Top Stories

Angelina Jolie Replaces Charlize Theron as 'Tourist'

Angelina Jolie Replaces Charlize Theron as 'Tourist'

Angelina Jolie is in talks to replace Charlize Theron in the thriller The Tourist.

THR is reporting Charlize dropped out after being attached to the project for a long time. Producers are now looking to find a director to helm the movie.

The Tourist is about an Interpol agent (Jolie) in Europe who manipulates an American tourist (Sam Worthington) in an attempt to flush out an elusive criminal who was her former lover.

Aussie Sam, 33, has been much buzzed about since Terminator Salvation. He next stars in James Cameron’s Avatar, out in December.

Sam and Angie? Um, HOT!

Like Just Jared on Facebook
Credit: Axelle; Photos: Bauergriffinonline
Posted to: Angelina Jolie, Charlize Theron

JJ Links Around The Web

Christopher Polk/Getty

928 Comments

# 1

Angie and Sam ….. SO HOT !!!!!

# 2

Omg she’s so HOT

# 3

I love you too Charlize =)

# 4

…but Aeon Flux bombed

# 5

Wow!!! HOT!

# 6

But ummm, who’s “Sam”?

# 7

Angie needs another check to support her child army. She just needs 2 more to get her own reality show on TLC.

# 8

^^^^Dumba**

# 9

Why is this stated as fact when it’s only a rumor?

angie's old nose @ 10/11/2009 at 5:23 pm

Good grief…she always plays the same part. (ok, the two times she didn’t, the movie was a box office disapointment)

veingelina Jolie @ 10/11/2009 at 5:24 pm

LuckyL—-oser is on here 24/7.

That movie sounds a lot like “Salt” which she just made. And, anyway, it’s just a rumor. There is also a rumor going around that Angelina is being asked to do “Wanted 2″ and she still has the “Scarpetti” movie to get off the ground and, since she is taking a year off, she won’t be available for any of this until June of 2010.

I sometimes think people bring up Angelina’s name just to get publicity for their movie (“Catwoman” for instance). Why would Charlize drop out of a movie? The girls needs a hit BADLY since her last two or three have bombed. Was she dumped? Why would Angelina want to do a movie that Charlize Theron turned down and that sounds just like the one she just did? This doesn’t make sense and I don’t believe it.

Also, who is Sam Worthington???? Guess I could google him. I will, if this turns out to be true. Otherwise, I don’t care who he is!!

Liverwurst @ 10/11/2009 at 5:26 pm

Angelina could be sexy if she only had a hot body.

@mslewis: Ease back from the caffine girly.

They both are overrated, but if i had to choose I would say Charlize is the beter actress. Angie is just recognized becasue of who she is dating/shacking up with ( Brad Pitt)

hollywood general rule of thumb: if you’re gonna make any sort of action chick flick, Angelina Jolie is more bang for the buck, kids.

if this is true I will be happy for Angie . yay!

I can’t believe they didn’t think of Jennifer Aniston. She’s just as good of an actress as these two Oscar winners! :P

Angelina is gonna f.u.c.k Sam just like she did with Brad since he is equally hot. I don’t get the hype for Sam worthington, I mean, yeah, he’s hot but the movie Terminator he was in was freakin’ lame and boring, ugh. Anyway, I’m not saying this against Angelina. I’m saying this because she’s super gorgeous and she oozes some unique sexiness. What co-star wouldn’t want to get her in his bed? haha. I’m juuuuust kiddin’, she can’t, she’s a mother of six. Anyway, I also think the better actress is Charlize but the hottest is Angelina even if she doesn’t have the sexiest body of all time #13! Have you seen her sex scene in her movie “taking lives”??? The sexiest sex scene ever done in Hollywood history IMO !!!!! XD …..This is a rumor. I’ll take it seriously when it’s a fact =)

I love Charlize as well but lets hope this is not because they want to use Angies name to get publicity for their movie. Jared please make sure it is true before you post this kind of things.

@la sigh.: Thanks!! I just finished my afternoon tea and was a little hyped!!! I’m calm now!!

Still, I don’t understand why Charlize dropped out of this movie. This sounds like something she would be good in. However, she has had nothing but bombs since her Oscar win. I’m just wondering if she was pushed. I do like her and I hope she hasn’t ruined her career by bad choices. Charlize is a good actress but people in The Business only love you for how well you’ve done lately. Oscar means nothing if you can’t get big box office numbers and Angelina does get big box office!!

@sofia: Jennifer was probably first on their list but she was already scheduled for some tanning in Mexico and turned them down!! A girl has to have her priorities straight. Maybe next time!!

I’ll watch Angelina Joile in anything.

groundcontrol @ 10/11/2009 at 5:47 pm

They are probably just floating this rumor to keep their investors interested.
.
I took a trip over to one of the blogs Samuels cites as concerned with Zee’s hair.
Well, what do you know. The overwhelming support is for Zee’s natural and beautiful and Angie’s handling of Zee’s hair. Most of the posters there equally condemn all the manipulaiton of AA hair as well as think people should lay off a 4 year old who is someone else’s child.
.
Black Hair Media forum. I think this link may go to the middle of the thread. The thread is 17 pages since Oct 6, 2009.
.
http://forum.blackhairmedia.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=218743&PID=4917253

alexanderina @ 10/11/2009 at 5:47 pm

if this is true that would be awesome and plus I like Sam he was awesome in Terminator

@mslewis: You’re probably right. Girl is nothing if not predictable – I mean, consistent.

Oh, and yeah – THR said she’s “in talks to replace,” not “replacing.”

alexanderina @ 10/11/2009 at 5:49 pm

hmmmmm JJ is still crazy as always with the nutjobs trolls

Salt, Wanted2 and Tourist all action movies. I don’t know. I hope Angie would mix action and drama movies.

How come the constant pitting Angelina and Charlize against each other lately? Hummmm.

Both great actresses

Not impressed by JA @ 10/11/2009 at 6:21 pm

an oldie @ 10/11/2009 at 6:12 pm How come the constant pitting Angelina and Charlize against each other lately? Hummmm.

———————————–
Both are former models turned serious actress with an Oscar on their sleeves and are born the same year..

.
Charlize is extremely beautiful, she is really talented but she has ZERO and i mean ZERO charisma and national appeal, let alone international appeal.
.
I really don’t know why. Ever since she appears, i thought she was absolutely beautiful but for some reasons, she can’t direct the light towards her. She can’t draw people to the theater on her name solely. Never had, never will. Oh and this rule also applied to the media. She is just doesn’t sell whatsoever , even in advertisment. Actresses, usually brunettes are better sellers..

I would love to see sam w and angie in a movie together. Sw is hotter and younger than Brad.

I hope Angie has an affair with Sam.

Cdan’t wait

interesting @ 10/11/2009 at 6:26 pm

Charlize Theron replaces Angie in Atlas Shrugged and Angie may replace Charlize Theron in The Tourist.

angie AND charlize..now tTHAT would be hot!

I know, #11. And she always rags on me when I hang out here even though nowhere near as much as she does.

How could you not have heard of Sam Worthington, #21? He stole Terminator 4 earlier this year.

Actors turn down roles for many reasons. Scheduling conflicts is a likely reason. Why wouldn’t Jolie take on a role that someone turned down? It’s not like the role would be spoiled goods or something. And how is it anything like Salt?

Not impressed by JA @ 10/11/2009 at 6:33 pm

hi @ 10/11/2009 at 6:24 pm I hope Angie has an affair with Sam.

————————————-
Angie’s no Cougar.
.
That’s Maniston thang to go out with younger men who star with Angelina (cough, cough, Vince) or dream about Angelina (cough, cough Mayer).
.
She is THAT obsessed !

#32: I agree with you. It is a phenomenon most of us can’t understand. Sometimes the most beautiful woman may come off blan on screen. Charlize is one of those drope dead gorgeous women who comes off i don’t know what it is…maybe too ethereal, or too passive, or too something. She has become the HUGE star she deserves. I don’t think it is a brunette or blonde thing. Somehow Cate Blanchett who is less beautiful than Charlize is more interesting on screen. Can’t explain it. It’s a mystery. You either got it or you don’t. Angelina Jolie has the IT factor for sure. It’s a powerful thing when men and women are seduced by a woman like that.

Liverwurst @ 10/11/2009 at 5:26 pm
Angelina could be sexy if she only had a hot body.
*****************************************************************************************

ROTFLMBAO!!! Posted while sitting on your size 42 ass with your boobs resting on your knees, yeah, right.

i meant charlize has not become the huge star she deserves despite her stunning beauty and amazing talent. her oscar performance was out of this world. she just has not translated to the mainstream for some reason. i think she is beautiful but not sexual..is that possible?

I love Angie.. big big fan.. and I love Charlize. I don’t like it when they try to pit one woman against another..

since I think they are bothy beyond beautiful and talented I would love to see them do a film together.. That would be so off the freakin Chain.. I think they have a lot in common and are two really strong minded women..

I love that Angie works when she wants, and does not feel the need to put out 2 or 3 movies every year. Damn some people it seems as if we see them in a new film every week.. Give us time to miss your faces on screen. It will be over a year since Angie last worked. So 2010 is going to be a treat for her fans..

Glad she and Brad are off and just enjoying family time.. NOW if only the media and the haters would leave them the H e ll alone.

@sofia:

ROFLMAO………..YOU CAN’T BE SERIOUS. BWAAAHAHAHA. Aniston couldn’t act her way out of a wet paper bag; she’s the flop queen who will never get a another chance to open a movie after two major box office and critical jokes……….she still has a few in the can she will be ‘trying’ to get distributed……….good luck to her

On the other hand, Angie is an Oscar winning and again Oscar nominated most powerful female HW star…………so dream on sucker.

They need to stop using Angie’s name to get publicity for that film.

let's see @ 10/11/2009 at 6:42 pm

Sam is hot. Brad is hotter even though he is older than Sam. I will take Brad any time. I don’t understand why Angie takes another role similar to Salt. I love how Brad takes diverse roles.

@happy girl: I agree with you that Charlize doesn’t come off as “sexy” and has zero charisma. You just aren’t drawn to her on the screen. I don’t understand it either. She is hardly ever on any of those stupid “most beaufitul” lists. I mean, I know those lists don’t mean anything but, evidently, when people are asked to list their most beautiful stars, Charlize’s name never comes up. It’s strange but it proves that you can be beautiful and still not connect with the audience. Guess that’s why she can’t carry a movie on her own. Poor Charlize. She really is a good actress, I think.

The Bruiser @ 10/11/2009 at 6:44 pm

Well then lets hope this film and Salt is not like Angie’s other 8 major flop films.

@dawne: Honey, Sofia and I were JOKING!! Guess you didn’t get it. Sorry!!

Theron is Waaaaaaaaaaay hotter than Ms. Black

@interesting: There is no “Atlas Shrugged” and Charlize was never replacing anybody in it. Angelina has the rights to “Atlas” and she had been trying to get it filmed but it has proven to be impossible and, after several scripts were presented to Angelina, she has decided not to do it at all.

Really, do you think anybody would back a movie as complicated as “Atlas” with Charlize Theron in it when the woman has never had a hit movie? Do you think the “money people” would back something like that? I don’t think so, especially if Charlize was dumped from “Tourist.” I’m afraid poor Charlize will be lucky to get any movie after this.

I’m watching M&MS for what is in no doubt the 100th time.. I love this movie and it never gets old.. Doug Liman and the studio that made it needs to get off their as*s and release an anniversery issue in Blue ray.. ASAP.. and they need to issue a 3 box set with all the sh*t Doug and company cut out in order to protect the frail feelings of Jenny poo and the Jennatics.. they are sitting on a freakin GOLD MINE..

and to the poster how said that the sex scene in Taking Lives was hot.. So true. They only thing was Ethan just looked creepy and that threw me a bit. but that was just too hot.. Angie was just stunning and sexy. Without even trying. same in M&MS you really did not see much skin from either of them.. but they heated up the screen like Summer in the South.. and if you have been to the South in the summer you know what I am talking about. The Chemistry was just jumping off the screen.. and that heat can’t be fake.

I have not heard anything else about Wanted 2. last thing I heard was that Angie had the script.. but just like Brad said recently.. don’t believe everything you read. Just like they had Brad making tons of movies we found out that he does not like to attach himself to films years in advance.. so that he is available if something interesting comes up. Besides Angie can’t make that many movies in a year if she and Brad take turns. which they have done for close to 5 years..

OK the fight scene is on and that is sexy too..

putrid actress @ 10/11/2009 at 6:56 pm

Stay home with your patchwork family Ang. People can live without your acting more than your kids can without a mom.

too bad. I definitely prefer Theron.

@lisa: I saw “Taking Lives” just a week or so ago. Since I got Netflix, I’m catching up on Angie and Brad movies. I always thought Ethan Hawke was nasty looking, which is why I never saw this movie when it was in the theatres/cable. But, I liked it very much, especially the ending, which almost gave me a heart attack!! My next Angie movie will be “Beyond Borders” and I hope that one is good also. Plus, I totally agree with you on “Mr. and Mrs.” Totally HOT movie!!!

Angie and Sam … yes, yes, yes ! But I doubt it’s true

ANOTHER BOMB UNDER HER BELT! LOL!!!

You want a real stretch for Angelina the actress?…………hows about Angie plays a stay-at-home mother…..she can’t pull it off….

@The Bruiser:

I think you are confusing Ms. Jolie with someone else.. If Angie makes flops then you need to address the movies of Kate W, Meryl, Anne H, Nicole, Reese and countless others whose films have not made what Angie’s movies have pulled in. Changeling made more money then any of the movies of the other nominated actresses last year.. If she makes flops.. then I am sure every Actress in hollywood wants to make those kind of flops too..

Please get your facts straight before you post something that makes you seem a bit dumb.

@putrid actress:

Jeeeeezuz, bigots are the ugliest people on the planet and you are leading the herd.

I n F a m o u s l y C o o l @ 10/11/2009 at 7:03 pm

..charlize is so fcuking hot. jolie would be a downgrade.

@I n F a m o u s l y C o o l:

keep trying, troll. If you hate Angie so much why do you spend more time on her threads that some fans? She will remain the international superstar and icon whether you waste your time sneering on her threads or not. Why waste your time? Don’t you have an Aniston flop to watch? Mismanagement is out on DVD, you know.

The Bruiser @ 10/11/2009 at 7:11 pm

@susan:

Angie’s Flops:

Original Sin
Domestic: $16,534,221
+ Foreign: $18,868,099
= Worldwide: $35,402,320
Budget: 42 Million dollars, not counting marketing and advertising

Life or Something Like It
Domestic: $16,534,221
+ Foreign: $18,868,099
= Worldwide: $35,402,320
Budget: 40 Million dollars, not counting marketing and advertising

Beyond Borders
Domestic: $4,430,101
+ Foreign: $7,274,901
= Worldwide: $11,705,002
Budget: 35 Millin dollars not counting marketing and advertising

Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow
Domestic: $37,762,677
+ Foreign: $20,196,019
= Worldwide: $57,958,696
Budget: 70 Million dollars, not counting advertising and marketing

Alexander
Domestic: $34,297,191
+ Foreign: $133,001,001
= Worldwide: $167,298,192
Budget: 155 Million dollars, not counting advertising and marketing

Taking Lives
Domestic: $32,682,342
+ Foreign: $32,788,187
= Worldwide: $65,470,529
Budget: 45 Million dollars not counting advertising and marketing

The Good Shepard
Domestic: $59,952,835
+ Foreign: $39,527,645
= Worldwide: $99,480,480
Budget: 110 Million dollars, not counting marketing and advertising

A Mighty Heart
Domestic: $9,176,787
+ Foreign: $9,758,870
= Worldwide: $18,935,657
Budget: 16 Million dollars, not counting marketing and advertising

Changeling
Domestic: $35,739,802
+ Foreign: $77,254,202
= Worldwide: $112,994,004
Budget: 55 Million dollars, not counting marketing and advertising

Not impressed by JA @ 10/11/2009 at 7:16 pm

To Happy Girl
i meant charlize has not become the huge star she deserves despite her stunning beauty and amazing talent. her oscar performance was out of this world. she just has not translated to the mainstream for some reason. i think she is beautiful but not sexual..is that possible?

—————————————————————-
I think that it has to do with power/attraction/charisma factor.
.
Charlize index is very low in that department and it is a pitty cause she is gorgeous. Someone like Renee Zellwegger hgas even more charisma than her. Consequently she can only play second fiddle in a movie and never be the main draw.
.
Another ex blond model turned actress who doesn’t have her amount of beauty and yet has more charisma is Cameron Diaz.

The Bruiser @ 10/11/2009 at 7:18 pm

Silly me. I forgot to post the source on the above post:

http://www.boxofficemojo.com

Boy am I dumb.

Angelina is a kick a** action star!

I can’t wait to see it.

Max Bialystock @ 10/11/2009 at 7:20 pm

Angie is a sure thing for certain producers looking for a tax break flop.

da truth truth prevails @ 10/11/2009 at 7:21 pm

@The Bruiser:

Let’s see Angie’s last three films made over 1 BILLION $$$$$.

No flops for her, Angie is the ultimate A-Lister, world mega star. She only makes one film a year and is still at the top of the pyramid for film roles. This woman has got IT going on.

Now now, You are just confused poor dear, Angie was not in Non-Management or Love Doesn’t Happen, those MAJOR FLOPS.

I know you fell and hit your head and are living in lala land, right? So I am here and quite willing to educate you as to the verifiable truth.

I do wonder why Charlize would exit this, she badly needs a hit film .

Well IF Angie does this it will be 2nd film TomC was once attached to and left that Angie stars in. Woman power!!!

the movie sounds pretty interesting
hope she does it

Angelina is the most sought out actress, she must be doing something right.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/11/2009 at 7:26 pm

Charlize selling power has never been among the biggest ones : Jolie, Reese, Julia, Sandra, Halle, hell, even Maniston, hence i don’t remembered her ever being paid 10 + M for a movie role
.
With the exception of 2 movies with a big male name : Hancok & the Italin Job , she has never hit 100,000,000 domestically. Add the ‘Devil’s advocate’ and here you have the ONLY three movies within her ENTIRE career where she hit 100 M WORLWIDE.
.
As for ther bombs, they are in the league of mismanagement….mega implosion around 1 – 5 M, sometimes even less than 1 M WORLWIDE.

Wasn’t Hancock a hit? or Was it only a Will Smith movie not Charlize Theron movie ?

veingelina Jolie @ 10/11/2009 at 5:24 pm

LuckyL—-oser is on here 24/7.
___
I’m home sick for the weekend =) Obviously you stock me 24/7 whenever I am on. Maybe even moreso than you stock Brangelina threads *wink*

*Yawn* Days I’m here, days I’m not. Why are you so worried?

Zahara hair supporter @ 10/11/2009 at 7:28 pm

LETTER EMAILED TO NEWSWEEK:
__

Dear Newsweek,
___

I have never been so repulsed by a Newsweek article as I was when I read Allison Samuels “Zahara Jolie-Pitt and the politics of uncombed hair”!! Are you SERIOUS?…
___

I don’t think news outlets should be in the business of writing about or critiqueing the merrits of a 4 year old’s hairstyle, much less berating the mother about her parenting skills or lack-there-of!!
___
What’s more, it’s quite hipocritical that these parenting standards seem only to apply to Mr. Pitt and Mrs. Jolie and their children, but not to Heidi Klum’s kids, Kimora Lee-Simmons kids, Will and Jada Smiths kids, or Thandie Newtons kids! All these other celebrity parents have allowed their childrens hair to be loose and free and in a natural afro style! Just because Zaharra’s hair has been styled like this moreso is no reason to single her or Angelina out as a parent with a child who has messy unkempt hair!
___
As any woman of African heritage knows, depending on your type of hair, you can sometimes wash, condition, and grease African hair, and it will STILL look as though you just rolled out of bed without attempting to style it! It is just the natural nature of our hair! Furthermore, the picture of Zahara being held by Angelina, which is used for the blog article, clearly shows that Zahara has adorable, shiny black curls to her hair, which indicates that it is WELL taken care of. To suggest anything else is cruel, ignorant, and racially insensitive! I would expect much more of a news outlet such as yours, but I guess journalism has lost the class and quality that it once had in the days of Edward R. Murrow! Newsweek has now deteriorated to notions held on the front of TABLOIDS! Congradulations.
___
That said, I believe you owe BOTH Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie AND Zahara an apology for writing this type of article, which reinforces ignorance with regard to the racial stereotype of ‘good’ hair versus ‘bad’ hair. To infer that Zahara’s hair is not being take care of just because her hair is being worn in it’s natural afro-styled state really sets the civil rights movement back 50 years, as it negates the perogative of CHOICE with regard to black womens hairdo’s. It also insults the African culture!
__
I applaud Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt for a lot of things, but most of all for not conforming to the restrictive, negative, and ignorant views of society, but most of all, raising their children to have a sense of their own comfort and freedom. Newsweek could take a lesson from them, and so could the apparently self-hating Allison Samuels!
___

FORMER Newsweek reader!

The Bruiser @ 10/11/2009 at 7:30 pm

@da truth truth prevails:

Quote: “Let’s see Angie’s last three films made over 1 BILLION $$$$$. ”

They weren’t just her films although she was in them, she was not the star attraction. And one of them she was just a voice. Did you notice my post on Angie’s Flops? Reconcile those if you would please.

Read more: http://justjared.buzznet.com/2009/10/11/angelina-jolie-replaces-charlize-theron-as-touristangelina-jolie-charlize-theron-the-tourist/all-comments/#comments#ixzz0TfmoUAc2

@The Bruiser:

Oh Jen having a very bad day are you? The Baster re-shoots got you down after the poor test audiences reactions?

I know you can’t get cast in action or drama or any other type role but lame rom coms. The big male comedy stars run from you these days don’t they? Well you are too old for them, they cast younger women like VV just did in his hit film and like Ben Stiller does and like Jim Carrey does and Adam Sandler does.

Face it Jen you are over the hill for rom com leads with bigtime comedy males. Hey that’s life tv gurl.

Bruiser, snoozer, Jen, get a life. Your list reveals the depth of your obsession. Angie is out living her happy life, snuggling and cuddling with her loved ones, she does not have time for blogs.

I am sure Norman Aniston is crying out for your attention while you are here. Go give the love of your life a hug woman after you crawl into his doggy bed as you said that is where you like to sleep.

Bruiser what is your point?

As soon as Angie’s name mentioned the haters rushed here to show us their nervousness per usual.lol
I love her she has what it takes for it. If this true, they will be lucky to have her and more luck to the movie lovers as Angie will be good to it.

Kung Fu Panda

Total US Gross $215,434,591
+ International Gross $416,475,940
= Worldwide Gross $631,910,531
“““
Wanted

Total US Gross $134,508,551
+ International Gross $206,426,217
= Worldwide Gross $340,934,768
“““`
Gone in 60 seconds
Total US Gross $101,643,008
+ International Gross $131,000,000
=Worldwide Gross $232,643,008
“““““““““““`

Shark Tale
Total US gross $ 160,861,908
+ International gross $ 206,413,111
= worldwide gross $ 367,275,019

““““““““““““““
Mr. and Mrs. Smith

Total US Gross $186,336,279
+ International Gross $292,000,000
=Worldwide Gross $478,336,279
““`
Beuwolf
Total US Gross $82,195,215
+ International Gross $112,800,000
=Worldwide Gross $194,995,215
“““““
Lara Croft I
Total US Gross $131,144,183
+International Gross $143,500,000
=Worldwide Gross $274,644,183
““““““
Lara Croft II
Total US Gross $65,653,758
+International Gross $90,800,000
+Worldwide Gross $156,453,758

Hmm the paid hen (bad box office accountant) should be out supporting Sh*it Happens. Looks like it flopped overseas. So much for the ole plant, bait and deny routine of Your Hairness’s inept PR flack and paid hens. Hens are too busy stalking the Jolie Pitts to care about ole lonely girl. Shame. AJ has a Partner and 6 adorable children. Whiny Jen has her faithful hens pleading her case and begging the powers to be in Hollyweird to give her one more chance to make another lame rom com crapfest. I pity the fool who finance another “worst romantic comedy of the year” of ole devastated girl. Then again, a sucker is born every minute and a whiny hen is sure to be smearing, lying and fudging facts on a BP and AJ thread.

jen the HACK-TRESS @ 10/11/2009 at 7:43 pm

WOW! HOLLYWOOD IS STARTING TO REALIZE THE LIMITED TALENT OF JENNIFER ANISTON, FINALLY!!!…..They even refer to her as a ‘ONE TRICK PONY’ in this article….OUCH!! LOL!

__

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/features/theres-something-about-jennifer-1800602.html

The Bone Collector

Total US Gross $66,488,090
+ International Gross $84,975,000
= Worldwide Gross $151,463,090

da truth truth prevails @ 10/11/2009 at 7:43 pm

@The Bruiser:

I can’t stop laughing at you. Not her films? HaHaHa

Wonder then why she got top billing in them?

What a worthless silly waste of time you are. I won’t bother to go back and list your idol’s flops, both those in the past and those in the present.

Don’t you know in Htown you are only as good as your last film, and Angelina Jolie is solid gold world wide, money in the bank.

But then you know the truth, you just can’t handle it, you weak spineless whiner.

The truth prevails and surmounts garbage like you. Even those of like minds are laughing at you.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/11/2009 at 7:44 pm

If you want a better perspective about the magnitude and consistency of Charlize bombs, hence her selling power, here are the facts :
.
* 10 movies out of 29 with a domestic figures less than 10 M
* 3 out of them amount to less than 1 M worlwide with an investment cost at 20 M+
* 5 out of them amount at less than 5 M worldwide with an investment cost at 20 M+
* Three movies amounted at 100 M + included Hancock
* two movies amounted at 100 M+ domestically included Hancock
* 4 out of her last 5 movies are mega bombs (less than 10 M worldwide, some even less than 1 M), exception : Hancock
* Since her Oscar, she has made 8 movies : all of them : mega bombs (5 out of 7 less than 10 M worldwide) : EXCEPTION : Hancock
.
That’s how consistent Charlie is in attracted people to the theater and i say this as one of her fan too. She has zero IT. Any prodicer who is also a businessman knows this. That’s why she is never among the best paid actresses, that’s why, she is never followed by paps or does few magazines cause her image doesn’t sell and has never will. Hence there is no progression curvbe whatsoever : it’s flat.
.
She has no star power which is a shame. Period.

Angie—-sloppy 2nds—again

here here!! @ 10/11/2009 at 7:47 pm

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>this deserves posting again!!!!

LETTER EMAILED TO NEWSWEEK:
__

Dear Newsweek,
___

I have never been so repulsed by a Newsweek article as I was when I read Allison Samuels “Zahara Jolie-Pitt and the politics of uncombed hair”!! Are you SERIOUS?…
___

I don’t think news outlets should be in the business of writing about or critiqueing the merrits of a 4 year old’s hairstyle, much less berating the mother about her parenting skills or lack-there-of!!
___
What’s more, it’s quite hipocritical that these parenting standards seem only to apply to Mr. Pitt and Mrs. Jolie and their children, but not to Heidi Klum’s kids, Kimora Lee-Simmons kids, Will and Jada Smiths kids, or Thandie Newtons kids! All these other celebrity parents have allowed their childrens hair to be loose and free and in a natural afro style! Just because Zaharra’s hair has been styled like this moreso is no reason to single her or Angelina out as a parent with a child who has messy unkempt hair!
___
As any woman of African heritage knows, depending on your type of hair, you can sometimes wash, condition, and grease African hair, and it will STILL look as though you just rolled out of bed without attempting to style it! It is just the natural nature of our hair! Furthermore, the picture of Zahara being held by Angelina, which is used for the blog article, clearly shows that Zahara has adorable, shiny black curls to her hair, which indicates that it is WELL taken care of. To suggest anything else is cruel, ignorant, and racially insensitive! I would expect much more of a news outlet such as yours, but I guess journalism has lost the class and quality that it once had in the days of Edward R. Murrow! Newsweek has now deteriorated to notions held on the front of TABLOIDS! Congradulations.
___
That said, I believe you owe BOTH Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie AND Zahara an apology for writing this type of article, which reinforces ignorance with regard to the racial stereotype of ‘good’ hair versus ‘bad’ hair. To infer that Zahara’s hair is not being take care of just because her hair is being worn in it’s natural afro-styled state really sets the civil rights movement back 50 years, as it negates the perogative of CHOICE with regard to black womens hairdo’s. It also insults the African culture!
__
I applaud Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt for a lot of things, but most of all for not conforming to the restrictive, negative, and ignorant views of society, but most of all, raising their children to have a sense of their own comfort and freedom. Newsweek could take a lesson from them, and so could the apparently self-hating Allison Samuels!
___

FORMER Newsweek reader!

Thanks Jared for putting up Sam’s full name =) Will be looking him up

Charlize Theron is so beautiful, Angelina just doesn’t compare.

Elizabeth @ 10/11/2009 at 7:52 pm

@happy girl: Absolutey right. Somehow Angie attracts and really have the “it”. I will watch all her movie no matter what

angie oscar caliber actress @ 10/11/2009 at 7:53 pm

alexanderina @ 12/09/2008 at 9:51 pm
sorry if this is already posted

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117997127.html?categoryId=3248&cs=1

Angelina Jolie, ‘Changeling’
Eastwood’s new leading lady shows grit
By IAIN BLAIRMore Articles:
As a superstar actress, the tattooed Oscar winner (”Girl, Interrupted”) has always had fun tweaking conventional ideas about roles and identity — and people’s expectations of her.
That helps explain how the 33-year-old mother of six and staunch human rights advocate can seamlessly slip from playing the ultraviolent assassin of the summer hit “Wanted” into the heartbreaking role of “Changeling’s” Christine Collins, a single parent whose 9-year-old son vanishes into thin air in 1920s L.A.
Based on a true story, the Clint Eastwood-directed film also examines the nature of identity — the police insist that a runaway found in Illinois is her son, although he’s three inches shorter — and the role of the distraught mother proved to be a perfect fit for Jolie. Oscar-winning producer Brian Grazer approached Jolie “very early on, and once Clint was interested, I called her and that’s all I had to say,” he recalls. “She just said, ‘Let’s go.’ She was extremely enthusiastic. It wasn’t any gigantic producing skill on my part.
“It’s a tour de force for an actress, and many actresses wanted the part, because it’s appealing on so many levels,” he adds. “We spoke to Angie first, and she’s the one we wanted, because she has it all. She has credibility, intensity and evokes empathy, and that’s what you need in this character. She’s also very attractive and appealing, and that matters, because what’s going on in the film is so horrific.
“It’s such a tragedy and such a brutal role that in order for an audience to get through it, you not only have to have tremendous screen impact and presence, you have to have that sexual or female appeal, and Angie has all that.”
Once shooting began, Grazer was immediately “very impressed” by Jolie’s on-set demeanor.
“She’s enormously committed and dedicated, both as an actress and a mother,” he notes, “and so this project was right in the nexus of what is primordial to a woman — her relationship with her child. So the protection she’d naturally offer her kids in real life, coupled with her critical awareness of her own childhood and introspective observations of that, all contributed to her personal interest in the role. I marveled at her ability to connect with this character.”
Grazer also was amazed at Jolie’s ability to focus on the task at hand, “even while hundreds of paparazzi were often trying to take pictures,” he adds. “It never seemed to distract her, or from her complete connection to Clint and their relationship on set. I’ve never seen anything like it.”
Coming attractions
Jolie is attached to “The Mercenary: Love and Honor” from writer-director Randall Wallace, about the life of Russian dictator Catherine the Great.

@The Bruiser: Which of those movies did Angelina Jolie STAR in? You people blame Angie for every so-called flop like “Sky Captain” or “The Good Shepherd” but you don’t giver her credit for hits like “Wanted” and “Kung Fu”. What’s up with that? Angie was in about 20 minutes of “Sky” which starred Gwynnie Paltrow and Jude Law and “Shepherd” starred Matt Damon. And “Changling” made money in anybody’s book but yours!! “Wanted” hit the $300M mark and so did “Kung Fu” but those don’t count on your list. Stop the hating, honey. It makes you look stupid!!

