Top Stories

Daniel Craig & Rachel Weisz: Mayfair Mates!

Daniel Craig & Rachel Weisz: Mayfair Mates!

Daniel Craig and Rachel Weisz leave the Louis Vuitton store together on Thursday (March 24) in Mayfair, England.

The 41-year-old actress is in town shooting her next movie 360 alongside Jude Law. The day before, Rachel and Jude shared a laugh together on set in between takes.

Last week, Daniel celebrated St. Patrick’s Day in New York City by visiting with Archbishop Timothy Dolan at St. Patrick’s Cathedral. Later in the day, he watched the annual parade.

Just Jared on Facebook
daniel craig rachel weisz mayfair mates 01
daniel craig rachel weisz mayfair mates 02
daniel craig rachel weisz mayfair mates 03
daniel craig rachel weisz mayfair mates 04

Credit: Tony Clark / Charlie Purvey; Photos: Splashnewsonline
Posted to: Daniel Craig, Rachel Weisz

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Kendall Jenner catches man wearing "Kill the Kardashians" shirt - TMZ
  • Madison Pettis is opening up about her new show - Just Jared Jr
  • Celebs are slamming Ivanka Trump again - TooFab
  • Patrick Dempsey is working on a clothing collection - The Hollywood Reporter
  • One of James Franco's former co-stars reveal if he was a good kisser - Just Jared Jr
  • 100

    somebody had to do it.

  • guinness

    “somebody had to do it”
    yes–and i am glad it was stopped at 100! for now anyway-thx

    interesting article Mendel…and why would they print that in a newspaper? it may help to incite anger and a bad rally rather than warn people –the article was annoying me. So i hope no one gets hurt….and does Dan do demonstrations? I havent heard of him attending any–just dressing drag for one!!! Let me know if you go, I will do a round of Guinness instead of a pizza for you!! Unions are forgotten….our govt. needs to be reminded of the past and how the ecomomy was built after the WWars. dah–this was an incredible show of suupport, but alas, Tories are everywhere….

  • Bond23 will start in November


    DAME Judi Dench has proved to be a not-so-secret agent by revealing that filming for the next James Bond blockbuster will start in November.

    The date had been kept top secret until the Oscar-winning actress, 76, who will reprise the role of spymaster M for the ­seventh time, let it slip.

    For the film, which has the working title of Bond 23, Daniel Craig will return as 007, while Ralph Fiennes and Javier Bardem are in talks about appearing as villains.

    The future of the Bond franchise, which was revamped with the casting of Craig as Bond in Casino Royale and Quantum of ­Solace, was in doubt last year when MGM Studios filed for bankruptcy protection.

    However, fears were allayed in January when it was announced that Sam Mendes would direct Bond 23, which is due for release in November 9, 2012. Dame Judi revealed the start date for filming during a visit last week to Hever Castle in Kent, to plant a rose bred for its gardens.

    She said: “I am going to do the next Bond in November. I don’t know the location yet but hopefully it will be somewhere nice. I can’t tell you much more but I do enjoy ­playing M as she is such a strong character. I like being bossy and my grandson thinks its cool that I’m in Bond.”

  • Bond23 will start in November
  • to buy Gillette for Rachel

    @ 03/26/2011 at 3:30

    don’t be a fool. it’s not what ever she bought at Louis Vuitton that made her so happy. open your eyes; it’s the man she’s with.

