Top Stories

Jake Gyllenhaal & Stephen Gaghan: Caffe Luxxe Lunch

Jake Gyllenhaal & Stephen Gaghan: Caffe Luxxe Lunch

A Reese Witherspoon-less Jake Gyllenhaal grabs lunch at Caffe Luxxe on Friday afternoon (April 24) in Santa Monica, Calif.

The 28-year-old actor was accompanied by fellow Nike-sneakers-wearing Stephen Gaghan, an Academy Award and Emmy Award-winning film writer and director. You think the pair have a film project in the works together?

Earlier this week, Jake was seen cuddling with girlfriend Reese Witherspoon at the Coachella Musical Festival.

10+ pictures inside of Jake Gyllenhaal and Stephen Gaghan‘s Caffe Luxxe lunch…

Like Just Jared on Facebook
jake gyllenhaal stephen gaghan cafe luxxe 01
jake gyllenhaal stephen gaghan cafe luxxe 02
jake gyllenhaal stephen gaghan cafe luxxe 03
jake gyllenhaal stephen gaghan cafe luxxe 04
jake gyllenhaal stephen gaghan cafe luxxe 05
jake gyllenhaal stephen gaghan cafe luxxe 06
jake gyllenhaal stephen gaghan cafe luxxe 07
jake gyllenhaal stephen gaghan cafe luxxe 08
jake gyllenhaal stephen gaghan cafe luxxe 09
jake gyllenhaal stephen gaghan cafe luxxe 10

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Snooki steps out after giving birth to her second baby- US Weekly
  • Taylor Swift is getting sued by a chauffeur service- TMZ
  • NFL player Husain Abdullah was penalized for a Muslim prayer on the field - Gossip Cop
  • Watch Bethany Mota and Derek Hough get a perfect score on Dancing with the Stars- Just Jared Jr
  • Netflix has added some new films to their collection- Entertainment Weekly
  • Bill Murray talks about being a caddy before his role in Caddyshack- Huffington Post
  • Read a recap for the latest episode of Masters of Sex- Lainey Gossip
  • How much did CNN pay for George Zimmerman's hotel tab before an interview?- The Hollywood Reporter
  • Bryana Holly knows how to heat up the desert- Hollywood Tuna


Pages: « 1 [2] 3 » Show All

I love you #24.

molto grazie! che regalo delizioso!

wHortensia @ 04/26/2009 at 2:04 pm

I know Spanish and Portuguese but not Italian, but I could still understand some of it. I don’t know minchia, que stronzo, or testa di cazzo. Could you put those into, say, Spanish for me? I’d like to add them to my vocabulary. I think they would be useful. BTW Portuguese says filho de puta which is very like the Italian.

wHortensia @ 04/26/2009 at 2:07 pm

I looked up cazzo and I presume testa di cazzo is something you suck on, right? Yum, yum. LOL

......... @ 04/26/2009 at 2:30 pm

please,wHortensia, don’t take any offence on this, it’s not directed to you, it’s addressed to number 17,19 and 20, who are the same person, by the way.

......... @ 04/26/2009 at 2:36 pm

..testa di cazzo means ‘d*ickhead’ or a*sshole, but let’s our friend translate by himself/herself, as he/she is sooooo SMART. He/she should know what the whole thing means.

Jared's sister @ 04/26/2009 at 2:58 pm

What a testy little Jake “fan” we have here. Not unusual, most are. Nice to know their immaturity and inability to deal with people crosses all cultures and nationalities.

#32, vete a la mierda tia, por lo menos ten la decencia de escribir con el mismo nombre, y respeta los comentarios de la gente, no importa del pais que vengan,… racista! Como eres tan culta seguro que tambien sabes traducir esto,no?Seguro que no has salido de tu pais en tu puta vida,necesitas viajar y abrir la mente un poco mas. Jodete!

Jared’s sister, jealous Jake has got fans all over the world? Well, yes, he has, he’s got lots of fans in Europe and here we don’t debate his sexuality, we just like his movies and admire him for his work. Donnie Darko and BBM are my favs.

32, god, you must be a really big fan of Jake if you are coming to this post so many times using different names, I bet you are pis*sed off that La Witherspoon got him,……. I bet that’s what gets you!

wHortensia @ 04/26/2009 at 4:17 pm

I didn’t think it was directed to me. I just wanted to contribute my little bit to the discussion. LOL

wHortensia @ 04/26/2009 at 8:14 pm

Natalie: Jake is best when he plays a nice American kid as in October Sky or Good Girl (a bit disturbed there, but nice and sweet) and even in Brokeback where he was in the beginning a teen ager. He is NOT so good when tries playing a grown up who has lost the charm of his youth. That’s why, I think, Rendition and Zodiac and some others don’t show him at his best. How he will do in Prince of Persia is yet to be seen. He also should be coming out in Brothers and Nailed, but those movies seem stalled for some reason. He is too upset by paps, however, and his not nice side comes out when they annoy him. He doesn’t accept the fact that he has to put up with them. He also hides away; few know exactly where he lives, unlike the case with most actors.

