Top Stories

Kate Bosworth: 'And While We Were Here' Trailer!

Kate Bosworth: 'And While We Were Here' Trailer!

Kate Bosworth goes in for the kiss with Jamie Blackley in this new still from their movie And While We Were Here.

The 30-year-old actress plays a woman who finds love with a younger man (Blackley) while on vacation with her husband (Iddo Goldberg) in Italy.

The film, directed by Kat Coiro, premiered last year at the Tribeca Film Festival and was presented in black and white, but when it is released this month, it will be seen in color.

And While We Were Here will be released on iTunes and VOD on August 13 and in theaters on September 13.

Pictured inside: Kate running errands in a multi-colored dress on Wednesday (August 7) in Los Angeles.

“And While We Were Here” Trailer
Just Jared on Facebook
kate bosworth and while we were here trailer 01
kate bosworth and while we were here trailer 02
kate bosworth and while we were here trailer 03
kate bosworth and while we were here trailer 04
kate bosworth and while we were here trailer 05

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Find out what Alicia Keys got her husband Swizz Beatz for his 40th birthday! - TMZ
  • Camila Cabello once went to the hospital for this crazy reason - Just Jared Jr
  • Ashley Graham is throwing some shade at Kendall Jenner - TooFab
  • This actress is getting rave reviews for her latest movie role - Lainey Gossip
  • Listen to Cher Lloyd's new song - Just Jared Jr
  • Katy Perry and Orlando Bloom are still going strong - Gossip Cop
  • ladybug

    Wow, “running errands in a multicolored dress.” How newsworthy.

    Not her best side:

  • TheMuffinMan

    Movie looks boring

  • Twat!

    She really has no business being linked to this movie. Yes she’s in it, but she done absolutely nothing to help promote it. She’s useless as always.

  • LooseLipz

    She looks like Daryl Hannah here….
    Not fond of this chick….

  • Macy

    It does look boring, and she looks way too skinny.

  • DailyNightly

    Not a fan of Kate’s but I have to say this does not look bad. she actually looks a bit like Kate Winslet in some of those shots. Maybe her film work is improving?

  • Rachel

    I gonna watch this. The young guy in this movie looks super cute.

  • To be or not to be

    its a trailer they always show the good parts but the fact is she can’t act never could so I wouldn’t hold my breath on this being anything more than horny teen and lonely housewife even in the trailer she is still just one expression so imagine the entire movie just like the rest of her work no one really cares.

  • Madge

    This Jamie is really cute :) I’ll watch it.

  • Whycantipost

    Insert cheesy story about lost love: ‘booohoo she is already married’.
    Add ‘exotic’ / ‘romantic’ location: Usually France (especially Paris) or Italy (especially Venice).
    Show a lot of area shots, while using yellow light: ‘OMGGG it’s soooo romantic, picturesque here’

    And we have another romantic movie everyone will forget.


    The beginning did make me lol though, reminded me of the interview KB did and she tried to pretend to speak French. The Italian is just as hilarious. I wonder how many ‘I speak Italian now’ interviews we get.

  • ladybug

    @DailyNightly: Her film work probably isn’t improving. This was filmed two years ago, and shown at Tribeca over year ago. Doesn’t bode well for the overall quality of the movie that it’s taken this long to even get to VOD. The scenery is nice though.
    @Whycantipost: “I wonder how many ‘I speak Italian now’ interviews we get.” We probably would if she were to do anything to promote it. Which she hasn’t.

  • Tulip
  • Tulip

    I wish the film was showing in B&W but I still want to see it.

  • Tulip

    I meant to include this in my post #12:

    I think the current average grade for the film is a B.

  • ladybug

    @Tulip: Wow. Two reviews that liked it.
    And yet, it still took over a year from Tribeca to make it to VOD and theaters. IMBD has it at 6.3. averaged from 57 votes.

    Even with what for her are decent reviews, she’s still had only two acting jobs since she finished this movie and it showed at Tribeca.

    Watch it, enjoy it. But the reality is, if she were really that good of an actress she’d be getting more roles.

  • British Latin American

    Funny, both the love interests are from the UK (although Goldberg is also Israeli) yet the Blackley character, who has the rooting value, has an American or at least neutral accent, but Goldberg has an English accent, and we are not supposed to root for him. American bias much?

  • Suze

    Why isn’t she promoting this? She has a cover in a magazine & talks about everything but this movie. I don’t get it.

