Top Stories

Jamie Dornan & Dakota Johnson: 'Fifty Shades of Grey' Movie First Photos!

Jamie Dornan & Dakota Johnson: 'Fifty Shades of Grey' Movie First Photos!

Check out this very first look of Jamie Dornan as Christian Grey and Dakota Johnson as Anastasia Steele in Fifty Shades of Grey on the new cover of Entertainment Weekly!

The 31-year-old actor and 24-year-old actress cozy up together in various photos, the first time we’ve seen them in character for the highly-anticipated film adaptation.

PHOTOS: Check out the latest pics of Fifty Shades of Grey

It was just announced that the movie’s release date would be pushed back from August 1, 2014 to February 13, 2015, just in time for Valentine’s Day.

For more on this Fifty Shades of Grey spread, visit EW.com!

WHAT DO YOU THINK of Jamie and Dakota as Christian and Ana in these photos???

Like Just Jared on Facebook
jamie dornan 50 shades of grey first movie photos 01
jamie dornan 50 shades of grey first movie photos 02
jamie dornan 50 shades of grey first movie photos 03
jamie dornan 50 shades of grey first movie photos 04
jamie dornan 50 shades of grey first movie photos 05

Photos: Entertainment Weekly
Posted to: Dakota Johnson, Fifty Shades of Grey, Jamie Dornan

JJ Links Around The Web

Michael Buckner/Getty

115 Responses to “Jamie Dornan & Dakota Johnson: 'Fifty Shades of Grey' Movie First Photos!”

  1. 1
    Nelly Says:

    but….. he is ugly!!!! O.o

  2. 2
    Ada Says:

    They are STUNNING together!!!

  3. 3
    roronette Says:

    These pictures don’t make him justice :/

  4. 4
    melissa Says:

    IM SO THRILLED!! i can’t even…They’re PERFECTION!!

  5. 5
    unknown Says:

    Dakota looks awkward and miscast in all those photos esp the one where she’s wearing converse. The guy, you can clearly see that he’s used to doing photoshoots. lol at the fact that they may be trying hard to make her look “alexis bledel” as possible with the bangs and the doe eye look.

  6. 6
    fifty shade of bad writing Says:

    AHAHAHA OH MY GOD THIS IS GOING TO BE A TRAINWRECK. I cannot wait.

  7. 7
    eLENA Says:

    Ugly??? go to your opthamologist for a visit please!!!

  8. 8
    LOL Says:

    with the news of this movie being pushed back for well over a year…this cover is not helping.

  9. 9
    Mel Says:

    Um, this is who they picked for Ana? That’s bullshit, she looks hardly anything like Ana is described and looks old and not very innocent despite her efforts. He looks like a wimp here too.

  10. 10
    Ana Says:

    She always looks so sloppy.

  11. 11
    Sam Says:

    WTF IS THIS??? This isn’t Fifty Shades of Grey, it’s Fifty Shades of FAILED!

  12. 12
    Racy Says:

    @Nelly: What a rude thing to say – he is a handsome guy. Grow up.

  13. 13
    Lisa Says:

    HAHAHA is she trying to look innocent? She definitely doesn’t and she looks SUPER OLD! What’s with her hair too? That’s not Ana’s hair…

  14. 14
    living in a box Says:

    i thought that alex pettyfer!

  15. 15
    GFW Says:

    @fifty shade of bad writing:
    I agree. Not to mention the millions of hurting individuals out there (who won’t see the film) who suffer from child abuse are being exploited. And who are told that love cures all because some fool takes it upon herself to expose aching souls for money writing horribly-written dialogue and unrealistic scenes that make anyone who knows anyone who suffers so much from this ailment piss-roaring mad.
    ~K

  16. 16
    allison Says:

    The casting director messed up. He looks like a serial killer. They needed someone that women would fantasized about. She looks old for 24.

  17. 17
    GFW Says:

    Yeah, hold the tie. Duh. Really? Now we see the real reason Charlie bailed. Wise man him.
    ~K

  18. 18
    GFW Says:

    Wait, they’re not going to give him his trademark gray eyes? Oh, okay. And we have a leaning photo when we all, or anyone whose read at least one book (all I could manage to get through) he does not like being touche? Eh? Who’s in charge of the shoot? Anyone who read the book? Is the director near? Someone, anyone, who knows stuff? Lord and Entertainment Weekly is a huge publication. Details matter people. Everything matters.
    ~K

  19. 19
    Sara Says:

    This is just laughable!!!

