Top Stories

Rachel Bilson: 'Hart of Dixie' Debuts Next Week!

Rachel Bilson: 'Hart of Dixie' Debuts Next Week!

Rachel Bilson leaves her house wearing a bright green blouse on Wednesday (September 21) in Los Feliz, Calif.

The 30-year-old actress’s new show, Hart of Dixie, premieres this Monday (September 26) at 9/8c on The CW!

Rachel, who covers the October issue of Women’s Health, told the mag she loves a vintage look but not “things that look too pulled together.”

“I like the casual touch on a dressy outfit. A vintage dress with designer shoes is always a safe bet,” she shared. “Or a vintage blouse with a pair of jean shorts.”

FYI: Rachel is wearing a Vanessa Bruno blazer.

Like Just Jared on Facebook
rachel bilson hart of dixie starts next week 01
rachel bilson hart of dixie starts next week 02
rachel bilson hart of dixie starts next week 03
rachel bilson hart of dixie starts next week 04
rachel bilson hart of dixie starts next week 05
rachel bilson hart of dixie starts next week 06

JJ Links Around The Web

Getty

82 Responses to “Rachel Bilson: 'Hart of Dixie' Debuts Next Week!”

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 » Show All

  1. 51
    @45, 50 Says:

    Guys, the OC is over, for years.

  2. 52
    @"Kaleyaka@Seriously. Says:

    @@Seriously: Try scrolling past comments you don’t like and you will feel much better. Snookums. LOL.
    Not everyone has to like everyone in the world and play nice just because you say so. This is a gossip blog not a fan forum. Go back to Rachelonline or one of those others sites if you can’t handle comments like that about ” your” Rachel
    Go to any thread on .JJ. about any actor,actress,singer, etc. and you will find negative comments by people. That is a the nature of a gossip site. The very word gossip is negative by its self . Rachel threads just happen to have more negative comments to the extreme and positive comments to the extreme. Probably four people going back and forth fighting. Using thirty or so different names. You being one of them Kaley. Some people are just tired of seeing her constantly posted on here for years. So take your own advice if you don’t like a comment ignore them. Hell ignore mine I don’t care. Which you probably will. But don’t tell someone to just scroll past all Rachel posts because you say so. If everyone that posted negative comments scrolled by every thread about Rachel and several others on here, no one would ever click on the links anymore ,Then J.J wouldn’t exist as a gossip blog anymore. Because during some months Rachel is posted two or three times a day until everyones head is beaten in with her name.
    Don’t go to a gossip site and expect cookies and kittens. You won’t find them. :)

  3. 53
    @51 Says:

    @@45, 50: So is Rachel’s career after last nights premiere of Hart of Dixie. XD But then again it probably died back when the OC got canceled. Her career has just been a zombie ever since. Moving around but empty XD The same for Mischa Barton.

  4. 54
    surprised o.0 Says:

    This is a case of a person saying one thing and doing another.
    http://rachel-online.org/2011/09/1587/
    Rachel’s interview with USA Today. Where she clearly states she refuses to talk about her and Hayden.
    http://rachel-online.org/2011/09/rachel-bilson-interview-with-watch-magazine/
    Rachel’s interview with WATCH. Where she clearly talks about her and Hayden.
    So which is it. I don’t talk about it or I sometimes do whenever it helps promote a show.
    Both interviews were done a little while ago. One while she was filming the first few episodes earlier this year on location.(USA Today).The second was done in August or early September.
    Just seems if you are going to say something like I don’t talk about my personal life then you just don’t do it. I was really surprised to find these two interviews back to back on Rachelonline. It made her seem like a bit of a hypocrite. Why talk about certain things at all? She didn’t on Chelsea Lately last week. I like Rachel as an actress and loved her on the OC but if she is going to play the part of a private person than she should “act” like one. Seems like the questions were placed to draw attention to the interview and of course to the new show. It seems a bit tacky.
    Also in the second interview. She damn near dissed Hayden.
    Watch!: Many others think you are, too, for having snagged Hayden Christensen as a boyfriend. In Hart you’ll be making out with some super-hunky dudes. Does Hayden, as a fellow thespian, understand that that’s all just “acting”?
    Rachel: He understands but … well, we close our eyes if we have to watch the other person do that. Or I should say, I make him close his eyes!
    Makes it sound like she is the only one that has those kinds of scenes with other people.Like she is the only one that acts. Seemed kind of a thoughtless statement.But again why allow the question at all? You can always say before an interview you refuse to answer anything of that nature. Unless they are trying to start some rumors about Rachel and her costars. Which it seems like in every article on line talking about the new show, they keep talking about all the ” cute boys” on the show. Even Rachel says it herself. Seems a desperate attempt to promote the show. Rachel should be better than that.

