Top Stories

Justin Theroux Returns to Social Media After Jennifer Aniston Split

Justin Theroux Returns to Social Media After Jennifer Aniston Split

Justin Theroux has returned to Instagram after news broke that he and Jennifer Aniston decided to separate.

The 46-year-old actor posted an update about a visit to a no kill animal shelter in Austin, Texas, Austin Pets Alive.

“Texas!!! ⭐️ Another very inspiring visit with the incredible people and pups @austinpetsalive. I cannot understand how they do what they do, day after day, so consistently and lovingly to save so many dogs and cats. I HIGHLY recommend going in and getting your nose bit by a toothless baby pitbull. Thes two aren’t yet ready to go, but when they are go get em…🐢🐾 Oh! And hey Houston! You have a Pets Alive no kill shelter there too! @houstonpetsalive Thank you APA!,” Justin wrote, along with a series of photos of him with some of the animals.

A post shared by @justintheroux on

Just Jared on Facebook
Photos: Getty
Posted to: Justin Theroux

JJ Links Around The Web

Getty
  • Jack Osbourne and his wife Lisa are sticking for their family after divorce news - TMZ
  • Taylor Swift's cats had the best reaction to being in Deadpool - Just Jared Jr
  • Two American Idol finalists are dating - TooFab
  • Charlize Theron is taking on the role of Megyn Kelly - The Hollywood Reporter
  • Descendants 3 has announced its final cast - Just Jared Jr
  • GroundControl500

    Oy vey. This guy’s a pit nutter. These “no kill” shelters are very irresponsible. There are, in fact, some dogs that are too risky to adopt out and need to be put down. That may be sad but that is reality. This particular shelter is run by people who refuse to acknowledge the inherent genetic traits of pit bulls and are part and parcel of the pit bull lobby.

  • Stoni

    Do you even own a pitbull? If not your opinion is worthless!

  • Stoni

    I REALLY like him now that I know he’s an animal advocate! Those are the BEST kind of people!

  • Stoni

    I REALLY like him now that I know he’s an animal advocate! Those are the BEST kind of people!

  • GroundControl500

    Why would you have to own one to know and understand the reality of their genetic make up and their history?

    The surgeons who warn that children should be kept away from pits don’t need to own one to know what horrendous injuries and deaths they cause.

    Pit defenders are a separate kind of fool.

  • GroundControl500

    Why would you have to own one to know and understand the reality of their genetic make up and their history?

    The surgeons who warn that children should be kept away from pits don’t need to own one to know what horrendous injuries and deaths they cause.

    Pit defenders are a separate kind of fool.

  • Stoni

    You are just another uneducated idiot. Rottweilers and German Shepherds also have bite cases so do poodles and cocker spaniels. Pit bulls are aggressive only when they have loser owners, that is the same for all dogs. You really too stupid to know that?

  • Stoni

    You are just another uneducated idiot. Rottweilers and German Shepherds also have bite cases so do poodles and cocker spaniels. Pit bulls are aggressive only when they have loser owners, that is the same for all dogs. You really too stupid to know that?

  • GroundControl500

    Are you being deliberately obtuse or just reading some pit lobby meme?

    I am thoroughly educated and informed as to pit bull injuries. You on the other hand seem to be living in lala land.

    This is NOT about bites. It is about maulings and life altering injuries and DEATHS. There is no denying the stats. Rotts are way behind pits in serious injuries and GSDs are even further behind. They don’t even come close. A bite and release can be dealt with, a pit bite and mauling and refusal to release until the death of the victim or the pit bull is on another planet.

    You need to get educated before your foolishness causes death or serious injury.

  • Stoni

    If a pit is raised right they won’t attack. Abused pits attack and under those circumstances I have NO sympathy for the human victim. The real victim is the pit. Quit spreading lies about pits. I hope people are smarter than you.

  • Stoni

    My advice to you is never go near a pit. They can sense stupid, afraid imbeciles.

  • GroundControl500

    I’m sorry, dear, but there are too many incidents of pits lovingly raised from puppyhood by responsible owners which suddenly turn on and attack. Attack their owners, the owners’ children they have been raised with and neighbors. Nobody should have to be subjected to the unpredicatable danger of pits.

    You can bury your head in the sand and try to deny their genetics all you want – it won’t change a thing. It is the genetic make up of this breed that governs its behavior. You cannot love out, train out, or hug out an animal’s true genetics. Simple as that. It is dangerous to ignore science.

  • Stoni

    You are just a follower. Have fun on the bandwagon.

  • corina70

    When is the announcement of Jamie Dornan’s coming JJ? We know his ended forever ago…

    JT looks relieve and happy I can’t imagine x100000 Jamie will be finally publicly!