  20. 20
    lol Says:

    i think they are alright! people should stop all the negative comments and try looking at the positive side of things. remember how everyone was criticizing about robert pattinson being casted as edward? well it turned out pretty well…

    i believe jamie and dakota are 2 talented individuals. we’ll just wait for the movie ! :D

  21. 21
    Manheels Says:

    Is the dude standing on a box? Because we can see their upper body seems to be the same size, specially in the 2nd pic. Am I the only one who finds he’s a bit short?

  22. 22
    ang Says:

    i am sick to freaking death of hearing about this movie. the books were trash, i cant see this movie being any better, no matter who plays the parts.

  23. 23
    b Says:

    I read the books a week ago (gooooooooood awful, how did these become famous?) and while I think Dornan is sexy, he doesn’t really fit the build of Christian Grey. I just saw a picture of Tom Brady looking pretty good, he was walking with Gisele looking casual (http://media4.onsugar.com/files/2013/11/11/887/n/1922398/09c1b00a0fd8352d_spl647074_005_wm.preview_tall.jpg) but I thought the entire look would look better as Christian. Not saying he should be THAT tall or even look like Tom, but body style and shape, a taller muscular body instead of someone who looks a little shorter and not as muscular (like Dornan looks in these pictures). And Dakota does look way off as Anastasia. Didn’t think Bledel should have played her, but someone similar who looks a little smaller, more mousy and demure and shy looking than Dakota does in these pictures.

  24. 24
    b Says:

    This book was originally Twilight fan fiction, right? So knowing it was going off of Stephanie’s book and who Stephanie originally wanted as Edward, I think Henry Cavill would have looked better in this role. Not saying he should have taken it now, but had he not done Man of Steel, I think he would have been perfect in this role. He was overly muscular in Man of Steel, but he could have toned it down. He was pretty good looking and not overly muscular in The Tudors. I know many wanted Matt Bomer but he’s too old looking and I don’t get the appeal.

  25. 25
    Anna Says:

    I would agree with this casting if their roles were reversed. She looks much more like a Dom.

  26. 26
    Sheyenne Says:

    I don’t see why people are overrating. It’s a movie! Everyone needs to leave them alone and stop going crazy because they don’t look like what we expected. I’m excited for the movie hopefully it does well.

  27. 27
    breezedash Says:

    What’s wrong with these books? I really don’t understand why people hate them so. Just books for women, with a lot of sex scenes, so what???
    P.S. Dorman push me off with his Christian-image look. He’s SO NOT C. Grey, really. He looks different. I hope maybe his talent will help him and he’ll does this role well…

  28. 28
    Arrow 12 Says:

    She looks to old to be playing Ana.

  29. 29
    Mike Says:

    ***END WHITE SUPREMACY in the NFL*** !!! The NFL and COCA COLA are promoting RACISM, BIGOTRY, and ETHNIC BULLYING with the sponsorship of the Washington “Redskins” team nickname. They are supporting, enabling, and profiting off of Institutional Racism. The NFL, Redskins, and sponsor COCA COLA are violating Federal Labor Laws by promoting racial discrimination in the workplace WITH racial slurs and ethnic hostility.
    .
    End the ethnic Bullying and Institutional Racism perpetuated by writing to COCA COLA, and your Senator or Congressman to strip the NFL from its tax exempt status. As Taxpaying citizens of the United States, we demand that our government end financial benefits to organizations that promote INSTITUTIONAL RACISM, Bigotry, and Ethnic BULLYING.

  30. 30
    M Says:

    Well, it seems that my imagination is pretty different of EL James in what regards Christian and Anastasia.
    She looks too mature than she’s described in the book, and the guy looks much younger than Christian supposed to be.

  31. 31
    pika Says:

    well this looks terrible – can i get an Amen??

  32. 32
    Jessie Says:

    I only saw the shape of her arm, especially around the elbow and it look hilarious to me. I don’t know if it’s the way it’s photo-shopped but I can’t stop laughing.
    -
    Ok, enough frivolity. No one is going to be perfect for these roles, people will always disagree. I’m still with the person who can’t believe this ghastly fiction is going to be a film.
    .
    Of course the books made millions and they want to cash in on that, but they were horribly written which is more of a concern to me. Is there any doubt why literacy is going to .hell? There have been books about the subject matter around for years and all of the ones I read were better written. But the grown up Twilight crowd must have been locked in closets to be so overly titillated over the content .
    .
    The sheer repetitiveness of the dialogue should make anyone who love to read pull their hair out. Listening to what’s inside of Ana’s head should be used as a form of torture. What a dumb little twat. Anyway, good luck with that, I have no interest in seeing it as I could barely make it halfway through the first book.