Reese Witherspoon ranked number one on The Hollywood Reporter’s annual list of the highest-paid actresses. The 31-year-old actress commands $15 million to $20 million a movie.
Angelina Jolie came in second, and Cameron Diaz came in third with a $15 million-per-movie requirement.
While Angelina and Reese are now asking for $15 million-$20 million per movie, they frequently agree to “no-quote deals” — deals in which the studios actually pay them far less than their usual fee (usually when they take on supporting roles).

Here’s The Hollywood Reporter’s top ten list:
1. Reese Witherspoon — $15 million-$20 million
2. Angelina Jolie — $15 million-$20 million
3. Cameron Diaz — $15+ million
4. Nicole Kidman — $10 million-$15 million
5. Renee Zellweger — $10 million-$15 million
6. Sandra Bullock — $10 million-$15 million
7. Julia Roberts — $10 million-$15 million
8. Drew Barrymore — $10 million-$12 million
9. Jodie Foster — $10 million-$12 million
10. Halle Berry — $10 million
Stars climbing up the pay scale include Katherine Heigl, Rachel McAdams and Jennifer Garner.

Note, Aniston’s name is NO where on the list

Queen bee @ 10/11/2009 at 7:54 pm

I was just watching INTERVIEW WITH A VAMPIRE, and ladies…..Brad Pitt is, and ALWAYS WILL BE…..SIMPLY DELICIOUS!!!!!!!

………………

I was watching the scene where Antonio Banderes character said that he was absolutely “….BEAUTIFUL”, and I realized, EVERY CHARACTER IN THAT MOVIE WANTED BRAD PITT SOOOOO BAD!!!
…….

LESTAT played by Tom Cruise wanted Brad.
Antonio Banderas character wanted Brad.
Kirsten Dunst character wanted Brad. (as a father)
Thandie Newton’s character wanted Brad.
…….

….and the movie reeeeeally showed how desirable Brad Pitt really is….as it was talking about the humanity that showed through even though he was a ‘VAMPIRE’. It’s just like Brads great heart showing through to us fans, though he is in the heart of FLESH-EATING HOLLYWOOD!!

I can’t WAIT for all the Jolie-Pitt films!!

you forgot to mention last three movies made 1 billion world wide and there is no actress who have did that . you went ten years back to put Angie’s down. lol probably jennypoo really is having a nervous break down it goes down to the usual Angie bashing to the exterm .lol . Her two moives in the row bombed… the taste on turkey baster is no good…her hit in the past 10 years depended on either with the male star or dogs… how sad!

groundcontrol @ 10/11/2009 at 7:56 pm

Since when is anyone is a movie by themselves? Oh, wait. Swimming to Cambodia was one.
.
All 3 of Jolie’s most recent moveis were sold on her back. Even the cartoon. He11 they forced her to show up to sell the DVD.
.
The reseach on Wanted proved that a huge majority of those seeing it did so because Jolie was in it.
.
In any event who cares what some age old movies did. What matters now is her ability to make money now. Since at least 2005 [ Mr and Mrs Smith which ended up making $870 million with all revenue streams ] her movies have done very well – if not at the BO then as critical successes. No one expects to make money off A Mighty Heart which is why it was produced by Paramount Vantage – the prestige indy division. I am sure in the end AMH made some profit. It had a very low budget as well as a low marketing budget.

da truth truth prevails @ 10/11/2009 at 7:57 pm

@jen the HACK-TRESS:

One trick pony
dazat wrote:

Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 08:36 pm (UTC)
Ben, we know you like her. Have seen you fawn over her in the E interview(s). You’re a nice guy. Aniston has made a career off her marriage and now divorce. She started getting roles in films after hooking up with Pitt (1998). Look at her roles prior to the hook up. One or two good movies where she has minor roles. Producers trying to lure Pitt would throw her a bone. Once the split she and her PR machine panicked. Her 15 minutes were almost up, so they came up with the wronged ex-wife line, seeing a definite market. They demonize jolie (although not to the effect planned I’m sure as she is now considered the most powerful celebrity) hoping to continue capitalizing on the “left” woman audience. She was called out on the continued association after the promo tours for the dog movie and not into you, so she couldn’t get away with it for mgmt and **** happens (and look at the results). Now that **** happens is opening abroad they plant then deny (knowing no one will believe the denial) the same “brad wants me back” scheme they tried in the states. Everyone points to the good girl (which IMO was a depressed rachel) to prove she can act. Wasn’t that like 10 yrs ago? She is stereotyped as a romcom/dramady actress for sure, but she’s producing these films herself, and is getting a little long in the tooth to be believable in her own genre. The baster (a/k/a that ***** stole my man, now look what I have to do), love happens (just not to me), the divorce club (no comment). She’s milking the sympathies of her fans. Should we buy tickets to her mediocre films because we feel sorry for her? A good performance in a good film would alleviate the necessity of the PR games (make believe boyfriends, strategically timed bikini shots) but don’t think she’s capable of either.

Oh yeah, I would like to know how ShitHappens did in the UK, home of the FFers.@bdj:
ShitHappens bombed in the UK, the home country of the FFers? Oh boy. Meanwhile another of Filler Face’s ex got a $30+M first weekend opener. Ouch!

Not impressed by JA @ 10/11/2009 at 7:57 pm

Kelly @ 10/11/2009 at 7:51 pm Charlize Theron is so beautiful, Angelina just doesn’t compare.

————————————-
Too bad your opinion evidently isn’t shared by the majority. lol !

da truth truth prevails @ 10/11/2009 at 8:00 pm

@jen the HACK-TRESS:

she is just playing herself over and over – she can’t actually act!
lee_ji_me wrote:

Saturday, 10 October 2009 at 02:21 pm (UTC)
the character Rachel from Friends is kooky, shallow, pretty, funny, cute and a bit boring
She lost my interest the minute she became a mother in the series because Aniston could not act well enough to portray being a mother – she was cold and empty in this new aspect of Rachel – proving she can’t act and is also not a natural mothering type.
Since then we have seen her act out a proto type Rachel character in film after film – in fact, she is merely playing herself over and over again
Aniston, like many other mediocre actors got lucky with Friends – the face fit at the right time
Friends became a multi million dollar machine and the world fell in love with the characters.
The way Aniston looks, her golden American Californian aura has been sold over and over again and the public laps it up but it is wearing thin now as she ages and the parts are boring (Marley and me? ATROCIOUS!)
Never mind, she is rich beyond her wildest dreams but ultimately a lonely figure; the marriage to Brad Pitt seems to have formed a later Aniston – the wife with no kids and the man who left her to have kids (many) with another beautiful woman who really CAN act (Angelina Jolie)
Aniston is a sightly sad figure of contemporary celebrity culture which is for the most part manufactured and not based on true talent

@gupta: Isn’t this from over a year ago? Angelina gets “back-end” deals on some of her movies, thus she most likely earns far more than $15-20M.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/11/2009 at 8:07 pm

I said it again : Charlize is consistent in bimbs and their magnitude. She makes Maniston a successful, bankable actress by comparison and if you think MISMANAGEMENT is a bomb, look four out of her LAST 11 movies :
.
*Burning Plain : 157,532
*Battle in Seattle : $ 224,169
*Sleepwalking : $166,057
* Head in the Cloud : $ 398,278
*Walking Up Reno : $ 267,109
.
Those are domestic figures and the fiorst one is the recent one. Those movies for some hit 1 M worlwide, others didn’t.
.
And i put out there the worst bombs, cause most of there are others bombs with movies hitting less than 7 M.
.
And if you oppose the number ofg theaters, just compare to other movies. Try Renee last movies that was released in 4 theaters. She man

Not impressed by JA @ 10/11/2009 at 8:07 pm

I said it again : Charlize is consistent in bimbs and their magnitude. She makes Maniston a successful, bankable actress by comparison and if you think MISMANAGEMENT is a bomb, look four out of her LAST 11 movies :
.
*Burning Plain : 157,532
*Battle in Seattle : $ 224,169
*Sleepwalking : $166,057
* Head in the Cloud : $ 398,278
*Walking Up Reno : $ 267,109
.
Those are domestic figures and the fiorst one is the recent one. Those movies for some hit 1 M worlwide, others didn’t.
.
And i put out there the worst bombs, cause most of there are others bombs with movies hitting less than 7 M.
.
And if you oppose the number ofg theaters, just compare to other movies. Try Renee last movies that was released in 4 theaters. She man

I like seeing Angelina pictured next to a hot woman.
Angelina has a man’s jawline, a huge forehead and receding hairline.

I wonder how many times TopBrit/Liverwurst saw ShitHappens this weekend. LOL.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/11/2009 at 8:08 pm

Renee manages to pass 2 M domestically while Charlize with nearly 200 theaters didn’t even hit $200,000 !!!

LEGENDS OF THE FALL!!! @ 10/11/2009 at 8:09 pm

I was watching the LEGENDS OF THE FALL marathon on BRAVO channel last night, and I couldn’t help but think of Brad meeting the beautiful Angelina and her being the LOVE OF HIS LIFE when I saw the movie…(SPOILER ALERTS: DON’T READ AHEAD IF YOU HAVENT SEEN LOTF)

….

In the Legends of the fall movie, during the scene where he comes back to find that his lover has married his brother, and he meets her picking flowers in the garden, with her dark flowing hair…..I thought about the fact that while the actress looked great in that scene, I was happy that BRAD FOUND THE REAL DARK-HAIRED BEAUTY IN HIS REAL LIFE, MS. ANGELINA JOLIE, and that she’s TEN TIMES MORE BEAUTIFUL and adventurous and caring than any one of his love-interests in the movies!! (swoon!)…

….

I also thought about Brad’s pathetic EX during the scene when the woman who is hopelessly in-love with him comes to see him in jail after his children’s mother is accidently killed by the authorities…..the woman character cries and hugs and kisses Thristan (Brads character) through the jail bars, and says that SHE ALWAYS DREAMED OF HAVING BRAD’S CHILDREN, and that she’d even
WISHED FOR THE DEATH OF HIS BABY-MOMMA……..It made me think that Jennifer Anustain probably has wished that harm would come on Angelina, and that she could have and raise Brads SIX children…..she seems so desperate, and disturbed and clingy and self absorbed, I wouldnt put it past jen to have had her mind drift in that MORBID direction.

Charlize picked bad movies.

I don’t think it’s necessary to pit Charlize against Angelina. Let’s stop the comparison. Both are beautiful, talented and good people.

da truth truth prevails @ 10/11/2009 at 8:13 pm

Out of here, had my fun with the defenders of Marley’s co-star.

There is NO comparison possible between a great actress of wonderous and enormous ability and versatility like Angelina who takes chances in a range of roles as do all actors with true talent, and a mediocre celeb with a modicum of comedic ability like Jen who has squandered what little talent she has and settled for the most tedious of repetitive roles in poorly written and executed films which she is financing.

Hope Charlize finds some good roles. She like Angelina has great acting chops, but unlike Angelina she seems to be wandering in the wilderness in poor films these days like HalleB. And that is a shame.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/11/2009 at 8:14 pm

substract Will international power of the equation and you have 50 % of Charlize 10 latest movies that didn’t even hit $400,000 domestically !
.
One movie out of 2 doesn’t make half a million for Charlizein nothern America, at this point of her career, not when she wasn’t known but now, where she is supposed to be at the pineacle of her career at 34.
.
And it’s not even hard subject, drama type of movies. Only explanation : she hasn’t it ! Cameron Diaz has it, Chalize doesn’t have it. never had and never will.

Hens are always pitting AJ aganist any actress in Hollywood. AJ is the gold standard but there is no need to find a rivalry with every actress breathing against Angelina Jolie. We know Baby Jane can’t compete, but geez enough with the competition Bull crap.

# 95 gupta @ 10/11/2009 at 7:54 pm Reese Witherspoon ranked number one on The Hollywood Reporter’s annual list of the highest-paid actresses. The 31-year-old actress commands $15 million to $20 million a movie.
Angelina Jolie came in second, and Cameron Diaz came in third with a $15 million-per-movie requirement.
While Angelina and Reese are now asking for $15 million-$20 million per movie, they frequently agree to “no-quote deals” — deals in which the studios actually pay them far less than their usual fee (usually when they take on supporting roles).

Here’s The Hollywood Reporter’s top ten list:
1. Reese Witherspoon — $15 million-$20 million
2. Angelina Jolie — $15 million-$20 million
3. Cameron Diaz — $15+ million
4. Nicole Kidman — $10 million-$15 million
5. Renee Zellweger — $10 million-$15 million
6. Sandra Bullock — $10 million-$15 million
7. Julia Roberts — $10 million-$15 million
8. Drew Barrymore — $10 million-$12 million
9. Jodie Foster — $10 million-$12 million
10. Halle Berry — $10 million
Stars climbing up the pay scale include Katherine Heigl, Rachel McAdams and Jennifer Garner.

Note, Aniston’s name is NO where on the list

———————————–
Angelina is worth every damn penny too! I must also add that Jodie Foster was robbed big time, she’s a good actress not being paid enough.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/11/2009 at 8:21 pm

IMO @ 10/11/2009 at 8:11 pm Charlize picked bad movies

————————————–
Jennifer Aniston’s movies are even wosrt and yet she does better.
.
Jennifer Aniston is ugly to the fault but her ugliness bears more charisma to the screen than stunning Charlize who for some reason can’t attract people to the theater and mobilie crowd around her.
.
You have it or you don’t. She hasn’t it.

AJ would be great for this movie.

Both are great actors @ 10/11/2009 at 8:22 pm

I like both these actors, both are superlative actors and truly beautiful women. Actors drop out of roles all the time, this happens constantly for a number of reasons. If Angelina does this film I will definitely see it as I would if Charlize were to do it.

Do think Charlize needs a hit film soon, she has been in small films lately, and in the film business today, the almighty box office $$$ is supreme.

Angie rules @ 10/11/2009 at 8:23 pm

Charlize is not fit to lick Angie’s boots. She’s a mediocre actress at best and her career is heading down the tubes…bye ..bye

Both are great actors @ 10/11/2009 at 8:27 pm

@Not impressed by JA:

Comedies/rom coms usually do fairly well box office wise. Charlize has picked some really dark roles for the last few years and people are already depressed enough so they do not support her films. Sad but true. I would like to see Charlize in more of a comedy type role for once.

lovin some Angelina @ 10/11/2009 at 8:30 pm

jj get over your stupidity pal.
Do you just not understand that so many millions of people want Angelina. Something about this woman drives me nuts. Sexiness just oozes from this woman. I’d so turn gay for Angelina.

@Not impressed by JA: Which one of those movies was her boyfriend’s movie? He produced a movie that Charlize starred in and did some promo for but I never knew the title. I imagine it did nothing at the box office. Anyway, I just might go to netflix and order a couple of those bombs just to check them out. The only movie I remember seeing with Charlize (besides “Monster”) was one she did with her boyfriend where they had a daughter who was kidnapped. It started out fairly good but ended on a very weak, silly note. In other words, it was awful!!

Not impressed by JA @ 10/11/2009 at 8:36 pm

I agree but i still think she has no it because even with those types of movies, hers are worst than any other out there with other actresses.
.
‘A Mighty heart’ or ‘Changeling’ were very tough movies and did excellent compare to Charlize’s. So does Kate Winslet movies too or other actresses like Scarlett.
.
I just think that she has no it factor and didn’t capitalize enough on her Oscar at the right time. She doesn’t seem to gain popularity in the US and has zero international appeal though she is in the business for quite some time now. I mean peneloppe Cruz who came later, who has a very noticeable accent seems to gain more popularity and seems to attract more people than her.
.
I think she is better known in Europe for the Dior perfume ad : ‘J’adore’ than her movies.
.
It’s like she has no fans. I never heard anyone going to see a movie because she was in it. Or anticipating a movie where she was supposed to be featured. Even magazines don’t put her so much on their cover though she is beautiful with that typical model type of beauty and should sell more.

lovin some Angelina @ 10/11/2009 at 8:42 pm

Simply don’t understand why non fans are piting these woman against Angelina. Just like Kate WInslet, Anne Hathaway, Madonna, Jennifer, etc. Do you really think they can intimidate Jolie? neva

I like charliez I think she is very attarctive and talented but she doesn’t attract people to go see her movies. Reece does it though her apeal is more in north america , Angie does it internationally but Charliez eventhough she is in the same age group with them and all has one oscar she mis out in the box office apeal.

SHE HASN’T SIGNED ON JJ
YOUR INFO IS WRONG AS USUAL!!!!

you are really loosing touch by quoting rumors as fact.
esp a snarky blog.

Passing Through @ 10/11/2009 at 8:45 pm

Normally I don’t quibble with the verbage of Jared’s titles for these threads, but geez, dude. The article doesn’t say Angie has signed to do the movie. It says she’s in talks to do the movie. Would it hurt to put that in the title?
.
On another note – if Angie’s in talks to do a movie that wants to shoot in early 2010, then chances are she’s not doing Wanted 2 and that Brad is not about to start shooting LCOZ.

Both are great actors @ 10/11/2009 at 8:45 pm

@Not impressed by JA:

Everything you say is true. Charlize just does not have a big fanbase at all. She is around the same age I think as Angelina and Penelope and is really an unknown to most people. She got no bounce off wining an Oscar.

Both are great actors @ 10/11/2009 at 8:51 pm

@Passing Through:

All the talk about Wanted2 has gone silent. JamesMc has 2 films he is doing, one now, and one to begin in January or February of next year.

And I read somewhere that Brad is supposed to have said that LCOZ’s screenplay is still being written.

The fact is that neither Brad nor Angelina have definitely signed up for any new role at this time. Just a lot of hot air as to possible roles.

Angelina would be good in this film if she does indeed do it. Time will tell.

95 gupta @ 10/11/2009 at 7:54 pm Reese Witherspoon ranked number one on The Hollywood Reporter’s annual list of the highest-paid actresses. The 31-year-old actress commands $15 million to $20 million a movie.
Angelina Jolie came in second, and Cameron Diaz came in third with a $15 million-per-movie requirement.
While Angelina and Reese are now asking for $15 million-$20 million per movie, they frequently agree to “no-quote deals” — deals in which the studios actually pay them far less than their usual fee (usually when they take on supporting roles).
————–

Thanks for the list .

But NIcole Kidman, Renee Z., and Halle Belle on the list ? Are you sure this is the recent list . these actress produce one bomb from another. how can they be included ???

The Bruiser @ 10/11/2009 at 7:18 pm Silly me. I forgot to post the source on the above post:

http://www.boxofficemojo.com

Boy am I dumb.
=================
The below information is taken from the same site,

Angie’s: not counting the movies she voiced in.
- 12 winners
- 7 flops
- 5 movies that have no production budgets posted

Hag’s: not counting the movie she voiced in as well.
- 8 winners
- 1 flop
- 10 movies that have no production budgets posted.

It’s easy for you to judge Angie’s work because hag’s 10 movies have no production budget listed on that site. Why don’t you try harder?

I think one of the posters hit it on the head, that is, someone manufactured the rumor that Angelina is in talks to replace Charlize Theron in order to keep investor interest in the movie.
.
It’ll come to nothing.
.
I also agree with the comment about Charlize being absolutely beautiful but somehow, that beauty not translating into a strong presence on the screen.

@LEGENDS OF THE FALL!!!:

OK I get your point but that was a bit creepy.. gave me chill bumbs and not in a good way..’

I personally think that some things are meant to be. Life happens the way it is supposed to more often then not. That being said. Things moved in a clear direction for these two people to be together. Whether you like them or not.. I really think they were meant to be together. They seem to have things in common, acting roles, people just a bit scary too..

Back to the movie. I know that most fans LOVE LOTF.. I like it but not my favorite Brad movie.. I lived him in the off beat roles more.. Kalifornia, Snatch, Seven, 12 Monkeys (saw that one today, Fight Club, M&MS (Favorite) Jesse James (some of his BEST WORK).. Babel.. Burn.. IB.. Just loved all of these.. I could hardly watch LOTF.. he was just too beautiful and it was hard to see anything else.. I think he was good.. but I perfer the other roles more..

Angie would look perfect if she’d just eat more. She needs like a reverse personal trainer, someone to make sure she doesn’t turn ugly skinny.

Angie is way much much better for this role. Charlize is a great actress but who can beat Angie. She makes both men and women horny.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/11/2009 at 9:33 pm

Truth is, Charlize is like a beautiful painting. Everyone likes it, nobody really hate it, she doesn’t bother anyone, she doesn’t really attract nor repulse. She is there, we know she is beautiful, we know she has a rep of being talented but we just don’t care and that’s the problem : everyone loves her, like everyone loves the Mona Lisa but yet few people will take the time to see her or admire her..
.
She is beautiful and talented but doesn’t trigger PASSION, INTEREST. As for her talent, people know that she has an Oscar but am pretty sure that few even knows how talented she is.
.
People just don’t care about Charlize. they don’t care enough about her beauty to just take the time to admire her, they don’t care about her talent to follow her movies….somerthing that Renee’s fans do, hence she has an impressive high number per theater when she put out there independant movies cause she has a fanbase (unlike Charlize) who are interested in her work and follow her.
.
Tt’s a pity for Charlize, but it’s the truth.

groundcontrol @ 10/11/2009 at 9:48 pm

I liked Charlize in the story about women and the union. I don’t think she is very Hollywood so I am sure that dictates her choice in films. Both Angie and Charlize are still young and have many years left in their careers and many opportunities to shine again. Even if Angie does fewer and fewer films she will still probably be interested if some great script or story comes around. Since Angie and Brad both would like to continue their charitable foundation and their other contributions like in Cambodia and generally overseas they will still willingly do the blockbuster now and then.
.
Even now we don’t see Angie working on too many film projects.

wobbler30 @ 10/11/2009 at 9:50 pm

Has brad had an affair with every woman he has worked with. I didn’t know Thandie was in interview w a vampire. He is the one who should have the rep.

dianad1968 @ 10/11/2009 at 9:55 pm

@Not impressed by JA:

#140

Charlize is beautiful but also bland, if that makes sense. And there are rumours that she is older than she says she is.

Sounds along the lines of a good bulk of her other films :/ Doesn’t she have more money then most people in the world? Clearly her, her kids, their kids and so on will never have to work ever. She should just quit and take care of all of those kids she keeps collecting.

Sam and Angie.... @ 10/11/2009 at 9:55 pm

I hope Angelina signs on as her and Sam Worthington would be fantastic together as they both have great screen presence.

He stole Terminator Salvation from Christian Bale and is the star in the upcoming James Cameron “Avatar” movie which is going to be huge. He recently finished a movie with Keira Knightley and is now currently filming another big blockbuster “Clash of the Titans”.

Sam is the new “it” star of Hollywood and pairing him with Angelina is very exciting, I would love to see them in “the Tourist”

to wobbie @ 10/11/2009 at 9:57 pm

@ wobbler

Brad is a ONE woman man. Do your research before you start barking !!!

@blah: Angie is an International star.

@wobbler30:
.
>>>>>>>>>
.
Fvuck off weeble!!

@wobbler30:

well I see the fans at jjb were right about you.. that was quick. one comment on jjb not trashing Brad.. I guess you were saving it for jj..

Brad Pitt has never been know as a player or a womanizer at all. He feel in love with Angeilnal JOLIE.. that is a fact. does that make him a bad person.. no just a HUMAN..

Angie is a very beautiful woman, and she is linked with everyone. Problem is she has not had relationships with these men. As much as the haters want to think it is true. If it were true.. so what.. just like Cameron, Drew, Kate.. she was single and could date or whatever with whom ever she wanted. She had no where near the number of relationships that Drew has had.. nor marriages.. yet she is the “loose woman”.. She is a very moral woman. And being single she can date as many men as she wants. She has been very honest in her life. She has shared EVERYTHING.. Why would her relationships with men be any different.. So I don’t care what the Freaks say..

And about Brad.. Brad has always been in a committed relationship. Never known as cheater.. and just because he feel in love does not make him a cheater. Jennifer (by her own words) told the man to go out and get Angelina out of his system.. work it out.. (meaning go and do what you needed to do with her then come back to me). Well Brad told her HE COULD NOT DO THAT and be married. What does that mean.. Well to me it means he was in love and would not break his vows. So he told Jen that he could not figure it out and still be her husband. So he left.. and the rest was up to her. she is the one who wanted the man she “loved” to go and sleep with another woman.. He is the one that was honest and DID NOT. So like him or not.. don’t make him into something he is not because you don’t like him. Brad is not a cheater.. nor a womanizer. NEVER has been. He is a ONE woman man.. and the ONE WOMAN IS Angelina.. Angie is a ONE MAN WOMAN. and that MAN is Brad..

Enough said. if you don’t like it .. then Suck it up..

Hey Oldie,
.
7:3 in your favor!!
.
heheheheh!

She would be great in it.

Joe @ 10/11/2009 at 8:45 pm
SHE HASN’T SIGNED ON JJ
YOUR INFO IS WRONG AS USUAL!!!!
you are really loosing touch by quoting rumors as fact.
esp a snarky blog.
*****************************************************************************************

Bullshit rumor never stopped Jared. Post a thread on Angie and rack up another 500 to 1000 hits. It’s all in the bottom line.
.
Jared needs to stop posting bullshit. I’m off this thread.

Sexiest Vampire EVERRRR! @ 10/11/2009 at 10:39 pm

BRAD PITT IS NUMBER ONE ON THE LIST OF TOP TEN SEXIEST VAMPIRES OF ALL TIME!!!!!!!!

http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/tv_and_radio/article6728926.ece?token=null&offset=24&page=3

Jill @ 10/11/2009 at 10:34 pm

Joe @ 10/11/2009 at 8:45 pm
SHE HASN’T SIGNED ON JJ
YOUR INFO IS WRONG AS USUAL!!!!
you are really loosing touch by quoting rumors as fact.
esp a snarky blog.
*****************************************************************************************

Bullshit rumor never stopped Jared. Post a thread on Angie and rack up another 500 to 1000 hits. It’s all in the bottom line.
.
Jared needs to stop posting bullshit. I’m off this thread.
____
Really good point.

@reply | Flag This
# 150
lylian @ 10/11/2009 at 10:20 pm

Hey Oldie,
.
7:3 in your favor!!
.
heheheheh!
================

Sorry, Lylian, it’s 8-3. Weeble showed up a few days ago, and I scored an extra point. You probably missed the posts.

jen wants 2 have Brads babys @ 10/11/2009 at 10:57 pm

LEGENDS OF THE FALL IS A GREAT MOVIE!! A MUST SEE FOR FANS!!!!…
____

I was watching the LEGENDS OF THE FALL marathon on BRAVO channel last night, and I couldn’t help but think of Brad meeting the beautiful Angelina and her being the LOVE OF HIS LIFE when I saw the movie…(SPOILER ALERTS: DON’T READ AHEAD IF YOU HAVENT SEEN LOTF)

….

In the Legends of the fall movie, during the scene where he comes back to find that his lover has married his brother, and he meets her picking flowers in the garden, with her dark flowing hair…..I thought about the fact that while the actress looked great in that scene, I was happy that BRAD FOUND THE REAL DARK-HAIRED BEAUTY IN HIS REAL LIFE, MS. ANGELINA JOLIE, and that she’s TEN TIMES MORE BEAUTIFUL and adventurous and caring than any one of his love-interests in the movies!! (swoon!)…

….

I also thought about Brad’s pathetic EX during the scene when the woman who is hopelessly in-love with him comes to see him in jail after his children’s mother is accidently killed by the authorities…..the woman character cries and hugs and kisses Thristan (Brads character) through the jail bars, and says that SHE ALWAYS DREAMED OF HAVING BRAD’S CHILDREN, and that she’d even
WISHED FOR THE DEATH OF HIS BABY-MOMMA……..It made me think that Jennifer Anustain probably has wished that harm would come on Angelina, and that she could have and raise Brads SIX children…..she seems so desperate, and disturbed and clingy and self absorbed, I wouldnt put it past jen to have had her mind drift in that MORBID direction.

what jens friends wont tell r @ 10/11/2009 at 11:03 pm

Google video, ‘what jens friends won’t tell her’….

what jens friends wont tell r @ 10/11/2009 at 11:07 pm

OH SNAP!!!!! BURN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!…….LOL!!!!!!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/markkermode/2009/10/what_jennifer_anistons_best_fr.html

I just read the comments at the Newsweek site again. Wow, some awesome posts by the JP fans. I recognize some names there. I wish Brad and Angelina could read those posts, they would be so proud of their fans, just as we, fans, are proud of them. Bravo, ladies.

lulu @ 10/11/2009 at 8:57 pm 95 gupta @ 10/11/2009 at 7:54 pm Reese Witherspoon ranked number one on The Hollywood Reporter’s annual list of the highest-paid actresses. The 31-year-old actress commands $15 million to $20 million a movie.
Angelina Jolie came in second, and Cameron Diaz came in third with a $15 million-per-movie requirement.
While Angelina and Reese are now asking for $15 million-$20 million per movie, they frequently agree to “no-quote deals” — deals in which the studios actually pay them far less than their usual fee (usually when they take on supporting roles).
————–

Thanks for the list .

But NIcole Kidman, Renee Z., and Halle Belle on the list ? Are you sure this is the recent list . these actress

_________________

That is the ranking from 2007. (In 2007 Angie and Reece were ranked the same, but the article made Reece #1)

In 2008 Angie is ranked #1 – highest paid movie actress.

There are those in the media who always try to deny her, but Angie always prevail.

BTW, I have even more suspicion of the media after the David Letterman extortion attempt. If a news producer can do that, what other underhanded things are done by those in the media? To write or say whatever you want to millions of people – that is a lot of power and it is used for very selfish, or mean spirited purposes.

observer @ 10/11/2009 at 11:15 pm lulu @ 10/11/2009 at 8:57 pm 95 gupta @ 10/11/2009 at 7:54 pm Reese Witherspoon ranked number one on The Hollywood Reporter’s annual list of the highest-paid actresses. The 31-year-old actress commands $15 million to $20 million a movie.
Angelina Jolie came in second, and Cameron Diaz came in third with a $15 million-per-movie requirement.
While Angelina and Reese are now asking for $15 million-$20 million per movie, they frequently agree to “no-quote deals” — deals in which the studios actually pay them far less than their usual fee (usually when they take on supporting roles).
————–

Thanks for the list .

But NIcole Kidman, Renee Z., and Halle Belle on the list ? Are you sure this is the recent list . these actress

_________________

That is the ranking from 2007. (In 2007 Angie and Reece were ranked the same, but the article made Reece #1)

In 2008 Angie is ranked #1 – highest paid movie actress.

There are those in the media who always try to deny her, but Angie always prevail.

BTW, I have even more suspicion of the media after the David Letterman extortion attempt. If a news producer can do that, what other underhanded things are done by those in the media? To write or say whatever you want to millions of people – that is a lot of power and it is used for very selfish, or mean spirited purposes.

_________________

You can also tell it is an old article, because they list RW as being 31. She is 34, only a few months younger than Angie.

Passing Through @ 10/11/2009 at 11:28 pm

# 132 Both are great actors @ 10/11/2009 at 8:51 pm
.
McAvoy is already contractually obligated to do Wanted 2. He signed a 3-picture deal when he took the role.
.
As for whether or not Wanted 2 will shoot this year? It’s anybody’s guess. Bekmambetov said he’d LIKE to start shooting in December, but that was never a hard-and-fast date because he still didn’t know if Angie was going to sign or if she’d like the script enough to re-sign. I would think that if she had asked for a re-write before signing the folks at Uni would have bent over backwards to make it happen.
.
Re: LCOZ. Personally I think Brad is just in one of his funky facial hair phases and LCOZ is still at least a year away from shooting. Even if James Gray has finished the script – that’s just the first draft. As picky as Brad is about scripts there’s no way he won’t want some fine-tuning.

