Top Stories

Gwyneth Paltrow Reveals How Ex-Boyfriend Brad Pitt Confronted Harvey Weinstein for Her

Gwyneth Paltrow Reveals How Ex-Boyfriend Brad Pitt Confronted Harvey Weinstein for Her

Gwyneth Paltrow has given a rare interview in which she opens up about her ex-boyfriend Brad Pitt and how he confronted Harvey Weinstein after he sexually harassed her.

The Oscar-winning actress made an appearance on The Howard Stern Show this week, in which she opened up about what happened.

“We had one incident in a hotel room where he tried to make a pass at me,” Gwyneth said about Harvey. She was alone in the room with him and said the pass was “out of the blue.” She added, “I was blindsided.”

Gwyneth told Brad what happened right away and when they were at the opening night of Hamlet on Broadway, he decided to confront Harvey. (The photo here is of the former couple at that specific event)

“It was the equivalent of throwing him against the wall, energetically,” Gwyneth said. “It was so fantastic because what he did was, he leveraged his fame and power to protect me at a time when I didn’t have fame or power yet… he’s the best.”

”He told me exactly what he said,” she added. “He said, ‘If you ever make her feel uncomfortable again, I’ll kill you.’ It was great.”

See more photos of Gwyneth Paltrow and Brad Pitt in the gallery…

Just Jared on Facebook
gwyneth paltrow brad pitt photos 01
gwyneth paltrow brad pitt photos 02
gwyneth paltrow brad pitt photos 03
gwyneth paltrow brad pitt photos 04
gwyneth paltrow brad pitt photos 05
gwyneth paltrow brad pitt photos 06
gwyneth paltrow brad pitt photos 07
gwyneth paltrow brad pitt photos 08
gwyneth paltrow brad pitt photos 09
gwyneth paltrow brad pitt photos 10

Credit: Jim Smeal, Ron Galella/WireImage; Photos: Getty, WENN
Posted to: Brad Pitt, Gwyneth Paltrow, Harvey Weinstein

JJ Links Around The Web

Getty
  • 2 Chainz & Kesha Ward's wedding in Miami was beyond extravagant - TMZ
  • Jordyn Jones has a new single out! - Just Jared Jr
  • Don Lemon gets emotional during Aretha Franklin tribute on CNN - TooFab
  • Michelle Wolf's Netflix talk show has been canceled - The Hollywood Reporter
  • These two YouTubers are heading to college - Just Jared Jr
  • Dieter from Sprockets

    Gyeneth would be nothing without Wienstien . Her other best friend is accused alleged rapist Batali. Poor choices for her.

  • Dee

    ok harvey…..

  • RachelLJones

    Earn per month up to $9216 by working with Overstock
    online aww.su/6V7Sd

  • GP

    Kudos to Brad

  • Khazija

    Brad should be commended for this, instead certain ignorant people are attacking him. The fact is, is that he only knew about Weinstein making advances towards Paltrow. He didn’t know the full extent of Weinstein’s crimes or alleged rapes or harassment. As her then-boyfriend, he was bold enough to confront Weinstein to make a protective gesture. People mock him for working with him on other projects when the truth is, is that Paltrow, Ashley Judd, Rose McGowan, and the majority of his accusers continued to work with him. Practically every Hollywood heavy weight worked with him at some point. It was not his reponsibility to report Weinstein and people shouldn’t be attacking his victims either. People don’t understand how difficult whistle-blowing or exposing people in Hollywood is. Weinstein was the biggest mogul at the time and the had the power to destroy anybody. It wasn’t until recently that there was a movement against him which would cause people to be brave enough to speak out. He began to lose power after that.

  • neer

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/why-did-brad-pitt-do-two-harvey-weinstein-movies-after-gwyneth-paltrow-and-angelina-jolie-were-attacked

    HOLLYWOOD

    Why Did Brad Pitt Do Two Harvey Weinstein Movies After Gwyneth Paltrow and Angelina Jolie Were Attacked?

    Marlow Stern

    10.12.17

  • jennykomba

    Brad Pitt is Boss

  • Janet Misowa

    Nice one, Brad!

  • rosaryblue

    I don’t believe Gwen – she was wrapped too tightly with Weinstein for DECADES.

  • Demode

    Gwen is full of shit, but I do believe that Brad Pitt did threaten him for trying to make a move on his girl. Brad was working with every major studio at the time. He wasn’t a slave to Weinstein. Also, Weinstein is a guy who wants to fit in with the cool boys, so he would totally cave in to a guy like Brad Pitt.

  • SmartAss

    In the 8 comments having been posted here before mine there are 2 who dont believe Gwyneth Paltrow and find it at least extremely suspicious that she was so closely connected with Harvey Weintstein for so many years.

    I am relieved that im not the only one who sees a discrepancy here. It strongly reminds me of the cases at Fox News with Megyn Kelly and Roger Ailes. She made an amazingly fast career under him but keppt silent for a long time when accusations mounted. And then of course she joined the bandwagon.

    Its totally unbelievable that these woman got heavily promoted in their careers by these men “just” because they were great talents while these same men probably propossed and pressured dozens of others to have sex with them for the same preferentiell treatment.

    The truth very probably is that these woman just accepted the proposition, had sex with them and seeing their very long careers and the massive support probably quite often.

    Gwyneth Paltrow and her PR people are just covering for her. With this story she gets on the metoo bandwagon, pre-emptively counters questions why Harvey Weinstein assisted her career so much and also Brad Pitt joins since he comes off as a big hero while also stopping any questions what he knew and why he didnt do or say something.

    That whole story about him confronting Weinstein hardcore while many others didnt dare or want to stinks. Many even of the women who were the targets of his actions and even of those who themselves where quite high on the star ladder ‘allegedly’ didnt dare to speak out or take action. But ‘superhero’ Brad Pitt confronted the monster head on? And then Weinstein relented, did nothing towards Gwyneth Paltrow anymore and to top it off even massivley assisted her career? Who believes that? Also that Brad Pitt knew ABSOLUTELY nothing about any other women? Are you kidding me? And if he had the power to protect Gwyneth, why didnt he have the power to protect other woman? Demand that Weinstein stops his behaviour? Go into rehab? Maybe not going public i would understand but pressuring him…his brother who also ‘supposedly’ knew nothing…into adressing his actions?

    Whats really worrisome is that these aspects, especially the question what certain women with long and exceptionell careers partnered with Weinstein and also Roger Ailes did or where all the woman are that DID have sex with them suppporting their careers (if that never happened why would any of their promises/offers/threats ever havve been taken seriously?), arent even remotely asked in any media besides some forums or comment sections such as here.

    Are we really to believe that these two for example who are accused of going for many dozens of women NEVER had any success? There were only a very few real forcefull rapes and there were NO women who had sex with them for their careers? Yeah right. And every single one of the thousands of women who are in porn every years is being forced at gunpoint or by threat of horrible torture to participate. Oh and absolutely ALL prostitutes on the whole planet have been sexually abused as children AND are forced on threat of grave violence by the pimps they ALWAYS have to do every single thing they do. We really live in Orwellian times.