  • Questions of a fan

    @Sats: I bet so to…. TO SATS: and that’s probably the reason for why the he has yet to confirm. But then again why when the whole world knows that he and rachel obviously cheated….it doesn’t matter I guess these mindless fools would take a man with less integrity and honesty than both Barney and The Teletubbies combined!. Lol…by the way Fran don’t let thes mindless PLASTIC idiots twist the truth…those pictures of Darren were taken in Nov/ Dec of last year you know after rachel and him broke up…can you really blame the guy for at least trying to move on? I mean not too long after that was Rachel spotted playing hunky dory with this spineless worm, whom was reportedly the reason for their intial split…think about why was it his name dropped and not one of Aronofsky’s “so-called” “secret” girlfriends. These people here obviously don’t want to believe that Daniel could have possibly broke up a family and his engagement at the same time…BE REAL…and by the way to the PLASTICS, I see you have all been pathetically been waiting for this comment. So than tell me…when I said that I like Rachel and Jude together(they look a lot better together and have extremely great chemistry, which is less than I can say with daniel, they’d really complement each other) how is that any different than you being okay with her and monkey looking Daniel Craig after she left DA to be with him. I mean.if Rachel left Daniel for Jude law, you tell me wouldn’t that be wrong? How about if she carried an affair with jude secretly? ( not saying she is but still) Would cheating on Daniel be wrong, would leaving him for another man be right? How about if it were vice versa? Is cheating wrong? Not adultery, Cheating? (And according to one of you to commit adultery you have to be married, what about cheating?) If it would be wrong for her to do that to Daniel or Daniel to do that to her, than it is certifiabley wrong for that to happen to both DA and Ms.Satsuki Mitchell….

  • to questions of a fan/Aiden

    oh blah! blah! give it a rest. what the hell is wrong with you. are you mentally challenged?? why do you keep insisting on bringing up Darren the timei. Darren is only part of Rachel’s life now in so far as he is the father of her son and they share custody. she has chosen, of her own free will, to be with Daniel.

    Satsuki is no longer part of Daniel’s life; so why the hell do you keep bringing her up. so what is he was once engaged to the girl. he obviously changed his mind and ended the relationship. big deal!! people break engagements all the time. Daniel now wants to be with Rachel. so once again, what is your problem???

  • to 107

    Satsuki is no longer part of Daniel’s life; so why the hell do you keep bringing her up.
    QoF sympathizes with Satsuki because Qos’s partner always dumped her. No wonder her partner constantly has dumped her. Because Qos is such a jerk.

  • to 107

    Satsuki is no longer part of Daniel’s life; so why the hell do you keep bringing her up.
    QoF sympathizes with Satsuki because QoF’s partner always dumped her. No wonder her partner constantly has dumped her. Because QoF is such a jerk/gross.

  • Questions of a fan

    @to questions of a fan/Aiden: hey Buddy…still haven’t answered my Question….it must be quite the mental challenge for you my friend. Your failure to answer my question based on my observations tells me that you either don’t know how to answer that or your fighting with your own conviction. You know it was wrong what these two did and deep down you know that whether this last until the filming of bond 23 or next year that it will soon and eventually end. A relationship created and based on lust and the manipulation and pain of others can not and will not stand. So yes cheating is wrong, just admit that’s what these two did and others were hurt in the process and I’m almost very sure your concise will be eased. That’s why you can’t answer the question cause you know what I say is true! And you CAN’T HANDLE THE TRUTH n you pathetic egotistical moron! For you liking a couple like this and bidding all your adoration to them is sickneing and it surely tells me where your morals lie. God I’d hate to be in a relationship with you man! But than again your PLASTIC…you have no feelings right?And my problem is that people actually stand up for this BS and are okay with it. For example, Brad and Angie….that tells the younger generation that oh it’s okay to cheat, lie, manipulate the people you claim to love….it’s okay to hurt others as long as you feel happy, never mind the logistics of everything. That’s why all of you are so darn messed up…It’s okay as long as these two cheaters are happy right? For christ ‘s sake there is a child involved here, or have you all forgotten as you constantly drool on your feet talking about how amazing these two are together. Will when push comes to shove will see about how you feel when these two are over….watch, wait, and see. That’s all I’ll say…but go ahead conversate over it….that’s fine by me! While your at it question your morals…just what is right and wrong again?

  • to 107 110

    Thanks, The God of contrary to expectations.
    We will hear happy news of Dan/Rach soon.
    Oh, I forget to say..”Good night”, loser. LOL







  • to Questions of a fan

    Have you insisted on it on thread of Angie/Brad? Do you blame them majestically? I do not think so. You care only Rachel/Daniel.

