Top Stories

Katie Holmes & Suri Cruise: Lion King on Broadway!

Katie Holmes & Suri Cruise: Lion King on Broadway!

Katie Holmes takes her adorable daughter Suri to a matinee showing of the the Broadway musical Lion King on Broadway in New York City on Saturday afternoon (November 21).

FYI: Suri‘s red silk dress is Holmes & Yang, designed by her mom and stylist Jeanne Yang!

Yesterday, the mother-daughter pair were seen taking a stroll through Manhattan while on break from shooting her new movie, The Romantics.

20+ pictures inside of Katie Holmes and Suri Cruise watching Lion King on Broadway…

Like Just Jared on Facebook
katie holmes suri cruise lion king broadway 02
katie holmes suri cruise lion king broadway 03
katie holmes suri cruise lion king broadway 04
katie holmes suri cruise lion king broadway 05
katie holmes suri cruise lion king broadway 06
katie holmes suri cruise lion king broadway 07
katie holmes suri cruise lion king broadway 08
katie holmes suri cruise lion king broadway 09
katie holmes suri cruise lion king broadway 10
katie holmes suri cruise lion king broadway 11
katie holmes suri cruise lion king broadway 12
katie holmes suri cruise lion king broadway 13
katie holmes suri cruise lion king broadway 14
katie holmes suri cruise lion king broadway 15
katie holmes suri cruise lion king broadway 16
katie holmes suri cruise lion king broadway 19
katie holmes suri cruise lion king broadway 20

JJ Links Around The Web

ABC

229 Comments

# 1
Poor little girl @ 11/21/2009 at 5:48 pm

Still in high heels and wearing no socks in cold November

# 2

I like her high heels.

# 3
Poor little girl @ 11/21/2009 at 5:51 pm

Dragged for photo-OP by her mother who’s more interested in showing her cuteness to paps than keeping her little feet at warm by cold night. Not any socks for Suri. Never. Just high heels for this 3 years old girl.

# 4
anonymous @ 11/21/2009 at 5:51 pm

First we discover Suri’s still drinking from a bottle (horrible for the teeth) and now it appears that Suri in high heels was not just a one time thing. She’s walking everywhere in them, and on cement, too. Are they not content to just wreck her teeth? Are they trying to destroy her feet as well? What’s wrong with Katie Holmes? What a nut job to allow this foolishness.

# 5

Suri is autistic IMO. She shows many signs.

# 6
From an ex-scientologist @ 11/21/2009 at 5:56 pm

@ 11/08/2009 at 2:09 am From Marc Headley aka “blownforgood”
:

Well, Tom needed a girl and between Dave Miscavige and him, they were not coming up with anything workable, so — time to bring in the expert. Greg Wilhere was brought in for this job again. He had done it before, he just needed to qualify the girl a bit better this time.

It was agreed that they needed a foxy Scientologist that was on purpose, in ethics, yadda yadda blah blah. They set-up an audition unit at CC int that called in just about every Scientology actress anywhere under the sun, moon and stars. The “audition” was for a possible part in a Tom Cruise movie and several personal questions were asked about the person and what they thought of Tom, Scientology etc.

Video tapes would get made daily of the auditions and sent up to Dave to review. This went on for weeks. Well, it turns out that no girl in Scientology was good enough for Tom. All auditions were rejected. They would need to fish outside the pond for this one.
-

Plan B – Who do you want? This was the question Dave asked him. If you could have any girl, which one would you want? We will make her a Scientologist!

Well Tom Cruise wanted one girl more than any other – Jennifer Garner.

“How do we get to Jennifer Garner? Somebody who knows Jennifer? Good idea – who do we know that knows Jennifer? JJ Abrams!!! He does the Alias shows with her. Let’s have him do a project! We already have a director for the next Mission Impossible instalment, damn! I’ve got it, we will fire the current director that is contracted to do the movie and get JJ on board. Once JJ is on board we will get Jennifer on board and that’s it -we have her!”

So once JJ Abrams is on board, Tom finds out from JJ that Jennifer Garner has a big thing for tigers. Tom figures this is a sure way to get her. What does he do, he buys here a freakin’ tiger. Not a tiger skin, not a tiger stuffed animal toy, a real live freakin’ TIGER in a cage and all.

Jennifer is so freaked out that she thinks Tom is nuts! Turns out the tiger was not the best idea.
-
Who is next on the wish list? Scarlett Johansson!

We all know about that story. One meeting at CC Int and she was history.

Awesome factoid: Scarlett did not star in MI:3 because she was shooting another movie – The Island – which just happened to star the same actor that supposedly boned down on Tom’s last wife! Karma baby! Damn that dude is out to get Tom!
-
Okay, Greg Wilhere is now flying back and forth between LA and New York interviewing actresses and trying to get Tom some tail. Somehow Katie Holmes ends up on the list and the rest is history.

Now hear is the part that baffles all logic and only Tom, Katie and Tom’s lawyer know the truth behind this. If Tom cannot have kids with Mimi Rogers who now has two kids from a latter marriage, and Tom cannot have kids with Nicole whose pregnancy was reason for their divorce, then how does he manage to get Katie Holmes pregnant 2 hours into their relationship?????

Maybe the kid that Nicole was carrying was Tom’s!!! But she was really sleeping around and could not deny it. Either way, all the stress killed the baby and we will never know.

So that brings us to the current situation. Is Nicole up in arms because the kids are basically turning into Scientologists anyway. What does she have to lose?

And where the hell did Suri come from? That is a damn good question.
-

Marc Headley aka “blownforgood”
http://www.xenu-directory.net/accounts/blownforgood.html#Nicole_Scientology_and_getting_Tom_some_tail

# 7

It breaks my heart to look at Suri…

# 9

Where’s matilda??

Whatever you think of Suri Cruise, I think it’s really distasteful to publish photos where can see her underwear. She is a little girl and it’s just not right. At least crop the photo if you feel you need to show her crying.

She looks kind of happy in some of them…

Yes, she still drinks from a bottle… and that little Garner troll still wears diapers at 4 years old~!! It is clear that these celeb women (and men) make horrible parents, disciplinarians, etc. They are just producing more self-indulgent, arrogant, egotistical people like themselves and turning them out into the world probably to end up like most celeb children, spoiled, drug addicts, etc.

“sigh”

These parents, or that mother for the matter, is pathetic. Why drag Suri all over the place if the little girl doesn’t feel for it. Why force her out of the house (for the paps maybe?) and always dress her as a doll? Why sexualize her so much!? Suri’s just 3 years old!! I think Suri’s gonna have a lot of resentment towards her parents when she’ll be older. That is if it doesn’t turn out that she’s really autistic.

a realist @ 11/21/2009 at 6:08 pm

No socks, and heels… terrible.

Suri is starting to freak me out. She is a kid that dresses like an adult. That’s freaky to me.

She is very cute and seems happy in some of the photos. As a child she is bound to be cranky and cry sometimes.

poor Suri @ 11/21/2009 at 6:14 pm

Katie has her boots on and stocking because it’s now almost winter. Why isn’t Suri wearing any boots, or at least some socks under her high heels??

It is sexualizing a small child to put her in heels and fancy, adult dresse. No socks like normal parents put on their child. This child is being sexualized. Katies does not dress her like a child.

And for her to turn the child’s butt to the camera and let them get that crotch shot of her panties is just disgusting.

Jared, please take down the photo showing Suri’s underwear or at least blur it. As mentioned above, it’s very distasteful and an invasion of her privacy. Also, I’d hate to see pedophiles get their hands on something like this.

Jared, please take down the photo showing Suri’s underwear or at least blur it. As mentioned above, it’s very distasteful and an invasion of her privacy. Also, I’d hate to see pedophiles get their hands on something like this.

stephanie @ 11/21/2009 at 6:20 pm

it shouldent matter to any of you people ..
..your not her mother or a family member ?
so why does it matter to you people so much ..
mind your own damn buisness
the high heels are play shoes oviously ..
like tthe poor little girl is surrounded by paps ..
id say she is upset ..like omygod
xo

This child looks as an old woman!! that is bizarre.

Why is it that Suri is never wearing clothes to suit the weather?! When she was a baby they wouldn’t put her in a coat and now she’s getting older and they have her in open toed, strappy, high heeled sandals in the freezing cold!

And why isn’t she wearing shorts or tights under her dress? She’s a little girl, so it’s highly probable that her dress will fly up as she playing, shouldn’t her parents put something under her dresses. It’s disgraceful.

Desperate & Awkward @ 11/21/2009 at 6:24 pm

Desperate & Awkward. As always

Tom got Katie that job so she couldn’t go with him to Austria. Wonder if he and Cameron Diaz are getting it on? Cameron has such a great body and personality…also a decent actress.. none of which the homely golddigger has.

Tom’s going to go broke buying Katie D-List Homely jobs.

Maybe it was just a split second, so Im not blaming Katie, but those photos of Suri with her panties showing should be taken down.

It’s amazing how haters will always find something to criticize.
You guys say that Tom&Katie treat Suri like an adult; Suri is never happy; they never do anything fun, even though there have been tons of photos of her at the park and other fun places. ; she’s not potty-trained; she never wears a coat………………………… Well, here you have a mother and daughter seeing The Lion King which is a wonderful show for children. Suri looks happy in some of the picks. She’s wearing rainboots in some of the pics. She has a coat. You can clearly see that she is pottty-trained, although personally I don’t think that pic should have been posted. And yet you still attack them? Why don’t you just admit that you hate the family and will never be satisfied with anything they do.

Why should any of you care if Suri’s privates are showing if her own mother doesn’t?