  • SmartAss

    Honestly that could be a possibility too. Gwen actually having sex with Weinstein and then somehow something about that getting to Brad or maybe even Gwen fearing it would (maybe someone saw her somewhere or threatened her for some reason to tell Brad) and then she told Brad that Weinstein did something inappropriate.

    And also in her own words in that Howard Stern interview she even said “he came on to her”. Hello? I mean its not classy to hit on a woman who is in a monogamous relationship but not only isnt it a crime its not even that big of a deal morally.

    Then again i have to say i just searched for photos with Brad Pitt and Harvey Weinstein and there seems to be only one or maybe two together with Gwyneth Paltrow the second. And even that one photo doesnt make it look like they were close. And THATS the way i would expect someone to act who was harassed/raped or who knew of such actions by Weinstein. Avoiid being with him, even more avoid being photographed with him and most certainly dont act cozy with him. Like SOOO many of these actresses who now come forward with stories of sexual assault did to the extreme. Huggin him, almost hanging on him in hundreds of photos.

  • Khazija

    A Jolie stan posted a hit piece from The Daily Beast against Pitt on here. Replying to it, just in case they post it again: You have some nerve posting a hit piece against Brad here. I already addressed this point in another post on this page.

    First of all, Paltrow described Weinstein making advances on her. She never said he attacked her and Jolie never described her encounter with Weinstein as an attack. Paltrow made two more movies with Weinstein after that incident. Aniston and Jolie also worked with Weinstein. Jolie never even told Pitt about her experience with him while they were together. Pitt had no knowledge of Weinstein’s track record of physical sexual harassment or allegations of rape. The only thing he knew is that Weinstein had hit on his then-girlfriend Paltrow. It was Paltrow and Jolie’s choice to keep silent back then and not report it. The majority of his accusers continued to work with Weinstein after having negative experiences with him. The fact was is that he was a powerful mogul who had the power to destroy anyone back then. It is not easy to expose people in this industry. When people started coming forward publicly and then a movement began, then he lost that power.

    Weinstein was an executive producer on Inglourious Basterds and was not present on set. He was involved with all of Taratino’s films. He bought the distribution rights to Killing Them Softly via auction so it was not even Pitt’s choice to have Weinstein on board that project. It is hypocritical of the press and his haters to malign Pitt for not exposing Weinstein while not holding anybody else accountable for it. Jolie chose not to report her experience with Weinstein until many years later and there should be no shame in the victims for waiting until they felt they could expose him when it was safe to do so. Just like Pitt, should not be maligned for not reporting Weinstein when the only thing he knew was that Weinstein made advances to his then-girlfriend. He did something about it and warned Weinstein to protect Paltrow. That article is filled with shaming and negative spin while ignoring the ramifications of the circumstances. I know a lot of negative truths about celebrities and etc, but I know what it is like to be in fear of retaliation and destruction from people who are more powerful than you. Proving those claims is also difficult. Any person with any ounce of realism would have empathy about that. Pitt knows a lot of negative stories about a lot of people which includes his exes and he does not air dirty laundry about other people. He did not know the severity of Weinstein’s actions and there was a massive cover-up going on at the time.

  • Khazija

    A Jolie stan posted a hit piece from The Daily Beast against Pitt on here. Replying to it, just in case they post it again: You have some nerve posting a hit piece against Brad here. I already addressed this point in another post on this page.

    First of all, Paltrow described Weinstein making advances on her. She never said he attacked her and Jolie never described her encounter with Weinstein as an attack. Paltrow made two more movies with Weinstein after that incident. Aniston and Jolie also worked with Weinstein. Jolie never even told Pitt about her experience with him while they were together. Pitt had no knowledge of Weinstein’s track record of physical sexual harassment or allegations of rape. The only thing he knew is that Weinstein had hit on his then-girlfriend Paltrow. It was Paltrow and Jolie’s choice to keep silent back then and not report it. The majority of his accusers continued to work with Weinstein after having negative experiences with him. The fact was is that he was a powerful mogul who had the power to destroy anyone back then. It is not easy to expose people in this industry. When people started coming forward publicly and then a movement began, then he lost that power.

    Weinstein was an executive producer on Inglourious Basterds and was not present on set. He was involved with all of Taratino’s films. He bought the distribution rights to Killing Them Softly via auction so it was not even Pitt’s choice to have Weinstein on board that project. It is hypocritical of the press and his haters to malign Pitt for not exposing Weinstein while not holding anybody else accountable for it. Jolie chose not to report her experience with Weinstein until many years later and there should be no shame in the victims for waiting until they felt they could expose him when it was safe to do so. Just like Pitt, should not be maligned for not reporting Weinstein when the only thing he knew was that Weinstein made advances to his then-girlfriend. He did something about it and warned Weinstein to protect Paltrow. That article is filled with shaming and negative spin while ignoring the ramifications of the circumstances. I know a lot of negative truths about celebrities and etc, but I know what it is like to be in fear of retaliation and destruction from people who are more powerful than you. Proving those claims is also difficult. Any person with any ounce of realism would have empathy about that. Pitt knows a lot of negative stories about a lot of people which includes his exes and he does not air dirty laundry about other people. He did not know the severity of Weinstein’s actions and there was a massive cover-up going on at the time.

  • Khazija

    A Jolie stan posted a hit piece from The Daily Beast against Pitt on here. Replying to it, just in case they post it again: You have some nerve posting a hit piece against Brad here. I already addressed this point in another post on this page.

    First of all, Paltrow described Weinstein making advances on her. She never said he attacked her and Jolie never described her encounter with Weinstein as an attack. Paltrow made two more movies with Weinstein after that incident. Aniston and Jolie also worked with Weinstein. Jolie never even told Pitt about her experience with him while they were together. Pitt had no knowledge of Weinstein’s track record of physical sexual harassment or allegations of rape. The only thing he knew is that Weinstein had hit on his then-girlfriend Paltrow. It was Paltrow and Jolie’s choice to keep silent back then and not report it. The majority of his accusers continued to work with Weinstein after having negative experiences with him. The fact was is that he was a powerful mogul who had the power to destroy anyone back then. It is not easy to expose people in this industry. When people started coming forward publicly and then a movement began, then he lost that power.

    Weinstein was an executive producer on Inglourious Basterds and was not present on set. He was involved with all of Taratino’s films. He bought the distribution rights to Killing Them Softly via auction so it was not even Pitt’s choice to have Weinstein on board that project. It is hypocritical of the press and his haters to malign Pitt for not exposing Weinstein while not holding anybody else accountable for it. Jolie chose not to report her experience with Weinstein until many years later and there should be no shame in the victims for waiting until they felt they could expose him when it was safe to do so. Just like Pitt, should not be maligned for not reporting Weinstein when the only thing he knew was that Weinstein made advances to his then-girlfriend. He did something about it and warned Weinstein to protect Paltrow. That article is filled with shaming and negative spin while ignoring the ramifications of the circumstances. I know a lot of negative truths about celebrities and etc, but I know what it is like to be in fear of retaliation and destruction from people who are more powerful than you. Proving those claims is also difficult. Any person with any ounce of realism would have empathy about that. Pitt knows a lot of negative stories about a lot of people which includes his exes and he does not air dirty laundry about other people. He did not know the severity of Weinstein’s actions and there was a massive cover-up going on at the time.

