Top Stories

Kelly Rutherford Spends Time with Her Daughter Helena After More Custody Issues

Kelly Rutherford Spends Time with Her Daughter Helena After More Custody Issues

Kelly Rutherford flashes a smile while posing for photographs at the Blushington New York City Grand Opening Party at Le Parker Meridien Underground on Tuesday (July 28) in New York City.

The 46-year-old actress was accompanied by her six-year-old daughter Helena as they were treated to an evening of pampering in the Blushington makeup and beauty lounge.

PHOTOS: Check out the latest pics of Kelly Rutherford

Kelly recently released a statement about her case to regain custody of her two children Hermes, 8, and Helena with ex husband Daniel Giersch after now being denied by a New York court.

10+ pictures inside of Kelly Rutherford and her daughter Helena at the party…

Just Jared on Facebook
kelly rutherford steps out with daugther helena following custody case 01
kelly rutherford steps out with daugther helena following custody case 02
kelly rutherford steps out with daugther helena following custody case 03
kelly rutherford steps out with daugther helena following custody case 04
kelly rutherford steps out with daugther helena following custody case 05
kelly rutherford steps out with daugther helena following custody case 06
kelly rutherford steps out with daugther helena following custody case 07
kelly rutherford steps out with daugther helena following custody case 08
kelly rutherford steps out with daugther helena following custody case 09
kelly rutherford steps out with daugther helena following custody case 10

Credit: Astrid Stawiarz; Photos: Getty
Posted to: Celebrity Babies, Daniel Giersch, Helena Giersch, Kelly Rutherford

JJ Links Around The Web
  • Memorial for XXXTentacion shuts down the streets of L.A. - TMZ
  • The Kissing Booth's Jacob Elordi sends sweet message to fans - Just Jared Jr
  • Jennifer Lopez is calling out LeBron James - TooFab
  • Here's why Kevin Spacey still has a movie coming out - The Hollywood Reporter
  • This 13 Reasons Why star once had suicidal thoughts - Just Jared Jr
  • Kenneth Hollander

    As published in Psychology Today 3-13-13 letter

    Regarding Kelly Rutherford’s attorney, David J Glass PhD

    Child abuse by design

    Dear Ken ,

    It’s been more than a year since the letter of 2/12/12 and the apparent
    subsequent closing shortly thereafter of Glass Family Law. I
    understand he is now not promoting himself as uniquely blended in
    Psychology and Law but is at another firm doing probate work.
    Interestingly enough his resume at FMBK Law has claims of credentials
    I understand you believe are false based upon you direct written
    response from organizations Mr. Glass claims to be a member or
    associated with. Who does that reflect upon him or the diligence and
    propriety of the firm which now employs him?

    It occurred to me that the complete contrast in our cases is almost
    deafening in the way it shouts hypocrisy, maleficent practices, and
    flat out perjuries within statements written under penalty of perjury
    and oral statements within hearings and written statements within
    submitted briefs screams of the manipulation of parents. This IMHO by
    attorney’s, the bench and minor’s councils within the family
    court system in CA at least. Given I was asked to waive my Fifth
    Amendment Rights in family court? And did so .The issuance of
    restraining orders on both of us within 3 weeks of my letter of the
    12 of February under quote Justice Convey in your instance (“by the
    slimmest of margins”)one has to wonder at the coincidence…Right?
    Of course I was judged as having stalked by proxy because I hired a
    PI to prove my daughter was being housed with a felon (cultivating
    under a Federal Indictment),,, and the mother knew it.

    Indeed in your instance you were
    falsely accused of molestation by the mother of your son seven ( 7)
    times and then of stalking (8th)when the child was too old to falsely
    accuse the father of abuse .I note your minors council never
    interviewed your child even though Sammy was ten (10) . In your case
    no abuse took place yet you were put on monitored visitation and
    visitation reduced to police station pick-ups permanently. It would
    seem logical Ken that at some time you become a safe parent. When is
    that after your four (4th) parenting class? Or after the third 3rd
    interview with the District Attorney’s Office. How about after the
    8th sheriff or 13th DCFS investigations. What grade gives you a pass?
    Or is it like our friend who ponied up a Million dollars.

    In my case I alleged that the mother was negligent or deliberately sub
    parenting in a manner as was provocative .Lj was taken to UCLA med
    center at three & half (3 ½) .and on morphine and intravenous
    feeding for 6 weeks after the neighbors call the police because they
    could hear her screaming. I had previously stated the mother did not
    have the skills or empathy and may have been suffering some mental

    two (2) years later numerous blood noses (daddy don’t put sunscreen
    on …its very sore) and Minors counsel accused me of overreacting
    etc. Yet my daughter now is showing a scar across her nose as her
    face has grown. Also when the symptoms that caused the first
    hospitalization reoccurred I took Lj to the Doctor without custodial
    privileges and was again accused of being alarmist yet the child’s
    diet was immediately changed by the mother and things improved.

