Top Stories

Rachel Bilson Is Waiting At The Airport

Rachel Bilson Is Waiting At The Airport

Rachel Bilson goes through routine airport seucrity and then prepares for departure at Los Angeles International Airport on Saturday.

Bilson, 27, chatted briefly with some fans as she was going through airport security. She was also friendly with the airport security officer when asked for her passport.

The former O.C. star will soon be traveling to Salt Lake City, Utah, where she is scheduled to begin filming Waiting for Forever.

Earlier this week, Rachel was spotted leaving her home and heading to an LA studio.

Like Just Jared on Facebook
rachel bilson lax 01
rachel bilson lax 02
rachel bilson lax 03
rachel bilson lax 04
rachel bilson lax 05
rachel bilson lax 06

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Adam Goldberg expecting baby with girlfriend Roxanne Daner- US Weekly
  • Chris Brown and Karrueche Tran flipped their relationship back to on- TMZ
  • The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies set to win post-Christmas box office- Gossip Cop
  • R5 celebrates the holidays with hockey and snow- Just Jared Jr
  • 40 most shocking moments of television in 2014- Entertainment Weekly
  • Hollywood's most influential costume designer vies for another Oscar nod- Huffington Post
  • The Entourage movie is just around the corner- Lainey Gossip
  • Could Nightcrawler be the Crash of this season?- The Hollywood Reporter

123 Responses to “Rachel Bilson Is Waiting At The Airport”

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] Show All

  1. 101
    bristol santa ana Says:

    Look into Getty Images then! You will see pictures of her there. No Hayden and Gee… ring!

  2. 102
    joie Says:

    Whether it holds up in court or not isn’t the point. It’s ethically wrong but since it’s Rachel Bilson and she’s supposed to be cute and adorable she’s allowed to get away with it. Her fans are willing to make up excuses for her but deep inside they know it’s wrong. The excuse that maybe she had an agreement with the original designer that nobody knows about is just lame.

  3. 103
    joie Says:

    Whether it holds up in court or not isn’t the point. It’s ethically wrong but since it’s Rachel Bilson and she’s supposed to be cute and adorable she’s allowed to get away with it. Her fans are willing to make up excuses for her but deep inside they know it’s wrong. The excuse that maybe she had an agreement with the original designer that nobody knows about is just lame.

  4. 104
    Leah Says:


    I agree. They’re making excuses but it’s wrong. Everyone can tell that it’s basically the same dress. Except it has no studs on the neckline. It’s been talked about on fashion sites for weeks now. So it’s not only people on a gossip site noticing and talking about it. The very people she’s trying to impress don’t like it either. And if she had an agreement with the designer, maybe she should have mentioned in her interviews about the line. What good is an agreement if you’re not mentioning the agreement publicly? The designer isn’t just going to enter into it without getting something out of the deal. And I’m pretty sure that agreement would involve Rachel mentioning and giving some kind of credit to the designer. So that they can get a larger spotlight on their line, raise their status.

    But this is what usually happens with celeb lines. They think that just because they can put an outfit together, that they should come out with a line. Or learning how to sew a skirt is supposed to give them a free pass. It’s done in the fashion world at times, and if they get talked about for it, then so can she.

  5. 105
    lexie Says:

    No proof she did anything ethically wrong either. You don’t have any details from Stretsis and none from Bilson only pics of the dress.


    All I’m saying is that at this time there is only gossip and guessing. It doesn’t mean there won’t be more to come but then again maybe there is nothing to it.

  6. 106
    stef Says:

    Pictures are not gossip, she is in the wrong and is completely liable to the actual designer, and yes, one stolen design is enough to pursue by authorities, they just make deals behind closed doors and it may cost her heavily in the end. One stolen design is plenty of evidence for injunction.

  7. 107
    joie Says:

    Posted By: anon | September 18th, 2008 at 12:07 pm

    yeah im so disgusted that she actually knocked off that yellow dress. the original dress is by a thailand based designer, sretsis who i used to rep in the states and absolutely love. rachel borrowed the dress from their pr office…….. and then she had the nerve to knock it off. really??? the original dress is SO much cuter.
    there is the original dress

    Posted By: Lauren | September 18th, 2008 at 6:37 pm

    Yeah, I’m gonna have to agree with Lauren. That was really graceless of Rachel Bilson (which kind of surprises me cause she seems like the type of girl who you could go out for a pint with and she would be like the anti-Paris celebrity. You know, someone cool and normal). I remember seeing the Stretsis dress and thinking it looked wonderful on her. And was so surprised that an exact replica in yellow showed up in her own line. Now she doesn’t seem as cool and real. Bummer.