  • Khazija

    Cate Blanchett, Rose McGowan, Ashley Judd, Salma Hayek, and dozens of his accusers continued to work with Weinstein after their negative experiences with him. The fact was that he was a powerful mogul at the time who controlled careers and images. It is understandable that they were scared to speak out against him at the time. That is why it was so important that Ashley Judd and others were brave enough to speak out against Weinstein even if happened years later. He was only exposed and destroyed because a movement was incited recently. The crimes he has been accuse of range from harassment to blackmail to rape and most of this was reported recently. At the time, these actresses probably felt they were the only ones who had these experiences…after it got exposed that he had a track record of this behavior, it was easier for them to come forward especially since Asia Argento filed a lawsuit against him for rape.

  • Khazija

    Cate Blanchett, Rose McGowan, Ashley Judd, Salma Hayek, and dozens of his accusers continued to work with Weinstein after their negative experiences with him. The fact was that he was a powerful mogul at the time who controlled careers and images. It is understandable that they were scared to speak out against him at the time. That is why it was so important that Ashley Judd and others were brave enough to speak out against Weinstein even if happened years later. He was only exposed and destroyed because a movement was incited recently. The crimes he has been accuse of range from harassment to blackmail to rape and most of this was reported recently. At the time, these actresses probably felt they were the only ones who had these experiences…after it got exposed that he had a track record of this behavior, it was easier for them to come forward especially since Asia Argento filed a lawsuit against him for rape.

  • Khazija

    Cate Blanchett, Rose McGowan, Ashley Judd, Salma Hayek, and dozens of his accusers continued to work with Weinstein after their negative experiences with him. The fact was that he was a powerful mogul at the time who controlled careers and images. It is understandable that they were scared to speak out against him at the time. That is why it was so important that Ashley Judd and others were brave enough to speak out against Weinstein even if happened years later. He was only exposed and destroyed because a movement was incited recently. The crimes he has been accuse of range from harassment to blackmail to rape and most of this was reported recently. At the time, these actresses probably felt they were the only ones who had these experiences…after it got exposed that he had a track record of this behavior, it was easier for them to come forward especially since Asia Argento filed a lawsuit against him for rape.

  • Khazija

    I already addressed your points in multiple replies. What you are doing is classic victim-blaming. Weinstein had the power to ruin lives back then because the extent of his actions were not known by everybody. Any person who works in this industry knows how hard it is to expose people.

    You are ignoring that your diatribe applies to all of Weinstein’s victims that chose to speak out many years later and are now holding him accountable. It is easier to speak out when you know multiple people are able to vouch for the same experiences. The fact is, that the majority of his accusers continued to work with him. Pitt only knew about Weinstein hitting on his then-girlfriend and he made a gesture to prevent it from escalating. You have no basis to claim that Pitt knew about Weinstein raping women or etc. It was her choice not to report it as harassment and continue to work with him. It was NOT his place to report other people’s experiences if they did not want to come forward. Why are you holding Pitt accountable for Weinstein’s actions? That makes no sense. No, he did not know about Weinstein raping or threatening other women. Trying to hold Pitt accountable is absurd when most of these women waited years later when they felt they had the proper verification and safe space to come forward.

  • SmartAss

    Im not saying Brad Pitt isnt the dumb boyfriend in this story. It could totally be true that the didnt know much. My main point is that its not believable that Gwyneth Paltrow did not have sex with Harvey Weinstein and got huge support for her career in return.

    And about all those accusers…the other side is that incidents and reports like those also draw a lot of people who for various reasons want to jump on the gravy train. Either for publicity, money from suing or to cover themselfs against criticisim for example.

    That can easily blow up the number of accusers by multiples. 5x, 10x, who knows?

  • Khazija

    Are you going to claim that every one of these accusers who worked with Weinstein had sex with him? The majority of them continued to work with him. I don’t think that is a fair presumption to make. Maybe Weinstein stopped hitting on Paltrow after Pitt confronted him? The fact is that these women were afraid to speak out at the time, because they were afraid he would ruin their careers and lives. It is easier to speak out against him now, because multiple women have already spoken out against him. It is easier to report somebody when other people have already verified that they had similiar experiences that you had. At the time, these women felt they were alone and powerless…that is why there is power in numbers and a level of security when you have those numbers. The flood gates were opened when Ashley Judd reported him publicly and Asia Argento accused him of rape.

  • George

    Brad should have crushed Harvey’s family jewels to shut down any possible future indiscretions.

  • FLASHW7

    I agree with you very much for the most part…one thing i will say, where i disagree a bit though i have always liked Pitt, he did marry Angelina Jolie, who also was in some way assaulted by Weinstein….so Pitt did know of two incidents, not just the Paltrow one. We don’t know how serious the Angelina Jolie incident was, in terms of what Weinstein did to her, since she has not spoken about it publicly.
    Weinstein did have tons of power….but he did not have the power to destroy Brad Pitt and other big names. Don’t forget, Weinstein had many many enemies in Hollywood. People who would have loved to see him fall. He stepped on a lot of toes and enjoyed doing so. But he is not the only ruthless person in Hollywood….and once he left Miramax around 2004/2005, his power was no longer the same….The Weinstein Company was never as powerful as Miramax was when it was owned by Disney during the “glory years” of 1993 – 2004 (and even then, it took until 1998 before it was at “full power” after Good Will Hunting and Shakespeare in Love etc.)
    Pitt seemed to be one of the only people who actually confronted Weinstein, and he clearly got away with it and was not destroyed.
    Tarantino did too, demanding Weinstein apologize to Uma Thurman, which Weinstein did (though in a half-assed way, according to Uma)
    But obviously in Hollywood, sometimes you have to work with some pretty unsavory characters. There were plenty of powerful folks who could have stood up to Weinstein….but not many people had the stomach to go to total war with him.
    There was an interesting article a while back talking about the Oscar battle between Saving Private Ryan and Shakespeare in Love back before the Academy Awards held in spring 1999. SPR was a far superior film, but Weinstein played so dirty in the campaign, to unprecedented levels….Spielberg told his people running the SPR oscar campaign “don’t get down in the mud with Harvey”…..
    So you can imagine, if even Spielberg, who was the king of hollywood at the time, did not want to go to war with Weinstein over something as simple as an oscar statue, nobody would want to go to total war with him over some very serious allegations, that no doubt, Weinstein would go scorched earth/world war 3 to keep the lid on.

  • Khazija

    I hope Just Jared restores my original response here. I posted a reply. I am not going to re-type the entire thing but I will say, that Jolie never told Pitt about her encounter with Weinstein when they were together. Also, she never described it, as an assault.

