Top Stories

'Hunger Games: Mockingjay' Officially Split Into Two Films

'Hunger Games: Mockingjay' Officially Split Into Two Films

The Hunger Games: Mockingjay has officially been split into two separate films with release dates one year apart from each other.

Part 1 of the film will hit theaters on November 21, 2014 while Part 2 while be released on November 20, 2015.

The Hunger Games, which stars Jennifer Lawrence, Josh Hutcherson, and Liam Hemsworth, was released last March and grossed over $404 million at the domestic box office and over $678 million total worldwide. The DVD hits stores on August 18.

The Hunger Games: Catching Fire, which will soon start production, is expected to be released on November 22, 2013.

ARE YOU EXCITED to see The Hunger Games: Mockingjay in two parts?

Like Just Jared on Facebook
Posted to: Hunger Games

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Jared Leto's glorious hair evolution- US Weekly
  • Guess who this little Santa Claus turned into- TMZ
  • Ariana Grande reveals she's repulsed by Santa Claus- Gossip Cop
  • Sweet Suspense and Jordan Fisher drop "Santa Claus Is Coming To Town" after JJJ takeover- Just Jared Jr
  • Exodus banned in Egypt due to historical mistakes- Entertainment Weekly
  • Eight movie scores we'll still listen to in 2015 - Huffington Post
  • Prince Harry's hot Christmas exercise- Lainey Gossip
  • North Korea calls President Barack Obama a monkey- The Hollywood Reporter

43 Responses to “'Hunger Games: Mockingjay' Officially Split Into Two Films”

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

  1. 1
    lorelai Says:

    This is so stupid. The third book was the most boring and they want to drag it out into two movies?

  2. 2
    lorelai Says:


  3. 3
    cam Says:

    Harry Potter did it better.

  4. 4
    jen_block Says:

    I like HG but this is soooo not needed. The third book sucked.

  5. 5
    tim Says:

    actually its a great oportunite to develop the book. there were so many missing points in there.

  6. 6
    Sam Says:

    Why so far apart? Do what Potter did and have in autumn and summer.
    I’ll be in my 20s before it’s over.

  7. 7
    Thomas Says:

    Uuummm..NO! Please stop trying to make this two-part thing work..Potter was the only one that nailed it because it had two different plots and was clearly shown with the two movies..But Tw and HG!? You’ve gotta be freaking kidding me!!!!!

  8. 8
    nathy Says:

    expected! why make 700millions dollar whe you can double that with 2 movies…

  9. 9
    sadie Says:

    @tim: you mean a great opportunity for greedy studios to make cash?

  10. 10
    true Says:

    omg they can’t be serious. “Mockingjay” is not just boring, it’s a ****, the worst book I ever read.

  11. 11
    Gabby Says:

    This is getting old now. It was a big deal when Potter did it, but now all the other studios are clearly using it as a ploy to get more money. It was unnecessary with Twilight and even though it’s a wonderful book…it’s unnecessary with The Hobbit. To be fair to the Hunger Games, splitting the last book may actually work in its favor, because the last book was so rushed. The author tried to cram so much in that there didn’t seem like there was enough time for the plot to really develop. So, splitting Mockingjay may actually be a good idea.

  12. 12
    mackenzie Says:

    @Thomas: HP nailed it and I think it was a good idea for Twilight too. It would have been too rushed to have the wedding/honeymoon, the birth, bella’s transformation, the child growing, and the volturi attack all in one movie. Both HP and BD were very long books, while Mockingjay is short.

  13. 13
    chris Says:

    What? That’s ridiculous! I’ve read the book and has no the extension as the “Deathly Hallows” or “Breaking Dawn” for making 2 films …. This decision is totally commercial decision

  14. 14
    nonya Says:

    why are all these movies copying harry potter?!?!

  15. 15
    Uhmm Says:

    Ugh. I like THG, but is every movie like that just doing it like HP? Way to do it JUST. FOR MONEY.

  16. 16
    Lisa Says:

    I’ll be 24 when Mockingjay part 2 comes out. I’ll be freaking old! No, but seriously, as a huge, huge fan of the books, and as much as I want to see Josh and Jen doing interviews and movies together until the end of time, I believe this is kind of unnecessary. We’ll be seeing a lot of the Capitol torture and a lot of hijacking in these movies, that much I can tell you.

  17. 17
    Gabby Says:


    Because both parts of the last Potter film made a TON of money…double the amount it would have made if they had gone with one film. So, of course…that’ why…it’s all about money.

  18. 18
    Kaylee Says:

    I am so over the ‘splitting one book into two movies’ thing. it just reeks of money making not movie making. it ruins the momentum of the book by being split into two parts a year apart.

    only time i dont care is The Hobbit. more hobbit is always great

  19. 19
    Scarlett Says:

    Really? This is only the second movie. It works with HP and Twilight because. They were the last movie in series and you could cutting it i half and make two completely different movies. (( Not completely but they could stand alone))

    I gonna be like 25 before this series is over. :/

  20. 20
    Rose Says:

    @Lisa: @Scarlett: OMG! all these stupid saying how many years they will have when the film finished. And by the way, Scarlett, you’re already an adult.

  21. 21
    Sun Says:

    @mackenzie: Shut up

  22. 22
    Sun Says:

    @chris: BD don’t needed 2 movies. They do it for cash.

  23. 23
    Sun Says:

    @Rose: BRAVO! They’re Twilight fans. Their brains doesn’t work

  24. 24
    HpandTwilightFan Says:

    for the twilight and hp fans the books needed to be cut into two as there was so much in the books that by doing one they would have cut out bits that were needed adn would have made a lot of fans angery.

  25. 25
    Scarlett Says:

    Oh really i wouldn’t have guessed.

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here