Top Stories

Michael Jackson: Kids Portraits Revealed

Michael Jackson: Kids Portraits Revealed
  • Michael Jackson’s life as a dad.
  • Miranda Kerr poses in nearly nothing.
  • Robert Pattinson’s hair falls flat.
  • Rosario Dawson breaks out her bikini.
  • Rachel Maddow rips Pat Buchanan a new one for racist diatribe.
  • Rihanna’s new mohawk is turning heads.
  • Kate Beckinsale runs some errands.
  • Ashlee Simpson takes baby Bronx for a walk.
  • David Beckham strips for his fans.
  • Collin Farrel is filming his latest movie London Boulevard.
  • Tony Romo gambles his feelings away.
  • The Washington State Patrol says The Passion of the Christ actor James Caviezel suffered cuts and bruises when a man hurled a bicycle into the path of his Harley-Davidson motorcycle on Thursday. Following the incident, the 40-year-old actor was taken to Cascade Medical Center in Leavenworth. Mental issues may be involved in why the man tossed the bike in Caviezel’s direction.
  • Jennifer Aniston reportedly spent $1,000 on lingerie at Only Hearts on Mott St. in SoHo.
  • Common and Serena Williams are still going strong. The rapper and tennis champ were spotted smooching in Central Park the other day.
  • 19-year-old Harry Potter actor Jamie Waylett, who plays Vincent Crabbe in the film series, pleaded guilty yesterday to illegally growing 10 cannabis plants at his mother’s London home.
Like Just Jared on Facebook

JJ Links Around The Web

Christopher Polk/Getty

36 Comments

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All
# 1

:):):)”):):)

# 2

beatiful…sweet

RIP MICHAEL JACKSON

# 3
thats_right @ 07/17/2009 at 2:08 pm

Cute kids, Michael I love you sooooooooo much
R I P

# 4

OK is obessed with those kids, it’s sick

# 5

How sad. Michael kept his kids away from the media and protected their privacy. And now even the Jackson family are selling them out.

# 6

Wow! Michael Jackson’s kids look exactly like him when he was their age.

You can’t deny Michael is the father.

# 7

I’m getting kind of tired of these people like Maddow who claim that, if you say anything negative about a minority, then you are a racist. I am a black woman and if Sotomayor had said a Latina woman could make a BETTER decision than a black person, you know the entire black community, Al Sharpton, etc., would have demanded she withdraw. In this case, Pat Buchanan is right to be upset.

# 8

“the wise latina” is either lying and commiting perjury or she’schizophrenic!

Congrat to newest “affirmative action lottery winner”

Best person for the job, not by a long shot, best affirmative action, fat, old, fugly ****-looking latina female, you betcha!

# 9

I’m sorry but Michael is freaky looking and why did he dye his son’s hair blond? WTF ???? He had mental issues.

Jenny – I AGREE!! beautiful kids. mj was such a doting father!!!

Gwen Stefani dyes Kingstons haor
Angelina Jolie dyes Maddox and Pax’s hair
No one’s b*tching about that
Paris had really pretty eyes
R.I.P Michael Jackson

u are in lalaland @ 07/17/2009 at 4:38 pm

@Jenny:

Oh Yeah I can see the resemblance too,blonde hair and white skin just like when he was in the jackson 5<<<<<<rolling eyes

so effing tired of hearing about mj, leave the damn guy alone already
those have 2 be about the sexiest pics of miranda i have seen in a while, i no it’s photoshopped but her ass looks great =D
lol, i havent seen kate if freaking months
boring pics tho, looks the same as ever

lol. thanks jared. i hope you saw it too before you posted it. my favourite was “white people built america”. lmfao. lovely.

Scottie Dog @ 07/17/2009 at 5:38 pm

Miss Michael Jackson terribly and pray that his children get a better chance at life then he did when he was a youngster. Rest in Peace Dear Michael.

Oh my God, in the young pictures of Paris look the spitting image of Arnie Kline. I never saw it b4 but now I think he is the sperm donor.

