Top Stories

Angelina Jolie's 'Economist' Article

Angelina Jolie's 'Economist' Article

The Economist has published Angelina Jolie‘s article for their annual spin-off issue, The World in 2008. CLICK HERE to read the full article.

In other news, Angelina Jolie‘s adoption of daughter Zahara in July 2005 was completely legal, the agency involved said on Thursday.

Tabloids reported earlier this week that relatives of two-year-old Zahara, including a woman who says she is her birth mother, want the child returned to Ethiopia.

“The court in Addis Ababa approved the adoption after studying the document her grandmother wrote … saying her daughter, the mother of Zahara, had died and she was too poor to bring her up,” Tsegaye Berhe, the head of Wide Horizons for Children adoption agency told Reuters.

“The grandmother brought three witnesses to court who testified that Zahara‘s mother had died and that her father was unknown … The court also investigated the social status of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt before approving the adoption. [The adoption was] legal and irrevocable. The controversy is media hype by unethical journalists exploiting the poverty of the grandmother.”

In other words, reporters paid the relatives to raise the dispute.


——————————————-

A year for accountability

Angelina Jolie, goodwill ambassador to the UNHCR, hopes for progress in bringing war criminals to justice

On a recent mission for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, I had the opportunity to visit a refugee camp in Chad just across the border with Sudan. Sitting with a group of refugees, I asked them what they needed. These were people who had seen family members killed, neighbours raped, their villages burned and looted, their entire communities driven from their land. So it was no surprise when people began listing the things that could improve their lives just a little bit. Better tents, said one; better access to medical facilities, said another. But then a teenage boy raised his hand and said, with powerful simplicity, “Nous voulons un procès.” We want a trial.

A trial might seem a distant and abstract notion to a young man for whom the inside of a courtroom is worlds away from the inside of a refugee camp. But his statement showed a recognition of something elemental: that accountability is perhaps the only force powerful enough to break the cycle of violence and retribution that marks so many conflicts.

I believe 2008 can be the year in which we begin seeking true accountability and demanding justice for the victims in Darfur and elsewhere. Through accountability we can begin the process of righting past wrongs, and even change the behaviour of some of the world’s worst criminals.

The international tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and for Rwanda have shown the way in convicting heads of state and generals for genocide and crimes against humanity. The UN-backed special court for Sierra Leone has already sentenced three former leaders of a pro-government militia to jail for war crimes committed during the country’s civil war in the 1990s.

In Cambodia, the joint UN-Cambodian court to try top former Khmer Rouge leaders with war crimes and crimes against humanity has begun calling witnesses. It has taken a long time to get even this far, but a trial is likely in 2008. In The Hague, the International Criminal Court (ICC) has begun trials of two of the Congolese leaders charged with fomenting killings and rapes amid the violence that has raged there for over a decade.

Make no mistake, the existence of these trials alone changes behaviour. Seeing the indictment of Thomas Lubanga and the detention of Germain Katanga by the ICC brought to mind a trip I had taken to Congo five years ago. In the Ituri region, where Mr Katanga’s reign of terror had been most intense, our group attended a meeting of rebel leaders. They had gathered in a field to discuss the prospects for a peace agreement—which were not looking very good. The conversation turned hostile and the situation grew extremely tense. At that point, one of my colleagues asked for the name of one of the rebels, announcing, perhaps a bit recklessly, that he was going to pass it along to the ICC.

It was remarkable: this rebel leader’s whole posture changed from aggression to conciliation. The ICC had been around for only five months. It had tried no one. Yet its very existence was enough to intimidate a man who had been terrorising the population for years.

Ending the cycle of violence

This is not an isolated example. Accountability has the potential to change behaviour, to check aggression by those who are used to acting with impunity. Luis Moreno-Ocampo, the prosecutor of the ICC, has said that even genocide is not a crime of passion; it is a calculated decision. He is right. Common sense tells us that when risks are weighed, decisions are made differently. When crimes against humanity are punished consistently and severely, the killers’ calculus will change.

