Top Stories

Sienna Miller: Tom Sturridge's 'Orphans' Begins Previews Tomorrow!

Sienna Miller: Tom Sturridge's 'Orphans' Begins Previews Tomorrow!

Sienna Miller carries her baby girl Marlowe out of her local Duane Reade after picking up a few essentials on Friday (March 22) in New York City.

The 31-year-old actress bundled up her eight-month-old daughter in a big puffy white coat for the chilly Big Apple weather.

Sienna‘s fiance Tom Sturridge‘s Broadway play Orphans is set to begin previews this coming Tuesday (March 26). The play, which also stars Alec Baldwin and Ben Foster, will officially open on April 18.

Grab your tickets if you will be in the area!

FYI: Sienna is wearing an Ann Taylor coat.

Like Just Jared on Facebook
sienna miller tom sturridges orphans begins previews march 26 01
sienna miller tom sturridges orphans begins previews march 26 02
sienna miller tom sturridges orphans begins previews march 26 03
sienna miller tom sturridges orphans begins previews march 26 04

JJ Links Around The Web

Michael Buckner/Getty

11 Responses to “Sienna Miller: Tom Sturridge's 'Orphans' Begins Previews Tomorrow!”

  1. 1
    Tienda online ropa Says:

    Love you Sienna!

  2. 2
    AnnmarieZ Says:

    How come her babies face is blurred out? I think that is a good thing but no one elses kids faces are blurred out?

  3. 3
    Lucy Says:

    Is anybody knows why her baby’s face is covered? I think it’s a great idea, and in Europe is mandatory, but in the USA not and I am wondering why actually this family. Is that because of Tom’s nationality? He’s British, but not one and only, so what is going on? Whether you could legally provide it?

  4. 4
    Lucy Says:

    Furthermore, I remeber that Aaron Johnson’s babies face at the beginning were also covered, but now they’re not. Why?

  5. 5
    Allie Says:

    So are we just blurring this baby’s face? I was just on a post with the Afflecks and all of their children’s faces were visible. I’m confused.

  6. 6
    Mkia Says:

    Cute baby ;D

  7. 7
    Josephine Says:

    It’s probably because Sienna specifically requested blurring Marlowe’s face and threatened that she will go to court. She already won a case against tabloids so she has an advantage in this fight against privacy violations. I remember reading somewhere that every celebrity can technically do that but they are afraid because of the possibility of revenge from the media outlets. Agencies will blur the child’s face but instead paparazzi might harass them even harder so it is not exctly a win. It is a question of what is worse – pictures being published or paparazzi stalking celebrities and their children every single day, screaming, shouting and provoking them to do something worth publishing despite the fact that child’s face has to be covered. Normally they don’t have to do that because even the long lens pictures of children bring them money.

  8. 8
    Constance Says:

    I’ve seen pictures of this child on other websites. So, I’m not sure why her face is blurred here. Marlowe’s a cute kid. I didn’t even think Sienna was famous enough to warrant all of this.

  9. 9
    Mel Says:

    Kuddos to her for making tabloids blur her little girl’s face. I wish other actors could do the same

  10. 10
    OK Says:

    If the pics were purchased from a UK agency, then the kid’s face will be blurred by the laws in that country.

  11. 11
    BO Says:

    jeez does she wear anything but fur:? disgusting

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here