Jared's sister @ 04/26/2009 at 9:10 pm

I think Jake Gyllenhaal is really ugly and a terrible actor. I could care less who “got” him. You’re moronic under many names and in two languages. At least I use the same name when I post.

wHortensia @ 04/26/2009 at 11:03 pm

If Jake were “really ugly” and a “terrible actor” his career in Hollyweird would have been dead long ago. He is NOT a great actor, like Ledger, and he is not beautiful like Pitt used to be, but he is attractive to many and his thousands of fans testify to that.

A lot of people, like me, think that Jake is more handsome than Pitt (even Pitt in the past) and, at least, as good actor as Heath was.
The truth depends on point of view.

38, people can use as many names as they want to express their views, just the same as you do. If you don’t care at all about Jake, what are you doing posting here and looking at his pics?Just skip the post and go to another one.Also, people from all over the world can access this web and they are free to write in their own language if they want.

wHortensia @ 04/27/2009 at 3:26 am

The best place to compare Ledger and Gyllenhaal is in BBM where they acted together. There you can see that Ledger was a great great actor while Jake was good to excellent but not great. And the common perception was reflected in that Ledger was nominated for best actor and Jake for best SUPPORTING actor.

wHortensia @ 04/27/2009 at 3:29 am

Ledger’s superiority to Jake in BBM was also reflected in the author’s statements about them. She said Ledger was so good he understood his character better than she, the author, did. She made some nice noises about Jake but it was clear she didn’t think he was up to Ledger’s level at all.


the opinion that Ledger was superior to Jake is just that, AN OPINION. Why make it a contest between the two of them, anyway? They were both great. Better than great, there’s no word to describe how excellent they BOTH were in BBM.

Your explanation about why Jake got Best Supporting Actor Nomination is erroneous. Jake rec’d Best Supporting Actor nom because obviously the filmmakers won’t pit two great actors in the same film against each other for Best Actor. That would be, how you say? stoooopid.

wHortensia @ 04/27/2009 at 6:22 pm

No they both were NOT great; Ledger was better than Jake; that is not just MY opinion; it was the consensus opinion. Further, the most qualified person to judge was Annie Proulx who wrote the story. She praised Ledger far above Jake. The reason Jake was nominated for an inferior award was because he was manifestly inferior to Heath; virtually everybody in the business said so.

wHortensia @ 04/27/2009 at 6:27 pm

People get confused about Jake and Heath mainly because Jake is/was better looking than Heath. But good looks are not the same as great acting. In fact Jake did not fit the role of Jack Twist very well, as Proulx said. Jack in the story was bucktoothed and not handsome; thus Jake was not a true representation of Jack in the story. He was used because he was good looking, and a good, not great, actor. Many critics were angry when Heath didn’t get the Oscar that they thought he deserved. I didn’t see any critic complaining that Jake was cheated of the Oscar he deserved.

Jake won BAFTA, Ledger didn´t.
Philip S.Hoffman won Oscar in 2006 and he was better than Ledger.
George Clooney – who I love too – won Oscar and Jake didn´t cause he´s too young because, IN MY OPINION, in fact, he was the best 2006.
Like me, English thought the same way.

wHortensia @ 04/29/2009 at 5:37 pm

here’s some useful info. according to Forbes, in the last year, the following celebs earned the following amounts:
J. Aniston 27 million
R. Witherspoon 25 million
D. Radcliffe 25 million
B. Pitt 20 million
T. Cruise 13 million
N. Kidman 13 million.

So Aniston earned more than Pitt and Cruise and Kidman the same mount. Witherspoon tied with Dan Radcliffe and poor poor Jakeypoo wasn’t even on the list. He didn’t even make the bottom aroun 1.5 million. Poor Jakeypoo.

wHortensia @ 04/29/2009 at 5:40 pm

I think we need to start a fund to collect charity for Jakeypoo. He needs money according to Forbes. No wonder he is sucking up to Witherspoon. She’s got the dough.

wHortensia @ 04/29/2009 at 10:24 pm

Hoffmann won, not because he was better than Ledger, he wasn’t, but because the Academy was nervous about BBM and an outsider taking the Oscar. Most eminent critics thought Ledger should have won. Further, Hoffmann’s job was easy since he had only to imitate Capote of whom many films existed, while Ledger had to build a character from just the words of the story. No comparison. Hoffmann’s job was just mimicry.

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 » Show All

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here