Top Stories

Woody Allen Responds One Last Time to Dylan Farrow's Sexual Molestation Accusations

Woody Allen Responds One Last Time to Dylan Farrow's Sexual Molestation Accusations

Woody Allen has written an op-ed for the New York Times where he tells his entire version of what his story against the allegations that he sexually abused his daughter Dylan Farrow.

Mia [Farrow] insisted that I had abused Dylan and took her immediately to a doctor to be examined. Dylan told the doctor she had not been molested,” the 78-year-old director wrote. “Mia then took Dylan out for ice cream, and when she came back with her the child had changed her story.”

“Not that I doubt Dylan hasn’t come to believe she’s been molested, but if from the age of 7 a vulnerable child is taught by a strong mother to hate her father because he is a monster who abused her, is it so inconceivable that after many years of this indoctrination the image of me Mia wanted to establish had taken root?” Woody added.

“Of course, I did not molest Dylan. I loved her and hope one day she will grasp how she has been cheated out of having a loving father and exploited by a mother more interested in her own festering anger than her daughter’s well-being,” Woody continued.

In the letter, Woody says this will be his final word on the subject. He also discusses the very controversial topic involving Ronan Farrow‘s real biological father – him or Frank Sinatra.

Click inside to read the letter in its entirety…

TWENTY-ONE years ago, when I first heard Mia Farrow had accused me of child molestation, I found the idea so ludicrous I didn’t give it a second thought. We were involved in a terribly acrimonious breakup, with great enmity between us and a custody battle slowly gathering energy. The self-serving transparency of her malevolence seemed so obvious I didn’t even hire a lawyer to defend myself. It was my show business attorney who told me she was bringing the accusation to the police and I would need a criminal lawyer.

I naïvely thought the accusation would be dismissed out of hand because of course, I hadn’t molested Dylan and any rational person would see the ploy for what it was. Common sense would prevail. After all, I was a 56-year-old man who had never before (or after) been accused of child molestation. I had been going out with Mia for 12 years and never in that time did she ever suggest to me anything resembling misconduct. Now, suddenly, when I had driven up to her house in Connecticut one afternoon to visit the kids for a few hours, when I would be on my raging adversary’s home turf, with half a dozen people present, when I was in the blissful early stages of a happy new relationship with the woman I’d go on to marry — that I would pick this moment in time to embark on a career as a child molester should seem to the most skeptical mind highly unlikely. The sheer illogic of such a crazy scenario seemed to me dispositive.

Notwithstanding, Mia insisted that I had abused Dylan and took her immediately to a doctor to be examined. Dylan told the doctor she had not been molested. Mia then took Dylan out for ice cream, and when she came back with her the child had changed her story. The police began their investigation; a possible indictment hung in the balance. I very willingly took a lie-detector test and of course passed because I had nothing to hide. I asked Mia to take one and she wouldn’t. Last week a woman named Stacey Nelkin, whom I had dated many years ago, came forward to the press to tell them that when Mia and I first had our custody battle 21 years ago, Mia had wanted her to testify that she had been underage when I was dating her, despite the fact this was untrue. Stacey refused. I include this anecdote so we all know what kind of character we are dealing with here. One can imagine in learning this why she wouldn’t take a lie-detector test.

Meanwhile the Connecticut police turned for help to a special investigative unit they relied on in such cases, the Child Sexual Abuse Clinic of the Yale-New Haven Hospital. This group of impartial, experienced men and women whom the district attorney looked to for guidance as to whether to prosecute, spent months doing a meticulous investigation, interviewing everyone concerned, and checking every piece of evidence. Finally they wrote their conclusion which I quote here: “It is our expert opinion that Dylan was not sexually abused by Mr. Allen. Further, we believe that Dylan’s statements on videotape and her statements to us during our evaluation do not refer to actual events that occurred to her on August 4th, 1992… In developing our opinion we considered three hypotheses to explain Dylan’s statements. First, that Dylan’s statements were true and that Mr. Allen had sexually abused her; second, that Dylan’s statements were not true but were made up by an emotionally vulnerable child who was caught up in a disturbed family and who was responding to the stresses in the family; and third, that Dylan was coached or influenced by her mother, Ms. Farrow. While we can conclude that Dylan was not sexually abused, we can not be definite about whether the second formulation by itself or the third formulation by itself is true. We believe that it is more likely that a combination of these two formulations best explains Dylan’s allegations of sexual abuse.”

