Top Stories

Rachel McAdams: 'Sherlock Holmes 2' Premiere!

Rachel McAdams: 'Sherlock Holmes 2' Premiere!

Rachel McAdams glams up the premiere of Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows held at the Regency Village Theatre on Tuesday (December 6) in Westwood, Calif.

The 33-year-old actress paired her Marchesa dress with Christian Louboutin shoes and Jacqueline Nerguizian jewelry.

WATCH: Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows Trailer

Also hitting the black carpet for the premiere: Rachel‘s co-star Robert Downey Jr., who brought along his pregnant wife, Susan, and the film’s director, Guy Ritchie.

20+ pictures inside of Rachel McAdams and Robert Downey Jr. at the Game of Shadows premiere…

Like Just Jared on Facebook
rachel mcadams sherlock 2 premiere 01
rachel mcadams sherlock 2 premiere 02
rachel mcadams sherlock 2 premiere 03
rachel mcadams sherlock 2 premiere 04
rachel mcadams sherlock 2 premiere 05
rachel mcadams sherlock 2 premiere 06
rachel mcadams sherlock 2 premiere 07
rachel mcadams sherlock 2 premiere 08
rachel mcadams sherlock 2 premiere 09
rachel mcadams sherlock 2 premiere 10
rachel mcadams sherlock 2 premiere 11
rachel mcadams sherlock 2 premiere 12
rachel mcadams sherlock 2 premiere 13
rachel mcadams sherlock 2 premiere 14
rachel mcadams sherlock 2 premiere 15
rachel mcadams sherlock 2 premiere 16
rachel mcadams sherlock 2 premiere 17
rachel mcadams sherlock 2 premiere 18
rachel mcadams sherlock 2 premiere 19
rachel mcadams sherlock 2 premiere 20
rachel mcadams sherlock 2 premiere 21
rachel mcadams sherlock 2 premiere 22
rachel mcadams sherlock 2 premiere 23
rachel mcadams sherlock 2 premiere 24

Credit: Jason Merritt, Albert E. Rodriguez; Photos: Getty
Posted to: Guy Ritchie, Pregnant Celebrities, Rachel McAdams, Robert Downey Jr, Susan Downey

JJ Links Around The Web

Kim Kardashian/Instagram

25 Comments

# 1

Oh, c’mon, Noomi Rapace was at the premiere too! There was a photo of them together :) Beautiful talented ladies!

# 2

What about Noomi Rapace and Jude Law? Jared Harris? rachel only did a cameo role here…. Waitting to see the movie.

# 3

wonderful cast!

# 4

She is stunning!!

# 5

I admit …..Rachel is the only reason I’ll see Sherlock Holmes. Though I love Jude Law as well. She looks gorgeous.

# 6

i love her but she looks awful.

# 7
safety marker @ 12/07/2011 at 1:26 am

Lainey Gossip – Article – SHERLOCK HOLMES
Have you seen Sherlock Holmes? And Rachel’s performance? The strength of the film is the chemistry between RDJ and Jude Law. The weakness of the film, aside from an unnecessarily twisty plot, was McAdams. You know I love her. But that role was totally miscast.
Laura and Michelle thought Rachel Weisz would have been an excellent candidate. Sure. But, just to be contrarian, wasn’t the point of that part that she end up forgettable? I mean the way she’s – SPOILER ALERT – dismissed at the end, rather painlessly in fact, implies that Holmes really, after it all, didn’t care much for her. Or perhaps that’s what ended up happening after Guy Ritchie worked with her.
Maybe it’s just me but I get a distinct no-homies vibe between the two of them. In their interviews, there’s some tension. And not the sexual kind.
But now it’s a million different tangents when the only two points I wanted to make in the first place were that: 1. I like her dress but I don’t love her dress it and Diane’s ensemble is better and 2. She was rather disappointing in Sherlock Holmes, agree or disagree?

# 8

safety marker– you are on your 12th moniker and still no one cares about your spamming posts. Find a new hobby.

# 9
safety marker @ 12/07/2011 at 1:37 am

lexy hates bilson @ 01/11/2011 at 6:57 am
Wow! Rachel the Actress being mobbed by REAL fans and not extras her PR people hired.
SHE PAYS EXTRAS TO POSE AS HER FAN BASE

