Top Stories

Katie Holmes: Power of Women Luncheon!

Katie Holmes: Power of Women Luncheon!

Katie Holmes joins her pint-sized Don’t Be Afraid of the Dark co-star Bailee Madison at Variety‘s 2nd Annual Power Of Women Luncheon at California’s Beverly Hills Hotel on Thursday (September 30).

The 31-year-old actress went floral in a pretty Louis Vuitton dress, black leggings, Casadei shoes, and a classic Chanel purse.

Katie was honored at the event for her work with Dizzy Feet Foundation, which helps support, improve, and increase access to dance education.

Ms. Holmes rubbed shoulders with Jennifer Garner and Kerry Washington. Earlier this month, Katie and Kerry both sat front row at the Calvin Klein fashion show during NY Fashion Week.

10+ pictures inside of Katie Holmes at the Power of Women luncheon…

Just Jared on Facebook
katie holmes variety luncheon 01
katie holmes variety luncheon 02
katie holmes variety luncheon 03
katie holmes variety luncheon 04
katie holmes variety luncheon 05
katie holmes variety luncheon 06
katie holmes variety luncheon 07
katie holmes variety luncheon 08
katie holmes variety luncheon 09
katie holmes variety luncheon 10

Credit: Steve Granitz, Todd Williamson, Jeff Vespa; Photos: Wireimage
Posted to: Bailee Madison, Katie Holmes, Kerry Washington

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen has sadly passed away at age 65 - TMZ
  • Find out why Little Mix named their new album LM5 - Just Jared Jr
  • Nicole Kidman says being married to Tom Cruise prevented her from being sexually harassed - TooFab
  • What will Prince Harry and Meghan Markle name their baby? - Lainey Gossip
  • Daya has come out as bisexual - Just Jared Jr
  • Are Scott Disick and Sofia Richie having a baby? - Gossip Cop
  • Caity

    Bailee looks like she could be Katie’s daughter!
    That dress – no, no, no Katie! Did the designer put the real dress next to the 50′s curtains and she got confused? :/

  • lavito

    Ditto to every negative comment about Katie’s dress, Suri probably made her wear out the door, at least she wore black shoes instead of those hideous taupe shoes she had on several weeks ago with a black and white dress. Katie you suck fashionista!

  • swan


    The brat is STILL wearing diapers!

    shame on the parents.

    I guess they have no control over her.

    Remember, their cult believes that the little child is a little adult and if she wants to wear diapers til she is 15…she will demand it.

  • twpumpkin


  • @star fool

    The Romantics bombed BIG time. Limited release? It’s widest release was 14 theaters and lasted 17 days and made 103,000–which is an average of $7,357 per theater or $6,053 per day. Critic reviews were mixed and viewer reviews place it as average. Katie produced this BOMB and it couldn’t even make it with the other famous names in it.

    Only someone delusional, a Katie stalker, or a paid Xenu front man could call this movie any type of success. I’ve worked in film and believe me NO ONE makes a film to lose money. EVERYONE, Katie included, makes a film hoping it will be another Blair Witch Project, Juno etc.

    This was a huge, huge bomb. As was The Extra Man. The widest release was 33 theaters and it has been playing for 59 days and has made $432,000. Which translates to $13,000 a theater or $7322 per day. Both critic and viewer reviews place it as a solid average. AND OH YES, she had a BIG SUPPORTING role.

    Again, this hardly made money. I seriously doubt in both of these movies that EVERY single ACTOR worked for SAG/AFTRA rates. There are some big names and you know they got some bucks for working in these movies. Plus the PR/Advertising budgets had to be at least $25,000 minimum. AND there is no production budget listed which usually means that the movie hasn’t made money and they don’t expect it to.

    Kids are All Right cost $4 mil to make and has made $20 mil.

    So I’d say The Extra Man and the Romantics have BOMBED BIG TIME both critically with viewers and critics as well as with the$$$$$$$$$$$$.

  • Just My Opinion

    @star fool – I completely agree with you regarding the two recent movies Katie is appearing in: The Romantics & The Extra Man
    They were both flops no matter how anyone on this thread wants to plug it. The bottomline is the boxoffice dollars and both were NOT money makers. I also see that the movie Katie made in Australia “Dont be afraid of the Dark” was going to be released September 24th but has been pushed BACK to January 2011. Some people try to boast Katie on these celebrity threads but when you read the negative comments that has some kind of warning or feeling that the majority of the public is TURNED OFF by Tom Cruise, Katie Holmes and the whole TOMKAT phenomenon or whatever they wanted to sell to the public. The public is not buying their koolaid. And the public is needed here because we are the paying public.

  • She is not Jackie

    She is not a Jackie Kennedy. She does not look like her.
    I am so fed up with hollywood choosing actresses they already know
    instead of an unknown. Someone gives Katie the role to play Jackie
    and she already has an attitude about it. You are not Jackie.
    Michelle Williams and Katie Holmes from Dawson’s Creek are not pretty enough to play legends like Marilyn and Jackie. They are cute.
    Cute was fine for Dawson’s Creek.

  • Julia

    @James Kragen: I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH COMMENT #3!! Tom Cruise is a weirdo creep and Katie is too weak and submissive for such a psycho like him. She really does need to find a young man her own age.

  • irene

    oh, please, Louis Vuitton on her? she actually messed out this Louis Viton!
    it was longer, with a nice hemline, and she shortened it to this hideous lookk, and now the hem is falling, it’s coming UNDONE where she has her hand. Look closely. She is a mess. Only her face looks nicer, the rest is UGH.

  • lower back pain relief

    That dress looks like an old tacky sofa

  • Florarie

    She’s beautiful and she’s a good actress too.