OlderMaggie Gyllenhaal in Lingerie
Maggie Gyllenhaal strips down to her lingerie as the new face (and body) for lingerie line Agent Provocateur.
Serena Rees, co-founder of Agent Provocateur, said: “Maggie is not an obvious sex symbol. She is interesting looking, confident and beautiful in a way that is non-threatening, which makes her appealing to men and women alike.”
Maggie, 29, replaced supermodel Kate Moss as Provocateur spokesmodel.
DOES MAGGIE’S AD CAMPAIGN make you wanna go out and buy Agent Provocateur?
Like Just Jared on Facebook
180 Comments
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeew
i love maggie.she’s really beautiful.i love her as actress too.his movie with the beautiful juliane moore rocks too………
lol, at the pic of her in the chair..she looks like an old lady
I think these pics are great. I especially like the one in the chair, it screams “CLASS.” Not: “buy me, so I can look like a hoe.”
I especially love that morning gown! I might even buy it, if I just find a place that sells them. :)
Woooooo, what’s this?!!!
she is a great actress, amazing, but she doesn’t have a beautiful face
meh shes not that great looking
a very unfortunate looking girl that seems to be quit enice.
always fascinating to see siblings where one is stunning (jake) and then one not so cute (maggie). particularly unfortunate because she is the girl and you always want the girl to be hot not the son.
Sorry but she’s ugly and has a horrible shape. Next.
fourth photo: can it be any uglier?!
“DOES MAGGIE’S AD CAMPAIGN make you wanna go out and buy Agent Provocateur?”
Nope. Sorry.
I don’t know how I feel about this. She’s pretty enough, but a “girl next door” kinda pretty… not the lingerie type at all!
She’s scary UGLY!
She is one ugly woman!
Wow – I really like her – I think she is adorable – but whomever released that first photo of her in the chair should be shot. She looks SIXTY.
Maggie has a great gamine face – classic. Why they beat it with heavy 40s makeup is beyond me. It does not work. It really, really, really does NOT work.
Definatly not
great actress, hot body but not a pretty face.
Shudder. I actually like her for not being the pretty hollywood girl, but looking like a real woman. I don’t think she or Jake are especially good looking. In fact, the look in Jake’s eyes creeps me out.
But I digress.
WHatever stylist worked on this photo shoot should be fired. Too much muck, cheap, tarty, tacky …
And that make-up …. she could give Morticia Addams a run for her money.
Creepyyyyyyyyy.
is this lingerie line for older women?? maggie doesn’t look good. not for this ad. now i wouldn’t buy agent provocateur..
i’ll stick with my bloomers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I like her as an actress and she seems really nice but i’m sorry: she’s ugly! I don’t understand what’s going on with her lately: Batman’s love interest + AP?? come on!
And to answer your question Jared: it’s a big NO, if i buy this kind of lingerie it’s to feel sexy and pretty not to look like Maggie.
I think she is talented actress
But I don’t like these photos at all!
I must says, Kate was better
Maggie looks great in these ads. I love the old glamor look of them. It’s very reminiscent of the 30′s and 40′s. My favorite is the one she’s wearing the turban.
I feel bad for saying this but she’s really ugly :(
She looks hot esp for just having a baby – her man is hot hot hot!
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 … 8 » Show All
Comment and Share!