Top Stories

Brad Pitt Gets Into a Fender Bender

Brad Pitt Gets Into a Fender Bender

Brad Pitt takes his newest custom motorcycle out for a spin in Beverly Hills on Saturday (October 24) and gets into a little fender bender.

The 45-year-old Inglourious Basterds actor’s side-view mirror reportedly “nicked the mirror of an adjacent car and he lost balance on his bike. His motorcycle reportedly wouldn’t start after it fell to the ground, so the star called his security team for a lift.”

25+ pictures inside of Brad Pitt, the brash biker…

Just Jared on Facebook
brad pitt biker brash 01
brad pitt biker brash 02
brad pitt biker brash 03
brad pitt biker brash 04
brad pitt biker brash 05
brad pitt biker brash 06
brad pitt biker brash 07
brad pitt biker brash 08
brad pitt biker brash 09
brad pitt biker brash 10
brad pitt biker brash 11
brad pitt biker brash 12
brad pitt biker brash 13
brad pitt biker brash 14
brad pitt biker brash 15
brad pitt biker brash 16
brad pitt biker brash 17
brad pitt biker brash 18
brad pitt biker brash 19
brad pitt biker brash 20
brad pitt biker brash 21
brad pitt biker brash 22
brad pitt biker brash 23
brad pitt biker brash 24
brad pitt biker brash 25

Photos: Fame Pictures
Posted to: Brad Pitt

JJ Links Around The Web

Getty
  • Hillary Clinton tweets her support for Leslie Jones - US Weekly
  • Gisele Bundchen was spotted doing a sexy photo shoot - TMZ
  • Shawn Mendes slams Billboard for misquote about fans - Gossip Cop
  • Watch Christina Grimmie's latest video - Just Jared Jr
  • Jon Gosselin lashes out at Kate - Radar
  • Jamie Oliver reveals his newborn son's name - Lainey Gossip
  • Academy president responds to Birth of a Nation backlash - The Hollywood Reporter
  • whatever

    @dianad1968:

    if you bothered to read what beverlyhills claims, the de niro night is happening tomorrow at the beverly hilton in BEVERLY HILLS, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, not new york.

  • danny

    @ Sam @ 10/25/2009 at 12:46 pm

    Brad needs to be a man and admit he caused the accident all
    by himself. The video shows that. Don’t run down the paps
    because he screwed up. One pap even helped load his bike
    after he was long gone. He got out of there fast. Gossip Cop
    has a article about it. Go read that.

    ========================================================

    You know you and the paps just trying to spin this story for their benefit . Where is the video that TMZ keep saying they the have. You and I both know if TMZ has said video they would have posted it on their web site

  • ayrin

    @Sam: he does not owe you (or us, for that matter) any explanations. he does not have to admit anything. he is constantly chased and that can cause accidents, know that you are being harassed by careless papparazzis that are not real reporters.
    he does not owe you S*h*it

  • Not Impressed by JA

    ITA with Diana1968
    .
    Maniston asked her then husband to have an affair with Jolie and then come back to her rather than dump her !!!
    .
    What kind of a wife asked that to her husband ?
    .
    A woman who has no self respect whatosever, a woman who married her man with an hidden agenda. From Maniston own acting and saying, it was a business merger where she took benefits from and didn’t do her part of the deal, hence she asked Brad to get intimately involved with Jolie during that marriage when he said he was attracted to her. No respect whatsoever for herself as a woman nor for her husband and for the second woman.
    .
    That alone is an undeniable proof by proxy that Brad didn’t have an affair ! He went against Maniston wishes and call it quits BEFORE he went after Jolie and convince her.
    .
    Maniston is the homewrecher. Maniston wishes the affair that never occur as Brad never accepted those terms. Maniston is the fraud and the one with no respect for her wedding vows when she asked for that despicable deal and wanted Brad to cheat on her rather than leave to have a chance with the one he considered his soulmate while his wife was more like a buddy for who he needed s*x videos (offered by Man herself) to get aroused before he could finally bed her.
    .
    Now she sheds crocodile tears because the end of her merger limits her business benefits from it, hence she has been coatailriding Brad and Angelina after planing a nasty vendetta on false accustaions to extend the time frame where she could gain those benefits, including an Oscar she officially and publicly claimed 6 years ago !
    .
    Too bad, her date of validity is coming to an end, the mask is dropped, the fraud has less and less weapons and is more and more the emblem of losership and mediocrity.
    .
    All this, after an evelish scheme planted by her and her people nearly 12 years ago to get Brad in her bed within the first 5 hours, in her house within less than 200 hours after the first date and to lure him into a marriage he was luke warmth with to begin with. And for what results ?
    .
    TOTAL FAILURE according the initial plan and the poor benefits in both her professional and personal life !
    .
    Karma baby, karma is a beotch called Maniston !

