Top Stories

Leonardo DiCaprio: TAG Heuer Event with Cameron Diaz!

Leonardo DiCaprio: TAG Heuer Event with Cameron Diaz!

It’s a Gangs of New York reunion!

Leonardo DiCaprio makes his first appearance since his split with girlfriend Erin Heatherton at an event for TAG Heuer on Saturday evening (November 10) in New York City.

The 37-year-old actor helped his former co-star Cameron Diaz celebrate the launch of her limited edition signed watch at the event which raised money for the UN Women and New York Cares’ Hurricane Sandy relief effort.

Leo‘s split from Erin was announced last week, just days before she walked in the Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show.

FYI: Cameron is wearing SLANE bangle bracelets.

Just Jared on Facebook
leonardo dicaprio tag heuer event with cameron diaz 01
leonardo dicaprio tag heuer event with cameron diaz 02
leonardo dicaprio tag heuer event with cameron diaz 03
leonardo dicaprio tag heuer event with cameron diaz 04
leonardo dicaprio tag heuer event with cameron diaz 05

Photos: Rob Loud/Getty
Posted to: Cameron Diaz, Leonardo DiCaprio

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Usher goes shirtless while on vacation in Mexico - TMZ
  • Casey Affleck and his girlfriend are not getting married - Gossip Cop
  • Emma Roberts has started a book club - Just Jared Jr
  • Is DWTS pro Sharna Burgoss dating her partner Bonner Bolton? - Wetpaint
  • Lindsay Lohan is pitching a new social media hacking reality show - Lainey Gossip
  • The Eiffel Tower is going dark to honor London terrorist attack victims - The Hollywood Reporter
  • @wolf

    @wolf: you’re right, I think it would be better for her if she’s not in a relationship with him

  • WoWS

    Margot fans, please point us in the direction of where we can see her talent. Pan-Am definitely wasn’t it. She looked the part, she’s well connected with the Aussie contingent and Scorsese isn’t that picky when it comes to casting blonde bombshells. It won’t be the first time he’s cast a mediocre actress as the love interest. Sometimes it works out. Cathy Moriarty was great in Raging Bull. Sometimes it doesn’t. Cameron Diaz was not up to the task in Gangs of New York. Thankfully Margot’s role in Wolf is not as demanding or central to the story as Cam’s was in Gangs.

    What does it matter if Margot and Leo are sexing it up? I don’t believe they are, but they’re both adults, single, and the movie will benefit from the extra ‘Are they or aren’t they?’ publicity.

  • Yeah!

    @102: Great points! Margot and her being cast for this movie. That was my first reaction when I heard the casting info and after watching a couple of episodes of PanAm. This has to be her looks. You said it right she looked the part in PanAm and I think that `s what landed her the role in WOWS not her talent. Cute girl but not an outstanding actress.
    Sure a rumor doesn`t hurt the movie ( and sorry to say but her blossoming career ) just like with Kate Winslet. But I highly doubt Leo would promote this movie with his co-star being his girlfriend or ex girlfriend.

  • tinkerbell

    @: ): well she didnt.

  • tinkerbell

    @: ): what you don’t like is I have a long memory and I’m often right. There is nothing terrible about it. Sorry charlie.

    goo goo ga ga! baby poop mindless laudatory drivel

    (are you happy now?That is what you want right)

  • : )

    all right, be bitter and angry for the rest of your life

  • Downunder

    @WoWS: Margot spent a number of years on a soap we have down here called Neighbours- I doubt shes a struggling actress cause the “kid” on Neighbours and Home and away make between 5000-7000 per week plus depending on how central those characters are- so if she was smart about it she’ll have her own money. Shes also got a skeaky clean rep down here- Usually “kids” of those shows are one of 2 ways- either drunk/high falling out of clubs/casinos or squeaky clean girl/boy next door types. Margot is the latter- only time you read anything about her was if she was flipping burgers for McHappy Day or Planet Ark adverts- charity basically. Australian Designers also loved dressing her for logies and stuff. And- whilst friendly and bubley in interviews, she also not backward and coming forwards she will call someone on their sh@t- At least she did when she was still down here….
    I think, like most people here, LD should give the 20 somethings a break. However, if thats the path he taking in this case he could do a hell of a lot worse than Margot- last 3 girls case in point (Shrug JMO)
    Margot also lives in New York- has done since she left neighbours (2-3yrs ago I think) so they’er not flying in and out of Australia.
    My guess if this is correct (them dating I mean) that like Lively their waiting for something- in this case maybe WOWS to finish filming so they’re no longer co-stars or something?? Just a guess??