  • FLASHW7

    Well, unless you know Angelina and Brad personally, I don’ think you can say that with any certainty. Considering Pitt was going to work with Harvey Weinstein on Inglourious Basterds, I think at some point, they may have discussed it.
    As for whether what Weinstein did to Jolie was an “assault” or merely “harassment” we do not know that either, since Angelina has not spoken publicly about what it actually entailed.
    Either way, she chose never to work with Weinstein again, so kudos to her. She had a lot less power in 1998 than Paltrow did, and chose to not have anything further to do with Weinstein.

  • Khazija

    You do not know who I know and I mentioned in my original post, that I do not discuss sources or how I verify info. I am saying that with certainty. If Weinstein had actually crossed a line with Jolie, I doubt that Pitt would have been fine with that. If Weinstein had actually harmed Jolie, then I doubt that Jolie would have have been okay with Pitt working with him especially since she didn’t work with him again after her negative experience. She was at the IB premiere and didn’t appear to disassociate with the project in anyway. Weinstein was the executive producer for practically all of Tarantino’s films as a director, and Pitt wanted to work with Tarantino like a lot of actors. Pitt was already on friendly terms with Tarantino because of True Romance. Weinstein bought the distribution rights to Killing Them Softly via auction so Pitt or Plan B didn’t have much choice there.

    The fact is, that Weinstein simply hitting on Paltrow or Jolie, would not be grounds enough for Pitt to take further action against Weinstein. He did not know how many women Weinstein seriously harassed, threatened, or raped. He did not know the degree of his crimes, and even Paltrow said in the Stern interview, that she did not know the full extent. All he knew at the time, was that he was a producer who loved to make advances towards actresses. If Paltrow or Jolie didn’t want to discuss that at the time openly, he would have to respect their wishes.

  • FLASHW7

    Your post regarding what Angelina Jolie did or did not tell Brad Pitt has no validity without facts, proof and sources.

    Pitt did not have to work with Weinstein, who he knew would be involved with Inglourious Basterds because of his Tarantino association…he chose to.

    I am well aware Tarantino and Pitt knew each other since True Romance since Pitt played Floyd and Tarantino wrote it. Changes nothing. If Pitt had a problem with Weinstein, he should not have worked with him. If he had no problem with Weinstein, then it was fine.

    “She was at the IB premiere and didn’t appear to disassociate with the project in anyway.”

    So? Angelina Jolie appeared at a premier with her husband? For his film? Shocking. She was there to support her husband and get publicity for herself. Being at the same event as Harvey is not going to stop that.
    Uma Thurman is pictured kissing Harvey Weinstein, along with Heidi Klum just a few years ago….they are putting up a front in public. Angelina clearly did not like HArvey at all….neither did Uma, or others….but they took pictures and smiled in public.

    You are right, if Weinstein had only merely hit on Paltrow and Angelina, then that would make it easy for Pitt to work with him. There is nothing wrong with hitting on someone, asking someone out on a date, or telling them you like them/are attracted to them and then backing off if they are not interested. But Weinstein clearly did more than that with Paltrow, (so much so Pitt said he’d “Kill him”)

    and he clearly did *SOMETHING* to Angelina to make her refuse to work with him as she said in her statement “Angelina Jolie told the New York Times that Weinstein made advances on her in a hotel room in the late 1990s that she rejected.

    You said:

    “If Weinstein had actually crossed a line with Jolie, I doubt that Pitt would have been fine with that. If Weinstein had actually harmed Jolie, then I doubt that Jolie would have have been okay with Pitt working with him especially since she didn’t work with him again after her negative experience.”

    Well, she said:

    “I had a bad experience with Harvey Weinstein in my youth, and as a result, chose never to work with him again and warn others when they did,” Ms. Jolie said in an email. “This behavior towards women in any field, any country is unacceptable.”

    You neglected to include the whole “warn others” bit. If nothing bad happened, why would she warn others about him. Sounds like a bit more than just being asked out to dinner.

    If Angelina had such a bad experience with Weinstein (in a hotel room as she said) that it made her never want to work with him again, and it disturbed her so much that she “warned others when they did”, meaning ALL women she knew who would work with him, that is pretty damn serious.

    If he just asked her to date, or for romance politely, why would she warn all women against him? Fact is, you don’t know what he said or did to her. I am guessing it did not get to the physical violence point, because frankly, I think she would have told everyone if he did. But her reticence is strange, regardless of what you think.
    “A bad experience” and never working with him again, and “warning others”….is clearly serious. Uma was almost raped, and she worked with him again. PAltrow was clearly sexually harrassed and she worked with him several times again….so what happened to Jolie that would cause her not to work with him, AND warn many other women when they did.

    As for whether she told Pitt, I think it is hilarious that you think a husband and wife would not discuss Weinstein, if Pitt was about to work with him and Angelina Jolie felt strongly enough about his behavior as to warn women. That is serious.

    And in case you did not know how to read, I already I said I agreed with you for the most part. You just seem to be obsessed with something about Angelina Jolie’s private life and what she did or did not discuss with her husband. You have no knowledge what happened to her with Weinstein and you have no knowledge of the private conversations had between a husband and wife in the Pitt-Jolie home/relationship in 2008 before Inglourious BAsterds.
    No knowledge, unless you are Brad or Angelina.

    I never said Pitt should out Paltrow or Jolie’s stories if they did not want to publicly. I said Pitt could have made the decision not to work on Inglourious BAsterds for his own reasons, knowing that his one time fiance, and his wife had both had very disturbing encounters that went above and beyond mere “hitting on them”.

    And I never said Pitt, or Paltrow or Jolie knew the extent of Weinstein’s crimes. Very few people did, other than Bob Weinstein or Harvey’s lawyers….and i am sure even they did not know the whole vast extent of it when there were not settlements involved. He clearly was a very very very sick person.

  • Khazija

    Excuse me. You are ignoring that I said that I will not expose my sources on this site. I will disclose who I am or who I know or where I heard information. What I said was based on fact and I verify what I claim. No amount of belittling me from you, is going to provoke me from violating the privacy of people and that kind of evidence would not be posted on a site like this anyway. I also know how to read, and your condescending tone against me is rather uncalled for. I am also sure you are a random poster but you are taking a holier than thou attitude as if you know what you are talking about. I do have knowledge and making false declarations about me on behalf of Jolie is not going to change that. There are people that know them. You are calling me ‘obsessed’ for stating the truth that Jolie did not tell Pitt about her negative experience with Weinstein after she boasted about warning people about him, which does not add up.

    You are going around in circles here. The fact is that Paltrow also continued to work with Weinstein on several more films after her experience with him. You are criticizing Pitt for working with him yet are making the false insinuation that Weinstein must have done more than hit on Paltrow for him to confront him. That is a faulty assumption. Did you read Paltrow statement’s about Weinstein or listen to her Stern interview where she describes what happened with Weinstein? She describes Weinstein hitting on her in a hotel room and asking for a massage. She didn’t make any accusations of assault or him physically forcing her or threatening her at the time.