Obviously, Katie Holmes could care less if pedophiles look at her daughter. Sick!

I wish Child Protective Services would take Suri away from them. Suri would be better off being raised by a pack of dogs.

Not In Nine Everyone else is. Begged to be cast. Marshall can’t stand her. Now she’s cast herself and Suri in the musical from H.E.L.L.

With all the wackos out there (case in point, the pedophile in the Shaniya Davis murder) it’s in poor taste, and dangerous, to post this little girl’s pictures with her underwear exposed like that…you never know where people get their jollies. Shame on you Jared.

Bunion Baby @ 11/21/2009 at 6:32 pm

Aww…Suri is going to need the cutest surgery.

It’s not Jared’s place to take the photo down, it’s Suri’s mother’s place to prevent this from happening.

Quit blaming everyone except the incompetent mother who uses a baby for publicity. This is child abuse with a capital A.

Stupid is as stupid does.... @ 11/21/2009 at 6:35 pm

Katie is either an idiot or she hates Suri.

The underwear picture is probably planned to show that Suri is no longer in diapers. Why carry a child in such a manner while she is wearing a skirt without any leggings? Katie has been carrying Suri in a ‘proper’ manner for the past months in order not to show the diapers , they are probably reading all these blogs and mags saying that Suri is still wearing diapers. well as evidence to say, Suri is not wearing diapers anymore, they probably staged a photo to prove. If this turns out true, the parents are sick and if they are listening to the PR team to stage this, they really need help.

Pantie Press Conference @ 11/21/2009 at 6:42 pm

is kate trying to prove that suri is potty trained again? she flashed suri’s panties back in july–making her cry then too. the NEXT DAY suri was spotted in diapers. check x17 vidoes.

so obvious. kate sucks as an actress.

now the daughter is wearing heels higher than her mother, and considering how small she is, I bet the heels can be considered even more damaging for a kid this small than they are for an adult.
-
At least they have the money to fix her feet, legs and column when they need it. Nothing can be done for ugly hammer toes, though, or katie would have fixed hers already.

Mommy Dearest @ 11/21/2009 at 6:43 pm

Just get divorced and give the kid to Tom already.

Desperate Indeed. @ 11/21/2009 at 6:46 pm

It’s like Katie is trying to grow a friend. Only one she’ll have.

TWPUMPKIN @ 11/21/2009 at 6:51 pm

KATIE HAS REALLY GONE DOWN HILL. EVERY PIC I SEE OF HER SHE LOOKS LIKE A HOMELESS PERSON WHO JUST GOT OUT OF BED. SHE NEVER SMILES ANYMORE.I GUESS MONEY REALLY CAN’T BUY YOU LOVE.

Suri will get hammer toes just like her mother Katie.

@Desperate Indeed.:
remember that suri is considered a “woman”, a strong one for all that, now, she’s dressing like one.
-
just pathetic.

The Holmes @ 11/21/2009 at 6:54 pm

All this contract stuff is no big deal. Katie’s parents had an open marriage. Katie’s used to the idea.

#35, I went to x17 video, and there are NO recent videos of Suri. So you either saw an old video or you’re making things up.

What is wrong with Katie Holmes? Even a podiatrist today commented on the damage to a child’s feet by placing them in heels. New York in November is cold, most people bundle up. She is bare-legged in those shoes. She is never appropriately dressed like other children, she is never seen with playmates only joined at the hip to her mother, always clutching her blanket or sucking a baby bottle. I think the they need to take parenting classes before it’s too late and permanent damage has been done to little Suri.

Also, I think it’s disgusting that some people are saying that Katie purposely let Suri’s underwear be photographed to show that she is potty-trained. If they care so much about what the public thinks, they wouldn’t allow her to wear heels after getting bashed for that. Obviously, they are just trying to live their lives, and don’t pay attention to the nasty things that are said about them.

NO sox in the freezing NY night & day? WTH????
Child Abuse!!!!

@Karly:

you like a 3 yr ld’s high heels? You demented human!
It is wrong & unhelthy for the fet & back & development & NO SOCKS!

I get the feeling, looking at the photos, that Suri is finding the cameras very distressing. She’s just a kid, she didn’t ask for all this. Shame on the photographers for harrassing a child.

She should be able to go for an outing with her mum without all this.

I don’t usually comment on a Holmes-Cruise/Suri thread.. I am not a fan nor a hater. I am a JP fan and I don’t like when they get ragged on so I will not do it to Tom/Katie. I really think they love each other and seem to be happy.

I think sites like jj or any site should stop posting pictures of Celeb children. I love seeing the jolie-Pitt kids. guilty as anyone else.. but with so much happening to children they need ot be off limites if their parents have not approved the shots. It just creates openings that should not be there. THE jps get critized for “pimping” their kids. well I can count on one hand the number of times I have seen those kids. Suri is shot a lot.. and I don’t know if it is on purpose or circumstance.. I hope the latter.

JJ please.. no more pics of the kids.. Please.. They are not celebs.. and should not be put on this site as if they are.

high heels (even low heels) mess up your spinal cord!

She should carry Suri more appropriately when wearing a dress. Showing her panties like that…I always put some small shorts on my daughter when she wears a dress. Even though she is a little girl, there ought not to be photos showing that. Of course most people don’t have photos taken of them all the time, taking in all their awkward moments.

@lisa:

they pimp their kid..the Jp’s live their life!

I have never seen Zee or Shi in high heels & no sox or leotards in the cold OR out at night.

Katie is a dingbat & Tom shagging Diaz? LOL
he’s closet..right Jared?

@ least we know she wears underwear now and people stop makig negative comments about it! Suri is such a cute diva!

Khristinne @ 11/21/2009 at 7:33 pm

Maybe she cries because she is finally cold LOL!

katie for once didnt look so bad in the last pics where she’s walking by herself in the day time
other than those shorts, or whatever they are, she looks ok 2 her standards

i hate so much suri!she is a very spoiled child!!and her mum could provide to give her more cold clothes,and possibly flats!!!she is still a young baby but her seems yet an hollywood star!!

The people who are ‘pimping’ the child are the photography agencies. They request photos of the big celebrities and their children (of the Cruises and the Jolies (when they can get them) in particular) to be taken because they know that every gossip blog worth its salt will host them. Exposure = cash.

The day I see a photo of Katie Holmes wearing a T-Shirt that says ‘I’m ready for my close-up!’ is the day I’ll believe she enjoys being stalked by paparazzi.

Amen! I’ve been saying this since suri was 6 mos. old. All the money and “designing” talent Katie has doesn’t mean much without a brain. Also, I’m suprised that Suri’s father doesn’t care.

Very cute pictures!!!!
What a lovely family.

if if have nothing nice, I would not say anything at all.

Jared, take down the picture of Suri with her underpants showing. You effing animal!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Have you not one spec of decency anymore??????????????? A__hole!

disgusted @ 11/21/2009 at 8:07 pm

I’ve been watching too much HLN and Nancy Grace but I think pix like these should NOt be posted. too many sickos out there. a lady on 1 of the HLN shows says she posted pix of her kid on facebook and the pix ended up on some perverts site and somehow the perv traced her and now has her address and personal info. be careful of what you post, people

@lisa: @49-Great Post Lisa..nearly my thoughts exactly! I’m more a J-P fan as well and it drives me mad when posters say “they are pimping there kids” when in reality the J-P kids have only been seen a handful of times all this year!! And the people on here that are complaining that Suri is dressed too old…will be the same complainers when the J-P kids come out “They are dressed like hobos” Shi is dressed as boy”
ETC ETC. I DO NOT agree with some of Katie’s choices,but she’s not my kid,BUT i do believe T/K love her very much and for people to say she is better off with CPS…Well that’s just silly!!!

Street Walkers @ 11/21/2009 at 8:15 pm

Walking the streets of NY at night in thrashed sparkly high heels, panties flashing, black shorts and sheer hose, see through top, bright pink dress summer dress with bare legs,…and a blankie.

Katie has absolutely no fashion sense at times. She looks dreadful in that shorts outfit. The jeans aren’t so bad–she actually looks put together there..

the kid is probably tired as the Lion King suggests kids be 6 or older:

AGE RECOMMENDATION

Disney on Broadway performances are recommended for a general audience. As an advisory to adults who might bring young people, Disney recommends its productions for ages 6 and up. All persons entering the theatre, regardless of age, must have a ticket. THE LION KING runs approximately two hours and forty-five minutes, including a fifteen-minute intermission.

A Hetero Father @ 11/21/2009 at 8:30 pm

would flip out if his little girl went out dressed like Suri. …and Kate holding Suri with her butt showing. why is Tom okay with this? for the first time it is obvious to me that tom is gay. he is oblivious to females dressing provocatively.

how could you post the pic of her in her underwear?! it’s so rude!

The more exposure, the happier. The father loves seeing the kid’s pictures everywhere. He thought they are cute/the paps captured the real moments. I wonder Katie makes a scrapbook of Suri’s paparrazi pictures. I really wonder.

I really think they treat her like an “adult” as per Scientolo teaching and let her do whatever she wants. Going to those concerts and shows, it hurts the kids eyes and ears.

about pedophiles... @ 11/21/2009 at 8:42 pm

I know some people are going to be outraged by what I’ll say and I’m sorry about it but seriously, many pedophiles have probably started a few months ago already to masturbate over Suri’s pictures. Her parents dress her like a little woman, if not as a mini-ho most of time. The high heeled sandals, her little legs and feet not covered, the flashy summer dresses even in November, etc.
The thousands pics of her have already drawn much attention and many pedophiles surfing the web probably have already many sordid phantasmas or sexual and violent scenarios involving her.
She is an ideal image to their distorted minds, a “sophisticated” “sexualized” little girl.
It’s all the fault of the way their parents dress her and pimp her out for the paps on a daily basis.