My hope is that these examples of justice in the name of accountability will be just a few of the many to come. I hope that the Sudanese government will hand over the government minister and the janjaweed militia leader who have been indicted for war crimes by the ICC, and that the teenager I met in Chad will get to see the trial he seeks. I hope that those responsible for the atrocities in Darfur will be held to account, not only for that young man’s sake, but for the world’s.

Only through justice will we achieve peace. And only when there is peace will the world’s nearly 39m displaced persons and refugees be able to return home.

The strong preying upon the weak and the weak, upon achieving strength, extracting retribution: this is the nature of so many of the world’s conflicts. The role of aggressor and victim may alternate over time, the tools of destruction may become more sophisticated, but little else changes.

Despite the horror I have seen in my travels, the hopeful lesson I take is that we can begin to put an end to the cycle of violence and retribution that gives rise to war criminals and sets forth floods of refugees. Let 2008 be the year in which we see the principle of accountability put into action.

Angelina Jolie: The World in 2008 [The Economist]

Like Just Jared on Facebook

JJ Links Around The Web

Getty

2,217 Responses to “Angelina Jolie's 'Economist' Article”

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 789 » Show All

  1. 26
    Okay Says:

    A GOOD AND HOPEFUL ARTICLE

  2. 27
    something Says:

    don’t really care for aj and brad too much…. BUT that said.. in no way should that child be removed from them. they seem to be good parents and that is what matters most.
    that is their child and to have even the thought out there that its not is just wrong. money hungry people will always try to bring drama into rich peoples lives/

  3. 28
    worth repeating Says:

    7 Besane : 11/15/2007 at 1:45 pm

    Tabloid writers make their living out of catering to Jolie-Pitt haters (”MiniVan majority”) who are so desperate for any bad news for Angie. There are no shortage of resentful and insecure women who take their own misery out on successful, beautiful and talented Angelina. HATERS are the ones who are exploiting the poor grandmother in Africa. Shame on you.
    =============================================

    Very true!!!

  4. 29
    elsa Says:

    do you guys think she’ll write another book?

  5. 30
    Mr and Mrs Smith Says:

    Thank you for this Jared. It’s greatly appreciated. :)

  6. 31
    Lady G Says:

    Thanks Jared for the new thread.

    Angie did a great job with the article in The Economist and I am so proud to be her fan. Keep on doing what you do Angie, because the truth will always come to light.

    IT Mag is pond scrum and hopefully they will finally get what they deserved.

  7. 32
    PING Says:

    LOVE THIS WOMAN.

  8. 33
    Hiya Says:

    Thanks, Jared, not only for Angie’s wonderful article, but clearing up the tab lies about Z’s adoption!! I like how you summed it up about the unethical journalists: “In other words, reporters paid the relatives to raise the dispute.”

  9. 34
    ENERGY Says:

    Jared thanks for posting that article and clarifying about Zee’s adoption.

  10. 35
    sleepy Says:

    7 Besane : 11/15/2007 at 1:45 pm

    Tabloid writers make their living out of catering to Jolie-Pitt haters (”MiniVan majority”) who are so desperate for any bad news for Angie. There are no shortage of resentful and insecure women who take their own misery out on successful, beautiful and talented Angelina. HATERS are the ones who are exploiting the poor grandmother in Africa. Shame on you.

    totally.

  11. 36
    sam Says:

    It’s called Karma. She was rude about Madonna and now it comes back to her! She should have defended Madonna when she knew the press was against her and she knows how hard adoptions can be. But instead she was nasty. Now looks what is happening! I am sure that Z will want to see her real grandparent someday. Whether or not the adoption is legal bio parents and grandparents should always have rights to a child. Angie should take that child to see them.

    Perhaps Angie should have offered this family the thousands she is spending on this child to help support the family and keep this baby. Babies as much as possible belong with their brith family.

  12. 37
    angel Says:

    jj you are the best,outa touch are a bunch of bas*ards,i hope the get what they derserve for all the lies and made up ****

  13. 38
    bermy girl Says:

    Here we have an example of two extremes: Angelina Jolie educating herself and trying to make a positive difference in the world and the tabloid press showing the depths of their cruelty and dishonesty.

    It takes courage and strength to look at suffering and atrocity and still be positive about the world and our potential.