  5. 55
    surprised o.0 Says:

    http://hollywoodcrush.mtv.com/2011/09/26/rachel-bilson-hart-of-dixie-preview/
    I guess you never know with the promotion of shows or movies. Case and point Taylor Lautner and his co star Lily Collins. They broke up months ago yet used their relationship to promote to boom of a movie Abduction. Which I saw. It was awful Because it was poorly written but anyways back on topic. They used the Taylor/Lily pairing in interviews just last week where they avoided talking about each other to keep things private. Then in the next interview would talk about each other. Then after the movie came out everyone found out they had broken up months before. Today they were seen together on the red carpet posing arm in arm. Which is further press for Abduction because it is an awkward reunion. It just seems like everyone is exploiting their personal life more than ever before. Even Rachel is being a” flip flopper” Saying one thing and doing another all to promote a show. What really sucks about it , is that it didn’t even help the premiere of the show. Which I actually liked well enough to watch it again next week. I wonder which way she will go come Oct 6th when she is set to appear on Regis and Kelly and Jimmy Fallon. Will she stick to ” I don’t talk about my personal life” or use it to promote the show. She should stick to her guns or not say it to begin with. Otherwise as a fan it is hard to believe anything else she does say.

  6. 56
    Summer (O)f (C)r*p Says:

    LOL, in a population of 300 million only 1.8 million watched Hart! And now they’re putting Rachel ‘dumb as a box of rocks’ Bilson up against House! Seriously, WTF!!! Guess CW want to kill this ratings bomb off real quickly!!!

  7. 57
    congrats Says:

    Heart of Dixie was really good, I like the show alot! Congrats to Rachel and the cast for a down to earth show that was enjoyable to watch! Hope it continues to do well, there has been alot of twitter traffic that is very postive about it, and the show and Rachel were trending on Yahoo last night.

  8. 58
    #57 Says:

    Positive twitter traffic is so very relevant – *snorts in amusement* – forget ratings, we don’t need no f***ing ratings, coz we got positive twitter traffic from a bunch of twits. Yep, that’s gonna sell the show for sure. LMFAO!

  9. 59
    what an idiot! Says:

    How does a shameful 1.8 M viewers could be considered that “its doing welll”?!
    And plzzz its not even comparable to the “3.50 Million viewers” that Gossip Girl had achieved during its pilot episode in 2007 – go figure!
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gossip_Girl_(season_1)

  10. 60
    Kaley Says:

    @surprised o.0: Or maybe she was meaning that saying I make him close his eyes so he doesn’t get mad at seeing her kiss someone else. You people need to grow up, nobody really cares, and you’re “surprised” that that rachel website posted those back to back? They are articles mainly about hart of dixie, not about Hayden, you and a few others are the only people that obsess over what’s going on between Hayden and Rachel. How do you know which interview she did first? You don’t. That question that she answered about Hayden was kind of a direct question, it wasn’t just are you and Hayden dating? Were she could have just said I don’t talk about it.

  11. 61
    Kaley Says:

    @Summer (O)f (C)r*p: The reason for the crappy views: IT’S ON THE CW. Not the best channel out there. The show is good I like it, I think it’ll increase viewers as the episodes go on.

