Top Stories

Debbie Rowe "Never" Wanted To Be A Mother

Debbie Rowe
Just Jared on Facebook
Photos: Aaron Lambert-Pool/Getty
Posted to: Debbie Rowe, Newsies

JJ Links Around The Web

Getty
  • Justin Bieber ditches his shirt at the gym - TMZ
  • Elton John is NOT retiring - Gossip Cop
  • Yara Shahidi started a fun new project - Just Jared Jr
  • Selena Gomez wears pajamas and heels while shopping- Radar
  • Milo Ventimiglia opens up about working with Will Smith - Lainey Gossip
  • Moana hits big at the box offices for the second weekend - The Hollywood Reporter
  • a

    what a b*tch!!! your soo last year!!

  • Nik

    rowe makes me sick

  • Jen

    I cannot stand Rowe.

    and I have to say Monica Cruz is much prettier than Penelope Cruz

  • Milie

    Why does she keep talking like that, her children are old now, they understand, and she’s just increasing their pain !!!

  • Shawna

    That article about Debbie Rowe is so stupid. How are they actually allowed to print stuff as if it is fact saying Dad is Arnold Klein. They do NOT know that! And he isn’t. What a load of bullshit!

  • http://justjared dear god

    Well she is some “mother” isn’t she ?
    I hope these shuts up a lot of idiots that talk in her favor without knowing the FACTS .

  • T

    I guess that means she doesn’t want the kids?

  • *******

    Debbie Rowe is being honest and the only thing I can say is that she shouldn’t fight for these children if she never wanted to be a mother. The media is bringing to many people into the matter. Like when they were trying to identify who the sperm doner was. Why would you find the doner who wanted to remain annonymous to begin with? So that the kids have another stranger coming into their lives making more havic? It’s sad but these children should have a say in who they feel they would be more comfortable living with. I hope all the best for these children.

  • argh

    is it only me that notice… this woman looks like an alien

  • a total fan

    I think Rowe twelve years ago was not ready to be a mom, but she did want Jackson to be a father, so she had the children for him. But now at fifty she is older and hopefully more mature and maybe feeling the loss of never really being a mom or having been a hands on mom and sees her life and chance to do so pass her by. IMO she should leave the children where they are with the only family they have ever known, the Jacksons. Although I do feel that the children should be given a chance to know their mother ( but that should be at the children insistance) she is after all the only parent they have left, . We don’t know what they have been told about their mother , they might not even know that she is alive. But we do have to remember that this interview was done in 2003 and people do change through the years. But I still think the children should stay where they are and she should not push herself into their lives.

  • http://justjared @8

    Michael Jackson was the father of the children it doesn’t matter if biologically or not he was the father Paris spoke loud and clearly about who was her father and what kind of father he was.
    If Michael indeed used a sperm doner to have children I think with the kind of money he had his lawyers arranged everything to prevent the donator from having every claim on his children or money the obsession of the media about all of this is just because they need to feel their pages with nonsense so idiotic people who eat this shit up will buy them they need scandals if the donator if there was one was found it would be a really big news because the public doesn’t know if Michael Jackson was the father of the children biologically.
    Personally I think Michael was the father of the children BIOLOGICALLY when he was alive and the children were in hiding and we casually saw them I thought only Blanket the little one was his biologically because to me he looks just like Michael when he was younger .
    Seeing all of the three children on TV at his memorial I don’t care what people think NO WAY IN HELL PRINCE AND PARIS ARE PRODUCTS OF TWO WHITE PEOPLE I think Micheal and Debbie are their parents Paris seems a prettier version of Debbie and I don’t know seeing her with Janet they looked so alike I stand by my believe that at least Blanket is Michel Jackson’s son BIOLOGICALLY.
    I am not sure about the other two but as I said seeing them made me think they look a lot like the Jackson’s they all looked family Prince and Paris didn’t look like they weren’t related biologically to the Jackson’s .

  • tathiane

    It makes no difference, really.

  • lALA

    GOOD FOR HER NOW LEAVE THE CHILDREN THE HELL ALONE AND LET THEM LIVE THEIR LIVES. THEY HAVE ALREADY SUFFERED ENOUGH LOSS.

  • http://cutiepie@yahoo.com cutie pie

    Debbie Rowe os one old wrinkled looking hag, she was a womb renter and a gold digger she is not even worth the time of day.. HO sit down!! And for the fact of comparing the little girl Paris, looks just like that DR Arnold Kein with the same big ears and everything! They aint fooling me but if MJ wanted it he had the money to pay for some white kids, more power to him, ill keep my own kids and if they give them to Debbie (hand up a horse’s butt Rowe) they will definetly be messed up!!

