Top Stories

Brad Pitt Gets Into a Fender Bender

Brad Pitt Gets Into a Fender Bender

Brad Pitt takes his newest custom motorcycle out for a spin in Beverly Hills on Saturday (October 24) and gets into a little fender bender.

The 45-year-old Inglourious Basterds actor’s side-view mirror reportedly “nicked the mirror of an adjacent car and he lost balance on his bike. His motorcycle reportedly wouldn’t start after it fell to the ground, so the star called his security team for a lift.”

25+ pictures inside of Brad Pitt, the brash biker…

Like Just Jared on Facebook
brad pitt biker brash 01
brad pitt biker brash 02
brad pitt biker brash 03
brad pitt biker brash 04
brad pitt biker brash 05
brad pitt biker brash 06
brad pitt biker brash 07
brad pitt biker brash 08
brad pitt biker brash 09
brad pitt biker brash 10
brad pitt biker brash 11
brad pitt biker brash 12
brad pitt biker brash 13
brad pitt biker brash 14
brad pitt biker brash 15
brad pitt biker brash 16
brad pitt biker brash 17
brad pitt biker brash 18
brad pitt biker brash 19
brad pitt biker brash 20
brad pitt biker brash 21
brad pitt biker brash 22
brad pitt biker brash 23
brad pitt biker brash 24
brad pitt biker brash 25

JJ Links Around The Web

Getty
  • Adam Goldberg expecting baby with girlfriend Roxanne Daner- US Weekly
  • Chris Brown and Karrueche Tran flipped their relationship back to on- TMZ
  • The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies set to win post-Christmas box office- Gossip Cop
  • R5 celebrates the holidays with hockey and snow- Just Jared Jr
  • 40 most shocking moments of television in 2014- Entertainment Weekly
  • Hollywood's most influential costume designer vies for another Oscar nod- Huffington Post
  • The Entourage movie is just around the corner- Lainey Gossip
  • Could Nightcrawler be the Crash of this season?- The Hollywood Reporter

566 Responses to “Brad Pitt Gets Into a Fender Bender”

Pages: « 117 18 19 20 21 22 [23] Show All

  1. 551
    Paps Not At Fault this time Says:

    @Jill:

    Jill, I just watched the video on TMZ over and over they played it…No paps were near him at all, he went in between cars and hit a parked car. Looked clumsy. Glad he’s ok but it wasn’t the paps fault, Nor were they blamed.

  2. 552
    groundcontrol Says:

    Tiresome Blather @ 10/26/2009 at 2:51 pm
    groundcontrol @ 10/26/2009 at 12:31 pm
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    If you insist – my response in 2 posts.
    .
    Spare me the lame scare tactics. In all caps no less. It doesn’t work. It may not be my practice area but I am versed enough to know what defamation is and what it is not. And I‘ve lived long enough to smell your agenda.
    .
    Defamation is not challenging the veracity of TMZ or any other purported “news” agency in their reportage. Defamation is not suggesting, even declaring, TMZ has a vested interest in blaming the target of paparazzis and exculpating paparazzi behavior. Defamation is suggesting or even outright naming you as a “TMZ defender.” You can’t be serious about that. Do you even understand what defamation is? If you do then it doesn’t show in your hilarious personal tirade against me. Or in your laughable pretense that I have somehow defamed you or TMZ. You must think everyone else is a fool. What am I saying? Of course, you do. You think everyone else is stupid but you. You think everyone here is uneducated. Your arrogance is amusing considering your inability to grasp my posts and even understand why that video is worthless in exculpating the paparazzi chasing Pitt.
    .
    It seems apparent you have some agenda that has made you lose control of your good sense. Did you even read your post before you submitted it? No one in my profession would write the things you have written about another person.
    .
    Once again you resort to name calling and insults toward me to attempt to win your argument and somehow “discredit” me. You don’t know me and you don’t know my credentials. On this, as on most all other discussion boards, posters discuss what they know and bring what they can to the discussion. Your complaint that my adding to the discussion equates to “showing off” is simply a red herring and a typical diversionary tactic.
    .
    The fact is you don’t like what I’m saying. You don’t like what I’m saying about Brad Pitt’s incident. You don’t like what I’m saying about TMZ. That’s too bad but it doesn’t explain your screed about me calling into question the quality of TMZ and X17 and the other gossip organizations. For you to even suggest that in any way even borders on defamation is laughable and ignorant of the law.
    .
    Since you came to this board under your insulting alias you have repeatedly twisted my words to misstate that I have suggested that TMZ was involved in the Brad Pitt incident. I have repeatedly corrected your distortion of my posts. Anyone can read for themselves my posts. Nowhere do I say that TMZ was present at the incident. In fact, I never thought they were present which was one of the reasons I specifically questioned their reportage of the events. I doubt that they interviewed all the witnesses present to get a full account of the events. I think they just talked to other paprazzi rather than do a thorough job with unbiased parties. Perhaps if you weren‘t so angry and adamant about defending TMZ then you would have been able to grasp my complaint against them.
    .
    You can continue your ridiculous rants for all I care. Your use of class insults as ad hominem attacks on me is quite telling. Your very visible anger is also quite telling. It would be unusual for a poster to be so vehement in their defense of TMZ unless they had a vested interest in either TMZ itself or in seeing to it that all the blame for this incident falls on Brad Pitt alone. Your words to the contrary hold no weight. You are anonymous here.
    .
    Your defense of Ian Halperin is curious. You once again misread my post to fit your agenda so you can mock my words. I am sure that the regular readers here understand my references about Halperin. Ascribing to my words some outlandish meaning is reminiscent of Halperin himself or one of his pathetic followers. Why in the world would you leap to this unethical person’s defense?
    .
    As for the video, it only shows what happens as Pitt drives away from the car following him. That is not conclusive evidence of anything. No matter how many sophomoric insults you hurl my way it does not change that all important fact. It does clearly show, however, that he was indeed being followed by the paparazzi car. Neither they nor you are as clever as you think.
    .
    If Pitt was trying to get away from and place distance between himself and a paparazzi car chasing him or threatening his safety then that paparazzi could be implicated in any accident that resulted from their chase. That the paparazzi car was traveling at a slower speed at the time of the accident tells us nothing about the trail/chase that preceded it. Surely you aren’t this dumb.
    .
    Where is the rest of the video? Where is the earlier chase of Pitt? Are the paparazzi trying to suggest that it was only at those seconds that they first started filming Pitt? I doubt it.
    .
    This post continues below

  3. 553
    Playing Dressup! Says:

    @gracie:

    Calm Down Gracie, they are PLAY HEELS, like those sold in Toys R us..many had them way back, in my time they were Barbie sheels. One photo of Suri has a closeup and one heel is all torn on bottom…Play dress up heels….no big deal. Better then a 3 yr old girl (who shall be nameless) wearing disgusting black combat boots!

  4. 554
    no paps Says:

    @marina:
    Paps had nothing to do with this. this was Brad riding between cars and hitting one. saw it on tv, the paps were farrrrr away from him.
    and weren’t blamed.

  5. 555
    shave pls brad! Says:

    Damn he looks upkept and in need of a shower, shave and a haircut. Mostly, a shave, can’t stand the ugly billy goat gray beard, or whatever it is. He also stopped grooming it seems, with AJ.

  6. 556
    groundcontrol Says:

    Grouncontrol’s response to the Insistent Bother Part Two
    .
    Tiresome Blather @ 10/26/2009 at 2:51 pm
    groundcontrol @ 10/26/2009 at 12:31 pm
    .
    ========================
    As for the video, it only shows what happens as Pitt drives away from the car following him. That is not conclusive evidence of anything. No matter how many sophomoric insults you hurl my way it does not change that fact. It does clearly show, however, that he was being followed by the paparazzi car. Neither they nor you are as clever as you think.