  8. 108
    no-kidding-sherlock Says:

    @# 89

    A “warranted” re-post:

    So why the said BFF would wants to see her anew?! He saw enough of her azz face during all the whole year hooplas (gasped!)involved in Jumper. Nothing new to see because as this tart’s exterior & interior hasn’t changed that much.
    Anyways, the BFF is officially back to work for a new movie. He’s been jobless for a long awhile but keeps on doing everything on his OWN or his “MIA” thing all through out of it, so what’s more if there’s another acting job that would occupy more/most of his time?
    I’d say just wait for the NYILY premiere screening next year, as there might be a chance – lol!

  9. 109
    lexie Says:

    Stef, no one said pictures are gossip, not me hun. It’s everyone here who is gossiping, And if what you say turns out to be fact then she should pay. I just don’t believe in crucifying someone without all the facts and even then I’m not sure it warrants a public tar and feathering.

    Joie…Do you believe every post you read on the internet?

  10. 110
    kiim Says:

    OMG, she plagiarized another designer! It’s so obvious!

    That dress is what is called the ‘key’ piece of the collection, the other articles of clothing are there to compliment the ‘key’ piece. And she copied it from another designer!!! How ******* outrageous.

    And now her family got her another undeserved role in a movie?

    What the HELL is going on in Hollywood? Why no accountability?

  11. 111
    joie Says:

    Lexie, why don’t you get in touch with the original designers and ask them what they REALLY think. I’m sure they’ll be delighted with the news, especially since they’ve been lending RBils their clothes.

    BTW, it’s Sretsis, not Stretsis.

  12. 112
    stef Says:

    I was predicting she is no designer before I saw her line, I predict she will ruin the film. She is a nightmare.

  13. 113
    alyssA Says:

    who is the designer of the leather bag??

  14. 114
    real world Says:

    ATlqueen i can say what i like about her.Need to wash your mouth out soap.You don’t control nothing what people say here.Also i thought you didn;t like her kimberly. What change your mind? Both of you should make your mind about her.And stop telling people how to think. As i said relationship not and nobody has seen him.And who care about she’s doing and what clothes shecopy.

  15. 115
    scott-free Says:

    Anyone else tired of starlets pretending to be designers?! Thanks to them the real up and coming designers can’t sell their products. They have to go on Project Runway to be seen at all. Like all celebrity products, I never believe they are actually involved in everything.

    These bored & brainless starlets just hires genuine designer/s and would give 1% rough idea of what & how they want them to look like and these designer/s would execute 99% them. So presto! These moneyed tarts can now call themselves as “designers”!

    I’d say if you’re a “sensible consumer”, just go for the original one (Stretsis, Thailand) as its more cheaper and could add even a little help for the progression/promotion of that small clothing company and to their country as well being on 3rd rate country INSTEAD of digging to some US branded (on a high price) yet a “brazen phoney-baloney” apparels designs.

  16. 116
    lexie Says:

    Joie, I’m not the one who brought it up or the one making the accusations. It seems to bother others more than me so they can do the contacting. If you are going to accuse someone the burden of proof lies with you.

    Thanks for the correction on Sretsis.

  17. 117
    scott-free Says:

    Ooops “Typo-Errors” ahead…

    and these designer/s would execute 99% “OF” them.

    Stretsis – Sretsis

  18. 118
    ocsethummer Says:

    JJ just posted Edie Rose launch, jump to new thread everyone!

  19. 119
    Nicole Says:

    my parents were in line behind her during security at LAX!!!

  20. 120
    d Says:

  21. 121
    sex Says:

    Thank you, I have just been searching for information approximately this subject for ages and yours is the best I’ve came upon till now. But, what in regards to the conclusion? Are you positive concerning the source?|What i don’t realize is in truth how you’re not really a lot more smartly-liked than you may be right now. You are very intelligent.

  22. 122
    Canon Eos Camera Store And Reviews Says:

    Heya i’m for the primary time here. I came across this board and I to find It really helpful & it helped me out much. I’m hoping to provide one thing again and aid others such as you aided me.

  23. 123
    green real estate Says:

    It’s in point of fact a great and helpful piece of information. I am satisfied that you simply shared this useful information with us. Please keep us up to date like this. Thanks for sharing.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] Show All

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here