  33. 33
    Missy Says:

    Charlie was the better C.G. for sure o_O

  34. 34
    Nadja Says:

    Okay, he is pretty hot, even though it’s not really how I pictured CG to look like, but WTF were they thinking when they castet her?!

  35. 35
    Daphne Says:

    Can’t he like keep his beard? She looks too old. Should of choose someone younger

  36. 36
    Julie Says:

    Their casting choIces are horrible, he is NOT Christian Grey worthy! I was excited about the movie but not anymore, I will just stick to the books now that they’ve destroyed the character of Christian. …

  37. 37
    Jo Says:

    Don’t get all the hate for her. I think she looks cute here!!??? I’m not sure about HIM, honestly!!!

  38. 38
    Easnadh Says:

    This will be cheap :-)

  39. 39
    brightviolette Says:

    I almost screened when I saw this lol! Dakota looks cute, Jamie looks sexy…I’m loving it!!

  40. 40
    samantha Says:

    LMAO, who in their right mind would believe this woman is an “innocent” blushing virgin??! And is this supposed to be the most beautiful man that makes women drop their panties with a simple look? Well, well, well, they really think 50shades fans are super stupid obviously, and judging by the enthusiastic reactions, maybe they are…

  41. 41
    Rose Says:

    Everybody wanted someone else. Personally I wanted Tom Welling and Alexis Bledel. But they didn’t have any money to pay for top celebrities, so they had to go with someone new not because they chose that, Yeah she’s cute, it’s just that she doesn’t portray 21, not even 24 which is her actual age! They still look hot together, so maybe there’s hope for this movie.

  42. 42
    Daphne Says:

    @Jo: she looks too old and not innocent enough for Ana. Could of casted her as Kate

  43. 43
    lyss Says:

    ok at first i wasn’t really liking this pair at all…but these pictures did me justice OMG IM IN LOVEEEEEE. but pissed they had to now make us wait even longer till 2015 wtf

  44. 44
    Kayte Says:

    @Jo: @Jo: I agree and people wanted Alexis Bledel. I think they’re pretty similar looking.

  45. 45
    JJ Says:

    @samantha:
    YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT!!!

  46. 46
    JJ Says:

    @Sam:

    I’m agree with you

  47. 47
    JJ Says:

    @pika: AMEN!!!!

  48. 48
    JJ Says:

    WHAT’S WRONG WITH THIS PEOPLE THEY ARE ABSOLUTELY NOT OK FOR THIS MOVIE!!!!!

    I prefer Matt and Alexis or Ian and Alexis or Nina Even Emma Watson looks WAY BETTER for Ana!

    Dakota looks too OLD and absolutely NOT inocent, (DID ANA HAS BANGS?), and He is Just NOT the Christian Grey I would choose he is UGLY!!!! O.o THIS MOVIE CAST IS JUST FAILED!! IT SUCKS! definitely not going to see that movie!

  49. 49
    eh Says:

    @M: your imagination isnt different from ELJ’s -the problem was NOONE wanted the roles. NONE of the actors ELJ wanted agreed to be in it…when she finally got someone she actually wanted (charlie hunnam) he took one look at the script and bailed.its a shame they had to settle. dana brunetti has said “theres alot more that goes into casting than just looks” -obviously brunetti didnt read the books otherwise he would’ve known that ELJ describes the characters “looks” every other page and its not just an oversight!

  50. 50
    GOOD MOVE CHARLIE!! Says:

    NOW EVERYONE KNOWS CHARLIES DEPARTURE WASNT DUE TO TIMING. FIRST THEY PUSH BACK FILMING ONE MONTH, NOW THE RELEASE DATE ISNT UNTIL FEB 2015. ITS SO OBVIOUS THEY HAD MORE THAN ENOUGH TIME FOR CHARLIE TO “PREPARE” FOR THE ROLE. ITS CHARLIE WHO OBVIOUSLY DIDNT WANT TO BE A PART OF THIS PRODUCTION//CASTING SPECTACLE ….

