Top Stories

John Moynahan: Bridget's Baby Boy

John Moynahan: Bridget's Baby Boy

Bridget Moynahan and 5-week-old son John Edward Thomas Moynahan take this week’s cover of OK! magazine, on newsstands Friday.

According to USA Today, “Moynahan, 36, split last December from her NFL beau and baby-daddy Tom Brady, 30, but he was on hand when the actress gave birth in California Aug. 22 and spent a few days with mother and son. Brady is now dating Brazilian model (and Leonardo DiCaprio ex) Gisele Bundchen, 27.”

Moynahan declined to be interviewed, so there will be no Q&A snippets. BOO!

Is baby John Moynahan cute — YES or YES?

Like Just Jared on Facebook

JJ Links Around The Web

Ethan Miller/Getty

73 Comments

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 » Show All

hes adorable and everyone needs to shut up cause no one has any idea what went on between them, so how can you possibly take sides… he a really cute baby, just be happy about the new life .

She’s beautiful inside and out. And so is John. Team Bridget.

Yes, Yes! What personality in the little face!

It maybe wise she did not provide an interview . . . media nowadays just wants something to distort and they can distort anything, even the most harmless comments. TOO much irresponsible media.

The baby is a huge baby for only 5 weeks!!! Tom Brady is 6’4 and Bridget is no midget either – she is nearly 5’10.

And you are right Michelle – - too bad he didn’t inherit Bridget’s good looks!!

Bridget Moynahan has a smart publicist. Just Photos. No Words.

She’s been a recent regular on the photo-gossip sites, so this magazine cover is a step up.

But it’s smart to not allow Bridget to be interviewed. Once she starts talking she’ll probably out herself as a bitter hateful woman, much like what is happening with Denise Richards and her played out press-attacks on Charlie Sheen.

not cute now but could grow up to be cute. it’s rare that babies this young are really adorable. they’re still wrinkly and crumpled up looking.

wow! this is a big baby!

What an adorable little boy!

I hated her on Sex and the City :))

John Brady looks just like his daddy!!!

Purple Gem @ 09/26/2007 at 2:04 am

Couple of comments:
1) The baby is huge and adorable.
2) Bridget looks great.
3) Tom Brady is kicking major butt in the NFL. He’s an awesome QB and its just a bonus he’s super hot.
4) I really liked Tom and Bridget as a couple but obviously they couldnt work things out so I hope both parties are happy.
5) Bridget > Gisele

The baby look like Dad, ironic , isn’t it ?

Beautiful. beautiful!

What a stupid move! Why be photographed for the cover and not give an interview. Another ***** pimping out an unwanted baby. You know why she had this kid….to spite Tom Brady and to get those big child support payments. She pissed off Tom by giving this kid J.E.T. initials. That’s a bad pic too. She’s not smiling and the baby is not looking up. I bet she hates the baby and is just using it to get attention and money. There are times when an abortion is needed. I feel bad for the baby growing up in a single mother house. No father…they weren’t even married.

brady bunch @ 09/26/2007 at 3:10 am

he looks like bobby hill from king of the hill or maybe a little midget? he is so big for 5 weeks. did she really have a baby? she looks pathetic. tell me, why is everyone so mad at giselle? she did nothing wrong but scoop up a single man. what women wouldn’t want to date tom brady? leave her alone! she did not steal tom like angie stole brad! that’s who you should be pissed at!!!

She’s bitter because she thought that by getting pregnant Tom would marry her but it backfired. Bitter, greedy woman.

She is beautiful and independent, she doesnt need a QB hanging about. GOOD for her!

And this baby is big and so cute. awwwwww.

39 Poop : 09/26/2007 at 2:39 am

What a stupid move! Why be photographed for the cover and not give an interview. Another ***** pimping out an unwanted baby. You know why she had this kid….to spite Tom Brady and to get those big child support payments. She pissed off Tom by giving this kid J.E.T. initials. That’s a bad pic too. She’s not smiling and the baby is not looking up. I bet she hates the baby and is just using it to get attention and money. There are times when an abortion is needed. I feel bad for the baby growing up in a single mother house. No father…they weren’t even married.

Your statement is harsh and uncalled for. You should’ve been aborted.

JustJaded @ 09/26/2007 at 7:47 am

I thought for sure People magazine or one of the major print media would get the pics.

I’m also very surprised there was no interview, why do the photo shoot and then have your friends, unnamed friends, speak for you and give generic quotes? I think that is odd.

The baby is cute. Hopefully he will grow into his looks even more. I, too, was hoping the baby would look more like his mom, although he does have her eye shape.

According to the Boston papers, Bridget was paid over $100,000 for the photos, and donated all of it to several children’s charities. Good for her! John would have been snapped by the paps anyway, and this way some money goes to good causes. Both mom and son are precious and I wish them all the best.

what is wrong with you people? Chances are she had the baby because she doesn’t believe in abortion (like you animals). Having a child is a huge responsibility – I can’t see child support payments being anyones motive to completely alter their life taking care of a baby that they resent and don’t even want. DO you even know how dumb half of you sound. Bunch of bitter bettys! That baby is cute. Not sure who he looks like but it’s nice to see how healthy he is and to see him supporting his head. She probably should’ve given an interview – it would’ve made more sense. And she should’ve went with People mag vs OK magazine. I guess she went with whoever gave her the opportunity. She is also very pretty – I think she’s more attractive than Giselle. Who did she play on sex and the city? I can’t remember. She will find a new man and she will be fine. Tom should just continue to do the right thing and be a part of his sons life.

He is a beautiful little boy and Bridget looks just great. I wish them all the very best. As for all the comments “she deliberately got pregnant”, “is after his money” etc. etc., really does anyone actually believe that rubbish. She and Tom were in a long-term relationship and she got pregnant – it happens and the man has as much responsibility as the woman in such a case! It must have been extremely difficult for her but, as far as I know, Bridget has acted with great dignity throughout this time – and all credit to her.

The pregnancy was most likely an accident but Bridget probably figured that she’s in her late 30s and her baby clock is ticking…and Brady’s got great genes…and she’s ready for motherhood so why not have the baby?

It’s an awkward situation, but it was her decision, and this is what “choice” is about.

The baby’s cute, he looks older than 5 weeks.

madingley @ 09/26/2007 at 9:31 am

baby is too big as his age.dont you think so?

By the way, people posing for magazine photos have no say as to which photos are published. It’s the editors’ pick. Photographers usually take dozens of pictures, then the editors choose which ones wind up in the magazine.

It’s interesting they picked one showing Bridget looking serious and serene, instead of the usual smiling “new baby” shot. The baby is too young to smile, isn’t he?

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here