  • Backstabbing

    She’s not promoting it because she had a fall out with Kat Coiro.
    They claimed to be beasties at Sundance a few years ago, supposedly got the idea for this film there and went to Italy to film it. Something went down. It wouldn’t surprise me if her relationship with MP had something to do with it. He was there in Italy with them, by the way. That was confirmed by someone who was on the flight back with them giving KB and MP a shout out on Facebook. Pretty pathetic considering she was still technically in a relationship with Alex at the time. I wouldn’t be surprised if KB and MP were trying to take more credit for the film than what was deserved. KB’s name was removed as a producer from the film. She didn’t go to Tribeca or any other Film festival to help promote it. She was also not pictured with Kat at the Premiere of Life Happens, the other film they did together. It’s only a matter of time before KB and MP wear out their welcome in any circle in HW. The whole “we’ve only been apart for 3 day in our whole relationship” crap that KB spewed in her latest article is down right creepy and them only working as a team is really twisted. it won’t be long before serious people in HW get sick of playing along and just start laughing over what a joke the two of them are.

  • Suze

    @Backstabbing: I remember her not being there & finding it odd. She never misses an opportunity to be seen. I don’t know, even if they did have a falling out, she’s the lead & should be a professional & promote it.

  • ladybug

    @Backstabbing: I don’t think it was Sundance that they met, it was Straw Dogs, KC’s married to Rhys Coiro, an actor in the film.
    I think serious people in HW are already tired of playing along. MP might get more indie films to do, but as for her, she’s pretty and not the worst actress ever, but HW is filled with young, pretty and talented actresses. She has nothing to sell herself as an actress except that she’s a ‘fashion icon’.

    @Suze: She’s promoted Lake Bell’s movie more than she’s promoted her own. On one hand, Lake’s got an award at Sundance, and AWWH isn’t an award winning festival favorite, but still, it’s the movie you starred in. Just because something happened between you and the writer/director/former friend doesn’t mean you should at least tweet about it.

  • Backstabbing


    I know that they met through SD and that Rhys was in the movie. I was just mentioning all those stupid interviews she was giving with Kat by her side talking about how there were no good roles for women and that she and Kat were working on a film that they conjured up while at Vail film festival actually the day before. I thought it was at Sundance.

  • ladybug

    @Backstabbing: OK, now in re-reading it I see what you mean.
    I don’t think it was Sundance, because I’m not finding anything to say that KC’s been to Sundance, though KB has. I think it must have been Vail only. Though they premiered L!fe Happens at the LA film fest a couple months after this, and they were still BFF at that time, so they could have been talking about it then.
    as for AWWWH:

    Director Coiro says: “The film was inspired by a set of tapes I made of my own Grandmother before she passed away, by Kate Bosworth, whose ability to tap into a rare, broken and wounded fragility informed the lead character of Jane; a character I wrote just for her, by my desire to figure out the meaning of Leonard Cohen’s song ‘Famous Blue Raincoat’ and by the island of Ischia, whose magical light, intriguing history, warm people and gorgeous vistas made me feel, as Grandma Eves says, that ‘time is shiftable.’

    At least KB’s still friends with her Black Rock director Katie Asleton, though KA hasn’t cast her in any of her projects since BR.

  • Superman’s GF

    This Kat chick sounds as pretentious and delusional as Kate.

    And by the way I think Alex and Kate were broken up long before they said they were. There was never a confirmed time frame of when they got together so why would there be a confirmed date of when they broke up? I always thought it was a much, much shorter relationship than people believe. Two years is a joke. I’d put it more at 1 year and that’s with a couple of break-ups.


    It wasn’t a real relay. It was a P.R. stunt.

  • Backstabbing

    @Superman’s GF:
    I totally agree that it wasn’t a long term relationship. Putting it at a year is pushing it. However, when she hooked up with MP,it was still assumed that they were together since Alex and KB were a Coachella together literally the weekend before she started shooting Big Sur. From her InStyle article, she mentions that MP said they’d get married just days after they’d started working together. Sounds like someone was following her usual MO. I also agree that the relationship had a PR aspect to it.

    My big question is how long can such a codependent relationship last? They are both so creepy and needy and clingy. Their level of weirdness seems hard to maintain in the long term. What happens when she’s no longer in the spotlight?