  51. 51
    WORST CASTING DIRECTOR!!! Says:

    FSOG peeps: WAKE UP and smell THE BAD ANA! HORRID CASTING. HORRID!!! geez did ELJ forget her own descriptios in the book. weird since its mentioned 500 times!

  52. 52
    Jen Says:

    Wow, they both look AMAZING! Perfect Christian & Anastasia!

  53. 53
    SHUT IT Says:

    Please FOR THE LOVE OF GOD SHUT UP. You all are so annoying. They picked these actors…so get over it. It’s just a movie. I did not imagine these actors EITHER for the parts, but I’m not shitting everywhere because of the casting. It’s an average book…it will probably do well in theaters…SO SHUT YOUR FACES.

    ALSO, You guys know DEEP DOWN Jamie is not ugly either. He’s a damn model.

  54. 54
    Aisaiko Says:

    Underwhelming to say the least. This is so far from what I was expecting. Unless this dude is a young John Malkovich, I don’t see me enjoying this movie.

  55. 55
    Pao Juna Says:

    It’s too long…FEB 15…2015!!!!??? Come on!!! I even couldn’t wait for August 1…!!! this is bad, After all, they’re so perfect together.

  56. 56
    anna Says:

    @b: I also wanted Henry Cavill, I read the book thinking of him!! Dornan is really hot too, especially as the huntsman in once upon a time, but I’m not sure he fits the part, let’s wait and see! she, on the other hand, isn’t as pretty as Emilia Clarke, who I envisioned, but she looks shy and awkward as the character should be, so I’m fine with her being cast!

  57. 57
    anna Says:

    @M: No he isn’t, he’s supposed to be 27! Dornan is older, actually!

  58. 58
    BOX-OFFICE LITERARY REVIEW Says:

    America still hasn’t even heard of this stupid British book, let alone the movie and these two loser caucasian actors, so WHO CARES?? No one cares but the soulless marketing trolls on internet comment blogs such as this one, JJ.

  59. 59
    Nina Says:

    @fifty shade of bad writing: lol couldn’t have said it better

  60. 60
    roo Says:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5-PE83DrwM

    this should have been 50 shades HENRY CAVILL :( too bad its not him

  61. 61
    AMERICAN TRUTH Says:

    @Mike: Don’t know where you’re coming from. The American species comes in light-skinned white to dark-skinned deep red, always has since evolution millions of years ago. From Montezuma to Geronimo, and from Washington to Tecumseh. America is an entire hemisphere. You write like an ill-educated alien, probably communist like british or chinese. Your politics don’t reflect America, obviously. The Washington Redskins And Our Great American Head are perfectly fine, obviously.

  62. 62
    Truth Says:

    Jamie Is gorgeous.. but Dakota is one ugly chick & can’t act to save her life.. nepotism at is finest.. this girl shouldn’t be doing film no appeal whatsoever!

  63. 63
    Jupiter Says:

    Ridiculous

  64. 64
    LMAO Says:

    Dakota is channeling the (still) ethereal & virginal looks of Alexis Bledel here but looks more like crackhead & tranny Alexis!

  65. 65
    Sam Says:

    She’s more like the dom and he the sub! This is an awful pair and are horribly cast for both characters! She is too tall and looks SO OLD and not beautiful and innocent, and he is too short and scrawny and not dominant looking. This is just pathetic!

  66. 66
    erin Says:

    HAHAHA Dakota is trying so hard to look innocent but she’s failing miserably!! She looks old enough to be Christian’s mother btw!

  67. 67
    Mena Says:

    @SHUT IT: He is unattractive and his nose is ugly and so is dakota johnson and her nose too! If they wanted Jamie before then he would’ve been approached before, but he wasn’t! And Dakota was cast because they couldn’t get any of who they originally wanted for Ana and the director is friends with her mother!

  68. 68
    Heather Says:

    She is so homely and old looking. So not Ana! Ana in the books is petite, BEAUTIFUL, has a small sweet face and delicate profile and BIG eyes. Dakota is the opposite. The only thing she embodies of Ana is her pale skin and being slender. Jamie looks too small and not powerful at all! He’ll have to stand on a box when she is in heels!

  69. 69
    Joelle Says:

    breezedash @ 11/13/2013 at 12:07 pm #27
    *
    The books were not criticized for the content. James isn’t the first one to wrote steamy sex or about BDSM. Nothing is shocking about that if you’ve read adult literature in the past few years. What is abhorrent about her books is that they are so badly written. The whole premise of the books is ridiculous.

