Top Stories

Prince William & Kate Middleton: Royal Engagement Pictures!

Prince William & Kate Middleton: Royal Engagement Pictures!

Prince William and Kate Middleton look very much in love as they pose for photos in the Cornwall House of St. James’ Palace on Thursday (November 25) in London, England.

Prince William and Kate, both 28, had their official engagement portraits taken by celebrity photographer Mario Testino.

The two announced their engagement last month and will marry in the spring or summer of next year. After their wedding, William will continue his service in the Royal Air Force!

Like Just Jared on Facebook
prince william kate middleton engagement pictures 01
prince william kate middleton engagement pictures 02

Credit: Mario Testino; Photos: Getty
Posted to: Kate Middleton, Prince William

JJ Links Around The Web

Getty
  • Adam Goldberg expecting baby with girlfriend Roxanne Daner- US Weekly
  • Chris Brown and Karrueche Tran flipped their relationship back to on- TMZ
  • The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies set to win post-Christmas box office- Gossip Cop
  • R5 celebrates the holidays with hockey and snow- Just Jared Jr
  • 40 most shocking moments of television in 2014- Entertainment Weekly
  • Hollywood's most influential costume designer vies for another Oscar nod- Huffington Post
  • The Entourage movie is just around the corner- Lainey Gossip
  • Could Nightcrawler be the Crash of this season?- The Hollywood Reporter

65 Responses to “Prince William & Kate Middleton: Royal Engagement Pictures!”

Pages: « 1 2 [3] Show All

  1. 51
    eva Says:

    Chill out guys, at least we get a day off work on the 29 April :)

  2. 52
    no name Says:

    Sorry to be a kiljoy… but OMG if you guys saw a real pic of her like this one, then you would know how photoshoped these pictures really are!

    http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a296/karmie03/Media%20Wh%20res/1616.jpg

    or this one:

    http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a296/karmie03/Media%20Wh%20res/article-0-01C610AA00000578-262_468x.jpg

    Plus if any of you have followed their relationship over the last 8 years (at least minimally) you’ll know what social climbers Kate and her family really are. Of course she is happy, she’s slept her way to getting that ring, she might as well be happy.

    It is interesting that there are no pictures of Kate with any of the senior royals though. Although it’s not like any of them knew about their engagement until 2 and a half hours before it was made public (and William should have asked Her Majesy The Queen’s permision, not ust TELL her about it the moring before the engagement). These two are selfish twits!!!!

  3. 53
    wackybutnice Says:

    Looks like he is losing his hair fast!!!

  4. 54
    BB Says:

    @Deadpool:
    You must be kidding….these two care about the students?
    No way. How about Grandma caring about the students?
    Not a chance. This family is on its last leg of their royal B.S. and they know it. The people of the UK are fed up paying too many taxes for them to live in luxury. I hope they end it once and for all.
    It’s ridiculous and has been for centuries.

  5. 55
    mary Says:

    Listen to mayday parade@ 12/12/2010

    sorry to upset your day but these are the photographs chosen by both Catherine, as she wants to be called, and William. the fact that you don’t consider them to be “engagement” like is of no importance to either one of these two people.

  6. 56
    mary Says:

    Deadpool@ 12/12/2010 at 9:23 am

    if you had been paying attention to what’s going on you would know that people in Britain are looking forward to this wedding. they want to be as grand, as lavish, and as large as the one Diana and Charles had. they’re even demanding that Catherine’s train be as long as the one Diana had. April 29, 2011 will be a holiday over there and hotel rooms are filling up fast the the days surrounding the wedding. everyone wants to get a good spot to see the wedding. as for the students in Britain, you really don’t want to go there; i pay taxes there. and i can promise you that as a tax payer in Britain i support the British government every step of the way.