@Flo:
You are a nut.

The both look like Michael when he was young.

sillyputty @ 07/17/2009 at 6:23 pm

# 6 Jenny..

you are crazy. They don’t resemble him at all. zero. He is NOT the father….Get your head out of the clouds.

They are white and MJ is not. Huge difference…stupid

@mertz:

Hey, mertz, who did?

michael o. @ 07/17/2009 at 7:15 pm

@sillyputty:

Uh duh! The kids have the same skin disease as he did.

prince and paris are sooo cute!!

Jamie Waylett is an idiot. I can’t believe he did something that dumb. He’s completely screwed up his chances of being in the 7th Harry Potter movie!

I wish I could bet money on it because i knew in my guts as soon as i saw pictures 7 & 8 that Paris is definitely Arnold Klein’s kid.

rhonda @ 07/17/2009 at 6:51 pm @mertz:

Hey, mertz, who did?
———————————————–
did you actually click on the link and see what happened on rachel maddow’s show…and reading your comments about sotomayor reminded me of exactly everything i’ve heard from republicans concerning this nominee. i’m not even an american citizen and i know that the republicans adhere to the code that the president always gets his way with his sc pick. that’s point one. the next point, actually made by constitutional lawyers, the American Barristers Association, and many other judges, laywers, people in the legal community is that even if you don’t agree with her decisions she is one of the most experienced judges in your country picked as a nominee and going to the bench, and that is flatly based on how many cases she has heared and made rulings on. the next point, is that although she may be a democratic pic, she does not lean right nor left. she is middle of the rode and gives credence to precedents and then applies the law to the issue (s) before her. did you even watch any of these hearings? do you even know who she is? i mean why the hell is it that the naysayers ugh, only have two talking points when it comes to her yet say oh she is overly qualified for the job. give me a freakin break. for more than 40 years these hearings have been political posturing and farces, but when it comes to the year 2009, people gain a conscious and all of a sudden want to change the way things are done. lol. hypocrisy is a beautiful thing. and on to the next point. i don’t know what you know about affirmative action, but to say it only benefits people of colour is disfreakingingenous, so please learn a little bit about your own policies/programs before making general glib commentary. she is not just a product of affirmative action, but she is smart (lol at lindsay graham questioning her and agreeing with her that she is a part of the intellectual class. what bunch of idiots republicans are…and some dems are no better, but atleast they made no waves during this hearing. left it to the gop to dig themselves into a big hole dictating the confirmation hearing. surprised not as many republicans decided to hang themselves even more. the public perception and the strong imagery still worked against them though since it did look like lots of white old men attacking a latina lady. lol. too good) and she is also a product of hard work and luck. i mean not all of us minorities can get a break like some of those “legacy” republicans who for a fact we know don’t like school and pay people to do their work for them…lol, dubya jr anyone? anyways so here’s the video, i will post the huffopost one because they have it broken down in sections, and i don’t want to hit up the youtube, or you can watch the msnbc clip. if you knew anything about her or followed american politics you would know that she’s been on the federal bench, in the lower courts as well, you would know that although she might be a liberal pick from the thousands of cases she’s presided over she has decreed ruling that republicans who look at facts would know that she rules mostly in favour for YOUR SIDE, she’s not one to make precedent lightly, or even make waves, but she applies law, and and and she’s been a nominee 4 FCUCKING TIMES and was a pick of the original bush, bush the first. so you know what, don’t give me that bullsh*t about what she said about the wise latina comment. although she was in the end overruled when her case went to the supreme court she had 4 judges on the bench who AGREED with her and the way she had read the law in new haven, because she applied the law of that area and had used a case that had come before hand in that same area to make a determination, and she was right in the end. she was overturned, obviously, because the sc has to apply the law of the land to the case (which sotomayor also should have, but she wasn’t really wrong. she stuck to the facts that were presented to her), and she wasn’t the one who was wrong, the law in connecticut or wherever new haven is, is what was flawed.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/vp/31952924#31952924

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here