Top Stories

Robert Pattinson On Set of 'Cosmopolis'!

Robert Pattinson On Set of 'Cosmopolis'!

Robert Pattinson suits up as he walks to the set of his new film, Cosmopolis, on Sunday (May 29) in Toronto, Canada.

The 24-year-old Twilight star filmed scenes with his co-stars Sarah Gadon and Kevin Durand at a local diner.

Robert is playing Eric Packer, a “financial wunderkind,” in the film based on Don DeLillo’s novel of the same name.

The David Cronenberg-directed drama will hit theaters sometime next year!

10+ pictures inside of Robert Pattinson on the set of Cosmopolis

Like Just Jared on Facebook
robert pattinson on set of cosmopolis 01
robert pattinson on set of cosmopolis 02
robert pattinson on set of cosmopolis 03
robert pattinson on set of cosmopolis 04
robert pattinson on set of cosmopolis 05
robert pattinson on set of cosmopolis 06
robert pattinson on set of cosmopolis 07
robert pattinson on set of cosmopolis 08
robert pattinson on set of cosmopolis 09
robert pattinson on set of cosmopolis 10

JJ Links Around The Web

FameFlynet Pictures

134 Responses to “Robert Pattinson On Set of 'Cosmopolis'!”

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] Show All

  1. 126
    hi Says:

    Let’s take your precious Harry Potter DH 1 for instance. I assume it takes 200 million to make. It earned domestically 295 million. It also earned 659 500 000 million overseas. So ten percent of that is 65 950 000 million and half of 295 million is 147 million. Factoring in some math we get WB only making 13 million in profit even though Potter almost broke the billion dollar threshold and is well known as being one of the most lucrative cash cow for WB. This all does not include DVD sales or the marketing budget. Phew.

    And your precious Lainey Gossip also said that WFE is a success:
    http://laineygossip.comMovies_for_adults_earn_well_in_first_half_of_2011_led_by_strong_opening_for_The_Hangover_Part_2_31ma.aspx?CatID=0&CelID=0

  2. 127
    @126 Says:

    EXACTLY!
    Finally someone is using their brain.
    The studio made a PROFIT of 13 million, IN THE THEATERS, not counting the DVD sales.
    THAT IS SUCCESSFUL!
    Not a movie still in theaters that has not earned the studio any money yet.
    Gee!
    I’m glad someone FINALLY got smart.
    Sure took you gals long enough!

  3. 128
    yea Says:

    Except your little formula is skewed since Harry Potter is a cash cow for WB in the box office since it is a SUMMER TENTPOLE. And using your math again, HP 6 lost money in the box office since it took 250 million to make and made less than DH 1 in the box office. AWWW poor Harry Potter. Lucky for Rob, Twilight makes most of its money in domestic sales and has a low production cost. Potter is a losing franchise with weak box office turnout. It’s cast won’t survive the box office game (Perks of Being a Wallflower and Women in Black).

    Another film critic,Lainey Gossip, said it was a success, why haven’t you responded to that? http://laineygossip.comMovies_for_adults_earn_well_in_first_half_of_2011_led_by_strong_opening_for_The_Hangover_Part_2_31ma.aspx?CatID=0&CelID=0

  4. 129
    @128 Says:

    The website won’t pull up for me, but Lainey is a gossip hound (and not a very good one) not a film critic.
    Are you going to quote Perez Hilton next?
    And I love how you call factual evidence a “little formula” since you don’t agree with it.
    ONE MORE TIME….
    Saying something does better than expected, does NOT mean that it was successful.
    But I guess that ‘simple math’ is too much for your ‘simple minds’ to grasp.

  5. 130
    yea Says:

    Don’t forget Potter has a marketing budget of approximately 100 million dollars. The studio incidentally won’t make any money until they get to DVD sales, so Potter won’t even make any money while it is still in theaters!
    And according to WB, while Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire earned a worldwide total of $938.2, Warner Bros has got it down as still losing $167 million (http://bestmoviesevernews.com)! Funny that Potter is box office poison, more so than WFE.

  6. 131
    @127 Says:

    Don’t forget Potter has a marketing budget of approximately 100 million dollars. The studio incidentally won’t make any money until they get to DVD sales, so Potter won’t even make any money while it is still in theaters!
    And according to WB, while Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire earned a worldwide total of $938.2, Warner Bros has got it down as still losing $167 million (http://bestmoviesevernews.com)! Funny that Potter is box office poison, more so than WFE.

  7. 132
    @129 Says:

    No, I wouldn’t bring up Perez Hilton. We are on a gossip site so I thought you would like some more gossip to help you understand. Your low reading comprehension skills hopefully may pick it up as actual film analysts seem to fly over your head. Either way, the potter franchise and it stars are box office poison now and in the future thanks to your formula.

    Let me link it for you again since you are so stubborn:
    http://laineygossip.com/Movies_for_adults_earn_well_in_first_half_of_2011_led_by_strong_opening_for_The_Hangover_Part_2_31ma.aspx?CatID=0&CelID=0

  8. 133
    sheesh Says:

    So you are interpreting Lainey’s “performed decently”, as her saying that it was a success???
    Performed decently, and ‘did better than expected’ are NOT the same thing as saying that it was successful.
    But go ahead, believe what you want. You continue to ignore facts because they keep proving you wrong.

  9. 134
    @133 Says:

    Nobody is ignoring facts….just your unusual interpretation of them! Your formula that is oh so accurate in determining success is obviously a whole load of crap unless you want to admit that it makes nearly every movie a failure including harry potter!

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] Show All

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here