    What qualities can be attributed to someone who deviously contrives a story suggesting that a little girl should be separated from her legal and loving parents????!! They are so disgusting.

  14. 39
    tabitha Says:

    I knew all a long that was a bunch of bull coming from In Touch I’m glad a reputable organization told the truth about the manner. I loved Angelina’s article in the Economist.

  15. 40
    TROLL ALERT Says:

    36 sam : 11/15/2007 at 2:12 pm

    You must be American. You don’t know what the meaning of adoption is.

  16. 41
    faraway Says:

    Keep going the good work Angelina!

  17. 42
    sleepy Says:

    29 elsa : 11/15/2007 at 2:05 pm

    do you guys think she’ll write another book?

    hope she does.

  18. 43
    fresh Says:

    love her

  19. 44
    Besane Says:

    36 sam : 11/15/2007 at 2:12 pm
    It’s called Karma. …Babies as much as possible belong with their brith family.
    ——–

    Yes, it’s called Karma. Tabloids were proven wrong. Since you are just a hater who doens’t have any concern for Zahara anyway, let me give you some news. If Zahara belonged to her family, she won’t belong anywhere today, except in her little grave. Of course, you can’t care less about that, do you.

  20. 45
    sinna Says:

    OMG! Now the tabs are bringing their kids into this. What, no more break-up and fighting news on AJ & BP. They should be ashame of themselves. This is truly disgusting and shameful.

    About the article. BRAVO Angie1!! Good job

  21. 46
    originaltruth Says:

    #36 What came back to her? That the adoption is final and irrevocable? Keep up with the good works Angie and God will continue to bless you.

  22. 47
    Brad FAn Says:

    YAY!!!!!!11 I can just see her running to Brad all giddy like the cutie she is, waving the magazine and telling him see, I’m not just an actress you know!”

    Squeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That’s Brad’s ‘Baby Doll” everyone.

    Congrats to one of the hardest working & passionate young women.

    Love her.

  23. 48
    GladGladGlad Says:

    7 Besane : 11/15/2007 at 1:45 pm

    Tabloid writers make their living out of catering to Jolie-Pitt haters (”MiniVan majority”) who are so desperate for any bad news for Angie. There are no shortage of resentful and insecure women who take their own misery out on successful, beautiful and talented Angelina. HATERS are the ones who are exploiting the poor grandmother in Africa. Shame on you.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Thank you Besane –exactly my thoughts

    36 sam : 11/15/2007 at 2:12 pm
    It’s called Karma. She was rude about Madonna and now it comes back to her! She should have defended Madonna when she knew the press was against her and she knows how hard adoptions can be. But instead she was nasty. Now looks what is happening! I am sure that Z will want to see her real grandparent someday. Whether or not the adoption is legal bio parents and grandparents should always have rights to a child. Angie should take that child to see them.

    Perhaps Angie should have offered this family the thousands she is spending on this child to help support the family and keep this baby. Babies as much as possible belong with their brith family.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    You think someone should lose their child because they were allegedly ruse to Madonna? That is psycho sick. Angelina wasn’t rude or nasty and she apologized for her assessment of Madonna’s adoption but it looks like she was right given the problems Madonna and Guy Ritchie have had finalizing the adoption of David — a child with a living parent and yet you seem fine with Madonna taking him out of the country away from his father and not visit since. Madonna is probably afraid if she takes David to see his family the authorities won’t let leave again. Since you are so adamant about babies needing to stay with their birth parents where is your criticism of Madonna?

  24. 49
    African Girl Says:

    And THIS right here is why is Jared is a stand up guy! How many blogs have the REAL Adoption Story up? I’m willing to bet the answer is a big fat Zero… yet they fall all over themselves printing the lies. At this point, anyone who still believes anything from the Tabs needs to be committed…honestly.

    Thank you very much Jared…You are the best.

    A big hello to all JP & JJ fans. MF…it’s good to see you posting again (was on the last thread and saw you lovely handiwork)

  25. 50
    angel Says:

    is on yahoo news,hopefully people will read it,and not buy outa touch mag tommorrow,this made my day,truth always comes out,as for sam,you are a stupid fool,not worth our reply

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 789 » Show All

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here