OlderHayden Panettiere - "FHM" UK August 2007
She’s the cheerleader from sci-fi hit Heroes — and now the hot cover star of FHM‘s UK October issue. At the young age of 17, the sexiest girl from the world’s biggest show will be to be continued in October’s British FHM…
Like Just Jared on Facebook
38 Comments
she looks good but isnt she 17? i’ll wait till next year to express my feelings
the make-up do miracles!
she looks good!
at 18 years old, who woould you prefer, hayden or emma watson? i’d go with watson
Well fantastic, another briney spears in the making…she is only 17!!!! That is way to young to be slu ting your self out, actually no age is appropriate to be slu ting yourself out!
she is so awesome i like totally love her oxoxoxoxox!!
FYI, she’ll be 18 in a few weeks. I think she’s got a better head on her shoulders than Britney, at least I hope so!
PHOTOSHOPPED AND RETOUCHED TO DEATH! Another one sellin the goods and lookin happy to do it.Under age and lookin 25..Can we say Lilo in the making..This girl’s mom is another Dina Lohan,she will get worse.We all know Hayden’s real head is a large as a water-melon and her 4head is as wide as a map. Advertising for the perv’s to watch.
She is so spears, and Lohan in her i can’t wait to see her in rehab or get hock up. only time will tell.
for sure watson
so pretty
Apple-Head-2 is really going after Scarlett’s crown.
I hate to say it, and I feel like a complete pervert, but Emma Watson is sooo fcuking fcukable. Lol
Can’t believe she’s my age, she’s so hot. haha.
Grr I HATE PHOTO SHOP, hes Pretty without that crap!!! She really Don’t look 17 here (sigh)..
That looks nothing like her! Stupid Photoshop.
her arm is so photoshopped :D hahahah i laughed so hard when i saw this! she looks like10 pounds lighter!
she looks really good and that’s all because of all the retouching she got. im sure she’s a beautiful person in life but she does seem like a lindsay lohan…maybe a hotter lindsay lohan? anyhow, to answer tim’s question, i’ll definitely go for emma. emma made it to the top on her own, she’s talented and gorgeous.
She’s so hot in this picture, I’m shocked! :o
Anyway, yeah, Emma’s definitely more attractive than her…
Make up really does do miracles, the previous thread about her, she looks like a potato head.
She looks good and alive and not so photoshopped as those covers tend to be…
isnt she a bit young to do this? The girl is pretty, but ****** for sure..
Hot as hell but photoshopped :P
17 for less than a month. Boys can start counting down.
And Famous, that is perverted, she’s 16 and not even played up as a sex symbol like Hayden
16 is the legal age in Britain, in there eyes she has been legal for nearly two years.
She looks photoshopped. She’s a pretty girl, but she’s not hot or beautiful to me (even this photoshopped). And at 17 and already posing in men’s magazines with the sex kitten look on her face, she’s just sad.
Ha Ha Ha! A re-touched-airbrushed photo shop job to, look 10 pounds lighter trolly!
I can’t believe she chose that s k a n k y mag to do the sexy pics in…geez Hayden, I’m pretty sure you know there are different degrees of guys’ mags! Just ask your male co-stars! Then again, maybe she did and they advised her to go for the lowest common denominator…that’ll get her literally exposed more quickly! Oh well, and I thought she was doing pretty good… :lol:
Pages: [1] 2 » Show All
Comment and Share!