  7. 57
    lylian Says:

    LOL!! At the people who want to remove Queen E and her family.
    .
    I’m no monarchist by the way. I’m an Australia and my fellow Aussies had to vote a few years ago whether to keep the monarchy or not. Personally, I would like to see the monarchy abolish in Australia.
    .
    The problem is, if we don’t have a monarchy, are we going to go for a French Style Presidency or American Style Presidency or do we turn the Australian Governor General/representative of the Queen into some sort of appointed head of state with some reserve powers?
    .
    Each of these “presidential” styles of government and heirachy involve their own headaches. in france the president and the prime minister go head to head – from different parties, hating each other. In America – well, I don’t want an american system with its vote buying – yes, that’s what it is when the corporations and individuals can give huge amounts of money to fund advertising – including false advertising as the Swift Boat incident reveals. In Australia the political party which happens to be in power may appoint someone who owes that political party, Then try and influence matters when the opposition is in power – John Kerr and the 1975 constitutional crisis anyone?
    .
    Interestingly enough, a constitutional monarchy has proven to be the most stable political form. Denmark, Spain, Norway, Sweden, UK, Thailand, Japan, Belgium, Luxembourg, Monaco, Malaysia, Bhutan – so long as the kings and queens understand the role of a constitutional monarch and do not try to undermine it – like the Nepalese king did. BTW, in case some people are confused, Saudi Arabia, and other middle eastern kingdoms do not have a constitutional monarchy, just a monarchy.
    .
    So, before you wish for a change, think hard about what you are going to put in place. No system is perfect. It’s about which system might actually better. Personally, I’m not sure but it would be interesting for a real debate rather than off the cuff – arrrgh, off with their heads!
    .
    LOL!

  8. 58
    princessfake Says:

    I bet she can’t wait to drag him down that aisle; you can see the dollar signs already in her eyes…she’s nothing but a money grubbing royal wannabe

  9. 59
    Danielle Says:

    @Listen to mayday parade:
    I’m sure that is exactly what they wanted!!!

  10. 60
    Mia Says:

    @Deadpool:

    Then how much money do you think will it make selling the footage and pictures to TV stations all over the world?! How, do you think, celebs are paying for their weddings??? Most of the money spend for this wedding will be covered by such things as selling broadcasting rights to TV stations and exclusive coverage etc and NOT by the people of the UK. Goddamit, if you’re not even from the UK nor have been living there, then why do you believe to have the right of commenting on such things???

  11. 61
    Teagirl Says:

    Before you all go and do away with the Royals, besides considering Lylians great point, also consider, how much do they contribute to the economy of Britian? Really how many people do they employ? How much tourisim do the create?

    A whole lot, so before you go and off with their heads consider that yes they do live in luxury, but they also have there own money from the lands they have owned for hundreds of years (which is what is paying for most of the wedding, only security is being paid by taxes). And that they contribute a very large amount to the British economy.

  12. 62
    Teagirl Says:

    Before you all go and do away with the Royals, besides considering Lylians great point, also consider, how much do they contribute to the economy of Britian? Really how many people do they employ? How much tourisim do the create?

    A whole lot, so before you go and off with their heads consider that yes they do live in luxury, but they also have there own money from the lands they have owned for hundreds of years (which is what is paying for most of the wedding, only security is being paid by taxes). And that they contribute a very large amount to the British economy.

  13. 63
    deadpool Says:

    @Teagirl: Britians history is not told nor seen nor is it determined by one family. If tehre ar eno royals people woudl still go to britian to see the saxons the celts the beowul tales and all the ancient history. IT CAN and would curvive and thrive without the royals. Every single country that wa sonce under british rule has proven that the PEOPLE can perservere and florish and posterity proves it. From George Washington to The French revolution, Indian, middle eastern, ROYALTY does not determine the fate of a country. Let alone it’s TOURISM.

    My god if youre going to have an excuse for them come up with somthing better than that. Tourism…really as if Britians only good for that.

  14. 64
    Teagirl Says:

    @deadpool: Well considering I didn’t say that they were the only reason that people go to England, but it was more of a reply to those who say they are compleatly useless and contribute nothing. You cannot deny that they do create tourism and employ a large number of people. Employing people is something that happens to do alot for an economy. And right now the Royals do that for Britian. Really how many people does Stonehenge employ? There are defintily people who will go to Britian to see the ancient history, but there are alot that go because of the Royals. That just happens to be fact, you may think they are crazy to go for that reason, but the fact is that they do. How many places that are great tourst attractions are maintained by the Monarchy?

    Can Britian survive with out that, of course, but is sure does help.

  15. 65
    Julia Says:

    Al the best for the upcoming royal couple!! Guess what on the 29th April, 2011 my husband and I will also be celebrating our 16th Wedding Anniversary.

Pages: « 1 2 [3] Show All

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here