safety marker @ 12/07/2011 at 1:44 am

38
Rachel McAdams is too young to lie about her age—or is she?
The star of Wedding Crashers and The Notebook claims she was born in October 1978, making her 28. But imdb.com puts her birthday in 1976—and those who’ve looked into the matter believe the earlier date may be accurate.
In a November 2005 profile, Details listed McAdams’s age as 29, prompting her then-publicist, Ame Van Iden, to complain vigorously. (McAdams later fired Van Iden, reportedly because the flack booked her to appear nude on Vanity Fair’s cover without her consent.) A Details source says the magazine agreed to run a correction only after Van Iden assured them that IMDb had been notified of its error.
As of yesterday, however, the site was still listing her as 30. When Elle wrote McAdams up for its April cover, it got around the problem by saying, “IMDb states [she] is 30, but [she] is really, truly, ask her mother, 28.”
What’s the truth? “Her birthday is inaccurately reported,” says her rep. “She is 28 years old.” But a source involved with one of her recent films says it’s “no secret among the producers” that she shaves a couple years off her age in interviews—only to add them back on when she’s up for a part that calls for a more “mature” actress.
Wikipedia, for the record, lists her age as 28, but notes that “her exact year of birth is unknown. Some websites list it as 1976 and some websites list it as 1978. This means that she could be between the ages of 28 and 30.”

safety marker @ 12/07/2011 at 1:48 am

Rachel McAdams’s career confuses me. With one exception (last year’s $37 million-grossing State of Play, which was technically a Russell Crowe-Ben Affleck disaster), every wide-release movie she has appeared in since 2004’s Mean Girlshas done well at the North American box office. The Notebook: $81 million. Wedding Crashers: $209 million. Red Eye: $58 million.The Family Stone: $60 million. The Time Traveler’s Wife: $63 million. Sherlock Holmes: $209 million.
(Interesting aside: Lindsay Lohan’s Mean Girls costars, McAdams, Tina Fey and Amanda Seyfried, have all gone on to much bigger and better things than the film’s star.)
The success of exactly half of those films had little to do with her, and The Notebook was a triumph of word of mouth and a strong ensemble cast led by Ryan Gosling, another young actor with an interesting career (a subject for another post). But what would have become of Red Eye and The Time Traveler’s Wife without McAdams? The success of both certainly wasn’t based on the drawing power of her male costars, Cillian Murphy and Eric Bana, respectively.
Still, for all of her commercial success, McAdams is stuck on Hollywood’s B+ list. She’s no Sandra Bullock, no Jennifer Aniston, no Anne Hathaway. She’s beautiful, talented and likable, but there is something a bit generic about her. And unlike, say, Amy Adams, Oscar and Golden Globe nominations haven’t increased her red-carpet visibility. If you were dining in a restaurant, and McAdams walked in, would every head in the room turn in her direction to get a closer look

safety marker @ 12/07/2011 at 1:53 am

Wikipedia Website
BOX OFFICE SUCCESS

RED EYE – RACHEL MCADAMS

Budget $26,000,000
Gross revenue $95,577,774
Directed by Wes Craven
Produced by Chris Bender
Marianne Maddalena
Screenplay by Carl Ellsworth
Story by Carl Ellsworth
Dan Foos
Starring Rachel McAdams
Cillian Murphy
Brian Cox
Jayma Mays
Music by Marco Beltrami

safety marker @ 12/07/2011 at 1:58 am

The Movie Star Next Door

Source: Instyle • Date: October 19, 2010 • Scans

Introduction Rachel McAdams
Rachel McAdams’ Morning Glory had a bit of a disappointing opening week with an estimated $9.2 million. MOVIE STAR NEXT DOOR

She’s so beautiful.

Why is Rachel the only one being featured from this premiere? Noomi has a much, much bigger role, actually most of the cast do. I have to admit, though, the only reason I will even watch this (as I did with the first SH) is JUDE LAW! His Dr. Watson is like a cup of warm hot chocolate on a cold, cold day.

@safety marker: If she was born in 1978, then she’s 33. Wikipedia lists her as 33.

Where’s Jude Law???

Parisienne @ 12/07/2011 at 10:48 am

why Rachel looks so old and tired ?

Nick Naylor @ 12/07/2011 at 12:56 pm

@Parisienne:

Why are you such an idiot?

Wow! She looks amazing!! She gets ‘it’. That you don’t have to look like a hooker to be sexy. I wish more people got that!

disappointed @ 01/02/2012 at 12:51 am

So disappointed… Rachel McAdams was GREAT in the first movie. Why did they leave her out of this one??? It was such a mistake to kill her off at the beginning of the sequel. It would have been so much better with her. She is a beautiful, incredibly talented actress. Too bad they can’t bring her back to life in the 3rd movie.

Man-made ingredients Wig http://synthetic-wigs.dolabuy.com/ Internet their wide range of recognized Man made Unwanted hair Wigs, Very long Fake Wigs, Low-budget Manmade Hair pieces, Small Man made Hairpieces, Extensive Fabricated Wig and also

Howdy would you mind letting me know which web host you’re using? I’ve loaded your blog in 3 different browsers and I must say this blog loads a lot quicker then most. Can you recommend a good hosting provider at a fair price? Cheers, I appreciate it!

FunnyWallPhotos-funny pictures and funny images from around the world. We serve you funny pictures everyday.

Study to write himself, the post from one more supply

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here