  • Downunder

    sorry brain fart- that should read squeaky clean rep- not skeaky!

  • Here we go

    @Downunder: Somebody please explain to me why your comment got the thumbs down? is it maybe because there is something to like about her?? I loved her on Neighbours by the way!

  • Yeah!

    @downunder: The question was about her talent and not how much she makes or about her reputation. There are people in soap operas and in movies who can’t act to save their lives yet they make money.
    Her work in PanAm didn’t show talent at all.

  • sarah

    @Yeah – I don’t know Leo personally, but I doubt his choice of girlfriends is be based on her talents as an actress.
    I think he is more attracted by her looks, and mostly her personality. Margot seems like a simple, not complicated joyful and lively person. I am sure she doesn’t pretend to be an A list actress. She must feel very flattered and honored though to be in a Scorsese movie working next to Leo.And if they get along fine and he invites her to parties to mingle with his close friends it probably only means he likes her for who she is.
    it is way too early to determine if there is anything serious between the two. except that they seem to like each other’s company.
    But she is definitely cute, for sure….. and not boring.

  • Yeah!

    @111: It`s not about how Leo picks his girlfriends. If you read #102 you will see that the question is about Margot`s talent and it has nothing to do with Leo. It`s about the fact that this girl has a soap opera in Australia and a failed TV show in the US under her acting belt and then she is a Scorsese movie. It`s not personal since I don`t know her at all and I don`t think there is an affair with Leo. It`s only about her work as an actress. I agree with #102 that it has to do something with her looks rather than her acting.
    Leo seems to get along with his co-stars in general and it doesn`t seem to be any different with Margot.

  • Weirdo

    I’m surprised no one has mentioned that the aussie tabs are saying Margot and Leo were seen “locking lips” at the birthday party on Saturday. I feel sorry if this is a case of another unsuspecting blonde being preyed upon by Leo, but I’m partly hoping it is true so we can see Yeah lose her cool, lol.
    I would post the text but I’m on the road. It was on a site called (?) In australia.

  • Yeah!

    Why would I lose my cool? I think I said that even if there’s something casual going on it won’t go public. By casual I meant an affair with kissing and having sex so an alleged kiss would make me lose my cool? That makes sense. LOL I don’t think it’s necessary to post the article since its exactly the same as the one from People except for the kiss.

  • lol

    Well I’m giving her acting skills benefit of the doubt, because she wasn’t good on pan am, but she may be a decent actress in the right role. sharone stone was an awful actress, yet she was perfect in scorsese’s movie. same with cameron in gangs of new york..she is a pretty mediocre actress, but at least proved she could hold her own in a scorsese movie. so you can’t judge margot on just her past performances.

    Not saying there is anything going on between them, its too soon to tell, but I highly doubt. leo starting relationship with a costar doesn’t sound like him.

  • wolf

    see what I mean. the bashing begins lol her acting on pan-am is irrelevant to her acting in wows. All actors have to start somewhere. Michelle Williams was less hyped than Katie Holmes when they were on Dawson’s Creek and look at who ended up having the better career. Working with a good director can do wonders for an actor. Like the above post mentioned, Sharon Stone got an oscar nom for Casino.. the same Sharon that gets more razzies than oscar noms lol I’m not even a fan of margot, but it annoys me how every girl that gets linked to leo gets bashed on this site. stop being so immature.

  • lol

    @116 agreed, hopefully there won’t be too much bashing of margot (once again i still don’t think their dating) I think she’s quite beautiful, but too young. but I agree, you all can’t judge margots acting skills yet. She’s only got small, minor roles under her belt, so you don’t really know what kind of actress she is just by seeing those little roles…she might be great, scorseses best female lead..while I doubt that is true, loll, but she shouldn’t be knocked because her past role was not the best. Scorsese doesn’t hire people who aren’t at least good in his movies role.

  • Yeah!

    @wolf: How is this bashing? Nobody attacked her personally and having an opinion on her acting based on what I have actually seen is not bashing. She wasn`t good on PanAm and I really don`t see how is it bashing. If anything you sound like you are waiting for that to start…
    Also her not being good on PanAm is irrelevant to her acting on WOWS? Sorry but I don`t see the point in that. Her acting on PanAm showed her acting skills that she is using now on WOWS. Hopefully she is going to be ( much ) better… I don`t think Cameron Diaz or Michelle Williams were great in their roles in Scorsese movies. Cam is a rom-com actress so she was kind of out of her element. It was OK. I`m not very familiar with Michelle Williams` work in general but I didn`t like her in Shutter Island at all. But both had more experience before being cast than Margot. I loved the female actresses in The Departed and The Aviator. All of them did an excellent job.