  • Jill

    ellie’ @ 10/25/2009 at 8:01 am
    what makes you think Jen would ever want BP back ,Jen is the one that divorced him and kicked him out…
    **************************************************************************************

    Oh really? If she didn’t want him back, why in hell did she go whining to the media and launch a five-year pity party?
    .
    She divorced Brad because Brad was a gent and let her be the one to file the papers. She knew damn well he wasn’t coming back. This was his face-saving gesture to her. She should be grateful he did it.
    .
    ROTFLMBAO “kicked him out”? How in hell do “kick someone out” who is already long gone?
    .
    Go on back to the Aniston threads, ellie. I realize it’s dead over there but your level of intelligence simply cannot compete with the brains over here. Your brain-dead co-freaks like Bet and Laura2 are much more your caliber.

  • dianad1968

    @whatever:

    #251,

    So then WHY in your post did you imply that Angie was in NY on Friday and Saturday, AFTER you said Angie was attending the function for DeNiro? Why are you trying to mislead in your post? I did not read beverlyhills post, as I am sure neither did some of the posters here. You DELIBERATELY gave the impression that Angie was in NY so could not “hug and kiss” Brad.

  • Jill

    Just for fun, last night I clicked on the FF web site. Those freaks had me falling out of my chair laughing.
    .
    Are you guys ready for this? They have issues with the people posting on the IUC blog. They complain that those people aren’t FF regulars and they just pose as FF regulars to make the FF regulars look crazy.
    .
    Like anybody has to make those freaks of nature look crazy. They are doing a great job of that all by themselves.

  • Jill

    kelly @ 10/24/2009 at 6:01 pm
    Brad suffers from male pattern baldness.
    **********************************************************************************

    And you know this how? You live with the guy, or you just wish you did?
    .
    God, you trolls are so fcuking stupid….

  • 100mph

    Hmmmm~ I see ((ellie)) has eaten through her chains, and limped
    over to the JP’s thread…hahaahhhaahaha!
    .
    Could it be that beautiful pix of ‘Plug-Ugly’ set off a rabies reaction?
    .
    Me think so…. lol

  • the real lou

    # 248 Sam @ 10/25/2009 at 12:46 pm …Oh wow,you haters are really creaming in your panties over this story aren’t you?One would think Brad ran over a old lady crossing the street the way YOU people are yammering on.If the accident had involved anyone else it would have been a minor bleep (headline wise)But put Brad Pitt into the mix and it is BLOWN up to epic proportions by haters.Talk about people having too much time on your hands.LOL.Have a wonderful Sunday Jolie-Pitt fans.I’m out….this is WAY too much stupidity for me to waste my day on.

  • dianad1968

    @Sam:

    #248

    Figures, another “spin” of the story to blame Brad. When it was first reported on x17online, they said a pap was involved and there is a pic of Brad, seemingly upset talking to a guy with a camera. I tend to believe a pap was involved because there is a video of Brad riding his bike and talking to a couple just BEFORE the accident. Do you think an onlooker took that video? And Brad did NOT run from the accident. THere are numerous reports – if you care to find out – about Brad wheeling his bike to the side of the road, and also him being very calm and polite and exchanging insurance info with the driver of the car. THere is even a pic of him standing around. I imagine he eventually went into the apartment complex to try to avoid more of a spectacle.