    Pitt acted as a protective boyfriend and confronted Weinstein so he would not make advances towards Paltrow or hit on her again.

    You are also making insinuations about Jolie and declaring something more than him making a pass must have gone on, when there is nothing to support that. Then you admonish Pitt for working with Weinstein again while insinuating that Weinstein must have done more to Jolie or Paltrow. Then you insist that Pitt knew about Jolie’s experience about Weinstein when they were together when you don’t know that either. Yet you are mocking me and claiming that I have no knowledge when I do. Pitt’s camp also issued statements to the media where he backed up Paltrow’s claim about Weinstein making an advance towards her and about him confronting Weinstein about it.

    You are making declarations about Pitt as if they were fact and then admonish me by declaring that nobody knows about private conversations that happened between Pitt or Jolie yet turn around and insist that Pitt knew about Jolie’s experience with Weinstein when they were together. You lecture about proof, facts, and evidence yet there is nothing to back up your declaration that Weinstein had a disturbing encounter with Paltrow or Jolie that went above & beyond mere hitting of them. Neither of them described anything like that. If Jolie had been raped by Weinstein, then it is highly unlikely that Pitt would have worked with him and it is still her prerogative to speak out about that.

    You acknowledge that Pitt, Paltrow, and Jolie did not know the extent of Weinstein’s crimes…yet you criticize Pitt for working with him against and blatantly stating that Paltrow or Jolie had disturbing encounters that went past the point of being merely hit on. Then you state that Pitt knew about Jolie’s encounter with Weinstein ( with no basis) and then criticize me by stating that nobody knows the conversations between husband & wife, yet you insist that Pitt did know. I know for a fact, that he didn’t know that Weinstein had made a pass on Jolie as well while they were together. She contacted him about this story right before she chose to speak out about this to the press. It is not fair for criticize Pitt for working with Weinstein while ignoring the fact that Paltrow and the majority of his accusers continued to work with Weinstein. Jolie claimed she warned others but her then-husband made two films with him. She clearly had no issues with her then-husband working with him and even publicly supported those two projects where Weinstein was at the premiere.

    There is some hypocrisy going on here from you. I will not share who I spoke to or how I know what I know. I will apply discretion on a site like this.

  • Khazija

    I posted a long reply addressing your attack and scornful mocking against me as well as address your faulty points but Just Jared removed it. They do not play fair when it comes to discussion about Jolie. I will try to get that post restored and this is not going to yield a fair back & forth if they are not going to let me post full replies. This is why I rarely comment on Pitt on Just Jared. I am going to see if I can get that restored but I have to say, I do not trust the mods here. It is not fair, that other posters get to post long replies but I can’t say what I have to say in response to people deriding me. I know what was verified to me and there are people who know them that can back it up. Pitt didn’t find out about Jolie’s experience with Weinstein until she contacted him, right before speaking to the press about it.

    I said that I will not reveal sources or who I know or who I spoke to, on this site. You are making false declarations about Jolie and Paltrow being “more than hit on” by Weinstein that have no backing while criticizing Pitt for it. Paltrow said that Weinstein did not hit on her again, after Pitt confronted him. Then she went on, to make several more films with him. Pitt’s team also backed up Paltrow’s account to the press.

    Pretty sure, that you are just a Jolie fan who has no idea what Jolie told Pitt or not yet , you act like she did. She boasted about warning others not to work with Weinstein yet Pitt did. She was out there supporting Pitt publicly at premieres where Weinstein was there. This does not add up. You have no legit basis for claiming that Weinstein must have had disturbing encounters with Jolie and Paltrow that went above and beyond, merely hitting on them while insinuating that Pitt knew about it. Not to mention, if any crimes were committed against Paltrow or Jolie, it would be up to them to report it. You acknowledge that none of them knew the full extent yet criticize Pitt for working with him, when he didn’t know the severity of his crimes.

  • FLASHW7

    Your last post is inactive, so here is my reply to it
    1. “Excuse me. You are ignoring that I said that I will not expose my sources on this site. I will disclose who I am or who I know or where I heard information. ”

    I am not ignoring it….I am disputing it. I don’t believe you at all. Offer facts and proof or your claims regarding it are invalid. Show the facts and proof I wont ignore it. Refuse to show facts and proof, and I will dispute it, not ignore it.

    Your claims are baseless hearsay, without proof.

    2. “What I said was based on fact and I verify what I claim. ”

    You have not verified it to me or provided facts or proof. WHat you have posted thus far is hearsay, no matter what you claim, until you post facts and proof.

    3. “No amount of belittling me from you, is going to provoke me from violating the privacy of people and that kind of evidence would not be posted on a site like this anyway. ”

    I am not belittling you. There are no insults or belittling at all.
    I am contesting your claims, because you have provided no fact or proof and I do not believe you have direct access to the conversations of a husband and wife, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, in 2008. Not at all. You have no access to their private conversations or innermost thoughts. Zero. no matter what site we are on. Your claims are nothing but hearsay, whether we are on JustJared, or Time MAgazaine.

    4. “I also know how to read, and your condescending tone against me is rather uncalled for.”

    If you know how to read, I’d suggest you do it, instead of mixing hp concoctions of hearsay and claims to the private conversations of a famous husband and wife you don’t have access to. If I am condescending towards you, that it is because I do not believe you have any access to what a famous husband and wife have said to each other in the privacy of the confines of their own marriage.

    5. “I am also sure you are a random poster but you are taking a holier than thou attitude as if you know what you are talking about.”

    I am a random poster. So are you. My attitude is not holier than thou. Unlike you, I do not claim to have some holy access to the conversations of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, in their private lives.

    6.” I do have knowledge and making false declarations about me on behalf of Jolie is not going to change that. ”

    Hilarious, I am not making anything on the “behalf of Jolie”. I think she is a manipulative phony. I am contesting your ridiculous assertions, not holding Angelina Jolie up as a saint in order to “get” Brad Pitt.
    I like him a lot more than I like her.

    You have no direct knowledge of the private conversations held between two very famous people, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie. If you were that close to these two people, that they would trust you in the midst of their closes marital thoughts, you have already betrayed them by being here on this site, engaging in nonsense. At best, you work for a PR firm where one of them is a client, likely Pitt….or maybe not even that. Either way, You don’t have the direct knowledge you claim of private conversations between two people. You have only hearsay.

    7. “There are people that know them. ”

    Not you though….and you don’t know them enough to be privy to their marital secrets and conversations. Again , your claims are hearsay, nothing more.

    8. “You are calling me ‘obsessed’ for stating the truth that Jolie did not tell Pitt about her negative experience with Weinstein after she boasted about warning people about him, which does not add up.”

    You are obsessed, if you think you have access to Pitt and Jolie’s private marital conversations from 10 years ago…. you may also be insane.

    9. “You are going around in circles here. ”

    You are the one claiming direct knowledge of what one of the most famous couples in the history of Hollywood were exactly talking about in their private marital discussions. Sorry friend, you are in your own circle of hearsay.