  • Yeah!

    For the record I had the exact same opinion about Margot being cast in WOWS when I heard the news that she got the role months ago. It wasn`t bashing back then and I really don`t believe qualifies as bashing now…

  • lol

    @yeah but its not fair to judge margot on just pan am alone, how an actor performs also has to do with good writing, story lines, and directors. PanAm had weak story plots and writing. that doesn’t mean margot is a terrible actress. i’m not praising her either, but its unfair to judge on one performance of hers alone, when really thats the only margot performance you can reference to.

  • Yeah!

    @lol: What else is there to judge her acting if you don`t live in Australia? You can be good in a weak story. Christina Ricci was actually quite entertaining in that show in spite of the story line.
    The point in #102&103 was that it`s surprising she was cast in WOWS because she hasn`t shown much talent so far. Rather looks. Hopefully she is going to step up her game and show the world that she is more than just a pretty face. She looked the role and she will have to prove she is more than that. But I don`t think it`s bashing to be skeptical about her in this movie based on her resume.

  • Yeah!

    Also I was also surprised to see Matthew McConaughey in the movie but he was good in The Lincoln Lawyer. He showed his potential in that movie so I curious to see how he is going to do in WOWS. Also another TV actor ( Friday Night Lights ) and a Broadway actress. Seems like kind of a random group of actors Scorsese collected for this movie. I`m really curious to see how is it going to come together.

  • lol

    @yeah its okay to be skeptical about her acting, but all I say is why not give her a change. I trust martin scorsese and his choices have never disappointed, so I’m just saying maybe theres more acting skill there than what we saw on PanAm :)

  • Yeah!

    @123: Let`s hope so. I wasn`t always crazy about Scorsese`s casting as I mentioned before ( Diaz and Williams ) so I remain skeptical.

  • tinkerbell

    @Here we go: because someone is jealous….that is why…..

  • Downunder

    @Yeah!: She won a best new talent Logie when she was on Neighbours- Logies are our emmies- does that answer your question????

  • Yeah!

    @126: That`s it? A … Logie? Let`s see how she does in WOWS.

  • @126

    You don’t owe anyone an explanation of her talents. If he wants to date her he will, and the fan that hates will simply transfer her rage to the new one and deal as always.

  • Yeah!

    @128: Too bad that this whole conversation has absolutely nothing to do with Leo. I said the exact same thing about Margot months ago when Leo was dating Erin. But who cares, right? :eyeroll:

  • @Downunder


    Thanks for the info. She sounds like way too good a person for him. If he wants her, I hope for her sake she runs the other way.

  • ???

    @@Downunder: I didn’t see Pan Am but I loved her as Donna, she’s a baby actress, give her a break everyone, but can you see her as Leo’s latest chickie? I just can’t.

  • LeoScar!?
  • @132

    Another rumor was pretty predictable.

  • tinkerbell

    Yeah we all predicted Scar Jo for a fling, at least she wont stick. There isnt much else around for him. They are all “too old” or married or have a kid or too smart or recently adopted or dating someone…

  • Weirdo

    Don’t worry, the posts against Margot have nothing to do with anything except raging hostility towards any woman that even so much as looks at Leo.
    So what? She’s an OK actress that got cast in a big film because she also looks the part. Wouldn’t be the first time this happened. I have to give Marty some credit though, she has to be somewhat of a decent actress to get the part. We won’t know until the film comes out. Her role is not done in isolation, it will also depend on the support of her by the rest of the cast. If she’s working with Leo, she will come out looking pretty good.

  • longines flagship

    I first got the rose gold and then a month later bought the gold. Both are fabulous and so fashionable. The rose gold is a beautiful color. Not too flashy. It received so MANY complements. Worth every penny.}I really wanted a boyfriend watch so I found this one on luxurywristwatchs with extremely high reviews. I can see why! It’s perfect and works great!got this for my boyfriend….he absolutly loves this watch. He wears it with everything but his gym clothes and it looks great on him. No adjustment issues, fits perfect!I have this watch for 4 months now, keeps good time. Have been complimented on many occasions on its looks.Changed the band after a while, as the original band was crap. Would recommend it.thanks a lot for a great deal, i am so happy with these, so fast so good attention, big deal for meGreat watch with an old world feel. it was better than I thought it would be. I love this watch, almost to the point I don’t want to wear it so it will stay in perfect condition

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here