Top Stories

Jennifer Aniston & Paul Rudd: 'Wanderlust' Poster!

Jennifer Aniston & Paul Rudd: 'Wanderlust' Poster!

Jennifer Aniston and Paul Rudd get ready to jump in a lake in the poster for their upcoming film Wanderlust.

Here’s the synopsis for the comedy: “George (Rudd) and Linda (Aniston) are an overextended, stressed out Manhattan couple. After George is downsized out of his job, they find themselves with only one option: to move in with George’s awful brother in Atlanta. On the way there, George and Linda stumble upon Elysium, an idyllic community populated by colorful characters who embrace a different way of looking at things. Money? It can’t buy happiness. Careers? Who needs them? Clothes? Only if you want them. Is Elysium the fresh start George and Linda need? Or will the change of perspective cause more problems than it solves?”

WATCH: Wanderlust Trailer

The Judd Apatow-produced flick, which also stars Jen‘s boyfriend, Justin Theroux, and Malin Akerman, is set to hit theaters February 24!

Bigger poster inside

Like Just Jared on Facebook
jennifer aniston paul rudd wanderlust poster

Photos: IMPAwards
Posted to: Jennifer Aniston, Paul Rudd

JJ Links Around The Web

Neilson Barnard/Getty

74 Responses to “Jennifer Aniston & Paul Rudd: 'Wanderlust' Poster!”

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All

  1. 1
    guest Says:

    great marketing ploy — not showing Aniston’s tired out botex face.

  2. 2
    Elle Says:

    Even the producers know Aniston is not a draw for any film.

    They sure are smart not showing her plain, manly face!

    other female celebs on the other hand have their beautiful, feminine faces all over posters because producers know they sell and are a draw.

  3. 3
    crystalgem Says:

    LOL so I’m assuming that goes for Paul Rudd too right?

  4. 4
    ha ha Says:

    This POS will be worst movie ever going by this poster and trailer! That justin squiggy guy is so damn fug and looks like he stinks

  5. 5
    John R. Says:

    Just saw the trailer … and liked it.

  6. 6
    Elle Says:

    @crystalgem:

    Ya, it does.
    Because Paul is average looking as well. Both are fug in the face.

    The movie will flop because neither of these two are able to open a movie on their names alone.

    ie. love Happens, the switch, management, derailed etc. all headlined by Aniston, and all made little money. They may make back their budget, but only b/c no sudio is stupid enough to trust Aniston with a big budget movie w/o a big male star.

  7. 7
    Tommy Boy Says:

    @Elle:

    Love Happens was headlined by Aaron Eckart and Jennifer had a supporting role. Derailed was headlined by Clive Owen. The Switch has Jennifer and Justin Bateman as leads.

    Conversely, Along Came Polly was a huge hit with Jen co-starring opposite Ben Stiller. The Break Up was a huge hit with Jen co-starring opposite Vince Vaugh. Marley and Me was a huge hit with Jen co-starring opposite Owen Wilson.

    Name one film that was a huge success with just Vince Vaughn’s name.
    Name one film that was a huge success with just Owen Wilson’s name.
    Name one film that was a huge success with just Ben Stiller’s name.

  8. 8
    Dd Says:

    @Tommy Boy: Name a movie that Aniston has the lead role that was considered a success.

  9. 9
    Again Says:

    Yet another B-movie.
    anniston neverr carried a movie.
    Marley & Me was a wamr, fuzzy Christmas release and the dog, A DOG, carried the movie.

    Vaughn, Wilson, Stiller, may not have had a huge sucess with one with them as lead, but each of these guys, esp, Stiller, ae bankable.
    I’ll say, yeah, they are one-trick ponies-comics, but you have to admit, Aniston aint’ no Nicole Kidman, Renee Zelleweger, Naoimi Watts, Thandi Newton, Julia Roberts, and the list goes on.

  10. 10
    Carla Says:

    Love Paul Rudd, but this movie just looks boring. Nudie gags are the best writers can do these days? It doesn’t look like much effort was put into this one.