    The funny thing is, if he had stayed around outside at the scene, you and all your other brain-dead ilk, would have been bleating that he was doing so for the attention. You people should join a cult, and drink some kool-aide a la Jim Jones.

  • http://www.tenonanatche.com/stone.htm Stone

    Remember Princess Di?

  • dianad1968

    @Not Impressed by JA:

    #254,

    THese nincompoops in their revisionist history, are trying to save face for their “girl”. They are TRYING (very hard) to imply that Brad is ONLY with Angie, because X filed for divorce. The ONLY problem with that “story” is the speed with which Brad MOVED on. LOL. It’s obvious he couldn’t wait to be divorced. LOL

  • dianad1968

    Surprisingly People does not have the story up on their website. Thank God for small mercies.

  • an oldie

    TRL and Dianad1968, it’s true that the haters are desperate wanting to paint the accident as a hit and run against Brad. How do you hit and run when you leave your vehicle at the scene with dozens of paps around, and your every move was caught on camera? IMO, the haters have been throwing mud at Brad for the last 4+ years, but none of it has stuck, so here’s just another try at it. Too bad, this one is no scandal. Even if he caused the accident himself, nobody was hurt, except him, and no vehicle was damaged except his bike. So, how can this incident be damaging to his image? It’s a non-news event. You, haters, are grasping at straws.

  • an oldie

    @wobbler30:
    Fvck off, weeble wobbler.
    11-3 for me, Lylian. LOL. Should we stop the game since I am clearly crushing you?

  • jjb lurkin oficial report ppl!

    STFU ellee u imbreed hore !!

  • jjb lurkin oficial report ppl!

    http://jjb.yuku.com/topic/513684/t/Brad-Angelina-MegaPost-Part-3B.html?page=3044
    ###############################
    jjb thomas howard 6, 45 Pm , aKa fat guril or guye , blogen from forign place , LOL !!
    ####################
    Hi everyone!
    ###############################
    jjjb thomas howard post foto’s too 8, 39 pM , pG 3034 LOL!!

  • groundcontrol

    killer bee @ 10/25/2009 at 5:12 am read the legilsation before you start spouting off…when the new laws come in , paps are not allowed to take photo’s of celebs on private property…not public property so TMZ and other outlets will keep on stalking celebs just like today as long as they are on public property like ROADS,..
    .
    ###########
    .
    First of all most fans – uber or not – aren’t demanding photos of the Jolie Pitts or their children every day. We are perfectly content to see an occasional photo and buy tickets to their films. We are also the ones to complain the loudest about intrusive photos. This imagionary “demand” for photos by fans is just the excuse the celebrity industry uses to justify their lucre.
    .
    If you paid attention rather than spouting kneejerk comments you’d know that it is the lunatics at sites devoted to hating and slagging off Jolie, Pitt, and, yes, even their children, that constantly demand photos of them. They would not shut up about demanding to see the twins and Shiloh when she was younger. They even demand to see Jolie and Pitt together. Those sites are the ones that are first to grab published photos and blow them up to humongous size analyzing every inch of them to try to find “evidence” of their latest crackpot theory of something wrong with the children or with Jolie or Pitt or their relationship. They are obsessed with them. They can’t think of enough degrading and vulgar theories based on the tabloids and sleaze like Ian Halperin and every lowlife on the internet.
    .
    So spare us your groundless accusations. They are weak and bogus.
    .
    Further, you never know how laws will be interpreted by courts once litigation starts to wind its way through the system. Many a law has been greatly expanded by court interpretations. That’s called case law and it is just as important as the actual written statute. Legislatures cannot write laws that cover every situation so they make them broad and subject to much interpretation and expansion. But then this is just 6th grade civics and you should know this already.
    .
    THIS is why the paparazzi and photo agencies are scared witless and want to avoid taking responsibility for any situation which makes them look intrusive or dangerous. They stand to lose very big money if their picture taking ability is curtailed in any way.
    .
    I can easily envision a court interpreting a car as “private” and ruling that taking pictures of celebrities in cars is a proscribed act. Just as Fourth Amendment case law expanded to include modern communication and privacy law expanded similarly, I can see this law being interpreted in ways none of us have envisioned yet. But rest assured the paparazzi live in fear of this inevitability. It is not a stretch to envision the court deciding that any form of transportation should be included – even motorcycles – as in a “zone of privacy.” Once you get to the concept of a zone of privacy then even locations now considered “public” may take on a new meaning depending upon the circumstances and activity involved, a private picnic at a public park, for instance.
    .
    There are other areas of a celebrity’s life that may end up included in the definition of “private.” The courts can easily limit the proscriptions to commercial photo taking and commercial use to protect the ordinary citizen. I any event, predicting where courts will take a statute is a fool’s game.
    .
    On a more practical level, the stalking and chasing of celebrities in traffic may well be the next proscription further curtailing paparazzi conduct. Those could be handled by local traffic laws. The paps and their agencies sure don’t want someone as popular and powerful as Brad Pitt spearheading a campaign to back such laws.
    .
    This is getting more interesting and hopefully beneficial to everyone who may be placed at risk by the reckless disregard of the paparazzi and their industry.

