Top Stories

Daniel Craig & Rachel Weisz: 'Dream House' First Look!

Daniel Craig & Rachel Weisz: 'Dream House' First Look!

Check out this first look shot of Daniel Craig and Rachel Weisz together in their upcoming film Dream House!

Synopsis: A couple (Craig and Weisz) relocates their family to a quaint New England town. But as they settle into their new life, they discover their perfect home was the murder scene of a mother and her children. And the entire city believes it was at the hands of the husband who survived. When Will investigates the tragedy, his only lead comes from Ann Paterson (Naomi Watts), a neighbor who was close to the family that died. As Will and Ann piece together the disturbing puzzle, they discover that the story of the last man to leave Will’s dream house will be just as horrifying to the one who came next.

Dream House is set to hit theaters on September 30th!

Bigger pic inside…

Like Just Jared on Facebook
daniel craig rachel weisz dream house first look

JJ Links Around The Web


197 Responses to “Daniel Craig & Rachel Weisz: 'Dream House' First Look!”

Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 78 » Show All

  1. 76
    Amy Says:

    My most favorite actress is Katharine Hepburn. She was so smart, not tacky.

  2. 77
    second that Says:

    GAVIN@ 01/28/2011 at 10:38 pm

    sorry to break this to you but the condo is listed under Satsuki’s name. she is the owner of record. as for the gay innuendo, that story was long ago proven to be false. Daniel is now with Rachel.

  3. 78
    to GAVIN Says:

    Do you hope Daniel gives Satsuki nothing? OK, that’s just fine with me! LOL

  4. 79
    to Gavin Says:

    you do know that Satsuki lived with Daniel for 5 years. that is what is called a domestic partnership. which means that in the state of New York Satsuki was entitled to an equitable distribution of monies Daniel made while they were together. so how exactly did Daniel mess up by buying Satsuki that condo? she didn’t only get the condo, i have no doubt that she also got a pretty hefty cash settlement. this kind of thing goes on all the time.

  5. 80
    greedy miser Says:

    Satsuki wanted more money. Ohhhhh, what Daniel had done with the best of intentions turned out to be harmful. Poor Dan…..

  6. 81
    GAVIN Says:

    Okay, I’ll accept it that way, but second that, if this is you or not, presented this information like daniel was obligated, no “pressed” to give Satsuki something in order to move on so that he wouldn’t feel guilty for leaving her and/or as a way to slap her in the face by giving her the condo to say “okay we’re over, so take this and leave me alone”. That’s why I said that. I still feel the way I feel for rachel though. Question for conversation, what would you say if Rachel and Daniel did have an affair and the scenario is that both sats and darren were innocent and got hurt. How does anyone of you feel about the possibility of that? That is to say if you all pushed the “Facts” aside….what do you all think? I think it’s a hollywood thing as I previously said but share please….I think it makes interesting conversation. How far could actors go?

  7. 82
    greedy miser Says:

    No wonder Sats is not going to work for her living herself. To put it briefly, she has no ability to speak of.

  8. 83
    to GAVIN Says:

    ARE YOU KIDDING??? Who knows the fact on this thread?

  9. 84
    greedy miser Says:

    Darren wear a mask so that no one should recognize him. He is a sanctimonious hypocrite, and embrace an opportunity for an Award.

  10. 85
    Amy Says:

    We never know how it came about. We are neither the parties nor their people.

  11. 86
    to GAVIN Says:

    if Rachel and Daniel did have an affair and the scenario is that both sats and darren were innocent and got hurt.
    crap! your interpretation of this matter is too one-sided. we cannot learn the truth unless we hear what both parties have to say. sats and darren were innocent and got hurt? ha!! what was the basis for your delusions? there’s no evidence to back that claim. to theorize in advance of the facts biases one’s judgment. stop your illiberally biased way of thinking!!

  12. 87
    GAVIN Says:

    I said “what would you say “IF” which I believe is the key word…..I never at any point suggested that there was evidence of it , SECOND THAT, it was a What if question…because I don’t actually know.

  13. 88
    to GAVIN Says:

    I’m NOT second that. At least, there are three people arguing against you.

  14. 89
    Daniel in LOVE Says:

    I don’t care a judge wannabe. Either way, it’s none of our business.

  15. 90
    Daniel in LOVE Says:

    We saw some pics of Rachel. She maintained a calm manner. Good for her!!

  16. 91
    julliona Says:

    I take pleasure in seeing the film.

  17. 92
    the little girl Says:

    is sooo cute!!!!! what’s her name??

  18. 93
    to the little girl Says:

    Claire Geare

  19. 94
    the little girl Says:

    how cute! i could just eat her up.., thanks a lot!

  20. 95
    Last Night Says:

    The hater is upset/desperate, and very interested in Dan’s assets. So creepy!!!

  21. 96
    Cassy Says:

    In consideration to your responses, What if we are all wrong? I mean none of us were there so how can we be sure? How can we be sure that rachel left her partner for daniel and vice versa. How can we be sure if they waited to end their relationships?How can we be sure there relationships had already ended before they were in this one? We’re not. We could all be wrong about this. ALL of us. People who believe that rachel and dan hooked up after the respective breakups with their spouses could be wrong. And people who believe that they cheated could be wrong. My point even though we feel the way we feel about this, it really doesn’t matter because we weren’t there when these four people broke up, we can’t be sure. I think it’s a hookup that may or may not last based on certain trends. I could be wrong….I freely admit that, but all of you can be just as wrong. We come here to share our opinions…let’s come here with an open mind that our assumptions about a situation could be wrong, even these so called “facts” that we try to back them up with could be wrong. So in sharing that, can we please stop this bickering on who is right, who’s wrong, share our opinions, and just admire the post that my baby (lol) Jared posted. Cause seriously I am so done with reading all this bickering crap.So not Even necessary. Love ya guys.

  22. 97

    Since we are sharing thoughts on this whole scenario, let me suggest this. Maybe this is all a pr stunt, maybe Daniel needed someone to help squash the gay rumor so they enlisted Rachel to help. Her career has not been going that well ,her last movie, “The Lovely Bones” didn’t do that well at the box office. She needed to generate some more interest in her career. Daniel ditched his beard and got caught making out with some dude at gay bar, maybe the producers of Bond, suggested he get involved in a high profile (faux) romance. If anyone cares to notice the gay rumors disappeared. They certainly didn’t want reporters at press junkets and red carpet premiers asking him about that night in Venice. And what better way to sell a movie (Dream House) that may have serious production problems. Both movies (Bond and Dream House) would benefit tremendously , not that Bond needs any real pr help. But imagine this, what if, Rachel Weisz is in the next Bond movie, can you imagine the buzz and the and the media attention?, the press would go crazy, not to mention fans. Box office receipts would probably break all records. Bond 23, would go down in history as the biggest and the most profitable Bond in history.
    Please people , don’t lose your

  23. 98

    MIND over this post, just thoughts

  24. 99
    And Then There Were None Says:

    Too bad…..
    The hater (Libby) kills Dan’s thread…..

  25. 100
    And Then There Were None Says:

    Some DTD members wanted this……

Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 78 » Show All

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here