    If Pitt was trying to get away from and place distance between himself and a paparazzi car chasing him or threatening his safety then that paparazzi could be implicated in any accident that resulted from their chase. That the paparazzi car was traveling at a slower speed at the time of the accident tells us nothing about the trail/chase that preceded it. Surely you aren’t this dumb. You certainly show your lack of understanding of evidence if you think an obviously edited clip of video proffered by an interested party is going to be admitted.
    .
    Where is the rest of the video? Where is the earlier chase of Pitt? Are the paparazzi trying to suggest that it was only at those seconds that they first started filming Pitt? I doubt it. Is this why it took a full day or more to release this video? Normally we would have seen a paparazzi video almost immediately. Did they need time to edit out the earlier trail of Pitt? I had to fight tooth and nail once for images from a bank surveillance video and when I finally got it there were crucial seconds and minutes mysteriously missing: all because the bank was concerned about protecting itself from a law suit. That happens all the time.
    .
    So shove your so-called “video evidence.” It is completely lacking in reliability not just because it is selective in what it shows but because of its source: an interested party, a party that could be subject to a lawsuit. No court would ever accept that as evidence unless the rest of the video was produced. I hope they weren’t so stupid that they destroyed any earlier segments. It may not be under subpoena now but after Pitt’s accident it certainly was foreseeable that it would be subject to one.
    .
    Your idle and completely uninformed threats aside, your posts reveal a bias that helps to explain your gutter insults, your inane use of all caps and irrelevant tangents. Stop pretending to be something you are not. It is all too evident by your demeanor and your failure to understand both defamation law and the rules of evidence that you are not a lawyer. Well, maybe third tier but that would be an insult to third tier.
    .
    I am not impressed. But the smell of fear and panic among the ranks of the paparazzi is unmistakable.

  7. 557
    zen2 Says:

    God bless you, Papa Pitt!

  8. 558
    first and last post Says:

    Bravo groundcontrol,
    liked your last posts Pt1 and P2. I’d be interested in how “tiresome…” responds if at all. I had the same thoughts as your post stated…not being an attorney or that comfortable enough to discuss, I wondered what the relevant responsibility was for another party such as the paparazzi who have a history of questionable behavior and intentions as indicated by the CA legislation I posted earlier to have “induced” an action such that a second party’s subsequent action caused harm or damage to a third party.
    Thanks for your going into that.

  9. 559
    AGA Says:

    YES-Well done Ground Control-This Tiresome Bother is exactly what his/her name says. BORING-And Brad has never said it was the paps fault,so I don’t know why he/it is so bothered.
    Also it’s legal sounding posts earlier changed to sound less lawyerly. LMAO

    I think that there is a special place in Hell waiting for Mr IUC-the man is a disgusting pervert.I went there once and was nearly ill.The stuff was horrible and uncalled for.I blame Anisiton for this mess.If she had handled things differently,then this BS would not be so strong 5 f/ing years later!!!!

    Also-WHY would Brad need to call the paps??They are camped outside his house and he is followed constantly,so it makes no sense at all to make this ludicrious claim.

  10. 560
    AGA Says:

    YES-Well done Ground Control-This Tiresome Bother is exactly what his/her name says. BORING-And Brad has never said it was the paps fault,so I don’t know why he/it is so bothered.
    Also it’s legal sounding posts earlier changed to sound less lawyerly. LMAO

    I think that there is a special place in Hell waiting for Mr IUC-the man is a disgusting pervert.I went there once and was nearly ill.The stuff was horrible and uncalled for.I blame Anisiton for this mess.If she had handled things differently,then this BS would not be so strong 5 f/ing years later!!!!

    Also-WHY would Brad need to call the paps??They are camped outside his house and he is followed constantly,so it makes no sense at all to make this ludicrious claim.

  11. 561
    mmsic Says:

    @Playing Dressup!: Your jealousy of Shiloh’s “disgusting” combat boots is so overwhelming.I would rather see a 3 year old wearing boots than”heels”.

  12. 562
    lylian Says:

    @groundcontrol:
    .
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    .
    BRAVO GC, Well said.

  13. 563
    eternal Says:

    Eastwood & Jolie

    http://img43.imageshack.us/img43/7197/index1r.jpg

  14. 564
    T.M DELAFONDA Says:

    @groundcontrol:

  15. 565
    Elaine Says:

    Brad is still so hot, glad he is ok. Luckily Angie.

  16. 566
    sabina Says:

    What a hottie in that vest…..anybody know what kind of vest that is and where I can get one for my boyfriend so I can pretend I’m sleeping with Brad! ;}

Pages: « 117 18 19 20 21 22 [23] Show All

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here