  • dianad1968

    credit mega 3b,

    http://www.pr-inside.com/ryder-i-wasn-t-jealous-of-jolie-s-r1544608.htm

    This girl is a LIAR as well as a THIEF. Angie thanked this loser in her acceptance speech, what the h*ll more did she want? And she claims she wasn’t jealous of Angie’s win ? Please, it is so obvious she was and still is. Jealousy is oozing from her pores.

    I hate when actors/actresses lower themselves to the gutter by dissing other actors/actresses. This is why I admire Angie. She would NEVER say something like this about someone else. And I used to like Wynona.

  • nick in his on gurlfrend lory

    http://jjb.yuku.com/topic/513684/t/Brad-Angelina-MegaPost-Part-3B.html?page=3045
    #################################################
    jjb beverly hill siad ,
    I didn’t know Judas posted the pre accident pics..dayum, he’s such a bad reporter. Nik, my pm needs no reply, dude. ah shit..look what the cat dragged in
    ####################################
    jjb bev jj iz judas ???? 365 bev bish do’nt keep u from useng jj’s foto’s , thin u cliam u do’nt visit jj’s ! LOL! LOL!
    ###########################################
    jjb thomas howard da phonee ,
    ohh I think it does
    #############################################
    jjb thomas howard aka nick , aka alY , aka lory , pm , lurks , sind phonee fot’s of hiself , whille on forign place , pritindin too be a famous men modle !! LOL !! whot men do dat !! whot men blog on women blog too bullee women ????????????????

  • http://www.tenonanatche.com/stone.htm Stone

    And why is this man smiling?

  • whatever

    beverlyhills claimed angelina was in new york on friday , but beverlyhills then said angelina was back home by staurday afternoon?

    my point is angelina never left L.A for new york this week. angelina has been in L.A all this week
    beverlyhills claimed angie was in new york friday and saturday, but changed her tune as soon as brad needed a hug.

  • jjbnick iS hiS on sister TRisH

    jjb thomas howard u ANIT eveR gon bee BRad PiTT !!
    jjb thomas howard u ANIT eveR gon bee BRad PiTT !!
    ###################################################
    jjb thomas howard u r a fat phonee wan A bee bRAD !!
    jjb thomas howard u r a fat phonee wan A bee bRAD !!
    ####################################################
    jjb thomas howard u tri and git jjb women too talk of u and sex !!
    jjb thomas howard angie wood not give u de time of daye !!
    ######################################################
    jjb thomas howard we no u r a LIER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Jill

    whatever @ 10/25/2009 at 2:11 pm
    beverlyhills claimed angelina was in new york on friday , but beverlyhills then said angelina was back home by staurday afternoon?
    my point is angelina never left L.A for new york this week. angelina has been in L.A all this week.
    ***************************************************************************************

    Do you spend all your waking hours tracking Angie’s whereabouts? Obsessed much?