@an oldie:
.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
.
Oh darn!!! LOL.
.
8:3 it is then.

Is Charlize repped by Huvane now? Just wondering why all these pitting her up against Angelina. I have no trust when Huvane is concerned. LOL.

Dayem! These two will be hot together!

wtf is this? she’s not doing the film.

just saying @ 10/12/2009 at 12:20 am

I love both Angelina and Charlize. Charlize seems like to take on indie films while Angie likes to do blockbuster films.

I call BS on this story. Next—>

Has anybody seen Good Hair? Do you think it’s an unbiased and well researched documentary?

@Sexiest Vampire EVERRRR!:
Thanks for the link. LOL, this is what they wrote about Tom Cruise

Given his increasingly bizarre behaviour in real life, Cruise’s portrayal of the blood-sucking corrupter Lestat seems positively lamb-like. We know it’s not quite fair to let real life affect our film judgement (and Cruise is actually brilliant as Lestat) but we can’t quite see him as sexy since we saw that YouTube video of an oddly hyper Tom cackling hysterically about his spiritual enlightenment.

@citi:

Not even Mojo count Kung fu Panda as real film. She was only the voice and everybody knows Jack Black earns all the credit. Not Angie, not in a million years. Shark Tale falls in the same category.Wanted was not her mvie either, she shared billborad with two male stars, and James was the big draw. Not Angie, not in a million years. keep on dreaming; she aint worth the 10 million bucks she earns per movie. Salt will be another flop under her blet just lilke 99% of her movies.

@Shaney:
If James was the big draw, how come you don’t see him on the official poster? Angelina was the only one on it, just like the dog was on the official M&M poster.

Poor Charlize, another loss for her. I hope that she is going to get another winner role soon.

Angie is always the right choice. and Sam is HOT! I can’t wait to see them together

Charlize is pretty when made up and a good actress but she is a *****!

I thought she had these million of babies so she can take care of them and give them a stable home, attention and care.
.
What’s the point of taking Zahara from her community when she has a poor mother alive, if nannies are the ones being with her all the time, and if she doesn’t even have a place she calls “home”.
.
Angelina should have gave Zahara’s mother money to raise her own daughter.

oh my word @ 10/12/2009 at 2:17 am

On recommendation “if you want a laugh go read the jolie posts on JJ” I did so and wow, I am not disappointed! :)

Some of you are positively hilarious and the amount of time you dedicate to these posts is really amazing. Thanks for the laughs and please don’t change! I mean some of you are even known by name on other sites. You’re that fantastic at this.. love it :)

I don’t understand why they even had the twins on top of all the little ones they adopted and Shiloh.
.
What’s the point to have so many young children if you are so career driven.
.
You want to focus on getting more movies- cool, but why adopt so many children and have 3 biological ones within 4 years?
.
Those kids are being raised in a luxurious flying orphanage.
They have food and hotel rooms, but no school, friends or sense of their parents.

dianad1968 @ 10/12/2009 at 2:30 am

@Yep:

#178

STOP REPLYING TO YOURSELF, you are not fooling ANYONE. God, you people are certifiable.

I have to say, Charlize Theron & Angelina Jolie are both very beautiful, and they are both great actresses.

i think it’s the attitude that makes you sexy,this is why Charlize even though she is imensely beautiful doesn’t draw that much attention on her as Angelina does,it’s just because she is too sweet,while Angi is like..wild,they have different personalities

dianad1968 @ 10/12/2009 at 3:40 am

@ummahyk:

#181,

Charlize is beautiful and BORING. She’s a beautiful blond, who always dresses fashionably, but that’s it. She has no sex appeal whatsoever. It has nothing to do with her being sweet and Angie being wild. What you call wild, is what others call personality and sexuality. Angie’s sexiness rolls off of her.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/12/2009 at 4:32 am

dianad1968 @ 10/12/2009 at 3:40 am @ummahyk:

#181,

Charlize is beautiful and BORING. She’s a beautiful blond, who always dresses fashionably, but that’s it. She has no sex appeal whatsoever. It has nothing to do with her being sweet and Angie being wild. What you call wild, is what others call personality and sexuality. Angie’s sexiness rolls off of her.

————————————–
ITA !!!
.
Cameron Diaz has more sexiness or/and personality in her than Charlize. And it’s not a wild/sweet thing.
.
Kate Winslet, Peneloppe Cruz, Scarlett Johansson have all more (swreen) personality than her. Are they wild ? I don’t think so. Besides Jolie WAS wild, she isn’t anymore for a couple of years now and she is at the top of her game while being NOT wild like she used to be.
.
If being wild was the it, Lindsay Lohan will be a top earner.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/12/2009 at 4:51 am

People should just accept that Charlize’s public interest has ALWAYS been low and that she was never IT at any point of her 15 years career..
.
She is transparent in the media, transparent in Hollywood, transparent in the public eye . It’s like she didn’t put her footsprints like most beautiful actresses her age with 10+ years in Hollywood and a string of good movies with some reputable male co stars (Johnny Depp, De Niro, ect…).
.
She hasn’t left a single memorable performance or popular one in the collective hollywoodian memory, even with her Oscar movie. Something that even Catherine Zeta Jones has managed to do in a time span of 5 years when she was it.
.
Again, it is a shame but it’s reality. She just hasn’t IT, she doesn’t have charisma, hence a very poor popular index. Reece has it and she is sweet.
.
If she had stayed a model, she would be among those who does well but yet don’t have it to be SUEPRmodel unlike Jolie or even Cameron Diaz though technically less beautiful. She has no screen nor stage presence whatsoever and she can’t do anything about it.
.
Even her personal history with her mother shooting down her father didn’t trigger interests like it would have done for other actresses. That tells a lot about the public interest towards her. Just look at any blog, any fansite about her : they are poor. People like her, they just are NO fans. They don’t go to that stage of love/hate with her. Again, it’s a pity but yet the truth.

Jen the Hag @ 10/12/2009 at 4:52 am

oh my word @ 10/12/2009 at 2:17 am On recommendation “if you want a laugh go read the jolie posts on JJ” I did so and wow, I am not disappointed! :)

Some of you are positively hilarious and the amount of time you dedicate to these posts is really amazing. Thanks for the laughs and please don’t change! I mean some of you are even known by name on other sites. You’re that fantastic at this.. love it :)
========
Let me guess another JENRETARD like you recommended this site. WHy not visit FemaleFirst there are lots of deranged fans like you who posts on that site. Go on go over there it willbe more on your taste stop wasting your time here in JJ. And btw i hope we made your life more bearable coz i know you hags have been praying non-stop for 5 years for B&A break up .. bwahahahhahahhah !!

Jen the Hag @ 10/12/2009 at 5:08 am

Yep @ 10/12/2009 at 2:20 am

take your meds and mind your own kids ..oh never mind HAG like you don’t have one!

Awesome! Angelina will be great!

manlesston jr @ 10/12/2009 at 6:47 am

@mslewis: you are so right! thought she was going to be with her children?

love Angelina @ 10/12/2009 at 6:53 am

What is wrong with Brad watching his his children when Angie works during the day?
I just don’t understand if your angry that Angelina was asked and not Jen but again this is thier lives and not yours. She could be a stay at home loafer like so many other mothers neglecting thier kids playing on the internet bashing people she doesn’t know. Women would kill to have her work schedule including me.

remember da truth @ 10/12/2009 at 7:14 am

You people are still illiterate, I see……

Stop accusing Jared of posting “rumors”. He said that Angie is “in talks” and that doesn’t mean that it will happen. It’s also not a rumor that she has taken over the role. It’s merely saying that someone asked her and she has responded, and we don’t know what the response was. That’s what “in talks” means. A conversation. Nothing more, nothing less.

The people attached to a movie change all the time. It’s not pitting one person against another. Sheesh. Too much reality tv for some of the little brains on here.

Why Charlize dropping out? Could be a hundred reasons. Maybe she didn’t like the script, has a scheduling conflict, didn’t like the director, is having a baby and can’t do action, didn’t want to work with Worthington, whoever he is (really, Terminator 4 is a recommendation? Who cares?), or thought it too similar to many recent movies.
Actors and actresses read many scripts at once and they take years to get to the point of being made, if ever. She might have been attached to several at once.

And please get over the box office crap. Just because it’s not “No Plot Action Movie Sequel 17″ doesn’t mean the movie doesn’t have merit. Charlize is well respected in Hollywood. She stays out of tabloids and gives few interviews, so you simpletons think she’s nobody. Go back to watching Jon and Kate Plus 8. More your speed.

love Angelina @ 10/12/2009 at 7:22 am

Angelina has been home for months now and all you hens do is complain. You nuts just love to complain and be bitter but Angelina and Brad aren’t going to seperate.

@mslewis: I agree however, Angelina has had several box office disasters after her “G.I.” Oscar win. And although she has been nominated, she hasn’t even come close to a win since. The movies she was nominated for were barley profitable by industry standards. “The Changeling” was carried by Eastwood as far as the academy was concerned, not her below average performance. What will deters Angie’s career now is her personal life overshadows her talent in the public eye. It’s become increasingly difficult for the audience to relate to any character she plays because they only see “Angelina Jolie”. Disastrous to any serious actor . Aside form that I believe her pers and the public for that matter have grown tired of her face, life and below par performances that she gets unjust attention for.

veingelina Jolie @ 10/12/2009 at 7:28 am

@love Angelina: You’re a freak multi name using loon. Out of the last dozen post your are more than half. Proof in the number darling you’re a pathetic loon. Most of the public do not like Angie or her boyfriend however that doesn’t mean they prefer Jennifer Aniston either? Now clean up your mess.

Wow both ladies look AMAZING in the pics. I’d be gay for a day with these two OMG!

Liverwurst @ 10/12/2009 at 7:38 am

Angie wouldn’t play this part on the fact that Sam Worthington is a nobody, and a sexless nobody at that. Not cute enough and he can’t act, but then again her 2nd husband wasn’t very attractive, but of course he was the shet of the day in hollywood cause billy bob can act. Now she’s with billy goat who used to be attactive , but never could act his way out of a paper bag. LOL!

remember da truth @ 10/12/2009 at 7:44 am

As much as Johnny Depp is admired for his acting ability and removing himself from establishment Hollywood, remember that at the age that Charlize Theron and Angie are now, he was sitting on a string of indie movies and small roles that made little or no money. He came back in a big way with the Pirates movies, but other than Tim Burton, he was not the go-to guy for any big directors. It’s not all about box office.

Charlize doesn’t have the same presence, but her movie choices have not helped her. She usually is the best thing in a poor movie. The difference is that Depp chose well-made movies that no one saw. Charlize chooses movies that hoped for bigger audiences and flopped. But she herself was good in them.

I don’t think that Charlize cares that much about Hollywood. She avoids the usual trappings, and her partner is the same. She doesn’t care if he is a big star, and they enjoy their lives, and keep it private. I think she is more about finding a project that interests her every once in a while, than about building a big, memorable career.

LMAO at #18 and #22′s comments, pretty funny !

both Angie and Charlize are gorgeous. But i hope the rumour is true because i’d love to see more movies of Angelina. She’s beautiful in and out.

It would be awesome if Angie signs for it.

Angelina Jolie may become an accidental ‘Tourist’
Charlize Theron and the director are reportedly out of the European thriller

The game of musical chairs on the thriller “The Tourist” is continuing with Charlize Theron exiting the Spyglass-produced feature.

While Theron has been attached to “The Tourist,” a remake of the French film “Anthony Zimmer,” for some time, she may be replaced by another Oscar winner.

According to The Hollywood Reporter, Angelina Jolie is in talks to take the female lead in the film.

But Theron’s departure is hardly the only change on “The Tourist.” direct Bharat Nalluri (“Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day”) is no longer attached, the trade paper says.

As for the male lead in the drama, which centers on an American tourist who gets enlisted by Interpol to entrap a former flame, well that’s also been in flux. Tom Cruise was, as the trades say, “loosely attached,” but he was replaced by Sam Worthington.

For now, Jolie’s involvement is still rumor-only, with the “Changeling” star already transitioning off of an action-thriller in “Salt.” Even if Jolie does sign on and “The Tourist” secures a new director, it will still be a rush to get production going by early 2010, as had tentatively been the plan.

http://www.hitfix.com/articles/2009-10-12-angelina-jolie-may-become-an-accidental-tourist

Angie ‘s going back to work sure killing the faniston trolls.

Angie just prove it again , you can have it all!
Highly successful career , motherhood, cute little offspring and a loving supportive partner , she have it all !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Go Angie!

The script look awesome, hope Angie sign for it.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/12/2009 at 8:25 am

Liverwurst @ 10/12/2009 at 7:38 am Angie wouldn’t play this part on the fact that Sam Worthington is a nobody, and a sexless nobody at that.
————————————
Uum sorry to burst your bubble, Jolie is no Maniston.
.
Mc Avoy is a great actor but kinda nobody too and it didn’t disturb Jolie to do a movie with him.
.
Again Jolie is NO conceiceted a la MANISTON.
.
Oh and by the way, Sam Worthiston is the next IT. he was acclaimed in Terminator 4 and has 5 movies in post production, one of it done by James Cameron himself. By the time he will star in THIS movie, everyone will know that the rumors were roght : he is the new IT guy.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/12/2009 at 8:32 am

As for the sexless comment…lol, coming from a Maniston fan who wosrhipped sexfull and urinefull Mayer.
.
Yeah right, Sam is a hot peaice of man and is about to blow ! Again, he is said to be the next big thing.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/12/2009 at 8:52 am

I don’t think that Charlize cares that much about Hollywood. She avoids the usual trappings, and her partner is the same. She doesn’t care if he is a big star, and they enjoy their lives, and keep it private. I think she is more about finding a project that interests her every once in a while, than about building a big, memorable career.

———————————————–
Well it goes both ways. First she doesn’t keep things more private than any other. She just doesn’t interest the tabs enough to follow her, so she isn’t bother. You don’t decide, they do. They do the same with Megan Fox on her daily routine, so she doesn’t do anything for it.
.
Second, projects, whatever they are, are also businesses that need to make money. At some point you need to have some that are bankable in order to keep receiving good projects, independant or not. And again, there are bombs and bombs. Those of Charlize are of epic proportion even within the independant genre, so again why would a businesman hire her instead of another one who would draw 10 times more ?.
.
Third, the fact that she did ‘Hancock’ is the proof that like any other artists at some point she has to build a longevity on popular index in order to keep receiving other projects. The same goes to Johnny Depp and the ‘Pirates. Charlize is already rumored to have accepted to star in the second ‘Hancock’, hardly an independant, serious project…maybe a changing of strategy in order to gain more bankable credebility, a criterion that is ALWAYS taken into account bby those who finance movies, even independant ones.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/12/2009 at 9:05 am

la sigh. @ 10/12/2009 at 7:23 am @mslewis: I agree however, Angelina has had several box office disasters after her “G.I.” Oscar win

————————————-
Again, she had bombs like anyone but rarelly in the same proportions as Charlize.
.
And again, in the present time where they are both in an age where they should be at the pinneacle of their career, financial wise included, Charlize doesn’t seems to RISE above the typical figures of an unkown starlet in her first movie, even taking the ‘independant’ project.
.
Again, if 4 out of your last 5 movies (exception of Hancock) are making less than $400,000 domestically, even for an independant one, you have to ask yourself the right questions. This is a consistent mega implosion of unbeleivable proportions.
.
Where are Charlize fans ? Her fans alone should guarantee each independant movie to reach $2M at least !
.
You can look at it at every angle, no actress of this stature in this type of movies has had bombs of epic proportions like Charlize had. It’s like she is transparent and doesn’t even exist.
.
Again a shame cause she is beautiful and talented BUT with no real fanbase who will follow her and her work.

It would have been real nice to see Charlize in this movie.. Shes a great actress.. Would have been a great action star.. She is beautiful and a beautiful body.. I’ve really missed her in the movies. .A real big fan of hers..

Don’t worry whiny hen. Charlize is doing a sequel to the dreadful Hanco*ck with Will Smith. That should satisfy your whiny heart until Lard face latest lame rom com crapfest is inflicted on the public. Happy Monday

I love Charlene and Angie. I think they are both fascinating, beautiful and talented women. Both have interesting stories to tell and I don’t like the idea of people treating Charlene like she was some sort of threat to Angie. In fact I would like to see a serious film made with both of them working together (add Monica Bellucci and oh my….). Just my two cents.

Sorry, meant to say ‘Charlize’.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/12/2009 at 10:30 am

bdj @ 10/12/2009 at 9:41 am Don’t worry whiny hen. Charlize is doing a sequel to the dreadful Hanco*ck with Will Smith. That should satisfy your whiny heart until Lard face latest lame rom com crapfest is inflicted on the public. Happy Monday

———————————–
That’s so true ! FACTS are there for all to see.
.
Where were the new Charlize fans for her latest flick, where were they ?
.
“Burning Plain” has been out for three weeks already and has a domestic figures at $157,532 only.
.
Again where were her fans, where were the ones who whine about not seeing her when they can’t even bring their a** on her latest movie and probably didn’t even know the title of her latest flick ar that she had a movie coming out ?
.
And don’t come with the excuse of the number of theater to explain that pooor results. Like i said, Renee’s latest flick was released in 4 theater (Charlize in 21). Renee managed to pass $160,000 within the first 5 days with 7 times less theaterS and is now en route to reach 2,5 M on the back of her fans.
.
Again, proof that Chralize has only whiners who whine that she isn’t cast in movies but can’t bring their butt to see her work contributing to the perception that she is a no drawer when it comes to bring people to the theater.

The bottom line is he jenhens always take the side of whoever is not Brad or Angelina. LOL at Ellie being a fan of Charlize now. How many of her films did you see, Ellie? As it was pointed out above, not too many Charlize fans showed up to see her movies. Maybe her film will see a bump in the bo # this weekend after this dicussion? LOL.

regardless if Charlize is a box office draw or not. i would rather look at her than filler face. she is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay prettier and she is more natural than MANiston. charlize is easy on the eyes unlike MANiston. her face is too damn ugly especially the long chin.

@Not impressed by JA:
I don’t think this is coming from Charlize fans, I think this is mostly Angie haters. Charlize is a beautiful woman, with A-list name recongnition, but no real fan base. At least not one that is willing to come out guns blazing (or to buy tickets to the Burning Plain) to defend her honor.
-
This project would appeal to Angie because it will mean filming in Europe. My guess is that she is going to start to prefer projects that are closer to her home base.

jealus of shilo dina # 1 @ 10/12/2009 at 11:14 am

jjb dorothy street is jjj’s dina # 1 lier lier pants on fire !! dorothy street is jealous dat ppl r interrested in shiloe , vivane , knot . She is drunk , if she did not kno pple won’t too see the bio kids !! anglina said brad had too love adotped kids as he wood love bio !! you think anglina wood take it if brad di’d n’t love his bio like adotped !! angie carry littel kids in her belly , they there blood . brad caerfull and lovin his kids in anglina belly !! zahharra luves shiloe , vivane , dorothy is hung up on race !!
#######################################################

@hmm:

Angie, unlike yourself, is self-actualized. Being good at one thing does not preclude her from exceling in many other things.

Angie is SMART, BRAVE, PHILANTHROPIC, TALENTED, HUMBLE, ORGANIZED AND FAMILY CENTRED; IN ADDITION TO BEING THE MOST FAMOUS FEMALE CELEBRITY IN THE WORLD.

She doesn’t spend her free time working with hair stylists, yoga instructors and female enablers.

She ‘acts’ because she is great at it and enjoys being part of a fun or meaningful movie.

She is avidly interested in world affairs as it affects the disenfranchised; ‘ particularly children and refugee families. As a UNHCR amassador she travels extensively.

She flies her own plane. She rides motorcycles and four wheelers

She has dreams to fly across the Sahara Desert.

She is a voracious reader and is well informed as she sits on the Council of Foreign Relations.

She spends quality time with all her SIX children every day even when she is filming.

She is the desirable partner of a very self-actualized man who shares her smarts, talent, family devotion, global interests and philantthropy.

She is on the speed dial list of Queens and Presidents, but is more charmed by the paupers.

She is admired for her professionalism, beauty, sweetness and talent by her peers and directors.

Angie does not conform to HW’s perception of sexy. She dresses classically without parading the t&a like so many other women who rely on this to garner attention.

Angie, as Brad has said, has no boss……….or publicist.

Angie, for being such a mega star, does not attach her identity to such frivolousness. She lives a life of real purpose and deep convictions, none of which are centred on her stardom.

So, maybe your ‘one trick pony, no talent, insecure, middle aged t.v. star alum couldn’t chew gum and walk, but Angie can. So don’t worry about her multi-tasking. She is capable of doing it all and doing it well and that is why she is so admired. So don’t project your personal limitations on this iconic woman.

dorothy iz no shiloe fan ppl!! @ 10/12/2009 at 11:30 am

######################################################dorothe blog she dispointsde if angie gets no ethipien kid !! read batk thread jjb , dorothy repeets her tired azz , angie said ehtopien , ethopien , zahharra needs a kid too idendify with !! zahhara aint infearir too sisters dorothe !!

################################################

zahharra is imirge of bio mom
###################################

http://cm1.theinsider.com/media/0/42/5/angelina_ap_02_5.0.0.0×0.432×432.jpeg

dawne
=================================
Great, Great response, everything you said is right to the point!
Oh and I gave that freak of nature Allison -from Newsweek a piece of my mind. Heck I gave her a couple of things I had in my mind. That biche must be a jentard freak or something. You know what, I think I will go overthere and tell her a couple of more things. WTF!

@ellie’:
You are a real big fan of Charlize? Hahahaha. You are a big fat liar, as usual. Hey, now that the bo # are out, and Vince movie made $35M the first weekend while Maniston’s made $8M, whose movie do you say TBU was? And I bet you if the cute puppy that was on the MarleyandMe poster did another movie coming out the same day as a movie by Maniston, the puppy’s flick would win the bo numbers too.

the real lou @ 10/12/2009 at 11:33 am

I see the haters are coming out of the “woodwork” pretending to be Charlize Theron fans,LOL.Funny thing is…. they pulled the SAME crap when Brad pulled out of State of Play.Remember the Russell Crowe fans claiming State of Play would be a BIGGER hit without Brad in it?What happen to these “so-called” Charlize Theron fans when her latest movies have been flopping all over town?If NOT for Hanc*ock the woman would NOT have had a hit since The Italian Job.BTW I have NOTHING against Miss Theron.I just have a problem with haters taking ANY and EVERY opportunity to hate on Angelina.You people really need to get a damn life.Seriously!

Not impressed by JA @ 10/12/2009 at 11:41 am

Cherylr @ 10/12/2009 at 11:11 am @Not impressed by JA:
I don’t think this is coming from Charlize fans, I think this is mostly Angie haters. Charlize is a beautiful woman, with A-list name recongnition, but no real fan base. At least not one that is willing to come out guns blazing (or to buy tickets to the Burning Plain) to defend her honor.
-
This project would appeal to Angie because it will mean filming in Europe. My guess is that she is going to start to prefer projects that are closer to her home base.

—————–

I know Cherylr. That was sarcasm when i said they are whiners…which is Maniston fans signature.
.
I beleive that Charlize has fans but a very tiny fan base. Not to say that she isn’t love, she is extremely loved and that’s the problem, she is loved overall but not at a fanatic level which is paramount when you put out there independant movies that only a very LOYAL fanbase can follow and support while mainstream movies are follow by fans and more amateurs of the genre..

Not impressed by JA @ 10/12/2009 at 8:25 am

I agree. how about the guy from AMH. he wasn’t a hottie and a nobody.

the real lou @ 10/12/2009 at 11:44 am

Angelina Jolie Replaces Charlize Theron as ‘Tourist’…..Why is Jared stating this as fact?The article says Angelina is in “talks” it’s NOT a done deal.They haven’t even hired a director as of yet.I will wait and see how this pans out.Unlike the haters/trolls I will NOT be jumping conclusions.

off the topic. on people.com. they refer brad as the american idol now and Paul Newman was then. i thought that was nice since some of the JP fans refer to JP’s relationship as the Newmans of their generation.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/12/2009 at 11:53 am

Dwane,
.
Great post as usual.
.
Those Maniston fans are just like her : lazy losers who can’t perform well in more than one thing, let alone succeed in their single activity. they can’t even blog like professional.
.
They are AMATEURS and LOSERS in life !

AMERICAN IDOL: NOW

The world’s love affair with Brad Pitt began more than two decades ago with his tantalizing shirtless romp in 1991′s Thelma & Louise.Since then he’s continued to melt hearts – as much for his movies (Legends of the Fall to Troy) as for his off-screen role as doting family man to a brood of six and his global goodwill efforts with partner Angelina Jolie.

http://www.people.com/people/package/gallery/0,,20301963_20308815,00.html#20674751

the real lou @ 10/12/2009 at 11:58 am

# 225 pokeman @ 10/12/2009 at 11:45 am …..I saw that this morning.Funny thing is…my Mother-in-Law made the the same comparison after Paul Newman passed away.I also feel Angelina and Brad are the modern day Joanne Woodward and Paul Newman.

AMERICAN IDOL: THEN

Late screen legend Paul Newman (who died in 2009 at age 83) mesmerized audiences with his piercing blue eyes, but the icon will be remembered for being much more than just a pretty face: He was a philanthropist, a beloved friend and family man whose proudest achievement was his 50-year marriage to actress Joanne Woodward.

2009 Hollywood Reporter list Angie #1, Julia#2, Reese #3 . Angie is the highest paid actress in Hollywood

Charlize steps out of ‘Tourist’ role, and Angelina could be making the trip instead
By Steven Zeitchik

Charlize Theron has opted out of the Spyglass-produced thriller “The Tourist,” to which she has long been attached, and in talks to replace her is one Angelina Jolie, sources say.

The tomb-raiding one, fresh off an action-heavy part in “Salt,” would take on the one-part seductress, one-part action role of the title.

The project is now also seeking a director, as Bharat Nalluri, the “Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day” helmer who had been attached to direct, is as of last week off the project, with producers now seeking a new helmer to pair with Jolie. Neither Spyglass nor the director or actresses’ reps could immediately be reached for comment.

Production has at least until this point been tentatively set for early 2010, which could prompt producers to act quickly on a director.

A remake of the French thriller “Anthony Zimmer” from 2005, “Tourist” centers on an American tourist who, on behalf of Interpol, goes undercover to entrap a former lover who’s a suspected global criminal. It follows in the long tradition of innocents caught up in shady activities abroad that dates back to Hitchcock (“The Man Who Knew Too Much”), Polanski (“Frantic”) and beyond, and a theme that also has contemporary echoes with “Taken” this past year.

It’s not the first time there’s been movement on “Tourist.” Tom Cruise had been loosely attached at an earlier point for the lead male role, but Sam Worthington will now play the part as he rides his
“Terminator: Salvation” and “Avatar” hot streak.

There are few A-list females who producers like for lead action roles, and with Jolie not attached to star in any imminent projects post-”Salt,” “Tourist” is seen as a perfect itinerary for her.

Good news ladies, ” The Tourist” doesn’t have a director. No comment from Angie.LOL!!

kim @ 10/12/2009 at 12:25 pm 2009 Hollywood Reporter list Angie #1, Julia#2, Reese #3 . Angie is the highest paid actress in Hollywood

_______________________

((((((WHOOOO-HOOOO!!!))))))

(((SUCK IT HATERS!!!)))

:-D

love Angelina @ 10/12/2009 at 12:55 pm

I don’t care about how much money Angelina makes, she’s such a sweetheart and a great mother. I hope Brad cherishes her as much as we do! It goes way beyond thier paychecks because they live to take care of others less fortunate as well as themselves. I can’t praise this couple anymore than I have for the last 4 1/2 years, they seem to get better every year.

It’ll be great, Love Angie.

He's not good @ 10/12/2009 at 1:17 pm

@love Angelina: Of course he doesn’t . Just look at the abuse he continues to let her take in the media for his actions.

I love how Brangelina fans and Angelina haters aka Brad PItt fans hate the idea of Angelina doing a movie with some hot dude. Yeah, will she be able to help herself especially when her man is so inattentive. She needs some TLC from a MAN.

Angelina has not Played a REAL Love interest since being with Brad Pitt probably because he has some fears. Do you blame him? I think she’s gonna shack up with the first new dude she does a serious love scene with. I for one can’t wait.

@Loves it:
LMAO Assley only in your dream. Get a life you dumbazz.

Has anyone noticed that Angie is ALWAYS in the top 5 searched for on Box office mojo? ALWAYS! A big Movie comes out and the Stars of the movie are in the top 5 people search and Angelina is ALWAYS in the mix .no matter what is going on. LOLOLOLOL

OT, I am late at this but I just got to watch that Tom Cruise Scientology video. My, oh my, Tommy Boy is one crazeee guy.

@huh: Get your face some room to breath and move a way from Pitt’s butt hole. Angelina is definitely gonna sleep with her next leading man if the movie involves a love story. “I always fall in love with my leading men.” – Angie. this is why she hasn’t done any super lovely dovely or sex romping movies. HELLO! You all know this and that’s why you are wishing, shaking, and praying to the lord that Angelina doesn’t do any movies with a love story/ hot man.

@Loves it:
I am laughing at you. You really don’t know Angie at all. Stop pretending to be an Angie fan. You are embarrassing you idiot.

@Loves it:
Angelina is not stupid. From Brad Pitt to anyone is a downgrade. Just ask Maniston.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/12/2009 at 1:52 pm

… @ 10/12/2009 at 1:31 pm Has anyone noticed that Angie is ALWAYS in the top 5 searched for on Box office mojo? ALWAYS! A big Movie comes out and the Stars of the movie are in the top 5 people search and Angelina is ALWAYS in the mix .no matter what is going on. LOLOLOLOL

——————————

I have been looking at box office mojo for the past two years and Angie is always in the top three. She has been number 1 for the past two years on a yearly basis….and the only woman in the top 5 !

Angie hasn’t even confirmed she is doing the movie and the trolls are aready losing their minds, what will they do when it’s confimed —- throw themselves under moving trucks?

Yup, azz-holes, Angie’s going to break up a union she committed to five years ago when she and Brad chose to have a very large family………devastate the man she loves and their six children for a ‘leading man’ fling.

Do you read ‘anything’ posed on her threads????? She is not JA who is DESPERATE and has nothing, ergo nothing to lose!!

Angie has waaaaaaaaaaaaay too much loyalty to her man and family to risk their happiness as a family for a quick jump. GMAFB.

Again, you have her confused with Miss Lonely Nippleston who would jump the janitor on the shoot if it would get her another tabloid cover!

To: Loves it – you are being so silly with your comments about Angie. You are not a fan of Angie. Angie is with Brad and she is not doing anything else with her co-stars. Unlike your idol Maniston, she has been sleeping with her co-stars…Vince Vaugh, Gerald Butler, etc. I think you got it mixed up. I understand you don’t like Angie but your comments are so fake and ignorance.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/12/2009 at 2:03 pm

Trolls are sh*tting in their pants because for the past 5 years All iof Angie’s movies have been consistently either artistically acclaimed with a string of awards nominations attached to them or financial blockbusters.
.
She is at the top of her game and she doesn’t even capitalise on her top position by putting out there movies after movies like some actresses who fear to disappear in the limbs of the has been by running after their youth and undeserved lucky star.
.
That’s the sign of great actresses. Reese is the same league. She takes her time and has that balance, so are Kate Winslet and Cate Blanchett. All successful working mothers.
.
Reese, Kate and Angie are all about the same age and are multitasking successful ladies, not losers who can’t do their job properly while raising children and taking care of their man all at the same time.
.
They are modern women in par with their time not juvenile r*tarded teens in a 30 years old who whine cause they can’t manage to have a professional life while putting the same effort at leading a decent and successful private life with or without children around.

