Top Stories

Cynthia Nixon: Wedding In The Works

Cynthia Nixon: Wedding In The Works

Sex and the City star Cynthia Nixon is set to marry girlfriend of six years, education activist Christine Marinoni.

The 43-year-old actress tells Extra, “My girlfriend and I got engaged last month. We’re hoping to do it in New York. We’re not going to wait forever, but we’re hoping it’s just around the corner…Sometime I think before the end of next summer, but we don’t have a date.”

Cynthia has an engagement ring but also reveals her fiancee chose not to have one: “[Christine] did not get a ring. She will have a wedding ring but she does not want an engagement ring.”

The sequel to the movie Sex and the City will “start shooting sometime in August.”

Like Just Jared on Facebook
Photos: WENN
Posted to: Christine Marinoni, Cynthia Nixon

JJ Links Around The Web

Getty

97 Responses to “Cynthia Nixon: Wedding In The Works”

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 » Show All

  1. 1
    kay21 Says:

    ah congrats to them, they make a really nice couple

  2. 2
    alexis Says:

    i agree w/ #1 i’m glad gay marriage is becoming more excepted. congrats!

  3. 3
    gigi Says:

    Give me a break. This is so wrong.

  4. 4
    cutie Says:

    congratulations! :-)

  5. 5
    anonymous Says:

    Congratulations!!

  6. 6
    Charlie Johnson Says:

    I just threw up at looking at this ugly couple!

  7. 7
    just saying Says:

    These are two lesbians, they aren’t “engaged” they can’t “get married” and they can’t have children together.

    They are two women living together.

  8. 8
    Roxanne Says:

    To each his/her own, but the wife/husband is extra ugly.

  9. 9
    lakers fan in boston Says:

    and the award for the uglies lesbians goes 2………….
    THESE 2 *******!!
    honestly, i still cant comprehend how ugly they r
    and i thought it was bad here in boston seeing some semi ugly lesbians

  10. 10
    just saying Says:

    I’m engaged to my dog, I’m gonna marry my dog and me and my dog are gonna have children. No we are not, and neither are they!

  11. 11
    laura Says:

    Of course, there is something that has to be changed to accommodate this lifestyle. No matter how you slice and dice it, one of these women will have to take the feminine and male role–because that is how God intended it. A man and a woman. No other combination will work–two men and one woman or three women or whatever.

  12. 12
    jess Says:

    ew!

  13. 13
    Kirsty Says:

    Congrats (:
    I’m sure they’re happy!

  14. 14
    AMYbobammy Says:

    wow, this story always freaks me out.
    They are gross.
    omg
    What is the attraction. If I were a lesbian I would find a hot chick, not this.
    WTF?

  15. 15
    ellemac Says:

    Congrats to C&C!!!

    What does an education activist do?

  16. 16
    Anon Says:

    Cynthia’s “wife” is SO ugly!! She may be a nice person, but there are other nice people out there who actually look good!

  17. 17
    just saying Says:

    @ellemac:

    educates our children that being a perverted freak is normal

  18. 18
    AMY Says:

    Congrats to them!

    But gosh, her partner is not cute :P

  19. 19
    marriage = man + woman Says:

    is cynthia marrying danny bonaduce?

  20. 20
    daisy Says:

    Hey – so many narrow-minded people on this post so I thought I’d even the playing field………brace yourself :P

    Whilst I agree that biologically, the concurrence of two females in such a relationship is incompatible, it doesn’t mean that it isn’t normal. People on this post have a really archaic view on the whole situation. What is normal? What is right? In the past, it was deemed as ridiculous for women to have any sort of independence – women have the biological capability of having children but should that be their one and only purpose in life? Such potentialities are just that. They are not absolutes that must be inevitably fulfilled. Furthermore, on the contrary to popular opinion, a lot of the time women enter into same sex relationships because they actually feel a greater compatibility with their partners, than with men and I think it is completely understandable. As women, our natures and frames of mind are inherently similar and hence, the companionship that might develop between two women should actually be more common than that between a man and a woman (and vice versa with men). If anything, the relationship between a man and woman is fundamentally more shallow and base because it is largely cultivated by a sexual attraction. I don’t know how applicable this is to all same sex relationships but I have heard it been said that sometimes people don’t consider gender as an issue and that their attraction to the other person is based purely on their character. Obviously, there are people out there who have a specific sexual preference for their gender – I can’t explain that but it doesn’t mean it’s not normal. The ‘norm’ is dictated by general opinion but this doesn’t mean that it is right one. What is so harmful about same-sex relationships to society – the population today is expanding at a rate at which it is actually beneficial for there to be same sex relationships. So people who argue that God made man to be with woman, well maybe God’s provided the potential to be gay as society’s survival mechanism.

  21. 21
    omg Says:

    A baboons ass is better looking than these two “people”

  22. 22
    cutiepie32 Says:

    What kind of woman doesnt want an engagement ring? Oops, I know, a manly one!

  23. 23
    just saying Says:

    @daisy:

    it was once “norm” to have slaves and still is in parts of Africa and Middle East, wanna continue on with your sociology lesson.

  24. 24
    Nozycat Says:

    Who is the 14 year old boy with Cynthia ? Free Ray ban Sunglasses when you google nozycat

  25. 25
    ellemac Says:

    @just saying:

    You mean she’s fighting homophobia in schools! Very admirable work and more power to her.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 » Show All

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here