Top Stories

Louis Tomlinson Responds to Risqué Danielle Campbell Photos

Louis Tomlinson Responds to Risqué Danielle Campbell Photos

Louis Tomlinson has taken to social media to speak out against paparazzi photos taken of his girlfriend Danielle Campbell.

The pictures, which were published by TMZ, show the 24-year-old One Direction singer helping the 21-year-old Originals actress take off her bikini top by the pool as they vacationed in Cabo San Luas, Mexcio.

“The privacy laws are fucked up 😡” Louis tweeted.

Danielle hasn’t responded to the photos, but did post a gorgeous Instagram pic of her oceanside view with the caption, “Happy place 😊🌊🐬”

Just Jared on Facebook
Photos: Getty
Posted to: Danielle Campbell, Louis Tomlinson

JJ Links Around The Web

Getty
  • Hell’s Bells

    So, they really thought that Louis, a guy in One Direction could just have his girlfriend topless outside and no one would take pictures…. Because privacy? Even if it is private property, come on. Are they dumb or just really wanted the attention?

  • Hell’s Bells

    Never mind. Just saw the pictures.

    So gay.

  • Gina

    She was looking right into the camera the entire time, they knew exactly what they were doing.

  • Gina

    Even Stevie Wonder could see it.

  • UGH!!!!!!

    they couldn’t see the camera’s……….. just because they were “looking” right into them means nothing. the camera people we posted MILES away. they used a lens where you can zoom in reallllllllly close from far away….. so don’t go trying to justify any of this. that is an invation of privacy and they have every right to be angry about it.

  • Gina

    Listen honey, celebs do this all the time. They looked in the general direction of the cameras. Just like Bieber did with his “accidental” penis shots. You’d be surprised the lengths people go to. To some people, all publicity is good publicity. This isn’t the first time this couple has stunted for the cameras and the fans have picked up on it. So don’t you dare get self-righteous with me.

  • Will

    No one believes for one second she didn’t know, here’s a thought keep your top on until your indoors.

  • kelly

    Typical victim blaming. Real nice coming from another woman. Let me guess, a girl wearing a short skirt is “asking to get raped” as well.

  • kelly

    Actually many people believe that, because she likely didn’t. But keep victim blaming. Looks good on you.

  • Gina

    Are you f*cking kidding me? Louis is just as disgusting. He participated in this mess. This isn’t the first time the boys of One Direction disrespected their “girlfriends” in front of the paps. Liam gave his supposed girlfriend at the time a wedgie in front of the paps and tweeted and laughed about it. I feel like their management team is making them do these stunts & all parties involved are disgusting for participating.

  • SarahNicole

    I’m going to take a hunch, you’re a Larry shipper aren’t you? I highly doubt Louis and Danielle knew they were being papped. The lens are so far away due to blurry photos, them looking at the ocean the boat is probably a speck to them. So, I don’t see how you think Danielle took her top off on purpose knowing she was being watched. If I was her, I’d be pissed if I saw topless photos of me all over the internet. They were on a private property villa, the villa was on a cliff above the ocean, so no, they were looking at the ocean NOT the camera.

  • Gina

    First of all, I don’t “ship” anything. So your hunch is wrong and you’re just looking for an excuse to write off my opinion. Second, they were on private property, which is all the more reason for me to believe that the paps were deliberately called. Blurry pictures are a tired tactic used by celebs to pass off staged photos as real. Stop being so damn gullible. Lastly, all of those nude pictures were censored, there is not a single NSFW picture online, which means she/they arranged for these pictures to be taken and she negotiated with the paps to censor the pictures before releasing them. Most paps don’t have that kind of integrity or decency to censor nude pictures unless there was some sort of arrangement in advance. Open your eyes.

  • SarahNicole

    Gina, everything you say is really dumb. Why on earth would Danielle and Louis be happy waking up one morning seeing topless photos of her and private moments of her and Louis all over the internet? That’s an invasion of privacy. Paps violating her like that is just wrong. I’m not the one gullible to believe paps were hired by Louis and Danielle to take their photos. Btw, DM just took down the story/photos of Danielle and Louis’ private vacation. Paps are disgusting and rude.

  • Gina

    SarahNicole, you’re willfully ignorant. It’s not a good look. Learn to question things around you and not take them at face value. Once again, the paps were called. I already explained why. ALL the nude pics of her are censored, not a single NSFW pic exists online. A pap wouldn’t give that courtesy unless there was some arrangement made in advance. Usually when a celeb is photographed naked, there is ALWAYS some sleazy site that has the uncensored pics. Those 1d fans that you made fun of would make for good investigators because they discovered that not a single uncensored pic of her exists online. If a pap took pictures on private property without permission, do you really think they would be kind enough to censor the pics? This means that the paps censored them before they distributed them to the public. This implies that there was an arrangement made. The fact that it was private property gives more credence to my belief that the paps were invited there. The end.

  • SarahNicole

    I don’t care what the hell you say. Believe all fake BS media you want, I still think it was an invasion of privacy of the photos to be taken when they wanted PRIVACY and it was a violation of Danielle’s privacy, it’s pretty obvious that media doesn’t have a care in the world for people’s privacy. Do you seriously think Danielle is happy to see topless photos of her all over the internet? There are rude fans have been “sl*t shamming” her. Those paps had NO right to be violating hers and Louis mostly Danielle’s privacy. For crying out loud, just because they were looking straight into the camera doesn’t mean the camera was right there in their vision, they were looking at the ocean, they were on a damn cliff. Do you have any idea how far cameras can zoom in from being incredibly far away. I’m right you’re wrong. So, goodbye.