    10. “The fact is that Paltrow also continued to work with Weinstein on several more films after her experience with him. ”

    I already said that i my first post, genius. That is not news. I think she is a terrible person who sold her soul for fame, and used Brad Pitt to get famous, then dumped him and then didn’t have the guts to stop working with Weinstein, who had treated her terribly.

    11. “You are criticizing Pitt for working with him yet are making the false insinuation that Weinstein must have done more than hit on Paltrow for him to confront him. ”

    I did no such thing. Pitt made his choice to work with Weinstein. I said he could have avoided it. I said in my very first post I have always liked Pitt and he was one of the only ones to confront Weinstein, so good for him . I insinuated nothing. It is a fact that Weinstein did more than just “hit on her” (Paltrow). He put his hands on her shoulders, and suggested they engage in massages….and he did so while she was in his employ with regards to “Emma”. That is clear sexual harrassment, not “hitting on Paltrow”.
    Maybe you should go look up “sexual harassment”, the legal terms.

    12. “That is a faulty assumption. Did you read Paltrow statement’s about Weinstein or listen to her Stern interview where she describes what happened with Weinstein? She describes Weinstein hitting on her in a hotel room and asking for a massage. She didn’t make any accusations of assault or him physically forcing her or threatening her at the time.”

    It is not a faulty assumption at all. What he did was not “hitting on her” at all. What he did was called Sexual Harrassment. Not hitting on. She already had the role in “Emma”. He clearly wanted sex from her, thus asking for the massage. He was her employer. Sexual harassment, plain as day. That is not the same as hitting on her.

    13. “Pitt acted as a protective boyfriend and confronted Weinstein so he would not make advances towards Paltrow or hit on her again.”

    And I commend him on that. Good for him. He did a very brave thing and he suffered no consequences for it, because he was famous and becoming very powerful.

    14. “You are also making insinuations about Jolie and declaring something more than him making a pass must have gone on, when there is nothing to support that.”

    I am not insinuating at all. To insinuate is to “suggest or hint (something bad or reprehensible) in an indirect and unpleasant way”.
    I am doing no such thing. I am declaring my belief openly that Weinstein did something more to Jolie then merely hit on her. Her response to him to never work with him again and to “warn others” is indicative of her suffering something more than merely being “hit on”.
    Whether she was sexually harrassed, or groped, or threatened, we will never know probably, but my guess is, a beautiful woman like Angelina Jolie had been hit on many times when she was young. Why would she feel the need to “warn” people unless she felt he was dangerous in a way that was more than just flirtation, propositions and “hitting on”? Nobody “warns others when they work with him” or will never work with someone again for something as simple as making a pass at them, or telling them they find them attractive.

    15. “Then you admonish Pitt for working with Weinstein again while insinuating that Weinstein must have done more to Jolie or Paltrow.”

    Nope, never admonished Pitt, I like Pitt. To admonish is to warn or reprimand someone firmly. I merely questioned his decision to work with someone who he knew behaved very inappropriately towards his former fiance (sexually harassing her) and his wife (we do not know how serious Weinstein’s actions were towards her.
    Nowhere did I say Weinstein must have done more to Paltrow. Again, learn how to read.
    Jolie, yes, I believe he did something more than “hit on her”.

    16. “Then you insist that Pitt knew about Jolie’s experience about Weinstein when they were together when you don’t know that either.”
    Yes, I absolutely insist that. Because that is my belief about what two loving people would share if they were concerned about each other and working with someone with a questionable reputation. There is no way Jolie would hide that from him if he was going to work with Weinstein.

    17. “Yet you are mocking me and claiming that I have no knowledge when I do.”

    That’s right…because I don’t claim to have information regarding their private conversations, you do. It is my belief that a husband and wife would discuss such an important thing. I have no access to their bedroom or discussions, you claim to have proof.

    18. “Pitt’s camp also issued statements to the media where he backed up Paltrow’s claim about Weinstein making an advance towards her and about him confronting Weinstein about it.”

    Duh. Everyone knows that. Nobody is questioning that. Paltrow spoke of it last October.

    19. “You are making declarations about Pitt as if they were fact”

    I am not making any declaration about Pitt. But there are facts, that are facts.
    A. Paltrow was his fiance, she was sexually harrassed by Weinstein, Paltrow told pitt, who confronted and threatened Weinstein to leave her alone. Good for him. Fact.
    B. Jolie was his wife and in a relationship with him for over a decade. Jolie had what was clearly a very traumatic incident with Weinstein, that caused her to never work with him again, and to warn others about him when they worked with him. Clearly that event was troubling enough to warn women she may have barely known….FACT.
    C. so, tell me, if she would warn multiple random actresses/women about Harvey, why would she not tell her partner, her lover, her husband, the father of her children about it?

    Try telling me another one if you think she would tell dozens of women to be careful about Weinstein’s sexual advances or actions, and not tell her husband.

    D. Pitt chose to work with Weinstein, because Pitt wanted to work with Tarantino. Fact.

    20. “and then admonish me by declaring that nobody knows about private conversations that happened between Pitt or Jolie yet turn around and insist that Pitt knew about Jolie’s experience with Weinstein when they were together. ”

    I didn’t merely admonish you, I criticized you quite clearly and questioned your truthfulness, flat out, since I believe you are lying and have absolutely zero access to Pitt and Jolie’s private conversations.
    I didn’t insist that Pitt knew. I believe he knew. I have no access to him, unlike you who claim to. Again, you do not read very well.

    21. You lecture about proof, facts, and evidence yet there is nothing to back up your declaration that Weinstein had a disturbing encounter with Paltrow or Jolie that went above & beyond mere hitting of them.

    No lecture is necessary. It is a FACT and there is EVIDENCE as to Paltrow being Sexually harrassed by Weinstein. You said it yourself. Listen to her interviews. You were just blabbing about what she said earlier. What she said, points to clear sexual harassment. That is a far more disturbing encounter than just “hitting on her”. Asking someone working for you in a massage in a hotel room, is just a bit more disturbing than asking someone out to a romantic dinner, wouldn’t you say?
    If Jolie was so disturbed by Weinstein that she vowed to never work with him again, and warn others, I am offering my belief that it was something more disturbing than merely “hitting on her”.
    If he had just hit on her and said
    “you are really beautiful, maybe we could get some dinner”
    and she said
    “oh sorry, let’s keep it professional if you don’t mind.”
    and he said
    “i’m sorry i did not mean to overstep, I hope you can forgive me”…
    Do you think she would have been that disturbed so as to never work with him again and to warn others about him? It is clear that something more disturbing went on…again, likely sexual harassment….just like in the case of Paltrow.

    22. “Neither of them described anything like that. If Jolie had been raped by Weinstein, then it is highly unlikely that Pitt would have worked with him and it is still her prerogative to speak out about that.”

    I never said she was raped by him. Again, learn to read and stop making up things. I said I believed it was something more than mere “hitting on”. Most likely sexual harassment.