Oh, that would be so cool. I hope that’s true.

love Angelina @ 10/12/2009 at 2:05 pm

@loves it,
When did Angelina say that? Please give me a date. I’m sorry to say she’s no longer available and in a very happy place right now with a very lovely family. You can dream all you want of Angelina leaving Brad but in reality she’s with Brad and not going anywhere.

The haters are just mad because Maniston is never consider for a role that has anything to do with drama, action, thriller…except Maniston gets to play Rachel and Rachel and Rachel and Rachel…get my drift….maniston is very limited in her acting skills. I am sorry but your idol is just Rachel Green on every silly rom-com she plays. Quess what, she can’t continue to do this type of movie much longer because no one wants to see an aging TV girl doing the same movie while you can get Friends reruns.

# 217 dawne @ 10/12/2009 at 11:25 am @hmm:

Angie, unlike yourself, is self-actualized. Being good at one thing does not preclude her from exceling in many other things.

Angie is SMART, BRAVE, PHILANTHROPIC, TALENTED, HUMBLE, ORGANIZED AND FAMILY CENTRED; IN ADDITION TO BEING THE MOST FAMOUS FEMALE CELEBRITY IN THE WORLD.

She doesn’t spend her free time working with hair stylists, yoga instructors and female enablers.

She ‘acts’ because she is great at it and enjoys being part of a fun or meaningful movie.

She is avidly interested in world affairs as it affects the disenfranchised; ‘ particularly children and refugee families. As a UNHCR amassador she travels extensively.

She flies her own plane. She rides motorcycles and four wheelers

She has dreams to fly across the Sahara Desert.

She is a voracious reader and is well informed as she sits on the Council of Foreign Relations.

She spends quality time with all her SIX children every day even when she is filming.

She is the desirable partner of a very self-actualized man who shares her smarts, talent, family devotion, global interests and philantthropy.

She is on the speed dial list of Queens and Presidents, but is more charmed by the paupers.

She is admired for her professionalism, beauty, sweetness and talent by her peers and directors.

Angie does not conform to HW’s perception of sexy. She dresses classically without parading the t&a like so many other women who rely on this to garner attention.

Angie, as Brad has said, has no boss……….or publicist.

Angie, for being such a mega star, does not attach her identity to such frivolousness. She lives a life of real purpose and deep convictions, none of which are centred on her stardom.

So, maybe your ‘one trick pony, no talent, insecure, middle aged t.v. star alum couldn’t chew gum and walk, but Angie can. So don’t worry about her multi-tasking. She is capable of doing it all and doing it well and that is why she is so admired. So don’t project your personal limitations on this iconic woman.

====================

Dawne, great post. One of the best i’ve read today.

love Angelina @ 10/12/2009 at 2:10 pm

I’d advise loves it to sit herself back down on her pee stained chair because it isn’t going to happen now or never. Do you loones really believe Brad will stoop low enough to be with that shallow piece of sh** Jen? Really? I have no doubt what so ever she’d hurt one of his biological children out of jealousy.

Credit bdj, from JJB
BDJ commentary: With all the ole plant, bait and deny noise Huvane did for **** Happens launched overseas, you would expect it to do better. When “Fame” beats you, you need to go back to TV. Preferably the Oxygen Network. I guess the fat whiny hens at female First were too busy stalking Mama Angie and could not be bothered.

http://splendorcinema.blo…e-9-11-oct-up-we-go.html

Every weekend, a new 3D milestone is established. Pixar obliterated any possible competition with the release of UP, taking more than the rest of the Top 10 put together. Of the nearly £6.5 million, £4.1 million was in 3D. Cinemas across the country were rushing to fit 3D equipment in advance of the release, for a total of 260 different cinemas. New entry ZOMBIELAND landed in number 3, with Ricky Gervais hanging on for dear life at the runner up place. Here’s the numbers:

1-UP (£6,411,836)
2-THE INVENTION OF LYING (£1,038,758)
3-ZOMBIELAND (£945,256)
4-FAME (£906,877)
5-LOVE HAPPENS (£558,361)
6-HALLOWEEN II (£522,261)
7-CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF MEATBALLS (£352,563)
8-SURROGATES (£324,779)
9-DISTRICT 9 (£214,396)
10-500 DAYS OF SUMMER (£125,107
==================

Only #5? TopBrit aka Liverwurst, where were you? Maniston wants to know. Probably at home blogging hate on Angelina instead of at the movie theaters having orgasms watching your idol perform. Hahahaha.

@love Angelina: Well, My chair isn’t pee stained and I would bet some heavy green on Angie cheating with her next leading gentlemen IF the movie has any love story to it. THE NEXT MOVIE ANGIE DOES WHERE SHE HAS TO ACT LIKE SHE’S IN LOVE WITH HER CO-STAR IS THE END OF BRANGELINA! Heavy green.

@Loves it:
It ain’t gonna happen. Go scream at ocean as you have done it for five years. LMAO.

mamma mia @ 10/12/2009 at 2:28 pm

Every time when Brad works with beautiful women and Angie works with hot men, the haters wet their panties. Too bad, nothing goes to the haters’ way.

well @ 10/12/2009 at 1:50 pm

@Loves it:
Angelina is not stupid. From Brad Pitt to anyone is a downgrade. Just ask Maniston.

Read more: http://justjared.buzznet.com/2009/10/11/angelina-jolie-replaces-charlize-theron-as-touristangelina-jolie-charlize-theron-the-tourist/comment-page-10/#comments#ixzz0TkOLpy3W
================
Oh please! You are right about Angie. Angie will not pine over rotten D*CK ( as lainey calls it) when she’s done with Brad Pitt she’ll be DONE for good. As the saying goes there’s Plenty of Men in the sea and the chicks that think Brad is the only or best man out there are just insane and fat/desperate . Pitt is nothing special and Angie’s skinny appearance is proof of that. Angie has looked thinner and unhappier since being with Pitt. FACT! so what is so great about him? Oh that’s right, it’s his status as an A lister (even though he can’t act) … But guess what? Angie was already on the A list before she met Pitt. Angie is Hollwood Royalty without Pitt so she doesn’t need him for that. He’s done nothing for her career. His sure does seem better now though, doesn’t it? He’s not doing cheesy pieces of shiiit like TROY… his acting hasn’t improved much though. Shame he gets the good roles with his little acting talent.

Who carez aboutz Hollyvood and it’s ozther top nine paid dogz….It’s ANGIE againzt ZA VERLD AAAAA HAHAHAhaaaaa !!!

the real lou @ 10/12/2009 at 2:36 pm

# 235 He’s not good @ 10/12/2009 at 1:17 pm

# 236 Loves it @ 10/12/2009 at 1:20 pm

# 237 Loves it @ 10/12/2009 at 1:25 pm

# 241 Loves it @ 10/12/2009 at 1:34 pm

# 255 Loves it @ 10/12/2009 at 2:21 pm

************************************************************
Why does ANYONE waste time conversing with this name changing moron?Why she even bother with these ridiculous name changes is beyond me.The sheer INSANITY of her BS rants give her away every time.

@Loves it:

You are delusional. I suppose that is the reason why people like you are unable to learn? What utter nonsense!

ManLESSton, I likely @ 10/12/2009 at 2:41 pm

manlesston jr @ 10/12/2009 at 6:47 am
@mslewis: you are so right! thought she was going to be with her children?
.
===========
.
Sorry gals. This is the same stalker that has been trolling and following all my posts on the Butler thread. The idiot even agrees with herself post after post after post.
.
The funny things is, this stalker must be on these threads 24/7 because I will be away for hours sometimes a day at a time and the second I post, there she is. I am starting to feel like a star. Jill and PT, I guess I am now a member of your club because my little stalker is dancing from thread to thread looking for me. What a waste of her life.

the real lou @ 10/12/2009 at 2:41 pm

# 258 Loves it @ 10/12/2009 at 2:29 pm ….Damn,this post is even CRAZIER than her previous 5 delusional rants.(shaking head)

Assley is a psychopath. She loves making a fool of herself. She is our resident laughing stock.

as much as MANiston’s fans (only 4 Bet, Ellie, Jade & Sally) claim that they love her and elongated chin MANiston #1 fan they are no where to be found on her thread. Ellie would rather be here posting than her idol’s thread. it has been 3 hrs and no one posted on her boring thread. the last poster was a hater. poor MANiston. even her own fans don’t have much to say about her except the same boring sh!t (i.e she is beautiful, she has nice body, she looks young, blah, blah, blah)

Why all the hate on Jen, this thread has nothing to do with her. Jen is a wonderful human being and I’m sure she could give two sh*ts less about this role and about Brad and Angie. She has her own life and seems very happy. And she surely would not want all the baggage Brad has now. And Gracie we could do with out a full novel on why Angie is the best , if she is the best then why the need to explain when we should already know?! Just saying :)

the real lou @ 10/12/2009 at 2:50 pm

OK,I’m done feeding the animal.This sh*t is getting boring and LAME to say the least.Every time Angelina or Brad are connected to a new film….the haters cook up these mental ass scenarios of what will happen with potential co-stars.(eyes roll)Any REAL fan of Angelina or Brad knows these people are VERY monogamous and don’t play that sh*t.And don’t try to whip out the situation with X.Angelina did not become involved with Brad until after his divorce was filed.

the real lou @ 10/12/2009 at 2:54 pm

# 266 lmao @ 10/12/2009 at 2:50 pm….Well I hope you ask the same question regrading Angelina on the Jen thread.Just saying.BTW, 6 beautiful children and a loving partner is NOT baggage.

Here’s another comment about Jen from Ben’s article:

From “What tripe!”

I’m sorry, Ben this article is terrible! WHY do we keep giving Aniston SO MANY chances? She’s like the slow learner of the class, and everyone is like “thata girl, just keep going!” How insulting! Hasn’t she proven that she has ZERO range? And, she can’t even bother to change her voice, her looks, or her facial tics for a new role?
She plays the same dull character over and over. That’s not acting.
So, we have to give her chance after chance because we feel SORRY for her??? That’s the lamest thing I’ve ever heard. Feeling sorry for a woman who has millions upon millions of dollars and never has to work? Gee, I think I’ll save my sympathy for the people of New Orleans still living in trailers and dodgin’ bullets, thank you. Or, the poor people who are being “down-sized” and have families to support. I don’t understand WHY people sympathize with her? It’s NOT like they REALLY know her? For all you know, she could be a brat. Who knows? But, what I do know, is that she’s not that talented, she uses the media for constant pr, and she loves to see her face in the spotlight. Has she ever turned a magazine cover, or said NO to an interview? She’s ALWAYS in our face! These are NOT admirable qualities. I don’t find her a good role model and I feel sorry for those that do. And, no amount of “poor Jen” pity points can make me see one her horrible movies. Sorry, I say we stop giving this bad actress chances, turn off the pity faucet, and start giving more talented woman the roles that she’s hogging up. Sorry Jen, your turn is over, who’s NEXT? I much prefer Rachel McAdams, Kristen Bell, Anna Faris, Sandra Bullock, Zoey Deschanel, etc. And, they don’t use the poor-me, pity angle to get people to watch their movies. They have more class and talent than that.

Gracie @ 10/12/2009 at 1:52 pm Angie hasn’t even confirmed she is doing the movie and the trolls are aready losing their minds, what will they do when it’s confimed —- throw themselves under moving trucks?

_________________________________
i would prefer them to slit their throats or wrists. wouldn’ that be nice.

Here’s another comment about Jen from Ben’s article:
From “What tripe!”

I’m sorry, Ben this article is terrible! WHY do we keep giving Aniston SO MANY chances? She’s like the slow learner of the class, and everyone is like “thata girl, just keep going!” How insulting! Hasn’t she proven that she has ZERO range? And, she can’t even bother to change her voice, her looks, or her facial tics for a new role? She plays the same dull character over and over. That’s not acting. So, we have to give her chance after chance because we feel SORRY for her??? That’s the lamest thing I’ve ever heard. Feeling sorry for a woman who has millions upon millions of dollars and never has to work? Gee, I think I’ll save my sympathy for the people of New Orleans still living in trailers and dodgin’ bullets, thank you. Or, the poor people who are being “down-sized” and have families to support. I don’t understand WHY people sympathize with her? It’s NOT like they REALLY know her? For all you know, she could be a brat. Who knows? But, what I do know, is that she’s not that talented, she uses the media for constant pr, and she loves to see her face in the spotlight. Has she ever turned a magazine cover, or said NO to an interview? She’s ALWAYS in our face! These are NOT admirable qualities. I don’t find her a good role model and I feel sorry for those that do. And, no amount of “poor Jen” pity points can make me see one her horrible movies. Sorry, I say we stop giving this bad actress chances, turn off the pity faucet, and start giving more talented woman the roles that she’s hogging up. Sorry Jen, your turn is over, who’s NEXT? I much prefer Rachel McAdams, Kristen Bell, Anna Faris, Sandra Bullock, Zoey Deschanel, etc. And, they don’t use the poor-me, pity angle to get people to watch their movies. They have more class and talent than that.

thanks for the info on the tourist scottish hautness. i was wondering if the ” tourist” is one part SEDUCTION and one part ACTION , i can’t imagine anybody in this except angelina jolie. while some other stars has to try really hard to look seductive with the body scheming or almost half-naked outfit, but LA JOLIE don’t need much of anything other than let her highly expressive La face do the seduction play or they simply say , COME HITHER FACE. i think charlize wil do alright in this move but the role screams angelina jolie. i believe she is only woman today ,who can give perfect justice for this role. angelina has a seductive face plus very feminine,graceful; yet fierce,tough,athletic,aggressive,fast and agile like a cheetah . well ,i would say she is a cross between the gracefully speedy cheetah and a regal looking tiger.by the way , is this sam worthington guy, the one i seen in one cover magazine where in his interview ,he cusses 98% of the time and reminds me of female version of megan fox. yes he is hot looking but i am not sure whe open his mouth interviews. just like fox he kind of badmouth a director. i just hope he smarten up and behave like a professional to gain respects.

ManLESSton, I likely @ 10/12/2009 at 3:08 pm

@lmao: I’m glad someone believes Nippy is past it. But I don’t believe it for a second. She rolled out the crocodile tears and then spoke about it at her premiere of Sh!t Happens. She cried to Butler on the set of the Bounty because the scene had her thinking of Brad and she broke down in tears. She said it in an interview on the Red Carpet. Puleeeze.
.
Nippy lives for all things Brangelina. And don’t think for a second that she isn’t jealous as hell that these kind of parts aren’t being offered to her.
.
Now I’m LMAO at you.

@cj:
I love that post. Do you have a link? I love another blogger’s way of putting it: “We don’t owe JA a movie career”. LOL.

What is so crazy about stating FACTS! it is highly doubtful that Angelina is going to react the same way one of YOU would if her relationship with Pitty ends. The way Aniston handled her divorce is the same way any of you Brad Pitt obsessed hens would act. Cry me a river. That’s why you continue to harp on Maniston not being able to get over Pitty …because none of you would get over him. I bet she is waaaay over him by now but you continue to act like she’s still crying about it. Angelina is A list she is considered Hollywood Royalty because of her Father. Those are facts.

ManLESSton, I likely @ 10/12/2009 at 3:18 pm

I believe that Charlize is a beautiful woman. In that perfume commercial where is she walking towards the camera dropping her clothes, she is breathtaking. The problem is she doesn’t connect with the audience. Every time the commercial is on my hubby calls her the “hottest ice queen” he has ever seen. I think that is typical of her on screen also. Just beautiful but unapproachable.
.
Now Angie is a whole different story. Her appeal is she has a warmth to her that is undeniable to go with her beauty. Again depending on how the role is written, maybe Angie would be the better choice. We’ll see…

@ManLESSton, I likely: you read that in tabloids.

the real lou @ 10/12/2009 at 2:54 pm

I was goin to respond to LMAO but guess you beat me to it.

ManLESSton, I likely @ 10/12/2009 at 3:20 pm

@tabloids: Bullsh!t. It is on video at x17online.com. Go see for yourself idiot.

cj @ 10/12/2009 at 2:57 pm

Here’s another comment about Jen from Ben’s article:

From “What tripe!”

I’m sorry, Ben this article is terrible! WHY do we keep giving Aniston SO MANY chances? She’s like the slow learner of the class, and everyone is like “thata girl, just keep going!” How insulting! Hasn’t she proven that she has ZERO range? And, she can’t even bother to change her voice, her looks, or her facial tics for a new role?
She plays the same dull character over and over. That’s not acting.
So, we have to give her chance after chance because we feel SORRY for her??? That’s the lamest thing I’ve ever heard.
Feeling sorry for a woman who has millions upon millions of dollars and never has to work? Gee, I think I’ll save my sympathy for the people of New Orleans still living in trailers and dodgin’ bullets, thank you. Or, the poor people who are being “down-sized” and have families to support. I don’t understand WHY people sympathize with her? It’s NOT like they REALLY know her? For all you know, she could be a brat. Who knows? But, what I do know, is that she’s not that talented, she uses the media for constant pr, and she loves to see her face in the spotlight Has she ever turned a magazine cover, or said NO to an interview? She’s ALWAYS in our face! These are NOT admirable qualities. I don’t find her a good role model and I feel sorry for those that do. And, no amount of “poor Jen” pity points can make me see one her horrible movies. Sorry, I say we stop giving this bad actress chances, turn off the pity faucet, and start giving more talented woman the roles that she’s hogging up. Sorry Jen, your turn is over, who’s NEXT? I much prefer Rachel McAdams, Kristen Bell, Anna Faris, Sandra Bullock, Zoey Deschanel, etc. And, they don’t use the poor-me, pity angle to get people to watch their movies.They have more class and talent than that.
++++++++++++
ITA.

Um, ‘loves it,’ are you forgetting Angelina’s incredibly hot snog with James McAvoy, who’s quite scrumptious himself, and also her kisses and love scenes w/ Matt Damon also, a major hottie in my book. You act like this will be the first hot scene she’s done – hahaha, my the fanistons and haters have horrid short term memories don’t they??!!
.
Or maybe it’s just early dementia – they are all probably post-menopausal, like their idol. Heh-heh.
.
Look, Angie was working with both of these hotties on set, all day, every day WHILE she was with Brad the man, and even had tabloids trying to stir up sh*t (one of rags put her snog with McAvoy on the cover trying to infer she’d leave Brad for James…AHAHAHAHAHA!!)…
.
….the lame sensationalistic media pounced on her with questions as to their kissing technique and feelings for these leading men, trying to stir up an Angie femme fatale scandal — to which she always brought it back to her man and soulmate William Bradley Pitt, and let everyone know who ruled her world (re McAvoy, she said: I will always much more prefer rolling around on the floor with Brad than anyone else, and re Damon, had to tell Sawyer “one is my love, and one is my friend,’ since the old bitty tried to make inferences like the old jealous cat she is. Hahahaha!!)
.
Sorry, go bark up some other tree, namely the one that likes getting pizzed on, Maniston…she’s the one who bribes and begs her male co-stars to fck her for a steak dinner, photo-op, and cover story on OuttaTouch…
.
Angelina, however, is always making her soulmate for life Brad feel like a KING – in the media and press, and of course out of it, at home.
.
:)

@ManLESSton, I likely: so she said she’s not over Brad Pitt and cried about him to Gerard on x17 video? sure she did.

Deja vu Ashy troll. Just go look up your posts regarding Natalie Portman, goopy Fishstick, myboo Gerry, Diane K, the red headed girl in Benjamin Button, Cate B in Babel, James McAvoy in Wanted. 5 years later and 10 paid PR romances of Whiny, you are still whining and crying. Shiloh will be in high school, Jen on her 6th plastic surgery, 7th lame rom com box office bomb and you in a mental ward still ranting and raving on Just Jared.

@CLINIQUA: Those were not proper love scenes. She kissed James once and the love scene with Matt Damon doesn’t count because she was already pregnant or her relationship with Pitt was just getting serious. Plus, the movies were not romantic love story type of movies. You know exactly what I meant by loves scenes and love story. This Tourist sounds like there might be some love connection between the two leads. :)

No stranger to action-heavy roles, “The Tourist” should be more “Mr. and Mrs. Smith” than “Lara Croft: Tomb Raider.” Thankfully. And who wouldn’t rather see Jolie as a sexy globo-cop than Charlize Theron who, after “Aeon Flux” and “Hancock,” has yet to show herself worthy of action roles?

http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2009/10/12/angelina-jolie-replaces-charlize-theron-as-the-tourist/

the real lou @ 10/12/2009 at 3:29 pm

# 275 Loves it @ 10/12/2009 at 3:16 pm …..Facts?What facts?Your dumb ass,ignorant,delusional rants consist of…..”I bet” “I think” which equals a whole lot of NOTHING.You are projecting what YOU want to happen which amounts to a hill of beans.I done,you are far too STUPID to converse with.

ManLESSton, I likely @ 10/12/2009 at 3:31 pm

@tabloids: The interview is from the Red Carpet of Sh!t Happens and she tells that story of crying to Butler about Brad on the set of the Bounty. Go look it up fvcktard. Or does someone have to post the link for your lazy a$$. Go ahead and try and prove me wrong.

@ManLESSton, I likely: yes, you should post the link because I don’t believe you for one second. that would have been all over the place.

dianad1968 @ 10/12/2009 at 3:37 pm

@Loves it:

#255

What heavy green are you talking about? Food stamps don’t count.

I think Charlize is a better actress, at least she’s straight than the other *****!

lola @ 10/12/2009 at 3:37 pm
Jen is still in the closet. She has not come out yet. Don’t hate.

@ManLESSton, I likely: I think you may have been dreaming of Jennifer Aniston admitting that she cries over Brad Pitt. It’s time for the fans to admit that women can and have gotten over Brad Pitt.

dianad1968 @ 10/12/2009 at 3:49 pm

@tabloids:

#292

Well you need to inform Aniston that she is over Brad, because she doesnt seem to know this, judging from her many interviews referencing Brad in one way or the other.

@tabloids:
Maniston is over Brad Pitt alright, because she was never really into him. What she isn’t over is the status of being an A-Lister’s wife. It’s just that simple.

love Angelina @ 10/12/2009 at 12:55 pm I don’t care about how much money Angelina makes, she’s such a sweetheart and a great mother. I hope Brad cherishes her as much as we do! It goes way beyond thier paychecks because they live to take care of others less fortunate as well as themselves. I can’t praise this couple anymore than I have for the last 4 1/2 years, they seem to get better every year.

_____________________

Angelina is a real sweetheart. I see others are re-hashing the x again. All I want to say is this: In 2000 the x spent $1 million dollars on her wedding to Brad, while Angie spent less than $1000 on her wedding to BBT. Angie would never spend a million dollars on a wedding – she would give it to charity instead. The two weddings constrast the two women (one is very egocentric and the other (Angie) does not focus on herself but on helping others).

just saying @ 10/12/2009 at 3:56 pm

@tabloids:
It took Putrid 5 years to get over Brad and It is time for Chinnifer to get over Brad almost 5 years after the breakup. Otherwise it is just pathetic.

the real lou @ 10/12/2009 at 4:06 pm

# 292 tabloids @ 10/12/2009 at 3:41 pm ….I believe X is over Brad.It’s her fan base who has issues with “letting go” of the Golden Couple BS.This is the reason for almost 5 years of the “triangle” in the weekly rags/blogs.Cause you know they are ones buying/believing this crap every week.A very wise person once said to me…….Why do people question why certain couples break-up?All you need to do is watch how the each lives their life after the split.That is the answer.X and Brad were NOT compatible and that is the truth.Why the need for the DRAMA 5 years later is beyond me.All parties have moved on.This should be a NON issue at this point.That is why I believe people who are STILL obsessing over this split have mental issues.

hooking with brad pitt was the best thing ever happened to MANiston. she was able to hang out with the A-list movie stars and attended main events. none of the major film festival (i.e cannes, venice film fest, & etc.) invited her to their events. she was able to go to cannes because of brad. i don’t remember but did she ever attended the Oscar before she dated/married brad. i don’t think so but I could be wrong. i know she attended others such as GG and SAG because they are for movies and T.V. anyway, my point is that this talentless old hag wouldn’t as big or should i say where she is now without riding on brad’s coattails.

@the real lou: are yout talking about some of the Brange fans too? ManlLESSton for example.

@observer:
This reminds me of the interview Brad did with Jan Carl for the MaMS promo. When asked which type of women he prefers, Ginger or Mary Ann (of Gilligan’s Island), he said “Mary Ann”. People assumed he meant Mary Ann being JA. How wrong. JA may look like your “girl next door”, but in reality she is high maintenance (just ask Tate Donovan), while Angelina may look glamorous Ginger-type on the red carpet, she is actually low maintenance, a real girl-next-door. In the end Brad has it both ways with Angelina. He lives the day to day with the no fuss girl-next-door, and walks the red carpets with the most glamorous HW actress on his arm when he premieres his movies. The lucky basterd!

@pokeman:
She didn’t attend Oscar before Brad. She was merely a tv actress before Brad.

#15@blah 10/11/2009 @5:29 pm

Why would you start off by lying. Stating that the reason angie is recoginzed is because of being with Brad. Now everybody in this country that is into movies that is a lie. She did several movies before she got with Brad and also won an oscar before she got with Brad. So, just stop with the spinning. I love both Brad and Angie and having them both showing up on the Red Carpet just blows my mind, When they are there is is just like the real Hollywood.

@lmao:

Why do you all (freaks) claim that Brad has baggage.. BRAD HAS A FAMILY.. now one with a brain would consider that Baggage.

He has what he wanted.. Jen has what she wanted. And when Brad was asked if he missed his single without children days.. his answer was a BIG FAT NO.. so stop the stupid digs. Most people with children who want them do not consider them a noose around their necks. OR baggage/

and as you said.. Jen would not want the baggage (kids). I guess that is why she has not had any. And Brad found the woman that shared his desire to have a large family.. And that is why Brad and Angie do have children a family..

OH sorry.. Baggage as you call it.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/12/2009 at 4:58 pm

Jen’s baggage are her two dogs, the Coxes, her neuroticism, her desperation and her constant whining.
.
That’s jen baggage that no man would want to deal with in the long term

This is why I am convinced that Jenhens are lonely, fat, ugly women who are not able to keep a man much less produce children. How DARE you say Brad has BAGGAGE??? How dare you accuse a man who is in a relationship and has SIX lovely children with that ONE woman to have baggage? Do you know who dumb and ignorant you sound? This is why men do not want trash like you or queen of fugs. You guys are truly the poster children for dumb a@$$es.

@debra77: Brad Pitt is the one that called his family baggage when he was asked if he would do a movie with Angie. He said they would have to deal with all the baggage that came along with that. Angie says it nicer when she says no they wouldn’t do a movie together because one of them as to stay with the kids. Note she doesn’t refer to her family as baggage.

I agree, jen was a tv actress before Brad, like all Fiend´s actors.

http://pitt-news.blogspot.com/2009/10/no-meeting.html

@Loves it: Did you forgot you meds again? poor girl go take it know.How many times we have to tell you Angie comes with the package. Don’t separate them they are a couple and one .Angie is where she wants to be. If she is not you don’t decide for her. The same with Brad.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/12/2009 at 5:07 pm

val @ 10/12/2009 at 5:01 pm This is why I am convinced that Jenhens are lonely, fat, ugly women who are not able to keep a man much less produce children. How DARE you say Brad has BAGGAGE??? How dare you accuse a man who is in a relationship and has SIX lovely children with that ONE woman to have baggage? Do you know who dumb and ignorant you sound? This is why men do not want trash like you or queen of fugs. You guys are truly the poster children for dumb a@$$es.

—————————————–
The jenhens are certified child haters, peadophile apologist who were probably the baggage of their own parent.
.
They don’t know how to love and are astonished that in return men don’t want them. Maniston is a typical product of their genre. Brad dump her cause she is not a loving person.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/12/2009 at 5:07 pm
====================================
Now I know they are absolutely crazy. To refer to a man who has a family that he craved years for and is not living the life he always wanted as having baggage…well I have hear it all and then some.

I mean and is living the life he always wanted….
Sorry the trolls are annoying me ever since that biche wrote that article

I state Facts. Going the way they’re going. Brad calls his kids baggage, uses drugs when he’s supposed to be with the kids, overall a bad parent. I for one can’t wait. I will cheer her on while you guys bash her for not wanting your washed up old fartttttt. You are all stuck in the 90s when Brad Pitt was arguably good looking. now when you tell people, “eww he’s nothing special.” they agree instead of argue their points. They are not stuck in the 90s like the Brad Pitt fans here.

@Loves it: he didn’t say that what he said was doing mr and mrs two will bring the baggage..

@hehehe: Baggage as in MAN ANUSton.

To Tabloids @ 10/12/2009 at 5:19 pm

Just to remind you, Jen never love Brad, she is too in love with herself, she loves the spotlight and attention she had being attached to Brad. This means that crying over Brad is another strategy to gain sympathy and attention so faniston will go see her **** happens movie. She probably has all the copies of the tabloids where she is in the cover and sleeps with them too. She simply adores herself, she is just not capable of loving anyone. Why do you think all the men run away? because staying too long with Maniston deprives anyone of love and affection. She did say she does not mind dogs though and that’s what she has. Her life simply says a lot about her.

@Loves it:
Brad was beautiful in the 90′s but I didn’t find him hot back then. Now he just oozes sexiness and hotness.

an oldie @ 10/12/2009 at 4:13 pm

i could be wrong but i thought some mentioned that brad said in his interwiew (very early ones probably when he was much younger) that he prefers brunette over blonde. it makes sense that all of his previous girlfriends are mosty brunette except gwen & MANiston. again, i could be wrong.

IB Box Office @ 10/12/2009 at 5:42 pm

Through Sunday:

$118,297,669 Domestic (boxofficemojo)
$154,945,570 Overseas (uip)
——————
$273,243,239 Worldwide

to love it @ 10/12/2009 at 5:46 pm

Here are the best words that pretty much SUMS UP Pitt’s life prior to Jan 7, 2005(Separation from Jennifer Aniston):

1.) Whn asked how much his life has changed since the divorce, and the kids, and the charity – he said prior to the kidss, something like ” my life had reached a dead-end. I was fed up of sitting down on the coach and doing nothing. …now I am father etc etc…

2.) When asked about having kids before now, he said – “Fatherhood was going to happen one day, it was a natural progression but it wasn’t until Jolie, did I feel ready to be a father. In, short, his wigglies($perm for the uneducated) did not feel up to the SWIM to the ovum until they saw Jolie with them eyes and for REAL….and from then onward, it was HALLUEJAH for the wigglles. Hence the hot hot hot “therapy session” toward the end of the Mr&Mrs Smith.

*** Bottomline, love it – you make the mistake of thinking Jolie is a problem for Pitt. THAT right there is a hint that

A.) YOU do not KNOW BRAD PITT

B.) I think you drunk too much of the “golden couple(Brad and Jen)” kool-aid…and lost touch with the REAL BRAD PITT. The real Brad Pitt is actuallly more compatible with Angelina Jolie than with Jennifer Aniston. Don’t believe me? Ask Fincher(the Director of Fight Club) – he said people do not realize that the real Brad Pitt is more like Tyler Durden than the version put of there by the Hollywood media, PR and those who bought into the fairytale of Brad and Jennifer Aniston.

***I am of the view that, you couldn’t have had two very incompatible people like Brad and Jennifer marrying, hence, the “NO SUPRISE” when their marriage when kaput/finito ***
It just had to come to an end.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/12/2009 at 5:48 pm

IB week-end sales figures UPDATED (more than previousley planned)
****************************************************************************
Domestic: $118,297,669 (box office mojo)
+ Foreign: $154,700,000 (THR)

——————————————————————————–

= Worldwide: $272,997,669

.
.
IB is number 15 after 8 weeks of release and has still 11 market left where it should be released, Japan being the last one.
.
Now that it has reached the minimum figure I predict (270 M), it only needs 27 M to reach $300,000,000
.
Congrats to Tarantino to have reached 200 M for the first time in his career. Congrats to him for reaching 300 M…soon.
.
Cograts to Brad for having two blockbusters in a row, R rated at that, reaching 300+ M !!!