  70. 70
    Pregnant wife Says:

    I wonder what his pregnant wife thinks about it?

  71. 71
    AnnaStern Says:

    So much blablabla…
    It’s just ONE movie about a crappy book.
    Don’t like the casting? Don’t like the date? Don’t like the book?
    Then don’t go see it and move on!!!
    Gosh, quit bitchin, ppl.

  72. 72
    andrea2 Says:

    Perfect !

  73. 73
    mhoe Says:

    Dakota’s arms looks like a BUTT!
    And even w/ the nail/lip biting & full bangs all over her forehead; she could still passed like a 40 yr. old.

  74. 74
    Mandy Says:

    Let’s be honest, Everyone has a different picture of who their Christian and Ana would be so no one is going to be truly happy but come on they havent even started on it yet, Give them a chance

  75. 75
    Jen Says:

    @allison: totally agree

  76. 76
    Jen Says:

    gosh they tried to make her give off that ‘alexis bledel’ innocent vibe…which to me has failed. If they wanted that, they should have just hired alexis lol
    cannot picture him as CG at all; one of the posters above mentioned gisele’s husband tom and to me they’re exactly right with that. someone much more similar to his looks would have been better imo
    don’t know what the casting directors were thinking… oh well

  77. 77
    CINEMA TODAY MAGAZINE Says:

    So, besides the British marketing trolls you see here on this comment board and a few others still left, this misplaced British book never sold within America, the one-time target market for this fictional book. So, then, these British marketing trolls are barking to no one. The Americans didn’t buy the bogus book and they haven’t even heard of it or this bogus movie. Good luck with that, losers. God save your king, my eye.

  78. 78
    isha Says:

    LOL…Someone said it right…Why are you guys trying to make this Dakota look like Alexis Bledel..If they don’t think Alexis is fit to be in their mighty movie,why make their Ana look like her..Alexis should sue these guys..and by the way Charlie Hunnam had better chemistry with this lassie..She looks like a poor copy of Madonna. :P Plus that guy looks like OMG..So laughable seriously,these high&mighty snooty casting crew made a major mess by looking down upon fan favorites..Help!! LOL..they look almost funny than sexy..like a wall is standing next to a wooden block..

  79. 79
    Dasha Says:

    FAIL!! He’s not Christian Grey! How can we fantasize on him? Grey is supposed to be drop dead gorgeous!
    And what about her hair?? Definitely not Ana’s hair.
    Bad casting but maybe these actors will surprise us.

  80. 80
    isha Says:

    Alexis Bledel wannabe…LOL…Wood and Wall..So much chemistry that i wanto puke..ooops..Look at the guy’s face..More comedy than sexy..

  81. 81
    Uh Says:

    A porno is being released?

  82. 82
    AnnaStern Says:

    They didn’t cast Alexis because she would a freaking 40 y.o trying to play a 20 something by the end of the series. Gosh ppl! Think!

  83. 83
    HORRIBLE casting dakota!!!! Says:

    why are they making her look like alexis b.—not workin. she still looks too old for her years and NOTHING. NADA. ZIP. like the book describes anna to be. it wouldnt be a big deal if it werents for ELJ making a point of describing they’re looks every chance she got in the books. but she did!! dakota is the complete opposite of anna is in the books!

  84. 84
    very bad casting!! Says:

    regarding dakota johnson: for the peeps who come on here and say that people had the same reaction to twilight casting kristen stewart. BULLSH*T twilight author DIDNT make mention of her characters faces, bodies, hair, eyes, nose…lips! in EVERY chapter of her book like ELJ did in FSOG. so, they should’ve been WAY MORE detailed in the looks department when hiring the actors for this film!!!!!!!!!!

  85. 85
    jen Says:

    alexis may be 32, but she still has that innocent girl look to her, which from what i can see, a few other posters seem to think the same. with her looks, people would probably not even care to look up her age.

  86. 86
    wtf?? Says:

    they settled BIG TIME….with dakota!!

  87. 87
    em, seriously, NO! Says:

    LOLLLL did you see the pics of dakota biting her lips…she looks so f*ing lame. her looks make her looks like 30 year old desperately trying to look young and innocent. THERE’S A REASON WHY SHE ALWAYS GOT THE PARTS IN OTHER FILMS OF THE GIRL GETTING BANGED…..SHE-DOESNT-LOOK-INNOCENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!AND IS HORRIBLY CAST!!