    23. “You acknowledge that Pitt, Paltrow, and Jolie did not know the extent of Weinstein’s crimes…”

    You don’t say? That is not hard to figure out, smartypants. I have been quite clear about it, as I have been about many other things, you just don’t seem to like reading comprehension too much. In my very first posts I stated that I agreed with you for the most part.

    24. “yet you criticize Pitt for working with him against”

    You might want to work on your writing, as well as your reading. I questioned his decision, and the rest of this phrase makes no sense.

    25. “and blatantly stating that Paltrow or Jolie had disturbing encounters that went past the point of being merely hit on. ”

    It is absolute fact that Paltrow had a more disturbing encounter than merely being hit on. Did you actually listen to the Stern interview that you keep whining about? That was sexual harassment, not merely hitting on her. Listen to what she said, since you were yammering about it earlier.
    She had gotten the role of “Emma”, she would be working for Miramax in that capacity in the film….Weinstein was paying her salary, her effective boss….he placed his hands on her shoulders, in a private hotel room, and asked her to massage him.
    That is not merely being hit on, that is sexual harassment, which is against the law, pal. That is pretty disturbing.
    And yes, I will “blatantly” state that it is a fact, that if Paltrow’s story is true, which I believe it is, it is clearly Sexual harassment, which is illegal and disturbing….hitting one someone is not illegal and not disturbing.
    I believe something more disturbing happened to Jolie too, than merely being hit on. Likely sexual harassment similar to Paltrow’s situation.

    26. “Then you state that Pitt knew about Jolie’s encounter with Weinstein ( with no basis)”

    Nope. I said I believe it to be true, based on my opinion of them being close partners, parents and husband and wife, and it being a serious issue that normal husbands and wives discuss, especially when safety or personal opinions of someone’s behavior might be in question, like Harvey Weinstein. If you think Pitt and Jolie were together for 12 years and they never discussed any type of feeling towards Harvey Weinstein, considering Pitt was going to work with him and Jolie had worked with him.
    That is my basis. My strong belief that a loving husband and wife might discuss the behavior of a very despicable man that one was going to work with (Pitt) and one had worked with and had a very disturbing experience with (Jolie.)

    27. “and then criticize me by stating that nobody knows the conversations between husband & wife, yet you insist that Pitt did know. ”

    I criticized you for you claiming you had proof of their private conversations. I never said I have proof. I stated my belief. Learn the difference. You stated you had facts about their conversations.
    I call you a liar.

    28. “I know for a fact, that he didn’t know that Weinstein had made a pass on Jolie as well while they were together.”

    Lol…and there is your problem. Unlike you, I have never claimed as fact my belief. You clearly are claiming it despite refusing to provide proof or facts. I have stated opinion, you have stated hearsay, claiming it as verifiable fact. Well, if you cant offer verification, it’s not fact, pal.

    29. “She contacted him about this story right before she chose to speak out about this to the press.”

    Sorry, don’t believe you. Maybe she did contact him and tell him she would speak out. That makes sense. They were close and they likely discuss how things will affect them and their children.
    Frankly, I don’t that she’d tell the press about this, but would not tell him in 10 + years of a relationship, including especially when Pitt was to work with that monster.

    30. “It is not fair for criticize Pitt for working with Weinstein ”

    Lol, I questioned it. Same as I question everyone else who knew about elements of Weinsteins behavior and kept working with him. Those that knew about things that were more disturbing than merely hitting on women, deserve to be questioned.

    31. “while ignoring the fact that Paltrow and the majority of his accusers continued to work with Weinstein. ”

    Hilarious….I loathe Paltrow….did you even READ? God, did you make it out of grade school? My second post, last paragraph focused on what a pathetic hypocrite Paltrow was/is, compared to Jolie. Pitt DEFENDED Paltrow…yet she wound up dumping a guy like him who was honest and loyal to her and defended her against a monster. Getting a career and Oscar from Weinstein was more important to her than her boyfriend, her pride and her integrity.

    She is the worst….
    She was a silly unknown ingenue at the time in 1995, she dates Brad Pitt, she gets famous because of him, she spends all her time from 1995-1997 blabbing endlessly to every magazine and tv show about the relationship, milking it for all it was worth for publicity….

    he is totally devoted to her, he stands up for her against Harvey Weinstein a notorious creep and bully, putting himself at great risk to do so, when PAltrow had already been in two Miramax movies….

    she then dumps Pitt two years later, and, instead goes on to make 5 more movies with Weinstein, who buys her the oscar for Shakespeare in Love, she revels in being the “First Lady of Miramax”, And makes tens of millions from Weinstein….the same man who was so vile to her and so many other women.

    Meanwhile, Steven Spielberg is her godfather and her father was a well known and very respected TV producer, Bruce Paltrow. She was one of the most well connected people in Hollywood.

    So she had Steven Spielberg, Brad Pitt, Her father, and mother, and all their connections, all on her side….Paltrow just shut up and took whatever Weinstein offered in return for not saying anyhting and he made her a star. My guess is, he “paid her back” for keeping silent, by making her the “First Lady” of Miramax.

    Harvey bought Paltrow’s silence by giving her a career and buying her an oscar.

    I ignored nothing you silly person, especially about Paltrow. I loathe Paltrow, and unlike you, I know all about her, through me and members of my immediate family who knew her, her father(when he was alive,) and brother (but not her mother) personally.
    I also know the boyfriend here in New York she was dating when she dumped him to go date Pitt in 1995….and he is the same one she went back to humping all summer after she dumped Pitt in spring 1997. She dumped Pitt because she is a snotty, spoiled UES NYC brat, who thinks she is better than everyone and he was just a redneck, not nearly good enough for her and her faux-sophistication.

    She is a complete phony, and I ignored nothing about her. She is the biggest embarrassment in the whole Weinstein situation….while other poor, broke powerless actresses were getting raped and broken by him, she was getting a gilded career in return for her “suffering”.

    32. “Jolie claimed she warned others but her then-husband made two films with him.”

    Yes, he did.

    33. “She clearly had no issues with her then-husband working with him and even publicly supported those two projects where Weinstein was at the premiere.”

    Lol, Jolie did not support those projects or Weinstein….she supported her husband by going to the premier parties. Like anyone else would do for their spouse…support them.
    And do you think a PR – wanting vamp like Angelina would miss a chance for publicity at Cannes and LA?
    She is the queen of getting herself out there in the limelight. She knew Weinstein would be at the premier and nobody would be looking at him….they’d be looking at her on the steps at Cannes in April 2009 and later at all the premieres. Just what she wanted.

    34. “There is some hypocrisy going on here from you. I will not share who I spoke to or how I know what I know. I will apply discretion on a site like this.”

    Hilarious….you have no facts, but you clearly are in some way connected to Pitt’s PR Firm…is he still represented by Cindy Guagenti? I can’t even remember who reps him now. And who cares?
    There is no hypocrisy here, you just can’t read and are hysterical.
    Off you go, flack.
    Save your time, I won’t be reading anymore of your nonsense. You have no clue what happened in the private conversations behind closed doors behind a famous husband and wife.
    You will apply discretion? Hilarious….try applying your brain first to actual reading instead of going in to hysterics.

