Top Stories

Daniel Craig Reads 'The Royal Hunt of the Sun'

Daniel Craig Reads 'The Royal Hunt of the Sun'

Daniel Craig leaves a meeting at a private residence in Hollywood on Friday (May 14).

The 42-year-old actor carried a copy of The Royal Hunt of the Sun, a play by Peter Shaffer – it’s about the destruction of the Inca empire.

Earlier this week, Daniel was spotted out and about with a copy of Tennessee WilliamsCat On a Hot Tin Roof.

10+ pictures inside of Daniel Craig leaving a home with The Royal Hunt of the Sun

Just Jared on Facebook
daniel craig the royal hunt of the sun 01
daniel craig the royal hunt of the sun 02
daniel craig the royal hunt of the sun 03
daniel craig the royal hunt of the sun 04
daniel craig the royal hunt of the sun 05
daniel craig the royal hunt of the sun 06
daniel craig the royal hunt of the sun 07
daniel craig the royal hunt of the sun 08
daniel craig the royal hunt of the sun 09
daniel craig the royal hunt of the sun 10
daniel craig the royal hunt of the sun 11

Photos: GSI Media
Posted to: Daniel Craig

JJ Links Around The Web

Getty
  • Disney CEO reacts to Johnny Depp's divorce - US Weekly
  • Sinead O'Connor has been put on suicide watch - TMZ
  • Demi Lovato rants about teens' celeb obsessions - Gossip Cop
  • Taylor Swift goes on another date with Tom Hiddleston - Just Jared Jr
  • Blac Chyna reveals her wedding plans - Radar
  • Michael Strahan gets in a dig at Live! - Huffington Post
  • Can you solve this new celeb blind item? - Lainey Gossip
  • JK Rowling reacts to the shocking news in Britain - The Hollywood Reporter
  • to 99 & 100

    @to 85 & 87:
    Not what I heard.

    @to 97:

    Both the Daily Mail and The Sun (editors desk) have told me they they have NOT searched for his marriage certificate because they really are waiting for someone else to do the leg work and they really feel it’s not newsworthy.
    Yes, that’s what they told me.

  • to people

    Look, this is not the 1st gay bar he been seen at,, he seems to go quite often.
    he has alot of gay male friends, where are his straight friends?
    the question is really, why does he keep going?
    ———————————————————————————–
    hello!!!! has it not occured to you that daniel may be meeting up with his straight friends at the gay bar?? happens all the time. my straight friends and i go to the gay bars more often than we go to the so called straight bars. that’s because we find the gay bars a lot more fun. yes, we have gay friends in our circle but that doesnot me or my straight friends are gay. anymore than it makes daniel gay. just because a bar is labelled “gay” doesnot mean that everyone in there is. what part of this do you not understand??

  • re; babies

    I think that Daniel wanted marriage and a kid but simply he has changed his mind about both.He’s allowed to do that.
    If he had no intention of children he should not have talked about it in an interview although maybe at that time he wanted them.

    Satsuki will accept the compromise which is what she is appearing to do. That is lifestyle, fame by proxy and money by proxy and she would willingly accept being with him and loving him (w/o marriage and kids) than being without him.

    That’s the way the cookie had cumbled for her but let’s face it, it’s not a tough cookie is it?

  • to 102

    @to people:

    You know the more times you make the same point with rudeness, is the time people stop listening.

  • to 104

    i’m not #102. i have to say i agree with you, he/she is somewhat rude in this post. i don’t know if that was the intention here but that’s how it turned out. but having said that, i do get what this person is saying. just wish it had been said a little nicer.

  • Mendel

    No Dan news as far as I can tell, but I found this interesting article:

    http://www.nj.com/entertainment/movies/index.ssf/2010/05/whither_john_wayne_robert_downey_jr_and_matt_damon_cant_hold_a_candle_to.html

    It ties in to what ‘How’ said in post #50 & 53

    ‘Daniel is oozing sex from every single pore and has that certain something what seperates the men from the boys’

  • Bond Candidate

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/2010/05/16/shirtless-henry-cavill/

    Rumor that Henry is on the list to replace Daniel.

