Top Stories

Maddox Jolie-Pitt Not Starring in Brad Pitt's 'Battling Boy'

Maddox Jolie-Pitt Not Starring in Brad Pitt's 'Battling Boy'

Maddox Jolie-Pitt will not be be making his feature film debut just yet, as widely reported by many media outlets.

The son of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, who turned 10 years old last week, was rumored to play a villain-battling boy with special powers as the son of a god. Good dad Brad is producing the flick with his production company Plan B.

Sources have confirmed to that the rumors are “not true.”

Battling Boy was originally a graphic novel that was optioned by Paramount Pictures for the film version.

Like Just Jared on Facebook

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Read a recap for the latest episode of The Bachelor- US Weekly
  • Who is Lil Wayne taking when he leaves his record label?- TMZ
  • Porn star Mia Khalifa says Drake sent her Instagram messages- Gossip Cop
  • Ryan Beatty covers TLC's hit song 'Waterfalls' - Just Jared Jr
  • Chelsea Clinton shows off her post-baby body- Radar
  • Jane Fonda gives her honest thoughts on gender biased film studios- Huffington Post
  • Read a review for Johnny Depp's film Mortdecai- Lainey Gossip
  • Molly Shannon talks about her worst acting audition- The Hollywood Reporter

56 Responses to “Maddox Jolie-Pitt Not Starring in Brad Pitt's 'Battling Boy'”

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All

  1. 1
    juju Says:

    this is b u l s h i t
    angelina & brad
    have said that
    don’t want their kids
    to b actors
    but if that’s what they want
    only when they are older

  2. 2
    MOXIE Says:

    These children have structure and routine and are with their parents and siblings, they are getting a wonderful education and speak multiple languages.

    Maddox is not going into acting, Brad and Angie aren’t the Smiths. Just another lie so people will harp on this family. STUPID!`

  3. 3
    turth be told Says:

    As usual the haters got it all wrong. Huffnpuff Post the news LOL copies tabloid stories as fact all the time when it comes to Angelina and Brad. So tired of these really stupid haters.

  4. 4
    Ho Bags Says:

    this is a joke?

  5. 5
    Brad Pimp Says:


  6. 6
    whip yo hair maddox Says:

    i guess they don’t have enough $ or attention

  7. 7
    bizzy bee Says:

    @Jared my comment will stay in moderation.

  8. 8
    TO #6 Says:


  9. 9
    alana Says:

    Why are some so eager to believe tabloid lies instead of believing what Brad and Angie actually say? They both have said they would support their kids if they wanted to go into acting, but only after they were adults. These are smart, loving parents, they don’t deserve this rush to judgement based on tabloid stories that are ALWAYS WRONG,.

  10. 10
    pavlov Says:

    @TO #6: naw, just like pissing tards off like you

  11. 11
    Domino Says:

    As I said before Jared deleted (you’re not biased at all JJ, so much for being objective) it’s not a surprise, they’ve been selling their kids forever. At least now we know why they keep adopting. Easy money!

  12. 12
    I n F a m o u s l y C o o L Says:

    …Now nobody can knock people putting their kids in movies.

  13. 13
    Media Wh@re MANiston Says:

    I didn’t believe when I 1st heard it. I won’t believe it until Brad & Angie confirm.

  14. 14
    Domino Says:

    @alana: That’s funny, especially coming from a bunch of people (Brangiel@@nies) who believe what tabloids say about everyone else.

  15. 15
    WBPfan Says:

    I commented on the previous thread you had up which stated that Maddox was going to do the film. All I wrote was I doubted it because the source you quoted wasn’t reliable. For this I get sent to moderation? I didn’t use foul language or offend you personally for printing this unreliable source yet I get sent to moderation while other filthy language comments go through. Guess its time for me to stop reading this site.

  16. 16
    hey domino pizza head Says:

    does it hurt to be so stupid?

  17. 17
    Media Wh@re MANiston Says:

    Domino @ 08/12/2011 at 10:12 pm


  18. 18
    Domino Says:

    Those are your replies, Brangiel@@nies? Seriously? Wow. I guess I gave you too much credit.

  19. 19
    alana Says:

    i don’t read or believe anything in a tabloid, no matter who the story is about, that would be IGNORANT.

  20. 20
    Domino Says:

    I’m closing this, I’m sorry if I’ll make you sad by leaving and not reading your intelligent replies, people. I just can’t stand the face of that ugly kid and Brad looking more like a mummy each day. Gbye. :*

  21. 21
    Thank you jared Says:

    At least you checked on the sources while other dumb websites blindly reported from tabloids.

  22. 22
    linh Says:

    Brad’s lookin’ rough…

  23. 23
    Ghost Says:

    You posted my comment and then you pulled it. Don’t censor my comments you communist Fvck. I have a right to the freedom of speech that everyone else here has . Have you ever looked up the word blog you stupid ignorant little fvcking puke ? Re-post my comment …

  24. 24
    Funny Article Says:

    If Maddox does decide to act, we know one person he can act circles around
    Hilarious Article
    You May Be Considered Pretty by Some, but Lady, You Can’t Act: Hollywood’s Top Female Charlatans
    Let’s get real, shall we? Everyone knows there are certain actresses out there who get work because of the way they look or a certain likability factor, rather than any genuine ability to put on a show. One of the funniest things I’ve seen was Jennifer Aniston on “Inside the Actor’s Studio,” (research!) making faces while talking about her acting coach, who told her she was a disgrace to the Russian theater—she clearly believes she has proven him wrong, but most of us know better. I really had to watch to see how James Lipton would handle Aniston (with kid gloves) and vice versa (tight-lipped, overly cautious, stilted). That Lipton brought up and even promoted her SmartWater endorsement as a part of her career was a show low.
    Aniston is pretty enough (in certain light) and she seems to have charmed a particular audience—especially women—though, not me. But if you’ve ever seen Aniston on a talk show, it becomes obvious that The Rachel’s shtick on “Friends” was just Aniston letting out her own personality quirks. Everything she does is a variation on The Rachel; The Good Girl was The Rachel on quaaludes, The Break Up was The Rachel letting out her feelings post Brad Pitt and Derailed was The Rachel miserably failing at badassery. I haven’t seen Horrible Bosses; from what I’ve read, it features The Horny Rachel.
    But never fear, Aniston is not alone. And among her peers is an inexplicable Oscar winner, so surely these ladies can go on believing they are “artists” practicing their “craft.” You know that old saying, “If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again.” Unfortunately, I’m sure they will.
    Check out the picture they have, it’s the naked tie picture she took for Marley and Me where her paws were covering her boobs and she looked like she was panting like a dog. Hahahahahaha

  25. 25
    Ghost Says:

    Iv’e typed 2 additional comments that JJ will not post. Maybe it’s time to look at this blog for what it really is . nothing more than a Communist outlet for JJ…

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here