  • FLASHW7

    Quit whining….I copied your “long post” in full, and my post addressed to you, is posted above in reply to your previous post, separated and addressed point by point.
    Go look it up, cupcake. JJ said it was “inactive”, fortunately I copied it, word for word. It is just as nonsensical as everything else you have posted, but I felt it deserved a reply.

    There are no false declarations about Paltrow. What she described on Howard Stern was clear Sexual Harrassment, *NOT* being hit on as you have so cutely called it.
    Sexual Harassment, is illegal, a crime and far worse than your dismissing it as merely being “hit on”.

    And Jolie likely encountered the very same thing Paltrow did.

    Now I am a Jolie fan? Lol. She is a phony, and a liar and most of her movies are utterly terrible and she’ll do anything for good publicity.
    I can’t stand Paltrow either, she is far worse….so stop being a baby, read my big response to your silly screed and stop whining.
    I like Pitt far more than I like either of those phonies. Doesn’t change the truth though.
    Go read the laws about sexual harassment first before you go around whining that they were just being “hit on”. Maybe you have never had a female friend who was sexually harassed but I have….and it most certainly is a CRIME….it is not being hit on *AT ALL*, when you are in someone’s employ and they have power over you and make sexual advances and use your career as leverage.

  • Khazija

    You are harassing me at this point and are resorting to insults/mocking.

    Everything I said was valid and legitimate. You refusing to believe it, is your prerogative but I will stand by the truth. I can read properly and I have not been hysterical. I am replying to your attacks and hypocritical insistence of actions. The fact is that you have no basis to discredit what I said and you have no idea who I know or not. You are mocking me for respecting the privacy of people who verified things to me. Then you are making a bunch of statements and declarations by acting like it is fact when it is based on conjecture and speculation on your part.

    Why aren’t you applying this logic to yourself? You do NOT know what Jolie or Pitt privately discussed or not. I know you are just a random poster getting belligerent on behalf of Jolie, otherwise you would not be deriding me or ranting with long replies based on spin, against what I said. Their public statements do not indicate anything more him making advances to them. There is far more that indicates backup to what I said. You can belittle me all you want but the people close to the situation know what I am saying is accurate.

  • Khazija

    I am not whining and you are attacking me at this point over making legitimate points and over a true statement that I made that you are desperately trying to debunk even though you have no basis to. Stop being sexist and calling me cupcake or other names. Stop attacking my intelligence. You are the one getting bent out of shape over me disagreeing with you while addressing your spin.

    There is nothing nonsensical about what I said. Paltrow didn’t file any lawsuits against Weinstein and neither did Jolie. I described what she said in my other posts. He made advances to her in a hotel room and asked for a massage. I know that it is inappropriate but you are the one who is describing that going above and beyond hitting on them. You also have no clue what transpired between him and Jolie, but are making false attributions about it while implying that Pitt knew about it.

    If they were assaulted, that is their aim to speak out about it or take any action about it. I haven’t changed the truth at all. You did make one false declaration after another and acting like your spin proves that fact. I am a woman in this industry. I have certainly dealt with sexual harassment and abuse of power.
    You know nothing about me yet are going on attack dog mode because I said that Pitt didn’t know about Jolie’s encounter with Weinstein while they were together. You are being rabid on going on the defensive for Jolie.

    I care about the victims and spoke out to defend them on this page in other replies.

  • Khazija

    Everything I said was credible and makes sense. You are the contradicting yourself and going around in circles while being determined to undermine as well as degrade me over replying to you. Then you are lecturing me about hearsay and proof when everything you have said is hearsay and has zero backing to it. I know what was verified to me and that is why I am holding my stance. Harass me all you want, but I will apply discretion and not expose sources or conversations I had.

    In another post, you ridicule me and then turn around and acknowledge that Weinstein had the power to ruin careers but then in this post, you rant on & on by complaining that Paltrow didn’t report Weinstein either. Your entire perspective and ranting is contradictory. Then you keep insisting that Weinstein did more than make advances to Paltrow or Jolie and engaged in disturbing acts by acting like Pitt covered for him when he did not. Pitt only knew about Paltrow having to deal with advances at that time and he didn’t know about Jolie’s situation with him while they were together.

    You insist that Jolie must have been terribly victimized by Weinstein and bring up the fact that she said that she warned Pitt. You defend her by saying she was just supporting her husband and then mock her in another sentence for wanting attention. Yet you got so angry at me for stating the truth that Pitt did not know about Jolie’s negative experience with Weinstein together. Your attitude and mind-set is all over the place. The fact is, is if Weinstein harmed her seriously, I doubt she would be fine with Pitt working him again. Going to premieres for Pitt’s projects with Weinstein is supporting his projects with him. If Weinstein raped or actually assaulted Paltrow or Jolie, a different sort of action would have taken place. Either way, it was up to them, to report the situation.

    Again, your spin and rabid insistence that a couple must have discussed their experiences with Weinstein is made on pure speculation and has no bearing in reality. Why on earth are you being so adamant about this? Then you keep saying Weinstein did something disturbing to Jolie without knowing what he did and acting like Pitt was so wrong to work with Weinstein again while making repeated false implications as to what his knowledge was. All you have in your arsenal to attack me is spin and faulty reasoning.

    Even somebody close to Jolie told the press, that she contacted Pitt before she told her Weinstein story to the press.

    You blather on about Paltrow and Spielbeg….the fact is that the majority of Weinstein accusers worked with him on multiple projects. Weinstein did not rape her or do anything extreme when compared to the other accounts of actresses. She also described that Weinstein warned her not to discuss her encounter with him privately. Your criticism of her not speaking out against Weinstein earlier could easily apply to a number of his other victims who waited until they had safe space to speak out against him, after a movement was incited and lawsuits were filed.

    I am not a liar. God, knows I am telling the truth and there are people who know them will know that I am telling the truth when they read this. No amount of disparaging from you is going to shame me.

    I am not paid by Pitt’s firm and Cindy Guagenti does not work for him anymore. The fact that you resorted to making that accusation is beyond lame and that is what his haters do, after people adequately defend him. Nothing I posted was nonsense.

  • Khazija

    I hope Just Jared restores three of my posts. I respect guidelines and none of my posts are spam. Please resolve this issue. There is an imbalanced discussion going on where somebody is attacking me while not all of my replies to them are being displayed. I address their points.

  • Mona Kabel

    You are right. Jolie told it in an interview or in the telefon call to NYP. She never told Pitt and why not? He was with her for 12 years. I think, Jolie jumps on the train only for attention and there was no encounter with Weinstein. She is such a attention wh…

  • MyName

    Yes, at that the extent of it all wasn’t known. People are sometimes ‘hit on’ others and are told to back off by a significant other. It happens by friends, coworkers, etc. in all fields. People have no reason to think there’s anything more after the ‘shut down’ unless/until it’s exposed.
    BP did what was expected with the knowledge he then had.