Top Stories

Christina Aguilera: Rockets Away!

Christina Aguilera: Rockets Away!
Like Just Jared on Facebook

JJ Links Around The Web

Wenn
  • Jenny McCarthy gives her thoughts on Rosie O'Donnell joining The View- US Weekly
  • Chris Brown and Drake are collaborating on a track together- TMZ
  • Cory Monteith's dad opens up on his death after one year- Gossip Cop
  • Luke Mitchell has signed on to star in Members Only- Just Jared Jr
  • Game of Thrones' Rose Leslie is joining Vin Diesel project- Entertainment Weekly
  • Orange is the New Black's Kate Mulgrew talks about her Emmy nomination- Huffington Post
  • When will Blake Lively go live with her new lifestyle website?- Lainey Gossip
  • Dawn of the Planet of the Apes director Matt Reeves talks about focusing the film on Caesar- The Hollywood Reporter
  • Mariel Booth shows off her bikini body- Hollywood Tuna

29 Comments

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All
# 1

HAHAHA!!!! OH ,SO NOW CHRISTINA UGLYERA IS COPYING “BARBARELLA” …..MAN! THAT B!TCH DOSEN’T HAVE AN ORIGINAL BONE IN HER BODY ……SHE IS A LOST CAUSE.

# 2

LOL!!! It took a small village and a special effects team to to make Christina look decent…..we all know homegirl does NOT look like that…it’s sad how ugly she is…
.
And yes PCO I agree about the Barbarella….Christina IS very UNoriginal……she’s boring and so is her new song.

# 3

she has a new song? who knew..

# 4
kirsty_lynch @ 10/21/2008 at 2:22 pm

PHOTOSHOPPED MUCH????

# 5

ENVY RULES !!!!

CHRISTINA IS PRETTY BUT THE PHOTOGRAPHER RETOUCHED THE BODY BECAUSE MMM… I REMEMBER THAT SHE HAD A BABY IN JANUARY

# 6

Christina looks like a thin version of Lady Bunny in those pics. She doesn’t even look like her usual cheap hooker clown self, that’s just straight up tranny.

# 7

Even all of the photoshop in the world can’t help Christina. I’m sorry.

# 8

There’s some fool on a foe website (supposedly) who has her screen name describing Christina’s eyes. Yeah, well that’s the only positive thing about her (& they are still enhanced w/contacts). Rest of her is BUTTAFACE!

# 9

you all have no idea, i strongly advise all you people who badly commented christina and her photos should not comment if they dont know wht there on about. because you all clearly dont.
christina aguilera is a huge inspiration to the fashion world shes always being used by designers for fashion shoots because shes beautiful, shes got the perfect complection even under he make up, “hence the reason why its easy to apply make up on her face”. her body is amazing especially when its in shape, we all know shes not in shape at the moment since shes had a baby shes admited shes been struggling to remove the weight but she is slowly and by her next studio album she should beback to her normal size with great skinny long legs. YES! theyve used photoshop on her body there but her face is 100% real its all lighting for her face ive seen her in photoshoots she usually never gets photoshop’d but since the baby she has been occasionally…. its clear to me your all britney fans and that your insulted by christina because you all know how beautiful she is compared to britney spears who has extremely spotty skin, and a huge forehead, her eyes are to far apart, her body is to broad for the camera and britney is always being photoshoped, thats why shes never an inspiration to the fashion industry and no fashion designers really want her to be in a photoshoot..

I strongly sugest all the people here to slag christina off should really think about what there saying and shouldnt comment on someone elses appearence if they have no idea about beauty and they should also look at there own image your all probably ugly anyway.

this whole unoriginal thing that christina apparently puts on? let me tell you something, if christina is unoriginal then how would you put these:

madonna ripping off abba’s intro for ‘Gimme Gimme Gimme’ in her single ‘Hung Up’

britney donning a 1920′s ‘Louise Brooks’ bob hair cut for her ‘Womanizer’ video, oh and look! a naked britters in the video too! soo original right? coz it hasnt been done before! oh and btw, that song is annoying, sounds like it was written by an illiterate teenager who suddenly ran out of words while attempting to creat a ‘comeback’ hit.