Good for you #58 @ 11/21/2009 at 8:45 pm

You make a ton of sense. So does Katie. How could she possibly know that she and Suri would be recognized at a Broadway play? Especially when Suri is in her Miami hooker disguise and Kate is dressed as Robin in the Hood or some other man. To that matter, how could anyone who is out in public know they are out in public? I refuse to believe it until everyone wears t-shirts saying, “I’m in public.”

Why does this child always look feral? Does this household not own a brush?

Desperate Housewives @ 11/21/2009 at 8:53 pm

Katie and her greedy mother. Tacky family.

What-a-brat @ 11/21/2009 at 8:57 pm

At least she isn’t wearing some kind of kiddie g-string. Would it surprise any of you if she owned one? She is having her usual hissy because she didn’t get her way. Boo-hoo Suri. A birdie is going to poop on your lip, and your face is going to freeze that way.

pretty young girl @ 11/21/2009 at 8:58 pm

So what if she drinks from a bottle and wears high heels. Shes a little girl . If it were Shiloh Not many people would be saying negative things.

#71…I agree. Katie dresses this child like a grown ass woman. All the way down to her bare legs and heeled sandals. A Pedophiles
dream.

#76..We’ve never seen Shiloh with a baby bottle since she was and infant.
Secondly, Angie and Brad do not dress Shi like a grown woman.

That little Holmes-Cruise brat, is a Paris Hilton is the making.

I’m willing to bet anything, Isabella is not like Suri.

@76 pretty young girl

No you are right they would not be saying negative things–they’d be saying even meaner things. When Shiloh was last seen in what looked like a Halloween costume posters were saying she was a lesbian, a man stuck in a woman’s body–transgender, and she had gender issues. They said that Angie was too cheap to buy her new clothes, too self-absorbed to dress her appropriately, and so on and so on.

#76….You obviously have’nt been on a J-P kid thread recently,b/c if you had you would NOT of made that statement. The last thread that involved Shi was terrible “Why is she dressed as a boy,a HOBO” “Those kids look like that are dressed from op-shops”ETC ETC Oh the most stupid one…”Shi is def GAY” all b/c she is going through a tomboy stage. And all that is the BEST stuff,some of the other racist,despicable stuff I will not repeat.
So,dont spout off total BS-when you know nothing!!!

BTW—–JJ Take down the pantie shot of Suri,it’s wrong and preverted

Puzzled @ 11/21/2009 at 6:36 pm #34

The underwear picture is probably planned to show that Suri is no longer in diapers. Why carry a child in such a manner while she is wearing a skirt without any leggings? Katie has been carrying Suri in a ‘proper’ manner for the past months in order not to show the diapers , they are probably reading all these blogs and mags saying that Suri is still wearing diapers. well as evidence to say, Suri is not wearing diapers anymore, they probably staged a photo to prove. If this turns out true, the parents are sick and if they are listening to the PR team to stage this, they really need help.
“”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"
I thought about that too. That Katie showed her child’s crotch on purpose to show that she is not long in diapers. That is just disgraceful.

Katie is a sick mother, to expose her child’s crotch like that, just to show that she is wearing panties.

#45…Katie has always gone -out of her way to make sure Suri’s dress was down and her diaper was not showing.
Now that she has panties on, Katie is letting the world see under the girl’s dress. Don’t tell me this photo shot was not done on purpose.

Katie is a sick mother.

Green Eyes @ 11/21/2009 at 9:31 pm

Seeing this kid in heels really creeps me out!!

i live in ny and i dont see any parent making their child wear heels in this cold season. so inappropriate for this weather and for suri’s age. so weird!!

Anonymous @ 11/21/2009 at 9:33 pm

Katie is more concerned with comforting her crying child, not with paps who would take pics of a child with her underwear showing.
I think it’s wrong for that pic to be posted.
There are pics of Suri in pull-ups before so her parents weren’t hiding anything.

Green Eyes @ 11/21/2009 at 9:35 pm

Denise #18 – I agree with you 100%. Very improper, and what type of mother would hold their daughter up that way anyway, knowing pics would no doubt be taken. That is not how you hold a toddler!!!!

next time jared, please be more careful. there was no need to put that picture showing off the child’s panties without some blurring. just because the mother hasn’t got the sense to protect her daughter’s modesty it doesn’t mean you can’t..

pr person @ 11/21/2009 at 9:46 pm

Nice rain boots you pathetic piece of crappola parent! Where were those boots when it was ACTUALLY raining?!

Uggghhh! The stupid moron knows she is being photographed, she knows that her daughter has nothing (no tights, leggings, shorts, etc…) on underneath her dress, yet SHE chooses to carry her in such a manner that the photogs get a great shot of her bottom?! THAT is pathetic and disgusting!! Way to go FOOL!

Anonymous @ 11/21/2009 at 9:47 pm

Suri wears dresses made for toddlers and sometimes she likes to wear her dance shoes.
I see nothing womanly about her dresses and for those who aren’t in NYC , it was a rather nice day today, quite sunny.

i have never seen a greater, and more sadistic objectification of a little girl.

I see a lil Lohan in the making, pathetic parenting!!

@Why?: thank you, people shouldn’t be angry at Jared,that child should be wearing something underthat dress.I always put shorts under my 4 year old dresses and skirts. Besides looks at how Katie is holding her, the freak is now trying to make her daughter a sex symbol.

EXACTLY!!!! @ 11/21/2009 at 10:01 pm

pr person @ 11/21/2009 at 9:46 pm Nice rain boots you pathetic piece of crappola parent! Where were those boots when it was ACTUALLY raining?!

Uggghhh! The stupid moron knows she is being photographed, she knows that her daughter has nothing (no tights, leggings, shorts, etc…) on underneath her dress, yet SHE chooses to carry her in such a manner that the photogs get a great shot of her bottom?! THAT is pathetic and disgusting!! Way to go FOOL
——————————————————————————-
ROFLMAO!

I think Katie needs to protect herself and her family a bit more. One never saw Nicole out in public with Connor and Bella when they were little. So Tom certainly knows how to negotiate that. It will do long-term harm to Suri to be so exposed to the photographers and the media. They are like a pack of hungry animals with their camera flashes going and screaming inane comments at the little girl. It must be terrifying and also disgusting. Why would one ever walk the streets with her? Why not have her driver drive her to a secure side entrance, drive her to play dates and exit the car quickly. It’s just sad to have a beautiful child and expose her like this. No good can come from it; just falseness.

about pedophiles... @ 11/21/2009 at 10:10 pm

@Denise:
#71…I agree. Katie dresses this child like a grown ass woman. All the way down to her bare legs and heeled sandals. A Pedophiles
dream.

—————————————————————-
Pedophiles looking at Suri probably formulate in their sick minds something like “she’s shaking her little ass on the sidewalks, she thinks she’s sexy”…
In fact, the way Suri is offered to the public by Tomkat PR team (via daily arranged photo-OP) is quite disturbing. Their publicity campaign is aimed at seducing, at gaining “love” with Suri’s images.

And then just look at those “fans” posts here. Or particularly at the hundred comments from the madwoman who’s posting over and over with tens of different nicks, claiming her “love” for Suri; she is salivating on Suri’s pics and can’t hold back at all, posting her “love” 25 times per thread.
— Then what results would you expect on pedophiles? Suri must be literally salacious fodder to them.

One of the celebrity baby blogs showed Sunday Rose and Suri with the same white jacket. They had a who wore it best contest. Sunday won big time! Comments basically felt that Sunday was appropriately dressed for the weather and Suri was not.

It seems to me that Suri is ok with the paps as long as they are not in her face and screaming her name like a bunch of rapid hyenas!
I think the Cruise’s for all of the criticism they’re receiving are trying to give Suri a normal life. The child seems to love the outdoors and seems really happy as the above pics prove.
Regarding Bella
That the paps would take a pic of an an upset child and any agency would buy it is of a concern to me. The children of celebrity parents should be off limits to the paps, they were previously and should be again.

Pathetic!! @ 11/21/2009 at 10:19 pm

Hopefully Katie will take some kind of parenting class before it’s too late. High heels and baby bottles don’t mix for a kid Suri’s age.

It seems to me that Suri is ok with the paps as long as they are not in her face and screaming her name like a bunch of rapid hyenas!
I think the Cruise’s for all of the criticism they’re receiving are trying to give Suri a normal life. The child seems to love the outdoors and seems really happy as many of the above pics prove.
Regarding Bella and Conor, when they were younger the paps were far more respectful when it came to celebrity children, not so anymore.

That the paps would take a pic of an an upset child and any agency would buy it is of a concern to me. The children of celebrity parents should be off limits to the paps, they were previously and should be again.

@nm: Exactly! Objectification: To present or regard as an object
-
They present her as a cute, ultra-lovable DOLL in hope to inspire fascination.

Poor child @ 11/21/2009 at 10:31 pm

She always looks so anxious; it’s so wrong for such a young child. Poor kid, why isn’t someone protecting her?

Tom calls the paps himself @ 11/21/2009 at 10:36 pm

@Anonymous:
That the paps would take a pic of an an upset child and any agency would buy it is of a concern to me. The children of celebrity parents should be off limits to the paps, they were previously and should be again.
——————————-
The Cruises or some of their own PR persons calls the paps. Thousands of photos just prove that the paparazzi are tipped off to the comings and goings of Katie and Suri.

