport without them covered prooves that they don’t look like him at all and they wouldn’t be recognised as being his kids when they are in public WITHOUT Michael Jackson. the point is that nobody knows anything about their regular daily routine (playing with friends, going to school, having friends their age and hobbies). Jackson’s intent to keep everyone about this in the dark makes it very suspicious that something is rotten in the state of Denmark…

    There are other ways to bring up children if mother or father are or happen to be celebrities and most of them do seem to work out fairly, but Jackson just refuses to acknowledge any of them and still thinks he is the bees knees in bringing children up in a celebrity envrionment – that is just delusion at its highest, not responsible parenting.

  22. 22
    JiJi Says:

    Michael has said it a million times. He wants it to be his children’s choice if they want to be in the public eye or not. So I’m sure when they grow up a little he’ll let them decide for themselves.

    And those children are very well adjusted from what I’ve seen. I saw them shopping in Dubai with Michael last year. Michael was the one in disguise and the kids weren’t covered at all. I talked to Michael and Paris. They all seemed like happy, polite children.

    They were very social and loving too. I gave them a stuffed teddy bear toy and the two older kids hugged me and said thank you.

  23. 23
    Jade Says:

    Yeah, but by the time they grow up they will be so used to having their faces covered, it will seem normal to them, when in fact, it is not NORMAL, so they most likely will be walking around with masks on as adults, much like their father does as an adult himself! Also, I never said they weren’t good kids, (most kids are indeed loving and good kids), But I still think it is a shame when their older and look back at their childhood, they’ll always remember hiding their faces! It’s not right! Come on’ what other celebrity makes their school age child wear a mask??? It’s strange & weird! Poor kids!

  24. 24
    JiJi Says:

    I know you didn’t say they were bad kids, but I mean that they were acting completely normal. Even better than normal kids honestly. They were very energetic. Especially the little girl. They seemed really happy, they laughed a lot but at the same time, they weren’t driving their nannies crazy and they were very polite.

    And you know, Michael only the past couple of years started taking them out in public like this. And they are only covered for the walk out and they are uncovered when they are inside the car. So it’s really only a matter of minutes that they are covered. Unless they go shopping and there are cameras around of course. but that rarely happens.

    When they were children, they were rarely seen with him. The only pictures you’d be able to find are of them being carried in and out of cars and in and out of hotels, that was pretty much it.

    A lot of fans have met those children when they were covered. I think they understand the reasons they are being covered and they are comfortable with it, but I seriously doubt that they are going to be like you said Jade. They are simply not covered up as much as everyone believes they are.

    In a whole year, you would only see pictures from 5 or 6 different days out of a year max. and most times it’s even less than that. So they’re not covered up that much really. Just when they’re out with their father and they know there are cameras around.

  25. 25
    Spirit Says:

    I ccan’t understand why other people are always butting in Michael’s business. Those are his CHILDREN and what he sas goes. He is the parent! A good one at that.
    If you can say somwthing nice shut UP!

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here