jessica simpson switching to country suddenly bcoz she saw how carrie underwood was more successful than her?

hmm, ashlee simpson doing the whole dance genre thing…why wont people accuse HER of doing a lady gaga? i mean she DOES sound like her

if that isnt copying and unoriginal then i dont know what is! god! narrow minded people like some of you just like to jump on the bandwagon and start hurling stupid comments left and right. the photo is obviously ‘inspired’ by barbarella and artists get inspiration from those kinds of things, otherwise you can call everyone in the industry copycats because thats what they do. why wont you call dita von teese a 1940s rip off?

oh and btw, everyone gets photoshopped nowadays. whatever you call it? britney is still fat compared to her pre-downfall body, and christna had just given birth. unless you know how to lose baby weight in less than a month without killing yourself, by all means do so yourself. besides, christina has left bubblegum pop a long time ago and you can tell bcoz she is now up there with the whitneys and mariahs. the grammys prove it, while our sad britters have yet to achieve one. if you dont like the new image christina has then fine, dont look and dont buy the album. your not practising your freedom of opinion, you’re just being stuck up, envious, sad, bitchy and pathetic.

kinda like the rejects you see in high school who start on people bcoz they cant do anything ti better their lives or to attract attention. so just ***** on the bleachers while christina wins another game bcoz you know what? she’s here to stay. she’s got the voice, the perfect family, great critical acclaim and a fantastic career. no wonder people just nitpick now. unlike britney who has nothing but the thought of stripping and singing on playback as a comeback, complete with synthesizers and a lawsuit or pathetic little drama every now and again

First off I am NOT a Britney fan ….Second the ONLY reason Christina got the Versace campaign ..was beacuse Britney turned it down!! look it up …..Christina is a no talent ugly tranny…she is a hasbeen ….The only time she looks ok is when she is AIRBRUSHED to an inch of her life in a photoshoot…when you see any “candid” picture of her she looks like a disgusting PIG……If you think she is “Beautiful” and sings well, I QUESTION your level of taste.

UGH!! SHE’S DONE BEING LADY GAGA NOW?? NOW SHE’S RIPPING OFF BARBARELLA….IT’S ONE THING TO BE INSPIRED BY SOME ONE OR A “LOOK” …BUT TO BLATANTLY STEAL SOMEONES IDENTITY AND PASS IT OFF AS YOUR OWN IS PATHETIC………..AND BRITNEY,,MADONNA,,,BEYONCE,,,, & JESSICA HAVE NEVER DONE THAT…..CHRISTINA DOES IT ALLLLL THE TIME SINCE DAY ONE…

.
.
WHO SAID ANYTHING ABOUT BRITNEY????……CHRISTINA FANS ARE CRAZY PSYCHO HATERS!!!!…….NO MATTER WHAT IS SAID THEY AUTOMATICLY ATTACK BRITNEY SPEARS…..WHY IS IT SOOO HARD TO UNDERSTAND PEOPLE MAY NOT LIKE CHRISTINA ALL ON THEIR OWN????….I DON’T LIKE EITHER OF THEM…..BUT CHRISTINA IS WAY MORE ANNOYING.
.
.

Envy??…uh hell no! ..Iwould be pissed off if I looked like Christina Uglyera…and her voice is gawd awful.

it’s you bitchney fan that always come up on christina aguilera news feed… so come on go back to your insipid bitchney…

people are so rude with christina, if you do have no interest in her, why come up here ?? do get out…

christina doesnt take her look too seriously like some others dumbasses, she feels comfortable in her own skin and we know where it lead her, ( at least not to the desasters that knew bitchney spearz …)

we do recognize aguilera’s talent, sorry for those who dont…

i am so loving this new image. i was so over the glam look she had a day after she debuted it. as for the tranny talk, it’s a compliment. the world’s biggest female icons have always been called trannies. Cher, Barbara, and the list goes on. i heart you Christina :)

.
WHITE TRASH NO TALENT HASBEEN
.
WHITE TRASH NO TALENT HASBEEN
.
WHITE TRASH NO TALENT HASBEEN
.
WHITE TRASH NO TALENT HASBEEN
.
WHITE TRASH NO TALENT HASBEEN
.
WHITE TRASH NO TALENT HASBEEN
.
WHITE TRASH NO TALENT HASBEEN
.