  • chuj

    oh blah! blah! give it a rest. what the hell is wrong with you. are you mentally challenged??
    and YOU? Are you okay? Everything good with you? If you want I book one bed for you in the asylum called Bohnice.

  • mouse

    @Bond23 will start in November:
    what a saucy news….. a mouse who hovered was personally Judi!

  • Lodger

    You know, Louis Vuitton sells mens accessories too, so they both could have been shopping while there. Just saying as someone thinks Rachel was making Daniel buy her something. He may have, and she could buy him something too if she’d wanted. Whatever. Some of you are reading way more into this than what the reality is. And as far as Daniel being the one to split up Rachel and Darren, well, you really don’t know who went after who, do you. Daniel had been in an unhappy relationship for the last several years and felt stuck. Rachel was not happy, but she was not innocently seduced by no means. Basically they were two lonely people who happened to find each other and escape together. And as for Darren, having a child with someone is not an insignificant matter, and you really cannot just cast him aside in all of this. He’s not going away. He is half of her son and there is just no getting around that. As long as the three of them exist, Rachel, Darren and Henry, they will always be tied together in one way or another.

    The point is, don’t go marrying off Daniel to Rachel already. That’s all fantasy. If you like them together then enjoy it while it lasts, but don’t get all outraged when they eventually move on to other people. They are searching for real love like the rest of us. If you’re lucky enough to have already found it, then good for you. You are to be envied. If other people move on then realize that they haven’t been as lucky as you yet. All they want is their happiness.

  • to questions of a fan/Aiden

    yeah! you are definitely mentally challenged. thank you for proving it.

  • to lodger 117

    Nicely said, you speak the truth. I am happy for them and at least at this current time Daniel seems at ease with Rachel , at least someone who smiles and who he feels good with (it seems from the photos).

  • ! cappuccino !

    There are some real barfy sympathizers on here. I guess they are just so pi***ed off that Daniel left the barf for a real woman.
    It is Daniel’s right to be happy with anyone he wants and his right to be with the woman who makes him happy as post 117 says. No one can force him to be with that other one. Glad he finally woke up and smelled the cappuccino brewing.

  • This and Heaven Too

    .We all deserve love, I for one hope they have found love. Life is to short to be unhappy, grab happiness when you can. Nobody knows how long they have on this earth. Why waste time being miserable.
    TO QoF. maybe it is time for you let go of your anger , how can 2 people cause you to be so upset.

  • Amy

    to Lodger
    to This and Heaven Too
    Thank you.
    It keeps me sticking into my heart, so I will bear your words in mind.
    All gossip boards are ****. However, I am able to gain an insight into human nature sometimes. We know the truth, not only by the reason, but also by the heart.
    Good night, all :)

  • guinness

    I caught up on some realllly awesome series from netflx, and saw whimpy kid 2–HYSTERICAL. And you probly avoided gaol again–ya can’t run forever! but i have a feeling you had fun cuz otherwise you would report here with the rest of us not doing anything ‘cept hitting the web. (goood morning FIO!)

    And Dan getting an Oscar for playing a journalist following the main character? still a supporting role according to me, yet, the screen writers have yet to “speak”, si?

    He is gonna be everywhere soon… will he answer questions of the equality skit? I thought he invoked his daughter with the emotional face he conjured up…otherwise, how did he seem so empathetic? interesting. I want a “sit down” with him!

    ah, and then sit ON him? no, yes, yes, yes, no. but yes.

