Top Stories

Katie Holmes: Off-Broadway Matinee with Jeremy Strong!

Katie Holmes: Off-Broadway Matinee with Jeremy Strong!

Katie Holmes smiles at British actor Jeremy Strong as the two head to see the off-Broadway play If There Is I Haven’t Found It Yet together on Saturday (September 1) in New York City.

The 33-year-old actress co-starred with Jeremy in the 2010 flick The Romantics.

PHOTOS: Check out the latest pics of Katie Holmes

After the show, which stars Jake Gyllenhaal, the duo reportedly grabbed coffee and strolled around the neighborhood.

Meanwhile, Katie is rumored to be the first ever face of Bobbi Brown Cosmetics, according to reports. So exciting!

FYI: Katie is wearing Bloch’s ‘Jenna’ flats.

Like Just Jared on Facebook
katie holmes broadway play jeremy strong 01
katie holmes broadway play jeremy strong 02
katie holmes broadway play jeremy strong 03
katie holmes broadway play jeremy strong 04
katie holmes broadway play jeremy strong 05

JJ Links Around The Web

Charley Gallay/Getty

21 Comments

# 1

The less Katie, the better

# 2

Good for her.

# 3

At least she ditched the BFH (Boots from Hell).

# 4

If that’s a date, neither one of them is trying very hard – they both look pretty schlumpy.

# 5

OMG, cover those fat gross legs. You look like a refugee!!!!

# 6

She has the worst taste in clothes. My grandma dresses better than her.

# 7

I seemed to remember when she first married Tom she wanted to crack Broadway, but didn’t get very far. Let’s see how she goes this time, now that she’s ditched Tommy Girl and has a tiny bit of credibilty under her belt.

# 8

Elephant Legs Alert ! ! !

# 9

@ Mimi and Louna

Let me guess you are talking about yourselves I take it? Stop projecting your own insecurities onto others.

If she has ‘fat’ legs then I must be the same too. Give me a break!

Not a fan of TC and never hated on Katie, but dear lord, I’m so sick of seeing her. She needs to take Suri and disappear for a few years.

Pretty Ka @ 09/05/2012 at 5:45 pm

I really don’t think this is a date; seems more like hanging out with a guy friend (something she probably wasn’t ‘allowed’ to do back when she was married). She seems happy :)

For someone who has a pricey “high-end” fashion line, lord does she look a mess. This whole outfit is so totally unattractive on her I wouldn’t even know where to begin to try and fix it so she looks good. She should go home, start over, consult Suri and put on something that flatters and minimizes her figure flaws. Instead with all of her money, contacts and modeling she throws on this???

She’s such a slob.

Just sayin' @ 09/05/2012 at 7:30 pm

Well, atleast she ditched that loser Tom Cruise. I think we all know now that he set Katie up. After reading that vanity fair article, it looks like Katie got herself and Suri away from that controlling, nasty freak and his cult just in time. Good on ya Katie. You’re a good Mom to have saved your little girl from scientology and Tom Cruise.

According to Vanity Fair, the prenup her father brokered filled five banker’s boxes. This whole marriage / divorce was orchestrated right from the start. That’s why it was settled so quickly. The only surprise for Tom was the timing and the fact that she filed in NY. If she was set up by Cruise, she was a willing victim and profited financially. Her father saw to it.

@Whale:

THANK YOU, Whale! I was thinking the same thing. If her skin was stretched over her bones, maybe Louna and Mimi would be happy. Katie’s legs are far from fat. i swear, I don’t understand the obsession of some cultures with the near-death, bony look. There’s nothing remotely beautiful about that.

Go, Katie! It’s nice to see her happy :)

Her show was a box office hit, #7.

Don’t be an idiot, #11.

Don’t believe everything you read, #14.

How was the filing a surprise if the divorce was orchestrated in the first place, #15.

Glad to see her relaxing and enjoying herself instead of trying to live the life that Tom wanted her to live. She seems more at peace with herself and happy. Tom tried to make her into something that she wasn’t.

@Hamlet:

Seriously Hamlet, how many “sources” will it take to convince you that the cult is evil and they did orchestrate Tom and his romance AND that they declared Kidman a suppressive. Over a half-dozen high ranking defectors who were in a place and time to know have come forward confirming the stories. Among them Rathbun, Haggis and a former female member. It is going to be hard for Kidman and Nazanin Boniadi to confirm the stories since no doubt both of them signed iron-clad non-disclosure agreements. You now his nannies have to sign one and that includes not telling anyone who you work for. You are either a cult member or else a deluded stalker type fan. All of these people confirming the article are well respected journalists/Hollywood types. The only ones saying the VF article is not true is Tom and his minions and the Cult. Which of course they are going to do. Do you really think Tommy wants it known out in public that he auditioned girlfriends? That he encouraged Bella and Connor to shun their mother? Do you?

Even tho she keeps the clothes line functioning, she seems to have accepted the fact that she is not a model, she is not Jackie O, nor one of those sophistiacted ladies or wannabes that are always impeccably attired and coiffed.
She tried to be, at the early stages of her marriage, she dressed weirdly, wore heels. for a lot of occasions with disastrous results (she even fell on fron of paps), etc. Sometime along these years she must have realized what a lie she ended up living in. She blinded herself, but she could remedy this. And took action.

Child Please @ 09/06/2012 at 7:35 am

Jeremy ******* is not British, he’s the mayor of Munchkinland. And, as we can see from these photos, he’s also (A) a committed, industrious and talented climber, and (B) a Brontosaurus. Don’t mess with Tom’s ex-wife, horseneck.

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here