  • to 107

    @Bond Candidate:

    You’re way behind the times, Cavill been’s in the mix since 2005.
    Old news.

  • to 105

    There they are again on #108. Same rude condescending tone. Her way or the highway! LOL where have I heard read that before?

  • to 109

    @to 105:

    But Cavill has been. Read back. They are making a valid point based on facts.
    #102 posted a far worse post based on nothing.

  • Dan’s dad on Twitter

    - The reason two antelope walk together is so that one
    can blow the dust out of the eyes of the other.

    - A pineapple is a berry. That may be so but I’d sooner sit on a berry.

    - Encountering the dairy herd & an electric fence this morning while walking the dog, I bethought me it’s a good job cows can’t limbo

  • Dan’s dad on Twitter

    http://a1.twimg.com/profile_images/757944164/web_pic_bigger.JPG

    Dan is getting to look like him more and more

  • to 101

    they may not have but other news outlets have,
    and found nothing. if he got married he would not allow anyone to deny it.

  • to 113

    @to 101:

    Really which news outlets then? Love to know! Put a name to these if you can’t then you are lying.

    On the other note then the people coming on here saying the UK papers have were lying.

    Bunch of liars one after another on here.

  • to 113

    ET
    tmz
    abc news
    nbc news
    extra
    acess hollywood
    national enquire
    star
    people
    us
    just a few news outlets, when the story 1st broke.

  • to 113

    Oh and one other thing these papers told me, they need the country, location in it, certain date and time to search.
    The certificate does not come up simply under their names in any country. You need to zoom in on the county, the city, pertinent details. etc etc.

    Both of these papers said they were simply not going to waste their time if no-one could give specifics. It also isn’t newsworthy apparently.

    What does that tell you?

    The guy I spoke to at The Sun really gave the impression that this subject was a very faded one. He wasn’t interested.

  • to 113

    @to 113:

    Sorry don’t believe it.
    As for TMZ, I already spoke to them when the story broke and they emailed me back stating they needed specifics.
    I will contact some of the rest of them tomorrow.

    All of them require the details of which I posted in my post of 116.

    This is not to prove they are married simply that these media outlets need specific details to search therefore if they did have those, we would be looking at a wedding certificate right now.

    My point is to prove that people lie on here about any search being performed and because of this we are none the wiser irrespective of any source’ close to Daniel’ coming forward.

    I have spoken to Gossipcop.com about this ‘source’. I’ve been in this game far too long to say how I feel about that particular ‘story’.

  • to 113

    @to 113:

    Sorry none of the major news outlets have performed any search. They just kidnapped the story from other places.
    If you look carefully, it was one story just passed around like a bowl of dip.
    Yes I know for 100% certain that the major outlets did not perform searches.

  • to 118

    I spoke with several people at abc , et tmz , they all said they had no proof of a marriage. if you want to belive they are married then belive it.

  • to 119

    @to 118:

    Again, I am NOT saying they are, please read carefully before accusing.

    Do not twist what I am posting to suit your own ends.

    I will recontact the mentioned outlets tomorrow. I know that ABC certainly did not search.

    Saying ‘no proof of marriage’ is an easy veil with which to hide behind.
    If you can see beyond your on ‘logic’, that means they have no proof, it does not mean they have searched for they have no details with which TO search.

    Use your common sense please and read between the lines and stop falling for the same excuse the media gives you. I have given the same excuse during my career.

  • re; 117

    i believe you, i dont think they’re married but i dont think anyone has really searched. how can they, they dont have a clue where to start. you cant do it with names only.