@Loves it:
I don’t expect Maniston fans cherish Brad Pitt. Clearly they are the minority. It doesn’t matter. After all Maniston fan base is shrinking not many left there. Her latest box office flops are the proof. Meanwhile Brad Pitt’s fan base is expanding bigger than ever. He is the biggest movie star in the world.

Passing Through @ 10/12/2009 at 6:04 pm

# 210 Neil @ 10/12/2009 at 10:25 am
.
I love Charlene and Angie. I think they are both fascinating, beautiful and talented women. Both have interesting stories to tell and I don’t like the idea of people treating Charlene like she was some sort of threat to Angie. In fact I would like to see a serious film made with both of them working together (add Monica Bellucci and oh my….). Just my two cents.
.
++++++++++++++++
.
Neil -
.
You’re not alone. I’ve been staying out of this convo because it seems pointless to me – but I really, really, really just do not understand all the Charlize bashing. Not only is she no threat to Angie, but unlike X Charlize is actually very talented and doesn’t spend her life plotting ways to get media attention. There are a lot of very talented actresses out there who have a string of box office duds to their names. So what? There was a time when Angie was one of those women, too. The fact of the matter is – movies featuring male actors fare better with the public. The end. Look at all the bad movies Jim Carrey, Eddie Murphy, Adam Sandler, Will Ferrell, etc, have made. They keep getting movies funded. Equally talented actresses are most often relegated to the girlfriend roles.
.
Chick flicks just don’t make as much money at the box office. And bear in mind, this in no way let’s X off the hook. She consistently makes bad movies and has the bad reviews to prove it.
These other actresses are making critically acclaimed movies and they’re just not doing well at the box office. There are so few good roles for women that all of the best actresses have to fight for those roles. “The Tourist” ain’t one of them. “Changeling” was a movie that every actress in HW set their cap on and Brian Glazer and Ron Howard chose Angie. Right now Halle Berry can’t get a plum role to save her ife. Angie’s in an eviable position because she can get just about any role she wants and doesn’t want to work more than once a year. So Charlize is no threat to Angie and all this bashing is pointless. I can understand if you just plain don’t like her, but there’s no contest going on between Angie and Charlize.
.
BTW, re: the idea of Angie and Charlize in a movie together? I can see them in a Thelma & Louise-type movie or maybe a film-noir 40s throwback. Speaking of film noir – I’ve always thought Angie would be great in the Barbara Stanwyck role from Double Indemnity.

The Bruiser @ 10/12/2009 at 6:06 pm

@well:

Just like Renee Zellweger’s last 2 flops in a row mainly New in Town and My One and Only. But I bet Renee will still keep working. And let’s not forget all the flops Nicole Kidman has had in the last 5 years but guess what, she is still working. Just like Jennifer Aniston will keep working.

The Bruiser @ 10/12/2009 at 6:11 pm

In fact, name me one, ONE actress that hasn’t had her share of flops and is still working. The only actress I can think of is Oscar winner Geena Davis who went from films to TV and then her TV show flopped. Poor Geena is nowhere to be found.

@The Bruiser:
Maniston is not in the same league of Renee and Nicole and never will be. She is not even as talent as Meg Ryan is however she is heading the direction of Meg’s career.

@The Bruiser:
One major element you forgot to include in your comparisons: Renee and Nicole have TALENT (and Oscars to prove it). Maniston doesn’t.

the real lou @ 10/12/2009 at 6:15 pm

# 323 The Bruiser @ 10/12/2009 at 6:06 pm …Why are you comparing X to Renee Zellweger and Nicole Kidman?These are Oscar winners/nominees.They have dramatic acting skills.There is NO comparison what-so-ever talent wise.X is not in the same league,sorry.

the real lou @ 10/12/2009 at 6:17 pm

# 326 an oldie @ 10/12/2009 at 6:15 pm….Great minds think alike,lol.

Passing Through @ 10/12/2009 at 6:22 pm

# 254 an oldie @ 10/12/2009 at 2:14 pm
.
4-FAME (£906,877)
5-LOVE HAPPENS (£558,361)
6-HALLOWEEN II (£522,261)
.
+++++++++++++++++
.
ROTFLMAO. Soooooo…Shite Happens could only must $885,013 in the UK, but Fame made 1,437,41? Guess there aren’t as many hens in the UK as we thought there were. X is no doubt on her way to buy a new bikini as a consolation prize for yet another tanking. A Meh-hee-coan Ass & Cooch Show can’t be far behind. Get it – behind? BBBWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Just a little X ass humor there…

@the real lou:
Because everything is so clear and obvious to everybody, except to the trolls and haters.

the real lou @ 10/12/2009 at 6:24 pm

God,these trolls/haters cannot even can up with intelligent arguments.Go back and read “Love it” and “The Bruiser” posts and you will see what I mean.

Passing Through @ 10/12/2009 at 6:04 pm
Perfect (for the fist time I have to agree with you).
Male stars make bad movies (like Couples Retreat this weekend) and succeeds sometimes. Male stars make more money.
I said this about two weeks ago. This is obvious.
This is why I think Angie should do more movies now.
This time is her best (30s is the best for females stars).
I hope she sign for this movie (or other).
She is a movie star, not a baby machine like some people think (in this blog).

@Passing Through:
Guess there aren’t as many hens in the UK as we thought there were
====================

Maybe the hens are actually outsourced paid posters located in Mumbai.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/12/2009 at 5:48 pm

Pulp Fiction made more than 200 million too.
But IB made more money (not counting inflation).

And probably IB will do more than 300 million worldwide.

@aj: no one think of her a baby machine except stupid people. Angie is a mother by choice since she was 27

@aj:
Angie’s priority is children and Brad first, then the UN duty and last is her career. If she and Brad want more babies, it’s their business.

the real lou @ 10/12/2009 at 6:39 pm

# 329 Passing Through @ 10/12/2009 at 6:22 pm ….I actually know someone who went to see Sh*t Happens.(A neighbor who is a X fan)Even she had to admit is was bad,very BAD.She asked me if I knew the movies budget.After I told her $18 million her exact words were…..”Jen will be stuck in low budget movie hell for whats left of her career.I don’t see any studio sinking big money in the crap she keeps cranking out.”

Passing Through @ 10/12/2009 at 6:41 pm

# 290 lola @ 10/12/2009 at 3:37 pm
.
I think Charlize is a better actress, at least she’s straight than the other *****!
.
++++++++++++++++
.
ROTFL. I like Charlize…but…judging by your comment you haven’t heard the rumors about Charlize and Stuart’s penchant for threesomes…and the other woman ain’t for him. They’ve just been smart enough never to hire hookers and be dumb enough to videotape it.

Passing Through @ 10/12/2009 at 6:22 pm
Fame made much more money. It’s not the first week of “Fame”.
But UK people love musicals – there are many succesful musicals in London – and “Fame” is a succesful movie there (It was number one movie there in first week).

the real lou @ 10/12/2009 at 6:43 pm

# 332 aj @ 10/12/2009 at 6:25 pm

# 334 aj @ 10/12/2009 at 6:32 pm

************************************************
I see the number crunching X fan is back to using the alias aj,lol.

@the real lou:
My neighbor said few years ago after she went to see RHI (because she is a fan of Shirley McLain and Kevin Costner) that “Jennifer should have stayed home and have Brad Pitt’s babies instead of acting in movies”. Ouch.

@Loves it:

YOU stupid A s shole he did not say that about his family. Check out the Charlie Rose interview. He talked in terms of the media and the nuts like you who will not leave this family alone.

You don’t have to like that they are together. My thought is why in the
H e ll are you even on a thread about them. You obviously don’t respect them yet you as I can see have been here for hours posting over and over again..

Get a freakin life and take care it. Brad and Angie are taking care of theirs.

del @ 10/12/2009 at 6:38 pm
Exactly: their problem.
It’s weird that some people want that they don’t do movies.
This is their problem and I don’t think that they will leave their careers.
She said that she will do less movies in the future, not now.

Very cool if it happens.

Thanks Jared.

Passing Through @ 10/12/2009 at 6:53 pm

# 306 Loves it @ 10/12/2009 at 5:03 pm
.
@debra77: Brad Pitt is the one that called his family baggage when he was asked if he would do a movie with Angie. He said they would have to deal with all the baggage that came along with that. Angie says it nicer when she says no they wouldn’t do a movie together because one of them as to stay with the kids. Note she doesn’t refer to her family as baggage.
.
+++++++++++++++++++
.
ROTFLMBAO. God…these trolls get dumber each and every day. With the context in which “baggage” was used…how in the hell did the troll think Brad meant their children? Only a complete moron wouln’t realize that Brad and Angie gave TWO SEPARATE ANSWERS? The “baggage” Brad referred to was their relationship and interacting as colleagues on a set, keeping the two separate and not taking work home with them – not to mention dealing with the media and ratzi constantly meddling in the shoot. Meanwhile Angie is being more pragmatic and saying they’ve agreed that their family comes before work and they want one parent available to the children at all times. BUT…the troll got something completely different out of Brad’s answer. The calisthentics the trolls do to twist Brad and Angie’s words never ceases to amuse me. Being that fvcking stupid has GOT to be physically painful…

the real lou @ 10/12/2009 at 6:43 pm

I think you is a JA (or X if you prefer) fan. Only JA fans want that Angie don’t do movies.
She is famous because of the movies and she can do movies and mantain the family’s priority.
A movie only takes one to three months. This is not much time (one movie per year). And they have resources to pay for help (and they have help).

the real lou @ 10/12/2009 at 7:00 pm

# 341 an oldie @ 10/12/2009 at 6:45 pm ……My X fan neighbor also said RHI was awful.Funny thing is,she has NEVER uttered the words X should have stayed home to have Brads babies.2 years ago she admitted Angelina and Brad were the better match.As a matter of fact,she is into Angelina and Brad MORE than X.She told me this when she admitted to seeing X’s piece of crap movie.I couldn’t shut her up after she saw Changeling and IB.Sh*t Happens on the other hand she barely wanted to discuss,LOL.

Passing Through @ 10/12/2009 at 7:05 pm

# 332 aj @ 10/12/2009 at 6:25 pm
.
Passing Through @ 10/12/2009 at 6:04 pm
Perfect (for the fist time I have to agree with you).
.
+++++++++++++++++++
.
Oh golly. You just can’t imagine how much it means to me that you agree with me. Let me see if I can quantify it for you. Hmmmm…I’d have to say that you agreeing with my is the second greatest non-event in my life…like, evah. The first greatest non-event would have to be that 10 minutes of Friends I was able to sit through. Or possibly that time when I was 14 and thought I got my period during gym class and it turned out to be a false alarm and I had to play field hockey anyway. Wait…both of those non-events were better than you agreeing with so, I’m changing my mind – you agreeing with me would have to be THE BIGGEST NON-EVENT IN MY LIFE, BAR NONE.

val @ 10/12/2009 at 5:15 pm I mean and is living the life he always wanted….
Sorry the trolls are annoying me ever since that biche wrote that article
——————————
Don’t insult biches, poor things! LOL These animals are beautiful and majestic, female deer don’t deserve to be lumped in with morons and b*tchiing women with issues. LOL

@the real lou:
ShitHappens….What is there to discuss? LOL. I lurked at Perez, but rarely read the comments. I did one time after misManagement bombed and Perez had a thread about it. One of the posters wrote she went to see the movie with her husband and 3 other couples. They do those movie dates once a month I think and after the movie she said they went to dinner to discuss it. I was like WTF? Discuss a movie like misManagement, and with 3 other couples? Wow, how profound. Needless to say I think that poster lied and she probably was no other than our Ellie.

Passing Through @ 10/12/2009 at 7:08 pm

# 337 the real lou @ 10/12/2009 at 6:39 pm
.
LOL, TRL. You should tell your neighbor that she should have listened to you and waiting for the Red Box $1 rental! I hope she at least only wasted her money on a matinee.

Passing Through @ 10/12/2009 at 7:11 pm

# 340 the real lou @ 10/12/2009 at 6:43 pm
.
# 332 aj @ 10/12/2009 at 6:25 pm

# 334 aj @ 10/12/2009 at 6:32 pm

************************************************
I see the number crunching X fan is back to using the alias aj,lol.
.
++++++++++++++++++
.
Yeah. I’m trying to figure out why she keeps responding to MY posts…like I give a Shite Happens what she thinks…

Passing Through @ 10/12/2009 at 7:05 pm
Not so much time, and you made another stupid post PT, like usual.
But that doesn’t change that you made a good post abou male and female stars.
And I can see good post of other people. If you can’t, it’s your problem. I don’t care.

Passing Through @ 10/12/2009 at 7:13 pm

# 341 an oldie @ 10/12/2009 at 6:45 pm
.
@the real lou:
My neighbor said few years ago after she went to see RHI (because she is a fan of Shirley McLain and Kevin Costner) that “Jennifer should have stayed home and have Brad Pitt’s babies instead of acting in movies”. Ouch.
.
+++++++++++++++++++++
.
Oh snap! Now that’s funny. Thank God she didn’t. The world really DOES NOT need that chin and her original honker foisted on some poor unsuspecting child.

# 348
Passing Through @ 10/12/2009 at 7:05 pm

# 332 aj @ 10/12/2009 at 6:25 pm
.
Passing Through @ 10/12/2009 at 6:04 pm
Perfect (for the fist time I have to agree with you).
.
+++++++++++++++++++
.
Oh golly. You just can’t imagine how much it means to me that you agree with me. Let me see if I can quantify it for you. Hmmmm…I’d have to say that you agreeing with my is the second greatest non-event in my life…like, evah. The first greatest non-event would have to be that 10 minutes of Friends I was able to sit through. Or possibly that time when I was 14 and thought I got my period during gym class and it turned out to be a false alarm and I had to play field hockey anyway. Wait…both of those non-events were better than you agreeing with so, I’m changing my mind – you agreeing with me would have to be THE BIGGEST NON-EVENT IN MY LIFE, BAR NONE.
=====================

OMG, PT. You have me in stitches again.

the real lou @ 10/12/2009 at 7:15 pm

# 350 an oldie @ 10/12/2009 at 7:08 pm …It probably was Elle,LOL.

the real lou @ 10/12/2009 at 7:20 pm

# 352 Passing Through @ 10/12/2009 at 7:11 pm …Yeah. I’m trying to figure out why she keeps responding to MY posts…like I give a Shite Happens what she thinks…

*********************************************************
You and your stalkers,LOL.Did you notice she accused me of being a X fan?As if,I wasn’t fan of the trick when she was married to Brad.And I sure as hell didn’t tune in to watch Friends every week.

Passing Through @ 10/12/2009 at 7:23 pm

# 353 aj @ 10/12/2009 at 7:12 pm
.
Why are you still addressing posts to me? Are you trying to hog all 10 spots on my Top 10 List of Greatest Non-Events In my Life? That shite is just so selfish. Have some respect for your fellow trolls and stalkers, dammit! Your latest post has bumped Assley from the #4 postion down to #5…

Passing Through @ 10/12/2009 at 7:26 pm

# 357 the real lou @ 10/12/2009 at 7:20 pm
.
Yeah, I caught that X-fan-accusation. Like we needed further proof that she’s off her rocker. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again – the trolls here used to be much smarter than this current lot…not that that’s saying much…

Hopefully this will sink that Goree picture she keeps alluding to -bahahaha!! No way will she get the funding she needs from any studio worth it’s salt, and due to her being a cheap azz’d basterd unwilling to part with her own money, count on that being in limbo or development hell for a good long time. It’s funny how on the back of a Golden Lab she thought she could write her own ticket, and probably had a few studios wavering too (as Huvane tried tricking them into thinking she was a plus for the box office) — but this trouncing of her last piece of sh*t movie, was very indicative of her TRUE worth in terms of box office, and the industry knows it. They realize that all of the other was just so much Huvane smoke & mirrors. The most recent flop was a bellweather for her. No question. I call toast. Maniston would be lucky if she can bring the Goree girls to Lifetime TV at this point. LOL

The Bruiser @ 10/12/2009 at 7:41 pm

@the real lou:

Quote:” Why are you comparing X to Renee Zellweger and Nicole Kidman?These are Oscar winners/nominees.They have dramatic acting skills.There is NO comparison what-so-ever talent wise.X is not in the same league,sorry.”

Hey, a flop is a flop no matter if that actress has an Oscar or not. In fact. Nicole Kidman has had more financial flops than Aniston. And don’t forget, Aniston is # 6 on Forbes list as being one of the top actresses to return a profit to the studios. I didn’t see Kidman or Zellweger on that list.

Read more: http://justjared.buzznet.com/2009/10/11/angelina-jolie-replaces-charlize-theron-as-touristangelina-jolie-charlize-theron-the-tourist/all-comments/#comments#ixzz0TlfvGlRU

Passing Through @ 10/12/2009 at 7:23 pm
For the same reason that you are saying stupid things about my posts.
Do you think that I care about your oppinion?
This is internet. I don’t know you – happily – and you don’t know me.
I like to talk about some things.
Some people here only like the Angie’s celebrity.
But this doesn’t exist without her career.
And the most stupid people here – you included – think that everybody that talks something different is JA fan.
And worst, you think that saying dumb things you can win a discussion.
Sorry, but you lost. And every time that you low the level, you are loosing.

The Bruiser @ 10/12/2009 at 7:46 pm

@CLINIQUA:

Sorry to disappoint you Cliniqua but The Goree Girls is in pre-production and begins shooting in January and will be directed by Michael Sucsy who directed the multi Emmy Award HBO film, Grey Gardens starring Jessica Lange and Drew Barrymore.

Passing Through @ 10/12/2009 at 7:23 pm
And this isn’t your blog. I adress your post everytime I want.
Not that you deserve, cause much of the time you write dumb things.

dumb is you aj . please stop using aj’s name try mani

Damn Baby Jane has to act, sing and play the guitar. The girl can’t walk and chew gum at the same time. Rachel in a singing prison movie set in the 40′s. As if. . When will Hollyweird learn. Give up on ole lonely girl and send her back to TV staring in a Variety show or infomercials.

Let’s hope that Rachel sings in Prison movie stay in pre-production. The world begs ya Hollyweird.

the real lou @ 10/12/2009 at 8:06 pm

# 361 The Bruiser @ 10/12/2009 at 7:41 pm …..Hey, a flop is a flop no matter if that actress has an Oscar or not. In fact. Nicole Kidman has had more financial flops than Aniston.

**********************************************************
Yes,Nicole has has had some flops.Nicole Kidman and Renee Zellweger will be FOREVER KNOWN as Oscar winning/nominated actresses something X will NEVER be.I think that ranks higher than some Forbes list thank you.LOL.

@The Bruiser: Preproduction and a start date doesn’t mean the movie will get done!! The plug can be pulled at any time for any reason. It also doesn’t mean all of the money is in place. I’m not suggesting the movie WON’T get done, I’m just saying “preproduction” doesn’t really mean anything. “Tourist” was in “preproduction” before with a start date of March 2009!! Now they’re looking for a star and a director. See what I mean?

Bahahaha!! nice try #363 — but this sucker doesn’t even have a cast!!!
.
Status:Pre-production
.
Status Updated:5 August 2009 (uh, that meansthis info hasn’t changed for more than two months, and it still has not been casted and is not written)
.
Note:Because this project is categorized as being in production, the data is subject to change; some data could be removed completely.
.
See that — “some data could be removed completely,” it says, Why??…because most people know that ‘in production,’ but especially ‘pre-production,’ is a very VERY shaky designation and could easily all go away at any point…besides that – only an idiot makes imdb their bible. Hahahaha!! Do a google news search on Michael Sucsy right now, and you’ll see not ONE story mentions Goree Girls or Maniston. He may have had them scrubbed, OR….perhaps there are no items that exist.
.
Oh, and by the way, Grey Gardens was TEEEE. VEEEEE.
.
Later!
.
:)

lol @ 10/12/2009 at 7:58 pm
Sorry, but you are the perfect dumb.
You weren’t in the discussion.
You only came for a dumb post.

The Bruiser @ 10/12/2009 at 7:46 pm @CLINIQUA:

Sorry to disappoint you Cliniqua but The Goree Girls is in pre-production and begins shooting in January

————–

January ?? I thought filler face said she will take a break (at JoeFranceis Me-Hi_Ko beach mansion or my plastic surgeon office ) for at least 6 months during her Sh.t happen movie premier on Sept .

The Bruiser @ 10/12/2009 at 7:41 pm
Hey, a flop is a flop no matter if that actress has an Oscar or not. In fact. Nicole Kidman has had more financial flops than Aniston. And don’t forget, Aniston is # 6 on Forbes list as being one of the top actresses to return a profit to the studios. I didn’t see Kidman or Zellweger on that list.
———————————————-
Please understand how Forbes calculates to make this list. It means that as long as Aniston is PAID CHEAP, she will remain profitable. Any actress who is willing to work for CHEAP will be on the top of the Forbes list.

Of course Nicole Kidman and Zellweger are not on the list, because they are NOT going to accept low pay. They have the leverage to ask for high pay being the Oscar holder.

@citi:
Don’t forget that all Maniston’s movies that made money were not hers (remember that certain guy named Vince Vaughn who just had a $35M first weekend movie?)

aj @ 10/12/2009 at 7:43 pm
And the most stupid people here – you included – think that everybody that talks something different is JA fan.

===================================
We would care less if you’re a JA fan. We poked fun of Aniston because she’s someone you are familiar with. It doesnt make sense to quote some unknown actress in our posts.

@aj: get out here werido . I was following what you have been saying..

Nothing much about the Jolie-Pitt family so I will say goodnight everyone. neleh, thanks a lot for the links & senior, I check the birthday pictures, I will comment later. You all look good. God bless the Jolie-Pitt family.

lol @ 10/12/2009 at 8:47 pm
Double dumb.
Do you think that your dumb post makes me go away?
I came back everytime I want.
And this is my last answer for your dumb posts.

Jenretards are idiots with brain the size of a pea, you would think they have learned their lessons by now, they have tried every trick and spin but each time fail miserably. They keep coming back for more trashing. You should all know by now that whatever you say or do, you can never break up Brad and Angie’s relationship, they are tighter than ever. Give it up LOSERS, it ain’t working. Brad loves Angie and his children and Angie loves Brad. He will never go back to the barren serial dumpee deadend he dumped almost 5yrs ago, he’s been there, humped and dumped her like all the rest the men in her life, Angie is all woman, younger, fertile, gorgeous, exciting, talented, a wonderful mother with a heart of GOLD. Brad loves his life now, you losers should stop living in the past and hoping. If you love maniston that much, pray for her to find some real man instead of Norman. Her time is ticking fast, i’m sure you losers won’t like to see her end up with Norman as her only LOVER.

@ellie’:
And why don’t you watch her movies at least ten times so that they would not bomb in the box office. Also you’re a very big fan of the Fug Aniston but you didn’t support her no wonder her two movies bomb big time.

credit jjb

Angelina Jolie Spotlight

There’s only one Angelina Jolie. All the entertainment magazines and horny male journalists can spend paragraphs trying to pin down the source of Angelina’s sex appeal: Is it the famous lips? Those smoldering eyes? That awesome voice? Her appeal is everything combined and the fact that the combination is so incredibly unique that makes her complete package. No offense to Cameron Diaz or Jessica Biel, but it’s not hard to believe that you might know someone who looks like them. You don’t know anyone who looks like Angelina Jolie. There’s only one, even when she’s rendered in computer generated 3-D in Beowulf.

Angelina could have easily disappeared after her late ’90s and early ’00s success, but she built on it in every single arena, giving better performances, doing more humanitarian work around the world, and, of course, being half of one of the most beautiful Hollywood couples of all time. In other words, she’s an award-winning actress, life-saving humanitarian, and half of Brangelina. The world wouldn’t be the same without her.

http://www.ugo.com/movies/angelina-jolie/

Ok, I don’t take part in the conversations about Jennifer Aniston because frankly I don’t care enough about her. To me whatever she does or says, however hard she tries doesn’t affect Brad, Angie or their family one bit. So I’m indifferent about her , I just don’t care about her or her movies.
But I was talking to one of my friends the other day, she watches the entertainment shows but she’s an off-liner and doesn’t read blogs or follow celebrity news that closely. My friend watches the movie “P.S. , I Love You” all the time , and has LOVED Gerard Butler ever since the first time she saw the movie. So the other day she tells me that she’d just heard that there was a rumor that Jennifer was dating Gerard and her reaction was “hell no! Not her, don’t date HER Gerard!” and went on line right away to check if it was true. LOL First I told her that this rumor had been around for a while, and after I stopped laughing, out of curiosity I asked her why she reacted the way she did and why she didn’t like Jennifer. She told me that she thought Jennifer was just bland, that she didn’t think she was that great an actress, that she plays the same roles all the time, while giving the same one-note “Rachel” performance, and that she was still speaking about Brad too much. I asked her if she read the internet and this blog specifically because she basically cited all the same reasons as everyone who doesn’t like Jennifer here does, just to make sure. She was so mad that Gerard might be dating Jennifer, and she made sure to point out to me that Gerard had flatly denied it. LOL She doesn’t see what the big deal is about Jennifer, that she’s one of those celebrities that the media tells you to like because she’s a big deal, when she’s not. I just thought my friend’s reaction was funny because if I didn’t know better I’d swear she read this blog. LOL But I know she doesn’t and I just wanted to tell you guys that even people who don’t follow blogs and day-to-day news about Jennifer still are aware of her antics and don’t like her much either for the exact same reasons. LOL

@Felinelilly:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Unbelievable and here you are speaking about Jennifer Aniston.. Never ends..

@aj: Don’t even try to fit in here, you are odd. The worst thing you can do is calling fans dumb. That is the dummest thing . Do me a favour don’t answer for this.hahaha

ellie’ @ 10/12/2009 at 9:49 pm @Felinelilly:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Unbelievable and here you are speaking about Jennifer Aniston.. Never ends..
——————————-
And what’s it to you? Never mind, don’t answer because I don’t care.
I told a story about my friend’s reaction to her, I don’t give a sh*t about your precious Jennifer. Calm down.

andamentothat @ 10/12/2009 at 10:18 pm

Greetings fans..

Wow, Ange to star in the Tourist.. that should be an exciting film especially if they film in France.. the family can stay at Miraval and she can film and be back at la grande maison.. And yes Sam is a mighty fine bloke as well!!! If I remember correct, the Broccollis had him in the short list to play Bond before Daniel Craig was chosen..

andamentothat @ 10/12/2009 at 10:25 pm

Good to see regulars on the board.. Waving to Cliniqua, FelineLily, Passing Through ( your tenacity with the trolls is amaZing) , Oldie, senior, the real lou, Neleh (muaaah) , ebmo (get out of hiding dear) , irma, dianand1968 and all the clever writers dawne, gracie..

So we have a lot to look forward to next year..

(1) Filming of Wanted 2
(2) Premiere of Salt
(3) Premiere of Tree of Life
(4) Filming of Lost city of Z
(5) Kung fu Panda 2 something ..
(6) Filming of Softbank commercials
(7) More UNHCR trips together
(8) Make it right getting to 150 homes – big gala
(9) All kids staying happy, healthy and actively competing with her Hairness
(10) Great interviews from Ange and Brad – y’know soulmates and all!!

# 380 jorge @ 10/12/2009 at 9:07 pm

ellie is here instead of on her old idol’s thread. MANiston has a total of 3 posts since 11:30am this morning. how sad is that? where are MANiston’s fans.

ellie’ -

Many of my friends dont like Aniston either !!! They all said the same thing that she played “Rachel” in all her movies again, and again.

Tell me, did you see her movie management?

san antonio @ 10/12/2009 at 10:40 pm

@ aj

Sorry, but you are the perfect dumb.

killer bee @ 10/12/2009 at 10:51 pm

citi @ 10/12/2009 at 8:25 pm

It means that Angelina Jolie is not worth the money she is being paid – she is not worth the bang for buck

Totals were compiled for each star’s compensation on her last three films and the operating income on those films, and total operating income was divided by the star’s total compensation to come up with each return on investment number.

killer bee @ 10/12/2009 at 10:54 pm

That leaves #6, Jennifer Aniston — actually a very good example of a solid mid-range star with a solid Middle American following whose movies bring in solid, above-average returns. She’s more of a audience draw for “He’s Just Not That Into You” than Connelly, “Marley and Me” made a mint, and even “The Break-Up” was a box-office success. If actresses were stocks — which is what this list is all about, really — Aniston would be a utility.

killer bee @ 10/12/2009 at 10:51 pm

It means that Angelina Jolie is not worth the money she is being paid – she is not worth the bang for buck
Totals were compiled for each star’s compensation on her last three films and the operating income on those films, and total operating income was divided by the star’s total compensation to come up with each return on investment number.
————————————
The return on investment is a “ratio” or a “percentage”. Just looking at the % or the ratio is MEANINGLESS. You need to factor in the movie gross. Let me give you an example

A) Total operating income from the movie , for example derailed ( 30M)
Aniston being paid 8 M.
Net income = 22M ( 30 – 8)

B) Total operating income from the movie ( eg Wanted) 300 M
Jolie being paid 20M
Net income = 280M ( 300 – 20)

As an investor, who would you want to hire? Of course Angie, because I’d rather pay Angie more money and GAIN 280M

dianad1968 @ 10/12/2009 at 11:11 pm

@killer bee:

#392

LOL, You people are REALLY funny in your defense of Filler Face. She was part of an ensemble in HJNTIY, and she was not the draw for M&M. Trust me, if she was a stock, she would be a penny stock. LOL

Gerard Butles is actually pretty great looking when he’s wearing a suit. he was on Leno last week looking spiffy. killer bee, Angie is worth something to you otherwise you wouldn’t be in here bihtcing about her. take your agenda elsewhere.

killer bee @ 10/12/2009 at 10:51 pm
It means that Angelina Jolie is not worth the money she is being paid – she is not worth the bang for buck
Totals were compiled for each star’s compensation on her last three films and the operating income on those films, and total operating income was divided by the star’s total compensation to come up with each return on investment number.

================================
It is the MOVIE GROSS which an actor/actress brought in that is important. Aniston did NOT bring in high gross sales. All those ratios or % are misleading.

Another example:–

I am an aspiring actress. I am willing to be paid $ 10. I then made a movie, with movie ticket gross at $ 10,000. So the return on me is 10000 fold, much better than Aniston. Do you think movie execs will hire me? Of course not, because my gross sales is only $ 10K.

The point is, Aniston is paid LOW. She is willing to work for CHEAP. And that’s the reason she has a good return on investment.

@ killer bee

Aniston will always be hired as long as she is WILLING TO WORK FOR CHEAP.

Well, all I know is, for all Maniston’s draw, she drew less than CZJ. You would expect ShiitHappens to make more than “No Reservations” (with Aron Eckhard and CZJ), but it looks like it won’t. No Reservations made $43M domestic and a world wide total of $90M. Somehow I don’t see ShiitHappens doing it.

Ange hasn’t released a film in an entire year and you still bithc and complain about everything. her kids, their hair, their clothes. how she decides to spend her time. you bithc about how she lives her life in every thread. give it a rest.

killer bee @ 10/12/2009 at 11:35 pm

citi @ 10/12/2009 at 11:05 pm

you are missing the point. The return from the movie was not great enough to justify the investment.

It doesn’t matter how big or small the numbers are – For every dollar she was paid, she did not return a high enough investment to the studio.