    night…a quiet one. ~M

  • Questions of a fan

    @to questions of a fan/Aiden:You still never anwered my QUESTION, NONE OF YOU HAVE…Is cheating wrong, why is it you all refuse to answer that? Huh? We’ll fake twisted piece of PLASTIC….oh and by the way Ikm very happy and satisfied in my life…I’m fulfilled. I have the right to express my opinion…it’s one of the reasons I came to this country. To be free of smothering idiots like you! Telling people what to think, how to think, what to say, how to say it! Now as I am entitled to my opinion, it is no one’s right to tell me that I can not or that I’m crazy. You are a bully…always picking on someone, all of you are! Just cause I don’t share your exact view on things? Hey someone’s got to put the reality check into you guys! If that’s me and I have to be blatantly persecuted by you guys than fine, I’ll deal with it…but if I have to you have to….These two cheated,everyone knows that, it won’t last, yes everyone deserves to be in love, to be happy, but my absolute gurantee is that these two won’t find it completely in one another. They will break up…because any relationship born out of cheating won’t be able to stand cause realistically, one of them will always be wondering is the other being faithfull…cause if they cheated to be each other, well….you get it…

  • Questions of a fan

    Oh don’t say it!!!! You know nothing question’s of a fan….you know nothing!!! I scoff at you. LOL…..ha,ha,ha,ha…..

  • Fio

    Daniel was trending last Sat again, he won three times in March. YAY×3!!! :)
    Maybe he starts shooting today or tomorrow in London…right?
    ClaudiaSLBDias: Walked by Daniel Craig. I think he was coming form the moveable loo the filming crew set up on a side street. Days of glamour are over.
    1 day ago via web
    Wow, awesome!!
    Jon_Favreau: Just saw the final cut of the new footage I’m bringing to @WonderCon. I’ll do a Q&A as well. #CowboysandAliens #sanfranciscohereicome
    2 days ago via Echofon
    WonderCon 2011
    to Bond23 will start in November
    Awwwww thanks Judi!! You have secret intelligence, openly without concealment. Her brilliant work testifies to her ability. lol
    to Lodger
    “You know, Louis Vuitton sells mens accessories too, so they both could have been shopping while there. Just saying as someone thinks Rachel was making Daniel buy her something. He may have, and she could buy him something too if she’d wanted.”
    Well,that’s exactly what I was thinking, and I’m pretty sure!!

