JustJared
Just Jared
keira-knightley-vogue.jpg

Keira Knightley Vogues Again

Santa Monica, California :: Looks like actress Keira Knightley, 20, has snagged herself another cover with Vogue after gracing the cover not too long ago.  The British bombshell was featured in a 20-page "Wizard of Oz" photo spread back in December 2005.  Here Keira is in two different outfits (with a four-legged friend) on the set of her new Vogue photo shoot at the Shangri-La Hotel this past Wednesday. More pictures in the gallery!
keira knightley vogue keira-knightley-vogue01
keira knightley vogue keira-knightley-vogue02
keira knightley vogue keira-knightley-vogue03
keira knightley vogue keira-knightley-vogue04
keira knightley vogue keira-knightley-vogue05
keira knightley vogue keira-knightley-vogue06
keira knightley vogue keira-knightley-vogue07
keira knightley vogue keira-knightley-vogue08
keira knightley vogue keira-knightley-vogue09
keira knightley vogue keira-knightley-vogue10
keira knightley vogue keira-knightley-vogue11

Categories: Keira Knightley
 

21 Comments Have Already Been Posted

why does she need to be on Vogue? What is she promoting...?

Q: "What is she promoting...?"
A: herself.

Not to be catty but - I've seen her in a swim suit and she is much larger in the upper thighs than you would think. She is very tiny in the top but her legs aren't nice and she always hides them under dresses.

So that makes her what, human? I like that she's "real". No fake tits, normal legs and yet she's beautiful. More power to her.

oh yeah, she looked enormous on the cover of Vanity Fair - heavy sarcasm

HAVE A LOOK AT THE BEACH SHOT WITH HER BOYFRIEND IN - NOT SURE WHAT ISLAND - I HAVE TO SAY THAT, JUST THE TRUTH, IS RIGHT, SHE ACTUALLY WAS WEARING SHORTS TO HIDE HER UPPER LEGS. YES SHE HAS A BEAUTIFUL FACE AND UPPER TORSO BUT SHE IS NO BEACH BABE - BUT HUMAN AND HAS FLAWS THAT HER PUBLICIST HIDES WELL. IF YOU LOOK CLOSELY IN HER WHITE PANTS IT SHOWS. SORRY BUT A BIG SWEATER CAN'T HIDE A BIG BUM. - SO-TO-SPEAK.

yes, i see the saddle bags - tight white pants are a killer for showing this off. She should stick to the long dresses.

Why is she always so hunched? Her small breasts look even smaller.

Um helllllllloooooo but the covers of mags are all re-touched - the beach walk was not - she has a beautiful face and a big butt.

Look, I'd hit that in a second, and so would you.

she wore tiny shorts in bend it like beckham and looked hot.

i wish i had fat thighs like her.

#11 - you probably do.

Too freakin funny, Hippo.

No - #10 - I wouldn't. I'm not into lady butts - I like a nice taut manly one.

And what? You guys want her to get herself 'done' the way every other actress is doing? Maybe a botched lipo job a la Tara? Or maybe she could just starve herself and join the ranks of Nicole and Lindsay? Then everyone here could start accusing her of getting too thin.

DACHSHUND! YAY! ;)

I'm so tired of her.

Wow you are all so dumb. Keira knightley is so gorgeous you are all jealous you need to stop ripping her apart and look in the mirror! When did a nice plump bum become a bad thing? She has nice abs, fine boobs, and a very nice ass! She is so beautiful and just because you disagree with her healthy body image doesn't mean you should rub your negativity on everyone else! She is a healthy glowing beautiful girl and you all need to back up, I bet if you posted pictures of yourself we could all rip you apart and your imperfections but some of us have more dignity!

Someone needs to hem her white pants - so tacky.

She looks as though she's scowling at the camera - and yes, she has a wide arse.

THOSE SANDALS SHE'S WEARING WITH THE WHITE PANTS - SUCK. THE WHOLE PIC IS JUST PLAIN BUTT UGLY - THE HAIR - THE PANTS - AND YES I THINK SHE'S BEAUTIFUL BUT THESE PICS ARE REALLY BAD FOR HER.

 

Just Post Your Own Comment






characters left

 

Mail Keira Knightley Vogue to a friend:

Your E-mail Address:

Friend's E-mail Address:

Message (optional):

Previous Pause Next