  12. 62
    surprised o.0 Says:

    @Kaley: It is called a pre interview. They are always done before any interview. Printed or in front of a camera.To avoid surprise questions. Basic rules of the industry that is what public relations reps are for to prevent those questions. No I wasn’t surprised it was on Rachelonline back to back. I was surprised she would say one thing and do another. I have been one of the few people that still defend her against a lot of the things people say on here. Like her being a hypocrite or calling the press for attention. So I was surprised to actually see something that made her look like a hypocrite. Just because someone is a fan of someone doesn’t mean I can’t question them if I want to. Fans put time and money into the actors and actresses’ careers they follow. So if I want to question Rachel’s behavior I can. just because you are one of the few fans left that think she is perfect, doesn’t mean I have to act like that. Sheesh. You jump on everyone on Rachel threads. The haters and the fans that don’t post a comment that in your opinion is right. Seriously get over yourself.Let people be a fan as they choose to be or even not be a fan of her if they so choose. Is it really going to make such a difference in your life? If it does you have more issues than you want to admit I think.
    Also there have been CW shows with good reviews in the past few years. Such as Vampire Diaries. Unfortunately some of the shows with the best reviews have been canceled. A critic isn’t going to give it a bad review just because its network has a bad rep . A network gets its bad rep because of airing shows with bad reviews. Not the other way around.CW has done everything to promote Hart of Dixie actually. It just isn’t enough I guess.o.0 If the ratings don’t go up in the week several episodes then I guess the ratings speak for themselves and the audience just wasn’t there for it. Which generally means the show just wasn’t good enough to tune in. If a show is great people tune in. Especially after all the promotion Hart has received this year
    .@what an idiot!: o.0 I was always under the impression Gossip Girl had higher ratings than that during its popularity phase but I guess not. o.0 I guess it was just good marketing the first few seasons. See CW does know how to market shows XD I wished Hart of Dixie could have or would have done better but so far it just hasn’t . That being said, Rachel is currently filming episodes of Hart on location recently. That is why she has been MIA and not promoting the show much herself. Enews had an interview with her and Scott Porter which seems to have been done in the past week and a half. Before the show came out. I just wonder if all the episodes will air on the CW.o.0 I am doubting it.

  13. 63
    surprised o.0 Says:

    @Kaley: It is called a pre interview. They are always done before any interview. Printed or in front of a camera.To avoid surprise questions. Basic rules of the industry that is what public relations reps are for to prevent those questions. No I wasn’t surprised it was on Rachelonline back to back. I was surprised she would say one thing and do another. I have been one of the few people that still defend her against a lot of the things people say on here. Like her being a hypocrite or calling the press for attention. So I was surprised to actually see something that made her look like a hypocrite. Just because someone is a fan of someone doesn’t mean I can’t question them if I want to. Fans put time and money into the actors and actresses’ careers they follow. So if I want to question Rachel’s behavior I can. just because you are one of the few fans left that think she is perfect, doesn’t mean I have to act like that. Sheesh. You jump on everyone on Rachel threads. The haters and the fans that don’t post a comment that in your opinion is right. Seriously get over yourself.Let people be a fan as they choose to be or even not be a fan of her if they so choose. Is it really going to make such a difference in your life? If it does you have more issues than you want to admit I think.
    Also there have been CW shows with good reviews in the past few years. Such as Vampire Diaries. Unfortunately some of the shows with the best reviews have been canceled. A critic isn’t going to give it a bad review just because its network has a bad rep . A network gets its bad rep because of airing shows with bad reviews. Not the other way around.CW has done everything to promote Hart of Dixie actually. It just isn’t enough I guess.o.0 If the ratings don’t go up in the week several episodes then I guess the ratings speak for themselves and the audience just wasn’t there for it. Which generally means the show just wasn’t good enough to tune in. If a show is great people tune in. Especially after all the promotion Hart has received this year
    .@what an idiot!: o.0 I was always under the impression Gossip Girl had higher ratings than that during its popularity phase but I guess not. o.0 I guess it was just good marketing the first few seasons. See CW does know how to market shows XD I wished Hart of Dixie could have or would have done better but so far it just hasn’t . That being said, Rachel is currently filming episodes of Hart on location recently. That is why she has been MIA and not promoting the show much herself. Enews had an interview with her and Scott Porter which seems to have been done in the past week and a half. Before the show came out. I just wonder if all the episodes will air on the CW.o.0 I am doubting it without gaining more viewers.

  14. 64
    surprised o.0 Says:

    @surprised o.0: Oh it just had to double post. Didn’t it. Haha. Been coming to this site for years and the glitches never fail to amaze me. You would think with all the major advertising they have now. Someone would work on fixing them. ~points to giant REAL STEEL robot dudes on the side~ XD That has to worth a new employee. Come on.