@killer bee:
a solid mid-range star with a solid Middle American following whose movies bring in solid, above-average returns.
====================

LOL at all the “solid” in your posts. I also have to laugh at your “with a solid Middle American following”. How did you come up with the idea? Since when is Filler Face “Middle America”? I thought you hens call her “the Golden California Girl”? I was just reading the comments on Nikki Finke’s blog, and a poster there attributed Vince Vaughn’s success to his “Middle America’s following”. Did you just steal that idea from them? Vince Vaughn as a Middle America is acceptable, but Filler Face sunbathing in Me hee Co in a too small bikini is Middle America? GMAFB.

passing through, that’s just more proof that Brad is not an honest person. Im sure they have talked about doing a movie together so they both have the same answer. “no, because of kids.” but brad gives the answer he thinks people want to hear(maybe) and Angelina gives the truth (No) whether people want to hear it or not. same with marriage. A says no because they dont need it and B says maybe when gays can do it. he’s a liar and it is time you admit that you are a megafan of someone that has u fooled.:)

The liars are usually supported by middle America. Tom cruise before he dumped his fabulous publicist was middle Americas captain. Brad Pitt is loved by them. any bad from pitt they just put on Angelina. “I will always be the evil Queen”- Angie . she knows where she stands.

@reply | Flag This
# 71 da truth truth prevails @ 10/11/2009 at 7:21 pm @The Bruiser:

Let’s see Angie’s last three films made over 1 BILLION $$$$$.
No flops for her, Angie is the ultimate A-Lister, world mega star. She only makes one film a year and is still at the top of the pyramid for film roles. This woman has got IT going on.
Now now, You are just confused poor dear, Angie was not in Non-Management or Love Doesn’t Happen, those MAJOR FLOPS.
I know you fell and hit your head and are living in lala land, right? So I am here and quite willing to educate you as to the verifiable truth.
I do wonder why Charlize would exit this, she badly needs a hit film .

Well IF Angie does this it will be 2nd film TomC was once attached to and left that Angie stars in. Woman power!!!
Read more: http://justjared.buzznet.com/2009/10/11/angelina-jolie-replaces-charlize-theron-as-touristangelina-jolie-charlize-theron-the-tourist/comment-page-3/#comments#ixzz0Tmik24B1\*********************
Isn’t that panda movie one of the three movies that made $1 billion? i can’t understand how the money that movie made can be attribured to jolie in any major way. it was a movie for children. Jack Black made that movie. do you really think it would have made a difference who did the voice for her part? There is no way. So please stop with the $1 billion fact. it is quite ridiculous

You do know how stupid that Forbes list is, right killerbee? Because if you don’t, I’m not stupid enough to enumerate it for you. The fact that they computed the box office for King Kong as a Naomi Watts movie, The Incredible Hulk as a Jennifer Connelly movie, Star Wars as a Natalie Portman movie etc. and that moviegoers flock to see them in it, is sooo wrong its not even funny.

You do know that Forbes didn’t took into consideration these people’s erm leading men right (like ohh Jim Carrey, Vince Vaughn, Ben Stiller, Own Wilson)? Who btw is actually the lead of the movie & earned like 15-20 million a film is really proof of this list’s stupidity. Or the fact that the movie is about a superhero, a cult classic?

The list is sooo wrong it would take a year to explain it all to you.

@reply | Flag This
# 79 LOL LOL @ 10/11/2009 at 7:33 pm @The Bruiser:

Oh Jen having a very bad day are you? The Baster re-shoots got you down after the poor test audiences reactions?

I know you can’t get cast in action or drama or any other type role but lame rom coms. The big male comedy stars run from you these days don’t they? Well you are too old for them, they cast younger women like VV just did in his hit film and like Ben Stiller does and like Jim Carrey does and Adam Sandler does.
Face it Jen you are over the hill for rom com leads with bigtime comedy males. Hey that’s life tv gurl.
Bruiser, snoozer, Jen, get a life. Your list reveals the depth of your obsession. Angie is out living her happy life, snuggling and cuddling with her loved ones, she does not have time for blogs.
I am sure Norman Aniston is crying out for your attention while you are here. Go give the love of your life a hug woman after you crawl into his doggy bed as you said that is where you like to sleep.
Read more: http://justjared.buzznet.com/2009/10/11/angelina-jolie-replaces-charlize-theron-as-touristangelina-jolie-charlize-theron-the-tourist/all-comments/#comments#ixzz0TmlAjJu2
********************************************************
what is wrong with you?
If Bruiser is quoting numbers, why are you bashing Jennifer Aniston? Are you obsessed with her? Because you can be a fan of Jolie and her boyfriend without bashing Aniston.

Let’s see…forget about Boxoffice ALL 3 of those movie are Oscar nominated. I think Panda was up for best animation wanted was up for a tech award and Changeling for best Actress. Haters gonna hate

credit jjb

Schwarzenegger signs tougher anti-paparazzi law

LOS ANGELES (AP) – California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has signed an anti-paparazzi bill making it easier to sue media outlets that use photos that invade celebrities’ privacy.

The former Terminator star signed an amendment Sunday to a decade-old law that allows fines against paparazzi who illegally or offensively take photos or recordings. The amendment permits lawsuits against media outlets that pay for and make first use of material they knew was improperly obtained.

Tabloid magazines, TV shows and Internet sites sometimes pay millions for celebrity fodder.

In 1998 Schwarzenegger had his car surrounded by paparazzi as he picked up his child from school. Other stars have had car accidents while trying to flee swarms of photographers.

The amendment takes effect in January

dianad1968 @ 10/13/2009 at 12:16 am

@dEE:

#404

So you say, Kungfu Panda was Jack Black’s movie, but they still needed Angie with her BIG BELLY front and center to sell the movie. Now that is what you call POWER. Deal with it.

dianad1968 @ 10/13/2009 at 12:22 am

@Loves it:

#403,

LOL, Brad Pitt clearly owns your a*s. You are obsessed with the man. And while you are – where ever you are – living your humdrum life, Brad is living his life with his family in his French mansion.

@ killer bee

If Aniston is such a good investment (according to your flawed logic), why wasnt Aniston command a high pay check? ?? Dont come back and tell me she chose to receive a smaller pay check because your Aniston is well known for being CHEAP.

groundcontrol @ 10/13/2009 at 1:32 am

wfb @ 10/12/2009 at 11:56 pm You do know how stupid that Forbes list is, right killerbee? The fact that they computed the box office for . . . The Incredible Hulk as a Jennifer Connelly movie . . . is sooo wrong its not even funny.
.
#####################
.
wfb, I do agree with you that the Forbes list is meaningless. It’s calculations mean nothing unless you also calculate how much in actual dollars were earned for each star.
.
But I do have to stick up for Jennifer Connelly. Many people did see Hulk because of Connelly. I think she clearly gets credit for that movie. She had, and maybe still does have, an incredible fan base of males of all ages. In the early days of the internet she and Pamela Anderson were the most downloaded photos on the internet. She also had a huge following of young females (obviously grown now) because of Labyrinth and other movies.
.
But I otherwise get your point.

massarelli @ 10/13/2009 at 1:38 am

The movies Cruise dumps Angelina gets. Not sure that’s a good sign.

dianad1968 @ 10/13/2009 at 1:43 am

@groundcontrol:

#412

It goes without saying that Angie is my favourite actress bar none. Following her, in a distant second is Jennifer Connelly. I saw Blood Diamond because of her, and I think she is absolutely. I also admire how she lives her life out of the public eye.

dianad1968 @ 10/13/2009 at 1:46 am

^^^^should read “absolutely beautiful”.

groundcontrol @ 10/13/2009 at 1:47 am

killer bee @ 10/12/2009 at 11:35 pm citi @ 10/12/2009 at 11:05 pm

you are missing the point. The return from the movie was not great enough to justify the investment.

It doesn’t matter how big or small the numbers are – For every dollar she was paid, she did not return a high enough investment to the studio.
.
####################
.
No, dear, you still don’t get it. It depends entirely on the numbers. If the numbers are big enough then the investment is worth it. The multiples being quoted on this list are meaningless. The analysis does not end with the multiples. You have to factor in the final tally of revenue streams to see if the investment was worth it. Volume is as important as percentage of return on investment – even more important once you hit a certain revenue figure.
.
Again, these lists are essential worthless.

@groundcontrol:

I guess we must agree to disagree :)

Incredible Hulk is a popular comic character, any other consideration will come after that. Hulk did as well as (or even better?) the first one with Liv Tyler as the female lead.

Jen fans are nutters @ 10/13/2009 at 3:02 am

I can’t believe people arguing that JEN is a great actor! CRAZY! NEXT, I think they’ll argue that Jen is better than Meryl Streep! LOL Some people will try and prove anything no matter how crazy.

Angie and Jen aren’t even close. Only retards would believe so. Angie has an Oscar, another nomination, other awards, more range, more interesting roles, and has worked with big directors. And Rachel is Rachel. Most critics have just blasted Aniston for Love Happens as really bland, barely there, and played out. Her schtick is old. She just can’t stretch and she’s too scared to take chances. She’s like a dog who only knows one trick–rolling over. Well, that trick has stopped working and people are begining to wonder why she keeps getting these roles. And, now it’s coming out that she’s funding them herself! That means people aren’t taking chances on her. Sorry, it doesn’t look good for Jen. Face the awful truth, Jen fans.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/13/2009 at 3:11 am

pokeman @ 10/12/2009 at 10:27 pm # 380 jorge @ 10/12/2009 at 9:07 pm

ellie is here instead of on her old idol’s thread. MANiston has a total of 3 posts since 11:30am this morning. how sad is that? where are MANiston’s fans.
————————————————–
They became new Charlize fans OVERNIGHT and are here to to tell us that she is a brilliant actress who they have been always fans of…
.
though they didn’t see her latetst movies (or probably not a single one of her career, Hancock except, but then again it’s because of Big Will) that imploded 6 times more than Mismanagement did in the domestic market.

I am a newbie to the site so please excuse my ignorance, but the trolls just blow my mind. They go from point A to C and then back to B. They totally lack logic or common sense.Do they all live by the lying tabs? Can they not be able to distinguish PR-BS and truth,? Their lives must be so narrow that they think JA is a MOVIE STAR When realty strikes the

CONGRATULATIONS VINCE VAUGH for a HIT MOVIE, and an impending marriage to a nice, NORMAL woman!!! Not a crybaby famewhore!

VAUGHN”S movie received WORSE reviews than LOVE HAPPENS and made 36 million in its first weekend! That’s 5 TIMES as much as JEN’s movie made! 5 TIMES!

Vince is a star people will pay to see in crappy movies, while JEN IS NOT. I bet JEN is crying because she didn’t trap Vince into a marriage and ride his coattails like she rode Brad’s!

I beleive Angelina will do a brillant job, she is such a good actress.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/13/2009 at 3:56 am

WOW! @ 10/13/2009 at 3:15 am CONGRATULATIONS VINCE VAUGH for a HIT MOVIE, and an impending marriage to a nice, NORMAL woman!!! Not a crybaby famewhore!

VAUGHN”S movie received WORSE reviews than LOVE HAPPENS and made 36 million in its first weekend! That’s 5 TIMES as much as JEN’s movie made! 5 TIMES!

Vince is a star people will pay to see in crappy movies, while JEN IS NOT. I bet JEN is crying because she didn’t trap Vince into a marriage and ride his coattails like she rode Brad’s!

———————————
Jen is a lousy schemer
.
She miscalculated when she opened her legs to Brad on the first date and made him move to her place three days later though she was still officially enganged to Tate. All this for personal gains.
.
She miscalulated when she dragged Brad into a marriage he felt lukewarm about (John Aniston revealed this), all this to have a green light in Hollywood through her new name : Jennifer Aniston Pitt.
.
She miscalculated when she played with rumors of being pregnant and was cynical enough to gave false positive tests of pregnancy to her teary husband.
.
She miscalculated when she chose to postpone pregnancy and didn’t even care being more present when her husband was into therapy 2 years while she was bashing him and his tastes publicly.
.
She miscalculated when she used to bring to Brad p*rn vids to rekindle his passion for her when that merger was already a waste of time deadend within the first year of marriage.
.
She miscalculated when she went with him into a daily boozing and smoking pot orgy just to make it more bearable the fact they were obliged to live together when she wasn’t publicly acknowledging to be releived when he was away for months.
.
She miscalcvulated when she said : ‘And Next, the Oscar’, egomaniac as she is, wrongly thinking that she is all that when she is straight up wack at the job.
.
She miscalculated when she asked him to have an affair with Angie instead of dumping her fair and square to begin courting Jolie.
.
She miscalculated when she dried humped Vince and let rumors said that they were going to get married and have children together while Pitt and Jolie will break up, using others gimmick and the infamous : ‘i never say i don’t want children, i did, i do and i will’…(b*tch please, who do you think you are kidding ?)
.
She miscalculated when she launches that vendetta against Jolie and the children, especially when she publicly showed her disgust towards Jolie’s unborn Shilo which triggered the shamefull hatred campaign towards that child who was villipy, wished to be misscarriaged or never born, born handicapped, even attempted to be killed by a nutcase, Manistonmaniac in Germany while she was still in her mother’s womb.
.
Maniston miscalculated when she tried to mouthzip and control The Urinator after he dumped her in a street conference saying : ‘You will never see that man do that again’
.

Maniston is just a lousy schemer who has dedicated the last 5 years of her life to a shameful vendetta, a policy that is now going back in full force to haunt her and her despicable fans. Payback time is on. Movie bombs and media calling her out are just the tip of the iceberg and the least she will endure.
.
Her behaviour is now publicly known., the mask is dropped. She is doomed for any decent man to be linked to. She has no love inside her, hence she can’t be loved just used and abused in successive bootey calls.

@massarelli: He get dumped more likely. Actors drop out from projects for many reasons.There is no woman right now a script re written for her from a man role . That is the power of Angie. People prefere to see angie than tommy girl. Have you heared he is doing the third similar movie with the same cameron diaz.lol

@killer bee: There is a reason the studios pay to woman like her the way they do. The reason must be important to them otherwise they won’t pay her and woman like her the way the do.

@mslewis:
.
>>>>>>>>>>>
.
LOL, I hope Goree gets made in January 2010. This means that pff will have 3 movies in the can by summer 2010. 3 movies to come out in the next 18 months. Can the public handle it? Talk about too much exposure!! YAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!
.
You know, part of pff’s problem is that pff NOW HAS a reputation for making mediocre to horrible movies.
.
Here are the rotten tomato scores for pff’s movies from 2005
.
RHI, 20%
Derailed 20%,
The Break Up 33%
Friends with money 70%
Marley 61%
HJNTITY, 43%
Mismanagement, 46%
sssshitttt happens, 18%
.
Not only are the critical scores BAD in pff’s movies, the critics rate pff’s acting in these movies as being OK to awful. No acting accolades for pff. More than one critic had said she slept walked through some of her performances.
.
In contrast Brad Pitt’s movie critical success resume from 2005 reads like this:
.
Mr and Mrs Smith 58%
Babel 68% (Oscar Best Picture Nominee)
Ocean’s 13 69%
TAOJJ 74%
TCCOBB 71% (Oscar Best Picture Nominee)
BAR 77%
IB 88%
.
Brad personally achieved much praise for his acting in Babel, TAOJJ (best actor award Venice Film Festival), TCCOBB (best actor nomination for GG and Oscar and BAFTA and SAG)
.
And Angelina’s score board from 2005 reads like this
.
Mr and Mrs Smith 58%
The Good shepherd 56%
AMH 77%
Beowulf 71%
Wanted 72%
Changeling 61%
.
Again glowing reviews of Angelina’s performance in AMH (SAG and GG best actress nomination) and Changeling (SAG, GG, BAFTA, Oscar best actress nomination).
.
In the last few years both Angelina and Brad have built up reputations for making interesting and good quality movies and pff is quite the reverse. Proof, as always, is the rotten tomato scores.
.
The public will tolerate one or 2 bad movies from an actor but 6 out of 8 of pff’s movies (3/4) in the last 5 years being ROTTEN???
.
Once a company or a brand gets a reputation for ROTTEN, well, a turn around is required. But is the Baster or the Bounty Hunter the movies to turn pff’s BRAND image of ROTTEN around or will they just SOLIDIFY pff’s ROTTEN IMAGE even further?
.
YAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! It’s gonna be fun to watch, one way or the other! But if SALT is a critical and BO success, expect pff’s twits to go totally ballistic whacking the computer!!

BTW just want to add, in deference to the comments that Angelina didn’t technically “act” in Kungfu Panda, i didn’t include it on the list of movies which were critical successes for Angelina in the last 5 years – even though Kungfu was heavily marketed by Angelina.
.
Now, I’m just wondering which fool is gonna say – “you can’t blame pff for making 6 bad movies out of 8 because she made more movies then Angelina and Brad”.
.
I just wonder who is gonna make my day :-)

LOLOLOL! Dear, ‘Not Impressed by JA,’ that was impressive – am bookmarking, because it is a keeper and a half. LMAO Might I add she also miscalculated when she didn’t pimp out her bought and paid for Emmy nod (her guest appearance was said to be by far the WORST of the 30 rock guest ‘stars,’ Salma Hayek was said to be stunned that Huvane greased some palms and got Manlesston a nod.) She could have least have tried to play the Emmy thing, and soaked up credit (undeserved) for her TV gig before the BIG BOMB of her movie, but Ms. ‘Desperately Wannabe ‘movie stah’ Aniston didn’t want to associate herself with teee veee before her movie promos and release…someone (Huvane) probably had her convinced she had a hit on her hands based on her name alone. Ahahahaahaha.
.
By the way, loser who keeps adding up Maniston’s numbers and getting 2 + 2 = 5, is so incredibly deluded it’s side splitting — books that have been on the NYT Bestseller lists for YEARS, and a big male comedy star to coattail on, does NOT make Maniston a box office draw. Calling her a bargain for the buck is also a misnomer, which is why she’s slipped from the top of the bargain heap as well. The industry knows who and what we’re dealing with, a parasitic loser who coattails on the backs of others and things – then claims credit.
.
Angelina Jolie is THE REASON people see the movies in which she stars in, not in spite of, like Maniston.
.
Muahahaha.
.
Oh, changing gears…saw Russell Crowe on ET tonight, they are garnering up press for the upcoming Robin Hood, and Julie Moran was on set – she interviewed him and Cate Blanchett (maid Marion) separately. What I found that was so astounding, is how Russell has changed his tactics. He is no longer the ornery, anger management prone douchebag. But is acting real down to earth and sweet. What made me smile was that at one point, his young toddlers on became part of the interview. He came out with a helmet and sword (just like Shi’!) a very cute boy, though with a scowl on his face like Russ used to have. Russell was holding him, and letting Moran ask the baby questions, then he had his son give Julie a big kiss – I swear the kid took up 90% of the interview. I thought to myself, if that had been Brad with any one of his kids – the press and haters would have been all over him for pimping them out. Another thing Russell said, when Julie joked, ‘oh I thought I was gonna get to see you in leather pants, I was promised leather pants,’ Russell purred, ‘Oh you can see my codpiece madam.’ Sure it was said jokingly, but again – had Brad Pitt said the same thing – it would have been a 4 alarm fire, and breaking news in every media outlet (‘Brad Pitt flirts with ET Reporter, Angie kicks him out – Brad to Run Off with ET newswoman!) LMAO Double standards I just thought I’d point out. That said, because Cate is in this, I’m hoping Robin Hood is a hit. Russell has dropped major poundage, and resembles his Gladiator character – and he is a good actor…here’s hoping he’s learned his lesson: When Brad Pitt turns sh*t down and bails in sheer disgust, you know the sh*t has gotten fcked up and trashed — use THAT as your bellweather Russell, and don’t go snapping up the roles he (and Ed Norton) are now telling you stinks to high heaven. LOL
.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/13/2009 at 5:47 am

Lylian,

.
SALT will be a commercial success AT LEAST. It’s 99.9999 % sure.

angie and charlize are good actresses… i like them both in a movie… what do you think?

Not impressed by JA @ 10/13/2009 at 6:02 am

LOL Cliniqua
.
You and me, both !

Not impressed by JA @ 10/13/2009 at 6:10 am

TWEET @ 10/13/2009 at 5:51 am angie and charlize are good actresses… i like them both in a movie… what do you think?

————————————–
As much as they are both beautiful and talented, i beleive that Charlize is better served in a co-star role and Jolie has too much charisma to be anything but a lead.
.
So yeah, i beleive that both in a movie will compliment each other very well and could constitute an amazing beautiful and talented stricking force with Jolie’s magnetic presence and Charlize ethearal one.
.
I can see them in a good suspensful thriller. I could even see them like switching hair color, Jolie in blond and Charlie in brunette.

massarelli @ 10/13/2009 at 1:38 am The movies Cruise dumps Angelina gets. Not sure that’s a good sign.
____________________________________

When the STUDIO HEAD goes on record to state that she HAS WANTED TO WORK WITH ANGELINA FOR YEARS and used this a her chance to do so AND REWROTE THE SCRIPT FOR HER, I think that’s a good sign.

When DIRECTORS try to write her DEAD CHARACTER back into a movie in order to sell it because the LEAD MALE STAR cannot do so alone, I think that’s a good sign.

para mi es una MENTIRA, y de nuevo usan el nombre de Angelina para promocionar otra peli, todavía no se estrena en la que hace de espía(y en esta va a ser una agente, muy similar no??) ya se nombraron como 3 o 4 en las que supuestamente trabajaría y lo que todos podemos comprobar en realidad es que Angelina cada vez filma menos(siempre dice que ese es su deseo y lo hace) para mi su próximo proyecto va a ser una PELICULA SERIA, COMPROMETIDA(al estilo A mighty heart)
Por dios, como usan a Angelina para vender revistas de chismes y de las otras, libros, pelis,etc., la verdad no deja de sorprenderme!!

pASSING gAS @ 10/13/2009 at 8:51 am

LOL, the trolls get stuPitter every day! Dumb, dumb dummies! I f@rt hard when I blow my trumpet because I am the biggest t.u.r.d. in the toilet!

the thing with the tourist is angelina is not directly replacing tom C in the tourst (if true)
sam worthington replaced tom C, and angelina in for charlize.

i can see why it looks like angelina is having Tom C sloppy seconds though. angelina can do better than the tourist, where she might even be a supporting part only

Oh PLEASE actors leave projects ALL THE TIME and others take on the role! Is it only sloppy seconds when Angie is attached. Jeeze, u ass_holes are something.

@CLINIQUA:

ITA………..now just to add another exemplification of the double standard; I refer to the photo of the peen type thing hangin’ outa x in the infamous recent papz shot.

Now I want you to sit back and just IMAGINE if that had been Angie photo’d with some piece of foreign anatomy hangin’ outa her cr*tch………armaeffinggeddon, the celebrity world rocked to the core, every tabloid, Angie undergoing gender reassignment surgery, Brad is gay, no more kids for the super couple.

But x, not an effing word from anyone except a few bloggers on pro JP sites. Makes me sick, actually, what publicist money can buy in Tinseltown.

the real lou @ 10/13/2009 at 10:30 am

# 436 ralston @ 10/13/2009 at 8:53 am …From what I understand,Angelina’s part (Cara) is the best character of the movie.Sam Worthington’s part (Frank) on the other hand is so-so.Which might explain why Tom Cruise dropped out.The movie sounds interesting.If Angelina take the part fine.If she turns it down I’m OK with that as well.Ultimately it’s Angelina’s choice.Actors/Actresse drop out of projects EVERYDAY in Hollywood.Haters only make a big deal out it when Angelina or Brad are involved.

As far as I know, nothing is confirmed by Angie or her agent.. I guess we find out when she promotes Salt early next year. They attached her name to Wanted 2 for the longest time but nothing come out of it. Like Brad said don’t believe everything you hear. IMO, if Angie takes this role, fine with me, I see her in any roles she’s in!!!!!!!!

the real lou @ 10/13/2009 at 10:39 am

# 440 lurking @ 10/13/2009 at 10:33 am ….. Like Brad said don’t believe everything you hear.

**************************************************************
I will just sit back and take the “wait and see” approach.I have noticed in the last 4+ years people like to attach Angelina/Brad’s names to get publicity for projects.

There is no need to compare Angie’s movies to Maniston’s sh*tty rom-rom movies. These two women are totally different. Maniston could never reach to Angie’s acting talent, looks, etc. Maniston doesn’t deserve to be compared to Angie – it is silly and Maniston does the same Rachel movie. How can you compare garbage (maniston’s movies) to feature films with substance (Angie’s movies)? It is not fair. So Maniston’s fans are delusional just like their idol…it is called stupid is as stupid does!

I can see Angie with Oscar nomination, but I can´t see anniston with a nomination.

http://videojuegosteam.blogspot.com/

Funny over the hag thread I just posted 3 comments to stir things up!!! It’s pretty much dead over there, no bet, ellie or jade to be found. Hmm, could it be? Could Bet take my advice and open the English book to learn how to write correctly. Could it be? One can only hope right.

@passby:

Anyone who matters in the flick industry knows the difference between an Oscar winning Actress, the most powerful celeb on the planet and they hype of a ‘celebrity’ in terms of cashing in on a name while it lasts.

They also know that unless she is co-starring in an ensemble she can’t open on her name or talent………….period. Even if she does get $$ to do this gory musical and get it in the can; she is still a long way from getting a distributor. No suit wants to score a lose on her back no matter how persuasive a pubicist she has. Money talks and she is not a ticket to profit on the big screen……..period. That has now been proven twice. It’s one thing to have a dog at the box office but still earn critical kudos for your performance……….she blows on both counts.

Other than Ellie and her parisitic twin, bet, no one is buying her “I am a movie star’ bullshite.

@dawne:

LMAO dawne, ‘gender reassignment,’ hahahaha – so true, that pic would have been on everything from ET to Inside Edition to SNL. That sh*t was nasty, and so was that floppy flabby inner thigh and smelly crotchetal area — I wanted to throw up, seriously. No wonder Brad’s wigglies stayed safe in their ball sac and double locked the door from the inside. Hahahahaha!!
.
By the way, speaking of ‘gender reassignment,’ I heard Charlize was playing wife to Nicole Kidman who is going to play the first man to woman transexual. No lie. It should be a hoot.

As to the gory musical (hahah, love that name) – if maniston were smart not interested in fantasizing about Oscars and golden globes, she’d simply produce the sh*t and get out of the way. The women in that prison and band, I read were not even 30 years old, most were in their mid twenties or younger. If she had a brain and no ego, she’d take her name off the marquee, cast Taylor Swift, Kristen Stewart and Carrie Underwood. Then wait to see if a top notch director would come on board. But this is maniston we’re talking about, and hysterically , she probably sees this as her Cathy Zeta Jones part and a way to get recognized in the industry. So odds are, it will be Maniston, and other no names who she feels won’t show her up in any way, shape, or form – which means, you’ll do a better job of scaring up talent and looks at your local dinner theater.

@Loves it: So I guess she slept with Matt Damon

@CLINIQUA:

LOL; Good cast selection; not a bad movie premise with the right mix and you are so right if she kept her big chin BEHIND the scenes (bad pun, I know) this script with the right casting, (big caveat) would likely be a winner. With her narcissistic spit all over it, it’s just another BOMB.

This hag has absolutely no self awareness…………stunted emotional growth is usually attributable to addiction or narcissism, or in her case, both. She already has a litany of scathing reviews with which to find enlightenment, but her palpable need to compete with Angie and Brad will surely over-ride that big ‘pink’ elephant in the room.

@WOW!: Vince almost mentioned he’s ready to be a father now

Kim, I’ve read that Vince did say he was ready to be a dad. His best pal Jon Favreau is a father of two – so I’m sure he wants to join that club in a bad way – and I wouldn’t be surprised if his fiance is pregnant now. Usually, when men start talking about it, it’s already a done deal, LOL (look at Brad telling larry King he and Angelina were ready for another child, when King came to New Orleans to interview him about MIR — Angelina was in her first trimester then). Good for Vince, am happy for him. he looked so miserable when he was pretending to be with Maniston, but hey – doesn’t everybody? lol

passby @ 10/13/2009 at 11:04 am

There is no need to compare Angie’s movies to Maniston’s sh*tty rom-rom movies. These two women are totally different. Maniston could never reach to Angie’s acting talent, looks, etc. Maniston doesn’t deserve to be compared to Angie – it is silly and Maniston does the same Rachel movie. How can you compare garbage (maniston’s movies) to feature films with substance (Angie’s movies)? It is not fair. So Maniston’s fans are delusional just like their idol…it is called stupid is as stupid does!

===========================

Passby, I totally agree with you, there is no comparison at all. Angie is in a class of her own. Maniston is useless as an actress, it is like comparing REAL DIAMOND with Zirconia or Crystals.

Gracie, try a coke bottle, ground into a fine powder and then mixed with paste, set atop a bubble gum machine style ring setting.

Cliniqua, I was distracted I meant to type Vince also mentioned not almost mentioned. I saw an interview he did w/ Enews talking about being ready to be a father.

dOROTHY sTReeT rESENT sHI Ppl @ 10/13/2009 at 1:16 pm

jjjb dorothe street is hung up on race !!
jjjb dorothe street care fore zahharra onle !!
jjjb ds is dum thankin dat cuase brad holds zahharra in fotos , zahharra is hiz favorit kid !! brad wiated yrs too make bio kids !!! shiloe an knot brad dulpikate !!! ppl kno dorothe pain in da azz !!!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
####################################################
wat hapens anglin da’nt get ethopien kid , dorothy !!!
zahharra luves shiloe !! u jelus !!! #######################################################
zahhara dulpikat
http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/11_03/DawitR2411_468x456.jpg

dOROTHY sTReeT rESENT sHI Ppl @ 10/13/2009 at 1:21 pm

jjjb dorothy street resent shi !!
jjjb dorothy street resent shi !!
jjb dorothy street resent tention too bio kids !!
jjb dorothy street bad lite hair ppl , zahharra anit infrior too bio kids !!
jjb dorothy street hung on race !!! Amen !!

Mama mia, here comes dottie streeeeeeeet again!!!

@groundcontrol:

Jennifer Connelly (love her) wasn’t in “The Incredible Hulk” shewas in “Hulk”. that was 6 years ago. Forbes is completely useless with this *****!

Freeeeeeeee ANGELINA @ 10/13/2009 at 2:31 pm

free ANGIE! Free Angie! Free Angie. I hope she does this movie for herself.
She said she wanted to take some time
off from acting and would maybe think about doing roles that she thinks are important. She took
WANTED because she said she needed
a Movie to have fun with after her Mom Passed away. The only reason she would have for taking The Tourist would be for fun because she is unhappy with PItt. PItt was supposed to go back to work but his movie hit the skids and so Angie has been stuck with him for Months. Angie must be tired of him and she needs to do the Tourist to escape from Pitt. why else would she do it?

credit jjb

ttp://www.peoplepets.com/news/celebrities/spotted-the-jolie-pitt-s-bulldog-gets-a-trim/1

Spotted: The Jolie-Pitt’s Bulldog Gets a Trim!

October 12, 2009

Vous parlez Francais, puppy? Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie’s family bulldog, reportedly named Jack, got the star treatment at a groomer in the southern town of Brignoles, France, on Monday. The roly-poly pup enjoyed a bath before getting a warm blowout from one of the staffers. Hey, when you belong to one of the most famous families in the world, you’ve gotta look good!

Learn more about the Jolie-Pitt’s precocious pup here.

IB Box Office Update @ 10/13/2009 at 2:45 pm

INGLOURIOUS ********

Domestic: $118,297,669 ( boxofficemojo.com as of Sunday )
Foreign: $156,267,277 ( uip-boxoffice.com )
***********************************************************************
WorldWide: $274,564,946

I think Megan Fox would be a good choice for this action movie. She is alot hotter than AJ and she doesn’t have six kids that need her attention. I understand that there are women who have multiple children who HAVE to work, but AJ made her decision to have children and she should be a hands on mother. Alot of people compare AJ and BP to Paul Newman and Joanne Woodward ( they were married, btw) but Joanne at least slowed down on her acting to be with the family. AJ is just so vain!

@reply | Flag This
# 455 dOROTHY sTReeT rESENT sHI Ppl

I posted a comment to you on the previous thread. I hope you read it. But if not, okay. You are either very young or very stupid, or very both. At any rate grow up and go away. Or go away and grow up. You need lots of attention from a medical professional. Peace

pASSING gAS @ 10/13/2009 at 2:56 pm

@IB Box Office Update: I have IBS too. Do you go to the doctor? Toot Toot!