  • jjb nick iS a fat guye gurl

    http://jjb.yuku.com/topic/513684/t/Brad-Angelina-MegaPost-Part-3B.html?page=3047
    ################################
    jjb beverly hill de unemploye hoe who liv onn jjjb 365 thank she no bRAD and Angie SCEDULe , LOL !!
    jjb beverly hill cliam liv in condo , bish no wurk , LOL !!
    jjb beverly hill thank she beter dan jj’s !! LOL !!
    jjb beverly hill u were retart on baforums , LOL !!

  • Goya

    killer bee @ 10/25/2009 at 5:12 am

    read the legilsation before you start spouting off…when the new laws come in , paps are not allowed to take photo’s of celebs on private property…not public property so TMZ and other outlets will keep on stalking celebs just like today as long as they are on public property like ROADS,..
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    That IS NOT what the new law in California is about at all. It DOES NOT PROHIBIT anything and it isn’t a PENAL code. It only allows subjects to SUE paps and their agencies if photos are published of them, their children, friends and families, in private situations.

  • jjb nick iS a fat pER,V

    http://jjb.yuku.com/topic/513684/t/Brad-Angelina-MegaPost-Part-3B.html?page=3048
    #############################
    jjb thomas howard de phonee , heelo jjb ppl eveery pg !! whot men do dat ????????????
    #################################
    jjb thomas howard u dant fOOL me , u fOOL few !! LOL !!
    ################################
    JJB THOMAS HOWARD ANIT be brad , LOL !!
    BEv U leir bish !!! 365 bev , LOL !!

  • Not Impressed by JA

    IB DOMESTIC estimated figures – FOREIGN NOT updated YET
    *********************************************************************
    Domestic: $119,392,000 ( weekend estimations)
    + Foreign: $168,905,245 (NO weekend update YET)

    ——————————————————————————–

    = Worldwide: $288,297,245

  • Not Impressed by JA

    “Paranormal Activity” has only costed $15,000 and already generated more than $62,000,000 !!
    .
    Dayum, Talk about good investment !

  • A Lurker

    http://www.screendaily.com/news/distribution/up-retains-the-overseas-crown-as-19m-boosts-tally-to-324m/5007281.article

    overseas box office:

    Universal/UPI’s Inglourious Basterds is closing in on $175m after $4.5m from 2,640 sites in 50 elevated the running total to $173.5m. Despite poor weather the film launched at the top in South Africa on $140,000 from 59. The next release will be South Korea on October 29 and Japan is the final market on November 20.

  • whatever

    beverlyhills is adement that angelina jolie is due to attend the robert di niro honor night at the beverly hilton tomorrow night in beverlyhills, L.A.
    what if this is another lie from beverlyhills?

  • IB Box Office Update

    Inglourious Basterds

    Domestic: $119,392,000 ( boxofficemojo.com )
    + Foreign: $173,500,000 ( screendaily.com )
    ——————————————————————————–

    = Worldwide: $292,892,000

  • NotimpressedbyU

    Ha!Ha!LMAO!! what’s up with the gold necklace and matching helmet? LOL!!! what a buffoon!

  • first and last post

    re: 181 groundcontrol @ 10/25/2009 at 1:17 am
    “In most all juridictions you are not required to call police or even report to police minor damage to a parked vehicle. I have no idea what California traffic statutes require.”

    http://www.dmv.org/ca-california/if-you-have-an-accident.php

    California has a Motor Vehicle statute mandating reporting of ALL damages over $750 within 10 days to the police.

    “Neleh mantra”… no mod please jared.

  • first and last post

    Re: GC, lylian, Neer, Goya et al whose names I too lazy to research.
    Let’s cut to the chase folks and get to the facts so posters can discuss from an intelligent base.

    There are three CA legislative bills covering paparazzi and celebrities.
    Taken from the CA SENATE RULES COMMITTEE Office of Senate Floor Analyses
    1. AB 381
    SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE : 7/12/05
    SUBJECT : Physical invasion of privacy: liability
    http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/05-06/bill/asm/ab_0351-0400/ab_381_cfa_20050816_132246_sen_floor.html
    DIGEST : This bill provides that, in addition to
    knowingly entering the land of another person without
    permission or otherwise committing a trespass, a person
    (the defendant) will be liable for physical invasion of
    privacy when that person creates in another person (the
    plaintiff) the reasonable apprehension of offensive or
    harmful contact, which the defendant has the apparent
    ability to carry out if not prevented, in order to
    physically invade the privacy of the plaintiff with the
    intent to capture any type of visual image, sound
    recording, or other physical impression of the plaintiff
    engaging in a personal or familial activity and the
    physical invasion occurs in a manner that is offensive to a
    reasonable person. The bill also provides that the
    offensive or harmful contact must be without the
    plaintiff’s express or implied consent.

