Top Stories

Rachel McAdams: 'Midnight' in New York City!

Rachel McAdams: 'Midnight' in New York City!

Rachel McAdams is white hot at a screening of her new film, Midnight in Paris, on Tuesday (May 17) at the Tribeca Grand Screening Room in NYC.

The 32-year-old actress paired her Louis Vuitton dress with H. Stern jewelry and Christian Louboutin heels.

Rachel attended The Cinema Society and Thierry Mugler-hosted event with beau Michael Sheen and met up with director Woody Allen on the carpet.

Last week, Rachel hit the Cannes Film Festival to premiere Midnight and also come out to support the Sleeping Beauty premiere.

10+ pictures inside of Rachel McAdams at a NYC screening of Midnight in Paris

Like Just Jared on Facebook
rachel mcadams midnight paris nyc 01
rachel mcadams midnight paris nyc 02
rachel mcadams midnight paris nyc 03
rachel mcadams midnight paris nyc 04
rachel mcadams midnight paris nyc 05
rachel mcadams midnight paris nyc 06
rachel mcadams midnight paris nyc 07
rachel mcadams midnight paris nyc 08
rachel mcadams midnight paris nyc 09
rachel mcadams midnight paris nyc 10
rachel mcadams midnight paris nyc 11

JJ Links Around The Web

Wenn

26 Comments

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All
# 1

OHMYGOSH! She’s sooo gorgeous. Seriously, reminds me of Grace Kelly. Annndddd for anyone who’s seen Morning Glory, you’ll know she has thee best backside ever. Hahah. Better than Beyonce’s. She’s so perfect<3

# 2
dollymixture @ 05/17/2011 at 11:36 pm

Love Rachel Adams! she is so amazing in the notebook!! Love from Scotland! :)

# 3

She’s been looking really good lately, Being in love suits her.

# 4

Gorgeous. I wonder if Michael minds playing second fiddle to Rachel. I think he’s the more talented of the two but she seems to get the headlines more. Wonder if it bothers him? I like them together, hope it works out.

# 6

She is a very beautiful woman.

# 7
Regean break @ 05/18/2011 at 1:08 am

BEGGED FOR SHERLOCK HOLMES
RACHEL McAdams was so desperate to be in new movie Sherlock Holmes, she had to beg director Guy Ritchie for her part.
The actress — who plays Irene Adler alongside Robert Downey, Jr. and Jude Law in the hotly-anticipated flick — joked that she sat outside Ritchie’s house until he agreed to cast her.
“I hunted Guy down and camped on his doorstep until he relented!” McAdams told Total Film magazine. “OK, no, we had a chat in a garden and it went from there… Fortunately, it worked out for me.”

# 8
Regean break @ 05/18/2011 at 1:09 am

Lainey Gossip – Article – SHERLOCK HOLMES
Have you seen Sherlock Holmes? And Rachel’s performance? The strength of the film is the chemistry between RDJ and Jude Law. The weakness of the film, aside from an unnecessarily twisty plot, was McAdams. You know I love her. But that role was totally miscast.
Laura and Michelle thought Rachel Weisz would have been an excellent candidate. Sure. But, just to be contrarian, wasn’t the point of that part that she end up forgettable? I mean the way she’s – SPOILER ALERT – dismissed at the end, rather painlessly in fact, implies that Holmes really, after it all, didn’t care much for her. Or perhaps that’s what ended up happening after Guy Ritchie worked with her.
Maybe it’s just me but I get a distinct no-homies vibe between the two of them. In their interviews, there’s some tension. And not the sexual kind.
But now it’s a million different tangents when the only two points I wanted to make in the first place were that: 1. I like her dress but I don’t love her dress it and Diane’s ensemble is better and 2. She was rather disappointing in Sherlock Holmes, agree or disagree?

# 9
Regean break @ 05/18/2011 at 1:12 am

Lena @ 05/02/2011 at 7:34 pm
She’s been 32 for the past two years…

Regean break @ 05/18/2011 at 1:13 am

38
Rachel McAdams is too young to lie about her age—or is she?
The star of Wedding Crashers and The Notebook claims she was born in October 1978, making her 28. But imdb.com puts her birthday in 1976—and those who’ve looked into the matter believe the earlier date may be accurate.
In a November 2005 profile, Details listed McAdams’s age as 29, prompting her then-publicist, Ame Van Iden, to complain vigorously. (McAdams later fired Van Iden, reportedly because the flack booked her to appear nude on Vanity Fair’s cover without her consent.) A Details source says the magazine agreed to run a correction only after Van Iden assured them that IMDb had been notified of its error.
As of yesterday, however, the site was still listing her as 30. When Elle wrote McAdams up for its April cover, it got around the problem by saying, “IMDb states [she] is 30, but [she] is really, truly, ask her mother, 28.”
What’s the truth? “Her birthday is inaccurately reported,” says her rep. “She is 28 years old.” But a source involved with one of her recent films says it’s “no secret among the producers” that she shaves a couple years off her age in interviews—only to add them back on when she’s up for a part that calls for a more “mature” actress.
Wikipedia, for the record, lists her age as 28, but notes that “her exact year of birth is unknown. Some websites list it as 1976 and some websites list it as 1978. This means that she could be between the ages of 28 and 30.”
@

