Top Stories

Kate Hudson: Baby Bump in Malibu!

Kate Hudson: Baby Bump in Malibu!

Kate Hudson pulls on a Square Cardigan by TEXTILE Elizabeth and James as she spends the afternoon at a park on Saturday (March 5) in Malibu, Calif.

The 31-year-old actress showed off her growing baby bump in a tight white tank.

Kate is expecting a baby with her rocker beau, Matt Bellamy, later this year and her family says they’re hoping for a baby girl!

FYI: Kate is already the mama to a 7-year-old son, Ryder, from a previous marriage.

Like Just Jared on Facebook
kate hudson baby bump malibu 01
kate hudson baby bump malibu 02
kate hudson baby bump malibu 03
kate hudson baby bump malibu 04
kate hudson baby bump malibu 05

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Ryan Adams performed a ballad after his split from Mandy Moore- US Weekly
  • Richard Simmons got a visit from cops, who say he is fine- TMZ
  • Watch Blake Shelton perform “Boys ’Round Here” on SNL- Gossip Cop
  • See cute videos of R5 at Sundance Film Festival- Just Jared Jr
  • Gia Giudice made a tribute video for her mom Teresa- Radar
  • What should you know about Sundance Film Festival?- Huffington Post
  • Read a review of The Boy Next Door- Lainey Gossip
  • Who just got cast in Quentin Tarantino's Hateful Eight?- The Hollywood Reporter

38 Responses to “Kate Hudson: Baby Bump in Malibu!”

Pages: « 1 [2] Show All

  1. 26
    Marisa Says:

    I think Matt people contracted her to be his fake gf and Kate decided to get knock up from this. I like Kate but really you would think these stars can’t afford doctors or birth control. I believe Kate did this on purpose.

  2. 27
    waffle bowl Says:

    @XoXo: Sorry, but I consider raising another human being to be a much, much, bigger and more important commitment than getting married. You can be forgiven for ******** up a marriage, but not for ******** up a kid. Marriage is just a legal contract, there’s nothing that requires that you mean to keep any of the promises that you make when you take those vows. Lots of people get married for all the wrong reasons, it’s silly to assume that marriage automatically makes a person committed to their significant. I mean, wasn’t Kate married before? Look how well that turned out. Now compare that to her mom and stepdad, who’ve been together for years and years, yet aren’t married. Commitment is in the heart, not in a piece of paper. Besides, this relationship will most likely fall apart for reasons that have nothing to do with whether or not they get married. In fact, its probably best that they don’t marry.

  3. 28
    snowcat Says:

    @Frida: I agree with you,I see nothing trashy about Kate’s situation.

  4. 29
    open-minded realist Says:

    Are you people for real? What century are you from? Tomorrow is International Women’s Day and clearly you people are still living in the dark ages with your judgement of what a woman can do with her own life. She has a supportive family (from what I can see) and the financial resources to care for herself and a child. It would appear that the father will be a part of her baby’s life, just as her first son’s is – where the heck do you people get your license to judge from? Just because you see pics of her dating men? Are you kidding me? There are women being persecuted all around the world simply for being women, and you bullies are concerned because an actress is having a baby without being married? Get a life and stop judging other people.

  5. 30
    waffle bowl Says:

    Significant other, sorry.

  6. 31
    Kristen from MA Says:

    I would think that God would be too busy to comment on a gossip blog, what with all the turmoil going on in the world.

    Or maybe it’s just some petty little human trying to ascribe his/her own prejudices onto a higher power to, you know, justify them.

    (FWIW, I don’t like Kate Hudson – she has zero talent IMO – but calling yourself ‘God’ to ****-shame is just NOT cool.)

  7. 32
    kindness Says:

    @God: Who died and made you Pope?

  8. 33
    pk1010 Says:

    @Frida: @Frida:

    If you have to ask what is wrong with that, there is no explaning to be done for you…or to you. What about husbands, not babydaddys who are here today and gone…soon.

  9. 34
    Solv Says:

    Uhhh…starlet??? Hardly!!!

  10. 35
    Frida Says:

    Well you know what? Not having a marriage licence doesn’t mean that the baby won’t be loved. Not having a marriage licence doesn’t mean that THEY don’t love each other. And – in this day and age with people breaking up all over the place – a marriage licence won’t stop them from splitting up if they want to. Kate has already been married once and clearly that didn’t work out, maybe she doesn’t want to rush into it again? That doesn’t mean that she should give up on being a mother again if that’s what she wants. And if it was an accident then they are clearly making the best of the situation. I’m just saying it’s really wrong to sit behind a computer and judge someone that you don’t even know.

  11. 36
    boo Says:

    Heat of the moment. I bet she’s miserable right about now. When is the last time you saw her with the baby daddy?

  12. 37
    ah well Says:

    what’s sad is she’s a mediocre actress with horrible movies and is only famous for who her mother is and now because she’s pregnant.

  13. 38
    Svetik musetik Says:

    Ребенок это всегда счастье, и не важно в браке родился или нет. Matt не отказывается от ребенка и ее не бросает

Pages: « 1 [2] Show All

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here