Could it be any clearer? Mr. Allen did not abuse Dylan; most likely a vulnerable, stressed-out 7-year-old was coached by Mia Farrow. This conclusion disappointed a number of people. The district attorney was champing at the bit to prosecute a celebrity case, and Justice Elliott Wilk, the custody judge, wrote a very irresponsible opinion saying when it came to the molestation, “we will probably never know what occurred.”

But we did know because it had been determined and there was no equivocation about the fact that no abuse had taken place. Justice Wilk was quite rough on me and never approved of my relationship with Soon-Yi, Mia’s adopted daughter, who was then in her early 20s. He thought of me as an older man exploiting a much younger woman, which outraged Mia as improper despite the fact she had dated a much older Frank Sinatra when she was 19. In fairness to Justice Wilk, the public felt the same dismay over Soon-Yi and myself, but despite what it looked like our feelings were authentic and we’ve been happily married for 16 years with two great kids, both adopted. (Incidentally, coming on the heels of the media circus and false accusations, Soon-Yi and I were extra carefully scrutinized by both the adoption agency and adoption courts, and everyone blessed our adoptions.)

Mia took custody of the children and we went our separate ways.

I was heartbroken. Moses was angry with me. Ronan I didn’t know well because Mia would never let me get close to him from the moment he was born and Dylan, whom I adored and was very close to and about whom Mia called my sister in a rage and said, “He took my daughter, now I’ll take his.” I never saw her again nor was I able to speak with her no matter how hard I tried. I still loved her deeply, and felt guilty that by falling in love with Soon-Yi I had put her in the position of being used as a pawn for revenge. Soon-Yi and I made countless attempts to see Dylan but Mia blocked them all, spitefully knowing how much we both loved her but totally indifferent to the pain and damage she was causing the little girl merely to appease her own vindictiveness.

Here I quote Moses Farrow, 14 at the time: “My mother drummed it into me to hate my father for tearing apart the family and sexually molesting my sister.” Moses is now 36 years old and a family therapist by profession. “Of course Woody did not molest my sister,” he said. “She loved him and looked forward to seeing him when he would visit. She never hid from him until our mother succeeded in creating the atmosphere of fear and hate towards him.” Dylan was 7, Ronan 4, and this was, according to Moses, the steady narrative year after year.

I pause here for a quick word on the Ronan situation. Is he my son or, as Mia suggests, Frank Sinatra’s? Granted, he looks a lot like Frank with the blue eyes and facial features, but if so what does this say? That all during the custody hearing Mia lied under oath and falsely represented Ronan as our son? Even if he is not Frank’s, the possibility she raises that he could be, indicates she was secretly intimate with him during our years. Not to mention all the money I paid for child support. Was I supporting Frank’s son? Again, I want to call attention to the integrity and honesty of a person who conducts her life like that.

NOW it’s 21 years later and Dylan has come forward with the accusations that the Yale experts investigated and found false. Plus a few little added creative flourishes that seem to have magically appeared during our 21-year estrangement.

Not that I doubt Dylan hasn’t come to believe she’s been molested, but if from the age of 7 a vulnerable child is taught by a strong mother to hate her father because he is a monster who abused her, is it so inconceivable that after many years of this indoctrination the image of me Mia wanted to establish had taken root? Is it any wonder the experts at Yale had picked up the maternal coaching aspect 21 years ago? Even the venue where the fabricated molestation was supposed to have taken place was poorly chosen but interesting. Mia chose the attic of her country house, a place she should have realized I’d never go to because it is a tiny, cramped, enclosed spot where one can hardly stand up and I’m a major claustrophobe. The one or two times she asked me to come in there to look at something, I did, but quickly had to run out. Undoubtedly the attic idea came to her from the Dory Previn song, “With My Daddy in the Attic.” It was on the same record as the song Dory Previn had written about Mia’s betraying their friendship by insidiously stealing her husband, André, “Beware of Young Girls.” One must ask, did Dylan even write the letter or was it at least guided by her mother? Does the letter really benefit Dylan or does it simply advance her mother’s shabby agenda? That is to hurt me with a smear. There is even a lame attempt to do professional damage by trying to involve movie stars, which smells a lot more like Mia than Dylan.