  • Stoni

    What is going on with Jamie Dornan? JJ?

  • GroundControl500

    You’re just a victim waiting to happen. Have fun in the hospital.

  • Stoni

    I will take my chances. It will be worth it. Are you scared of everything? Or just dogs? Do you drive? Fly? I would hate to live like you…in fear.

  • Julieveggie

    Dr. Golinko, who completed the largest dog bite study to date, states pit bulls are a danger to children. http://nationalpitbullvictimawareness.org/expert-opinions/

  • Lillie Ochoa


    Google is paying to people of each age $97 per-hour to do easy tasks onnet . Labor Some only few hours daily & fun greater time with your circle of relatives … Anyone can also avail this best career!!last Sunday I bought a brand new Car after just earning $15422 past month .without any doubt it is my favourite-job but you may not forgive yourself if you do not have a peek at it.!sh273v:➬➬➬ http://GoogleWikiMakeMoneyOnTheInternet/get/pay/$97/hr… β™₯β™₯β™₯wβ™₯sβ™₯dβ™₯β™₯qβ™₯rβ™₯oβ™₯β™₯β™₯fβ™₯mβ™₯β™₯hβ™₯β™₯β™₯tβ™₯β™₯β™₯hβ™₯β™₯qβ™₯β™₯tβ™₯β™₯bβ™₯β™₯aβ™₯β™₯β™₯hβ™₯β™₯β™₯rβ™₯β™₯β™₯fβ™₯uβ™₯rβ™₯β™₯gβ™₯β™₯β™₯fβ™₯jβ™₯lβ™₯β™₯j::::::::!lh111z:tnaur

  • Marisa Nordstrom

    Dogsbite.org – spend some time there, read the cases, look at the pictures (the killer dogs [ all breeds], the dead people, the variety of pit cultists). Pit bulls kill more than all breeds combined for all times. The pit cultists attack this credible, award-winning site and malign it and lie about it… so you go read the stories for yourself. And that covers only the fatalities. The people that spend the rest of their lives with amputated limbs, grotesque disfiguring injuries, ears and scalps ripped off, their vocation becomes seeing doctors for the rest of their lives — those millions of cases you need to read about at other sites that don’t promote pitty-the-pit propaganda and lie about pit bull brutal maulings.

  • Kyle Lytton Schwerin

    Keep hiding then you hateful, closeminded c@nt.

  • Kyle Lytton Schwerin

    Keep spreading the hate you stupid, uneducated bitch, have you ever even been near one of these dogs? Or are you just going by the media reports….?

  • Kyle Lytton Schwerin

    Cunt

  • Kyle Lytton Schwerin

    CUNT

  • Kyle Lytton Schwerin

    I agree, all these fearful people have no clue to the real demeanor of these breeds, fuck them.

  • GroundControl500

    LOL! Is that all you got? Ignoring the reality of animal behavioral science is about as dumb as you can get. Let’s just hope you don’t let your ignorance of pits place others at risk.

  • GroundControl500

    The pit nutters have arrived with their foaming at the mouth defense. There is a reason why the shelters are chock full of surrendered pits. Some people never learn just how dangerously unpredictable they are until they are personally affected by a pit attack – until then they will blindly ignore the reality and genetics of these dogs dressing them in tutus and being fooled by their wagging tails and “pibble kisses”.

    I don’t even care anymore when a pit kills or maims its owner. They should have known not to trust it. It’s when their children or neighbors are killed or maimed for life that angers me. There is no pill for stubborn stupidity.

  • GroundControl500

    Ah, the level of intelligence one comes to expect from pit defenders. There it is. πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

  • GroundControl500

    That anger isn’t going to help you when some previously loving pit suddenly turns on. I hope you have a gun.

  • MyName

    Pit bulls used to be used as substitute nannies. Helen Keller even had one. It isn’t the breed that’s the problem it’s the idiot humans who train specific ones as they do.

  • MyName

    Some of various breeds cannot be adopted out do to what they’ve been taught and/or the abuse they’ve been subjected to and thus are too easy to act out. Those animals shouldn’t be in family homes but experienced and well caring handlers can care for them on site.
    The answer is to try to stop as many of the abusers as possible and breeders in general so people can care for those already here.

  • MyName

    Facts: http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/pitbulls-used-be-considered-perfect-nanny-dogs-children-until-media-turned-them

    and

    Facts: http://www.adoptapet.com/blog/for-over-100-years-pitbulls-were-our-babysitters/#.Wpb249QrJQI

    I understand it’s human nature not to want to admit that you were wrong. Maybe though you won’t respond too quickly in the future.

