Hugh Grant Welcomes Baby Girl

Hugh Grant Welcomes Baby Girl

Hugh Grant has become a father, his rep tells

“I can confirm that Hugh Grant is the delighted father of a baby girl,” a rep for the actor said in a statement. “He and the mother had a fleeting affair and while this was not planned, Hugh could not be happier or more supportive. He and the mother have discussed everything and are on very friendly terms.”

This is the first child for Hugh, 51, who has not revealed who the mother of the child is.

Congratulations to Hugh!

Like Just Jared on Facebook

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Madonna's 8-year-old son David Banda shows off his amazing dance moves- US Weekly
  • August Alsina has woken up from his three-day coma - TMZ
  • Justin Bieber has the new iPhone 6- Gossip Cop
  • Listen to Pia Mia's new song "Fill Me In"- Just Jared Jr
  • Sam Elliott and Garret Dillahunt has signed on for the last season of Justified- Entertainment Weekly
  • Michael Jackson and Freddie Mercury did a duet together- Huffington Post
  • Watch a new trailer for A Most Violent Year- Lainey Gossip
  • David Ayer could be the director for Suicide Squad?- The Hollywood Reporter
  • Mayra Suarez shows off her amazing bikini body - Hollywood Tuna


Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All
# 1

He and the mother had a fleeting affair and while this was not planned, ______________oKEEEY

# 2

i dont heard anything about this man or he just sleep in uk

# 3

Who the hell crafted this horrid statement?? was it really necessary to say it was a fleeting affair? Why not just that the parents are no longer together? This makes u sound like a playboy and makes the mother of ur newborn child sound like a wh*re. Well done Hugh.

# 4

Wow . look . Its … ehh click ;

# 5

I always wanted to have his babies. Those baby blues….

# 6

He is 51 and doesn’t know about contraception?

# 7

Congratulations, Hugh! You will make a nice dad to that little girl. It was high time, anyway!
Congratulations and enjoy your baby!

# 8

@Carol: Actually, its your perception that says she is a wh*re and Hugh a playboy. Why aren’t you calling him a wh*re?

# 9

Either say nothing or say it all. He said just a tidbit which is enough for the media, esp., British media , to go gungho after the story get info on Changching$$Mommy.

Or he should have just said it all .

Or he should ahve siad nothing.

Now, the girl who trapped him with his approval, can you say set for life.

Very sad for the child…to be product of dumb horny father and money seeking woman.

@Bev: Playboys are wh*res. He is a wh*re, there u go. And that will be my perception yes if u put out statements that it was a ‘fleeting affair’.


Contraception is not a 100 percent effective.

@Carol: My mistake. Thanks for the clarification.

@Dina: Lots of guys have blue eyes. Raise the bar girl.

Why didn’t they just say that the mother is a gold digging stripper and Hugh was really drunk & had a one night stand with her in the back of the strip club & they went through many DNA tests to find out Hugh Grant is now the father of this baby girl!

That would’ve been JUST a tad worse than this release statement from his publicist/rep

Perceptions are just thattoo. It doesn’t mean that they’re facts but that’s what people may think if given x, y or z. So maybe he or she are not wh*res but people will perceive u as such if u say something like that. Poor statement, I agree.

TexasLovin @ 11/01/2011 at 4:52 pm

Is the baby’s name Divine Brown Grant?? Maybe that’s why they aren’t releasing her info

@CJLOVE23: Lolol couldn’t have said it better.

Indignified, completely classless statement.

whatsoever @ 11/01/2011 at 5:01 pm


Couldn’t have said it better

Might as well have tacked on ‘and Hugh is completely happy to pay child support by the way!’.

@Breckin: ‘within reason. They’re working it out. It was just a fleeting affair afterall. Did I mention unplanned? Oh right, I did. Just wanted that on record.’

PreppyJennie @ 11/01/2011 at 5:08 pm

@Dina: LOL Me too , I fell in love with him when I saw the movie ( ironically enough ) Nine Months .

PreppyJennie @ 11/01/2011 at 5:15 pm

While I agree with everyone here about this being a classless statement not publishing the mother’s name spares both Mommy and Baby the pain of being followed around by the paparazzi. In a way he is protecting them from all the media frenzy although at the same time the press will not rest until they find them which is sad .

January Jones did it AGAIN!

@PreppyJennie: No problem with not publishing the name from me, protects privacy. It’s the statement.

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All

Comment and Share!

You have of 5,000 characters left.

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here