  11. 11
    Media Wh@re MANiston Says:

    Dd @ 12/22/2011 at 10:27 am

    Good One. If this ho is so great, how come she still gets 7-8 mil per picture.

    If Along Came Polly was a hit because of her, shouldn’t she gets 15-20 mil by now. How about Bruce Almighty? Don’t tell me that was a hit because she co-starring with Jim Carrey.

  12. 12
    Tommy Boy Says:

    @Dd:

    Aniston may have never a hit with her name attached but neither has Stiller, Vaughn and Owen Wilson. But it is the COMBINATION of the 2 names, Aniston and Stiller, Aniston and Vaughn and Aniston and Wilson that created the financial success of those films, Same thing with Adam Sandler.

  13. 13
    Tommy Boy Says:

    @Media Wh@re MANiston:

    Aniston now receives 10 Million per film. That was what she was paid for Just Go With It.

  14. 14
    Tommy Boy Says:

    @Media Wh@re MANiston:

    Aniston now receives 10 Million per film. That was what she was paid for Just Go With It.

  15. 15
    Media Wh@re MANiston Says:

    Love the poster. Anything that doesn’t show MAniston’s face is a hit with me.

  16. 16
    Tommy Boy Says:

    @Again:

    When was Renee Zellweger’s last hit film. Her last 5 films all tanked miserable and one of them went straight to DVD. When did Thandie Newton EVER have a film success with her name only? Don’t make me laugh.

  17. 17
    bobjustbob Says:

    The trailer for this movie..yikes, looks like another terrible movie for Jennifer. I wonder if Jennifer A. ever feels embarassed about all the below-mediocre films she has done. Sure some would say she has made $ so who cares, but somehow I think at this point she would like recognitition for a GOOD movie more than $ (she has tons of $)/ She has been in so many blah movies, one after the other (Love Happens, Management, Detrailed, Just Go With It, all awful), there is no way that doesn’t bother her, especially heading towards 50, the window is almost closing for her. Must hurt more when her X and his GF are in award winning stuff). Must be deflating to be in so many bombs. It’s like an entire career built on less than mediocre, in any profession that would be considered bad.

  18. 18
    John R. Says:

    @ Tommy Boy

    You are tilting at windmills. Haters are immune to facts.

  19. 19
    Media Wh@re MANiston Says:

    Wow! Ten millions. She must be the highest paid actresss ever. How long has she been “A SUCCESSFUL” movie actress? And she still gets pay less than 11 mil/picture. How long did it take for Julia, Sandra, Reese, and Cameron to get pay 10 mil?

    So, you are saying that Along Came Polly and The Break-Up wouldn’t have been a hit if it wasn’t MANiston.

    Btw, Marley and Me was a hit because of the dog & the #1 seller book. Not because of Owen or MANiston. Also, speaking of Owen, his movie Midnight in Paris received great reviews & reconigtion. The movie cost 17 mil but made almost 150 mil.

  20. 20
    Shaila Says:

    Can’t wait to see it, love Jen and Paul. Movie looks like fun.

  21. 21
    Justin Wants a FrontlaceWig Says:

    Thank God they didn’t show her ugly 47yoa botoxed face another Crappy movie for the Laughing Stock of Hollywood!!

  22. 22
    mwannir Says:

    http://www.dshini.net/de/spage/dd7f9981-143d-b8a4-017e-6124dfa94912

  23. 23
    brendaj Says:

    Why are they not showing their faces.

    surprised they even put Paul’s name on the poster. The way the early promotion was going one would think Justin was the co-star and not Paul.

    I think it will or may make money. but I won’t be seeing it.

    That poster is terrible.

  24. 24
    Anistdon't Says:

    good timing. Release this crap of a meaningless tripe among Oscar & award contenders that have real meaning & beauty.

    OMG..she is so done…stick a fork in her!
    playing in same ole same ole low IQ, unfunny films a desperate 43 yr old trying to look 15 yrs younger.

    Leprechaun was her best moment in film history.

  25. 25
    Ginger Says:

    @Shaila:

    and what do you love so much about them? pff bwhahaha
    real Ace’s to admire, huh? LMAO

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here