OlderKate Winslet: No More Nudity!
Kate Winslet, who is nominated for her sixth Academy Award for her performance in The Reader, has been named Best Actress in the the new issue of Time, on newsstands tomorrow.
On baring it all in The Reader, the 33-year-old British beauty says, “I think I won’t [get naked in a movie] again. I can’t keep getting away with it, and I don’t want to become ‘that actress who always gets her kit off.”
While looking over her old diaries, Kate adds, “I was struck to discover that I was truly the same person back then. But in the diary, I write several times, ‘I’m not sure I should really be working. I’ve got to learn more. I have to catch up with myself.’ Well, I feel I’ve caught up with myself now. With these roles, I’ve just closed a big chapter in my life. I feel that only in the last two years could I look someone in the eye and say, ‘I know how to act’ and really maybe mean it. (pauses) Notice I said maybe.”
Check out the full Kate feature at Time.com.
62 Comments
Naked or not, she’s always classy. Go Kate!:)
I disagree with this choice. But she looks pretty.
I love her so much. She’s incredible.
Kate rules. She is miles above most of the other so-called “actresses” in Hollywood.
Nice cover. I can’t seem to get over how gorgeous this woman is these days.. she has the beauty that every women can look up/relate to, truly a women’s woman! Go Kate!
She looks gorgeous on that cover! Natural beauty, love herrrr!
I totally loooooove her! but this is a really bad cover :S
shes so pretty and classy, shes a great actress
I think that acting is about being honest and if showing skin enhances the story it can be done to great effect. Maybe because she is British, but in most of her movies, the nudity enhances the sensuality of her characters. As long as it is not gratuitous then being naked is just part of the art of film.
not a lot of people can pull that off with that little makeup
No she is not ‘NOMINATED FOR HER SIXTH ACADEMY AWARD”. THAT would mean she already has five Oscars. Please get it right. This is her sixth nomination.
wow.. hardly ANY makeup.. no photoshop.like nobody can pull that off. Her face is classic and beautful, shes so talented.. but I loved her real boobies.. would be sad not to see them anymore.. youre still an extremely beautiful, classy woman.. nudity is art. especially coming from her. I adore Kate Winslet.
If they give the award to Winslet instead of the brilliant performance by Meryl Streep then there is no justice.
Team Lara Croft thinks Angelina Jolie should get it obviously. love Kate and she’s not overrated! She barely does magazine covers so maybe she just wanted to have fun. I think both her and Meryl are the top 2 to get the Oscar. But I LOVED Kate in The Reader. She was mesmerizing (sp?) and just great!
She’s a wonderful actress, and is stunning… However, the idea that she is wearing hardly any make-up or photo shop is silly.
Yes. she is beautiful, and yes she has make-up on & of course that is photo shopped!
She looks great, but I’m sure even Kate would agree that the “natural” look on this cover is part of an illusion.
She is a natural beauty. Not too many people can pull off no makeup and look stunning but she can.
# 15
Amen to everything you said Jessalyn.
She’s absolutely beautiful, both inside & out. Good luck Kate & God bless .
i honestly love her as an actor and a person
but when she talks, omg is she so ******* boring
i swear i can predict the **** she will say
she always seems to say “omg im fat” or “i think im a horrible actress”
u need 2 stop it kate plz =[
Yes, IMO, Angelina should get it. But Angie already has an Oscar anyway so she could not care less. But Angie’s performance was the most brilliant one – as always.
Kate looks just beautiful on the cover and she was awsome in The Reader
Yes, IMO, Angelina should get it. But Angie already has an Oscar anyway so she could not care less. But Angie’s performance was the most brilliant one – as always.
***********************************************
I hardly think that an actor “could care less” if he/she wins, just because he/she already has an Oscar. Plus, that was for best supporting, not for lead. And sorry, but A Jolie is not in the same ball park as K Winslet. No way.
Oh dee
^^^^^^^^
Who are you, James Lipton? Stella Adler? Kate is fine but I think they are certainly in the same league. Did you see Angie as Marianne Pearl? Hello. Kate is very talented but Angelina is certainly her peer. Angelina has made it clear – so has Brad – that what matters is the family first. They really do not care as much as they used to about awards and fame – it is just an outlet that lets them do their charity work. I know you want to start something but fight with your self. It is no coincidence that Angelina gets more roles, more work and is more famous than Kate – Angelina is more than her peer – she is whom Kate would love to be as any actress would want that ability to be offered any role you want.
Angie was good in Changeling but she’s wasn’t the best. And the only reason she’s more famous than Kate is because she’s in the headlines pimping her kids out. All in all, Angie is okay but does not compare to Kate’s acting ability. sure Angie has won an Oscar, but she’s only been nominated 2 times. kate has been nominated 6 times and i know lots of people rooting for her or Meryl Streep.
wow she looks amazing! she is just naturally beautiful and a talented actress.
Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All