  • Fio

    Sanningen om fjärde delen i Millennium
    (Google Translation)
    The truth about the fourth part of the Millennium
    The interest in a fourth Millenniumbok is huge overseas. While suggesting some of Stieg Larsson’s notes that he also planned to book five and six.
    Express can now tell you the details from the author’s success secret script.
    - Lisbeth Salander’s twin sister Camilla a more prominent role, says the author’s close friend Kurdo Baksi.
    Lisbeth Salander’s twin sister Camilla appears briefly in “The girl who played with fire” but have no contact with Lisbeth. Now, the sister of a greater role. The story takes place on Banks Island in Canada. The relationship between Salander and Mikael Blomqvist deepened.
    The unpublished manuscript containing a completed beginning and an end. The trilogy has sold 52 million copies Stieg Larsson died November 9, 2004 of a heart attack. His Millennium trilogy was released posthumously on Collins with a book a year, 2005, 2006 and 2007. So far, the books sold in 52 million copies (all sizes included, paperback, hardcover, audio book, etc.) and rights have been sold to 46 countries.
    The Swedish film version of Larson’s book “Men Who Hate Women” was awarded three gold beetles, including the category of “Best Picture”. It has also received the American Award “Critics’ Choice Awards” for best foreign film. The American version is currently being recorded with Daniel Craig and Mara Rooney in the lead roles.
    Revenues from Larsson’s books are collected in the company Moggliden AB operated by Joe and Erland Larsson. The first annual report has been submitted to the April 30, 2010 made a profit of 146 million.
    When Stieg Larsson died suddenly of a heart attack November 9, 2004, he had already signed a contract with Collins on the Millennium trilogy, which became a multimillion-dollar success. But he had not meant to stop there. A script for a second book was unfinished and notes from the crime writer suggests that he may have planned for a fifth and sixth book.
    - I want to emphasize that Stieg probably wrote more than a fourth script. He wrote probably a fifth and a sixth well. There is certainly how a lot of notes at any time, “says Daniel Poohl, chief editor of Expo, and friend of Stieg Larsson.
    - I have personally found the notes on napkins. But it is not easy to make a book of a napkin, “he says.
    “Almost ready” Written ”
    Opinion is divided on how many pre-written pages that are the secret fourth script. Larsson’s partner Eva Gabrielsson writes in the book “Millennium, Stieg and I” to the case of some 200 pages.
    - Stieg said to me before he died that it was almost finished. So it should move about much more than that, “said Stieg brother Joakim Larsson.
    The interest abroad is huge for a new book in the Millennium series. According to Collins, the trilogy has sold 52 million copies and been sold to 46 countries.
    - I am not aware of any publisher pressure because we have been clear from the beginning that there are only three books, “says Eva Gedin, publishing director at Collins, and Stieg Larsson’s publisher.
    - However, I very often get questions from journalists. Mostly from abroad.
    Great interest for a four
    On 21 December, the Hollywood film after Larsson’s books Swedish premiere.
    - The interest is huge. Not least for a fourth book, if any. When I meet people in the film industry, I always get questions about it and also by journalists when I get interviewed, “said Soren Staermose, producer of the Swedish Millennium Films and co-producer for the Hollywood version.
    According to Larsson’s Friend Kurdo Baksi we get the fourth book to learn more about Lisbeth Salander’s twin sister Camilla. She appears briefly in “The girl who played with fire” but have no contact with Lisbeth.
    - She may be a more prominent role.
    Baksi present himself in the books and says Stieg before his death, the plot of the secret script for him.
    - Lisbeth Salander also makes a trip to Greenland. But I’m not sure if this is the fourth book, it is perhaps the book five in the series, which is half finished. Stieg was working in a different order, “he says.
    As previously reported, Expressen, said Stieg Larsson in an email to his friend John-Henri Holmberg, the unpublished manuscript containing a completed beginning and an end. The e-mail also stated that much of the action takes place on Banks Island in Canada and the relationship between Salander and Mikael Blomqvist deepened.
    Working title: “God’s revenge”
    In Eva Gabrielsson’s own book has Stieg fourth script had the working title “God’s revenge”. She also touches on the document, albeit very briefly: “What I do want to say that Lisbeth Salander gradually frees himself from his demons and enemies. Every time she has taken revenge on someone who hurt her physically or mentally she is removing the tattoo that represented this particular evil, “she writes.
    The script for the fourth book, which was printed and inserted into a binder, showed Eva Gabrielsson for Stieg dad Erland and Kurdo Baksi shortly after the death of Stieg.
    - I’ve seen the script once. It was the home of Eva Gabrielsson. Stieg dad Erland was also there, says Kurdo Baksi.
    Probably because he had the script also Stieg computer, a white iBook laptop from Apple.
    - Dad gave it to the Expo after Stieg death because they could see if it also contain material that could be useful for Expo, “said Joakim Larsson.
    A release is unlikely
    A publication of the fourth book hindered partly by the fact that it has been printed – and by that Eva Gabrielsson almost certainly have left the script while copyrights belong to the family Larsson. An agreement from 2008 also says that the book should not be given out.
    - To posthumously complete a script that might exist, it need not be so lucky if you talk about the brand, “says Eva Gedin.
    Daniel Poohl says he went through the computer immediately after the death of Stieg and picked out the materials needed for the magazine Expo.
    - I saw no script in your computer. But I was looking not for something, “he says.
    Each computer then took the path he knows is not completely secure.
    - I came away when I went through it. I can not answer was it went, but I assume in that it was Eva. It is the only reasonable.
    Expressen have searched Eva Gabrielsson.

  • Fio

    Daniel is shooting NOW!!
    Malak: Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is filming next door today… David Fincher & Daniel Craig must me nearby… #fb
    7 minutes ago via Twitter for iPhone

  • Fio

    Hi, Guinness
    “I want a “sit down” with him!”
    Yeah, so do I!!