@jp fan: Angelina Jolie’s family bulldog, reportedly named Jack, got the star treatment at a groomer in the southern town of Brignoles, France, on Monday. The roly-poly pup enjoyed a bath before getting a warm blowout from one of the staffers. Hey, when you belong to one of the most famous families in the world,
##############
At least one of the family bathes! Harhar! Stinkin hippy family!

credit jjb

London’s Frieze Art Fair does not open to the public until Thursday, but the preview for VIP buyers is tomorrow.

So we may get to see new pics of Brad in less than 24 hours.

http://friezeartfair.com/

Geraldine @ 10/13/2009 at 3:11 pm

Charlize is such a beautiful woman. About the other…….Let’s just say she is aging poorly.

You Angelina fanatics are LOONY. And I think it’s funny how you try to do anything to knock lovely, talented Charlize Theron to make Angelina look better. If angelina was so great you wouldn’t need to do that. Angelina’s box office appeal is overrated. She has yet to carry a film all by herself to a big hit. The only time was Tombraider and that already had a fanbase behind it from the video game. Salt will be very telling but I think people would rather read about her in tabloids than take her seriously as an actress. I mean she’s had several flops herself.

As for Charlize Theron, she is a beautiful and talented actress but she has said she doesn’t consider herself a movie star. So why all the box office talk? She’s like Laura Linney or Jeff Bridges and just chooses small films to challenge her and then she occasionally dabbles in box office fare. That’s admirable.

Why doesn’t Charlize have charisma exactly? Because she doesn’t ***** herself out to the press like Angelina? Seriously watch any interview with Charlize and Angelina. Angelina seems boring and like she takes herself too seriously. While Charlize is funny, charming and charismatic. She’s not a headlining star but she isn’t interested in that. She just wants to do roles that allow her to be more than a pretty face.

@zena:

Problem is, tool, MF cannot act!!! You idiots think any young thing with altered face and ten pounds of hair extensions, lip filler etc. is capable of being an Oscar winning actress. roflmao. There is ONE JOLIE, honey bunch…………..get over it, already. The Jolie’s and Hepburns come along every ‘generation’……….some little trash mouth Angie stalker ain’t one of them and never will be; she lacks the class, brains, talent and diversity…..just for starters.

Nice try, though, troll.

notice when the jenhags have nothing left the last resort of the desperate, clinging to life losers is to attack and stalk the JP fans. JP fans NEVER do that. Jenhags track when certain fans are online and take to stalking across blogs. Amazing in their relentless, crazed and demented minds. either that or Manny’s millions which has been used to enrich Huvane is also being diverted to fund paid internet saboteurs.

@olivia:

If that was Mickey Mouse next to Angie instead of Charlize, you’d be extolling the benefits of big ears. Your agenda is so transparent and you are boring us.

Geraldine @ 10/13/2009 at 3:11 pm

Charlize is such a beautiful woman. About the other…….Let’s just say she is aging poorly.

_________________________________________

i don’t think Chiniston is old. She’s only 5 or 6 years older than charlize. Ok, MANiston’s face is really old but i think she has a nice body. after all, she has all the time in the world to keep up her body but her face is too, too late to get it fixed. LMAO.

Jill is ill @ 10/13/2009 at 3:19 pm

Jenhags track when certain fans are online and take to stalking across blogs. ########################
Talk to Jill, she is relentless in her stalking of JA fans. It works both ways HAG. You gross sucker.

Geraldine @ 10/13/2009 at 3:21 pm

Angie needs to stay home and raise her children so they don’t have to suffer the “horrible” hollywood lifestyle that caused her so much pain.

olivia @ 10/13/2009 at 3:12 pm

are you saying Wanted was James McAvory or Morgan Freeman’s movie? I love Charlize too but when was her last BO hit? You don’t think Italian Job was her movie do you? Anyway, regardless if Angie or Charlize takes the role I will love them both as long as not MANiston.

The Jolie’s and Hepburns come along every ‘generation’……….

******************
How dare you compare Hepburn to M.a.n.g.i.e? Not even close, dreamer! Hepburn was classy, beautiful and elegant.

@olivia: And I think it’s funny how you try to do anything to knock lovely, talented Charlize Theron to make Angelina look better. If angelina was so great you wouldn’t need to do that. Angelina’s box office appeal is overrated.
**************************************
Well said, if Angie were such a beauty and talent than she would not need to be compared to Charlize, Aniston or HEPBURN. That is a JOKE.

responding to the freaks personally keep them here. so they must serve some purpose. what, i don’t know.

@Melanie:

You really need to take your stupid a ss off this site and return to FF.. the other fools are missing you..

@Melanie:

Whadya mean, HOW DARE I?

Listen fcukface, if you can’t take it get the hell off this thread!!!!!

You don’t belong here, Nipple Rider, even though that hasbeen has a dead thread……..just like her movie star career……….BWAAAHAHAHAH

Now git, troll.

You really need to take your stupid a ss off this site and return to FF.. the other fools are missing you..
******************
You don’t own this site, I will speak my mind. Why are you loons always pitting AJ against other women? Sounds like insecurity to me!

Geraldine @ 10/13/2009 at 3:21 pm

you need to get off this thread now because you might get very addicted to this person that you called old. i doubt ;you will get off and if you do I am sure you will come with a different. so, you might as well stay on here and have fun talking about angie who you love and admire so much.

@hag:

just more hits for Angie’s threads…………..they can’t promote x so what’s left? Trash Angie……….futile, but amusing. Must suck to be a fan of a dud with nothing but failure as far as the human eye can see. Even these parasites can’t come up with any excuses anymore…it is what it is………….over. And they are pizzed cuz THEY LOSE. Doncha just love it. Karma hits the b*tch and her spawn.

Melanie @ 10/13/2009 at 3:24 pm

like you really care about Kate Hepburn. actually, i prefer to compare angie to Audrey Hepburn & Sophia Lauren. Angie is a combination of them both.

@dawne: You git, you foul mouthed weasel! You fat a.z.z.ed. Jack-hole! See, I can be a scary puke too! :)

Why all the hate? Can’t people discuss things logically? Oh, I forgot, I am talking to loons. Of course not, just spew venom and hatred! Fun times!

Not impressed by JA @ 10/13/2009 at 3:46 pm

Melanie @ 10/13/2009 at 3:24 pm The Jolie’s and Hepburns come along every ‘generation’………. ****************** How dare you compare Hepburn to M.a.n.g.i.e? Not even close, dreamer! Hepburn was classy, beautiful and elegant.
————–

LOL, . How ignorant of you !
.
Hey idiot, Hepburn was the mistress of Spencer Tracy till he died ! . She lived with her lover, a married man for 20 years and heNEVER, EVER divorce for her and shared his time between her and his family, wife included !.
.
She had the decency of not coming to his funeral because his wife and children were there and didn’t want his mistress to be present ! A great actress but classy ? .

.
As for Audrey Hepburn she also had affairs with married men while married too.
.
She was a great actress and a great humanitarian. But a woman like anyone with her flaws
..
Next time you are shocked do your homeworck, hypocrit moron !

Audrey Hepburn carried on a decades long affair with a married man while she was in and out of two marriages. It was common knowledge in Hollywood. She lived with her lover for the last 9 years of her life openly in Switzerland and was involved in humanitarian work after her acting career had ended. She and Angelina are very alike. Angie obviously didn’t suffer the hardships of life in Europe during WW2 but both she and AH had Nazi fathers.

@CLINIQUA:

I agree with many of your comments.. I am a fan of Russell’s since LA Confidential. Love him in that and Gladiator, Beautiful Mind, and many more. He is a wonderful actor. And yes having kids has toned him down a great deal. I for one like the softer side of him. YES we all know there is a double standard.. but only as it relates to the JPs..

But hey the haters keep throwing stones and the JPs are not getting hit. And that is the bottom line.

Just a note. I like Charlize and I think she is a great talent. I would love for she and Angie to do something together. The haters want us to knock this woman and say ugly things about her.. WHY? Charlize and Angie are not enemies, nor are they in competition. Actors drop out of roles and other take them all the time. That is Show business.. nothing more..

I hope we fans don’t feel we have to trash someone like Charlize to defend Angie.. who needs no defense.. This is another example of the haters trying to create drama with EVERY WOMAN and Angeline.. who we all KNOW has never said anything NEGATIVE about anyone. Even though she is attacked all the time..

Let’s not take this bait.. Let them try and play this game with some other Actress. Angie is not playing the game.. and neither should the fans.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
.
Check it….
.
http://www.towleroad.com/2009/10/spooning-with-the-future.html
.
D-listed says this is for “the Jennifer Aniston in all of us.” OMG…am on the floor!! Bahahahahah! She is SUCH a joke now, it’s almost sad. I said ALMOST. Hee, hahaha, phew…she did it to herself.

Angie highest paid actress in Hollywood(Hollywood Reporter 2009),Most powerful Actress( Guiness Book of World Records 2009 and 2010)Most powerful celeb(Forbes),Vanity Fair most beautiful and highest ranking celeb on Establishment List.Oscar Winner 2000, Oscar, Golden Globe SaG and Bafta nominee 2009, pilot with US and British licenses,author UN ambassador and mother of 6.All accomplished at the age of 34,definitely in a league of her own.

Angie highest paid actress in Hollywood(Hollywood Reporter 2009),Most powerful Actress( Guiness Book of World Records 2009 and 2010)Most powerful celeb(Forbes),Vanity Fair most beautiful and highest ranking celeb on Establishment List.Oscar Winner 2000, Oscar, Golden Globe SaG and Bafta nominee 2009, pilot with US and British licenses,author UN ambassador and mother of 6.All accomplished at the age of 34,definitely in a league of her own.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/13/2009 at 3:55 pm

Melanie @ 10/13/2009 at 3:36 pm You really need to take your stupid a ss off this site and return to FF.. the other fools are missing you..
******************
You don’t own this site, I will speak my mind. Why are you loons always pitting AJ against other women? Sounds like insecurity to me!

——————–
You’re the stupid one and hypocrit at that !
.
You Maniston followers, worshipped a one dimensional woman who is a peadophile appologist who can’t be multitasking, hence you want every woman, Angie included to stay at home to raise childen only, like you, lazy neanderthalians r*tarded women who are there to consume the man’s money while raising kids while showing your total ignorance ….. totally mismatched with modern society.

@Melanie:

Listen, pond scum, slither back into the slime with the rest of the teeming bacteria and feed off your pus. Get the hell gone you sad excuse for a human being.

@dawne: Ok Dawn, erm, Jill, You fvckfaced sh!t maggot vomit festering p.e.n.i.s pu.ssing projective vomit head spinning exercist actress! Have a wonderful day!

yes, responding to the freaks personally may bring hits, but it degrades the thread which is the freaks’ agenda in the first place.

fans can refute and rebut lies without giving the hags due notice. refute a lie with the truth without quoting the hag who wrote the nasty lie. fans have the POWER to direct the thread NOT the freaks.

Angelina’s success is mostly due to her private and tabloid life and not much else. Before Brad Pitt she was considered box office poison. She got credit for films like Kung Fu Panda and Shark Tale and Beowulf where the success was nothing to do with her but had to do with the being the type of film audiences like to see.

The reason why she’s being called the most powerful celebrity is ONLY because of her tabloid exposure. These days it’s a shame that’s how they measure stardom is by tabloid exposure.

Will Smith is the only one who is true powerful movie star in the old hollywood since of drawing people to see anything he’s in.

Charlize Theron is not a powerful movie star but only a powerful actress. Same with Kate Winslet, Meryl Streep, and Laura Linney. And I prefer that to people who don’t show range in their work.

Years from now it’s the good film work that will last not the tabloids.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/13/2009 at 4:43 pm

IB daily figures : UPDATED
*****************************

Domestic: $118,442,404 ( boxofficemojo.com)
Foreign: $156,267,277 ( uip-boxoffice.com )
————————————————————–
WorldWide: $274,709,681

i will be in line the first weekend when Salt premiers. if it has a premier in Los Angeles, I will definately be there. i still kick myself because i could have been at the Changeling premier here but i was put off by the traffic.

Angelina did not carry Wanted by herself. That’s what a true star does. That’s what Julia Roberts did in the 90s. That’s what Jodie Foster did with Contact, Panic Room, and Flightplan. That’s what the likes of Bette Davis did in the old days. Wanted was a film that just appealed to people who like action films.

A true box office star will draw you into anything they star in. Will Smith can do a drama like the Pursuit of Happiness and draw people. Angelina has had more flops than hits and she did not even open Changeling well. I still think people are more interested in her tabloid life.

That’s why I prefer Charlize. To me the most effective actors and screen stars have mystery. If you have your whole life on display and say private things to the public all the time, it makes it hard for people to buy you in your roles. Overexposure is a bad thing for an actor and pretty soon Angelina Jolie may go the way of Demi Moore where she might seem like THE star of our time but soon fades and goes spends time with her children after too much publicity.

You people are comparing her to Audrey Hepburn and it only makes people look at you funny. Angelina is charismatic in action parts (though not anywhere else IMO) but she doesn’t have that IT that Audrey had. Lots of people I know love Charlize Theron after Monster and are annoyed by Angelina Jolie.

fivehead wow… w/c head of yours are talking the maggot one?…ic.

on topic, i don’t think jolie is like any actresses of the past era or even the one that is still there today. maybe they are similar in some ways but not totally . i would say jolie is fierce,wild, tough,gunslinger,pilot,biker,butt-kickcker, daredevil, tattoed and a bit of a punk kid in the earlier days and still is even today ,though i must say been tamed. those famous actresses mentioned only shares her glamour,elegance,sexiness and depth in acting besides audrey hepburn who shares with her humanitarianisn , but she don’t all the angelina aspects, that’s why angelina jolie is in a league of each own today or tommorrow. while we can compare all famous actresses about their life achievements and heydays , it will take time and new generation to come up with another jolie ,perhaps one of her daughter who knows or maybe nothing at all. i can see that there’s nothing really different pattern from those famous actresses before except for audrey hepburns humanitarianism.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/13/2009 at 4:58 pm

Yeah hags, keep telling that to yourself if it can comfort you ! lol.
.
It’s not like those professionals who pay her that amount of money and want her to be in their movies, or that survey made in the time of WANTED was made asking people why what was the main reason why they went to see the movie (number 1, 60+ % was because of Jolie …too bad for you lol, the rest splitted among other reasons, the second main one being the type of movie).
.
It’s not like you Maniston fans, fans of the ultimate loser in Hollywood who can’t even mobilize her fans to watch her romcoms en masse, aka, the easiest product she isfamous for , it’s not like your OPINION hold any credibility….”losers withourt a cause” but whining and lying to yourself in order to get more comfort….i can feel your pain. Must suck to be at the side of the loser when you are the main reason why she is a loser when you can’t even support her movies but whine endlessly about other successful movies….ahahahaha

tany how about your idol aniston?…..she is?.

oh i know , you will make excuses, but tany no matter how you scream , jolie is way powerful than she even attracted your b.u.t.t. to post a comments here. i mean you lick her fine azz. how do i say this, your not an angie fan , yet you post here?……i get it you’re one of a jolie b.u.t.t. lickers- may i see high to your other ilks ie. sally/ellie/jade.

than= that
high = hi

rumors is all the tabloids have. angie and charlize rivalry…..those trashoids are scraping the bottom. the bottom-feeders will use any lie, diversion, rumor, even a whiff of a scent to scavenge angelina’s name. THE POWER OF THE JOLIE.

@CLINIQUA:

Clinique, that was halirious. they made a vibrating pillow for the ” Loney Emblem” LOL Other than sleeping with Norman, a vibrator and this pillow, poor Jenho is such a loser.

I just love it, everyone is making jokes about Jenho , lack of a love life.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/13/2009 at 5:13 pm

Will Smith is the only one who is true powerful movie star in the old hollywood since of drawing people to see anything he’s in.
—————–

That’s partially true.
.
Will Smith last movie didn’t bring many people in the theaters and the one he was nominated for was a bomb. ALI was one of the finest movie he did and paople didn’t watch it
.
Will changed the direction of his career when he went consistently into big productions movies. I remembered two years ago him saying that he hoped he won’t do those movies as much when he hit 40 and that he rather do movies like the one he did : Seven Pounds which only generated a little less than 70 M domestically.
.
So i beleive Will’s power is real but also grossely trumped by the big productions he made. When he will consistently hit 100 M with dramas movies then you can talk about having true power.
.
Will is in the same type of career path like Arnold Shwarzzenegger or Sylvester Stallone were. they tried to go out of it and most of the time failed miserably..
.
Those who are versatile don’t necessary make big money everytime, but they build a more loyal and bigger fanbase while stretching their longevity.

@Not impressed by JA:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Lets not compare Audrey Hepburn with AJ are you kidding.. your right though Audrey Hepburn did have class.

Kiki, this is why Angelina fanatics are lame. They think anyone who doesn’t worship at the altar of Angelina is a fan of Jennifer Aniston. I don’t give a damn about Jennifer Aniston.

I don’t hate Angelina I just am not in love with her like some of you are where you would compare her to Audrey Hepburn. I think she’s overexposed and overrated.

WTF does Jennifer Aniston have to do with this topic? I never even mentioned her before this post! Is that what you fanatics do on every post is bring up Jennifer Aniston? That’s just weird.

Well I think Charlize owns Angelina and Aniston. Maybe not in celebrity tabloid appeal but in every othe area.

i agree about will smith..he has talent but also,he is really the only black man who has been cast in a role originally slotted for a white male.

Will, hopefully can break into true dramas, but with hollywood, if you don’t break early, you will be type cast. maybe it is changing.

Notimpressedbyja I’m talking about TODAY. Look at Will Smith’s recent track record with everything from drama, to romantic comedy to action: Hitch, I Am Legend, Hancock, The Pursuit of Happiness, I Robot, Seven Pounds. Just back to back hits!

If Angelina was as powerful a movie star as some of you make her out to be Changeling and A Might Heart would have been much bigger hits.

And to give her box office credit for films like Kung Fu Panda and Beowulf is ridiculous. The success of that had nothing to do with her.

Personally I don’t think ANY actress today, not Charlize, not Aniston, not Angelina has true movie star power to draw people over and over again just to see them in anything. Julia Roberts used to have it, not anymore. And no one has that since unless they star in lame romantic comedies or generic action franchises.

Movie stars are becoming extinct and people are going to see films for their genre not for the stars in them like the old days of Cary Grant or Jimmy Stewart or Audrey Hepburn.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/13/2009 at 5:28 pm

hag @ 10/13/2009 at 5:07 pm rumors is all the tabloids have. angie and charlize rivalry…..those trashoids are scraping the bottom. the bottom-feeders will use any lie, diversion, rumor, even a whiff of a scent to scavenge angelina’s name. THE POWER OF THE JOLIE.
————————
Now that Megan Fox’s movie is out of the top 20 and garner 15 M only, they can’t play wanna be baby Angie against the queen.
.
Nit a good thing to play Jolie against Theron cause as much as she is talented and beautiful, her fan base is too tiony and she doesn’t have BO success to rely on.
.
Remebered, they used that criterion with Megan Fox saying she will replace Angie who is old history and dumped the girl like a toilet paper when she failed in her first test with her latest flick.
.
Hollywood can make you and unmake you as quick ,especially when you are a young starlet.

# 500 olivia @ 10/13/2009 at 4:47 pm

yeah, james and morgan made the movie a hit not angie and you are a fcuking idiot. Oh! i forgot Common made the movie a hit too.

Passing Through @ 10/13/2009 at 5:32 pm

# 426 lylian @ 10/13/2009 at 5:12 am @mslewis:
.
Here are the rotten tomato scores for pff’s movies from 2005
.
RHI, 20%
Derailed 20%,
The Break Up 33%
Friends with money 70%
Marley 61%
HJNTITY, 43%
Mismanagement, 46%
sssshitttt happens, 18%
.
++++++++++++++++++++
.
Damn. I could use my cell phone to make a movie about the people I see in Wal-mart and it’d get a better score than this. Well…as long as X wasn’t in it, that is…

Pokeman, she didn’t carry the film and the genre made the movie a hit you idiot. Not any actor. Just like Shia Lebouf didn’t make Transformers a hit and just like Tobey Maguire didn’t make Spiderman films a hit. These genre films have their own built in audience.

If Angelina was truly the most powerful star her box office returns should have been a hell of a lot better for a film like Changeling.

You people forget before the Brad Pitt stuff she was considered box office poison. Only reason she’s not anymore is because she’s in some films like Kung Fu Panda and Beowulf with success that has little do with her and she’s in the tabloids all the time.

There are no true box office stars these days unless we’re talking about Will Smith, so people measure your star power by tabloid coverage.

not impressedbyja, just because Charlize doesn’t go around acting like media ***** and making headlines all the time doesn’t mean Megan Fox and Angelina Jolie are better than her! Megan Fox is just this years Jessica Alba. She’s the flavor of the month.

You’re right you can’t compare Charlize to those because she keeps her private life private and IS very respected for her acting and beauty. You just trying to insult Charlize in your own passive way to make Angelina better but I don’t think Angelina being the tabloid thing is a badge of honor.

I’ll take great acting, and mystery anyday over that.

with the likes of kim kardashian and her ilk becoming “celebrity’ these days… true movie stars are lacking. brad pitt, angelina jolie, matt damon, jonny depp, george clooney , julia roberts, reese witherspoon, cameron diaz, and to a lesser degree, bruce willis ,tom cruise, drew Barrymore.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/13/2009 at 5:47 pm

Olivia,, my dear Maniston fan, aka the fan of the biggest mediaHO ever who can’t even bring her a** to Maniston or Charlize’ latests flick.
.
What made you think that with such a resume your opinion hold any credibility ?
.
Nothing you can say is valid. You are fans of artists who have consistant bombs. One is a mediaHo, the other not, one has a big Chin, the other is a stunner. Facts are : one has few fans, the other has stupid fans who don’t support her.
.
Game, set and match !

the real lou @ 10/13/2009 at 5:47 pm

# 500 olivia @ 10/13/2009 at 4:47 pm

# 511 olivia @ 10/13/2009 at 5:28 pm

# 515 olivia @ 10/13/2009 at 5:35 pm

# 516 olivia @ 10/13/2009 at 5:39 pm

********************************************************
One has to wonder….why is everyone arguing with this troll?If she thinks Charlize Theron is the best thing since sliced bread,that is her opinion.Frankly I’m sick of reading her repetitive posts.Haters just want to argue.I take it the X thread is dead?

Passing Through @ 10/13/2009 at 5:48 pm

# 462 zena @ 10/13/2009 at 2:48 pm
# 468 olivia @ 10/13/2009 at 3:12 pm
.
Oh joy. The female-name changing troll is back…

Hmmm, didn’t know there are SOOOO MANY Charlize fans all of a sudden. I could have sworn her threads couldn’t even reach Page 2. Just like there were many Thais, religious folks, child experts, hair experts etc who just happen to post at any Angelina/Brad thread …

yes, you are right. ONLY the genre make the movie a hit. all the action/adventure/fantasy/sci-fi/horror that were BO hits because of the Genre not the actors/actresses.

I wonder what kind of genre are I.Robot, I am Legend and Hancock. I guess they were drama because Will Smith’s acting was fantastic. His acting in those 3 movies better than ALI and Pursuit of Happiness which made 600 mil.

btw, you are comparing spiderman, transformers to Changeling which was a Rated R movie. you are a fcuking idiot.

Passing Through @ 10/13/2009 at 5:53 pm

# 500 olivia @ 10/13/2009 at 4:47 pm
.
STFU and get back under your rock.

the real lou @ 10/13/2009 at 5:55 pm

# 500 olivia @ 10/13/2009 at 4:47 pm ….Angelina has had more flops than hits and she did not even open Changeling well.

********************************************************
This person is just a X fan looking for an argument.BTW I take it you haven’t looked at Ms Theron’s box office record?Flops would be a understatement.Oh and The Burnng Plain opened well?LOL.

i don’t like angie

Observer2 @ 10/13/2009 at 5:58 pm

olivia @ 10/13/2009 at 5:35 pm
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Olivia, go bob for some apples. Or go get Bobbed. One or the other.

pASSING gAS @ 10/13/2009 at 6:00 pm

He who smelt it delt it, if you can’t take the stink get out of the bathroom! Wipe, flush and walk away you trolls!

oh sure hepburn has class , so is jolie and you are a classic evil witch who will trumped a dead person just to defend your beloved jen. i would say jennifer has class even she was been linked from john mayer,vince vaugh and etc. i would also say , jen spreading naked w/ a tie in GQ spread around bunch of naked twenties oogling her down below is a pure CLASS.

olivia/ellie/tanie/melanie , just go watch charlize movie okay. but for the meantime keep on licking jolie’s azz , ssure she is one fine gem. you can keep all mention all the actresses and actors but in reality , most are talking about jolie not the others – yes they are all great in their own.

olivia/ellie /tany/melanie

if jolie is a box office poison , can’t carry a movie or not powerful ; may i ask why they are offering her good movies?, in wanted why they paid her more than mcavoy and why she is on the billboard alone? why did the producer asked her to replace tom cruise in salt and re-wrote the script just for her ?………did it happen to any other actors in history? – it’s very ironic because she ddn’t even have a publicist but just a long time manager, what a shame. oh i know jolie should hire huvane , she needs him badly.

olivia darling, here is Will Smith’s hits.

Ali – made 88 mil – production budget 107 mil
Changeling made 113 mil – PB 55 mil
AMH – made 19 – PB 16mil
POH – made 300 mil – PB 55mil

Will did well in POH but that doesn’t mean he is not a failure in the BO as well.

both got nominated for an Oscar for best acting but didn’t win

Olivia, You have a great point. There are no Audrey Hepburns anymore. The studios used to manage the PR of the talent. Now they are managed independantly and some become overexposed because of their own massive ego’s. Tabloids can now make or break a career, no matter how fanatical a stars fan base. Don’t even argue with crazy. I just wanted to tell you that I agree with your comments.

Good avternoon to all BAMPZSKV fans. I hope everyone is having a great day. Hi irma, embo, Passing Through, Cliniqua, guli, vickiefromtexas, bresieses, jill, and anyone I missed. Peace

pASSING gAS @ 10/13/2009 at 6:14 pm

Good avtermoon you fanz! I see pootie and whatsthatsmell and goopiemess and t.u.r.d are all here! Cheers!

well, according to olivia Angie was on the billboard because she is a favorite of the tabloids. that was funny.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/13/2009 at 6:18 pm

And just before the brilliant ALI, there were the good “Legend of Bagger Vance” featuring Will Smith and Charlize theron.
.

Domestic: $30,919,168 78.4%
+ Foreign: $8,540,259 21.6%

——————————————————————————–

= Worldwide: $39,459,427
.
Investment cost : $80,000,000
.
.
After those two movies, Will took consistently all the big productions entertaining, action movies and even admitted that he doesn’t enjoy them as much as real movies like ALI and hoped that at 40 he will do more of the likes of ALI which he said are real acting type of movies.
.
The only drama who was a block buster is ”The Pursuit of Happyness’

Hi there, dina#1. How are you? As you can everything is same-o, same-o here at Jared’s. Fans have been peacefullyu discussing the possibility of Angie being in The Tourist, then the trolls/jenhens/fanistons invaded the thread. Like always …

Observer2 @ 10/13/2009 at 6:20 pm

LMAO! A tabloid reader is here and giving them way too much credit. If the press was as invasive in Audrey Hepburn’s time, just like with JFK, they would have been called out for their behavior.

As it was, it was known, just not written about by the press, at the time.

Zena @ 10/13/2009 at 6:08 pm
Olivia

good god, you are agreeing with yourself. talk about crazy.

kiki, they offer Nicole Kidman movies still and she’s the epitome of box office poison today isn’t she? I’m not saying Angelina is any diferent. No actress since Julia Roberts up until Erin Brockovich has had true box office drawing power as a movie star.

Jolie is a hot star mostly because of her tabloid attention.

But it’s no use arguing with you deluded fanatics. You think her crap smells like roses and no one can compare to your goddess or say a negative thing about her. It’s useless even pointing out facts to you.

Buh bye. I’d rather see Meryl Streep onscreen anyday anyway. Was she regarded a box office queen during her brilliant run of brilliant performances in the 80s? No but that’s why she has such a long career because made it off pure talent not exploiting her private life. I think it’s smart for actresses like Charlize Theron and Kate Winslet to follow the same path. Fame is so fickle and fleeting. True talent will stay. I can’t think of a single Angelina Jolie film that will be remembered well years from now when the press have moved on to another tabloid focus.

Observer2 @ 10/13/2009 at 6:24 pm

Not impressed by JA @ 10/13/2009 at 6:18 pm
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I remember Will Smith saying on 60 Minutes that he sat down with his manager because he wanted to be the biggest movie star in the world and how they’d go about doing it. The types of movies that made a lot of money were action movies and movies about Aliens.

He said after he had a few flops, The Wild Wild West being one of them,, he got scared and that’s when he agreed to do Men In Black II and Bad Boys II.

His formula has worked, for the most part, so I have to give him props for that.

thank you zena. I was beginning to think I was lost in a nuthouse. ha ha. You’re right you can’t argue with these people. And I find it funny how I blatantly pointed out Will’s recent string of box office hits and this person can only bring up a film that was made nearly a decade ago. Let’s not talk about all Angelina’s flops pre-Mr and Mrs Smith shall we? lol.

angie fan @ 10/13/2009 at 6:25 pm

alex l WHO CARES? ANgie is the best and Brad knows it. They have a beautiful family and lots of people who wish this family well. These same people do not wish any harm to JA. They just wish she would move on and maybe her fans would too. I hear JA and JM are back on. That would be good her her.

LOL, what an idiot – watch as I take her to school…
.
olivia @ 10/13/2009 at 4:47 pm Angelina did not carry Wanted by herself.
.
sorry last time I looked, James McAvoy couldn’t open a film, and neither could Morgan 80 yr old Freeman – Angelina sold ‘Wanted,’ and everyone knows it — the media and the industry proclaimed it so, when it made 51 mil opening weekend and they all called it HER film (where were you, under a rock?? hahahah) — that’s why the powers that be will kill to have her in the sequel — she was all over the trailers, promos, and posters (no lone yellow lab w/ big red bow) — hell even the industry knows Maniston’s gig is up, right before sh*t happens released, it was Aaron Eckhart who was all over the trailer. Once again, maniston passing the buck on her failures to her co-stars.
.
That’s what a true star does. That’s what Julia Roberts did in the 90s. That’s what Jodie Foster did with Contact, Panic Room, and Flightplan. That’s what the likes of Bette Davis did in the old days. Wanted was a film that just appealed to people who like action films.
.
Oh, so now every action film that gets made is a hit? Really?? Tell that to Gerard ‘Gamer’ Butler, or Johnny ‘Dillinger’ Depp, or Charlize ‘Aeon Flux’ Theron or Mark ‘Hitman’ Wahlberg (or whatever fck movie he just came out with) – sorry, but FAIL.
.
A true box office star will draw you into anything they star in. Will Smith can do a drama like the Pursuit of Happiness and draw people. Angelina has had more flops than hits and she did not even open Changeling well. I still think people are more interested in her tabloid life.
.
That’s a wack theory, especially since when she opened Lara Croft to the biggestbox office actioner ever with a female lead and broke records, there was no hyper tabloid/blog culture as there is today – the film made almost 400million, and made Angelina an international star, but winning her Oscar had put her on the map 1 year before — all this happened before Brad, ‘the triangle,’ and the tabloid cultures was a twinkle. Sorry, but FAIL again.
.

