Top Stories

Rachel Weisz: Bulgari's New Face for Jasmin Noir Fragrance!

Rachel Weisz: Bulgari's New Face for Jasmin Noir Fragrance!

Rachel Weisz has been chosen as the new face for Bulgari‘s Jasmin Noir fragrance, according to WWD.

The 41-year-old actress will be featured in a campaign for the fragrance due out in August. The campaign was shot by photographers Mert Alas and Marcus Piggott, who “opted for a seductive and sophisticated boudoir-style aura.”

Rachel recently married Daniel Craig after dating since late last year. The pair have known each other for many years and grew close while filming the upcoming movie Dream House.

WHAT DO YOU THINK
of Rachel Weisz as the new face of Bulgari‘s fragrance?

Like Just Jared on Facebook

JJ Links Around The Web

Wenn
  • How many glasses of wine can Gerard Depardieu drink a day?- US Weekly
  • Joan Rivers' doctor was also Celine Dion's doctor- TMZ
  • Macklemore is the latest victim of a death hoax- Gossip Cop
  • Check out cast portraits for Jane the Virgin - Just Jared Jr
  • Bill Hader will host Saturday Night Live- Entertainment Weekly
  • Curly Sue star Alisan Porter opens up about battle with alcoholism- Huffington Post
  • Rosario Dawson is reportedly up for a role in True Detective 2 - Lainey Gossip
  • Doctor Who star Matt Smith joins the cast of Pride and Prejudice and Zombies- The Hollywood Reporter
  • Ana Braga shows off her sexy bikini body- Hollywood Tuna

44 Comments

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All
# 1

i think Rachel looks beautiful, as always, in this photo.

# 2

Yuck she’s hideous.

# 3

Adultery always pays off.

# 4

Rachel looks sooooooo young for her age!! She’s absolutely stunning.

# 5

taylor @ 07/02/2011 at 3:05 am

Rachel and Darren were not married. so how exactly did she commit adultery.

# 6

It is a right decision that Bulgari chose Rachel. She has inherent dignity.

# 7

i am so glad for her……she is so beautiful, seductive, sophisticated and smart ….. i love her classic beauty :-)
i love her :)

# 8

Lovely news!! I like Rachel Weisz better than Kirsten Dunst as Bulgari’s face.

# 9

I don’t care about her marriage but I hate the constant lie “became close after separating from their former partners”. This is blatantly untrue – his fiance was apparently in a state of shock after becoming friendly with Rachel during the filming of “Dream House” only to find out that her lover, with whom she had lived for quite some time, was having an affair with Rachel, who was also still in a relationship with her long-time partner. Marriages that start like that can end badly though I certainly don’t wish them harm. What goes around, comes around.

It is certainly none of our business but why the obvious lie? The public isn’t stupid.

i though kirsten dunst was chosen already for this campaign?? btw love rachel!

You do not know anything.
You nothing but believe the tabloid.
Because you want to believe it, you only believe it.

lexy hates bilson @ 07/02/2011 at 6:43 am

Always nice to see a TALENTED Rachel on this site for a change!!

Her good looks attract the stares of many people!

Love her, she is beautiful, and shes got Dan. Go girl!

Woot!!
Rachel Weisz is my favorite actress. She and Daniel Craig are the hottest couple ever!

Thank Goodness @ 07/02/2011 at 10:36 am

@taylor:

How can she commit adultery when she’s never been married? Clueless person…

BTW, Rachel is stunning as usual!

I am a 28 years old doctor, mature and beautiful.and now I am seeking a good man who can give me real love , so i got a username Andromeda2002 on–s’e'ek’c'ou’ga’r.c óm–.it is the first and best club for y’ounger women and old’er men, or older women and y’ounger men,to int’eract with each other. Maybe you wanna ch’eck ‘it out or tell your friends!
Rachel Weisz is my favorite actress. She and Daniel Craig are the hottest couple ever!

Why did you steal my comment?

@Mia:

It’s that the same daily mail that said Rachel left her son in the holidays to be with Daniel only to be proven wrong when in fact her son was with her all along? You think the daily mail is a leginamte source of news? Especially with growing reports surfacing that it was Rachel’s ex Darren who was cheating all the long?

Grow up

to Mia @ 07/02/2011 at 6:04 am +10

You do not know anything.
You nothing but believe the tabloid.
Because you want to believe it, you
————————————————–
I don’t believe the tabloids but I also don’t believe all this PR about their affair. It means nothing to me but why lie? They started their relationship back in the Spring of 2010, told their former partners and moved on. These things happen in life and I am actually amazed that he has married a woman of his own age and not someone 15-20 years younger.

Do people actually marry after an affair of 6 months? Come on…

I see that their PR team is working hard on this board.

Nick @ 07/02/2011 at 12:23 pm -1

@Mia:

It’s that the same daily mail that said Rachel left her son in the holidays to be with Daniel only to be proven wrong when in fact her son was with her all along? You think the daily mail is a leginamte source of news? Especially with growing reports surfacing that it was Rachel’s ex Darren who was cheating all the long?

Grow up
——————————————————-
Same person commenting about me – same spelling mistakes. I DON’T CARE ABOUT THEIR AFFAIR OR THEIR LIVES. BUT I DON’T LIKE THESE PR LIES. Everyone knows that their PR person is not telling the truth, even the Huffington Post have a laugh about it.

They should be adult enough to admit it and move on after all they have both been involved with a lot of people over the past 20 years.

Mia @ 07/02/2011 at 12:36 pm

if you don’t care about their affair, as you call it, then why bring it up. you obviously do care, why else would you keep bringing it up. you say that “they should be adult enough to admit it”. where do you get the idea that Daniel and Rachel should have to admit to anything. they are not required to explain anything they’ve done to you or anyone else. you, personally, don’t like the way Rachel and Daniel allegedly got together too bad. as a previous poster said ; Grow up! and move on.

Questions of a fan @ 07/02/2011 at 2:41 pm

By the way Susan, this is the SAME Daily Mail. That reported their Marriage and got it confirmed by their reps!(NOTW did as well) If you refuse to believe the article that’s fine. But Mia has a point here and I agree with it. Someone confirmed that this romance started on set of DH. You and others don’t want to face the truth which is much clearer now than 7 months ago. And I don’t think she(mia) cares about the marriage as do I. Whatever floats their boat….but they should come clean and admit it and stop the lying. The reason I think they keep doing so is because they know that it will tarnish their image and both care heavily about their careers. Enough Said. So you grow up and move on. Stop thinking you always have to say something when someone talks about Daniel and actually speaks the truth. Gosh you have such a BIG mouth!. I’m beginning to wonder if you work for Daniel.

Whoever choses Rachel for an ad is a winner. She’s stunning and intriguing.

wised cracked @ 07/02/2011 at 3:22 pm

Yo peeps…get your facts straight! They dated -probably long before you were born, awhile back sometime 20 yrs ago and still good friends from there:

http://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/stars_sizzle_before_wedding_5XVpotTIBjqFq2K6hm1cSN

Its not like they just met on the set, then all the sudden they’re married like you all are quoting, then making asumptions of their future married relationship?

Yeah, like you all never ever cheated or tell a lie? Who gives you the right to judge?

Im totally happy for them and GOOD for them that they’re married. Yeaay!! :D :D

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here