    Existing law provides that a person is liable for
    constructive invasion of privacy when the defendant
    attempts to capture, in a manner that is offensive to a
    reasonable person, any type of visual image, sound
    recording, or other physical impression of the plaintiff
    engaging in a personal or familial activity under
    circumstances in which the plaintiff had a reasonable
    expectation of privacy, through the use of a visual or
    auditory enhancing device, regardless of whether there is a
    physical trespass, if this image, sound recording, or other
    physical impression could not have been achieved without a
    trespass unless the visual or auditory enhancing device was
    used.

    2. SB262 1998
    In 1998, SB 262 (Burton), Chapter 1000, Statutes of 1998,
    the so-called “anti-paparazzi” statute, was enacted. The
    legislation provides that a person who knowingly commits an
    unpermitted trespass is liable for a physical invasion of
    privacy when the trespass is committed with the intent to
    capture any type of physical impression of the plaintiff
    engaging in a personal or familial activity, and the
    invasion occurs in a manner that is offensive to a
    reasonable person. The legislation also provides for
    various remedies and damages for victims of physical
    invasion of privacy.

    In recent months there have been a number of incidents
    reported in the press in which “paparazzi” have captured
    photographs or recordings of celebrities by engaging in
    what have been described by the press and law enforcement
    as “overly aggressive” and “dangerous” tactics such as
    surrounding a celebrity and preventing her from moving in
    any direction or getting to her car, boxing a celebrity’s
    car with paparazzi cars, and ramming a celebrity’s car
    after chasing her into a dead-end street. While these
    incidents may give rise to criminal prosecutions and
    sanctions, this bill is intended to address these
    situations in the civil liability

    3. AB524 October 2009
    October 21, 2009
    SB254 Oct 2009
    http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/asm/ab_0501-0550/ab_524_cfa_20090511_105624_asm_comm.html
    COMMENTS : This important privacy protection bill seeks to deter
    the most egregious activities of so-called “paparazzi” by
    cutting off at the source the financial incentives that often
    presumably drive the worst and sometimes extremely dangerous
    behavior. Existing law creates a statutory cause of action for
    “invasion of privacy” that imposes liability on any person who
    (1) intrudes upon the private space of another person (2) in
    order to capture images or recordings of that person engaging in
    a personal or familial activity, and (3) in a manner that is
    offensive to a reasonable person. However, while existing law
    makes the actual capture , or attempted capture, of the image or
    recording a violation, the statute currently expressly states
    that the selling, transmitting, publishing, or broadcasting of
    the image or recording is not, by itself, a violation – unless
    the person publishing the image or recording has actually
    solicited or directed the culprit to violate the statute. This
    bill has been introduced by the Speaker to strengthen the
    privacy rights of all Californians by amending California’s
    existing “invasion of privacy” by making liable any person who
    sells, publishes, or broadcasts the image or recording, if that
    person has “actual knowledge the images or recordings were
    obtained illegally.” In short, existing law potentially imposes
    liability on a publisher of such potentially illegally-gotten
    material to the extent that the publisher may have solicited
    another to violate the law. However the violation is for the
    act of solicited or directing, not for the act of publishing per
    se . Under this bill, whether or not a publisher played any role
    in soliciting or directing unlawful obtaining of the image or
    recording, the publisher still would be potentially liable for
    publishing or broadcasting the image or recording if it had
    actual knowledge it had been unlawfully obtained. This is an
    important and strong change in the law, because, according to
    most reports, paparazzi work independently of the direction of
    the newspapers or other media that might publish or broadcast
    their work product. Indeed, the paparazzi typically sell their
    product after the violation has been committed.