@105.
They don’t need to call the paps.
The paps stalk that family because they know the pics sell.

She looks just like her mother she even have her legs. Cute baby but she is a pr monkey.

@Stupid is as stupid does….:

i complete agree with this. either she is an idiot or she hates suri, but if she was an idiot, she wouldn’t stay bundled up, in a big winter coat, and ugg books while her daughter is wearing a sleeveless summer dress, and thin flats, that expose her legs. so if she knows how to take care of herself, but doesn’t do the same thing for her daughter, i think she hates her daughter. but mind you, sociopaths/abusers can seem very normal and even nice in person. their actions are just a little, cough*, way off. so i think she is sadistic toward this little girl, because she has no conscience, doesn’t feel guilty or worried that her daughter might get pneumonia, or get some other problem as a result of the cold. just like in the beginning when she was doing her play, suri would always cover her eyes when the paparazzi would wait outside the hotel’s entrance. and day after day after month, after months, she would carry suri out even though she was clearly freaked out, and people would makes posts on blogs saying how she could easily take the back door/entrance to avoid the flashing lightbulbs. but DESPITE her daughter’s emotional reactions, she cared more about the publicity. she is a sick sick person, as sick as tom if not worse..

@Anonymous:lol, did u write this with a serios face, Normal life, that’s a JOKE!

Homely is an F-list hacktress and an F-list parent. Perhaps the most inept parent in Hollyweird. And please don’t bother getting preggers again as the world can’t take that much ugly or stupidity. Dumb azz troll.

Say it like it is @ 11/21/2009 at 11:45 pm

I think Katie is not nutty,but lets Suri do as Suir pleases, noboundaries, because according to Sciencefictiontology, Suri is a mini adult. BULLS*t. but that is how these people think. The older lady in the photo with Katie is her mother.

Kaite looks a mess.Unkempt and dresses like a college student.
She looks unhappy. Unkempt. Dirty looking even .All of the weekly mags, are saying there is disruption there.Star,InTouch,Us Weekly,etc. Time will tell.

One thing is for sure,if the honeymoon,amazzzzing , UGH,over, Katie will find out how amazzzzing Tom is becauseeven though she will get tensof millions per the prenup,no Suri.

Katie really sold herself,and her little mysterious womb there toTom and the Church of Sciencfictiontology .
There is not getting out.

If she hates being photo’d so much, why does she walk everywhere?

here comes de brat.

autistic brat

I hate suri!!!!

Jared, What are you thinking!

Take down Suri’s underwear.

“Celebrity couple Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes might have thought twice about naming their daughter Suri if they’d known that it means “pickpocket” in Japanese, “turned sour” in French, and “horse mackerels” in Italian, suggest Today Translations.”

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33990563/

You people are sick to suggest Katie did that on purpose. Like she gives a rat’s @ss whether or not you know if Suri is potty trained or not. You have no idea what happened in that moment. Things happen. Maybe Suri fell and she just scooped her up. Maybe she was throwing a tantrum (and yes, EVERY 3 year old does) and Katie grabbed her whichever way she could. She could have immediately put her down a minute later but the paps had to be there and get the shot as quick as they could. The only one disgraceful here are you idiots, who have nothing better to do than dream up up conspiracy theory’s on the internet.

Celebrity children are meal tickets for the pap s****r photographers they make their money off of celebrity kids pics. Schwarzenegger should enact a law where these a-holes can’t get within a certain distance of these young children, they are just vultures. If I was famous and a parent these photogs would have a lot of busted lenses and busted heads.

# 117 (Shawna)

heck- so you are another TomKat obsessed fan.

go get a real life.

It looks like aliens have an aversion to brushes/combs!

Suri swapped her little princess shoes for boots and a back pack, or didn’t you lot notice. I’m willing to bet that Suri plays dressups all day long, and for a little girl that is so often seen with no jacket she seems remarkably healthy, give it a rest
Also Sunday Rose is not a pretty child neither is Honor Warren and thats the Truth, and the truth doesn’t mean much on this site.
Everything about Suri is beautiful, look at her eyes, her hair , her little face, everything.
Look how content and happy Suri looks before she becomes aware of the papparazzi. Everybody has a right to take thei r child to the theatre in peace including Katie Holmes.

#119 – I have a life, thanks. I have 3 children of my own to raise. I like to go on the internet after the are in bed. Horrors! I just think it is pathetic they way you vultures prey on people just trying to live their lives.

@Emma2

It sounds as though you have some sort of fascination with Suri. Suri is a VERY cute little girl, she absolutely is. However, she is NOT the second coming or the most beautiful child ever like you and some others on this site would like to pretend. I personally think IMAN & DAVID BOWIE’s daughter is the most beautiful kid in hollywood, however they are not out making sure she’s in the papers all the time nor do they dress her innapropriately for her age, like Tom and Katie do. Iman & David Bowie actually have something called COMMON SENSE, which is something Tomkat obviously lacks.

Fact of the matter is that Tom & Katie are PUBLIC FIGURES, so they WILL BE JUDGED. Period. No amount of complaining from you will change that. I personally think the way they dress Suri is wrong. Tom and Katie need to get a clue. This girl is a TOTAL SPOILED BRAT! As evidenced by the pics of her screaming and crying! And don’t tell me that it’s because of the papz either b/c i’ve seen plenty of celeb kids get photographed and they don’t act the way Suri does. But I don’t blame Suri of course for any of this. I blame Tom and Katie for their inept parenting skills. They are IDIOTS! and should NEVER EVER EVER EVER reproduce again in their lives.

Lets see:

-They don’t set boundaries
-They dress Suri like a woman, heels and all! Which yes gives pedophilles plenty of fodder! I guarantee many are looking at Suri in a perverse way due to the way her stupid, idiotic parents dress her. Sad, but true.
-They don’t seem to let her socialize with many kids her age, if any at all.

Face it. Tom and Katie are not doing a good job with Suri. Of course she aint my kid, so what do I care, right? But they are turning this one into a little spoiled diva. Wait until she gets older. Tom & Katie surely will have their hands full and they’ll have NO ONE to blame but themselves at the end of the day.

She’s made this poor child into a pedophile’s dream.

The underwear picture is probably planned to show that Suri is no longer in diapers. Why carry a child in such a manner while she is wearing a skirt without any leggings? Katie has been carrying Suri in a ‘proper’ manner for the past months in order not to show the diapers , they are probably reading all these blogs and mags saying that Suri is still wearing diapers. well as evidence to say, Suri is not wearing diapers anymore, they probably staged a photo to prove. If this turns out true, the parents are sick and if they are listening to the PR team to stage this, they really need help.
______
I agree completely.

tidbit @ 11/21/2009 at 8:23 pm

the kid is probably tired as the Lion King suggests kids be 6 or older:

AGE RECOMMENDATION

Disney on Broadway performances are recommended for a general audience. As an advisory to adults who might bring young people, Disney recommends its productions for ages 6 and up. All persons entering the theatre, regardless of age, must have a ticket. THE LION KING runs approximately two hours and forty-five minutes, including a fifteen-minute intermission.
___
Thank you.

@emma#2:
Suri swapped her little princess shoes for boots and a back pack
—————————–
Yes but see she’s crying like a little ***** and totally refuses to walk with those boots. Katie has to carry her while she’s throwing a tantrum.

And the way she has that poor kid’s hair she could very well be the little lion in The Lion King herself.

A Hetero Father @ 11/21/2009 at 8:30 pm

would flip out if his little girl went out dressed like Suri. …and Kate holding Suri with her butt showing. why is Tom okay with this? for the first time it is obvious to me that tom is gay. he is oblivious to females dressing provocatively.
_____
A plausible observation.

christine (WeHo) @ 11/22/2009 at 1:30 am

@LuckyL:
OOOHHH, ‘LUCKYCHARMS’… U DISAPPOINT ME. AND I THOUGHT U WERE 1 OF THE NORMAL ONES HERE.
TO THINK!
A FAN OF JOLIE COULD SAAAY SSSUCH A THING ABOUT A LITTLE GIRLY GRL LIKE SURI & HER MOM.
TSK, TSK… BELLEVUE HOSPITAL MENTAL PATIENT….

I didn’t read all the posts, but I think someone that works at this Jared site should take down the photos of Suri that show her panties. That is just not right to put a childs photo online. It isn’t Katie’s fault. I don’t think she even knows that they can be seen. As we all see, Suri is upset and Katie is just trying to get her out of the way of the paps. Shame on you Jared…….

anniefannie @ 11/22/2009 at 1:45 am

There is a picture of me crying, at 4 years old. My dad was holding me just like Katie is holding Suri in that photo. However, I was wearing tights in the photo.

That pic of Suri crying reminded me of that picture of me.

@Why?:

You are really stupid, Katie can’t control who takes photos of her. These paps are waiting for her night and day….. All she was doing was walking on the street with her daughter who is obviously upset about something.

completely agree. she is so jealous of suri and the attention she gets. i’ve noticed how she blames everything on her: she dresses herself, i had to put my career on hold to be a mother, she won’t were a coat… or katie will say crazy things about suri to get her next lame gig: “suri’s favorite city is new york” (suri was 1) “suri loves american idol” “suri loves to dance” “suri’s inspires my designs…she loves fashion”
.
the most suspicious thing is how she RARELY smiles at suri or have eye contact. suri obviously has a developement disorder. suri isn’t able to be the child star stage mother katie would like.

#134, When has Katie EVER complained about putting her career on hold for Suri. I’ve never heard her mention that at all. And yo0ur post makes absolutely no sense. she is jealous of the attention Suri gets then she wouldn’t take her out or talk about her so much.