  • to 101 re: Daily mail

    @to 99 & 100: @to 97:
    Both the Daily Mail and The Sun (editors desk) have told me they they have NOT searched for his marriage certificate because they really are waiting for someone else to do the leg work and they really feel it’s not newsworthy.
    Yes, that’s what they told me.
    _________________________________________________
    Really? Are you sure that is what they told you because the Daily Mail newspaper is the one who first posted the article about Daniel’s ‘so-called’ secret wedding in the first place. So why would they deem it ‘not newsworthy’ if they posted an article about it in their paper?
    They also said that a ‘source’ came forward. So if the Daily Mail printed that ‘secret wedding’ story , then of course it must be newsworthy to them . The Daily Mail, and other papers like the Sun and others, do not care about finding any wedding certificates. No fact checking. All they are interested in doing is posting phony and false secret wedding stories.
    They are being caught over and over posting false stories.

  • share with you

    some guys keep claiming hugh and daniel sleep with each other during ASR. one claimed seeing them at an adult video shop.

    i don’t believe it but just to share with u …

  • to 122 and 123

    @to 101 re: Daily mail:

    Yes I am sure. Yes they posted the story but without evidence of a valid marriage. They based it on supposition (she was wearing an engagement ring then the “bands’ appeared, therefore jumping to the ‘obvious’ conclusion) and some ‘sources.
    They did not search for a certificate, if they did they would have printed it to concrete their story as was told to me.
    They NO longer deem it their effort to search for valid proof.
    They also did not print the other source denying they married as gossipcop did.

    @share with you:

    ‘Some guys’ being whom?

  • to 122 and 123

    Maybe all of you taking your time to post on here trying to justify your theories, call the UK papers up and ask them.
    They will all tell you the same as I.

  • to share with you

    I wish Daniel and Hugh accuse you of slander.

  • to 120

    I spoke with the senior producer at ET
    they told me that they had no proof that a marriage took place.
    spoke with the Entertainment reporter at ABC, and their news desk, no proof .
    TMZ, same thing nothing.
    as far as we know you could be doing the lying.

  • I

    spoke with GOD, he told me it’s nobodies bussiness

  • Gossip Cop

    At least Gossip Cop has the biggest and baddest ba*ls to call these lying tabloids out on their sh**te and set the record straight. Gossip Cop really has nothing invested in which celebrity couple marries and which ones don’t. They could care less who will marry or who won’t. When they get the inquiry on a story, they just do the research and tell it as they see it. Every day they are calling out the Daily Mail, the Sun, Life & Style, Us Mag, People mag, Perez Hilton etc. and call them liars for printing false fabrications about these celebrities.

  • to 124

    there where many news outlets that did a search and turn up nothing.
    just because, they haven’t shared that info with you doesn’t mean that havem’t looked.
    and you really need to get a grip. there is no proof a wedding took place.
    you spoke with 2 of the worst news outlets that are running, the fact that they didn’t bother to check tells you what kind of news opps they are running.
    the other news opps that I spoke with, (people I have known for over 20years) will not run a story without proof. (IE statment from the party)
    or wedding certificate. that is why alot of news outlets dropped the story.

  • to 124

    there where many news outlets that did a search and turn up nothing.
    just because, they haven’t shared that info with you doesn’t mean that havem’t looked.
    and you really need to get a grip. there is no proof a wedding took place.
    you spoke with 2 of the worst news outlets that are running, the fact that they didn’t bother to check tells you what kind of news opps they are running.
    the other news opps that I spoke with, (people I have known for over 20years) will not run a story without proof. (IE statment from the party)
    or wedding certificate. that is why alot of news outlets dropped the story.

  • lol

    why care? this dude is crazy bi! just look at his lady and hugh jackman is another bi actor- nobody knows if he is realy straight or not.

  • to lol

    Everyone knows you to be interested only in it. lol!!!

  • Project B Rationale

    The Adventures of Gub the Penguin

    I chose to do a Geo-Narrative for Project B. This was because I am a creative person and would much prefer to tell a story than to display information. I encountered a problem early in that I had recently lost my camera and so was unable to use my own images in the way that i had planned. I overcame this problem by using a variety of public domain and copyleft/ share and share alike images that I found on the internet, and photoshopping them heavily. It basically involved two sets of images; the characters (namely a variety of Emperor Penguins as Gub, John Howard as Tulio and Daniel Craig as Dick the Head).

    I chose John Howard and Daniel Craig as the faces for my human characters because they are heavily photographed people and a lot of the images of them available are in the public domain.