After all, if speaking out was really a necessity for Dylan, she had already spoken out months earlier in Vanity Fair. Here I quote Moses Farrow again: “Knowing that my mother often used us as pawns, I cannot trust anything that is said or written from anyone in the family.” Finally, does Mia herself really even believe I molested her daughter? Common sense must ask: Would a mother who thought her 7-year-old daughter was sexually abused by a molester (a pretty horrific crime), give consent for a film clip of her to be used to honor the molester at the Golden Globes?

Of course, I did not molest Dylan. I loved her and hope one day she will grasp how she has been cheated out of having a loving father and exploited by a mother more interested in her own festering anger than her daughter’s well-being. Being taught to hate your father and made to believe he molested you has already taken a psychological toll on this lovely young woman, and Soon-Yi and I are both hoping that one day she will understand who has really made her a victim and reconnect with us, as Moses has, in a loving, productive way. No one wants to discourage abuse victims from speaking out, but one must bear in mind that sometimes there are people who are falsely accused and that is also a terribly destructive thing. (This piece will be my final word on this entire matter and no one will be responding on my behalf to any further comments on it by any party. Enough people have been hurt.)

Like Just Jared on Facebook

JJ Links Around The Web

Jason Merritt/Getty

200 Responses to “Woody Allen Responds One Last Time to Dylan Farrow's Sexual Molestation Accusations”

Pages: « 12 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 » Show All

  1. 151
    Reba Says:

    Does anyone else think it strange he doesn’t actually deny molesting her in his statement? He never comes out and says “I did not molest my daughter.” That’s what makes me raise an eyebrow^.

  2. 152
    lol Says:

    Fade back into obscurity Dylan the souless ginger nobody. The innocent Woody Allen and his immense talent will be celebrated for decades to come ….lol.. that’s gotta hurt….you had no effect as proxy for your insane mommy….you have made yourself a joke by identifying yourself as, and being consumed by, the role of pretend victim. Pathetic loser..

  3. 153
    @reba Says:

    can you read?? the first sentence of the last paragraph says just that.

  4. 154
    Kera Says:

    I don’t believe him for a second. I believe Dylan. Also, why would you marry the girl who was adopted by your ex wife at 8 years old and who is sister to your own children and now their step-mother? That is screwed up. He is an entitled jerk who has been told for way too long how much of a genius he is. People like that think they are invincible. he is a jerk. He did it. it is very clear.

  5. 155
    Anon Survivor Says:

    I think it is awful that people think examining a child physically or even mentally will lead to an abuse discovery. Are you kidding? I was molested as a child and there were no physical scars nor would I have ever admitted to it if any had asked me at 9 years old. I was so ashamed of it. I believe Dylan and I pray that one day Karma will get Woody Allen so he can pay for what he has done. In a way, he is already paying for it. All the money in the world cannot save him from his disgusting behavior including his marriage to his wife’s adopted daughter. Dead giveaway people.

  6. 156
    Team Woody Says:

    Call him any childish name you want . Falsely accuse him of anything under the sun. Project on to him 24/7. He IS and will ALWAYS be considered a genius of film making.

  7. 157
    Big Fan Says:

    Always loved “Annie Hall” and “Manhattan”, “Love and Death” too— Classics

  8. 158
    @155 Says:

    I am sorry that happened to you but this is about Woody/Mia/Dylan and people are projecting their experience on this experience.
    Each should be examined on its own.

    Not every accusation is real.

  9. 159
    keith Says:

    The records prove she was a legal adult when the affair with Soon Yi started. Most grown older men I know would love to screw a twenty year old, but not a seven year old. You are sick and obviously your dad put his putz in your mouth. Now you see the devil in every face that is accused, see?

