Top Stories

Rachel Bilson: Sur La Table Twosome!

Rachel Bilson: Sur La Table Twosome!

Rachel Bilson shops for Christmas presents with a pal at Sur La Table on Tuesday (December 14) in Glendale, Calif.

The 29-year-old actress has been busy over the past few days getting all of her holiday shopping done!

On Monday (December 13), Rachel hit up a Target store in Los Angeles and the day before she took her younger sister Hattie to pick up some wrapping paper at a Walgreens.

10+ pictures inside of Rachel Bilson shopping with a friend…

Like Just Jared on Facebook
rachel bilson sur la table twosome 01
rachel bilson sur la table twosome 02
rachel bilson sur la table twosome 03
rachel bilson sur la table twosome 04
rachel bilson sur la table twosome 05
rachel bilson sur la table twosome 06
rachel bilson sur la table twosome 07
rachel bilson sur la table twosome 08
rachel bilson sur la table twosome 09
rachel bilson sur la table twosome 10

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Read a recap for the latest episode of The Bachelor- US Weekly
  • Who is Lil Wayne taking when he leaves his record label?- TMZ
  • Porn star Mia Khalifa says Drake sent her Instagram messages- Gossip Cop
  • Ryan Beatty covers TLC's hit song 'Waterfalls' - Just Jared Jr
  • Chelsea Clinton shows off her post-baby body- Radar
  • Jane Fonda gives her honest thoughts on gender biased film studios- Huffington Post
  • Read a review for Johnny Depp's film Mortdecai- Lainey Gossip
  • Molly Shannon talks about her worst acting audition- The Hollywood Reporter

52 Responses to “Rachel Bilson: Sur La Table Twosome!”

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All

  1. 1
    joyce Says:

    fix your hair girl

  2. 2
    JC Says:

    Work just gets in the way of shopping.

  3. 3
    Nora Says:

    She’s getting so much milage for doing nothing in life that I’m officially going to name her Do-Nothing Girl. It’s official, The Do-Nothing Girl.

  4. 4
    johnny rockets Says:

    Where is Hayden, why did they announce they were going out?

  5. 5
    homeless rachel Says:

    i had alot of shtttt to say about her but it got deleted :(

  6. 6
    @#5 Says:

    Probably going to be so we can’t criticize her for being a useless waste of space.

    And @4, because it got her some more PR mileage, that’s all. Pressing out that illusion is all she’s got, while he has yet another movie in the pipeline, not to mention his charity work. If he spent any time with her at all while he was in LA it was probably just a low class booty call.

  7. 7
    Brightside Says:

    She has actually done a few weeks work this year when she was cast for a bit part in BBF & Baby! But I agree, one small part in a low budget film does not a career make. Neither does all her pretending to be someone seen as fashion relevant qualify as work. She spends far too much time pretending to be something and hardly any time working to actually be something. That’s life on the d-list for you…random, meanlingless and as boring as sh*t! Poor Rachel! I’m naming her as officially the most boring d-list actress in the world, ever. I can’t think of anyone more tedious than her, off-hand though Isabel Lucas is coming very close.

  8. 8
    je t'aime Says:

    Rachel!!!!!! Love you girl!

  9. 9
    Amalie Says:

    Love her style! Keep posting about Rachel, JJ :)

  10. 10
    Nadia Says:

    I’m laughing at the fact that there are only 8 comments right now. Just think, that if the people who didn’t like her or the people who think she’s a waste of space hadn’t written anything, there would only be two comments. This was first put up like 4 hours ago. I came back expecting there to be a lot more posts, lol. But 8? Wow.

  11. 11
    Tiffani Says:

    There were actually 9 comments when you posted. But I get what you’re saying, lol.

  12. 12
    MissAnthropica Says:

    @Nadia: LOL Well your kinda right actually.

    Another day another boring post about Rachel doing what?
    I wonder if JJ is trying to drive people away from the site honestly sometimes with posts like these.
    More A listers and B listers hell even C listers just not whatever the hell “this” is .
    Please. ITs boring more than anything else.

  13. 13
    MissAnthropica Says:

    Damnit the rest of my comment got cutt off .
    Well I was going to say what the hell happened to the girls HAIR.
    Looks like a tornado got ahold of it as she went shopping.

    Well now there will be 13 comments so that I guess is an upside for little miss look at me all the time lol

  14. 14
    @4 Says:

    @johnny rockets: @4 “johnny rockets” They never announced they are going out again. That was a unconfirmed story from People magazine that their only source was a made up ” friend” that later wouldnt comment when asked if what they had said was true to begin with even. Rachel work for Instyle which is a sister magazine to People magazine and weve all seen how Rachel uses FAMILY CONNECTIONS. The story is People was totally written up to give Rachel to most ammount of attention as she wrapped on that stupid dud film BFF and Baby thats all.
    People even changed the original story and quotes to make the rumor look more real. In the original quote from the “friend” source they said “they were dating again you could say” and when asked to explain what they meant they said that ” lets put it this way when Jae Gyllenhaal is on ice cream dates with Taylor Swift then yeah they are dating again and theyll get married too lol” The quote sounded like total bull and that the source was being totally sarcastic about Rachel and Hayden.
    Later when they tryed to asked the friend if any of it was true they wouldnt comment.