  • GroundControl500

    Sorry but that is Pit Bull Lobby Lie #1. Pit bulls were never ever ever substitute nannies. That is some foolishness the pit lobby came up with in the recent past. Even pit advocates have acknowledged that is a lie.

    Unless they were used to cull too big families. πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

    ETA no one trains pit bulls to maim or kill their own children.

  • GroundControl500

    Sorry but that is Pit Bull Lobby Lie #1. Pit bulls were never ever ever substitute nannies. That is some foolishness the pit lobby came up with in the recent past. Even pit advocates have acknowledged that is a lie.

    Unless they were used to cull too big families. πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

    ETA no one trains pit bulls to maim or kill their own children.

  • GroundControl500

    Sorry but that is Pit Bull Lobby Lie #1. Pit bulls were never ever ever substitute nannies. That is some foolishness the pit lobby came up with in the recent past. Even pit advocates have acknowledged that is a lie.

    Unless they were used to cull too big families. πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

    ETA no one trains pit bulls to maim or kill their own children.

  • GroundControl500

    Sorry but that is Pit Bull Lobby Lie #1. Pit bulls were never ever ever substitute nannies. That is some foolishness the pit lobby came up with in the recent past. Even pit advocates have acknowledged that is a lie.

    Unless they were used to cull too big families. πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

    ETA no one trains pit bulls to maim or kill their own children.

  • GroundControl500

    Sorry but that is Pit Bull Lobby Lie #1. Pit bulls were never ever ever substitute nannies. That is some foolishness the pit lobby came up with in the recent past. Even pit advocates have acknowledged that is a lie.

    Unless they were used to cull too big families. πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

    ETA no one trains pit bulls to maim or kill their own children.

  • GroundControl500

    Sorry but that is Pit Bull Lobby Lie #1. Pit bulls were never ever ever substitute nannies. That is some foolishness the pit lobby came up with in the recent past. Even pit advocates have acknowledged that is a lie.

    Unless they were used to cull too big families. πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

    ETA no one trains pit bulls to maim or kill their own children.

  • GroundControl500

    Sorry but that is Pit Bull Lobby Lie #1. Pit bulls were never ever ever substitute nannies. That is some foolishness the pit lobby came up with in the recent past. Even pit advocates have acknowledged that is a lie.

    Unless they were used to cull too big families. πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

    ETA no one trains pit bulls to maim or kill their own children.

  • GroundControl500

    Sorry but that is Pit Bull Lobby Lie #1. Pit bulls were never ever ever substitute nannies. That is some foolishness the pit lobby came up with in the recent past. Even pit advocates have acknowledged that is a lie.

    Unless they were used to cull too big families. πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

    ETA no one trains pit bulls to maim or kill their own children.

  • GroundControl500

    Sorry but that is Pit Bull Lobby Lie #1. Pit bulls were never ever ever substitute nannies. That is some foolishness the pit lobby came up with in the recent past. Even pit advocates have acknowledged that is a lie.

    Unless they were used to cull too big families. πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

    ETA no one trains pit bulls to maim or kill their own children.

  • GroundControl500

    Sorry but that is Pit Bull Lobby Lie #1. Pit bulls were never ever ever substitute nannies. That is some foolishness the pit lobby came up with in the recent past. Even pit advocates have acknowledged that is a lie.

    Unless they were used to cull too big families. πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

    ETA no one trains pit bulls to maim or kill their own children.

  • GroundControl500

    Sadly the genetic history of pit bull and their mixes needs to be erased and it hasn’t. They were bred to be aggressive and to hide their aggression so normal dog language is not in their wheelhouse. Why do you think they were chosen by dog fighters? This is hundreds of years of breeding and not some recent breeding aberration.

    True animal lovers should not be defending a dog that kills tens of thousands of other animals a year. Think about that. Those other dog and animal lives matter, too.

  • GroundControl500

    I am not wrong. I can look at facts and statistics and historical documentation and understand what a dangerous breed is. Stop reading pit bull lobby memes.

    That first link is to a bunch of hogwash and misinformation. The pit bull lobby is very well funded and it has spread its deliberate misinformation far and wide. As I mentioned pit bulls were never nanny dogs – that is a recent invention by the pit lobby – even pit advocates have had to admit that. There is absolutely no credible historical evidence of that claim. The National Canine Research Center is owned and part and parcel of the biggest pit bull lobby around, the Animal Farm Foundation. Their bias and agenda is obvious.

    And we don’t need another outdated article that cites ATTS. The ATTS test was devised for Schutzhund enthusiasts and for police work. It has no meaning in determining anything but how bold and aggressive a dog is – obviously good traits for certain types of working line exercises and police work. You mistake the ATTS as something that can help you determine whether a dog should be a pet. It was not designed for that. And now it is just some commercial thing like the useless good canine certificate.