WHO SAID ANYTHING ABOUT BRITNEY????……CHRISTINA FANS ARE CRAZY PSYCHO HATERS!!!!…….NO MATTER WHAT IS SAID THEY AUTOMATICLY ATTACK BRITNEY SPEARS…..WHY IS IT SOOO HARD TO UNDERSTAND PEOPLE MAY NOT LIKE CHRISTINA ALL ON THEIR OWN????….I DON’T LIKE EITHER OF THEM…..BUT CHRISTINA IS WAY MORE ANNOYING.
.
Well said…….
.
P.S
this is not a Christina “Fan” site, if you want all rosie talk about this ManLady then go back to your Fan Site and STAY there.

You Christina fans sure have an answer for EVERYTHING….must suck to have to defend your “Friend” all the time. lol

BARBARELLA huh?
-So WHO did she steal THIS from??
-the fact they are making a re-make of the movie (with rose mcgowen)
-the Jane Fonda version
-Or the fact that Britney Spears already did this years ago with her “oops” video??
.
Christina is a straight bitter!!!
.
get your own thing girl.
.

I’d like inform you that Scarlett Johansson (actress)actually is a clone from original person,who has nothing with acting career.Clone was created illegally using stolen biomaterial.Original Scarlett Galabekian last name is nice, CHRISTIAN young lady.I’ll tell more,those clones(it’s not only 1)made in GERMANY-world leader manufacturer of humans clones,it’s in Ludwigshafen am Rhein,N. Bavaria,Mr.Helmut Kohl home town.You can’t even imaging the scale of the cloning activity.But warning,H.Kohl staff 100% controlling their clones spreading around the world,they’re NAZI type disciplined and mind controlled,be careful get close with clones you will be controlled too.Original family didn’t authorize any activity with stolen biomaterials,no matter what form it was created in,it’s all need to be back to original family control in Cedars-Sinai MedicalCenter in LA.Controlling clones is US military operation.Original Scarlett never was engaged,by the way

johohohoh @ 10/22/2008 at 1:46 am

czarace @ 10/21/2008 at 5:43 pm
britney donning a 1920’s ‘Louise Brooks’ bob hair cut for her ‘Womanizer’ video, oh and look! a naked britters in the video too! soo original right? coz it hasnt been done before! oh and btw, that song is annoying, sounds like it was written by an illiterate teenager who suddenly ran out of words while attempting to creat a ‘comeback’ hit.

>>>and i hate you for telling this..
you XTINA fans should GET A LIFE!!

2 Xtina’s haters,
us fans r not the only ones who should get lives. we spend just as much time on these particular sites as u do so lets cut th@ sh*t.

JAKJAK:
TH@T’S ALL U COULD THINK OF 2 SAY? SORRY, BUT WE ONLY TOLERATE PEOPLE WHO CAN ACTUALLY STRING MORE THAN 1 SENTENCE 2GETHER, SO TAKE A HIKE.

WHATEVA:
US FANS FEEL (AS FANS) THAT IT IS OUR DUTY 2 PROTECT XTINA FROM HURTFUL COMMENTS. WE ALSO HURT 4 XTINA WHEN THINGS LIKE ‘TRANNY’ AND ‘HASBEEN’ R THROWN 4 THE SIMPLE FACT: TH@ WE KNOW SHE ISN’T ANY OF THOSE THINGS. NO ONE IS ANY OF THOSE THINGS.

GINGER:
U R SPOT ON. I AM A FAN OF BOTH BRIT AND XTINA FOR I LUV TH@ EACH HAS HER OWN STYLE, WHETHER IT B FASHION OR MUSIC. EACH IS AN INDIVIDUAL IN HER OWN WAY. ‘PSYCHO HATERS’ LOL, TH@T’S CUTE.

QbOY:
THANX 4 THE COMMENT AND TH@ IS TRULY THE AGE-OLD QUESTION.