    That part was removed from the People story later on completely because the source most likely wasnt suppose to say that and People wasnt suppose to quote that part .
    My guess is an idiotic assisstant of a idiotic publicist made the mistake or maybe even one of Rachel’s friends herself messed up with the story or maybe even Rachel you never know talking about Jake G and Taylor S ‘s hook up as to why your starting a rumor your back with someone and being dumb enough to admit it sounds like something only Rachel would be dumb enough to say . Lets be honest.
    Now Hayden has vanished after he got a little press from it and Rachel of course having nothing better in her entire LIFE is dragging out any attention she can get from a UNCONFIRMED rumor in a magazine that kisses her butt (PEOPLE) and that she works for more or less.

    Think of it this way its kind of like People Magazine naming Ryan Renolds sexiest man alive and then just a couple weeks later getting the exclusive scoop he and Scarlett are splitting up.
    Those things dont just happen you know. It was arranged.

    So thats the way it works with alot of d listers-z listers even and People and other tabloids.

    The only difference is the public actually knows who Ryan and Scarlett are lol and care and they arent z listers like Rachel.
    But hey someone has to be a z lister right? Otherwise how would you know what an A lister looks like? lol

  15. 15
    lexy hates bilson Says:

    Notice how she’s back to being on JJ full-time since her “getting back with Hayden” – as I’ve been saying all along – guess we know who pays JJ’s bill!!!
    JJ why is this girl constantly shopping for CHRISTmas presents?? I was under the impression that the BIRTH OF CHRIST wasn’t really supported by Jewish people!! Rachel is Jewish. Hanukkah is over. Just say she’s out spending Hayden’s Star Wars money!!!

  16. 16
    MissAnthropica Says:

    @lexy hates bilson:
    Well Im an “atheist” and I celebrate “Christmas” in a non religious way of course but I do. So I guess really anyone could celebrate it with the whole tree and decoration bit without the CHRIST part.
    That and you dont honestly expect Rachel to miss out on an opportunity to be out and have her picture taken everyday like only a major holiday provides for?
    Nope . lol
    I doubt anyone but Rachel and Daddy are paying for these pictures and posts. When she wasnt ” with” Hayden she was on here just as much if not even more so that doesnt seem to stop her,

  17. 17
    MissAnthropica Says:

    She doesnt actually have to pay the paps to get them to show up she just offers them a petty cash exclusive photo op to only one photographer to only one agency and then they take the gig get a few hundred dollars at most for it and those picture are resold to ppl dumb enough to buy them like these sites..

  18. 18
    MissAnthropica Says:

    There are alot of papparazzi in LA and more so everyday they cant all go after to REAL celebrities to many guys to elbow out of the way for the same shot.
    So about over half of the paps are low end they take only cash quick gigs like this that are arranged with Dlisters looking for attention, Like Rachel herself or Micheal Lohan you get the idea.
    BTW @lexy hates bilson: Lexy how do you know Rachel is jewish Ive never heard her say she was or anything I was just wondering is all.
    Of course she might be only playing jewish to get ahead in the industry lol like no one hasnt done that before just saying.

  19. 19
    MissAnthropica Says:

    How lame is that I had to break up my comment just so it made it up. Otherwise it was being “not posted” but not denied either.
    And as you can see there wasnt any cursing in it or anything bad. I just had to change to “wording” of it so it didnt get stopped.

  20. 20
    Targetz Says:

    Thought JJ said Rachel went to this event after the Video Games Awards….. guess not.
    She just went to SHOP at Target the next day close but not quite.

    I guess Target is the new hip place where all the cool pressho kids hang out. LOLZ

  21. 21
    fandango Says:


    Too answer your question on the Jewish thing I believe it’s in her BIO she is part Jewish, Filipino and Italian. She is Jewish on her father’s side I think. Doesn’t mean she celebrates it some who have the heritage might not follow it. In her case she possible has both Christian and Jewish so maybe they celebrate both. Who knows it’s a mute point on who follows what at this time of year. It’s about what you desire to follow or celebrate.

    Your right on about how the story got attention the thing that sealed the idea they were dating again other then this small video of them in Oct shopping, was the fact he is coming out of her house and driving her car “AGAIN”. The both are on repeat they repeat same events, chores etc as if this is all the paparazzi can get out of them walking to an from a store or shop, restaurant or her home. My guess is if they remain in the same repeat mode as last year we will see them taking gifts to her friends or family next week or weekend. Maybe see them leave LAX together unless his so called buddy who made the People Mag comment claims yeah they talk but wouldn’t call it dating. Maybe he co-owns the car with her (as she got it when they were still engaged) and he wanted visitation to reason he drives it. along with the fact that this too seems staged. Seems like you get one pap who takes the pic and a few websites buy it doesn’t seem many do in their case. If RB made money off of who circulates the picture she would be poor as JJ might be one of maybe 2 I know who care enough to post on her the rest of the reports are either twitter or rumor magazine articles Now JJ is the only one who gets a ton of comments the others get 10 or less hits.