I think Katie is a good Mother. She is learning as she goes, but that is only natural, there is no manual on how to raise kids. You learn as you go. You can read book after book on child rearing, but who is to say they have all the answers? If Katie was such a horrible Mother, and didn’t love Suri with all her heart, she would just have hire someone to take care of her 24/7. I never have seen Suri in the care of someone else other than she or Tom. I think Suri is too old for bottles still, but who am I to judge?

@to 108: WTF are you on about???she “obviously” has a mental impairment! Obvious to who…YOU! And the above poster is right..If Katie was jealous,then she would not take her out so much and I’ve NEVER heard KH say anything about having to put her career on hold! Just b/c you think it,does NOT make it FACT!
And most kids throw tantrams,but not all parents are followed 24/7 by the paps!!
I DO NOT agree with TC/KH child raising ideas,but I don’t doubt that they love her very much!!

# 29 says Not In Nine Everyone else is. Begged to be cast. Marshall can’t stand her.

# 29, what have you read or heard? More juicy details, please. Thanks. In addition, Tommygurl is a deaf and blind, if he thinks his sloppy 3rd wife could act, sing, or dance.

hell will be too crowded for the haters here (few ones that use different names)

Great family of values and Happy Thanksgiving to them all!

Most beautiful family and happy one that is.

Cannot wait for their movies one by Katie and also Tom.

LOVE
THEM
AS
ALWAYS

There’s a deadly reciprocity awaiting those that attack this family.Treating others well in words and deed ppl respond in kind. Bad false judgments on others eventually visits you back in return.

just saying @ 11/22/2009 at 2:51 am

Katie and her family…..patriots
lowlives…..pinheads

Lisa2: Regarding your comments: It IS Katie’s fault. Katie is wearing stockings herself, so why is Suri not wearing leggings? What dumb mother would let a 3 year old out in that pink mini summer dress
(which falls above the knees) out in mid November? With open heels and bare leggs too! What’s next??? Suri may decide to go commando, if there is no parental guidance for the the mini adult. What an effing clueless mother. The Cankle Queen sold her soul to the Scientology Midget for money and pr. What a talent challenged *****. P.S. fyi, Suri has been seen with a nanny.

To #138
This is from July 2007:

“The New York Post’s Page Six reports that both Katie Holmes and Demi Moore are keen on landing roles in the upcoming film version of Nine, directed by Tony- and Oscar-nominee Rob Marshall and brought to the screen by producer Harvey Weinstein.

“The wife of Tom Cruise and mother of little Suri did a singing and dancing audition in Marshall’s office on Tuesday.”

No one was cast at the time. She must have died when the cast was formed. It’s like the Hate Katie Club. This whole Nine rejection is where her crazy So YouThink You Can Pose crap came from. I guess she showed them!

Looks like Suri got a new pair of heels with the straps not cut off. It is one thing to let a little girl play in her make believe, dress up shoes but they should not allow them to walk the streets in them. That is so unhealthy for developing feet, ankles, knees, etc. How incredibly stupid. It would only take one small mis step on the street to totally twist her ankle. Cannot believe how dumb of a mother she is. You don’t even have to be smart to know how wrong this is and just creepy.

PART 2: The Rejection
.
“Zeta-Jones was attached to play Claudia, the alluring muse of skirt-chasing director Guido Contini in the latest incarnation of Federico Fellini’s 1963 classic, “8½.”

She was due to join an impressive cast: Javier Bardem as Guido, Sophia Loren as Guido’s mother, Penelope Cruz as his mistress Carla, and Marion Cotillard as Luisa Contini. (Katie Holmes reportedly was heartbroken when Marshall turned her down for a part.)”

katie wanted Penelope Cruz’s part

139 to 144. Same name changing troll for 6-7 posts. Usa, Leggs, Usana, Cupcakes, Amway… etc. your a pathetic, demented, delusional, worthless Loser.

TomKat and said pinhead troll: unpatriotic, clueless and possibly all inbred too.

TomKat critcs: rich blessings and heavenly karma

PART 3: The Rub
.
Nicole Kidman replaces Zeta-Jone and the film is a MASTERPIECE!
.
The End

they are just beyond adorable:)

The more I respect and side with this family when I see how some nuts are so heartless and disgusting.Lowest of the low.

sweetiepie @ 11/22/2009 at 3:27 am

its a totally inappropriate life for a 3 year old child.

she wears high heels, its november and she doesn’t wear tights, she is always up late, cause there are a lot of photos in the night of her and so on…

and she shouldn’t be presented to the paparazzi in this way. many other parents in this business manage it, that their children aren’t photographed every day.

YAY! Jared finally took the photo down. What took you so long?

To 147, 149. Thanks for the details. Isn’t it hilarious that 2 of Tommygurl’s Academy Award WINNING exes are cast in Nine! Veteran singer and shapely long leggs Nicole K. and sexy Penelope C. I love Daniel and Marion too. In addition, I am soooo glad that the Cankle Queen was not cast in the movie. REJECTED. Moreover, Homely is so lacking in the talent department and has ZERO sex appeal! Pigeon toes, poor posture, weird proportions and all. Furthermore, I think my eyes and ears would bleed. And I know others would feel the same. Ahahhhh lol. P.S. Homely STUNK on SYTYD too.

Regarding: 1 TomKat fan, 6/7 diff. posts.

#139 to 144. Same name changing troll for 6-7 posts. Usa, Leggs, Usana, Cupcakes, Amway… etc. your a pathetic, demented, delusional, worthless Loser.

TomKat and said pinhead troll: unpatriotic, clueless and possibly all inbred too.

TomKat critcs: rich blessings and heavenly karma

——————————————————————————————–
Add ysl #153 to the list too. What a low brow, brown nosing loser! What’s there to respect regarding the pr and money wh*ores?

Not Impressed by JA @ 11/22/2009 at 4:33 am

That first picture is cute but i agree, she looks like a sexualized little girl. She looks like Carrie Bradshaw mini version in Sex in the City walking fierce in tye streets of NY.
.
Even the attitude and her walk scream now : WOMAN.
.
That’s so freaky and so wrong !

anja paps @ 11/22/2009 at 5:38 am

poor suri =( her parents who should be blamed!

blankies and kids @ 11/22/2009 at 6:03 am

@Anne:

Well Zahara is 4, correct? a yr older and she is ALWAYS clutching her blankie, always..as does the little tom boy sometimes. It’s none of yours or anyone’s business if children under 5 cling to a blanket. on this thread, all posters love to do is tear down, children, for the most stupid reasons! believe me, Suri has the life many children would love, leave it alone already.

z-shi-do the same @ 11/22/2009 at 6:10 am

@rainbow:

Right on! Yet, the other family dresses the little girl same age as this child, in boys clothing, carrying swords. So that child loves to play boy stuff, or wishes she was a boy, whatever…this Suri loves playing dress up like mom…what’s the big deal? And note..you will NEVER see anyone on here critize Angie for making (yes she does), encouraging, whatever, her little girl dressing like a boy, down to fugly shoes, whatever, that’s their business, just like this little girl who seems to love to dress up like mommy. Believe me, this child is well taken care of, the best of everything, and loved. and thats’ all that matters. Just once, wouldn’t you like to see the other family put down for dressing a girl like a boy, and I mean all boy? Never happen. lol. And, lets not forget the crtizing of Suri carrying a blanket, well, Zahara is older and carries one, Nothing Said! As does Shi, sometimes, with her boy gear.. Suri carries one, and it’s “How dare she”!@…But Imagine if Katie dressed Suri like a Boy???? OMG!!!! This thread would have to close LMAO! You bet! Hypocrites JP Fans Inc. you better believe they are. One sided, to the point of being sick, if you ask me.

I believe that there are a lot of AJ fans and Kidman fans here too , they can’t stand the fact that Suri is cuter , and for that matter Katie too’
For Halloween the Jolie pitt kids were dressed as dead Vietnamese soldiers or something, and the little girls favourite toy is a sword. exactly , no complaints from anyone, if there were any its only 2 or 3 as opposed to Suri
There is nothing beautiful about a woman who is always dressed in black and looks like a witch, its hard to comprehend, but she is a do gooder or something, mostly doing good for herself.
And whats more if the Jolie kids were taken out to various things the paps would be there to capture the scene, but it looks like they are the ones that are isolated. Suri gets taken everywhere, its a shame the paps spoil it for her. agree there should be a law that says the paps have to stay a certain distance from the kids. So what if Katie didn’t get the role in Nine, she’s not the first , or the last actress that its happened too, its also happened many a time to you precious Kidman too.

I wonder if it bothers Chris Klein that his kid is being pimped out and not dressed appropriately. Abused actually.

Anonymous @ 11/22/2009 at 8:12 am

The paps taking of pictures of celebrity children should be outlawed!

The paps stalking celebrity children should be outlawed because this is what this is with Suri Cruise, it’s stalking!

Why should her parents be forced into hiding her because they’re being harassed by increasingly pushy paps who know no boundaries and will dsiregard all llevels of decency for a pic.

Suri seems lke such a happy, carefree child when not harassed by the paps.

@LuckyL:

The underwear picture is probably planned to show that Suri is no longer in diapers. Why carry a child in such a manner while she is wearing a skirt without any leggings? Katie has been carrying Suri in a ‘proper’ manner for the past months in order not to show the diapers , they are probably reading all these blogs and mags saying that Suri is still wearing diapers. well as evidence to say, Suri is not wearing diapers anymore, they probably staged a photo to prove. If this turns out true, the parents are sick and if they are listening to the PR team to stage this, they really need help.
______
I agree completely.