    Big time Neleh mantra…no mod please Jared…thanks.
    Thanks to Neleh too LOL and hello to all JP supporters and to the lurking menage.

  • groundcontrol

    first and last post @ 10/25/2009 at 3:39 pm re: 181 groundcontrol @ 10/25/2009 at 1:17 am
    “In most all juridictions you are not required to call police or even report to police minor damage to a parked vehicle. I have no idea what California traffic statutes require.”

    http://www.dmv.org/ca-california/if-you-have-an-accident.php

    California has a Motor Vehicle statute mandating reporting of ALL damages over $750 within 10 days to the police.

    “Neleh mantra”… no mod please jared.
    .
    ##################
    .
    Thanks for posting that. I didn’t realize the threshold amount was so high out there.
    .
    Now if they would just adjust the misdemeanor/felony threshold amounts for property crimes.

  • groundcontrol

    Just briefly for now, it seems that the challenge may lie in breaking through the “corporate veil,” so to speak, to connect the photo agencies and the various users & financial benefactors of the paparazza peril.
    .
    Hmmm. There soon may be more of those “Harvey as victim” subpoenas floating around.
    .
    Thanks, FALP, for taking the time to post those.

  • karen

    @NotimpressedbyU:

    YOU ARE AN AS&S

    Sad. huh.. that you have NO ONE in your life to give you a special gift of signifcance. I know it is hard to see someone else so happy and in love. and there you are sitting alone in a room typing on a computer. Pissed that this man has a life.

    But hey don’t hate. turn off the Computer and go outside and find a life of your own. Then you will not be so jealous of someone else whom you do not know.. and who has no idea of you meger existence and could care less about what you think of them..

    See.. you are an As*.. Accept it and embrace it.. YOU ARE A STUPID AS*.. see just in that short amount of time you stepped down a level..

    Hurry now.. go get a life for yourself.. Brad’s life looks pretty good.

  • Passing Through

    # 201 ellie’ @ 10/25/2009 at 9:26 am
    .
    ROTFLMAO. I thought the Divine Miss Ellie said she didn’t post on J-P threads? Oops. Guess she lied.
    .
    Hey Ellie, sweetie – X was the one to file the papers because she was given an ultimatum, but you know that or else you wouldn’t be so defensive about my little comment about Brad not taking X back if her head was on a pike. Nice try though. Maybe someday you’ll hens will get over the dumping that wasn’t your own. It has been nearly 5 years. It took you less time to get over finding out the Easter Bunny isn’t real – and that was just last year.

  • killer bee

    ground control

    People sit here commenting on their photo’s 24/7 so I don’t know how you can say you don’t want to see photo’s. And don’t say you only comment when it’s a movie premiere…if that was the case JJ would be out of business.

  • first and last post

    287 groundcontrol @ 10/25/2009 at 4:03 pm
    Re: I didn’t realize the threshold amount was so high out there.

    Oh, I’m sure it’s because the cost of living is so high out in California. If your vehicle gets one nick, it could cost $500 just to repair it LOL. I had an estimate to replace the trim on a Mercedes and it was about $300 and that was over ten years ago! And with inflation I can’t even imagine how much it would cost now. People in California drive so crazy and parking spaces are so narrow to fit more cars, it’s not worth having a nice vehicle anymore unless one has the anxiety to live on the edge and money to go along with the edge LOL.

    Re: “Now if they would just adjust the misdemeanor/felony threshold amounts for property crimes.”

    As you probably are aware, the problem with misdemeanor/felony crimes are those who initiate such crimes don’t have any money, so any threshold is worthless…and don’t get me on that discussion and I won’t get you on the “princess” discussion.

  • karen

    When will some of you fools learn. We know what Brad/Angie allow us to know. They do not have leaks in their inner circle. NOBODY know squat about what they are doing or will do. We know what THEY allow us to know.. and that is not much. That is why all the stupid tab reports and stories. Reporters can’t find out anything about this family. They move from country to country and nothing..