  • jenny

    why don’t she just go away? she wants more money and attention as always, they need to pretend they are going to give her those kids and watch her run like hell, since Michael was not the bio dad, if the Jackson’s wanted to be mean, they could contest the will like Debbie is trying to do and those kids wouldn’t see a dime. if debbi get the kids she should have to give the money back.

  • http://justjared @ haters

    Wow Michael Jackson’s haters are ignorant lolololol.
    Debbie gold digger Rowe doesn’t stand a chance in a court if she ever enters one because :

    1.She sold the right to the kids to Michael over an over again a judge will take that in consideration .

    2.She still has to prove that she is their biological mother her word is not good enough she will have to prove it and she will have to prove that Michael Jackson is not their biological father .

    3.There are THREE kids not two no judge will split them just because the bitch want him to they grew as brothers a judge will take that in consideration .

    4.The kids are OLD ENOUGH TO VOICE THEIR OPINION I DOUBT THEY WOULD WANT TO LEAVE THE ONLY FAMILY THEY KNOW NOT TO MENTION THEIR LITTLE BROTHER TO GO LIVING WITH A STRANGER.

    5.The interviews like the one above with be looked by the judge and she herself said SHE IS NO MOTHER .

    6.Michael Jackson was the only LEGAL PARENT not to mention he raised them ALL BY HIMSELF AND HE MADE IT CLEAR WHO HE WANTED TO TAKE CARE OF HIS CHILDREN IN HIS WILL a judge no matter what people say will take that in consideration .

    I think the Jacksons will have to pay her out of the children’s life as usual that is why she is doing all of this and she will probably achieve it which pisses me off since she shouldn’t take more money from Michael she got enough already .

  • nat

    She’s right giving birth does not mean your a mother.

  • kimmie

    from what i understand (under california law) if children are born during a legal marriage and the paternity not questioned within 2 years the partners of that marriage are the legal parents.

    i think they should be left alone and the wishes of the father represented in the will should be honored. i thinkl they will protected and loved by the jackson family far more then by anyone else.

  • Mother Hubard

    Rowe’s words can hurt her on Monday,July 13.I HOPE she gets custody for her 2 and the last 1 too.
    COMMON SENSE,none of the kids are hers biologically.They,the 2 older ones ,are hers legally. She had her parental right restored during MJ’s trial.
    These kids needs an unbiased and normal upbringing now and out of Lotoya and Debbie,Rowe is best.The grandmother is too old even with a house full of servants. Latoya crazy Jack$on would be the mommy.
    LOOK ,D ROWE and MJ had a deal.A CONTRACT.Rowe lived up to her endof teh bsuinessdeal.
    LOOK UPhow much she got paid,8.5 million.

    Look up THE JACK$SON FAMILY MEMBERS-banckrupcty,Randy and Jermaine each married the same wh*ore, Joe Jackson’s child from 1974 and his affairs,CrazyLatoya,and these people need MONEY$$$$$$$$$$$$$.

  • VICTORIA # 1

    I have lost all respect for Debbie Rowe since her 2003 interview. After watching that, I thought she was a level headed lady who really loved Michael and the children. But now, she is just like any other gold-digging whore after more of Michal’s money. Dosen’t she know that any more money she get’s will affect her children’s future?
    She STILL isn’t prepared at HER age to become a mother to children she has not seen or met in years. Plus, does she have the heart to split up those children ? Haven’t they suffered enough, for God’s sake ? The only reason she is doing this, is because she knows the Jackson family will buy her off. Deep down she does NOT want the children, and she knows it.
    There must be a stable member of the Jackson family who can raise these children. Even Diana Ross is a better choice, over Debbie Rowe. I hope the presiding Judge reads ” JARED “, because he needs to go back to her ( Debbie’s ) 2003 interview and listen carefully. This is one time that the children of Michael Jackson need to really have a voice in the matter and be heard.
    Another sad part of their father’s legacy is that his personal things are going to be auctioned off. I believe those things ( or some of them ) should be saved for the children. They are what made their father. The kids need to have first pick. What a shame! Michael’s family needs to step in and try to control that, if they can, for his children’s sake. Later on, they will be heart-broken, knowing their father’s work is among strangers. This whole ordeal is a nightmare.
    JARED, YOU NEED TO SEE WHAT YOU CAN DO. START A CAMPAIGN TO STOP THE SALE, FOR HIS CHILDREN’S SAKE!!!!

