Top Stories

Jamie Dornan & Dakota Johnson: 'Fifty Shades of Grey' Movie First Photos!

Jamie Dornan & Dakota Johnson: 'Fifty Shades of Grey' Movie First Photos!

Check out this very first look of Jamie Dornan as Christian Grey and Dakota Johnson as Anastasia Steele in Fifty Shades of Grey on the new cover of Entertainment Weekly!

The 31-year-old actor and 24-year-old actress cozy up together in various photos, the first time we’ve seen them in character for the highly-anticipated film adaptation.

PHOTOS: Check out the latest pics of Fifty Shades of Grey

It was just announced that the movie’s release date would be pushed back from August 1, 2014 to February 13, 2015, just in time for Valentine’s Day.

For more on this Fifty Shades of Grey spread, visit EW.com!

WHAT DO YOU THINK of Jamie and Dakota as Christian and Ana in these photos???

Like Just Jared on Facebook
jamie dornan 50 shades of grey first movie photos 01
jamie dornan 50 shades of grey first movie photos 02
jamie dornan 50 shades of grey first movie photos 03
jamie dornan 50 shades of grey first movie photos 04
jamie dornan 50 shades of grey first movie photos 05

Photos: Entertainment Weekly
Posted to: Dakota Johnson, Fifty Shades of Grey, Jamie Dornan

JJ Links Around The Web

Christopher Polk/Getty

115 Comments

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 » Show All
# 1

but….. he is ugly!!!! O.o

# 2

They are STUNNING together!!!

# 3

These pictures don’t make him justice :/

# 4

IM SO THRILLED!! i can’t even…They’re PERFECTION!!

# 5

Dakota looks awkward and miscast in all those photos esp the one where she’s wearing converse. The guy, you can clearly see that he’s used to doing photoshoots. lol at the fact that they may be trying hard to make her look “alexis bledel” as possible with the bangs and the doe eye look.

# 6
fifty shade of bad writing @ 11/13/2013 at 10:37 am

AHAHAHA OH MY GOD THIS IS GOING TO BE A TRAINWRECK. I cannot wait.

# 7

Ugly??? go to your opthamologist for a visit please!!!

# 8

with the news of this movie being pushed back for well over a year…this cover is not helping.

# 9

Um, this is who they picked for Ana? That’s bullshit, she looks hardly anything like Ana is described and looks old and not very innocent despite her efforts. He looks like a wimp here too.

She always looks so sloppy.

WTF IS THIS??? This isn’t Fifty Shades of Grey, it’s Fifty Shades of FAILED!

@Nelly: What a rude thing to say – he is a handsome guy. Grow up.

HAHAHA is she trying to look innocent? She definitely doesn’t and she looks SUPER OLD! What’s with her hair too? That’s not Ana’s hair…

living in a box @ 11/13/2013 at 10:54 am

i thought that alex pettyfer!

@fifty shade of bad writing:
I agree. Not to mention the millions of hurting individuals out there (who won’t see the film) who suffer from child abuse are being exploited. And who are told that love cures all because some fool takes it upon herself to expose aching souls for money writing horribly-written dialogue and unrealistic scenes that make anyone who knows anyone who suffers so much from this ailment piss-roaring mad.
~K

The casting director messed up. He looks like a serial killer. They needed someone that women would fantasized about. She looks old for 24.

Yeah, hold the tie. Duh. Really? Now we see the real reason Charlie bailed. Wise man him.
~K

Wait, they’re not going to give him his trademark gray eyes? Oh, okay. And we have a leaning photo when we all, or anyone whose read at least one book (all I could manage to get through) he does not like being touche? Eh? Who’s in charge of the shoot? Anyone who read the book? Is the director near? Someone, anyone, who knows stuff? Lord and Entertainment Weekly is a huge publication. Details matter people. Everything matters.
~K

This is just laughable!!!

i think they are alright! people should stop all the negative comments and try looking at the positive side of things. remember how everyone was criticizing about robert pattinson being casted as edward? well it turned out pretty well…

i believe jamie and dakota are 2 talented individuals. we’ll just wait for the movie ! :D

Is the dude standing on a box? Because we can see their upper body seems to be the same size, specially in the 2nd pic. Am I the only one who finds he’s a bit short?

i am sick to freaking death of hearing about this movie. the books were trash, i cant see this movie being any better, no matter who plays the parts.

I read the books a week ago (gooooooooood awful, how did these become famous?) and while I think Dornan is sexy, he doesn’t really fit the build of Christian Grey. I just saw a picture of Tom Brady looking pretty good, he was walking with Gisele looking casual (http://media4.onsugar.com/files/2013/11/11/887/n/1922398/09c1b00a0fd8352d_spl647074_005_wm.preview_tall.jpg) but I thought the entire look would look better as Christian. Not saying he should be THAT tall or even look like Tom, but body style and shape, a taller muscular body instead of someone who looks a little shorter and not as muscular (like Dornan looks in these pictures). And Dakota does look way off as Anastasia. Didn’t think Bledel should have played her, but someone similar who looks a little smaller, more mousy and demure and shy looking than Dakota does in these pictures.

This book was originally Twilight fan fiction, right? So knowing it was going off of Stephanie’s book and who Stephanie originally wanted as Edward, I think Henry Cavill would have looked better in this role. Not saying he should have taken it now, but had he not done Man of Steel, I think he would have been perfect in this role. He was overly muscular in Man of Steel, but he could have toned it down. He was pretty good looking and not overly muscular in The Tudors. I know many wanted Matt Bomer but he’s too old looking and I don’t get the appeal.

I would agree with this casting if their roles were reversed. She looks much more like a Dom.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 » Show All

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here