    Not forgetting being accused of 10K in support arrears that the judge
    threw out as falsified spreadsheet CSSD said I never owed anything.
    As well as the LCSW saying the Mothers accusation I yelled at our
    daughter and threw a phone at her was a work of fiction. Perhaps that
    is why we have a letter from the Bar suggesting we pursue “civil

    Given all this I am the one who is separated and monitored.

    My point is you are not a molester as the DA stated yet you are
    punished and to the opposite I can prove the mother has been ,may
    still be or is a least using sub care of my child in a provocative
    manner where my child may be suffering yet I am punished,. Quote
    (LCFS,,‘ The Mother is not currently negligent”)


    Finally we have our friend who only after paying a million dollars was taken
    of monitoring, all accusations and interference stopped and can see
    his children when he wants.

    is the situation Given the violence in society killings in families,
    how much damage has been done to children and women, mothers Fathers
    parents and extended family by the propagation of this kind of
    duplicitous behavior within what seems to be a culture of deceit
    built around self-aggrandizing and financial self-serving that in
    fact amounts to fiscal abuse of children. What training skills and so
    on are lost in funneling the parent’s income to third party leeches
    using false or manipulated circumstances to serve their own

    my case I spent more than $ 47,072 seeing my daughter for twelve (
    12) hours each month for the last year.

    kept my second residence in California, (rent) paid child support,
    Airfare from NY once a month air fare for a weekend from oversees
    and monitor costs including the monitors meals , go-cart rides,
    Taxis/transportation , lunches, entertainment, getting around,
    clothes, toys, books & games and adventures that I as her father
    are able to spend upon the daughter that I have raised!

    What type of enhanced opportunities could a different approach have made?

    If fathers are the enemy what will mothers become once a more robotic
    agenda is achieved .They will be phased out as well. Women should
    consider the short amount of time science is giving them to make the
    correct adjustments to this situation and police their own ranks from
    peers lawyers and malevolent individuals who care little for
    children, and will eventually throw mothers to the wayside in
    preference of the state. I mean do little girls really need to be
    born with a womb anymore?

    The societal cost of the emotional and mental anguish to children and
    subsequent family killings from person caught up in this situations
    is surely not worth the salaries of a the firms and government
    agencies who benefit from this culture…>All mothers, children
    and Fathers are at risk and more so daily as those uneducated to the
    manner they will be manipulated and have their conflict orchestrated
    to the fiscal advantage of others.

    My being asked to waive my 5th in family court because a stated somebody
    was a dead man walking, professionally speaking .It would seem I know
    what I’m doing as David J. Glass Ph.D. is now hobbled from abusing
    any more families and a judge who asks me if I wished merry Christmas
    to a Jewish Lawyer as a hateful gesture seems to be setting me up for
    something, especially since you had received notices mailed to your
    residence disclosing that David Glass would be on vacation during the
    “Christmas holidays”.

    Yet you Ken are a longtime Jewish friend and my father spent weeks in a
    cattle car on his way to Stalag IVIII in Poland.

    Was it not the Nazis who first separated children from parents?

    And then when I request the transcript from that hearing, I pay for it I
    and then get not the original but a copy and my money order is handed
    back to me and no one will say who was given the original?

    says to me at age of 6 when I tell her mom loves her and will always
    be in her life

    state’s to me …“She’s going to live a lot; she’s never
    going to die?”

    What is this child going to hold her mother responsible for and by what
    means will she do so?

    The enabling of conflict by those who seek to gain financially is simply
    evil and no different from an arms dealer who supplies both sides
    .The killing of life be it on an emotional ,intellectual, financial,
    mental, spiritual and /a or physical level is a death and no
    different from actually using a mechanical device. Too knowingly do
    so to children whose spirit is pure is inherently foul.

    To surmise IMHO the individuals and associated firms in our cases are
    only the tip of the iceberg.

    Michael J Kretzmer. David J.Glass Ph.d, Lori A. Darakjian, Elise Greenberg of
    Carlson & Greenberg, Psychologist Angus Strachan Ph.d of Lund &
    Strachan ,FMBK Law , Kolodny & Anteau represent a blight upon
    what was once a noble profession .

    Please get back to me with your thoughts, I am thinking about copying this
    letter and the letter of 2-12-2012 to the California Attorney