  • http://dlisted.com lakers fan in boston

    i god another mj story, im so freaking done with everything related to his death
    penelope and her sister do look alike, i just think her sister’s face is a lil more fug, she does have the nice body tho

  • to 19

    the only reason debbie has stepped forward is dollars, plain and simple. the poor girl was written out of michael’s will. she’s figured it out. the way to her hands on all of michael’s lovely money is get to custody of the children. no judge in his right mind would hand those children over to that woman. as for biology, you should know that being a biological mother does not always make you fit to raise a child.

  • Deeleym

    It’s all ‘wheels within wheels’ to me!….I’m so over it. I just hope the kids are happy; they seem really nice, realy normal. IMO, no-ones in a good position to take them – and Debbie Rowe is the WORST contender; she’s only interested in the money. MJs mother is far too old and although the jackson siblings could share the load, it would be a crying shame if that old *******, Joe Jackson got within 100 paces from them. It’s just such a mess – one of the the disadvantages of having too much money is the complicated mess it leaves behind!

    And the sooner the legal authorities stop these celebs. from getting these ‘designer’ babies so easily, the better. I loooove Ange Jolie, but the likes of her and Madonna, etc are making a laughing stock of the adoption agencies of certain 3rd world countries. For the big time celebs (MK included) all they have to do is flash all their money and they get whatever child they want, while the likes of us have to meet certain rigid criteria, often to be told we ‘are not suitable! Often these children are being raised in morally questionable homes, full of morally questionable people – go figure! And if they’re not morally questionable, they’re as neurotic and loopy as a too highly bred cat, to say the least!

  • D Wilson

    The custody hearing has been postphoned by both sides till July 20th. Maybe like some on CNN and other shows suggested that Debbie might been working on a settlement to go away again. Dont know for a fact just saying that is a option of choice for her since shes done it twice before and I heard shes said shes broke and its a little to convient that she now wants custody of the children now that they are worth money.
    D

  • D Wilson

    Looks like I was right. She only wanted money she NEVER cared about those beatiful babies. She just wanted another pay day and Micheal didnt leave her anything those she played the only card she had left. I hope she chokes on her 100 million and she doesnt desearve ANY visitation with those children PERIOD. She needs to go away for good this time:

    http://www.okmagazine.com/2009/07/jackson-custody-hearing-delayed/#comments

    However, some insiders speculate that the reason for this delay is to give the two sets of lawyers time to work out a financial settlement that would allow Katherine to keep the children, and leave Debbie very well-heeled.“She’s likely to walk away with a lump sum of money if she agrees not to seek custody,” a friend of Debbie tells OK! in the current issue. “She will probably end up with $100 million. It would be worth paying out, from the Jackson family’s point of view, to prevent a tug-of-war for the children.”

  • D Wilson

    Looks like I was right. She only wanted money she NEVER cared about those beatiful babies. She just wanted another pay day and Micheal didnt leave her anything those she played the only card she had left. I hope she chokes on her 100 million and she doesnt desearve ANY visitation with those children PERIOD. She needs to go away for good this time:

    http://www.okmagazine.com/2009/07/jackson-custody-hearing-delayed/#comments

    However, some insiders speculate that the reason for this delay is to give the two sets of lawyers time to work out a financial settlement that would allow Katherine to keep the children, and leave Debbie very well-heeled.“She’s likely to walk away with a lump sum of money if she agrees not to seek custody,” a friend of Debbie tells OK! in the current issue. “She will probably end up with $100 million. It would be worth paying out, from the Jackson family’s point of view, to prevent a tug-of-war for the children.”

  • http://justjared.buzznet.com/2009/07/09/debbie-rowe-i-never-wanted-to-be-a-mother/ Jackie

    @cutie pie: Cutie pie you make me piss myself i think everthing you said about greedy BITCH rowe is all TRUE

  • http://justjared.buzznet.com/2009/07/09/debbie-rowe-i-never-wanted-to-be-a-mother/ Jackie

    i HATE Greedy Bitch Debbie Rowe She does not want Michael’s Kids she only wants money, money, money that’s all on her mind every year Michael would pay her because he loved his kids more than anything. And she does not want them she only cash that all on her mind i hope she losses and congrats to Debbie Rowe she is now the most hated woman in America and Britain Maybe she might want cash for being the most hated woman

  • http://justjared.buzznet.com/2009/07/09/debbie-rowe-i-never-wanted-to-be-a-mother/ Jackie

    Rowe is a GREEDY BITCH

  • http://justjared.buzznet.com/2009/07/09/debbie-rowe-i-never-wanted-to-be-a-mother/ Jackie

    Debbie your face makes me feel sick

  • http://weightloss-help.info suppress your appetite

    =]]] ]]]]]]]] ]] ]]]]]] ]] ]] ]]]]] ]]]]] ] ]]

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here