    For the story itself I wanted something funny and bizarre; the sort of thing Monty Python would do. And I felt it was important that I have several characters on several separate journeys that ran parallel to each other. In addition to this I wanted there to be a surprise at the end, so I introduced the John Howard character as a Master of Disguise. This allowed me to have some fun and introduce the “Where is Tuilo…” aspect. The humour therein lies, of course, in the fact that it is very obvious where Tulio is. This also allowed me to have the surprise ending with the final image of Gub being Tulio in disguise.

    I had initially intended to use the lines in Google Maps to show every place the characters travelled, but this proved too difficult and I was running out of time. Not to mention that there are no commercial airlines that do flights to antarctica; or at least none that have a frequent flyer program. So I limited the use of the line tool to Gub’s return to antarctica, and I numbered the markers so that the narrative still had an easy to understand chronology.

    The networked aspect of my project lies most heavily in the fact that the images used were posted on flickr and embedded on google maps. Two seperate websites combined to make something new. The project could not exist without either. In addition to this there are many links to various websites for additional information on the content of the websites. Some with genuine information, and some that were simply there for the humour factor.

  • lol

    well and everyone here knows we could save us this thread if dan would suck d**** pretending to be someone hes not and you all wasting your time coming here worry about gf etc.
    Sure broccoli was tired of dans appear, another year with this wrinkle man and his nobody gf- I’m glad james bond comes back in new freshness with a sexy young actor who is able to walk the carpet alone and not be so moody all the time!!

  • to lol

    Everybody knows why anti-Daniel like you comes to here. lol!!!

  • to 135

    I’m afraid you have to wait another 2 Bond movies or so to get a sexy young actor as Bond LOL and it will not be Sam W., because by the time Daniel will leave Bond behind him Sam will be anything but young and fresh.

  • Acquiring rights

    Warner, Sony snap up market titles.
    The studios have been seeking foreign rights to stock up their international pipelines.
    http://www.screendaily.com/festivals/cannes/warner-sony-snap-up-market-titles/5014006.article

  • guinness

    OMYGAHSH… sweet baby swaddling jesus!! those tee shirts are wanting a hug and a grope!!! (i had the same one on for my trip home yesterday–a little wrinkled at the bottom–traveling shirts.)

    wow. paps everywhere in CA. and is he driving his hot 007 car? yeah, that wouldn’ t make me follow him. or is he in a Prius? if one is a celeb and doesn’t want to attract attention… drive something else maybe? whatever. (does he have the wedding ring on the necklace he wears?)

    thank you Mendel–that was an awesome article… i think it is a generational thing about machismo and comparing the characters actors are playing now from then… i think the author is wrong… Sherlock kicked some serious @ss with his moves… and WHO do I want showing up on my doorstep at 2AM??? it wouldn’ t be john freakin wayne!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    btw–I had a fantabulous excellent, brilliant, dancing, cougar-flaunting, policeman enducing, drunken, shoe ruining, every sex in the city episode, every wine and beer tasted–kick @ss weekend!!!!

  • guinness

    ah, I can’t read all the posts… but has anyone mentioned that this “private residence” looks the same as the other residence he came out of on friday?? I dont’ want him to get papped, but I do because that is only when I get to see him… so this is a double edged sword… ahhh. and his leather coat in hand… DAN——please dont stop wearing these tee shirts….ever… for love of everything sacred!!!!

  • to 140

    @guinness:

    Daniel prefers only one type of vehicle to drive.

    A bullet proof Escalade.