  • ladybug

    @Backstabbing: In some ways the MP KB relationship reminds me of some ice dancers and pairs skaters who are in relationships off the ice as well-they’re together almost literally 24 hours a day. I guess it works for them, but it’s a little weird.
    And KB and MP seem to feed off each other in their ‘oh my partner is the most wonderful artist’ crap. It’s offputting, and it does come off as co-dependent and super-clingy.
    The ‘what happens when she’s no longer in the spotlight’ has been asked since they got together, since he’s not remotely at the level of fame as two of her three previous bfs. And right now she still has fashion, but how long will that last.?
    And has been noted, the number of posts and number of comments per posts has dropped quite a bit in last few months. So fashion alone isn’t going to keep her in the gossip spotlight.
    Maybe in a couple of years she can finally reapply to Princeton and actually attend this time!

  • Superman’s GF


    Naw, I don’t believe that. I believe it was real but not healthy.


    Yes it was. It was very much a P.R. stunt. Real for you, not real for those two fools (AS and KB).

  • ladybug

    I guess she’s referencing Nirvana’s album cover with this, but other than both having water I’m not seeing the similarity:

  • Tanter

    Her comments on the relationship with MP – especially about how it started – really doesn’t match the way she obviously wanted to portray her relationship with Alex. Personally I think it was a real relationship but how we saw it and how it was presented was heavily influenced by (her) pr. I don’t think it lasted almost two years and I also think their feelings on what they were and where they were going were quite different.

  • Macy

    I agree. I’d put it at about 14 months or so.

  • ladybug

    I have no idea what/when happened at the end her relationship with AS and the beginning of her relationship with MP. And and, two years later, not sure I really care, except to note that she seems to be going out of her way to make it appear there was no overlap.

    Kate has struck me as one of those people who will easily change her narrative to suite what she is believing in at the time.

    So we get this from her newest magazine interview: “When I met Michael all that magical side of believing in a soul mate returned” Alrighty then.
    She also says of her childhood: “I was a bit of a show off.” Funny, because I’m pretty sure until recently she was saying how shy she was and what a mousy bookworm she was.

  • Tulip

    @ladybug: I could easily have offered comments from other reviewers:

    Bosworth is an undeniable screen presence, and she smiles with her entire body, seducing the camera with considerable ease. Indiewire

    This elegant and beautifully staged Italy-set drama offers Kate Bosworth the perfect acting vehicle, playing a beautiful but emotionally troubled young woman who seeks to escape the mundanity of her marriage while on a trip to the Amalfi coast.
    Kate Bosworth is strikingly good as Jane, with the film dwelling on her haunted sad beauty (her face and posture is also perfect for black-and-white), and providing a nicely complex role for her.
    Bosworth’s performance keeps the film nicely on track Screen Daily

    In her best performance to date, Kate Bosworth plays Jane, the wife of a stoic and preoccupied viola player, Leonard (Iddo Goldberg). Epoch Times

    Bosworth so strongly evokes Jean Seberg in “Breathless.”
    Bosworth blossoms gloriously as Jane finds her erotic footing — but is precise and moving, much like the film itself. Daily Variety

    Kate Bosworth looks even more gorgeous in black and white as evidenced by While We Were Here, an Italy-set relationship drama that makes the most of the luminous beauty of both its star and the locations of Naples and the island of Ischia off the Amalfi coast
    It’s all familiar stuff, but it works to a certain extent thanks to Bosworth’s sensitive performance and Goldberg’s nuanced turn as the cuckolded husband. The Hollywood Reporter

    While We Were Here is not only an homage to the great “voyage to Italy” films, but, with its black and white cinematography, also evokes the look of classic Italian Neorealist drama. As Jane wanders through the narrow streets of Spaccanapoli, one would almost expect a young Sophia Loren, in her role as a voluptuous pizza maker in De Sica’s The Gold of Naples, to appear around the corner. And though Kate Bosworth might be the physical opposite of Sophia Loren, her slim blonde beauty and reserved quality do resemble that of such ‘60s actresses as the pixyish Jean Seberg from Godard’sBreathless (even down to the striped sailor top) and the cool, lovely Monica Vitti in Antonioni’s masterpiece of alienation,L’Avventura. Beyond looks though, Bosworth’s strong, sensitive acting forms the emotional core of the film (in particular in one standout scene with Goldberg’s Leonard), and she and Blackley have a number of amusing scenes in which their easy banter make the movie eminently watchable. LFM Reviews

    Bosworth is an undeniable screen presence, and she smiles with her entire body, seducing the camera with considerable ease.
    As a showcase for Ms. Bosworth, never better, it’s often sublime. SupervisorWire

    Think of a slow, thoughtful perfume commercial then add a few actors that know exactly what they’re doing. Kate Bosworth possesses magnetism. She was brilliant as the athlete in Blue Crush and she is stunning here in Black & White. Her talents are subdued but she delivers with tremendous confidence. Gorgeous Beast

  • ladybug

    @Tulip: The last one was funny, though I’m not sure this blog is quite up to the esteem of having Variety say nice things about it:

    We went through this when it debuted at Tribeca in 2012. Yes it got some nice reviews, better than she’s received in literally years. And yet, it doesn’t seem to have helped her acting career.