Read more: http://justjared.buzznet.com/2009/11/21/katie-holmes-suri-cruise-lion-king-broadway/comment-page-5/#comments#ixzz0XbBU4pS2
_______

So do I.

Suri is such a cute little girl and I always liked all her outfits. But I was really disapointed when I first saw her in highheels!! I totally agree high heels is way too much, a mother should never allow that! She is so small and so cute!!

@Beatriz:

Not really, Suri’s bottoms are quite big consider her age.
Heck, don’t blame me, Homely the beard flashed her to the cameras.

Why is that child wearing heels?

Absolutely disgusting parenting.

Heels were designed for women to make their hips sway more when they walked, make their legs look longer and their bottom more pert. Why does a 3 year old need this?!

I’m sure she’ll be a little tart when she’s older. And Holmes will have no one to blame but herself.

I feel sorry for Suri she has to wear trendy clothes…

http://www.mayflower777.book.fr

Suri seems like a girly girl :)
that’s sweet, but should she be wearing heels at such a young age …
i hope they don’t let her wear heels all the time even if she wanted it ..
as it’s not good for the developement of her legs and body …
she is one of the most adorable HW kids out there :)

I lover Suri’s hair. Why wouldn’t Katie want to show off her beautiful daughter.

—-
http://www.celebpsychic.com is the place for the latest celebrity psychic predictions.Check out my Taylor Lautner prediction.

@emma2

You are the one with a problem. First off all babies are cute and Suri in my opinion and many others isn’t the cutest out there. Violet Affleck, Shiloh, Honor, Sunday, and a host of others are all as cute in their own way.
You are the one that is obsessed.
Furthermore, if you look at the pics of the JP kids at Halloween, they are clearly taken as candids and not as photo ops.
You say the JP’s don’t take their kids everywhere? Weren’t you the one on the last thread or so that complained the JP kids were gypsies and were going to grow up warped never having a home? And didn’t you shut right up when someone else pointed out Suri is the gypsy this year?
Yes, you don’t see the JP kids because they are HOME out of the PAPs cameras leading normal lives with mom and dad. They are in France right now on an estate specifically purchased to afford them privacy so that their kids can grow up as normally as possible. All the kids are learning languages, take art classes etc. They have friends.
Suri is dragged around to adult oriented activities that she clearly has no interest in.
Katie Holmes sucks big time as a mother. For some reason any common sense that Tom had with Bella and Connor appears to have left in his divorce. Bella and Connor appear to be two of the most grounded, intelligent, and sweetest kids in Hollywood. So kudos to Nicole and Tom. But Suri appears to be over indulged, allowed to do whatever she wants, and appears to be a total brat.
No child is cute when she is overly tired, acting out, and allowed free reign to be a brat.
Yes, you are the one obsessed. Always bringing up Kidman and the JP’s on a TomKat thread. Somewhere in the deep recesses of what functions as a brain in your body you must know Suri most of the time isn’t exactly exhibiting normal behaviors for her a child her age.

Lovely mom and child!

Happy Anniversary Tom and Katie and enjoy Thanksgiving and the Christmas occasions.

God bless you and most of all God bless America and our troops.

anonymous @ 11/22/2009 at 1:01 pm

The trolls are pathetic breeds are are so useless. Its clear they are little in no. and use various names to make people think this world is full of downright mean people when that is not the case.

A lot of little kids “run warm” and it is difficult to make them wear what is appropriate. It’s not like she’s walking long distances. She is going from a warm building right into a warm car.

As far as the bottle goes – so what?!?!?!?! She won’t be drinking from one the rest of her life, they fly everywhere so it probably helps her ears and I’m sure her teeth are well cared for.

I am surprised at the really harsh comments here when there are far worse things you can do to your kids. At least she’s not selling them to TLC.

@anonymous

You do realize by using the name anonymous you are supporting the anit-Scientology movement don’t you?

No, she is selling her to a wider audience–the entire world through the pap photos. Katie knows that she is not as marketable alone as she is with her little pap princess.

Anonymous @ 11/22/2009 at 1:33 pm

@180
I didn’t think of it that way.

It is really sad how people can come to a website and write such disgusting things about a child. I maintain that children should be off limits for comments.
Post the pictures if you must but disable the comments.

Suri seems like a happy, loved and well cared for child.

----------- @ 11/22/2009 at 1:56 pm

The paps are stalking that family. Outright stalking them!
The picture agency owners boasts about how much money they make on Cruise family pics.

I think it’s a credit to the Cruise’s that they are trying to let Suri enjoy her outings with the paps constantly pushing a camera in the child’s face and screeching her name.
It’s disgusting what the paps are doing and the tabloids with their cover stories on this child.
It’s also disgusting that people here are labelling a toddler with names I won’t repeat!

@sonya:
do scientos celebrate Christmas? really?
maybe they have a family gathering, but Christmas? They believe in Xenu, don’t they? maybe they can remember when they believed in the meaning of Christmas, long ago. Seems hypocritical to me.

The crazy TomKat fans defending this behavior of Suri wearing high heels are as nuts and deluded as Tom & Katie themselves. You guys are not living in reality, just like your idols.

Letting a child play dress up and wear high heels around the house IS FINE! But letting a frickin’ 3 or 4 year old GO OUTSIDE with HEELS on a REGULAR basis is downright STUPID and idiotic. Anyone who thinks this is okay is a COMPLETE IDIOT!

I heart them! My heroes!!!!!

sad to see trolls spend their weekends because they are unhappy and bored spending everyday with Tom,Katie and Suri.

Not everyone who disagrees with how TomKat is raising their child is a troll you know.
Personally I am apalled at how they parade her in front of the paps on a daily basis. What kind of parent does that? Not a good one. She deserves privacy. She is powerless and cannot force her wishes on her selfish parents. She is obviously uncomfortable much of the times with the flashes and crowds and yelling. Who, but selfish parents, would CONTINUOUSLY put their child through that?
What kind of parent would allow their child to be sexualized the way they do? Heels, nail polish, colored lip gloss and dresses?
What kind of parent would continuously allow a child to wear heels even tho every podiatrist out there will tell you that a child of this age has soft bones that are still forming and heels are really really bad for them when worn continuously?
TomKat that’s who.

My advice to the lowlives – stop doing drugs.

Great family…

----------- @ 11/22/2009 at 2:53 pm

How exactly are they parading her in front of the paps?

The child is going to plays, playing in a playground, on a movie set with her parents, going to dance class, walking with her grandparents, eating cupcakes, carrying her stuffed animals, wearing her rain boots, carrying an umbrella and occasionally wears her dance shoes on the street with her mother carrying an extra pair of shoes because we see pics from the same day and she doesn’t wear those heels 24/7 or for long periods of time.

It is disgusting how the paps surround that child and a credit to her parents that they ignore it and let Suri enjoy the world around her.

Many of the pics show a very happy child. I hope that the paps back off and if they don’t they should be forced to. It’s not right how they follow that child and don’t seem to care about how they get pics or who they run over and climb over, as long as they get them.

Nowadays its forgotten what the Bible says about leaving up to God on making judgements. Do something worthwhile about your lives as in feeding the poor,comfort a friend,volunteer,adopt a pet,take care of the elderly,remember the Katrina victims and other worldwide citizens suffering than worrying what kind of parents Tom and Katie are. I dare to call all of us are not perfect people or perfect parents. I know Im not.

poor kid being sexualize by the media when all this is innocent and normal and the paparazzis always bothering them.

She’s like a little model. I like her.

Suri wearing her “heels” for a few hours is not a big deal, it isn’t like she is playing outside in them. Most of the time Katie has her in her little flat ballerina shoes or even Mary Janes. She has one pair of “heels” and it isn’t like she wears them everyday. Most little girls love to play “dress up” and walk around in their mothers shoes. In Suri’s case, her parents can afford her dress up clothes to be “real” and she can wear them out with her regular clothes. Suri has always been a girly girl wearing dresses rather than pants. She wearing nail polish is no bif deal as well, Bonnie Bell has a whole line for little girls along with some newer companies that are non-toxic like “Suncoat” and “Piggy Paints”. As far as Suri looking under dressed for the weather, she never seems to complain that she is cold because many times she is holding a blanket rather than being wrapped up in it. Most times we see her she is going in an out of buildings from cars.

This is why I quit sites like this because shame on lowlives ripping on a wonderful family especially a child.

SHAME ON YOUR SOULS.

I feel sorry for Suri. Look at Suri and then Violet Affleck and there is no question who is the happy kid. Cameras don’t lie.

----------- @ 11/22/2009 at 3:52 pm

They are both happy kids as confirmed by pics. One though(Suri) is harassed constantly by paps climbing all over themselves and others to get pics and upsetting an otherwise happy child!

You know RoRo I do everything you say from adopt a pet, take care of the elderly, do volunteer work (including working with Katrina victims) and more–and guess what–I still think Katie is an awful mom.
Go read your bible.

@Lisa Two

No Lisa Two.If you go back through the pictures Suri has at least THREE pairs of heels. These are not play heels. These are heels that are about $500/pair designed for ignorant parents like Holmes and Cruise to foist uipon their daughters not caring about the potential harm to their physical development.

Shame on you too. You have no clue what kind of parents these people are. None of us do, but you of course feel the need to preach at the rest of us because we don’t agree with your opinion.