  • Gina

    Enough with the hysterics and the righteous indignation. My comments clearly went over your damn head. I already gave a rebuttal to every weak point you made in your little rant. It was staged. The end.

  • SarahNicole

    I read what you said, I’m not blind. I really don’t give a sh*t anymore because you think this was “staged”… Okay, how about if ever become famous, you go on a private vacation not wanting anyone to know your location with your future husband/boyfriend and the next morning you see photos of your privacy all over the internet. If you seriously think this was “staged” and Danielle intentionally took her top off, you’re delusional. Look up amazing camera zooms, that sh*t goes so far, no one knows they’re being filmed or photographed.

  • Gina

    Blah, blah, blah. You are a broken record of bullsh*t and delusion. Have fun being blissfully ignorant. Gullible people like you are why stunts like this work. Congratulations, you played yourself.

  • SarahNicole

    You know what, I don’t usually use cuss words on people I don’t even know or care to know when they are being so stupid because it’s rude to call people cruel names you don’t even know online, but your comments are incredibly annoying AF, so f*uck you and your stupid “staged” sh*t.. No one should waste their time talking to you because all you’re going to say is everyone’s “gullible” “ignorant” and “delusional” don’t even comment back because I’m so tired of listening to you.

  • kelly

    Oh, you know them personally, do you? Take your negativity and your hateful comments somewhere else. Unless they told you that themselves, quit believing the worst in everyone.

  • kelly

    Exactly!! Gina is clearly a crazy Larry shipper so just ignore her.

  • Gina

    Don’t need to know them personally to have common sense and the ability to be perceptive. You should try it sometime, sweetie.

  • Gina

    Oh trust me, I am gonna comment when you come at me with some bullsh*t. Don’t get pissy with me just because I’m not saying what your simple-minded ass wants to hear. Have a seat, little girl.

  • kelly

    Actually “sweetie”, unless you know them personally or they spoke to you about it themselves, you don’t know. Take a hike, hater.

  • SarahNicole

    Says she’s not, she clearly is. And her added to an argument I ended, it’s perfectly clear who the “Little Girl” is.

  • SarahNicole

    Adding on to an argument I ended, huh? It’s perfectly clear we both know who the “little girl” is and, honey, it’s not me.

  • Gina

    Little girl, if you truly “ended” the argument, you wouldn’t still be responding now. You’re not too bright, honey.

  • Gina

    Well sweetie, apply that sentiment to yourself. You don’t know them either, and yet you swear you know what their intentions are, and you defend them to within an inch of your life. Hypocrite much? (You upvoted my comment earlier, so clearly you agreed with me lol).

  • SarahNicole

    You’re the one adding one. “Have a seat, little girl” as if you’re ready for more sh*t to come, because that’s exactly what a naïve little girl does, they don’t give up. I’m going to take a wild guess that you’re at least 10 years old? If you are, I’m 15 years older than you.

  • Gina

    You MUST be describing yourself, you hypocrite. You act like a damn clueless child. I’m embarrassed for you. What I should’ve said, was ‘have a seat at the children’s table’ because that’s where you dumb ass belongs.

  • kelly

    It’s called seeing the GOOD in people, instead of victim-blaming. So like I said before, unless you know them personally or what their motives are, maybe try being on their side instead of throwing them under the bus. Sure as hell hope you don’t call yourself a Louis Tomlinson fan.

  • Gina

    Oh, please. It’s called seeing past the facade. You should try it sometime instead of living up Louis’ ass. I actually blame his management team for making him do these disgusting stunts more than I blame him. I feel sorry that he’s living a lie. If you were a fan, you’d try to find out who he really is instead of believing the lies spun by the media. It’s pathetic.

  • kelly

    Ohhhh you’re a Larry. It all makes sense now.

  • Gina

    Lmao, now you’re just sounding desperate because you have no rebuttal.

  • kelly

    No. It’s called not wasting my time on someone who fantasizes about two men who will never be together. Time to grow up and quit worrying about others relationships.

  • Gina

    Not wasting your time and yet you still respond to me 6 days later when I’ve practically forgotten about your desperate ass? Btw, who’s fantasizing about two guys? You probably want Louis to be straight so that he can get with you someday, huh? Keep dreamin’ you homophobe.

  • kelly

    Lollllllll sorry I don’t sit on my computer all day checking for comments. You are 100% a Larry because you whipped out the whole invalid ‘homophobe’ argument. Someday you’ll grow up and realize ‘Wow I can’t believe I spent so much time fantasizing about a relationship that never happened. How embarassing”. Don’t worry, you’ll get there someday. Goodbye troll… Head on back under your bridge now.

  • Gina

    Ahh, you poor naive little bitch baby. Trying to deflect I see. It ain’t gonna work darling. You’re the one fantasizing about Danielle and Louis. Two people who don’t give a damn about you or know you exist. It’s kinda creepy and trollish. You can call me a “Larry” all you want if that helps your desperate ass sleep at night, but people who aren’t even fans of the band can see that your boy likes penis.

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here