Regean break @ 05/18/2011 at 1:13 am

The Movie Star Next Door
Source: Instyle • Date: October 19, 2010 • Scans
Introduction Rachel McAdams
Rachel McAdams’ Morning Glory had a bit of a disappointing opening week with an estimated $9.2 million. MOVIE STAR NEXT DOOR

Regean break @ 05/18/2011 at 1:15 am

SHE AUDITIONED FOR SHERLOCK HOLMES AND OFFERED A CAMEO FOR THE SEQUEL

Regean break @ 05/18/2011 at 1:17 am

MARION COTILLARD IS IN THE FILM – OSCAR WINNER

Regean break @ 05/18/2011 at 1:21 am

Wikipedia Website
BOX OFFICE SUCCESS

RED EYE – RACHEL MCADAMS

Budget $26,000,000

Gross revenue $95,577,774
Directed by Wes Craven
Produced by Chris Bender
Marianne Maddalena
Screenplay by Carl Ellsworth
Story by Carl Ellsworth
Dan Foos
Starring Rachel McAdams
Cillian Murphy
Brian Cox
Jayma Mays
Music by Marco Beltrami

Regean Brek is INSANE @ 05/18/2011 at 1:23 am

This guy along with all his (or her) screen names constantly comes to Rachel McAdams post to post the same spam to try desperately to discredit her. Who the F are you? What is your deal man? Are you some angry failed actor/actress who blames Rachel for your obvios failures and shortcomings at life.

I think its time for Jared to get login screenames for everyone to deal with the insane trollage happening on your site, Jared.

Regean break @ 05/18/2011 at 1:23 am

I can’t believe anyone liked the Family Stone. One of the worst movies I have ever seen. Waste of a great cast.

Regean break @ 05/18/2011 at 1:28 am

Rachel McAdams’s career confuses me. With one exception (last year’s $37 million-grossing State of Play, which was technically a Russell Crowe-Ben Affleck disaster), every wide-release movie she has appeared in since 2004’s Mean Girlshas done well at the North American box office. The Notebook: $81 million. Wedding Crashers: $209 million. Red Eye: $58 million.The Family Stone: $60 million. The Time Traveler’s Wife: $63 million. Sherlock Holmes: $209 million.
(Interesting aside: Lindsay Lohan’s Mean Girls costars, McAdams, Tina Fey and Amanda Seyfried, have all gone on to much bigger and better things than the film’s star.)
The success of exactly half of those films had little to do with her, and The Notebook was a triumph of word of mouth and a strong ensemble cast led by Ryan Gosling, another young actor with an interesting career (a subject for another post). But what would have become of Red Eye and The Time Traveler’s Wife without McAdams? The success of both certainly wasn’t based on the drawing power of her male costars, Cillian Murphy and Eric Bana, respectively.
Still, for all of her commercial success, McAdams is stuck on Hollywood’s B+ list. She’s no Sandra Bullock, no Jennifer Aniston, no Anne Hathaway. She’s beautiful, talented and likable, but there is something a bit generic about her. And unlike, say, Amy Adams, Oscar and Golden Globe nominations haven’t increased her red-carpet visibility. If you were dining in a restaurant, and McAdams walked in, would every head in the room turn in her direction to get a closer look

Regean break @ 05/18/2011 at 1:31 am

Anna Wintour – MET Ball 2011
Her daughter Bee Shaffer looked

@Regean break: You are scary

Justin Beaver @ 05/18/2011 at 1:53 am

God, you have great legs. Excellent body overall. She’s really sexy with her toned, shapely legs and has such a curvy and juicy body!

LEONARDO DICAPRIO FAN @ 05/18/2011 at 2:16 am

WOW! That’s all I have ot say. This woman deffinetely has class and style. And she is quite attractive too.
You rock Rachel!

stunningly beautiful!!

agnes adler @ 05/18/2011 at 8:54 am

I love Rachel & Michael.

He’s not playing second fiddle at all. She is the lead female star of the movie, he only plays a supporting role and is therefore letting her have the spotlight. She did the same for him last month in England when he starred in a 72 hour version of The Passion. She stayed behind the scenes and was very discrete, while he made the headlines. I’m sure she’ll do it again for him when he stars in Hamlet next fall.

They seem to have a lot of respect and love for each other and know how to support each other.

I love Rachel & Michael.

He’s not playing second fiddle at all. She is the lead female star of the movie, he only plays a supporting role and is therefore letting her have the spotlight. She did the same for him last month in England when he starred in a 72 hour version of The Passion. She stayed behind the scenes and was very discrete, while he made the headlines. I’m sure she’ll do it again for him when he stars in Hamlet next fall.

They seem to have a lot of respect and love for each other and know how to support each other.

Love her.. amazing actress, beautiful and lovely woman. Who can hate her?????

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here