  22. 22
    @21 Says:

    @fandango: That video of them shopping that was never released looked extremely forced cold and staged. You cant say its because the papparazzi were there are thats why they looked grumpy because your suppose to believe in the video they didnt know anyone was there filming them while they loaded groceries. So they shouldnt of looked that pissed to be around eachother again both had a here we go again look to them. Talk about bad acting.
    I think that video was suppose to be staged and sold as an exclusive but then it never got used or no one wanted to buy it and instead they went with the pictures of him leaving her house but no pictures of her in sight that day to start the back together rumor. Maybe Hayden’s people stopped the video from being released all over because they didnt think the whole back with Rachel thing was good for his image.
    It wasnt posted untill Dec on Youtube which is very very strange.
    Also some thought it was an old video from the beginning of this year Feb/March and not from Oct of this year. Back when they were still together and they just reused old video to try and stir some rumors back up.
    Seems Rachel’s ex fake boyfriend changed his mind is what it looks like though after the 24th he disappeared and hasnt been seen near her since. Thats why the video wasnt put on YouTube untill after he disappeared I guess her people decided to use to shopping video anyways with or without his help.
    Far as anyone knows Hayden paid for the lease on her car back when they were still together so it might be partly his. Because she had to have almost flat broke by then hence why she swamped out a Lexus with higher insurance for a simple Prius instead. Both hybrids but the Prius is cheaper to maintain than a Lexus is.
    If they did get back together I think they are already done again they got the attention their people were hoping to get for them that week and its finished. Christensen’s people most likely got cold feet and backed off from the rumor leaving Rachel hanging but still milking it all for all she can of course.

  23. 23
    correction Says:

    @ fandango #21 & #14

    There were two friends that made the comment about them dating, or seeing each other again, whatever you want to call it. Rachel’s friend stated to People magazing that “they’re dating again”, that was it. It was a friend of Hayden’s that told Ted Casablanca what you are saying about them seeing each other again. Hayden’s friend said “yeah they still talk, they still see each other, ” and the rest of the stuff you said. That was on Eonline in Ted Casablanca’s column. So there were two friends, one of both, that talked, but it was Hayden’s friend that clammed up when pushed to talk more. Dating again, seeing each other, pretty much the same thing. But the video of them together is the photo proof people were claiming did not exist, plus him driving her car. They were seen out to dinner together in another column in People and Ted’s columns the week of Thanksgiving, then disappeared for two weeks. You are probably right about them showing up at some point again this Christmas

  24. 24
    What a Loser Says:

    OMG she’s out shopping. Again. She doesn’t work she just shops and calls the papparazzi to take pictures of her shopping. Un-effing-believable that this could go on for over 3 years. She’s made about that many low budget quickies where the worked a few days to a week and only one has been released post the awful, awful Jumper. The reason why we still see such a pressb**ch constantly on the gossips is 1) Hollywood nepotism at its most disgusting and 2) she pays for it one way or another. With as many connections as she has, if she had the slightest degree of talent, she’d be working in something. But she doesn’t just a monstrous ego that thinks she deserves to work as an actress and if she just advertises enough she will one day get jobs and respect. Well that’s not how it works. I could also point out that she looks just awful in those pictures. The hair is dreadful and super tight jeans and a tight top just shows what a little dumpy body she has short short legs, a long torso and no boobs to speak of. She isn’t dressing the body she has instead she’s dressing the body she wants to have (tall, thin and long sexy legs.) The only way she gets that is through camera lens tricks and airbrushing. What an absolute delusional loser. So deserves Hayden Christensen.

  25. 25
    When R U Marrying Her, H? Says:

    She’s clearly desperate to get on Real Housewives tv show but she can’t until she gets married. Come on Hayden quit milking that under sized cow and own the thing. It might be cheaper over time than paying for her to shop and hire photographers every single day. She’ll want a huge wedding and a custom gown but she will also sell the rights to video and pictorials to People or Hello! and that may pay for it itself. You know I didn’t think one could have skinny legs with absolutely no muscle tone and still have the appearance of saddlebags and general lack of shape but she does. She’s almost 30 and pretty soon those saddlebags will get worse and stick out more plus the butt sag down and it won’t matter how much she pukes up everything she eats. She’s going to look like complete shayt unless she starts working out and getting some tone. But she clearly doesn’t listen to anyone. Look how awful she dresses. She used to be cute in the OC days but ever since Jumper and her dating then engaged to Hayden Christensen she let herself go. She figures she doesn’t have to try to look good anymore because between husband and father they will subsidize her shopping and pay for papparazzi the rest of her life.

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here