    Brad and Angie and family came back to the US and the paps and gossip sites did not know sh^t until we saw a pic of Angie.. Then everyone thought she was back in France until we saw Brad.. Yeah I don’t believe the stories at all. Not until I get proof..

    Brad/Angie have a tight hold on information about them. I love it. The obsessed haters spend hours speculating on what they are doing and 10 times out of 10.. the fools are WRONG..

    When I see a pic I enjoy it.. When I don’t I deal..

    I love how they keep the fools guessing.. and guessing.. because they KNOW SH$t about this family..

  • Not Impressed by JA

    IB en route to reach the 300,000,000 mark at the end of the month with South Korea’s opening. Yay !
    .
    I think it will finished around 330,000,000 worlwide when it’s run is over with Japan finishing strong.
    .
    Hope the awards campaign will be the icing on the cake with some winnings.

  • Passing Through

    # 228 ellie’ @ 10/25/2009 at 11:21 am
    .
    ROTFL. Why was Ellie posting here all morning? Shouldn’t she have been out finding one of the remaining 4 theaters still torturing the public with Shite Happens? The flick has yet to reach $23MIL. Where’s her loyalty? Okay, okay…so she’s already $22.794MIL in debt from having bought every ticket sold thusfar, still…you’d think she’d go the extra mile and take one for the Gipper.

  • Passing Through

    # 243 dianad1968 @ 10/25/2009 at 12:30 pm
    .
    Dianad1968 -
    .
    X was the one to file because Brad gave her an ultimatum. She was supposed to file much earlier than late March and the ho dragged it out as long as she could and basically stalked Brad around LA for months – then abroad after he started visiting Angie and Mad in London. I’d hate to have to remind Ellie of X’s infamous June trip to London for what she claimed were Derailed reshoots – only there weren’t any scheduled and then Huvane started telling people she was on vacay and London was one of her fave cities. Btich hadn’t been on vacay to anywhere but Los Cabos for donkey years (except that Anguilla trip)…and she wanted people to believe she got a SUDDEN urge to visit London…a day after Brad arrived at the Luton airport and was picked by Angie and Mad. Yeah. Right. Vacation. Pffft.

  • Jill

    Since last weekend Sh*t Happens has been dropped by over 700 theaters and is now playing in 327 theaters. Next week, oblivion.
    .
    I thought she was supposed to be so popular in the UK? The movie has made a measly little $1.8 mil in the UK since it opened two and a half weeks ago.

  • val

    Coming out of lurking to say Happy Sunday to all of the lovely JP fans out there! Hope you all had a nice week and even nicer one to come. Well to the trolls..stay in your misery, stay wallowing in self pity and hate while you have wet dreams about the JPs breaking up. I enjoy watching you losers go crazy with hate, just like fugly.

  • Maria

    I just love Brad”s necklace. Doesn’t Angie have an excellent taste in jewelry. This necklace has a special meaning for Brad and Angie. It’s a Octagon, eight sides. one for each of the Jolie-Pitt family.

  • Passing Through

    # 257 Jill @ 10/25/2009 at 1:04 pm
    .
    Just for fun, last night I clicked on the FF web site. Those freaks had me falling out of my chair laughing.
    .
    Are you guys ready for this? They have issues with the people posting on the IUC blog. They complain that those people aren’t FF regulars and they just pose as FF regulars to make the FF regulars look crazy.
    .
    Like anybody has to make those freaks of nature look crazy. They are doing a great job of that all by themselves.
    .
    ++++++++++++++++++
    .
    ROTFLMAO. Now THAT is the funniest thing I’ve read all week. Those FFers have been feasting at IUC since he started his Angie attack back in the spring. Now that everybody on the internet is saying that site is full of crazies it’s suddenly not them. All anyone has to do is read the drivel on their site and compare it to IUC and see it’s the same crazies. I’m still laughing about that FFer website trying to disprove Angie was preggers last year. That shite was sheer lunacy. You’d think they’d be embarrassed, but they’re not. Meanwhile the twins were seen 3 weeks ago looking exactly like Brad and Angie…so where do the FFers think they got those 2 babies? LOL! Fvcking idiots.

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here