  15. 65
    The Truth Fairy Says:

    http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2011/09/27/tv-ratings-monday-terra-nova-not-out-of-this-world-men-down-still-manly-as-cbs-ratings-stay-high/104964/

    This is unfortunate. One of the reasons that Hart is doomed to failure is the fact that Rachel Bilson lacks the credibility needed to portray a doctor. By her own admission she has great difficulty even understanding the words her boyfriend uses and she never graduated from community college. Why didn’t Schwartz set this show in the world of fashion rather than among the medical fraternity? Rachel Bilson could have held her own in such a portrayal and it might have had more potential for success. She’s the wrong actress for this type of show as she hasn’t the intelligence to shine in a role where the intelligence of the character must be believable.

  16. 66
    jaeger Says:

    @65
    Well she got a dumb/stupid face to begin with – reminding you of a dark & flat-chested version of Chestica Simpleton (Jessica Simpson) LMAOOO but true!!!

  17. 67
    Jack Says:

    @jaeger:
    IDIOT!!

  18. 68
    devaney Says:

    Of course that she’s NOT credible as a doctor… just like as much as she’s NOT likewise credible as an “actress”.

  19. 69
    That Says:

    Kaley, I think you are the one who needs to grow up. Seriously. Hayden should have to shut his eyes so he doesn’t see Rachel kissing some dude in a TV show, which is work? Honey, they’re 30 freaking years old, and have worked in this medium for years. This is WORK. It’s not like she’s talking about him having to watch a CC video of her making out with random guys at some club. Jeeze, so many of you Rachel fans are as dumb as she is. *eyeroll*

    And, Surprised o.0, I agree. Rachel throws Hayden under the bus every chance she gets. Only men with hairy chests are “manly,” when he’s stated numerous times he feels he is lacking in that area. Calling him a “human dictionary” and that she doesn’t understand anything he says. Telling Bonny Hunt that he’s only her BF on the “good days,” and those are few and far between and she’s definitely keeping her options open. Saying he has “chicken legs.” If she’s so far above or beyond being with Hayden that she has to back hand him like this every time she opens her mouth, she needs to move on. Hayden hasn’t done anything to fend any of this off, either personally or professionally, but I feel bad for the guy. Rachel, you just come off as an enormous up your own a^^ b*tch.

  20. 70
    um... Says:

    @ That

    It would appear the Rachel “haters” need to grow up, too, lol! Hayden has hair on his chest, just look at the beach photos of him from April. He must be happy with her, and she with him, or they would both “move on”.

  21. 71
    Peep Says:

    Hayden is stupid. Anyone who would stay in a relationship with someone who sh*t talks them on the regular like Rachel does him is an idiot. He must have no self esteem at all and thinks he only deserves this ***** and what she says about him. I agree, that’s sad. Hayden is a handsome man, he’s smart, and speaks very intelligently. I don’t know why he thinks he needs to stay in this verbally abusive relationship with this self centered woman. When someone is verbally abusive, often it goes further than that. Wouldn’t surprise me, this situation with someone so spoiled and self centered is a breeding ground for that.

  22. 72
    duh Says:

    Well at least that everyone would agree that in the category of being a no-talent-hacks & shiiity careers; they both deserved each other.

  23. 73
    That Says:

    @Um, like I said before you Rachel fans…. Um, yeah. Not the brightest. Like your little fashion icon. If she didn’t mean that as a dig to him, she would never have said what she did about chest hair, given what he’s said before. Not that she has any idea what he’s said about anything. If it doesn’t concern her, she doesn’t care. She said that as a dig to him, it couldn’t be anything else. Just like everything else she says. One minute she doesn’t talk about him, the next she sh(t talks him like the hired help. Which I guess that’s basically what he is at this point, her hired “BF,” just to keep attention on herself at all times. Keep being classy Rachel, yeah.

  24. 74
    KC Says:

    I see the IMDB posters have moved to JJ now! They broke up once and got back together, no one forces them to stay together, guys!

  25. 75
    tweet Says:

    …and I thought, she was just describing Hayden in
    Men’s Health, like hairy chest , big is better, etc., LOL!

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 » Show All

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here