    I want to be a ‘man’! Really…
    Bond in a Frock

  • Fio

    RUSH!!!!! lol
    DMacAndrew: Daniel Craig outside – ground floor ladies very excited.
    7 minutes ago via TweetDeck
    GParrett88: Daniel Craig outside the office! #007
    6 minutes ago via TweetDeck
    JamesRBishop: Whole office agog at Daniel Craig filming outside our offices. Personally I wish it was Pussy Galore.
    4 minutes ago via Twitter for iPhone
    JemmaKGreen: confirmed..Daniel Craig filming next door, wearing a nice grey cardy
    4 minutes ago via web
    PaulPonting: Daniel Craig is filming at St Johns on St John Street across from where im sitting. BOND IS BACK!
    3 minutes ago via web
    richardholt: Just saw “James Bond” himself Daniel Craig filming outside work. I bet he secretly wishes he was a graphic designer. #fb
    1 minute ago via Tweetie for Mac
    MikeWard25: Daniel Craig out side our office filming… Must be the new Bond movie right?
    half a minute ago via web

  • Fio

    With Rachel :)
    But…why? Rachel gives support to Daniel?
    PaulPonting: celeb spot outside my window. Daniel Craig and Rachel Weisz both in St Johns
    7 minutes ago via web

  • Zeal


    Wasn’t the person who was crying about Rachel making Daniel buy her something the same nutcase running around crying that both Rachel and Daniel are homewreckers? Anyway, Rachel said in interviews that she not the type of women who likes to be kept by a rich man, that she buys her own things, so that right there is proof positive that Daniel was not buying anything for her.


    Word is that Daniel was on the set of 360 as well.

  • Fio

    Hi, Zeal
    Yeah, Rachel has enough money to buy anything, so they may have given present to one another something as a remembrance…

    “Word is that Daniel was on the set of 360 as well.”
    Oh, if it’s so, they help each other in an ideal manner!!

  • guinness

    Yey! Fio is back in action. Nice. and I dont twitter, so this helps alot! (what is your handle for twittering Fio? I will follow!!)

    Dan in a cardy can still be blomvkist, right? and filming for 007 isn’t now? I dont’ think james would hopefully not wear that gray cardy–but Dan wears it well!!! ?) i guess i havent’ paid too much attention at his schedule, ffs. but thanks for “the tracking of Dan Craig–He thought nagging paps were bad?–how bout twitterers tracking his footsteps?” But we love you!!!!
    Seriously, paps–if you want a story that will be unbelievable, follow me for a day. just one day. not any more–cuz i will give you the finger.

    FIO–it seems we are either on the same wave lenght today, or that Mondays are the “sex-days” of the week, or things are just looking up!! but my article is about testosterone too—the author in your article writes with anger–he wants to be funny–but he is offensive(I know–he thinks I am a haterfeminist–but i love penises, just not offensive penises), and he harbors a hurt feelings toward us, and i feel sorry for him. BUT, my article is awesome and is “reverse-sexist” and i embrace it…it is revenge? and am i wrong to want and perpetuate reverse sexism? ho hum. ahhhh—Dan should be plotted in the middle of the UK. And they should have had a graphic with a circle doing a closeup of an example of the “said” 7inches on average. I could go futher, but I ahvce seemded to have lost the abliitly to thype corretectly/… what say you fio–anything?

    ~Mendel? do you need a Dan-bear/bare-hug? you ok?

  • guinness

    holy carp! they moderated the words in the link!!! If interested in my pubescent stupid article–but funny that someone spent time researching such data(damn, I am in the wrong career path) , it is on that website listed, and type in the appropriate word for the man’s love wand beginning with a “P”. or not. I think this may be getting outa hand! get it? outa hand, hand and out of yours? ok.

    um. I gotto go.
    Hi Fio.
    Have you seen mendel? Did she defect anonymously?

  • Zeal

    Here are pictures with Rachel and Daniel shopping;

    Now here are two things: The daily mail is notoriously know for making things up. How so? They are the same paper that said that Rachel left her son at Christmas to be with Daniel while it was proven that her son was with her during that time.