  88. 88
    anne Says:

    @Pregnant wife:
    His wife should be concern with Sam the director hag who wanted to taste another boyish looking guy like Jamie

  89. 89
    gabii Says:

    @Rose: could it be, that real actors didn’t think this trash is worth anything

  90. 90
    anna Says:

    @HORRIBLE casting dakota!!!!: you’re crazy! They’re not trying to make her look lie Alexis, they’re trying to make her look like the character in the book, who looks like Alexis! Plus, she’s 24 and Alexis is 32! I also think she looks older, but you can’t say she looks nothing like the girl describer in the book! Ana isn’t supposed to be gorgeous, she’s supposed to be awkward, I think she’s doing a good job at it, here at least

  91. 91
    Kary Says:

    Whatever… the three books suck… It doesn’t matter who will be Christian Grey or Ana Steele because the books are BAD. So, the movie will suck just like twilight suck and no one will save this sh*t. I don’t understand why is a best seller.

  92. 92
    Isa Says:

    Gorgeous together !
    La parenthèse Enchantée.fr

  93. 93
    QTPIE Says:

    The casting is horrible they don’t look anything like the way the characters are described in the book, the guy is handsome but is NO Christian Grey.

  94. 94
    CHris Says:

    @B How is Matt Bomber old looking and Henry not? Matt actually looks younger than Henry. Matt wasn’t chosen because he’s a homosexual and studio execs thought that would stop women from watching it.

  95. 95
    CHris Says:

    @b How is Matt Bomber old looking and Henry not? Matt actually looks younger than Henry. Matt wasn’t chosen because he’s a homosexual and studio execs thought that would stop women from watching it.

  96. 96
    CHris Says:

    b@ How is Matt Bomber old looking and Henry not? Matt actually looks younger than Henry. Matt wasn’t chosen because he’s a homosexual and studio execs thought that would stop women from watching it.

  97. 97
    crissy Says:

    The guy is okay but the girl is sooooo plain. Wtf was Dana Brunetti thinking?

  98. 98
    WTF?!?! Says:

    @anna YOU’RE CRAZY!!!! To EVERONE HERE who’s stated they’re trying to make her look like alexis B. your 100% correct!!! Have you READ the books?!?!.. You must’ve read a VERY different version of FSOG. Anna thinks she’s ‘common’ but ALL THE MEN- CHRISTIAN, JOSE, PAUL, THE DUDE IN THE ELEVATOR, JACK, ETC. Thinks she’s beautiful… She’s beautiful. Petite and demure. AND Alexis b. is 32 but looks MUCH younger than Dakota. The number in age doesn’t matter, it’s about how she looks. And Dakota looks much older than the character in the books! anna has an upturned nose. Beautiful profile. Small face. And huge blue eyes..Dakota looks N-O-T-H-I-N-G!!!! like anna!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And remember ELJ mentions her description in every chapter. you can’t dismiss that when casting and they FAILED miserably with casting Dakota!

  99. 99
    wordshipper Says:

    I’m really starting to doubt the success of this movie. Her look screams pathetic, He seems to have only one expression and his hair is all wrong.

  100. 100
    JoyLee Says:

    It is amazing that when they announced a movie on the books. How fast they had preview videos with Henry Cavill and Matt Boner released. Now when they finally have picked the cast — they can’t seem to get a video together with these two characters.

  101. 101
    Belle Says:

    All i can think of is that this guy is a family man, he’s wrong for the role

  102. 102
    Fran Says:

    @GFW: Hey, if you read the book, you’ll know that he doesn’t like to be touched when he’s bare chested, with no shirt on. Ana can touch him when he wears something up

  103. 103
    tree Says:

    I know everyone has a different idea of who Christian and Ana should be and what they should look like and they can’t please everyone. I have to say that neither of these actors are what I imagined. Ana is supposed to look innocent, Dakota Johnson in no way looks innocent, she is very plain looking and there is nothing that draws you in. As for Jamie, he is too thin and once you shave the beard he loses that sexy edge. Neither do anything for me, I have my doubts about even going to the theatre to see this movie as I would rather continue to use my imagination
    .

  104. 104
    Joan Says:

    I know I am gonna be blasted for this, but I wanted Matt Bomer and Amanda Seyfried.