That’s why I prefer Charlize. To me the most effective actors and screen stars have mystery. If you have your whole life on display and say private things to the public all the time, it makes it hard for people to buy you in your roles. Overexposure is a bad thing for an actor and pretty soon Angelina Jolie may go the way of Demi Moore where she might seem like THE star of our time but soon fades and goes spends time with her children after too much publicity.
.
yeah, I guess the overexposure was so bad for Angelina, she got nominated for her SECOND Oscar just this year, and her 5th Golden Globe and 4th SAG award — hahahaha, shut up you jealous cow. Your irrational resentment and nonsense posts are scary. Also, the last time I checked, the only way Angelina would go the way of Demi is if she could turn back time and be a soap opera star married to Bruce Willis who had never been nominated (or thought of) as a first rate actress -since Angelina has almost every acting accolade in the business, and is the biggest superstar of our time – being Demi is not possible. Pick someone else…Elizabeth taylor maybe?
.
As far as Charlize having mystery – BAHAHA!! Sorry, nothing against Charlize – but Charlize has discussed every relationship she’s ever been in, discussed her Mom killing her Dad, talks about sex, smokes weed, and her entire life story is there for anyone to peruse thru — she’s been in the same mags and rags as Angelina has, only diff is…SHE CAN’T SELL THEM and NO ONE CARES. It’s the Hilary Swank syndrome. She’s a good actress with zero charisma. She could walk down the street at the height of rush hour in Times Square and people wouldn’t be bothered to care. They’d trample Charlize to get to Sarah Jessica. Sorry but thems there the facts.
.

You people are comparing her to Audrey Hepburn and it only makes people look at you funny. Angelina is charismatic in action parts (though not anywhere else IMO) but she doesn’t have that IT that Audrey had. Lots of people I know love Charlize Theron after Monster and are annoyed by Angelina Jolie.
.
Hahahahaha!! Are you on crack? Angelina is IT, and has been IT for longer than anyone acting today. Put down the pipe. Megan Faux couldn’t even last 8 months as an IT, Charlize theron was IT for 3 seconds back in the late 90′s. Angelina won her Oscar at 23, broke world records and box office at 24, and has been on a constant setaedy ascension into legendary status ever since – most say she’s already there. No one compares to her. Her star is already bigger than Audrey’s ever was – fame wise, and she has many more acting accolades under her belt as well.
.
.
Get a life loser. LOLOLOL

“well, according to olivia Angie was on the billboard because she is a favorite of the tabloids. that was funny.”

DUH! Are you naive or what? If Angelina is the focus of every single headline and attention in the media, obviously studios are going to use that image to sell it. Wake up. Maybe if other actresses blabbed to the press about their sex lives and dark side and hooked up with the most famous heartthrob in hollywood, they would get that amount of attention too.

But her image sells more tabloids then movie tickets, I can tell you that.

@ellie’:

actually, Jenhag, as much as I adored AH, the Jolie is much more of a modern day woman; Audrey epitiomized the post war ideal female, Jolie is today’s idealized empowered woman who can have it all and do it all. I know you can’t relate with x as an idol, but we smarter, deeper people, do.

I admired Audrey’s beauty and uniqueness as an actress, but I admire Angie for much more than her beauty and talent, I love her machismo. The fact that she carves her own path in life, does not conform as a need for acceptance, is humble and nice despite the fact that she has more right to diva behaviour than those that are. I love her bravery and non-traditional choices plus much much more.

She has achieved all that Audrey did career wise and philanthropically as well. They are unique beauties recognized all over the world. Iconic. Admired. Envied.

So give it up, nipple riders, yes, Jolie is in the same league as AH and JA is in a LEAGUE OF HER OWN………LITTLE LEAGUE.

bye bye olivia! just go away and join the other freaks over there at your homebase aka female first.

pokemon, how hilarious that you think there could only be ONE person in the world to have common sense to see other than outside of Angelina Jolie’s rear end.

I feel sorry for you people. This is like the ultimate Angelina lunatic resting place. It’s hilarious. I’m laughing so hard at your posts. The Audrey Hepburn ones sealed the deal.

Thanks for the laughs. Maybe someday you’ll grow and realize that tabloid fame is so shallow and fleeting. And the smart ones with real staying power keep their private life private and don’t blab about their sex lives to strangers and don’t try to put on some “dark image” for the press.

And maybe you’ll realize there have been and are more beautiful and talented actresses in the world than Angelina. She only knows how to provoke the media. That doesn’t make her better than anyone else.

BYE!

the real lou @ 10/13/2009 at 6:34 pm

# 538 olivia @ 10/13/2009 at 6:22 pm …..But it’s no use arguing with you deluded fanatics. You think her crap smells like roses and no one can compare to your goddess or say a negative thing about her. It’s useless even pointing out facts to you.

*****************************************************************

Yet you are STILL here over 2 hours later,LOL.Like I said,the X thread must be dead.

the real lou @ 10/13/2009 at 6:38 pm

# 547 mariam @ 10/13/2009 at 6:33 pm http://www.tmz.com/2009/10/13/brangelinas-dog-ruff-life/

their dog is so cute

**********************************************
TMZ posted a story about the Jolie-Pitt dog?How freaking sad.They will post anything about Angelina/Brad to get hits won’t they?(shaking head)

Baster and Bounty—–> 2 BOMBS in the making. I can’t wait.

wait a minute…OLIVIA was X’s name in FRIENDS WITH MONEY!!!

“As far as Charlize having mystery – BAHAHA!! Sorry, nothing against Charlize – but Charlize has discussed every relationship she’s ever been in,”

EVERY RELATIONSHIP? Let’s not distort things. Really? The ONE boyfriend she’s had for the past 9 years. lol.

” discussed her Mom killing her Dad”
That came out on its own so she had to acknowledge it. It’s very low of you to use that to attack her considering that was such a traumatic event in her life that she tried for the longest to cover up by saying he died in an accident!

“, ad her entire life story is there for anyone to peruse thru”
How would you know that? She has said she has been through a lot of things she won’t talk about to the public.


— she’s been in the same mags and rags as Angelina has, only diff is…SHE CAN’T SELL THEM and NO ONE CARES. ”

IAnd that’s a compliment! Who wants to be a tabloid diva? It’s a tacky place to be! It’s all calculated obviously. Believe me if Charlize wanted to be a tabloid diva she could be one. Anyone could these days! Look at freaking Jon and Kate plus 8, Paris Hilton, Jessica Simpson. Is that a good place to be when you want to be taken seriously as an actress?

Charlize could have easily dumped her less famous beau and hooked up with a more famous and popular man and gotten attention too. And she does not flaunt her private life the way Angelina and Megan Fox do so obviously the tabloids leave her alone for that reason. What don’t you get about that?

And she does get paparazzi attention, last time I checked. And I don’t see how it’s a positive thing. I’m pretty sure an actress like Laura Linney won’t send people trampling over her but does that make Angelina Jolie better than her? Hell no.

It’s funny and shows how shallow you people are that you measure tabloid exposure to use to say Angelina is better than someone. You think that’s what makes her so great. Pathetic.

Charlize is beautiful and was discovered in a bank. AJ is here because her dad is Jon Voight, and she has had MUNDO plastic surgery. Back in the day the woman held themselves to a higher standard. The reason AJ is so disliked is because she is talentless and trashy. And no, I am not a Aniston fan, but I love Charlize.

@the real lou:

i guess… even their dog is followed by the paps but taking pics of their trash in berlin still worse

what is Friends with Money? A Jennifer Aniston film? LMFAO! You people are so immature and lame. Did I not say that I don’t even like Jennifer Aniston? In your little deluded world you think that anyone who doesn’t worship Angelina has to be a Jennifer Aniston fan.

I don’t give a damn about the Team Jolie or Team Aniston thing. That’s just a way for losers to vent their issues from depending on whether they were cheated on or they simply just like to follow whatever tabloids tell them.

Give me real actresses like Meryl Streep, Jodie Foster, Cate Blanchett, Kate Winslet, Charlize Theron, Laura Linney, Naomi Watts, anyday.

Ofcourse you Angelina lunatics will just say Angelina is so much better than them because of her tabloid exposure. Right…

Not impressed by JA @ 10/13/2009 at 6:50 pm

Hey Jenhen turned overnight Charlize super fans, a question for you :

.
Were you among the few people who participate in the WEEKLY raising of $12,748 of the 21th day latest flick : BURNING PLAIN. Which officially generated : $161,897 in 22 days ?
.
I mean since you admitted the lady is your fan and generate money in movies, i want to know if you were among those who generated an average daily $1,600 for the past 8 days ?
.
I mean as supporters who like to convince other people, you should support her , right ? I bet Ellie and her likes were among the 10 people a day and per theater who went seeing Charlize’s movie.
.
And since you like to share your expertise about investment, revenues, wages and actors, i suggest you put your money where your mouth is and go watch the movie 100 times each of you. Therefore Charlize will get some bankable credbility based on figures and will ger a rise as she is offered the big roles you all say she deserve.

Observer2 @ 10/13/2009 at 6:51 pm

olivia @ 10/13/2009 at 6:42 pm
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
You’ve said bye how many times now? Let the door smack you in the a$$ on the way out.

Angelina is on the cover of tabloids because of you jen hens.You are the consumer of the lies spread about Angelina.
We Angie fans hate tabloids and would never touch them.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/13/2009 at 7:01 pm

Vic @ 10/13/2009 at 6:43 pm Charlize is beautiful and was discovered in a bank
——————————–
Charlize was a model who went out from racist South African apartheid regime when her mother shoot down her father in front of her and decided that it was better to let her teen daughter go to Italy to become a model than face the family tragey.

.
There are even vids at that time where she already said in her little cute accent that she wanted to become an actress
.
Then she went to Paris then London and fell in love with another wanna be actor. After a few months they both decided to go to LA where she as an aspiring actress got an agent and begin casting while still modelling at times.
.
She wasn’t discovered. No South African who needs a green card goes to Hollywood after two other continents to be an actress is hasardously discovered. Nice try though !

.
As for Jolie, she was estranged from her father, was an Elite model and went to Lee Strasberg for a few months and was smart enough to choose drama movies where she belittled her looks than the easy starlet route dropping her last name in the process.

Angie knows how to provoke you too becuase you park your @ss here all the time. thank for being a fan.

is good to know that i made you laugh. please don’t laugh yourself to death ok. we need angie’s fan alive. i am sure you will be back you name changing troll.

Observer2 @ 10/13/2009 at 6:51 pm

LMAO. no, olivia or name changing troll will not leave because angie already owns her @ss or as olivia said provoke her @ss to stay here 24/7.

Caribbean @ 10/13/2009 at 7:17 pm

It really gets on my nerves when I see it written that “this” actress is so private and “that” actress does not have her life out there while saying that Angelina is not private and people know everything about her ……NOT TRUE.

Angelina is researched and watched unlike anyone I have ever heard of. Other actresses are not as watched and researched as she is. Many other actresses are in many cases ALLOWED to be private because if it is not the PAPS not too much is questioned about them.

It is to Angelina’s credit that as she make these list (Forbes, Vanity, Guinness, Times, etc) she is not out leveraging these by: taking and making movie after movie; going to parties and fashion shows; and every gala being held.

NOTE: As soon as some movie star gets a hit movie how quickly 2 or 3 more new movies are made in rapid succession ……and how much you “find” out about them….

Fivehead @ 10/13/2009 at 4:00 pm
@dawne: Ok Dawn, erm, Jill,
***********************************************************************************

Thanks for the compliment, you stupid cúnt, but I’m not dawne.
.
Ciao, everybody. You can deal with these freaks. I’m gone.

If rabid hens spent as much time supporting ole lonely girl and her movies as they do stalking Angelina jolie, then Whiny Jen and her PR flack would not be going through desperate measures to keep ole devastated girl relevant. AJ is the gold standard. All whiny hens/fake fans of other actresses line up and whine. AJ owned your sorry asses.

According to the rabid hen, it is not a fan of so and so actress, it just plays one on a blog. Too bad the whiny hen is not supporting that Actress. AJ is an international star with a large fan base. It is not all rags and their lies. There is a big world out there and last time I check not many Actors/Actresses can claim to be an international star. Get your head out of rags trolls and writing dissertations on blogs. All these fake competitions are too funny. Been there, read the rant. Just substitute the name.

groundcontrol @ 10/13/2009 at 8:14 pm

I’m not sure what set off the poster calling herself Olivia but I am happy that Charlize has such a supportive fan. I have enjoyed her work.
.
Unfortunately in promoting Charlize she uses the exact same tactics of which she accuses Angelina’s fans. Seems like an endless circle of criticism to me.
.
While I enjoy Charlize and think she is a lovely person, I have read enough about her and interviews of her to know that she is professional enough to know that some discussion of yourself and your private life is required in promoting yourself and your films. She is not reticent about this nor should she be. It’s simply part of the process.
.
Just as there is criticism of Angelina so is there criticism of Charlize. There was a lot of criticism of Charlize over what people believed was a gimmicky bid for an Oscar by uglying herself up in Monster. There was much debate about how the Academy loves to reward beautiful women who make themselves unattractive. I don’t share that criticism but there it is. I also see nothing wrong with it even if she did take this role in the hope of getting an Oscar.
.
Just as there is critical acclaim for Charlize so is there critical acclaim for Angelina and long before there was all this tabloid talk of her. Angelina was garnering critical acclaim and notice from her earliest days in film – for Hackers, for Cyborg even, and she started racking up the awards in her early 20s starting with George Wallace. To suggest that the only reason Angelina gets roles or attention is because of her personal life is factually incorrect and intellectually dishonest. Before any of this tabloid nonsense began Angelina was already an Oscar winner.
.
I’m not sure what point this Olivia is trying to make but her attacks on Angelina read too much like the typical uninformed assaults by fans of other actresses trying to build them up by trying to diminish Angelina. They seem to consist of nothing more than baseless accusations against her. She is just trying too hard.

Theron is an excellent actress and beautiful woman. Unfortunately her film choices since Monster have not suited her talent well. Jolie is perfect for this genre and as it looks like Pitt’s moneyball and city of z are on hold she may be the bread winner of the family these days even though she’d prefer to take more time off.
Not a fan of aniston, actually I’m usually quite critical of her PR games, but there is no reason to bring her up in this post.
Audiences stereotype actors. Jolie’s action films do better than her dramatic roles (although she always has award noms for the latter). Think this one sounds good and will probably try to see the french version.

I suspect that BP got enough Bread in the bank to support his family as well as AJ. They take turns working and as nothing is definite yet, time will tell. JMO.

alexkziel @ 10/13/2009 at 8:47 pm

I’ve been reading some blogs about Z’s hair article and is AMAZING the support on Angelina.
Even from people who is not fan.

This comment is so touching, talk about perspective.
_______________________

Image of zoethebitch zoethebitch
05:42 PM

My hair fell out last spring during chemo. I was worried and self-conscious for about a week. Then I decided I was bald and if someone didn’t like the way I looked, that was their problem.

I feel nothing but pity for someone whose job entails (even for one day) writing bitchy articles about how some celeb parent is dealing with their child’s hair. “To many, she’ll be just a black little girl—and a black girl with bad hair at that.” You must be kidding.
_______________________________

Not impressed by JA @ 10/13/2009 at 9:01 pm

It’s because that so called Olivia is not a Charlize fan, she is a Maniston fan. Actually Charlize fans are like hers, supportive but in a not defending agressively way, more humble especially when figures are there.
.
Like i said, Charlize is loved by most people but has no real fanbase when it comes to her support her movies.
.
She is a likeable person but few people can even name three movies where she starred and fewer even follow her movies, anticipating the release of her movies. Figures don’t lie. No movie star can make less than $15,000 in a week even after three weeks even if in 26 theaters. Even the serious press doesn’t write about her performance though she is talented.

.
Also for so called fans, i am amazed at the blatant lies and the misinformations they spout about Charlize private life. I remembered clearly Charlize who at the beginning of her career in the US was often asked some controversial questions avbout Apartheid, Frederick Declerck, the last racist president and what she thought about Mandela AND HOW SHE WILL VOTE. At some point, they were even rumors about her family mistreating Black south africans in their farm during the apartheid regime.
.
I am not even a real fan of her but i remembered those questions asked to a woman who used to say that her family were boers and that her language was afrikaaner, that she loved sex and was pretty rock and roll and of course she explained how her mum killed her violent father when she was 15 or 16 with his rifle.

olivia @ 10/13/2009 at 6:42 pm

I’ve nothing against Charlize , she’s quite pretty and good actress but she is just not interesting and does not had the “it” factor which can attract audience.Sorry ,but only a few actresses hat it, Angelina had it, Reese W. had it, Katherine Heigl had it. Jennifer Garner ? Kidman blah. SOME JUST DOES NOT HAVE IT.
“Aeon Flux” , a big budget , heavily marketed movie ,expected to do as well as Joli ” Tomb Raider ” and was release immediately after Charlize had her Oscar. With all these positive factors behind, the movie still bomb big time!!!! , and there’s North Country, last year Oscar bait movie ” In the Valley of Elah” ,, these movie were heavliy promoted, Charlize was everywhere promoting those movie but still end as BO flop.
I’m sure with Charlize talent and beauty , she can still get work but with her record of flops, don’t expect big budget staring role and big pay check. SHE IS NOT GOING to reach THE SAME paycheck as Angie or Reese. OR EVEN HER LOOK ALIKE kATHERINE HIEGL . No way !
And stop those sh.t Theron does not like attention, she was a almost regular in evey fashion show, and commercial party. did we ever see Angie or even Reese, Julia Robert in those show.?
And talking about the commercial failure of Changeling, Changeling is an adult , serious drama movie, which had proven on recent year , is a hard sell movie . put any A list actors on it, and won’t still make much, Look at Streep ” lions of the lamb” , Reese ” Rendition” all make less than 20 million. Robert ” Dublicity ” C. Diaz ” the lovely Bone ” are not that quite successful either. I’m sure put Theron on Changeling , the movie won’t even widely released or have go-signal from the studio.

ManLESSton, I likely @ 10/13/2009 at 9:09 pm

Observer2 @ 10/13/2009 at 6:51 pm
olivia @ 10/13/2009 at 6:42 pm
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
You’ve said bye how many times now? Let the door smack you in the a$$ on the way out.
.
==============
.
Holy b!tchslap! That was the best Observer!
.
BTW, Nippy’s thread is dead. Only bet, jade, and ellie talking to each other. RIP Nippy thread. he he

JJB Muse is QQQ mwah haa haaaa. She despises Brad because she hates peen and the fact he gets to f*ck her. **** that she is

Can we Charlize alone? This is what the trolls do.

angie fan @ 10/13/2009 at 9:48 pm

This story is probably not even true and look how we turn on each other. Chalize vs Angie what is that all about? Whatever happens will happen. Brad and Angie will do what is best for their family as they have done in the past. Momma works or Daddy works. That’s the way it is.

annieisnotokaymichael @ 10/13/2009 at 10:12 pm

Guli is an old *****

annieisnotokaymichael @ 10/13/2009 at 10:13 pm

Guli’s breasts are saggy

@olivia: You are wrong, Tabloids hunted down Angie & her family because their pictures alone sells lots of money & meaning lots of money for the papz & magazine companies. Angie shy away from the papz cameras but too bad because papz are crazy to get her pictures whatever it takes. Brad & Angie’s pictures sells that’s the bottom of it it sells & it make other people rich. Did you get it? Brad & Angie are famous all over the world, they are known internationally. Can’t you put that in your thick head ?

Photos of Shiloh sell for 50k. She and the twins are the get

JJB People. Mega3b Seriously2 is LONDON, Muse is QQQQ and her other name Adore on JJB

They’re both Brad haters to the 10th power and boo hooo stuck with their email group and Jared’s

there’s a story out now that Jen the chin went nuts and got depressed after seeing the beautiful Jolie/Pitts out with their beautiful twins.

I believe it 581, both Brad & Angie looked positively over the moon and beaming, and those kids were a reflection of that happiness. That had to just kick Maniston in the guts.

julie @ 10/13/2009 at 11:52 pm

there’s a story out now that Jen the chin went nuts and got depressed after seeing the beautiful Jolie/Pitts out with their beautiful twins.
.
Where did you get that from?Any links?

Passing Through @ 10/14/2009 at 12:34 am

4Q -
.
Ruh ruh… Looks like you’ve got your very own stalker.I guess she got tired of trying to jump up Dina #1′s ass so now it’s your turn…

@julie:
Maniston is only depressed because her 2 movies bombed in a row, with one of them being a “thermonuclear meltdown”. Nothing to do with the JPs. If she wanted family and kids, she wouldn’t be filming one movie after another.

@julie: I doubt that!! Tabs and Angie haters say the same about Angie. I doubt either woman cares about the other. I wish the media would just stop this nonsense.

Congrats 4Q!!!!!!
You have your very own stalker :-P

Sorry to say this, but I don’t think people should turn this thread into a Angelina vs. Charlize kind of war. To me, they’re different kind of celebrities but both are very talented and that’s what really matters when it comes to movies. I personally admire Angelina the most out of all celebrities out there. I’m her fan since long time ago and I believe she’s the most beautiful woman I’ve ever seen, inside and out. But I don’t have anything against Charlize, tbh (as long as she doesn’t talk crap about Angie, of course, lol). I loved her performance in Monster and I think she has talent but after that I haven’t watched more movies of her simply because I’m not that interested. However, I do think she has her fair share of fans and they deserve to be respected as much as Angelina’s fanbase. The only problem I see is that Angie fans have had to endure so much idiotic crap from Brangelina haters for almost 5 years already. I just hope Charlize fans understand that it’s just not the same level of fame we’re talking about and that’s why some people can be easily upset, imo. But I don’t see any real reason to fight.

Oh, and also, I don’t see the need to bring up X in this thread…Since we’re talking about talented actresses, I’d say her name is completely irrelevant :P I think people should just ignore her and focus on this possibly news…Anyway, that’s just my two cents :)

how would it be a make out scene with angie and charlize????
hmmmmmmmmmmm

Is it just me or doe this E!/Ted Casblancas thing have Stephen Huvane written all over it?

Just read this and I wanted to answer…

@olivia: “I can’t think of a single Angelina Jolie film that will be remembered well years from now when the press have moved on to another tabloid focus.”
—————————–
Really? I can think of more than one:

Gia.
Girl, Interrupted
Mr. & Mrs. Smith
Changeling

I understand if you don’t like Jolie, but please…don’t claim she doesn’t have a strong movie career and that her fame is only about the tabloids, because that is simply a biassed view. Important and respected people in the movie industry (like Clint Eastwood) would not praise her if it were otherwise.

^ Ouch, I forgot to mention “A Mighty Heart” in my list of Angie films :)

JJ has a thread on Megan Fox doing ads for Armani underwear. Maybe that’s how the rumor about Angelina came from. Megan Fox=The Next Angelina Jolie.

One other actress I can think of to replace Charlize is Uma Thurman. Uma can do action, she can do sexy and I think she is a good actress.
.
Only thing is, IIRC, Uma said that she didn’t like movies which took her too far from home because she wanted to be with her kids and she is a single parent.

Passing Through @ 10/14/2009 at 2:01 am

# 590 goya @ 10/14/2009 at 1:32 am
.
Is it just me or doe this E!/Ted Casblancas thing have Stephen Huvane written all over it?
.
++++++++++++++++
.
Are you talking about that story Terd posted yesterday where he claims to have a source who’s “supertight” or “superclose” to BOTH Brad/Angie AND X? First of all, Terd needs to make up his damned mind. On Friday he said Brad and Angie were happier pigs in slop. Yesterday he ends his lame-ass “insider info” post by saying that Brad would be “in Ange’s clutches for a few more years…or is it minutes?” Seriously…he waffles so damned much I wouldn’t be surprised if he owned a Waffle House restraurant. The man is more contradictory than a woman on the rag.
.
Also, to be perfectly honest I can only think of one person who would be “Supertight” with both Brad/Angie and X…and I can’t see him giving Terd the time of day much less insider info. That would be David Fincher. He’s friends with the Coquettes – snortin’ and tokin’ buddies to be exact. However, Fincher is a big ashhole. I can’t see him being friendly to Terd for any reason – simply because Terd doesn’t have jackshit Fincher needs and he’s not one to suffer fools gladly…and if Terd is nothing else – he’s a fool.

What the big juice here? Anything in particular or just the SOS? Not that I mind the SOS. Nothing makes me laugh more than seeing our regular sentries fight off the slags. :D

Oldie you’re a real spitfire too. You’re cracking me up.

One last reply to something…

@olivia: Pokeman, she didn’t carry the film and the genre made the movie a hit you idiot. Not any actor. Just like Shia Lebouf didn’t make Transformers a hit and just like Tobey Maguire didn’t make Spiderman films a hit. These genre films have their own built in audience.
—————————————————–
You’re kidding? That’s so not true. If action films had a secure audience on their own, movies like “Hulk” with Eric Bana, “Elektra” or even “Speed 2″ would have been a hit just because of the genre. You mentioned Angie doesn’t deserve credit for Tomb Raider because there’s already a big fanbase for the video game. Please, if that were also true, “Final Fantasy” would have been also a hit just because the video game already has a huge fanbase.
Truth is, people loved Angelina as Tomb Raider and loved her too in Wanted. Studios always make reviews for the audience and they showed Angelina is a big part of those movie’s success. Sorry, but you gotta give credit when it’s due.

@Passing Through:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, that one. Isn’t Melissa Etheridge still friendly with both BP and JA? plus any number of people at CAA. On Friday Casablancas was saying how sweet Aniston is and then yesterday how what you see is what you get. No one believes that stuff after all of JA’s self-serving interviews, her see-thru bare-breasted micro skirts on the red carpet and her foul mouth over the last 4 years. That headline yesterday is infuriating. Just titillation at Angie’s expense. JA is sweet and the-girl-next-door and AJ is the big, bad “doesn’t care” evil-doer. One of the commenters is beyond over the edge and referred to AJ & BP imploding saying “It is literally visible, as in written all over their faces, the darkness and deception they both perpetuate.” Talk about psycho!?!?!?!?!

I think it is all a Huvane plant. Maybe not Stephen, but Huvane. I am thinking “The Goree Girls” financing is on thin ice.

@goya:
Someone should show him Maniston’s Emmy (or was it GG?) after award interview where she thanked Brad for “holding” her up. She looked and sounded like a biitch. That’s the real Maniston. Of course now that she knows people are watching her to compare her to Angelina, she is always super nice to everyone. How come TC’s readers who are jenhens didn’t go out to support her movies? I am utterly puzzled.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/14/2009 at 3:11 am

an oldie @ 10/14/2009 at 12:36 am @julie:
Maniston is only depressed because her 2 movies bombed in a row, with one of them being a “thermonuclear meltdown”. Nothing to do with the JPs. If she wanted family and kids, she wouldn’t be filming one movie after another.

————————————————-
As the jenr*tards would say : SHE SHOULD STAY AT HOME and take care of those inner eggs and rest in order to implement the ‘I never say i didn’t want children, i did, i do and i will’…
.
Stay at home Manistonand don’t work, this is an advice that your fans like to throw to other women who have proven they can have it all and be successfully multitasking.
.
Since you are not one of those superwomen, since you are mediocre in at dating and sucks in movie, staying at home, pampering yourself and working at getting pregnant is a good advise from those neanderthalians one dimensional women you have as fans.
.
Just sayin’

I think Angelina would be perfect for this role.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/14/2009 at 3:36 am

lylian @ 10/14/2009 at 1:52 am One other actress I can think of to replace Charlize is Uma Thurman. Uma can do action, she can do sexy and I think she is a good actress.

—————————————–
But i think this movie is more of a suspenful thriller than typical adrenalin related action movie.

I don’t read Terdy’s column but as people bring his comments here, I do find out about what he has to say about Brad and Angelina.
.
All I can say is that terdy pulls his “insider” ssshitt right out of his a s s.
.
If Brad and Angelina were really fighting so hard that a break up of the marriage is possible to predict, then Terdy should back it up with some verifiable signs. Like long separations or photos of either party fondling another person.
.
Instead, what terdy has as evidence of Brad and Angelina breaking up is confirmation that they holidayed together in Africa and then a few weeks later, Brad accompanying Angelina on a semi official trip to Syria and Jordan. As if any couple facing imminent break down would bother to go for 2 holidays together in the space of 4 weeks.
.
YAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!

an oldie @ 10/14/2009 at 2:31 am @goya:
Someone should show him Maniston’s Emmy (or was it GG?) after award interview where she thanked Brad for “holding” her up. She looked and sounded like a biitch. That’s the real Maniston. Of course now that she knows people are watching her to compare her to Angelina, she is always super nice to everyone. How come TC’s readers who are jenhens didn’t go out to support her movies? I am utterly puzzled.
___________________

Oldie, no, what you show him o prove she is a HUGE nasty b*tch w/ severe problems is RIGHT HERE:
.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1gawY7WHcY&feature=PlayList&p=17088BC7B7438FC7&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=82
.
Start watching at 2:17. THAT, is the REAL Aniston. Also, you can tell Huvane is somewhere off-set, she keeps looking at him like, get me outta here. I alway point to this as not only her showing her nasty side, but a DUMB as fck side, her shallow as fck side and catty as fck side – mixed in with her own low self-esteem side that she tries to camoflage. Everything you always thought about Maniston is here in that once answer to that one question. Needless to say, I doubt Babs is a fan. LOLOL.

.

purple poet @ 10/14/2009 at 6:55 am

Just Jared is filled with Angelina Jolie obsessed hags. GET A LIFE. All YOU DO IS POST HERE ABOUT ANGELINA ALL DAY AND NIGHT. SHE DOESN’T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT YOU.

This is a classless emaciated hag who for the past 10 years has been seeking attention in the press whether it’s blabbing about her sex life, cutting, making out with her brother, bragging about how many lovers she has and then claiming she’s only been with 4 people her entire life. Then ofcourse she gets with boring, pothead Brad Pitt. He’s just a puppett anyway.

She’s a fake, a phony. And anyone with taste would rather see the lovelier, classier, and more talented Charlize Theron act. Could Angelina pull off a performance like Monster? Never in a million years. She gives the same one-note performances and tries too hard to be sexy. That’s not sexy! Charlize doesn’t have to try. And she can be classy and sexy and versatile all at the same time.

Hollywood is a weird place not to realize what a gem they have in Charlize Theron (beauty, talent, class, charm) and what a piece of fake sh** they have in Angelina Jolie.

Angelina would be nothing without her father and the tabloids anyway. Yeah I remember her years ago bragging about banging Billy Bob ON THE RED CARPET at a film premiere. She’s disgusting.

purple poet @ 10/14/2009 at 6:59 am

lmfao. I just read some of the older posts. Seriously Audrey Hepburn is ROLLING IN HER GRAVE.

Angelina Jolie does not compare to the grace, class, sophistication and presence of all hollywood goddesses but I tell you Charlize Theron definitely does. In fact Charlize Theron would be an even bigger star if she were around in the 40′s and 50′s.

But today they want tabloid trash and generic rom com actresses to be stars.

Not impressed by JA @ 10/14/2009 at 7:09 am

imfao at this so called purple poet…if it can help to comfort your paain be my guest, anistonmaniac moron !

the real lou @ 10/14/2009 at 7:33 am

# 605 purple poet @ 10/14/2009 at 6:55 am

# 606 purple poet @ 10/14/2009 at 6:59 am

********************************************************
Can we say OWNED!!!!!! Funny how these so-called Charlize Theron fans are coming out of the woodwork when her threads usually have 8..24…56 posts on them,lol.BUT put Angelina into the mix and they will post all day and all night long…..like I said, Angelina owns their as*es.

the real lou @ 10/14/2009 at 7:39 am

# 606 purple poet @ 10/14/2009 at 6:59 am ….You maybe want to read up on Audrey Hepburn BEFORE throwing stones at Angelina.Audrey was FAR from being perfect.

Audrey Hepburn rolling in her grave??? BWAHAHAHAHA!!! She’s probably cheering Angie on — Go, girl, with your family, humanitarian activities and your movies! Angie is doing what Audrey has done in her later years … Audrey would be thinking I could have done my UNICEF actvities much younger!

Darn another movie I will have to miss…..