@ Dabu
you have mixed me up with somebody else about the gypsy bit, but look what you are doing , you’re telling me the photos of the kids dressed as dead soldiers were taken out of context etc etc , you are desperately trying to make excuses on their behalf

pr person @ 11/22/2009 at 4:35 pm

“One though(Suri) is harassed constantly by paps climbing all over themselves and others to get pics and upsetting an otherwise happy child!”
________________________________
Ugghhh! If Suri is “being harrassed constantly by paps climbing over themselves” then why don’t her parents do anything about it?! Oh wait… you give them credit for “ignoring” it. Ok… so if they are being stalked and harrassed then why aren’t the ever present bodyguards/minders ruining the pictures by blocking Katie and Suri?! Ever think of that? Have also NEVER heard Katie ask the paps to back off, to please not take their pics, to leave them alone… EVER. Why not? If the paps were harrassing her and her CHILD one would think she would say something…even if it is after she has placed Suri in the car.

ignore trolls @ 11/22/2009 at 4:58 pm

Let suri be a kid.She is playing dress up.

Suri is amazing! Get her in a movie!

to those that loathe this family.Why look and read their news and pics.
You are making yourselves look moronic.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! @ 11/22/2009 at 6:22 pm

why don’t you haters STFU ……what if poor suri had pamela anderson as her mother!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

@dabu:

Sorry Dabu, but I have only seen her in the beige pair that she has on in these photos. I honestly really only remember her Mary Janes the most. Mainly her red ones or gold ones the mos ( Mary Janes that ist?

So how is Suri supposed to save us from Armageddon in the year 2012?

@lisa2
She has heels in gold, silver and beige–although these may be the gold ones. I thought the gold ones were more sparkly.

If she was really so concerned about PR, she’d know about the busybodies like you complaining about her child’s welfare, #3.

You can’t diagnose a person via photos, #5.

Don’t say such horrible things, #12!

Who’s forcing her put of the house, #12? She obviously looks happy being outside. Dress her like a doll? What does that mean? It only sounds like a good thing but you say that like a bad thing. It creeps me out that you think she’s being sexualized.

What adult dress?! Stop saying sexualized, #18! You’re sick!

Right, #20 and #21.

He’s gay and in a contract or he’s not and he’s having an affair, #25. Make up your mind!

Exactly, #27.

You’re a moron, #32.

Planned, #34 and #35? Are you insane? Of course you are. You guys are once again giving yourselves credit for Holmes’ actions.

What the hell are you talking about, #42?

You people really need to start minding your own kids and coming up to incomplete conclusions based on paparazzi photos, #44.

I know, #45.

Yeah, #64.

You’re an idiot, #70.

It’s silly enough that you accuse Holmes of not dressing her daughter in child’s clothing but she’s not sexualized, #71. She’s dressed just fine and going out in broad daylight in public doing any thing any other little girl does isn’t wrong.

And what’s Holmes or anyone else supposed to do after that. There will be pedophiles in the world no matter what anyone does and we can’t help what they do.

Feral now, #73? You keep saying she’s always dressed up like a doll!

They would defend her, now wouldn’t they, #76.

That person is just saying that if she did, you’d defend her, #78. And she’s not dressed like a grown woman!

You don’t know how either are to make an educated bet, #80.

And for every one of those idiots, there were ten people there to refute each statement, #81 and #82. TomKat gets it harder than Brangelina. It’s a fact.

What’s disgraceful and sick is you two coming to such a theory about a mother and her child, #84 and #85.

Using the older kids is a bad example, #97. Adopted kids aren’t worth jack to the paparazzi.

Did you actually ask why any tax-paying citizen and human being ever want to walk on a public sidewalk?

Quit comparing kids, #99.

Yup, #102.

Or it’s just proof that they’re the most famous family on Earth and perfect targets, #105. Like what #106 said.

Are you still going on about her name, #116?

Agreed, #117.

Why diss those poor, little kids, #121?

You don’t know a thing and those are just excises to bash them, #123.

There’s nothing provocative about how she’s dressed and she can’t help who pedophiles are attracted to, #124. It’s sick that you think a mother would so something like showing her toddler’s underwear in public for PR purposes. That observation is anything but plausible.

I don’t know where to begin cutting down the idiocy in that post, #134.

You actually believe that Holmes did that show just because she didn’t get a role in Nine, #147?

Actually, she wanted Marion Cotilliard’s part, #149.

Good point, #163.

He shouldn’t be commenting, #164!

It’s awful that you agree, #167.

How on Earth do you know how Suri Cruise OR the Jolie-Pitt kids are being raised, #174? You don’t know how good the Jolie-Pitt kids have it any more than you know if Suri Cruise is a brat with no boundaries? I happen to believe all those kids are living good lives but WE don’t know ANYTHING for SURE! (And what adult oriented activities? The closest thing we’ve seen her do that was adult oriented was visiting her parents’ sets.)

Who’s being paraded around, #188? She’s walking in public in broad daylight and the paparazzi are expectedly photographing her because she’s famous.

Dresses are a sign of being sexualized??? You people REALLy need to stop using this new attack….

These critics just don’t get it, #191.

Quit comparing kids and thinking you know what’s happening in their lives based solely on paparazzi pics, #197.

I don’t think they can legally harm the paparazzi as you’re suggesting, #204.

FIVE FIVE FIVEEEEE @ 11/22/2009 at 9:22 pm

If she was really so concerned about PR, she’d know about the busybodies like you complaining about her child’s welfare, #3. ANY PUBLICITY IS GOOD PUBLICITY. JUST SPELL MY NAME RIGHT; KATIE HOLMES

You can’t diagnose a person via photos, #5. AND YOU CAN’T EITHER.

Don’t say such horrible things, #12! IT IS HER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT.

Who’s forcing her put of the house, #12? She obviously looks happy being outside. Dress her like a doll? What does that mean? It only sounds like a good thing but you say that like a bad thing. It creeps me out that you think she’s being sexualized. SHE IS SEXUALIZED. WHAT THE HELL DO YOU THINK SEXUAL PREDATORS LOOK FOR IN A CHILD–SOMEONE THEY CAN SAY LED THEM ON AND WANTED IT.

What adult dress?! Stop saying sexualized, #18! You’re sick! NO, SHE IS REALISTIC. HEELS, COLORED LIP GLOSS, NAIL POLISH, ETC MAKE FOR A TOTAL PACKAGE.

Right, #20 and #21. GLAD JJ TOOK THEM DOWN, BUT OTHER SITES HAVEN’T. KATIE SHOULD BE MORE CAREFUL – SHE KNOWS THE PAPS ARE TAKING PICTURES. GET A BRAIN KATIE.

He’s gay and in a contract or he’s not and he’s having an affair, #25. Make up your mind! HE CAN BE BOTH.

Exactly, #27.IF TOMKAT WOULD RESPECT THIS CHILD AND NOT PIMP HER OUT CONSTANTLY THAN MOST OF THE CRITICISM WOULD GO AWAY.

You’re a moron, #32. GEE, HOW MATURE OF YOU FOUR.

Planned, #34 and #35? Are you insane? Of course you are. You guys are once again giving yourselves credit for Holmes’ actions. MOST OF US WOULDN’T PUT ANYTHING PAST TOMKAT. THEY’LL DO ANYTHING TO STAY RELEVANT AND IN THE NEWS.

What the hell are you talking about, #42? MAYBE 42 KNOWS SOMETHING YOU DON’T????

You people really need to start minding your own kids and coming up to incomplete conclusions based on paparazzi photos, #44. WHY SHOULD WE–IT IS SO MUCH MORE FUN TO MIND KATIE’S CHILD…ESPECIALLY SINCE SHE DOESN’T.

I know, #45. GLAD YOU ARE A CULT MEMBER AND COMMUNE WITH XENU SO YOU KNOW EVERYTHING FOUR.

FIVE FIVE FIVEEEEEEE @ 11/22/2009 at 9:32 pm

PART TWO……

Yeah, #64. LIKE YOU KNOW FOUR

You’re an idiot, #70. YOUR THE IDIOT. TOM SAID HE HAS TO PIMP HER OUT SO SHE’LL GET USED TO IT.

It’s silly enough that you accuse Holmes of not dressing her daughter in child’s clothing but she’s not sexualized, #71. She’s dressed just fine and going out in broad daylight in public doing any thing any other little girl does isn’t wrong. WELL FOURSIE YOU ARE OBVIOUSLY NOT A PEDOPHILE OR YOU WOULD KNOW WHAT FOLKS ARE TALKING ABOUT.

And what’s Holmes or anyone else supposed to do after that. There will be pedophiles in the world no matter what anyone does and we can’t help what they do. TRY AND RESPECT SURI’S DIGNITY? AND NOT SHOW HER PANTIES TO THE WORLD? MAYBE EVEN SACRIFICE YOUR OWN NEEDS AND KEEP HER IN A PROTECTED ENVIRONMENT?

Feral now, #73? You keep saying she’s always dressed up like a doll!
YES SHE LOOKS MORE LIKE A DOLL THAN A CHILD.

They would defend her, now wouldn’t they, #76. NO FOUR THEY WOULDN’T. THE THINGS WRITTEN ABOUT THE JP KIDS ARE FAR FAR WORSE THAN WHAT IS WRITTEN ABOUT SURI.

That person is just saying that if she did, you’d defend her, #78. And she’s not dressed like a grown woman! SURI IS TOO DRESSED LIKE A GROWN WOMAN–LIP GLOSS, HEELS AND A DRESS? NOT EVEN A CHILD’S DRESS.

You don’t know how either are to make an educated bet, #80. I THINK WE KNOW ENOUGH TO KNOW ISABELLA ISN’T A BIT LIKE SURI! EVERYONE WHO HAS MET HER FROM RUSSELL CROWE TO KATIE HERSELF HAS SAID HOW SWEET SHE IS AND HOW INTELLIGENT ISABELLA IS. KUDOS ARE PROBABLY DUE NICOLE FOR KEEPING TOM’S CRAZINESS AWAY FROM BELLA AND CONNOR WHEN THEY WERE SMALL.