HELLNO:
WAT U R MISTAKING 4 A ‘GAWD-AWFUL’ VOICE IS ACTUALLY THE SOUND OF A REAL SINGING VOICE. SOUNDS PRETTY AWSOME WHEN U THINK OF IT TH@ WAY DOESN’T IT? SOME OF 2DAYS CELEBS R SO HEAVILY OVER-PRODUCED WITHOUT OUR KNOWLEDGE TH@ WHEN A REAL THING COMES ALONG, WE CAN’T HANDLE IT OR NOTICE IT 4 WAT IT IS. RAW TALENT.

GABE, GAGA AND PCO:
U MAY B RITE IN SOME CASES, ACTUALLY, BUT IT’S THOSE THINGS ABOUT XTINA TH@ US FANS ADORE. SHE BRINGS HOME THE CLASSICS SO WE NEVA FORGET THEM. MOST CELEBS LOOK 2 THE FUTURE AND LOOK 2 FIND A NEW SOUND THEY CAN PLUG, BUT XTINA, INSTEAD OF GOING THE WAY OF ARTISTS SUCH AS THE ADORABLE BRITNEY OR THE ABSOLUTELY AMAZING RIHANNA, SHE REMINDS OF HOW MUSIC USED 2 B, LIKE WITH HER ALBUM ‘BACK TO BASICS’, WHERE SHE BROUGHT BACK CLASSIC SOUNDS SUCH AS THE BLUES OF LEGEND ‘ETTA JAMES’, THE SOUL OF ‘NAT KING COLE’ AND THE JAZZ OF ‘STEVIE WONDER’. SHE DRAWS FROM INSPIRATION, WHICH SOME REFER 2 AS ‘COPYING’. AN EASY MISTAKE AND MISUNDERSTANDING. SHE FOUND HER OWN FEET WITH HER ALBUM ‘STRIPPED’ WHERE SHE COULD NOT HAVE BEEN MORE OF AN INDIVIDUAL. HER FIRST ALBUM WHICH WAS SELF-TITLED, WAS XTINA TRAPPED IN A SOUND TH@ WAS NOT HER AND SHE KNEW IT SO SHE DID SOMETHING ABOUT IT. UNDERSTANDABLE. ALSO IF U R LOOKING 4 OTHER WAYS OF INDIVIDUALITY, LISTEN 2 HER LYRICS. THEY R SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT THAN MOST FEMALE ARTISTS. BUT ALL ARTISTS HAVE THEIR SOUND. XTINA SIMPLY REMINDS OF THE DAYS WHEN MUSIC WAS REAL, WHICH IS A SOUND TH@ SHOULD STICK AROUND 4 AS LONG AS IT SHOULD. KNOW SHE IS BREAKING OUT WITH A BIT OF ‘WARHOL, POP ART’ WHICH SHOULD B FUN. THANX 4 UR POSTS AND NICE TALKING 2 U.

CZARACE AND XISME:
U GUYS JUST GET IT. THANK U SO MUCH.

SICKITTEN:
LIKE GABE AND GAGA, U MAY B RITE, BUT SHE MAKES HERSELF UNATTRACTIVE, IT DOES NOT NESSESARILY MEAN SHE IS UNATTRACTIVE UNDERNEATH THE MAKE-UP SHE WEARS. WE SOMETIMES GET SWEPT UP WITH HOLLYWOODS PERSPECTIVE OF THE ‘PERFECT’ WOMAN. WE JUST NEED 2 REMIND OURSELVES TH@ SHE IS A PERSON OF TALENT AND INNER BEAUTY AND IS AN ICON FOR YOUNG PEOPLE EVERYWHERE. THANX.

REMEMBER EVERY1: A HUNDRED HURTFUL COMMENTS CAN LEAVE TEARS BUT ONE NICE 1 LEAVES A SMILE.

LUV U XTINA!!!!

VIVA XTINA!!!

BREEZY B !

Thxs

At last some one that get the whole situation.
Seems like some people will never understand that there is no need to be hatry !

Up’ for Xtina

i love brazil @ 10/22/2008 at 8:56 am

she wished she looked like that…LOL

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here