    Second, look at the pictures carefully. There is a picture there with a saleswoman talking to Rachel while Daniel is getting into the car. Now i worked in retail, sales people don’t talk to you unless you’re the one spending the money, so theses pictures are proof positive that Rachel was the one buying things. Not Daniel.

  • Fio

    More pics – Daniel and Rachel at Louis Vuitton
    Hi, Guinness
    Yeah, David Fincher is there, too :)
    Malak: Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is filming next door today… David Fincher & Daniel Craig must me nearby… #fb
    BoolasBakery: Apparently Daniel Craig is shooting Girl with the Dragon Tattoo outside the office. Wonder if I will bump into him?
    4 minutes ago via web

  • Zeal


    just pos@Fio:

    Those pictures are proof positive that Rachel was the one spending money, not Daniel. Look at the sales person talking to Rachel while Daniel was getting into the car.

  • Fio

    Oops, sorry Zeal. My post coincided with yours.

  • Zeal


    No problem:)

  • to Zeal

    I don’t care who’s spending the money, but your comment is ridicolous. Maybe you work at a very low key retail shop. When you go to a shop like that, the salewomen will kiss youre feet if you enter the room with someone like Daniel.
    That would be very bad for the reputation of that shop if they would ignore Rachel.

  • My guess

    Daniel holds his man purse in that pic. It seemed immediately after he paid money. But frankly, my dear, I don’t give a damn. Indeed.

  • to 142

    the man purse is a blue baseball cap LOL

  • Daniel is Hot

    I thought it was a baseball cap as well. No man purse to me. Good of you Fio and Zeal to post the extra pictures. Maybe they were buying gifts for family and friends. If Daniel was buying something for Rachel, he might want it to be a surprise. When he was buying something for the ex, he would go alone to the store. He is a generious guy, and has lots of family members and friends he buys presents for. Rachel too I bet.

  • Zeal

    @to Zeal:

    Actually, i use to work at Saks Fifth Avenue in NY as a sales person/ Overnight inventory and store promotions, so i find you getting upset over what i said very strange. I’m only telling you how things are done. Second, If you have seen the pictures, Daniel’s wallet is in his front pants pocket, not his man purse.In fact, his cell and his wallet is in the front pockets. Third, the person talking to Rachel is a personal shopper, who is employed by the store to help people pick out what they want or suggest other items that they might be interested in and they only talk to the people who are making purchases. In fact, some are called in advance to prepare for the arrival of a potential customer.

    Again, those are my observations and they come from experience. Whether you think i said was ridiculous is entire up to you, but they’re the truth.

  • Zeal

    @Daniel is Hot:

    No problem:)

  • new thread
  • Zeal

    @Daniel is Hot:

    Actually, that does in fact look like a baseball cap. If its a man purse, its the skinniest man purse i have ever seen.

  • to Zeal

    Maybe the people working in the US are that rude. In the UK they speak to you and interact with you, even if you are not the person who pays. It’s called customer orientation.

  • Mendel

    Hi Guinness

    “Have you seen mendel? Did she defect anonymously?”

    Hahahaha, no, nothing as dramatic. No arrests. And I wasn’t anywhere near expensive food hampers either ;)

    “dah–this was an incredible show of suupport, but alas, Tories are everywhere….”

    Indeed! Great demo though!

    “I want a “sit down” with him!
    ah, and then sit ON him? no, yes, yes, yes, no. but yes. ”

    Yes! Definitely a yes!

    to Fio

    thanks for all the links and tweets! Great info!

    to Guinness

    “He thought nagging paps were bad?–how bout twitterers tracking his footsteps?” But we love you!!!!”

    Yes we do! Although, got a bit distracted from my Danness this weekend *grin* But Danness is back now :)

    “(I know–he thinks I am a haterfeminist–but i love penises, just not offensive penises)”

    And Dan’s PFA!

    to DiH

    “He is a generious guy, and has lots of family members and friends he buys presents for. Rachel too I bet.”

    Definitely. But I doubt they were shopping on Saturday…and not in Fortnum and Mason..

    Must check out the new thread now…