    These are dangerous dogs that were bred for sudden aggression. Their power makes them capable and prone to unprovoked devastating and/or fatal attacks on both humans and other animals. Many lovingly raised and properly trained pits suddenly turn on their owner. Plenty of breeds have sadly been abused and they do not exhibit pit behavior.

    I have no dog in this fight, no pun intended.

  • GroundControl500

    I am not wrong. I can look at facts and statistics and historical documentation and understand what a dangerous breed is. Stop reading pit bull lobby memes.

    That first link is to a bunch of hogwash and misinformation. The pit bull lobby is very well funded and it has spread its deliberate misinformation far and wide. As I mentioned pit bulls were never nanny dogs – that is a recent invention by the pit lobby – even pit advocates have had to admit that. There is absolutely no credible historical evidence of that claim. The National Canine Research Center is owned and part and parcel of the biggest pit bull lobby around, the Animal Farm Foundation. Their bias and agenda is obvious.

    And we don’t need another outdated article that cites ATTS. The ATTS test was devised for Schutzhund enthusiasts and for police work. It has no meaning in determining anything but how bold and aggressive a dog is – obviously good traits for certain types of working line exercises and police work. You mistake the ATTS as something that can help you determine whether a dog should be a pet. It was not designed for that. And now it is just some commercial thing like the useless good canine certificate.

    These are dangerous dogs that were bred for sudden aggression. Their power makes them capable and prone to unprovoked devastating and/or fatal attacks on both humans and other animals. Many lovingly raised and properly trained pits suddenly turn on their owner. Plenty of breeds have sadly been abused and they do not exhibit pit behavior.

    I have no dog in this fight, no pun intended.

  • GroundControl500

    I am not wrong. I can look at facts and statistics and historical documentation and understand what a dangerous breed is. Stop reading pit bull lobby memes.

    That first link is to a bunch of hogwash and misinformation. The pit bull lobby is very well funded and it has spread its deliberate misinformation far and wide. As I mentioned pit bulls were never nanny dogs – that is a recent invention by the pit lobby – even pit advocates have had to admit that. There is absolutely no credible historical evidence of that claim. The National Canine Research Center is owned and part and parcel of the biggest pit bull lobby around, the Animal Farm Foundation. Their bias and agenda is obvious.

    And we don’t need another outdated article that cites ATTS. The ATTS test was devised for Schutzhund enthusiasts and for police work. It has no meaning in determining anything but how bold and aggressive a dog is – obviously good traits for certain types of working line exercises and police work. You mistake the ATTS as something that can help you determine whether a dog should be a pet. It was not designed for that. And now it is just some commercial thing like the useless good canine certificate.

    These are dangerous dogs that were bred for sudden aggression. Their power makes them capable and prone to unprovoked devastating and/or fatal attacks on both humans and other animals. Many lovingly raised and properly trained pits suddenly turn on their owner. Plenty of breeds have sadly been abused and they do not exhibit pit behavior.

    I have no dog in this fight, no pun intended.

  • MyName

    You are wrong. You just like to argue. The facts are what they are and there are pictures proving the history. You choose to believe the haters and jump on the bandwagon. You either like to argue or are gullible or both.

  • MyName

    Now you’re just being silly. Read the facts and stop with your own hate agenda.

  • MyName

    They were nanny dogs and with pictures to prove it. Family dogs of all breeds have been loyal and helped with the children. Even Helen Keller owned a pit bull and we all know the poking and prodding she had to do.

  • GroundControl500

    Pictures to prove it? πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ You mean like the nanny gators? You’re an idiot if you still believe this deliberately created pit myth.

    To explain vintage black and white photographs that depicted children and pit bulls together, a story was created that back in the Victorian age the pit bull was the β€œnanny dog”. These so-called nanny dogs were said to be so good with children parents relied on them to babysit and protect them.

    But the reality is that one fighting breed advocate created this β€œlegend” in 1971 to distance her breed from its fighting origins. This mention was picked up by a newspaper in 1987 and has since been promoted as historical β€œfact.”

    At no point in history were pit bulls ever β€œnanny dogs”. There has not been any proof ever given to make this myth a reality.

    The pit bull advocacy group “BADRAP” admitted in 2013 including a statement on its Facebook page that pit bulls were never nanny dogs and that this myth was dangerous to children. The retraction of the β€œnanny dog myth” has been highly publicized. Despite the retraction, the myth has lived on and pit bull advocates still repeat it regularly.

    http://media.pinterest.com.s3.amazonaws.com/550x/09/b6/be/09b6be3a8163d36dae66420706f61b06.jpg