    Visually, the movie looks nice. It’s available for download starting today, so I hope you enjoy it. But the reality is, she doesn’t have much of acting career, not now. Even her fashion supporters have finally noticed that.

  • ladybug

    Per Page Six, New York Post, she finally got someone to buy the wedding pics:

    “Kate Bosworth is finally going to tie the knot this month. The actress and fashion plate is getting married to director Michael Polish in a “country- style wedding” at the end of the month. Sources tell us photos from the ceremony will also be featured in “Martha Stewart Weddings.” (Blake Lively did the same with her wedding to Ryan Reynolds.) Bosworth and Polish had been dating since 2011, but Polish put a ring on it last September, and she posted a picture of the ring on Twitter.”

  • Macy

    So now we fancy ourselves to be like Blake Lively? Uh huh.

  • ladybug

    @Macy: Apparently she does. But remember, this is supposed to be a low key wedding!

    “Bosworth is marrying Michael Polish this month. According to Page Six, her event will be featured in Martha Stewart. I wonder though if her preference would have been VOGUE. Please. You are not Kate Moss. You are not even Blake Lively.

    Remember this? That “JUST LIKE HEAVEN” pretty much sums up this couple. There are VOGUE couples and there are Martha Stewart couples and then there are Instagram couples. Kate + Michael = Instagram wedding couple.”

    OTOH, it has gotten her mentioned on sites that haven’t mentioned her in months, so she’s getting some mileage from it.

  • Puh-leez

    I love all this stuff that comes from “a source”. If it’s true Kate’s getting married soon, best wishes to her and a big congrats to Michael. Kate’s a Vogue girl (class and grace) and she’ll be a beautiful bride.

  • Macy

    I read that. I thought it was totally amusing to refer to them as an Instagram couple because it’s so true. I’m sure it will be a nonstop tweet fest leading up to it with lamewad captions.

  • ladybug

    @Puh-leez: Oh, it’s Page Six, so who knows how true it is. And yet, it’s been commented on here for over a year that she wants to sell the pics, but that no one was biting.

    Kate’s a Vogue girl, class and grace? Well, it’s not that she’s classless, like the Kartrashians or a LiLo. But to me she really does want to see herself as a high class woman. She would never see herself as a famewhore, or high maintenance. So she insists the wedding is going to be low key -except that she’s apparently sold the pics to a magazine. She and MP see themselves as these amazing artists, but they’re not really.

  • Fashionista

    @#38: I agree with you.
    @ladybug: Kate’s very much a VOGUE girl. She’s at the #1 table of the Met Ball every time she’s the guest of the designer co-host. Trust me, if she was the person you want to believe she is, she wouldn’t be invited to the Met Ball! Can you tell me where it says she sold the pictures?

  • ladybug

    @Fashionista: Usually, if wedding pics are appearing exclusively in a magazine, money was exchanged. You think Lively and Reynolds didn’t sell their pics from last year?
    Can you tell me where it says she always sits at the top table. I think we went through this last year, and neither you nor Tulip could prove that assumption of yours.
    “Trust me, if she was the person you want to believe she is, she wouldn’t be invited to the Met Ball! ” Um, no, she would, since she still a fashion darling in some circles, whether or not she’s a famewhore. As I wrote, she’s not on the trashy level of the Kardashians, but then, even Kim has been to the Met now.

  • Fashionista

    @ladybug: “As I wrote, she’s not on the trashy level of the Kardashians, but then, even Kim has been to the Met now.” Right because Anna W. likes Kanye W.
    “Can you tell me where it says she always sits at the top table.” Use common sense. If Kate’s at the Ball with the Valentino haute couture designers and Anne Hathaway, Prada with Gwyneth & Carey Mulligan, or she’s fashion king Karl Lagerfeld’s date, she’s at the top table. I didn’t say she’s always at the top table.
    “Usually, if wedding pics are appearing exclusively in a magazine, money was exchanged. You think Lively and Reynolds didn’t sell their pics from last year?” Not necessarily. They might have a nice relationship with Martha Stewart. Perhaps she planned the event. Who knows.