And for every one of those idiots, there were ten people there to refute each statement, #81 and #82. TomKat gets it harder than Brangelina. It’s a fact. HAHAHA. NO IT ISN’T A FACT–YOU JUST WANT IT TO BE. BRANGELINA HAS IT A HUNDRED TIMES WORSE. JUST GO TO IAN HALPERIN’S BLOG FOR MEANESS OR FEMALE FIRST. OR DLISTED. OR PEREZ HILTON. BEFORE YOU GIVE AN OPINION AND IT IS AN OPINION, MAYBE YOU SHOULD RESEARCH YOUR ANSWER. YOU ARE DEFINITELY A SCIENTOLOGIST OR YOU HAVE A MAD CRUSH ON TOMMY.

What’s disgraceful and sick is you two coming to such a theory about a mother and her child, #84 and #85. FOUR IS SICK ‘CAUSE HE BELIEVES TOMKAT DOESN’T USE THE CHILD FOR PUBLICITY.

Using the older kids is a bad example, #97. Adopted kids aren’t worth jack to the paparazzi. BS ON YOU FOUR. BOTH BELLA AND CONNOR ARE WORTH A LOT MORE TO THE PAPS THAN YOU WOULD THINK. THEY’D LOVE TO GET THE TWO OF THEM TO DO SOMETHING THAT WOULD EMBARRASS TOM.

Did you actually ask why any tax-paying citizen and human being ever want to walk on a public sidewalk? KATIE WANTS TO WALK ON THE SIDEWALK WITH SURI TO SHOW HER OFF. SHE IS A HORRIBLE EXAMPLE OF HOW TO RAISE A CHILD.

Quit comparing kids, #99. DON’T QUIT #99

Yup, #102. NOPE, #102–ANYONE ALIGNED WITH FOUR IS SUSPECT.

Or it’s just proof that they’re the most famous family on Earth and perfect targets, #105. Like what #106 said. NO THEY ARE NOT THE MOST FAMOUS FAMILY ON EARTH. BRANGELINA HAS THAT HONOR. AS DID PRINCESS DI AND JACKIE O. TOMKAT IS DEFINITELY NOT.

Are you still going on about her name, #116? WY NOT?

Agreed, #117. DISAGREE ON PRINCIPLE.

Why diss those poor, little kids, #121? WHY DO YOU DISS EVERYONE WHO DOESN’T AGREE WITH YOU FOUR?

FIVE FIVE FIVEEEEE @ 11/22/2009 at 9:41 pm

PART III REFUTING FOURSIE

PART THREE REFUTING FOURSIE

You don’t know a thing and those are just excises to bash them, #123. HER POST IS JUST AWESOME AND MAGICAL. SAYS WHAT EVERYONE IS THINKING.

There’s nothing provocative about how she’s dressed and she can’t help who pedophiles are attracted to, #124. It’s sick that you think a mother would so something like showing her toddler’s underwear in public for PR purposes. That observation is anything but plausible. KATIE HAS NO COMMON SENSE, SO YOU ARE RIGHT SHE PROBABLY DOESN’T DO IT ON PURPOSE. SHE IS STUPID.

I don’t know where to begin cutting down the idiocy in that post, #134 NOT IDIOCY AT ALL. KATIE MARRIED TOM THINKING HER CAREER WOULD SKYROCKET LIKE NIC’S DID. KATIE FORGOT THAT NICOLE CAN REALLY ACT, SING AND DANCE. THAT NICOLE HAS TALENT AND KATIE DOES NOT. ALL THE MONEY IN THE WORLD IS NOT GOING TO BUY KATIE THE ACCLAIM SHE WANTS AS AN ACTRESS–SO LET’S USE SURI INSTEAD FOR ATTENTION!!!

You actually believe that Holmes did that show just because she didn’t get a role in Nine, #147? YOU BETCHA.

Actually, she wanted Marion Cotilliard’s part, #149. EITHER WAY, SHE DIDN’T GET IT.

Good point, #163. NO POINT AT ALL. THE JP KIDS–MOST OF HTE PHOTOS ARE CANDIDS YOU CAN TELL BY THE DISTANCE AND THE GRAININESS OF MOST OF THE PHOTOS. AND GEE MOST OF TOMKATS PHOTOS ARE CLEAR AS DAY JUST AS IF THEY POSED FOR THEM.

He shouldn’t be commenting, #164! AND WHY SHOULDN’T HE BE COMMENTING? BECAUSE IT IS CONTRARY TO WHAT YOU BELIEVE? HE HAS EVERY RIGHT TO COMMENT. TO WARN PARENTS OF THE DANGERS IN CASE THEIR CHILD SEES THE IDIOT PARADING HER PET AROUND IN HEELS AND WANTS HEELS TOO.

It’s awful that you agree, #167. WE ALL AGREE EXCEPT YOU AND TWO OR THREE OTHERS.

How on Earth do you know how Suri Cruise OR the Jolie-Pitt kids are being raised, #174? You don’t know how good the Jolie-Pitt kids have it any more than you know if Suri Cruise is a brat with no boundaries? I happen to believe all those kids are living good lives but WE don’t know ANYTHING for SURE! (And what adult oriented activities? The closest thing we’ve seen her do that was adult oriented was visiting her parents’ sets.) WELL THE JP KIDS CERTAINLY HAVE A LOT MORE PRIVACY TO BE KIDS THAN SURI DOES.

Who’s being paraded around, #188? She’s walking in public in broad daylight and the paparazzi are expectedly photographing her because she’s famous. SHE SHOULDN’T BE WALKING HER AROUND LIKE A DOG. IF SHE RESPECTED SURI’S BOUNDARIES SHE WOULD DENY HERSELF A SHOPPING TRIP OR TWO AND STAY HOME AND PLAY WITH HER.

Dresses are a sign of being sexualized??? You people REALLy need to stop using this new attack…. WHY SHOULD WE WHEN YOU HAVE BEEN ATTACKING EVERYONE FOR THE LAST YEAR OR MORE THAT HAVEN’T AGREED WITH YOUR XENU PHILOSPHY

These critics just don’t get it, #191.YOU DON’T GET IT EITHER FOURSIE.

Quit comparing kids and thinking you know what’s happening in their lives based solely on paparazzi pics, #197. WELL THIS ONE I MIGHT AGREE WITH. GOD SAVE ME. I AGREE WITH FOUR.

I don’t think they can legally harm the paparazzi as you’re suggesting, #204. WE HAVE NEVER NEVER HEARD KATIE OR HER BODY GUARDS ASK THE PAPS TO BACK OFF. WE HAVE HEARD PITT TELL THEM TO BACK OFF THEY ARE SCARING ONE OF THE KIDS. WE’VE HEARD HIM TELL THEM BACK OFF THE KIDS ARE NERVOUS. WHEN HAVE WE EVER HEARD TOM OR KATIE SAY BACK OFF YOU ARE FRIGHTENING SURI? EVEN WHEN SHE APPEARS FRIGHTENED.

FIVE FIVE FIVEEEEE @ 11/22/2009 at 9:42 pm

WHEW THAT WAS A LOT OF WORK DEALING WITH FOUR (FORMERLY TWO) AND HIS BLINDERS.

pr person @ 11/22/2009 at 9:53 pm

“I don’t think they can legally harm the paparazzi as you’re suggesting, #204″

Are you high?! I suggested no such thing. All the bodyguard/minders have to do is walk right in front of and right beside Holmes…in effect “blocking” the pics. DUH!!!

LOVE LOVE LOVE LOVE LOVE LOVE TOMKAT .LOVE BEAUIFUL LITTLE SURI.

end is near @ 11/23/2009 at 12:12 am

To the Kidman fans and some Angie Brad fans mocking this family. I pity you loons.Seek God or seek help.

That sounds a little impractical and over-the-top, #217.

christine (WeHo) @ 11/23/2009 at 4:07 am

@!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:
LOLOL.. ..
oh man then suri would hav2 endure seeing crooked nipples all day
(frm the plastic surgery)

Whats the deal with the commentator above talking about each comment. Thats a lot of replie! LOL. Suri is amazing. She should be starring in movies soon. Tom looks like a college student!

I HATE THIS FAMILY! Suri is an ugly pimped out kid, Cankle is nothing more than a pigeon toed, sickly looking, untalented gold digger, and Cruise NEVER was a good actor. And as far as Cruises looks, well, he never was hot and he has gone way down hill since then. HATE THEM!!!!! Wish they would just get on their space ship with their stupid tiny tin-foil hats and LEAVE!!!!!!!

wow shocking Suri and many babies wanting to look like their moms.
idiots and lowlives much?

phillygobby @ 11/23/2009 at 8:50 pm

Munchausen by proxy, Thanks JJ !!

yazlongfellow @ 11/23/2009 at 9:06 pm

TomKat critics are so Jackie O !

#160 and #161: oh please look at the size of the blankets. Shi and Z have tiny blankets and Suri has a whopper white blankey that sweeps the floor. Imo, Suri looks like an ugly azz troll who’s going to inherit her mother’s cankles, ugly droopy eyes and nasty bunions too. Moreover, Shi can dress as she pleases. Shi is pretty much always happy. Bipolar Suri, is a pedephile’s dream and will grow up to be the next Lindsey Blowhan. TomKat fans are unpatriotic, pathethically jealous, delusional low brow losers.

You’re disgusting, #227

So will htere be an arranged marriage for Suri as well?

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here