  10. 160
    keith Says:

    You are lying. Soon Yi was of adult age when Mia suggested Woody start taking her places, because the real stepfather wasn’t good. You need to seriously shove a piece of burning fire iron in your mouth for not getting your facts straight, jerk. Every grown man would screw a 20 year old girl. Not a seven year old.

  11. 161
    soon yi's words Says:

    pass this on to those that say he was her father

  12. 162
    Mmmmmmm Says:

    One eye open and one eye closed…..he has been stressful through the years. I wonder for what reason? Children tend to suppress memories from child hood because they cannot comprehend what transpired. This suppression of memories become evident as an adult. One can reminisce about a situation and now make sense of it!

    If a child cannot be believed, then perverts will get away with molestation!
    Listen to children! Listen to children! Listen to children! Listen to children!

  13. 163
    @162 Says:

    so glad I live in a country where innocent until proven guilty is the name of the game.

    btw: finally saw Blue Jasmine today. It was a great movie and I hope it wins.

  14. 164
    tastyjane Says:

    @samantha: Wouldn’t you be in a blind rage if your boyfriend of 12 years runs off with your daughter? I don’t blame Mia for her anger. He just keeps brining her into to deflect his guilt. I am really does anyone expect him to or another pedophile “yeah I did it” There is a serious problem in Hollywood. The stars are afraid to say anything because they want to be in his movies. It’s really sick. I think he should be charged with it.. There should be no time limits on child abuse cases. He has even said himself inmthe past nobody would be shocked if he was with 15 twelve year olds. He said it himself. No one will touchhim because they get paid off. I wish more people had balls to fight against there hollywood big wigs with their deviant acts.

  15. 165
    time to chop wood Says:

    He’s lying

  16. 166
    tastyjane Says:

    @Angela: Mia would be long over Woody by now, if she was making it up I don’t think she would ever let it be brought up again, but if itreallly happened it would not be something anyone would forget. This was only brought to light because her tormentor is being honored. I would have brought it again too. It’s like being abused again. Woody is a pervert and is a molester. I am very scared for his current children, Somebody should take those children to a child psycologist. I bet then he would get locked up.

  17. 167
    tastyjane Says:

    @@80: Well if she was lying she would have said he was to make it look worse but she didn’t. So I doubt she is lying about anything.

  18. 168
    tastyjane Says:

    @o-o: People like you are either paid off and paid to say these stupid things. Anybody looking at this objectively knows Woody is guilty and a pedophile.

  19. 169
    time to chop wood Says:

    dr leventhal lied too because they are both jewish
    i can tell who the jews are on this thread
    if woody gets the award it will confirm the jews in are dishonorable and unjust
    they can’t cover this up anymore and get away with it.

  20. 170
    tastyjane Says:

    @stella: Wow you are a disgusting human being. Woodyy and Soon yi are tthe sick losers.

  21. 171
    time to chop wood Says:

    woody’s jewish son is also a dishonest, dishonorable liar who is too closely identified and enmeshed with his father’s jewish cronies
    i bet his son has molested a few girls too.

  22. 172
    tastyjane Says:

    @she was coached: Dr Leventhal was paid off by Woody. The DA said they had enough to charge Woody but did not wnt to traumatize Dylan further.

  23. 173
    @171 Says:

    shows how much you don’t even read…
    Moses who is on woody side is not jewish.
    ronan- is the mama’s boy- he bio son (until proven otherwise with a dna test)

  24. 174
    Jubuns Says:

    Everyone who supports and believes Allan Stewart Konigsberg’s memoir of a fictional fantasy is going to be held accountable among those when his “reputation” is that of a convicted child rapist. Konigsberg is a perverted man who has made a career out of exploiting woman, crafting roles that pin them as sexualized one-trick whores, who were under his fatherly eyes every minute the camera rolled. When he is finally rotting in his grave, everyone in Hollywood will shun this man for the beast he truly is.

  25. 175
    tastyjane Says:

    @jakson: I agree his children do not look happy at all.

Pages: « 12 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 » Show All

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here