    Check out this YouTube vid of Matt Bomer in White Collar: http://youtu.be/9vJWjp8QA3E

  105. 105
    Nicole Says:

    @Nelly: He’s actually really gorgeous! Looks especially handsome when he has a bit of stubble on his face.

  106. 106
    rega Says:

    @Ada:

    no, she Looks too old or maybe too much makeup

  107. 107
    haste is waste!!!! Says:

    @tree: YES!! couldnt have said it better !this casting will mess with the imagination. theres a reason dakota was never cast before as an innocent- she DOESNT LOOK THHE PART!!. many ppl feel the same way. they’ve turned peoplel off with the casting. theyre so busy wanting to make the movie and get it out to theatres before ppl “lose interest” theyve forgotten one of the most important things. ELJ MAKES NOTE OF THEIR LOOKS EVERY CHANCE SHE GETS IN THE BOOK. THIS WAS A HUGE PART OF THE ATTRACTION TO THE BOOKS!! YOU CANT OVERLOOK THAT-AT ALL!! AND THEY DID!! incredibly bad casting dakota.

  108. 108
    they're desperate!! Says:

    they’re tryin so hard with her. hence the word “TRYIN” ..it aint happenin, she flew under the radar bec when she was anounced as anastasia, people were more focused on charlie and who would be CTG. she looks way too old, has not a shred of innocence to her look and doesnt look anything like anastasia!! they cant hide behind the “its not only the looks when casting” bec IN THIS CASE, WITH THIS TRILOGY, IT IS A HUGE PART!!!! they settled and failed miserably casting dakota!

  109. 109
    jane Says:

    a great production team would’ve searched high and lo and everywhere in between for a great cast, NOT SETTLED for 2nd, in this case, last best! its the worst casting. they dont get it. all they see is dollar signs and dont give a sh*t about the artistry nor the fans. dana brunetti said “many actors they approached didnt want the roles for various reasons”. then get your A$$ in gear and search the world over-LITERALLY! for the perfect pair. they were in such a hurry for fear of fans losing interest, they did exactly that by choosing the cast they did. this isnt the twilight series. the characters in FSOG werent just mentioned they became a HUGE part of the books success. dakota couldnt be further from the anna described in the book!horrible choice!!!

  110. 110
    jeb Says:

    All the actors they asked wanted NO part in this debacle production. this production team only cares about filling their personal pockets and dont give a sh*t about the fans!!! they cant be this stupid and not see what most fans see —>you CAN’T NEGATE the characters look in the book when making a movie especially when the author decribes their looks over and over and over again !! they’re trying so hard to sell dakota but take a good look at all the polls and blogs, comments etc – its unanimously agreed MOST fans thin ,the casting is horrid, especially dakota!!

  111. 111
    ray Says:

    no wonder so many fans are losing interest! bottom line. they FAILED. you can’t hide a bad script (two writers added to fix the original script) ,,,the producers have no idea what women want, the casting director is pathetic- the casting is a debacle!,,,the director clearlyhired and based anna on *herself* as dakota looks identical to her (the director) NOT the character described a million times in the trilogy (pathetic) and the studio is just dying for the cash flow..its sad bec this could’ve been great but you CANNOT use an actress that most ALL fans are utterly against and think shes going to be a good protaginst to the telling of the story. this film will make them the money they want only bec of the built in audience but it will NOT be a good CALIBER movie.–the whole production team went from being respected to laughable and quite frankly.. pathetic!!!!

  112. 112
    kate Says:

    the built in audience has already lost interest since the (horrible) cast was announced. many of the blogs, and twiiter accounts have been put off completely. the people that go see the first movie will have to suffer thru dakota as anna, they will not go for the 2nd and 3rd.(they dont get how much people are against dakota for anna-this is not twilight, this is FSOG, where the characters are described intricately chapter by chapter) this will not be a successful franchise. their greed will backfire on them, and its already showing!

  113. 113
    no to dakota! Says:

    horrible casting! it all starts from the top- they hired two producers, an arrogant moron and a **** who’s married to a “bachelor’ show contestant, dana brunshmucky and michael de stupica. they have no idea what women want nor do they care! all they see is $$$$. they dont give a sh*t about the artistry nor the fans. team 50- what a sad bunch!

  114. 114
    Dana Says:

    What’s wrong with her elbow- photoshop gone wrong??

  115. 115
    Dana Says:

    What’s wrong with her elbow- photoshop went wrong?

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here