  • Backstabbing

    Haha Celebitchy has the best take on this. The comments are the best.

    kooky says:
    August 15, 2013 at 10:02 am
    Askars may have been into her in the beginning, but I think he is probably relieved now….ouldn’t it be hilarious if they got married on 8/25/2013 Askars B-day? it would show what a true B she really is!!!!

    Maureen says:
    August 15, 2013 at 2:28 pm
    @ Seszie
    You sound suspiciously like a pro-Kate poster elsewhere called “Fashionista”. I only say that because the two of you are literally the only people I have ever read write such absurdly glowing things about Kate (and things that blatantly aren’t true–like her being natural) and you write in exactly the same manner.

  • Macy

    She’s not at the top table, she’s at ONE of the many tables there. Plus lots of people get invited to the MET gala that aren’t exactly top notch. Kim Kardashian is a big stand out from this year, but there have been others. Plus, just because fashion people give you clothes doesn’t mean you don’t whore yourself out for paps every chance you get or are a nice person. The two aren’t exclusive. I’m not saying she’s a bad person, but you seem to think just because she goes to the MET ball this makes her above reproach and it doesn’t. It merely means that fahsion people invite her to a party because she got a rail thin body and they like people with those bodies to wear their clothes.
    Also, no with the Martha Stewart relationship. Have you ever heard her talk about Martha before? Heard Martha talk about her? Seen them together at all? Look, I get you like her but this is a business and these people buy and sell publicity all the time. That’s just the way it goes. If Martha does run the photos, it will be because she bought the rights to do so and probably featured some of her products or ideas in the wedding.

  • Suze

    Unlike Blake’s photos, I’m sure we’ll be seeing pictures of Kate & Michael as they celebrate their American-ness.

  • ladybug

    @Fashionista: “Use common sense”. I ask the same of you. Plus throw in some reading comprehension.
    “You think Lively and Reynolds didn’t sell their pics from last year?” Not necessarily. They might have a nice relationship with Martha Stewart. Perhaps she planned the event. Who knows.”
    Oh, probably money will be exchanged if she’s showing the pics. Money was probably exchanged for Lively/Reynolds. Sorry, that’s the way the real world works. Perhaps it offends you, like not wanting to think she’s a famewhore.
    I don’t like her, but I don’t think she’s evil, I do try to apply some nuance to what I think of her.
    You (and Tulip), however, seem incapable of thinking that she might have ‘issues’. Just because because you like you doesn’t mean she has to be ‘perfect’. She’s flawed person, just like everyone else. She just happens to put those flaws up for public display.

  • mforman

    First both Blake L and Jennifer G have spoken about friendships and admiration for Martha S. We all know that the famewhore and the hobbit will show not only their faces, but anything and everything else, plus I cannot read whatever this thing is going to say in an article, if that is included.
    ENEWS, stated that the wedding is at the end of the month in Montana, and her equally famewhoring mother is helping to plan the “country style” wedding.
    I cannot wait to start reading her tweets about this, because they are going to start any day now.
    Let us not forget that the creature only returned to the Met Gala the last two years. Whether it was GOOP preventing it or something else she wasn’t there. Then when KB returned the first year it was the feather thing from PRADA and then this year that stupid dress from BALMAIN (I know I spelled it wrong), KB and MP looked absolutely ridiculous this year, they weren’t punk, they looked they were going out trick or treating. Sorry but she has never been at a Top Table and never will.
    @Fashionista——You and Tulip will never, ever say anything bad about the creature or now the hobbit. I would love to know what you think is so amazing about her.
    @ladybug—– As you said no one was biting she called on Martha S, because she wanted to try anything and like you also said it has gotten her quite a lot of attention again, since we know she wont be around promoting WWWT.
    I do consider her evil, she uses people for what she can get out of them and then drops them like she never knew them, but always at the time calls them a friend, which is evil. Also, I will always believe like I always have that she is not only a famewhore but that she is a vapid, void, waste of space, that cares about herself and herself alone unless it brings her some notice. KB is truly a horrible person in my eyes and I have seen and believed that since Blue Crush.

  • Macy

    Wasn’t that on their twitters a year ago? Something about Montana, 2013 and she answered yes. They’ve been trying to build intrigue about this bunk wedding for a year, with her posting photos of herself wearing her ring, etc but there hasn’t really been much uptake.

  • ladybug

    @Macy: The Montana teasers were on their Twitters a year ago. It was mentioned at the time it was alluding to their wedding.
    New York Fashion Week is the first week of September, will the wedding/honeymoon interfere with her big papwalk week?
    She’ll get mentioned for the wedding, and then the Martha Stewart stuff, when that’s published.
    But after that, probably not much.