Top Stories

Nicole Kidman & Keith Urban Welcome New Baby Girl

Nicole Kidman & Keith Urban Welcome New Baby Girl

Keith Urban and his wife Nicole Kidman have a new addition to their family!

Nicole, 43, and Keith, 43, had a new baby girl on December 28, 2010 named Faith Margaret Kidman Urban thanks to a surrogate.

“Our family is truly blessed, and just so thankful, to have been given the gift of baby Faith Margaret,” the couple said in a statement. “No words can adequately convey the incredible gratitude that we feel for everyone who was so supportive throughout this process, in particular our gestational carrier.”

Nicole and Keith are already proud parents of their 2-year-old daughter, Sunday-Rose, and this will be their second biological child together.

Congrats to the happy couple!!!

Like Just Jared on Facebook

JJ Links Around The Web

Getty

152 Responses to “Nicole Kidman & Keith Urban Welcome New Baby Girl”

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 » Show All

  1. 1
    Eresyn Says:

    WOW!!!! this was a surprise!!!! Congrats!!!

  2. 2
    Sligo ^_^ cute Says:

    Congrats

  3. 3
    Iffy Miffy Says:

    “our gestational carrier” … ?! What horrible wording.

  4. 4
    lillyb Says:

    That is awesome. Good for them.

  5. 5
    *~*+*~* Says:

    Congrats to the happy couple!!!

  6. 6
    Shawn Says:

    How wonderful!

  7. 7
    Just lurking Says:

    Kidman didn’t want to get pregnant?
    she couldn’t get pregnant?
    He was shooting blanks??
    Whats the reason for the surrogate?

  8. 8
    sarah Says:

    @Iffy Miffy: maybeee, but i don’t thinkyou’re allowed to name them sooo. =\

  9. 9
    LaTanya Says:

    Awww congrats…little Sunday is a big sister now!

  10. 10
    Iffy Miffy Says:

    @sarah: True but they could have said the woman who carried her to term or something like that. This is horribly cold and very dehumanizing. Gestational carrier – horrible!

  11. 11
    7TH Avenue Says:

    I agree – bad wording on the “gestational carrier”. So this time they announce a surrogate? Too bad she doesn’t spend time with her other kids with Tom.

  12. 12
    boston61 Says:

    Nicole is disgusting. Have your own damn baby. She really thinks she is better than the rest of us. Go back to Australia.

  13. 13
    Kay simply amazing !!!!!!! Says:

    Gongaratuliton nicole and keith *w*

  14. 14
    .... Says:

    I am glad they were honest about this one. I always thought she used a surrogate for the first kid and pretended to be pregnant.

  15. 15
    Sligo ^_^ cute Says:

    New baby :-D

  16. 16
    rhonda Says:

    why get fat and have stretch marks when you can hire someone to do it for you. Girls, we gotta a new job for ya!

  17. 17
    Juliet Says:

    @boston61:

    Nicole is almost 44. It may be she couldn’t have gotten pregnant. The surrogate used her egg and Keith’s tadpoles. We don’t know the story. But I think this is great news for her and Keith.

    Such hatred for a woman you don’t know.

  18. 18
    sandy Says:

    @….:
    Ditto

  19. 19
    LJ Says:

    For those wondering (and hating). I read on another site that Nicole is diabetic and it is unwise for diabetics to have more than one child naturally. So that might explain why they used a surrogate mother for this child.

    Congrats to the happy couple. Can’t wait to see pics.

  20. 20
    Missy Says:

    The poor haters missed this by 10,000 miles. Haaaaaaaaaa.

    You know the ones who know everything personal , thru insider informatin!! HAAAAAAAAA

    Blind sided!

    Good on ya Urban family!

  21. 21
    dani Says:

    Congrats Nicole and Keith. Wonderful news for you!

  22. 22
    Laura Says:

    @boston61: wtf? are you 5 ?

  23. 23
    Courtney Says:

    Um Nicole recently said in an interview that Sunday was a Miracle due to her previous history and age. so using a surrogate was what they had to do to have another biological Child leave them alone.

  24. 24
    bf Says:

    Pretty much proves she faked the first one.

  25. 25
    B Says:

    They use the term gestational carrier to be clear that the child is biologically theirs, which is not true in all surrogate situations. Some surrogates also provide the egg. Given her past troubles getting pregnant and miscarrying, coupled with her age I think it’s safe to say using a surrogate wasn’t a matter of convenience but necessity.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 » Show All

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here