  • to 141

    nonsense

  • ‘wedding’ and the press

    @to 124:

    a) I am not interested whether these two are married.
    b) If these news outlets had any modicum of detail about where and when they did, they would have found a wedding certificate. Once again, you need SPECIFICS to search for it.
    c) Stop trying to turn this situation around on me. I am merely pointing out that many of these news outlets have NOT searched. The paper I work for has NOT. It can’t without specifics and will NOT print a story without concrete proof. Even more so a story concocted on a few sources saying “they might have married…” and based on his/her ‘wedding’ bands. The DM was grasping at straws.
    Yes I have contacted just about every news/media outlet I can and NONE of them have searched, NONE. They will not waste their man power searching for something without DETAILS. Their theory was, if the DM hasn’t got then we won’t find it. Indeed the DM didn’t search either. If you have some romantic theory that these papers are full of intrepeid reporters sniffing out sotires, you’re wrong. The majoroty of them sit around at desk waiting for stories to be called in.
    So the other outlets just picked up the same story the DM printed. If you check all of these outlets and ask the right questions, that is what they will say. It’s done all the time. Just because one outlet reports the story that was lifted from another does not mean any research was done. That is a lazy form of journalism and so was the DM story.

    I did however venture further into GossipCop and got to know more about this ‘source’ that denied the wedding. They didn’t reveal the source (of course) but I got the gist that it was a form of damage control. But why? Only thing I can think of was that Daniel thought by wearing the ring that things wouldn’t have become as crazy as they apparently did with the sighting of it. Someone in his office then tried to backtrack.

  • to 142

    @to 141:

    I’m sorry?

    This is what he drives whilst in L.A. He has been driving/been driven in one for a long time.
    All Escalades for celebrities are bullet proof. He drove one in NY.

    I am not saying what he owns but what he prefers whilst in L.A./NY.

    He values his safety highly and no wonder.

  • forget the wedding

    Because his agent straight up denied it . Let’s get back to discussing why he like to frequent out of the way gay bars and the private residence in Hollywood sans Sats.

  • escalade

    i agree he does. i remember seeing pictures of him getting in/out one in the past and i remember reading once that he had difficulty parking one outside a house somewhere.

    i sure the cars he owns in the UK are bullet proof to, they can add this detail now onto about every car now. it’s a special type of coating for the windows and coating for the doors. lots of people have it even non celebs, people with lots of money.

    here’s the story:
    http://jalopnik.com/234944/daniel-craig-cant-park-his-escalade

    also type in ‘daniel craig and escalade’ and it will tell you he bought one

  • to 145

    @forget the wedding:

    I don’t have full proof his agent denied it but he personal friend that was the source could have been his agent. Absolutely.
    An statement from his office is something he will not do as he never officially announced he was engaged either and by now releasing a statement will seem hypocritical.
    A “friend’ stepping forward circumvented that, ‘softened the denial”.
    One thing though, I have no doubt there isn’t any way he would have allowed that witout Satsuki’s ‘agreement’. That is one thing I am sure on.

    But why should we stop talking about it, isn’t this a free forum?

    As for him frequenting gay bars, I haven’t heard anything concrete that he is gay or even bi just the usually lazy gossip.
    As for the private residence, I am trying to find whom he visited.
    I know that the ‘meeting’ consisted of two other males. Simply could have been a business meeting. Let’s not overthink that one.
    As for Satsuki not being there, she doesn’t go to many of these as her input isn’t need for merely duscussing future projects.
    I am guessing that he does that when he gets back to her with the script/play etc.
    Then no doubt she reads it and gives her thoughts.

  • to escalade

    Thanks for the link. I had never read that article…interesting.

  • tom 143

    well, you obvious do not work in the industry, I know several people that work for Major news organizations.

    when the story 1st broke they checked with his people no one wanted to go on the record but stated that there was no marriage, they they did search,but you seemed desperate to prove there was a wedding, you are guessing as to why the person denied a marriage took place, it is what you want to believe.

  • re 143

    did however venture further into GossipCop and got to know more about this ’source’ that denied the wedding. They didn’t reveal the source (of course) but I got the gist that it was a form of damage control. But why? Only thing I can think of was that Daniel thought by wearing the ring that things wouldn’t have become as crazy as they apparently did with the sighting of it. Someone in his office then tried to backtrack.
    ————————————————————————————————his office never released a statment that they were married, so therefore there was no backtracking to be done.
    they simply denied a wedding took place. I think you are the one grasping at straws here.
    and how in the world do you know what that man thinks?
    i

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here